dc.relation.references | Alongi, D. 2002. Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environmental Conservation. 29 (3): 331–349
Alongi D. 2008. Mangrove forests: Resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuarine, Coastal and ShelfScience 76: 1-13
Álvarez R., E Carbonó, W. Troncoso, O. Casas, P. Reyes. 2004. La vegetación terrestre, eurihalina y dulceacuícola de la ecorregión Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta. 77-96 p. En: Garay J., J. Restrepo, O. Casas, O. Solano, F. Newman (eds). Los manglares de la ecorregión Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta: pasado, presente y futuro. INVEMAR. Serie de publicaciones especiales, No. 11. Santa Marta, 236 p.
Aronson J., E. Le Floc’h, C. Ovalle, R. Pontanier. 1993. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid lands. II. Case studies in southern Tunisia, central Chile and northern Cameroon. Restoration Ecology.3: 168–187.
Aronson, J., S. Dhillion, E. Le Floch. 1995. On the need to select an ecosystem reference, however imperfect a reply to Picket and Parker. Restoration Ecology. 3: 1-3
Ball M. 1980. Patterns of secondary succession in a mangrove forest ofsouthern Florida. Oecologia 44, 226–235
Ball M. 1988. Ecophysiology of mangroves. Trees 2:129-142
Barbier, E., S. Hacker, C. Kennedy, E. Koch, A. Stier, B. Silliman. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs. 81 (2): 169-191.
Berger, U. Hildenbrandt, H. 2000. A new approach to spatially explicit modeling of forest dynamics: spacing, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees. Ecological Modelling. 132: 297-302.
Berger, U., M. Adams, V. Grimm, H. Hildenbrand.2006. Modelling secondary succession of neotropical mangroves: Causes and consequences of growth reduction in pioneer species. Perspectives in Plan Ecology and Systematics, 7: 243-252.
Berger, U., V. Rivera-Monroy, T. Doyle, F. Dahdouh-Guebas, N. Duke, M. Fontalvo-Herazo, H. Hildenbrandt, N.Koedam, U. Mehlig, C. Piou, R. Twilley. 2008. Advances and limitations of individual-based models to analyze and predict dynamics of mangrove forests: A review. Aquatic Botany, 89: 260-274.
Berkowitz, J. 2013. Devolopment of restoration trajectory metrics in reforested bottomland hardwood applying a rapid assessment approach. Ecological Indicadors, 34: 600-605.
Betancourt, J., C. Villamil, L. Perdomo y K. Ibarra. 2012. Balance de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) en áreas de manglar de la Ciénaga Grande de Santa con diferente grado de deterioro. Informe Técnico Final. INVEMAR. Proyecto COLCIENCIAS 2105-489-25137. Santa Marta. 107 p.
Biswas, S., A. Mallik, J.Choudhury, A. Nishat. 2009. A united framework for the restoration of Southeast Asian mangroves bridging ecology, society, and economics. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 17: 365–383.
Blanco, J.A., E.A. Viloria y J.C. Narváez. 2006. ENSO and salinity changes in the CiénagaGrande de Santa Marta coastal lagoon system, Colombian Caribbean. Estu. Coast. Shelf Sci. 66: 157-167.
Borja, A., D. Dauer, E.Michael, C. Simenstad. 2010. Medium- and Long-term Recovery of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystems: Patterns, Rates and Restoration Effectiveness Ecosystems: Patterns, Rates and Restoration Effectiveness. Estuaries and Coasts. 33:1249-1260.
Bosire J., Dahdouh-Guebas F, Kairo J, Kazungu J,Dehairs F.,Koedam, N. 2005. Litter degradation and CNdynamics in reforested mangrove plantations at GaziBay, Kenya. Biological Conservation 126: 287–295.
Bosire, J., F. Dahdouh-Guebas, J. Kairo, S. Wartel, J. Kazungu, N. Kodedam. 2006. Success rates of recruited tree species and their contribution to the structural development of reforested mangrove stands. Marine Ecology Progress Series 325: 85-91.
Bosire, J., F. Dahdouh-Guebas, M. Walton, B. Crona, R. Lewis III, C. Field, J. Kairo, N. Koedam. 2008. Functionality of restored mangroves: A review. Aquatic Botany. 89: 251–259.
Botero, L y J. Mancera. 1996. Síntesis de los cambios de origen antrópico ocurridos en los últimos 40 años en la Ciénaga de Santa Marta (Colombia). Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. 20 (78): 465-474.
Botero, L. y M. Marshall. 1994. Biodiversity with the living, dying, and dead mangrove forest of the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta (Colombia) Mote Marine Lab. Tech. Rep, 366. Sarasota, USA. Final Report: 1-34.
Botero, L., H. Salzwedel. 1999. Rehabilitation of the Ciénaga Grande de SantaMarta, a mangrove-estuarine system in the Caribbean coast of Colombia. Ocean and Coastal Management. 42: 243-256
Botkin, D., James, J., James, W. 1972 Some Ecological Consequences of a Computer Model of Forest Growth. Journal of Ecology. 60 (3): 849-872.
Boto K., 1984. Waterlogged saline soils. En Snedaker, S. y. K Snedaker (eds). The Mangrove Ecosystem: Research Methods. UNESCO, Paris: 114–130
Boto K., Wellington T. 1984. Soil characteristics and nutrient status in a northern Australian mangrove forest. Estuaries 7: 61–69.
Bullok, J., J. Aronson, A. Newton, R. Pywell, J. Rey-Benayas. 2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology. 26: 541-549
Casas-Monroy O.1999. Patrones de regeneración natural del manglar de la región de la Ciénaga Grade de Santa Marta, Caribe Colombiano. Tesis de grado presentada como requisitos parcial para optar al título de Biólogo marino. Fundación Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano. Facultad de Biología Marina. Santa Marta. 123 p.
Castañeda-Moya E., Rivera-Monroy V., Twilley R. 2006. Mangrove zonation in the dry life zone of the Gulf of Fonseca, Honduras. Estuar. Coasts 29, 751–764.
Cardona, P. 1991. Características de los suelos del manglar del costado noroccidental de la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta (Complejo de Pajarales e Isla de Salamanca) y su relación con algunos atributos de la vegetación. Tesis Maestría en Biología. Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, 110 p.
Cardona, P., L. Botero. 1998. Soil characteristics and vegetation structure in a heavily deteriorated mangrove forest in the Caribbean coast of Colombia. Biotropica. 30: 24–34.
Campillo, F., N. Champagnat. 2012. Simulation and analysis of an individual-based model for graph-structured plant dynamics. Ecological Modelling. 234: 93-105.
Chen, R., R. Twilley. 1998. A gap dynamic model of mangrove forest development along gradients of soil salinity and nutrients resources. Journal of Ecology. 86: 37-51.
Chen, R., R. Twilley. 1999. A simulation model of organic matter and nutrient accumulation in mangrove wetland soils. Biogeochemistry. 44: 93-118.
Choi, Y. 2004. Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: Toward futuristic restoration. Ecological Research. 19: 75-81
Choi, Y. 2007. Restoration Ecology to the Future: A call for new paradigm. Restoration Ecology. 15 (2): 351-353.
Cintrón-Molero, G. 1992. Restoring mangrove systems. En: Thayer, G.W. (Ed.). Restoring the Nation’s Marine Environment. Maryland Seagrant Program, College Park, Maryland, pp. 223–277
Cintrón G., Lugo A., Pool D., Morris G. 1978. Mangrove in arid environments in Puerto Rico and adjacent Islands. Biotropica 10, 110–121
Clewell A, Aronson J. 2013. Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession. 2edition. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 230 pp.
Clough B., Trung-Tang D., Xuan D., Cong D. 2000. Canopy leaf area index and litter fall in stands of the mangrove Rhizophora apiculata of different age in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam .Aquatic Botany 66: 311–320
Cotes, G. 2004. Gestión institucional para la rehabilitación de la ecorregión Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta y sus bosques de manglar.41-58. En: Garay, J., J. Restrepo, O. Casas, O. Solano y F. Newmark (eds.).2004. Los manglares de la ecorregión Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta: pasado, presente y futuro. INVEMAR-Serie de publicaciones especiales No.11. Santa Marta.236 p.
Craft C., Broome B., Campbell L. 2002. “Fifteen Years of Vegetation and Soil Development Following Brackish-water Marsh Creation”. Restoration Ecology 10:248–58.
Dávila, J. 2010. Consideraciones metodológicas sobre los estudios de comunidades forestales. Revista Forestal Venezolana. 54:1:77-88
Donato, D., Kauffman, B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., Stidham, M., Kanninen M. 2011. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nature geoscience, published online. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1123.
Dey D., Schweitzer C, 2014. Restoration for the Future: Endpoints, Targets, and Indicators of Progress and Success. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 33:S43–S65
Dilger, R y Schnetter, M. 1998.The ProCiénaga Project-an Example for Delta Ecosystem Biodiversity Managing and Monitoring for the Benefit of a Local People’s Better Quality of Life. 91-100. En: Biodiversity of Colombia. A Call for Colombian-German Cooperation: Proceeding of the Bilateral Symposium Bonn, 14-15 November 1997. Manfred Kraemar; Wilhelm Barthlott (Eds.). Göttingen: Cuviller Verlag.139 p.
Edwards, K., Proffitt C. 2003. Comparison of wetland structural characteristics between created and natural saltmarshesinSouthwestLouisiana, USA. Wetlands23:344–356.
El Espectador. 2015 a. Ciénaga de Santa Marta: ¿quién actúa? Disponible en http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/medio-ambiente/cienaga-de-santa-marta-quien-actua-articulo-548627 (Consultado el 05/04/2015).
El Espectador 2015 b. Mordiscos ilegales a la Ciénaga Grande. Disponible en http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/medio-ambiente/mordiscos-ilegales-cienaga-grande-articulo-548436 (Consultado el 05/04/2015).
Ellison, A. 2000. Mangrove Restoration: Do we know enough? Restoration Ecology. 8(3): 219-229.
Ellison, J. 2012. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Planning for Mangrove Systems. Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 130 p.
Ellison, A., E. Farnsworth. 2001. Mangrove community ecology. 423-442 En Bertness, M., D. Gaines, M. Hay (eds.). Marine Community Ecology. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Elster, C., 2000. Reasons for reforestation success and failure with three mangrove species in Colombia. Forest Ecol. Manag. 131, 201–214.
Ewel J. 1987. Restoration is the ultimate test of ecological theory. 31–33. En W. R. Jordan, M. E. Gilpin y J. D. Aber (eds.) Restoration Ecology, a Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge Press, Cambridge.
Farnsworth, E., J. Ellison. 1997b. The global conservation status of mangroves. Ambio. 26: 316-330.
Feller, I., C. Lovelock, U. Berger, K. McKee, S. Joyce, M. Ball. 2010. Biocomplexity in Mangrove Ecosystems. Annual review of Marine Science. 2: 395-417.
Feller, I., K. McKee, D. Whigham, J. O'Neill. 2003. Nitrogen vs. phosphorus limitation across an ecotonal gradient in a mangrove forest. Biogeochemistry 62:145 – 175.
Field, C.1998. Rehabilitation of Mangrove Ecosystems: An Overview. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 37(8-12): 383–392.
Fitz, C., G. Kiker, J. Kim. 2011. Integrated ecological modeling and decision analysis within the Everglades Landscape. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 41:517–547.
Garay J., J. Restrepo, O. Casas, O. Solano, F. Newman (eds). 2004. Los manglares de la ecorregión Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta: pasado, presente y futuro. INVEMAR. Serie de publicaciones especiales, No. 11. Santa Marta, 236 p.
Gilman, E., J. Ellison, N. Duke, C. Field. 2008. Threats to mangroves from climate change and adaptation options: A review. Aquatic Botany. 89: 237–250
Giraldo, E. 1995. Regeneración natural del manglar en el sector occidental (Isla Salamanca-complejo Pajarales) de la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Caribe Colombiano. Tesis Biología Marina. Calí, 116p.
Giri, C., E. Ochieng, L. Tieszen, Z. Zhu, A. Singh, T. Loveland, J. Masek, N. Duke. 2011. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using Earth observation satellite data. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 20, 154–159.
Gleasona K., Ewelb K., Huea N. 2003. Soil redox conditions and plant–soil relationships in a micronesian mangrove forest. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56: 1065–1074
Gocke K., Mancera-Pinera E., Vidal L., Fonseca D. 2003. Productividad primaria y respiración de la comunidad planctónica en varias lagunas costeras del delta exterior del río Magdalena, Colombia. bol. Invemar[online]. .32: .1, pp. 125-144.
Gónima, L., J.E. Mancera-Pineda y L. Botero-Arboleda. 1998. Aplicación de imágenes de satélite al diagnóstico ambiental de un complejo lagunar estuarino tropical: Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Caribe colombiano. INVEMAR-Serie de Publicaciones Especiales 4. 52 p.
Gravel D., Canham C., Beauder M., Messier C. 2010. Shade tolerance, canopy gaps and mechanisms of coexistence of forest trees. Oikos, 119, 475– 484.
Guariguata M., Ostertag R. 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succesion: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 148: 185-206-
Hallett, L., S. Diver, M. Eitzel, J. Olson, B. Ramage, H. Sardinas, Z. Statman-eil, K. Suding. 2013 Do we practice what we preach? Goal setting for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology. 21 (3): 312-319.
Halme, P., K. Allen, A. Auninis, R. Bradshaw, G. Brumelis, V. Cada, J. Clear, A. Eriksson, G. Hannon, E. Hyvarinen, S. Ikauniece, R. Isenaite, B. Jonson, K. Junninen, S. Kareksela, A. Komonen, J. Kotiaho, J. Kouki, T. Kuuluvainen, A. Mazziotta, M. Mönkkönen, K. Nyholm, A. Oldén, E. Shorohova, N. Strange, T. Toivanen, I. Vanha-Majamaa, T. Wallenius, A. Ylisirniö, E. Zin. 2013. Challenges of ecological restoration: Lessons from forest in northern Europe. Biological Conservation 167: 249-256.
Hernández, C., K. Gocke.1990. Productividad primaria en la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia. An Inst. Invest. Mar. 19-20: 101-119.
Hobbs, R., D. Norton. 1996. Toward a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4: 9-12.
Hobbs, R. 2007. Setting effective and realistic restoration goals: Key directions for research. Restoration Ecology. 15 (2): 354-357.
Ibarra, K. P., M.C. Gómez, E.A. Viloria, E. Arteaga, M. Quintero, I. Cuadrado, J. A. Rodríguez, L. Licero, L.V. Perdomo y M. Rueda. 2014. Monitoreo de las condiciones ambientales y los
cambios estructurales y funcionales de las comunidades vegetales y de los recursos pesqueros durante la rehabilitación de la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta. INVEMAR. Informe Técnico Final 2013. Santa Marta 160 p.+ anexos.
INVEMAR. 2002. Monitoreo de las condiciones ambientales y los cambios estructurales y funcionales de las comunidades vegetales y de los recursos pesqueros durante la rehabilitación de la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta. Informe técnico final 1999-2002. Santa Marta. 232 p
Kairo, J., F. Dahdouh-Guebas, J. Bosire, N. Koedam. 2001. Restoration and management of mangrove system: a lesson for and from the East African region. South African Journal of Botany. 67: 383–389.
Keane, R., M. Austin, C. Field, A. Huth, M. Lexer, D. Peters, A. Solomon, P. Wychoff. 2001. Tree mortality in gap models: application to climate change. Climatic Change. 51: 509–540.
Kentula, M. E., R. P. Brooks, S. E. Gwm, C. C. Holland, A. D. Sherman, and J. C. Sifneos. 1992. An approach to improving decision making in wetland restoration and creation. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
Kentula, M. E. 2000. Perspectives on setting success criteria for wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering 15:199-209.
Kohyama, T. 1993. Size-structured tree populations in gap dynamic forest the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species. Journal of Ecology, 81, 131 – 143.
Kohyama T, Takada T. 2012. One-sided competition for light promotes coexistence of forest trees that share the same adult height. Journal of Ecology 100, 1501 – 1511.
LABSIS-INVEMAR. 2015. Laboratorio de Servicios de Información. Datos reportados en Agosto de 2015 Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta En proyección Trasverse de Mercador referido al elipsoide del datum Bogotá en unidades grados, minutos y segundos y hectáreas.ArcGis 10.2.1.
Latimer, J, W. Boothman, C. Pesch, G Chmura, V. Pospelova, S. Jayaraman. 2003. Environmental stress and recovery: The geochemical record of human disturbance in New Bedford Harbor and Apponagansett Bay, Massachusetts (USA). The Science of the Total Environment. 313: 153 – 176.
Langman O.C., J. Hale, C. Hale, C. Cormack, M. Risk, S. Madon. 2012. Developing multimetric indices for monitoring ecological restoration progress in salt marshes. Marine Pollution Bulletin 64: 820-835.
León R., A. White.1999. Mangrove rehabilitation in the Phillippines. En: An Internation perspective of Wetland Rehabilitation. William Sreever (Ed). Springer Science and Bussiness Media. 327 p.
Lewis, R. 1982. Mangrove forests. En: Lewis, R.R. (Ed.). Creation and Restoration of Coastal Plant Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 153–172
Lewis, R. 2005. Ecological engineering for successful management and restoration of mangrove forests. Ecological Engineering. 24: 403–418.
Lewis, R. 2011. How Successful Mangrove Forest Restoration Informs the Process of Successful General Wetland Restoration. Bational Wetlands Newsletter 33 (4): 23-25
Lozada-Dávila, J. 2010. Consideraciones metodológicas sobre los estudios de comunidades forestales. Revista Forestal Venezolana 54(1): 77-88.
Lugo A. 1978. Stress and ecosystems. En J. H. Thorp and J. W. Gibbons (Eds.). Energy and environmental stress in aquatic ecosytems, pp. 62-101. U.S. Department of Energy Symposium Series (CONF-7714) National Technical Information Services, Springfield, Virginia. 911 pp
Lugo A., Cintron G., Goenaga C, 1981. Mangrove ecosystems under stress. En G. W. Barret Y R. Rosenberg (Eds.). Stress effects on natural ecosystems, pp. 129-153. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 305 pp.
Martinez-Martinez, E., A. Nejadhashemi, S. Woznicki, B. Love. 2014. Modeling the hydrological significance of wetland restoration scenarios. Journal of Environmental Management. 133: 121-134
Matthews, J., G. Spyreas, A. Endress. 2009. Trajectories of Vegetation-Based Indicators used to asses wetland restoration progress. Ecological Applications 19, 8: 2093-2107.
Matthews,J. G. Spyregas. 2010. Convergence and divergence in plant community trajectories as a framework for monitoring wetland restoration progress. Journal of Applied Ecology. 47: 1128–1136
Montoya, D., L. Rogers, J. Memmott. 2012. Emerging perspectives in the restoration of biodiversity-based ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 27 (12): 666-672.
Morgan P., Short F. 2002. Using Functional Trajectories to Track Constructed Salt Marsh Development in the Great Bay Estuary, Maine/New Hampshire, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 10 (3): 461–473.
National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.
Obeysekera, J., L. Kuebler, S. Ahmed, M. Chang, V. Engel, C. Langevin, E. Swain, Y. Wan. 2011. Use of Hydrological and Hydrodynamic Modelling for Ecosystem Restoration. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 41: 447–488.
Ortiz J.2003. Reforestación de manglar en la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Caribe Colombiano. Resumen sometido en el XIII World Forestry Congress. Québec, Canada.
Pacala S., Canham C., Saponara J., Silander J., Kobe R., Ribbens E. 1996. Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecological Monographs, 66, 1 – 43
Passell, H. D. 2000. Recovery of bird species in minimally restored Indonesian thin strips mines. Restoration Ecology 8:112–118.
Purcell, A. H., C. Friedrich, and V. H. Resh. 2002. An assessment of a small urban stream restoration project in northern California. Restoration Ecology 10:685–694
Perdomo, 2001. Evaluación de procesos de regeneración natural del manglar después de la reapertura de caños de agua dulce (Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia) Tesis Maestría Biología Marina. Santa Marta, 117 p.
Pellegrini J., Soares M., Chaves F., Estrada G., Cavalcanti V. 2009. A method for the classification of mangrove forests and sensitivity/vulnerability analysis. J Coast Res 56:443–447.
Piñeiro, M., H. Eger, R. Echeverría, N. O’ Shanahan. 2002. Elementos para fortalecer la cooperación entre la GTZ y el BID en desarrollo rural y manejo de recursos naturales: lecciones de tres estudios de caso. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Serie de informes de buenas prácticas del Departamento de Desarrollo Sostenible, Washington, D.C. 35 p.
PROCIÉNAGA. 1994. Estudio de Impacto Ambiental proyecto Reapertura de Canales en el Delta Exterior Derecho del Río Magdalena. Informe Final. Santa Marta. 382 p.
R. Development Core Team. 2015: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0, recuperado de http://www.R-project.org.
Rabinowitz D. 1978. Dispersal Properties of Mangrove Propagule. Biotropica 10 (1): 47-57.
Reef, R., Feller, I., C. Lovelock. 2010. Nutrition of mangroves. Tree Physiology 30: 1148-1160
Rivera-Monroy, V., J.E. Mancera-Pineda, R. Twilley, O. Casas, E. Castañeda, J. Restrepo, F. Daza, L. Perdomo, P. Reyes, E. Campos, M. Villamil, F. Pinto, P. Cardona, A. Vidal., W. Troncoso, D. Fonseca, E. Viloria, G. Sanchez, P. Rojas, J Narváez, J. Blanco, G. Ramírez, C. Henry, J. Fernández, F. Newmark, E. Carbonó, C. Hernández, G. Cotes, H. Sanchez, Y. Herrera, A. Maria, R. Zuñiga, I. Acosta, A. Eguren. 2001. Estructura y función de un ecosistema de manglar a lo largo de una i de restauración: El caso de la región de la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta. University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (INVEMAR), Santa Marta. 285 p.
Rivera-Monroy, V., R. Twilley, D. Bone, D. Childers, D. Coronado-Molina, I. Feller, J. Herrera-Silveira, R. Jaffe, E. Mancera, E. Rejmankova, J. Salisbury, E. Weil. 2004. A Conceptual Framework to Develop Long-Term Ecological Research and Management Objectives in the Wider Caribbean Region. BioScience. 54 (9): 843-856.
Röderstein M., L. Perdomo, C. Villamil, T. Hauffe, M. Schnetter.2014. Long-term vegetation changes in a tropical coastal lagoon system after interventions in the hydrological conditions. Aquatic Botany 113: 19-31
Rodhouse T.J., K. Irvine, K. Vierling, L. Vierling. 2011. Estimating Temporal Trend in the Presence of Spatial Complexity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for a Wetland Plant Population Undergoing Restoration. PLoS ONE 6. 12: 1-9.
Salmo, S., Juanico D. 2015. An individual based model of long term forest growth and carbon sequestration in planted mangroves under salinity an inundation stresses. International Journal of Philippine Science and Technology 8(2): 31—35.
Salmo S., Lovelock K., Duke N. 2013.Vegetation and soil characteristics as indicators of restoration trajectories in restored mangroves. Hidrobiología 720: 1-18.
Sanchéz-Páez, H., M. Rendón-Ordúz, O. Casas-Monroy. 2004. Historia del proceso de deterioro de los bosques de manglar. 61-73. En: Garay, J., J. Restrepo, O. Casas, O. Solano y F. Newmark (eds.).2004. Los manglares de la ecorregión Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta: pasado, presente y futuro. INVEMAR-Serie de publicaciones especiales No.11. Santa Marta.236 p.
Sánchez-Páez H., Ulloa-Delgado G., Tavera H. 2009. Manejo Integrado de los manglares por comunidades locales. Caribe de Colombia. Proyecto PD 60/01 Rev. 1. República de Colombia, Ministerio de Ambiente, vivienda y desarrollo territorial-CONIF, OIMT. Bogotá, Colombia, 335 p.
SER (Society for Ecological Restoration). 2004. Principios de SER International sobre la restauración ecológica. Grupo de trabajo sobre ciencia y políticas. Recuperado de www.ser.org. Consultado 24/03/2014.
SER, 2005. Guidelines for Developing and Managing Ecological Restoration Projects. Recuperado de: http://www.ser.org/resources/resources-detail-view/guidelines-for-developing-and-managing-ecological-restoration-projects. Consultado 06/06/2015
Serrano, L.1995. Evaluación de la estructura del manglar en zonas sometidas a tensión por alteración del equilibrio hídrico en el delta exterior del Río Magdalena - Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta Caribe colombiano. Tesis Biología Marina. Universidad del Valle. Santiago de Calí, 81p.
Scarlate A., Soriano-Sierra E., Pagliosa P., Cintrón G., Schaeffer-Novelli Y., Menghini R., Coelho-Jr C., Antunes P., Lewis III R., Simonassi J., Andrade-Alves J., Boscatto F., Dutra. J. 2012. Secondary succession impairment in restored mangroves. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 20:447–459
Simenstad C. y R. Thom. 1996. Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetland. Ecological Applications.6: 38–56.
Simenstad, C., D. Reed, M. Ford. 2006. When is restoration not? Incorporating landscape-scale processes to restore self-sustaining ecosystems in coastal wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering. 26: 27-39.
Smith III. 1992. Forest Structure. En: Robertson A.I, Alongi D.M (eds) Coastal and estuarine studies 41: Tropical Mangrove ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 101–136
Smith, T., Robblee, M., Wanless, H., Doyle, T. W. 1994. Mangroves, hurricanes, and lighting strikes. BioScience 44, 256-262.
Srivasatava P, Guan S, Muktar A. 1988. Progress of crop in some Rhizophora stands before first thinning in Matang Mangrove Reserve of Peninsular Malaysia. Pertanika 11, 365–374.
Stanfurt J., Palik B., Dumroese R. 2014. Contemporany forest restoration: A review emphasizing function. Forest Ecology and Management 331: 292–323
Stevenson N., Lewis R., Burbridge P. 1999. Disused shrimp ponds and mangrove rehabilitation. Pp. 277–297 En: Streever, W.J. (ed.). An International Perspective on Wetland Rehabilitation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 338 pp.
Steyer, G., C. Sasser, J. Visser, E. Stewenson, J. Nyman, R. Raynie. 2003. A proposed coast-wide reference monitoring system for evaluating wetland restoration trajectories in Louisiana. Environmental Monutoring and Assesment, 81: 107-117.
Tilman D.1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats.Ecology, 75, 2 – 16.
Tolhurst, T. Chapman G. 2007. Patterns in biogeochemical properties of sediments and benthic animals among different habitats in mangrove forests. Austral Ecology 32: 775–788.
Thomanss. E. 2004. Forest growth models. Recuperado de: http://models.etiennethomassen.com. Consultado: 15/06/2015
Tomlinson, P. B. 1986. The Botany of mangroves. London: Cambridge University Press, 413 p.
Twilley, R. 1995. Properties of mangrove ecosystems related to the energy signature of coastal environments. Mawimum Power. Pp 43-62. En May (Eds). University of Colorado Press, Boulder, Colorado.
Twilley, R., Chen, R. 1998. A water budget and hydrology model of a basin mangrove. forest in Rookery Bay, Florida. Australian Journal of Freshwater and Marine Research. 49: 309-323.
Twilley, R., V. Rivera-Monroy, R. Chen, L. Botero.1998. Adapting an Ecological Mangrove Model to Simulate Trajectories in Restoration Ecology. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 37:404-419.
Twilley, R. V. Rivera-Monroy. 2005. Developing performance measure of Mangrove wetlands using simulation models of hydrology, nutrient, biochemistry, and community dynamics. Journal of Coastal Research: 79-93.
Valiela, I., J. L. Bowen, J. K. York. 2001. Mangrove forest: one of the world´s threatened major tropical environments. Bioscience. 51: 807-815.
Vilardy, S., y González, J.A. (Eds.). 2011. Repensando la Ciénaga: Nuevas miradas y estrategias para la sostenibilidad en la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta. Universidad del Magdalena y Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Santa Marta, Colombia. 228 p.
Visser, J.M., S.M. Duke-Sylvester, J. Carter, W. Broussard. 2013. A computer model to forecast wetland vegetation changes resulting from restoration and protection in coastal Louisiana. 51–59. En: Peyronnin, N. y Reed, D. (eds.), Louisiana’s 2012 Coastal Master Plan Technical Analysis, Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 67,. Coconut Creek, Florida.
Wang, X., S. Shang, Z. Qu, T. Liu, A. Melesse, W. Yang. 2010. Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management. 91: 1511-1525.
Walters, B., P. Ronnback, J. M. Kovacs, B. Crona, S. A. Hussain, R. Badola, J. H. Primavera, E. B. Barbier, F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2008. Ethnobiology, socioeconomics and management of mangrove forests: a review. Aquatic Botany. 89: 220- 236.
White P., Walker J. 1997. Approximating nature's variation: selecting andusing reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:338-349.
Wiedemann, H. 1973. Reconnaisance of the Cienaga Grande de Santa Marta. Colombia: physical parameters and geological history. Mitt. Inst Colombo-Aleman Invest Cient. 7: 85-119.
Zedler, J., J. Callaway. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology. 7 (1): 69-73. |