Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorMartínez Medina, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorMontes Cruz, José Joaquín
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-22T20:09:37Z
dc.date.available2021-01-22T20:09:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMontes, J. (2020). Traducir lo material : el codiseño entre diseñadores industriales y tejedoras-diseñadoras wayúu [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78881
dc.description.abstractEste trabajo propone una exploración etnográfica de dos talleres de codiseño entre tejedoras-diseñadoras wayúu y diseñadores industriales organizados en el marco de un convenio entre la Fundación Caminos de Identidad y la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana de Bogotá en el 2019. Cada taller duró una semana y se espaciaron seis meses entre ellos. Esta investigación, tanto descriptiva como especulativa, pretende aportar una mirada desde los Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología a las diferencias que emergen entre formas de conocimiento con miras a obtener nuevas relaciones entre actores de una cadena de suministro de artesanía en Colombia. Propongo abordar estos espacios como zonas de contacto entre labranzas (taskscapes) en las que se traducen no sólo palabras sino prácticas que involucran cuerpos, conceptos y materiales. Todos estos elementos y sus relaciones los describo en el primer capítulo, mientras que en el segundo describo los riesgos y oportunidades que pude identificar de estos lugares de traducción y contacto. Por último, hago una síntesis de los conceptos que he desarrollado en la etnografía y propongo entender el codiseño como una forma de ontología política que debe tender hacia formas regenerativas de diseño y, por lo tanto, a permitir la contaminación que hace que todos los involucrados cambien mediante su participación.
dc.description.abstractThis master thesis is an ethnographic exploration of two co-design workshops between Wayúu weavers-designers and industrial designers that were organized in the framework of an agreement between the Fundación Caminos de Identidad and the Pontifical Xaverian University of Bogotá in 2019. Each workshop lasted one week and was spaced six months apart from the next. This research, both descriptive and speculative, aims to provide a Science and Technology Studies view on the differences that emerge between kinds of knowledge. It also points to new relationships between actants in a supply chain of crafts in Colombia. My approach proposes contact zones between taskscapes as a way to describe how words, practices involving bodies, concepts and materials are translated. All these elements and their relationships are described in the first chapter, while in the second chapter I describe the risks and opportunities of these places of translation and contact zones. Finally, I make a synthesis of the concepts that I have developed during the ethnographical process and propose an understanding of co-design as a form of political ontology that should tend towards regenerative forms of design and, therefore, towards the contamination that allows all those involved to change by participating.
dc.format.extent190
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales
dc.subject.ddc609 - Tratamiento histórico, geográfico, biografía
dc.titleTraducir lo material : el codiseño entre diseñadores industriales y tejedoras-diseñadoras wayúu
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.description.additionalLínea de Investigación: producción y usos de la tecnología
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Sociología
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAguilar, A. C. Q., & Jurado, G. S. B. (2006). Conspirando con los artesanos: crítica y propuesta al diseño en la artesanía. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
dc.relation.referencesAlbers, J. (1985). La interacción del color (Vol. 909). Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesAlpers, S. (1983). The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century (Vol. 73). University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, W. (2002). Introduction: postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 32(5–6), 643–658.
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, W., & Adams, V. (2008). Pramoedya’s chickens: Postcolonial studies of technoscience. En E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (Vol. 3, pp. 181–204). MIT press Cambridge, MA.
dc.relation.referencesAppadurai, A. (1991). Introducción: Las mercancías y la política del valor. En A. Appadurai (Ed.), La vida social de las cosas. Grijalbo.
dc.relation.referencesArtesanías de Colombia. (2005). Encuentro entre diseñadores y artesanos : guía práctica. (Craft Revival Trust & United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (eds.)). Artesanías de Colombia S.A.
dc.relation.referencesAttali, J. (1995). Ruidos: ensayo sobre la economía política de la música. Siglo XXI.
dc.relation.referencesBaker, D. (1979). Jazz pedagogy: A comprehensive method of jazz education for teacher and student (Número 15). Alfred Music Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesBarad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 28(3), 801–831.
dc.relation.referencesBarad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is critical about critical design? SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3297–3306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451
dc.relation.referencesBenjamin, W. (1996). La tarea del traductor. En D. L. García (Ed.), Teorías de la traducción: antología de textos (Vol. 3) (pp. 335–347). Univ de la Castilla La Mancha.
dc.relation.referencesBlaser, M. (2009). The Threat of the Yrmo: The Political Ontology of a Sustainable Hunting Program. American Anthropologist, 111(1), 10–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40300782
dc.relation.referencesBlaser, M. (2018). ¿Es otra cosmopolítica posible? Anthropologica, 36(41), 117–144.
dc.relation.referencesBotero, A. (2013). Expanding Design Space (s): Design in Communal Endeavours. Aalto Arts Books.
dc.relation.referencesBotero, A., & Hyysalo, S. (2013). Ageing together: Steps towards evolutionary co-design in everyday practices. CoDesign, 9(1), 37–54.
dc.relation.referencesBowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
dc.relation.referencesBürdek, B. E. (1994). Diseño. Historia, teoría, y práctica del diseño industrial. Gustavo Gili.
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M., & Law, J. (1982). On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 615–625.
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M., & Law, J. (2005). On qualculation, agency, and otherness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(5), 717–733.
dc.relation.referencesCastro-Gómez, S., & Grosfoguel, R. (2007). Giro decolonial: reflexiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global (Universidad Central & Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (eds.); Siglo del Hombre).
dc.relation.referencesChakrabarty, D. (2008). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesChaves, M., Montenegro, M., & Zambrano, M. (2010). Mercado, consumo y patrimonialización cultural. Revista Colombiana de Antropolog{\’\i}a, 46(1), 7–26.
dc.relation.referencesCitton, Y. (2017). The Ecology of Attention. Polity Press.
dc.relation.referencesCollins, J. L. (2002). Mapping a global labor market: gender and skill in the globalizing garment industry. Gender & Society, 16(6), 921–940.
dc.relation.referencesCollins, J. L. (2016). Expanding the labor theory of value. Dialectical Anthropology, 40(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-016-9418-5
dc.relation.referencesColombia. Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico. Artesanias De Colombia S.A. (1990). La artesania un esfuerzo para el desarrollo. Las realizaciones de un quinquenio 1985-1990 / Artesanias de Colombia. Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico.
dc.relation.referencesCoppens, W. (1988). Los aborígenes de Venezuela. Fundación La Salle.
dc.relation.referencesDavid, S., Sabiescu, A. G., & Cantoni, L. (2013). Co-design with communities. A reflection on the literature. Proceedings of the 7th International Development Informatics Association Conference, 152–166.
dc.relation.referencesde la Bellacasa, Maria Puig. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: assembling neglected things. Social studies of science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
dc.relation.referencesde la Bellacasa, María Puig. (2012). “Nothing comes without its world”: Thinking with care. Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
dc.relation.referencesde la Bellacasa, María Puig. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds (Vol. 41). U of Minnesota Press.
dc.relation.referencesde la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesde la Cadena, M. (2018). Uncommoning nature: stories from the Anthropo-not-seen. Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros (69), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478003311-003
dc.relation.referencesde la Cadena, M. (2019). Earth-beings: Andean indigenous religion, but not only. En K. Omura, G. J. Otsuki, S. Satsuka, & A. Morita (Eds.), World Multiple (pp. 21–36). Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesde la Cadena, M., & Blaser, M. (Eds.). (2018). A world of many worlds. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesde la Cadena, M., Lien, M. E., Blaser, M., Jensen, C. B., Lea, T., Morita, A., Swanson, H., Ween, G. B., West, P., & Wiener, M. (2015). Anthropology and STS: Generative interfaces, multiple locations. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(1), 437–475.
dc.relation.referencesde Sousa Santos, B. (2015). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesde Téllez, G. T. (1994). El tejido precolombino. Historia crítica, 9, 1.
dc.relation.referencesDerrida, J. (1995). Points: Interviews, 1974-1994. Stanford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesDespret, V. (2008). El cuerpo de nuestros desvelos: Figuras de la anthropo-zoo-genesis. En T. Sanchez Criado (Ed.), Tecnogénesis, La construcción técnica de las ecologías humanas (pp. 229–260). AIBR (Antropologos Iberoamericanos en Red).
dc.relation.referencesEscobar, A. (2016). Autonomía y Diseño: La realización de lo comunal. Universidad del Cauca.
dc.relation.referencesEscobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesFlórez, É. (2019). Hegelian Dancers (45 Salón Nacional de Artistas Colombia & M. Kalmanovitz González (Eds.)). Colombo Andina de Impresos s.a.s.
dc.relation.referencesFucai, & Unicef. (2015). Comunidades Tejedoras de Vida. Kimpres.
dc.relation.referencesHarari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. Penguin.
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. J. (1991). Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: la reinvención de la naturaleza (M. Talens (Ed.); 1995a ed.). Cátedra.
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. J. (2013). When species meet (Vol. 3). U of Minnesota Press.
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. J. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165.
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHenare, A., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (2007). Thinking through things: theorising artefacts ethnographically. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesHobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (2012). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHyysalo, S., Jensen, T. E., & Oudshoorn, N. (2016). The new production of users: changing innovation collectives and involvement strategies. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesIngold, T. (1993). The Art of Translation in a Continuous World. En G. Pálsson (Ed.), Beyond Boundaries. Understanding, Translation and Anthropological Discourse (pp. 210–230). Berg.
dc.relation.referencesIngold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesIngold, T. (2014). That’s enough about ethnography! HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383–395.
dc.relation.referencesJaimes, C., Sánchez, B., Sierra, V., & Tarazona, M. (2018). El mito y el rito en los procesos indentitarios femeninos en la cultura wayúu. Contextos, 17(1). http://www.contextos-revista.com.co/Revista 17/a_03.html
dc.relation.referencesJensen, C. B., Ballestero, A., de la Cadena, M., Fisch, M., & Ishii, M. (2017). New ontologies? Reflections on some recent ‘turns’ in STS, anthropology and philosophy. En Social Anthropology (Vol. 25, Número 4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12449
dc.relation.referencesJurado, G. S. B., Aguilar, A. C. Q., & Juajibioy, J. C. J. (2014). Riesgos y tensiones de las marcas colectivas y denominaciones de origen de las creaciones colectivas artesanales indígenas. Apuntes. Revista de estudios sobre patrimonio cultural, 27(1).
dc.relation.referencesKensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(3), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008689307411
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. En M. Mulkay & K. D. Knorr-Cetina (Eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science (pp. 141–170). Sage.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1986). Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together. En H. Kuklick (Ed.), Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present (pp. 1–40). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 103–131.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1992a). Ciencia en acción (Vol. 1987). Barcelona: Labor.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1992b). Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 225–228.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1999a). Circulating reference: Sampling the soil in the Amazon forest. En Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies (pp. 24–79). Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1999b). On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review, 47(1_suppl), 15–25.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2004a). How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2004a). How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2008). Reensamblar lo social. una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. (Zadunaisky). Ediciones Manantial.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J. (1989). Technology and Heterogenous Engineering: The case of Portuguese Expansion. En W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social Construction of Technological Systems (4th editio, pp. 111–134). MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J., & Lin, W. (2017). Provincializing STS: Postcoloniality, symmetry, and method. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 11(2), 211–227.
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on Materiality and Sociality. The Sociological Review, 43(2), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00604.x
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716
dc.relation.referencesLevi, P. (1987). El sistema periódico (Carmen Mar). Alianza Editorial.
dc.relation.referencesMacAdam, D. L. (1942). Visual Sensitivities to Color Differences in Daylight. Jourlnal of the Optical Society of America, 32(5), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.32.000247
dc.relation.referencesMamidipudi, A. (2016). Towards a Theory of Innovation in Handloom Weaving in India [Doctoral Dissertation, Maastricht University.]. https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/towards-a-theory-of-innovation-in-handloom-weaving-in-india
dc.relation.referencesMamidipudi, A. (2018). Constructing Common Knowledge: Design Practice for Social Change in Craft Livelihoods in India. Design Issues, 34(4), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00510
dc.relation.referencesMansen, R. (1973). Guajiro. En Instituto Lingüístico de Verano & Ministerio de Gobierno - República de Colombia (Eds.), Aspectos de la cultura material de grupos étnicos de Colombia (Tomo 1). Towsend.
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2014). Making Things Happen: Social Innovation and Design. Design Issues, 30(1), 57–66. http://10.0.4.138/DESI_a_00248
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs : An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. The MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesMargolin, V. (2002). The politics of the artificial: Essays on design and design studies. University of Chicago press.
dc.relation.referencesMárquez-Gutiérrez, S. D. (2015). Hacer y des-hacer prototipos: Encuentros entre le bordado artesanal, la etnografía y el diseño de tecnologías [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/56552
dc.relation.referencesMazzoldi, M. (2004). Simbolismo del ritual de paso femenino entre los Wayuu de la alta Guajira. Maguaré, 18, 10.
dc.relation.referencesMazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy. Penguin.
dc.relation.referencesMichael, M. (2017). Enacting Big Futures, Little Futures: Toward an ecology of futures. Sociological Review, 509–524. http://10.0.4.87/1467-954X.12444
dc.relation.referencesMol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMol, A., & Law, J. (2004). Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: the Example of Hypoglycaemia. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042932
dc.relation.referencesMol, A., & Mesman, J. (1996). Neonatal Food and the Politics of Theory: Some Questions of Method. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026002009
dc.relation.referencesMoncada, A. (2015). Cuando nuestras ancestras hablan: genealogías de mujeres indígenas y saberes del paülujutu’u (encierro) wayuu. Revista venezolana de estudios de la mujer, 20(45), 149–164.
dc.relation.referencesNascimento, S., & Pólvora, A. (2013). Opening Up Technologies to the Social: Between Interdisciplinarity and Citizen Participation. En Design Issues (Vol. 29, Número 4, pp. 31–40). http://10.0.4.138/DESI_a_00228
dc.relation.referencesNorgaard, M. (2008). Descriptions of Improvisational Thinking by Artist-level Jazz Musicians [PhD dissertation, University of Texas]. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/17893
dc.relation.referencesOlarte-Sierra, M. F., & Pérez-Bustos, T. (2020). Careful Speculations: Toward a Caring Science of Forensic Genetics in Colombia. Feminist Studies, 46(1), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.15767/feministstudies.46.1.0158
dc.relation.referencesOmura, K., Otsuki, G. J., Satsuka, S., & Morita, A. (Eds.). (2019). The World Multiple. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesOrdoñez Castillo, D. (2018). Del testigo virtual al testigo emocional: lugares, tecnologías y afectos en el Museo Casa de la Memoria de Medellín [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/69177
dc.relation.referencesOudshoorn, N. (2003). Clinical Trials as a Cultural Niche in Which to Configure Gender Identities of Users: The Case of Male Contraceptive Development. En N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter (pp. 209–228). MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesOudshoorn, N. E. J., & Pinch, T. (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. MIT press.
dc.relation.referencesOudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004). Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(1), 30–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1558005
dc.relation.referencesPapadopoulos, D. (2018). Experimental practice: Technoscience, alterontologies, and more-than-social movements. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesPapanek, V. (1985). Design for the Real World (2nd ed.). Academy Chicago.
dc.relation.referencesPatarroyo, J., Sánchez-Aldana, E., Rincón, N., Cortes-Rico, L., & Pérez-Bustos, T. (2019). Testimonial Digital Textiles: Material metaphors to think with care about reconciliation with four memory sewing circles in Colombia. Nordes, 8.
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Bustos, T. (2016). El tejido como conocimiento, el conocimiento como tejido: reflexiones feministas en torno a la agencia de las materialidades. Rev. Colomb. Soc., 39(2), 163–182. http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/67210/1/58970-299042-2-PB.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Bustos, T., Chocontá-Piraquive, A., Rincón-Rincón, C., & Sánchez-Aldana, E. (2019). Hacer-se textil: cuestionando la feminización de los oficios textiles. Tabula Rasa, 32, 249–270.
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Bustos, T., & Márquez, S. D. (2016). Destejiendo puntos de vista feministas: reflexiones metodológicas desde la etnografía del diseño de una tecnología. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad-CTS, 11(31), 147–169.
dc.relation.referencesPratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the Contact Zone. Profession, 33–40.
dc.relation.referencesPratt, M. L. (2007). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, D. (2011). Colombia Artesanal: Disputas por una colombianidad desde la producción artesanal [Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia]. https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/handle/10554/1524
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, M., & Rojas, H. (1990). Arte Wayuu. Intercor.
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo Forero, O. (2009). La mundialización del darwinismo como proceso y como texto. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 14, 41–62.
dc.relation.referencesRivera Cusicanqui, S., & Barragán, R. (s/f). Debates PostColoniales: una introducción a los estudios de la subalteridad (S. Rivera Cusicanqui & R. Barragán (Eds.); Sierpe Pub).
dc.relation.referencesRoosth, S. (2012). Evolutionary Yarns in Seahorse Valley: Living Tissues, Wooly Textiles, Theoretical Biologies. differences, 23(3), 9–41.
dc.relation.referencesRoss, P. (2011). Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences. Social Studies of Science, 41(2), 251–270. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41301904
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
dc.relation.referencesSatsuka, S. (2019). Translation in the world multiple. En K. Omura, G. J. Otsuki, S. Satsuka, & A. Morita (Eds.), The World Multiple (pp. 219–232). Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesSavransky, M., Wilkie, A., & Rosengarten, M. (2017). The lure of possible futures: on speculative research. En Speculative Research (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesSherlock, S. (2014). The Performativity of Value : On the Citability of Cultural Commodities. Lexington Books.
dc.relation.referencesShultz Morales, F. (2008). Diseño y Artesanía. En S. Fernández & G. Bonsiepe (Eds.), Historia del diseño en América Latina y el Caribe: industrialización y comunicación visual para la autonomía. Blücher.
dc.relation.referencesSierra Ortiz, E. L. (2013). Tejidos Culturales al viento. Construcciones locales de la propiedad cultural artesanal en Kasiwolin y Arrütkajui en la Guajira, Colombia. Universidad de los Andes.
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387–420.
dc.relation.referencesStengers, I. (1997). Power and invention: situating science (Vol. 10). U of Minnesota Press.
dc.relation.referencesStengers, I. (2005a). Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11(1), 183–196.
dc.relation.referencesStengers, I. (2005b). The cosmopolitical proposal. Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy, 994, 994.
dc.relation.referencesStengers, I. (2011). The care of the possible: Isabelle Stengers interviewed by Erik Bordeleau. Scapegoat: Landscape, Architecture, Political Economy, 1, 12–17.
dc.relation.referencesStengers, I. (2018a). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science. Polity Press.
dc.relation.referencesStengers, I. (2018b). The Challenge of Ontological Politics. En M. de la Cadena & M. Blaser (Eds.), A World of Many Worlds. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2005). Affiliative Objects. Organization, 12(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051276
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2007). Agencies in technology design: Feminist reconfigurations. Proceedings of 5th European Symposium on Gender & ICT, Digital Cultures: Participation–Empowerment–Diversity.
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2008). Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial. The handbook of science and technology studies, 139–164.
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2011a). Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 1–18. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/stable/41287716
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2011b). Subject objects. Feminist Theory, 12(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700111404205
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L., Chocontá-Piraquive, A., & Pérez-Bustos, T. (2020). A Carrier Bag Theory of More than Listening. Participation(s) Otherwise (Vol 3): 16th Participatory Design Conference, 461–471.
dc.relation.referencesTaussig, M. (2007). Tactility and Distraction. En M. Lock & J. Farquhar (Eds.), Beyond the Body Proper (pp. 259–265). Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesTeague, L., & Seiler Baldinger, A. (1996). Textiles: A Classification of Techniques. American Antiquity, 61, 634. https://doi.org/10.2307/281874
dc.relation.referencesTsing, A. L. (2009). Supply chains and the human condition. Rethinking Marxism, 21(2), 148–176.
dc.relation.referencesTsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesVan Oost, E. (2003). Materialized Gender: How Shavers Configure the Users’ Femininity and Masculinity. En N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter (pp. 193–208). MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesVásquez Maestre, M. (2011). Hibridación cultural del tejido wayúu comercializado en el malecón de Riohacha, en la Guajira, Colombia [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad del Magdalena]. http://repositorio.unimagdalena.edu.co/jspui/handle/123456789/148
dc.relation.referencesVerran, H. (2002). A Postcolonial Moment in Science Studies: Alternative Firing Regimes of Environmental Scientists and Aboriginal Landowners. Social Studies of Science, 32(5–6), 729–762.
dc.relation.referencesVerran, H., & Christie, M. (2011). Doing Difference Together Towards a Dialogue with Aboriginal Knowledge Authorities through an Australian Comparative Empirical Philosophical Inquiry. Culture and Dialogue, 1(2), 21–36.
dc.relation.referencesViveiros de Castro, E. (2004). Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 2(1), 3–22.
dc.relation.referencesWatson-Verran, H., & Turnbull, D. (1995). Knowledge Systems as Assemblages of Local Knowledge. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London: Sage, 115–139.
dc.relation.referencesWilkie, A. (2010). User Assemblages in Design: An Ethnographic Study [Goldsmiths, University of London]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/89407.pdf
dc.relation.referencesWinner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 121–136.
dc.relation.referencesWong, W. (2013). Fundamentos del diseño. Gustavo Gili.
dc.relation.referencesWynne, B. (1996). Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science. En A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science? (pp. 19–46). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesYeldan, E. (2009). On the Nature and Causes of the Collapse of the Wealth of Nations, 2007/2008: the End of a Façade Called Globalization.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalOntología política
dc.subject.proposalMaterialities
dc.subject.proposalCo-design
dc.subject.proposalMaterialidades
dc.subject.proposalWayúu
dc.subject.proposalCodiseño
dc.subject.proposalTranslation
dc.subject.proposalWayúu
dc.subject.proposalConocimiento
dc.subject.proposalKnowledge
dc.subject.proposalPolitical ontology
dc.subject.proposalTraducción
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.This document has been deposited by the author (s) under the following certificate of deposit