dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional |
dc.contributor.advisor | Rincón Valenzuela, David Alberto |
dc.contributor.author | Reyes Hernández, Lizeth Lorena |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-31T19:42:18Z |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-31T19:42:18Z |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-02 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80818 |
dc.description | ilustraciones, gráficas, tablas |
dc.description.abstract | El acto anestésico y quirúrgico conlleva al desarrollo de una serie de efectos adversos posterior a la anestesia, comúnmente náuseas y vómito, dolor, escalofríos, etc. Tanto el personal médico como los pacientes pueden tener una percepción diferente basado en juicios propios y experiencias de cual de estos, deberían ser evitados,en busqueda de la calidad de la atención médica resulta oportuno una atención personalizada enfocada a las necesidades de cada paciente, con el fin satisfacer las necesidades interindividuales. Objetivo: Reconocer los efectos adversos menos deseables dentro de un grupo de pacientes sometidos a cirugía electiva con el fin de evaluar y tomar decisiones basados en las preferencias de los pacientes. Métodos y diseño: Estudio primario, observacional, descriptivo, prospectivo. De acuedo con el protocolo establecido y emienda correspondiente, se realizó recolección de datos en preparación de salas de cirugía, en un formato de recolección virtual tipo encuesta, estuvo dividida en 3 partes, la primera de esta fueron datos socio-demográficos, en la segunda se interrogó sobre la presencia o no de cirugías previas, la presentación de síntomas indeseables, en la última sección se describieron de manera breve nueve síntomas indeseables postoperatorio y se pregunto la disposición a pagara por cada uno de ellos según la preferencia de los pacientes, el valor total hipotético a pagar eran 100.000 pesos. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 106 encuestas, del total de pacientes recogidos 76.1% (n=80) eran de sexo femenino y 23.8% (n=25) eran de sexo femenino, la mediana de la edad general fue de 47.9; en cuanto a la escolaridad el 9.5% (n= 10) había cursado primaria, 31.4% (n=33) había cursado secundaria, el 20.9% (n=22) eran técnicos, 38% (n=40) eran profesionales, respecto al estado civil el 52.1% (n=37) eran casados, el 33% (n=24) vivían en unión libre, el 4.2% (n=3) eran viudos y el 9.8% (n=7) eran separados, dentro de la muestra el 82.8% (n=87) habían sido operados previamente y 17.1% (n=18)no habían tenido intervenciones quirúrgicas, de los paciente previamente intervenidos el síntoma postanestésico más frecuentemente referido fue el escalofrió, en este estudio los pacientes tuvieron una disposición a pagar más alta por el dolor, seguido en orden por recordar intraoperatorio, vómito, náuseas, cefalea, mialgias, escalofríos, odinofagía y por último somnolencia, en el análisis por subgrupos no se evidencio cambios en el ranking por edad, sexo ni escolaridad. Conclusiones: Conocer las preferencias y preocupaciones respecto a los síntomas postanestésicos de los pacientes previamente a un procedimiento quirúrgico es una herramienta útil en el preoperatorio con el fin de definir los síntomas desagradables que más generan preocupación en cada paciente, hacer un plan anestésico individualizado abordando sus preferencias y obteniendo mayor satisfacción de la atención recibida. (Texto tomado de la fuente). |
dc.description.abstract | The anesthetic and surgical act leads to the development of a series of adverse effects after anesthesia, commonly nausea and vomiting, pain, chills, etc. Both medical staff and patients may have a different perception based on their own judgments and experiences of which of these should be avoided, in search of quality medical care, personalized attention focused on the needs of each patient is appropriate, with in order to satisfy interindividual needs. Objective: Recognize less desirable side effects within a group of patients undergoing elective surgery in order to assess and make decisions based on patient preferences. Methods and design: Primary, observational, descriptive, prospective study. In accordance with the established protocol and corresponding amendment, data collection was carried out in preparation for operating rooms, in a survey-type virtual collection format, it was divided into 3 parts, the first of which was sociodemographic data, in the second it was questioned about the presence or not of previous surgeries, the presentation of undesirable symptoms, in the last section nine undesirable postoperative symptoms were briefly described and the willingness to pay for each one of them was asked according to the preference of the patients, the total value hypothetical to pay was 100,000 pesos. Results: 106 surveys were obtained, of the total number of patients collected, 76.1% (n=80) were female and 23.8% (n=25) were female, the general median age was 47.9; Regarding schooling, 9.5% (n= 10) had completed primary school, 31.4% (n=33) had completed secondary school, 20.9% (n=22) were technicians, 38% (n=40) were professionals, with respect to Regarding marital status, 52.1% (n=37) were married, 33% (n=24) lived in a free union, 4.2% (n=3) were widowed and 9.8% (n=7) were separated, within Of the sample, 82.8% (n=87) had been previously operated on and 17.1% (n=18) had not had surgery. Of the patients previously operated on, the most frequently reported post-anesthetic symptom was chills. In this study, the patients had a higher willingness to pay by pain, followed in order by intraoperative recall, vomiting, nausea, headache, myalgia, chills, odynophagia and lastly drowsiness, in the analysis by subgroups there was no evidence of changes in the ranking by age, sex or schooling. Conclusions: Knowing the preferences and concerns regarding the post-anesthetic symptoms of patients prior to a surgical procedure is a useful tool in the in the preoperative period in order to define the unpleasant symptoms that most cause concern in each patient, make an individualized anesthetic plan addressing their preferences and obtain greater satisfaction with the care received. |
dc.format.extent | 45 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf |
dc.language.iso | spa |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
dc.subject.ddc | 610 - Medicina y salud::613 - Salud y seguridad personal |
dc.title | Importancia de los efectos adversos postanestésicos, ¿cuáles deberíamos evitar? Perspectiva de los pacientes en un Hospital Universitario de Bogotá, Colombia |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Especialidad Médica |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Anestesiología y Reanimación |
dc.description.notes | Incluye anexos |
dc.coverage.city | Bogotá |
dc.coverage.country | Colombia |
dc.description.degreelevel | Especialidades Médicas |
dc.description.degreename | Especialista en Anestesiología y Reanimación |
dc.description.methods | Estudio primario, observacional, descriptivo, prospectivo |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
dc.publisher.department | Departamento de Cirugía |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Medicina |
dc.publisher.place | Bogotá, Colombia |
dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
dc.relation.indexed | Bireme |
dc.relation.references | (1) Engoren, M., & Steffel, C. (2000). Patient perception of monetary value to avoiding unpleasant side effects of anesthesia and surgery. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 12(5), 388–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(00)00178-1 |
dc.relation.references | (2) Macario, A., Weinger, M., Carney, S., & Kim, A. (1999). Which Clinical Anesthesia Outcomes Are Important to Avoid? The Perspective of Patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 89(3), 652. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199909000-00022 |
dc.relation.references | (3) Rashiq, S., & Bray, P. (2003). Relative value to surgical patients and anesthesia providers of selected anesthesia related outcomes. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-3-1 |
dc.relation.references | (4) Ripollés-Melchor, J., Chappell, D., Espinosa, Mhyten, M. G., Abad-Gurumeta, A., Bergese, S. D., Casans-Francés, R., & Calvo-Vecino, J. M. (2017). Perioperative fluid therapy recommendations for major abdominal surgery. Via RICA recommendations revisited. Part I: Physiological background. Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion, 64(6), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2017.02.008 |
dc.relation.references | (5) Jenkins, K., Grady, D., Wong, J., Correa, R., Armanious, S., & Chung, F. (2001). Post-operative recovery: Day surgery patients’ preferences. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 86(2), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/86.2.272 |
dc.relation.references | (6) Kellner, D. B., Urman, R. D., Greenberg, P., & Brovman, E. Y. (2018). Analysis of adverse outcomes in the post-anesthesia care unit based on anesthesia liability data. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 50(June), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.038 |
dc.relation.references | (7) Moro, E. T., Godoy, R. C. S., Goulart, A. P., Muniz, L., & Modolo, N. S. P. (2009). Main Concerns of Patients Regarding the Most Common Complications in the Post-Anesthetic Care Unit. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, 59(6), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-7094(09)70096-0 |
dc.relation.references | (8) Nightingale, P. (2014). Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia in the United Kingdom and Ireland. In Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (Vol. 44, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2014.408 |
dc.relation.references | (9) Pavão, A. L. B., Mattos, S., Silva, E., Laguardia, J., Doellinger, V., Curi, E., Casali, T., Takaschima, A., Almeida, A., Albuquerque, M., & Nunes, R. (2019). Adverse events in anesthesiology: analysis based on the Logbook tool used by specializing physicians in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition), 69(5), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2019.06.006 |
dc.relation.references | (10) Gan, T. J., Sloan, F., El-Moalem, H. E., & Lubarsky, D. A. (2001). 2001Tong-how much to pay.pdf. 4, 393–400. |
dc.relation.references | (11) Shevde K, Panagopoulos G. A survey of 800 patients' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1991 Aug;73(2):190-8. |
dc.relation.references | 12) Pandit JJ, Andrade J, Bogod DG, Hitchman JM, Jonker WR, Lucas N, Mackay JH, Nimmo AF, O'Connor K, O'Sullivan EP, Paul RG, Palmer JH, Plaat F, Radcliffe JJ, Sury MR, Torevell HE, Wang M, Hainsworth J, Cook TM; Royal College of Anaesthetists; Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;113(4):549-59. |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject.decs | Anesthesia |
dc.subject.decs | Anestesia |
dc.subject.decs | Relaciones Médico-Paciente |
dc.subject.decs | Physician-Patient Relations |
dc.subject.lemb | Anesthesics - Side effects |
dc.subject.lemb | Anestésicos-Efectos colaterales |
dc.subject.proposal | Satisfacción |
dc.subject.proposal | Preferencias |
dc.subject.proposal | Eefectos adversos postanestésicos |
dc.subject.proposal | Postanesthetic adverse effects |
dc.subject.proposal | Preferences |
dc.subject.proposal | Satisfaction |
dc.title.translated | Importance of post-anesthetic adverse effects, which should we avoid? Perspective of patients in a University Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa |
dc.type.content | Text |
dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Público general |