Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorVera Diettes, Kelly Johanna
dc.contributor.authorVerdugo Moreno, Diego Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-14T20:08:07Z
dc.date.available2024-11-14T20:08:07Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/87179
dc.descriptionilustraciones, graficas, tablas
dc.description.abstractLa presente investigación busca analizar los procesos cognitivos relacionados con la creación de categorías fonológicas para inglés como L2 por parte de aprendices tardíos nativos de español. Para esto se toman como principales referentes teóricos a 3 modelos de aprendizaje de la fonología en una segunda lengua: primero, el modelo imán de la lengua materna (NLM); segundo, el modelo de aprendizaje de habla (SLM); tercero, el modelo de asimilación perceptiva (PAM). Estos modelos coinciden en que para considerar un hablante como competente es necesario que perciba y produzca de forma adecuada, por eso, esta investigación realiza una medición objetiva de estas habilidades en una población de diez hablantes bilingües con edades comprendidas entre los 18 y los 30 años, de dominancia diestra, con español como lengua materna e inglés como L2, quienes aprendieron su L2 en edades posteriores a la adolescencia. La producción se evalúa mediante el análisis acústico del espectrograma de algunas vocales generadas ante diferentes tareas como denominación o lectura de palabras y pseudopalabras, técnicas que han sido ampliamente utilizadas en los estudios de fonología en segunda lengua. La percepción es evaluada a través del análisis fisiológico mediante la medición de la dirección de la primera fijación y la duración de las fijaciones medidas con el Eye Tracking en pruebas de discriminación auditiva con pares mínimos vocálicos como estímulos. Esta técnica permite identificar el grado de atención que se le da a determinado estímulo. Finalmente, se realiza una correlación entre el análisis acústico, el análisis, fisiológico y las pruebas conductuales con el fin de determinar si se han creado nuevas categorías para las vocales del inglés como L2. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractThis research aims to analyze the cognitive processes related to the creation of phonological categories for English as a second language (L2) by late learners who are native Spanish speakers. For this purpose, the study draws primarily on three theoretical models of second language phonological learning: first, the Native Language Magnet Model (NLM); second, the Speech Learning Model (SLM); and third, the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM). These models agree that for a speaker to be considered competent, they must be able to perceive and produce speech accurately. Therefore, this research conducts an objective measurement of these abilities in a population of ten bilingual speakers aged 18 to 30, all right-handed, with Spanish as their native language and English as their L2, who learned their L2 after adolescence. Production is evaluated through acoustic analysis of the spectrogram of certain vowels generated in response to tasks such as naming or reading words and pseudowords—techniques widely used in second language phonology studies. Perception is assessed through physiological analysis, measuring the direction of the first fixation and the duration of fixations using Eye Tracking in auditory discrimination tests with minimal vowel pairs as stimuli. This technique allows for the identification of the degree of attention given to a particular stimulus. Finally, a correlation is made between the acoustic analysis, the physiological analysis, and the behavioral tests in order to determine whether new categories for English L2 vowels have been created.
dc.format.extent96 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc410 - Lingüística::414 - Fonología y fonética de formas estándar de lenguajes
dc.titleAnálisis fisiológico y acústico de adquisición fonológica de inglés como L2 en aprendices tardíos nativos de español
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Lingüística
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Lingüística
dc.description.methodsLa investigación se enmarca en el paradigma cuantitativo, con un diseño experimental que permite un análisis y comparación de los datos obtenidos a través de las distintas pruebas. Además, para el análisis de la percepción se sigue la lógica del paradigma del mundo visual, metodología que integra el procesamiento visual con diferentes sentidos y que ha mostrado ser efectiva en el estudio de diferentes aspectos del lenguaje.
dc.description.researchareaBilingüismo y contacto
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanas
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAleksandrov, A. A., Memetova, K. S., Stankevich, L. N., & Uplisova, K. O. (2017).Effects of Russian-Language Word Frequency on Mismatch Negativity. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology,47 (9), 1043-1050 doi:10.1007/s11055- 017-0510-3.
dc.relation.referencesAnabalón, R., & Vivanco, C. (2014). Análisis de desviaciones en la pronunciación de segmentos consonánticos producidas por hablantes de español de chile aprendientes de inglés. Lenguas Modernas, 43 (1), 11-25.
dc.relation.referencesAoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: the case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 233–250. doi:10.1016/s0095- 4470(03)00036-6
dc.relation.referencesBassetti, B., & Atkinson, N. (2015). Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 67-91. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1017/S0142716414000435
dc.relation.referencesBest, C.T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. En W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and linguistic experience: Issues in crosslanguage speech research (pp. 172-206). Timonium, MD: York Press.
dc.relation.referencesBest, C. T., Bradlow, A. R., Guion-Anderson, S., & Polka, L. (2011). Using the lens of phonetic experience to resolve phonological forms. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 453–455. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.006.
dc.relation.referencesBest, C. T., & Hallé, P. A. (2010). Perception of initial obstruent voicing is influenced by gestural organization. Journal of Phonetics, 38(1), 109–126. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2009.09.001
dc.relation.referencesBest, C. T., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O. S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Second- language Speech Learning: The Role of Language Experience in Speech Perception and Production. A Festschrift in Honour of James E. Flege (pp.13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
dc.relation.referencesBoersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2018) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.37, retrieved 14 March 2018 from http://www.praat.org/
dc.relation.referencesBühler, J. C., Schmid, S., & Maurer, U. (2016). Influence of dialect use on speech perception: a mismatch negativity study. Language, cognition and neuroscience, doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1272704.
dc.relation.referencesBUNDGAARD-NIELSEN, R. L., BEST, C. T., & TYLER, M. D. (2010). Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(01), 51– 67. doi:10.1017/s0142716410000287
dc.relation.referencesCatherine T. Best, Louis M. Goldstein, Hosung Nam & Michael D. Tyler (2016) Articulating What Infants Attune to in Native Speech, Ecological Psychology, 28:4, 216-261, DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2016.1230372
dc.relation.referencesCorrea, M. (2011). La enseñanza de fonética y fonología a través de analogías y metáforas. Hispana, 94 (2), 110-121. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032176.
dc.relation.referencesDesmeules-Trudel, F., & Brunelle, M. (2018). Phonotactic restrictions condition the realization of vowel nasality and nasal coarticulation: Duration and airflow measurements in Québécois French and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 69, 43-61.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., Escera, C., & Sebastiãn-Gallés, N. (2016). Variability in L2 phonemic learning originates from speech-specific capabilities: An MMN study on late bilinguals. Bilingualism, 19(5), 955-970.
dc.relation.referencesDomahs, U., Kehrein, W., Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). Event-related potentials reflecting the processing of phonological constraint violations. Language and Speech, 52, 415-35. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.unal.edu.co/docview/89071351?accountid=150292
dc.relation.referencesEscudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585.
dc.relation.referencesFaris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non- native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2018.05.003
dc.relation.referencesFInch F. D. & Ortiz, H. (1982). A course in english phonetics for spanish speakers. London : Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 692–707. doi:10.1121/1.391256
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E. (1991). The Interlingual Identification of Spanish and English Vowels: Orthographic Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(3), 701–731. doi:10.1080/14640749108400993
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. En W. Strange (Ed.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross- language research (pp. 229-273), Timonium, MD: York Press
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. En A. MEyer, & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 319- 355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987. doi:10.1121/1.428116
dc.relation.referencesMendousse, K. (2011). Towards a mental representation of vowel height in SSBE speakers. International Journal of English Studies, 12 (1), 1-16.
dc.relation.referencesFrenck-Mestre, C., Meunier, C., Espesser, R., Daffner, K., & Holcomb, P. (2005). Perceiving nonnative vowels: The effect of context on perception as evidenced by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1496-510. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.unal.edu.co/docview/232340964?accountid=150292 28.
dc.relation.referencesGuion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–2724. doi:10.1121/1.428657
dc.relation.referencesHodson, B. W., & Paden, E. P. (1981). Phonological Processes Which Characterize Unintelligible and Intelligible Speech in Early Childhood. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(4), 369. doi:10.1044/jshd.4604.369.
dc.relation.referencesInceoglu, S. (2016). Effects of perceptual training on second language vowel perception and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1175-1199. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1017/S0142716415000533
dc.relation.referencesIverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (2000). Perceptual magnet and phoneme boundary effects in speech perception: Do they arise from a common mechanism? Perception & Psychophysics, 62(4), 874–886. doi:10.3758/bf03206929
dc.relation.referencesIverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87(1), B47–B57. doi:10.1016/s0010- 0277(02)00198-1
dc.relation.referencesKissling, E. M. (2015). Phonetics instruction improves learners’ perception of L2 sounds. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 254–275. https://doi- org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1177/1362168814541735
dc.relation.referencesKivistö-de, S. H. (2015). Phonological Awareness and Pronunciation in a Second Language (tesis doctoral). University of Barcelona, Barcelona España.
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P. K. (1993). Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: The native language magnet theory. In B. deBoysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. McNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 259-274). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P. K. (2000a). Language, mind, and brain: Experience alters perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 99-115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P.K. (2000b). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11850-11857
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1493), 979–1000. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2154
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P. k., & Meltzoff, A. (1996). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 2425-2438
dc.relation.referencesLadefoged, P. & Johnson, K. (2011). A Course in Phonetics, Sixth Edition . Boston: Wadsworth.
dc.relation.referencesMarklund, E., Lacerda, F., & Schwarz, I. C. (2018). Using rotated speech to approximate the acoustic mismatch negativity response to speech. Brain and Language, 176, 26- 35 tomado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.006.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud Protección Social. (19 de marzo de 2024). Ciclo de vida. Obtenido de https://www.minsalud.gov.co/proteccionsocial/Paginas/cicloVida.aspx
dc.relation.referencesMorrison, G. S. (2008). L1-spanish speakers' acquisition of the english /i /--/I/ contrast: Duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage. Language and Speech, 51(4), 285-315. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1177/0023830908099067
dc.relation.referencesMorrison, G. S. (2009). L1-spanish speakers' acquisition of the english /i /--/I/ contrast II: perception of vowel inherent spectral change. Language and Speech, 52(4), 437- 462.
dc.relation.referencesNäätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., ... & Alho, K. (1997). “Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses,” Nature, 385, 432–434
dc.relation.referencesOlsen, M. K (2016). Limitations of the influence of english phonetics and phonology on l2 spanish rhotics. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 5 (2), 313-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/1.5.2.3898
dc.relation.referencesOrduz, N. Y. (2012). La transferencia de la fonología de la lengua materna en la adquisición del inglés como lengua extranjera. Entornos, 25, 91-103.
dc.relation.referencesOwens, R. E. (2003). Desarrollo del Lenguaje, Quinta edición. Madrid: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN. Redondo, V. B. (2015). Aproximación a la percepción de las consonantes inglesas por aprendices de l2: beneficios del entrenamiento auditivo intensivo (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla España.
dc.relation.referencesRello, L. (2007). la relación entre fonética y fonología. Universidad complutense de Madrid. Madrid, España.
dc.relation.referencesRochet, B (1995). Perception and production of L2 speech sounds by adults. In: Winifred Strange (ed.) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, 379-410. Timonium, MD: York Press.
dc.relation.referencesSalesa, B. E., Perelló, S. e., & Bonavida, E. A. (2013). Tratado de audiología, segunda edición. España: MASSON.
dc.relation.referencesSo, C.K. & Best, C.T. (2011). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech 53(2): 273-293.
dc.relation.referencesSR Research Ltd., (2005), EyeLink 1000 User Manual. http://sr- research.jp/support/EyeLink%201000%20User%20Manual%201.5.0.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSR Research Ltd. (2017). EyeLink Experiment Builder (Versión 2.1.140). [Software].
dc.relation.referencesSR Research Ltd. URL. https://www.sr-research.com/experiment-builder/
dc.relation.referencesSR Research Ltd. (2017). EyeLink Data Viewer (Versión 3.1). [Software]. SR Research Ltd. URL. https://www.sr-research.com/data-viewer/
dc.relation.referencesStach, B. A. (2010). Clinical audiology: an introduction, Second edition. New York United States of America: Delmar.
dc.relation.referencesSokal, R.R. and Rohlf. F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman. New York.
dc.relation.referencesSusanibar F., Dioses A., &Huamaní O. (2013). Fundamentos para la evaluación de las alteraciones del habla de origen fonético – fonológico. . In. Susanibar F, Parra D, Dioses A. Motricidad Orofacial: Fundamentos basados en evidencia. drid. EOS.
dc.relation.referencesTanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632-1634.
dc.relation.referencesTampas, J. W., Harkrider, A. W., & Hedrick, M. S. (2005). Neurophysiological indices of speech and nonspeech stimulus processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1147-64. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.unal.edu.co/docview/232341140?accountid=150292
dc.relation.referencesTrecca, F., Bleses, D., Madsen, T. O., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Does sound structure affect word learning? An eye-tracking study of Danish learning toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 180-203.
dc.relation.referencesVera, K. J. (2014). Fenómenos de reducción vocálica por hablantes colombianos de inglés como l2: un estudio acústico. Forma y función, 27, 11-43.
dc.relation.referencesWiener, S., Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2021). Effects of multitalker input and instructional method on the dimension-based statistical learning of syllable-tone combinations: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 155-180.
dc.relation.referencesZaiontz, C. (2023). Real Statistics (Versión 9.0). [Software]. Recuperado de https://www.real-statistics.com/.
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Iverson, P., Pruitt, J., Stevens, E. B., … Nemoto, I. (2009). Neural signatures of phonetic learning in adulthood: A magnetoencephalography study. NeuroImage, 46(1), 226–240. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.028.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembTRANSPORTE FISIOLOGICO DEL SODIO
dc.subject.lembVOCALES
dc.subject.lembVowels
dc.subject.lembFONETICA
dc.subject.lembPhonetics
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis acústico
dc.subject.proposalAprendices tardíos
dc.subject.proposalInglés L2
dc.subject.proposalFonología de segunda legua
dc.subject.proposalSeguimiento ocular
dc.subject.proposalAcoustic analysis
dc.subject.proposalLate learners
dc.subject.proposalSecond language phonology
dc.subject.proposalEnglish L2
dc.subject.proposalEye Tracking
dc.title.translatedPhysiological and Acoustic Analysis of Phonological Acquisition of English as a L2 in Late Learners Native of Spanish
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.This document has been deposited by the author (s) under the following certificate of deposit