Task planning implementation in cobotic workspaces
| dc.contributor.advisor | Cárdenas Herrera, Pedro Fabián | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hernández, Juan David | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cruz Vasquez, Felipe | |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002356493 Cruz Vasquez, Felipe [0002356493] | |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EXm0rsEAAAAJ Felipe Cruz Vasquez [EXm0rsEAAAAJ] | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3187-7075 Cruz Vasquez, Felipe [0009000331877075] | |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Felipe-Cruz-29 Felipe Cruz Vasquez [Felipe-Cruz-29] | |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup | Un-Robot Grupo de Plataformas Robóticas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-02T21:29:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-02T21:29:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-02-26 | |
| dc.description | ilustraciones a color, diagramas, fotografías, tablas | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | Los sistemas robóticos colaborativos (cobóticos) requieren la integración de planeación de tareas, interacción humano-robot, información del espacio de trabajo, interfaces, criterios de validación y restricciones de despliegue. En la práctica, muchas implementaciones enfatizan componentes técnicos aislados y dejan poco estructurado el proceso de implementación de punta a punta. Este trabajo propone una guía para implementar planeación de tareas en entornos cobóticos, organizada como un flujo completo que cubre etapas de diseño, codificación, alistamiento y experimento. La guía propuesta estructura el proceso de implementación desde la definición de la actividad colaborativa y el contexto del espacio de trabajo, hasta la selección de tecnologías de planeación, el diseño de la arquitectura de control, la integración de software, las pruebas en simulación, el alistamiento físico y la validación experimental. La guía busca apoyar implementaciones reproducibles y trazables en escenarios cobóticos reales, manteniendo al mismo tiempo suficiente generalidad para adaptarse a diferentes tecnologías de planeación de tareas y dominios de aplicación. Para evaluar la aplicabilidad práctica de la guía, se desarrolló un escenario cobótico controlado con una única arquitectura de control implementada y se validó mediante tres experimentos. El escenario usó una arquitectura modular con componentes de planeación de tareas, representación digital del espacio de trabajo, interacción humana y ejecución robótica. Los experimentos emplearon supuestos simplificados de planeación de movimiento para el caso de uso seleccionado y se utilizaron como evidencia de que la guía puede seguirse para obtener un sistema integrado funcional y ejecutar pruebas reales de validación. La contribución principal de este trabajo es metodológica: una guía estructurada de implementación para aplicar planeación de tareas en entornos cobóticos. La implementación reportada respalda la viabilidad de la guía en un caso real y proporciona una base para futuras réplicas, refinamientos y evaluaciones comparativas más amplias en otros entornos cobóticos. (Texto tomado de la fuente) | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | Collaborative robotic (cobotic) systems require the integration of task planning, human-robot interaction, workspace information, interfaces, validation criteria, and deployment constraints. In practice, many implementations emphasize isolated technical components while leaving the end-to-end implementation process weakly structured. This work proposes a guide for implementing task planning in cobotic workspaces, organized as a complete workflow that covers design, coding, setup, and experiment stages. The proposed guide structures the implementation process from the definition of the collaborative activity and workspace context to the selection of planning technologies, controller architecture design, software integration, simulation testing, physical setup, and experimental validation. The guide is intended to support reproducible and traceable implementations in real cobotic scenarios, while remaining sufficiently general to accommodate different task-planning technologies and application domains. To evaluate the practical applicability of the guide, one controlled cobotic workspace scenario with a single implemented controller architecture was developed and validated through three experiments. The scenario used a modular architecture with task planning, digital workspace representation, human interaction, and robot execution components. The experiments employed simplified motion-planning assumptions for the selected use case and were used as evidence that the guide can be followed to obtain a working integrated system and execute real validation trials. The main contribution of this work is methodological: a structured implementation guide for applying task planning in cobotic workspaces. The reported implementation supports the feasibility of the guide in a real case and provides a basis for future replications, refinements, and broader comparative evaluations in other cobotic environments. | eng |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Maestría | |
| dc.description.degreename | Magíster en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial | |
| dc.description.notes | https://github.com/labsir-un/Task_Planning_Cobotic | eng |
| dc.description.notes | https://github.com/labsir-un/Task_Planning_Cobotic | spa |
| dc.description.researcharea | Movimiento, aprendizaje e interacción con robots y sistemas autónomos | |
| dc.format.extent | xi, 79 páginas | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
| dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
| dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ | spa |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/90050 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | |
| dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá | |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingeniería | |
| dc.publisher.place | Bogotá, Colombia | |
| dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial | |
| dc.relation.references | [1] J. Vasconez, G. Kantor, and F. Auat, ‘‘Human-robot interaction in agriculture: A survey and current challenges,’’ J. Biosyst. Eng., vol. 179, pp. 35--48, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1537511017309625?via%3Dihub | |
| dc.relation.references | [2] K. Kosuge and Y. Hirata, ‘‘Human-robot interaction,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Biomimetics, 2004, pp. 8--11. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Human-Robot-Interaction-Kosuge-Hirata/093a045f21abb255f0d061bc743169b01f213076 | |
| dc.relation.references | [3] M. H. Zafar, E. F. Langås, and F. Sanfilippo, ‘‘Exploring the synergies between collaborative robotics, digital twins, augmentation, and industry 5.0 for smart manufacturing: A state-of-the-art review,’’ Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 89, p. 102769, 2024. | |
| dc.relation.references | [4] R. M. Oosthuizen, ‘‘Fifth industrial revolution---artificial intelligence and cobotics,’’ in Elgar Encyclopedia of Occupational Health Psychology, 2024, pp. 65--67. | |
| dc.relation.references | [5] M. M. Rahman, F. Khatun, I. Jahan, R. Devnath, and M. A.-A. Bhuiyan, ‘‘Cobotics: The evolving roles and prospects of next-generation collaborative robots in industry 5.0,’’ J. Robotics, vol. 2024, p. 2918089, 2024. | |
| dc.relation.references | [6] L. Kavraki, ‘‘Planning beyond motion planning,’’ Keynote speech at IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, May 2018. | |
| dc.relation.references | [7] M. Ghallab, D. Nau, and P. Traverso, Automated Planning and Acting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/automated-planning-and-acting/E6DE5715A2190651352DFB0869916BC3 | |
| dc.relation.references | [8] R. Zhao, S. Tao, and P. Li, ‘‘Safety-efficiency integrated assembly: The next-stage adaptive task allocation and planning framework for human--robot collaboration,’’ Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 94, p. 102942, 2025. | |
| dc.relation.references | [9] I. A. Şucan, M. Moll, and L. E. Kavraki, ‘‘The open motion planning library,’’ IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 72--82, 2012. | |
| dc.relation.references | [10] L. Kavraki, ‘‘Planning in robotics and beyond,’’ Plenary talk at IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), 2020, virtual Conference. | |
| dc.relation.references | [11] Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), ‘‘The planning wiki,’’ https://planning.wiki, accessed: 2025-06-24. | |
| dc.relation.references | [12] D. Meli, H. Nakawala, and P. Fiorini, ‘‘Logic programming for deliberative robotic task planning,’’ Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 9011--9049, 2023. | |
| dc.relation.references | [13] F. Duan, W. Li, and Y. Tan, Intelligent Robot: Implementation and Applications. Springer, 2023. | |
| dc.relation.references | [14] Open Robotics, ‘‘ROS 2 Documentation,’’ https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/, official documentation. | |
| dc.relation.references | [15] Q. Cai, J. Han, X. Zhou, S. Zhao, L. Li, H. Liu, C. Xu, J. Chen, C. Liu, and H. Zhu, ‘‘A comprehensive review of human-robot collaborative manufacturing systems: Technologies, applications, and future trends,’’ Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 515, 2026. | |
| dc.relation.references | [16] S. Kim, J. R. Anthis, and S. S. Sebo, ‘‘A taxonomy of robot autonomy for human-robot interaction,’’ in Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’24). Boulder, CO, USA: ACM, Mar. 2024, pp. 381--393. | |
| dc.relation.references | [17] P. B. Rodrigues, R. Singh, M. Oytuna, P. Adami, P. J. Woods, B. Becerik-Gerber, L. Soibelman, Y. Copur-Gencturk, and G. M. Lucas, ‘‘A multidimensional taxonomy for human-robot interaction in construction,’’ Automation in Construction, vol. 150, p. 104845, 2023. | |
| dc.relation.references | [18] International Organization for Standardization, ‘‘ISO 10218-1:2025 Robotics --- Safety requirements for industrial robots --- Part 1: Industrial robots,’’ https://www.iso.org/standard/73933.html, 2025, official ISO page. | |
| dc.relation.references | [19] International Organization for Standardization, ‘‘ISO 10218-2:2025 Robotics --- Safety requirements for industrial robots --- Part 2: Industrial robot applications and robot cells,’’ https://www.iso.org/standard/73934.html, 2025, official ISO page. | |
| dc.relation.references | [20] International Organization for Standardization, ‘‘ISO/TS 15066:2016 Robots and robotic devices --- Collaborative robots,’’ https://www.iso.org/standard/62996.html, 2016, official ISO page. | |
| dc.relation.references | [21] M. Lorenzini, M. Lagomarsino, L. Fortini, S. Gholami, and A. Ajoudani, ‘‘Ergonomic human-robot collaboration in industry: A review,’’ Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 9, p. 813907, 2023. | |
| dc.relation.references | [22] E. Coronado, T. Kiyokawa, G. A. Garcia Ricardez, I. G. Ramirez-Alpizar, G. Venture, and N. Yamanobe, ‘‘Evaluating quality in human-robot interaction: A systematic search and classification of performance and human-centered factors, measures and metrics towards an industry 5.0,’’ Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 63, pp. 392--410, 2022. | |
| dc.relation.references | [23] M. A. Goodrich and D. R. Olsen, Jr., ‘‘Metrics for evaluating human-robot interactions,’’ in Proc. NIST Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS) Workshop, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2003. | |
| dc.relation.references | [24] Z. Kootbally, C. Schlenoff, C. Lawler, T. Kramer, and S. K. Gupta, ‘‘Towards robust assembly with knowledge representation for the planning domain definition language (pddl),’’ Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 33, pp. 42--55, 2015. | |
| dc.relation.references | [25] C. R. Garrett, R. Chitnis, R. Holladay, B. Kim, T. Silver, L. P. Kaelbling, and T. Lozano-Pérez, ‘‘Integrated task and motion planning,’’ Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 4, pp. 265--293, 2021. | |
| dc.relation.references | [26] PlanSys2 Contributors, ‘‘PlanSys2 Documentation,’’ https://plansys2.github.io/, official documentation. | |
| dc.relation.references | [27] Eclipse ESCET Project, ‘‘Eclipse ESCET: CIF Documentation,’’ https://eclipse.dev/escet/cif/, official documentation. | |
| dc.relation.references | [28] pygame community, ‘‘pygame documentation,’’ https://www.pygame.org/docs/, official documentation. | |
| dc.relation.references | [29] Vosk Project, ‘‘Vosk Speech Recognition Toolkit,’’ https://alphacephei.com/vosk/, project documentation. | |
| dc.relation.references | [30] Rhasspy Project, ‘‘Piper Text-to-Speech,’’ https://github.com/rhasspy/piper, project repository and documentation. | |
| dc.relation.references | [31] ABB, ‘‘RobotStudio,’’ https://new.abb.com/products/robotics/robotstudio, official product and documentation entry point. | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.license | Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería | |
| dc.subject.proposal | Cobotic workspace | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Task planning | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | PDDL | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Implementation methodology | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Entorno cobótico | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Planeación de tareas | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | PDDL | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Metodología de implementación | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Programación informática | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Computer programming | eng |
| dc.subject.unesco | Robótica | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Robotics | eng |
| dc.subject.unesco | Interacción hombre-máquina | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Human machine interaction | eng |
| dc.title | Task planning implementation in cobotic workspaces | eng |
| dc.title.translated | Implementación de planeación de tareas en entornos cobóticos | spa |
| dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Maestría | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc | |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |
| dc.type.content | Text | |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis | |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM | |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | |
| dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Estudiantes | |
| dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Investigadores | |
| dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Maestros | |
| oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- DocumentoFinal1020841890.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 25.06 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial

