Task planning implementation in cobotic workspaces

dc.contributor.advisorCárdenas Herrera, Pedro Fabián
dc.contributor.advisorHernández, Juan David
dc.contributor.authorCruz Vasquez, Felipe
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0002356493 Cruz Vasquez, Felipe [0002356493]
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EXm0rsEAAAAJ Felipe Cruz Vasquez [EXm0rsEAAAAJ]
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-3187-7075 Cruz Vasquez, Felipe [0009000331877075]
dc.contributor.researchgatehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Felipe-Cruz-29 Felipe Cruz Vasquez [Felipe-Cruz-29]
dc.contributor.researchgroupUn-Robot­ Grupo de Plataformas Robóticas
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-02T21:29:08Z
dc.date.available2026-06-02T21:29:08Z
dc.date.issued2026-02-26
dc.descriptionilustraciones a color, diagramas, fotografías, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractLos sistemas robóticos colaborativos (cobóticos) requieren la integración de planeación de tareas, interacción humano-robot, información del espacio de trabajo, interfaces, criterios de validación y restricciones de despliegue. En la práctica, muchas implementaciones enfatizan componentes técnicos aislados y dejan poco estructurado el proceso de implementación de punta a punta. Este trabajo propone una guía para implementar planeación de tareas en entornos cobóticos, organizada como un flujo completo que cubre etapas de diseño, codificación, alistamiento y experimento. La guía propuesta estructura el proceso de implementación desde la definición de la actividad colaborativa y el contexto del espacio de trabajo, hasta la selección de tecnologías de planeación, el diseño de la arquitectura de control, la integración de software, las pruebas en simulación, el alistamiento físico y la validación experimental. La guía busca apoyar implementaciones reproducibles y trazables en escenarios cobóticos reales, manteniendo al mismo tiempo suficiente generalidad para adaptarse a diferentes tecnologías de planeación de tareas y dominios de aplicación. Para evaluar la aplicabilidad práctica de la guía, se desarrolló un escenario cobótico controlado con una única arquitectura de control implementada y se validó mediante tres experimentos. El escenario usó una arquitectura modular con componentes de planeación de tareas, representación digital del espacio de trabajo, interacción humana y ejecución robótica. Los experimentos emplearon supuestos simplificados de planeación de movimiento para el caso de uso seleccionado y se utilizaron como evidencia de que la guía puede seguirse para obtener un sistema integrado funcional y ejecutar pruebas reales de validación. La contribución principal de este trabajo es metodológica: una guía estructurada de implementación para aplicar planeación de tareas en entornos cobóticos. La implementación reportada respalda la viabilidad de la guía en un caso real y proporciona una base para futuras réplicas, refinamientos y evaluaciones comparativas más amplias en otros entornos cobóticos. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractCollaborative robotic (cobotic) systems require the integration of task planning, human-robot interaction, workspace information, interfaces, validation criteria, and deployment constraints. In practice, many implementations emphasize isolated technical components while leaving the end-to-end implementation process weakly structured. This work proposes a guide for implementing task planning in cobotic workspaces, organized as a complete workflow that covers design, coding, setup, and experiment stages. The proposed guide structures the implementation process from the definition of the collaborative activity and workspace context to the selection of planning technologies, controller architecture design, software integration, simulation testing, physical setup, and experimental validation. The guide is intended to support reproducible and traceable implementations in real cobotic scenarios, while remaining sufficiently general to accommodate different task-planning technologies and application domains. To evaluate the practical applicability of the guide, one controlled cobotic workspace scenario with a single implemented controller architecture was developed and validated through three experiments. The scenario used a modular architecture with task planning, digital workspace representation, human interaction, and robot execution components. The experiments employed simplified motion-planning assumptions for the selected use case and were used as evidence that the guide can be followed to obtain a working integrated system and execute real validation trials. The main contribution of this work is methodological: a structured implementation guide for applying task planning in cobotic workspaces. The reported implementation supports the feasibility of the guide in a real case and provides a basis for future replications, refinements, and broader comparative evaluations in other cobotic environments.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial
dc.description.noteshttps://github.com/labsir-un/Task_Planning_Coboticeng
dc.description.noteshttps://github.com/labsir-un/Task_Planning_Coboticspa
dc.description.researchareaMovimiento, aprendizaje e interacción con robots y sistemas autónomos
dc.format.extentxi, 79 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/90050
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial
dc.relation.references[1] J. Vasconez, G. Kantor, and F. Auat, ‘‘Human-robot interaction in agriculture: A survey and current challenges,’’ J. Biosyst. Eng., vol. 179, pp. 35--48, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1537511017309625?via%3Dihub
dc.relation.references[2] K. Kosuge and Y. Hirata, ‘‘Human-robot interaction,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Biomimetics, 2004, pp. 8--11. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Human-Robot-Interaction-Kosuge-Hirata/093a045f21abb255f0d061bc743169b01f213076
dc.relation.references[3] M. H. Zafar, E. F. Langås, and F. Sanfilippo, ‘‘Exploring the synergies between collaborative robotics, digital twins, augmentation, and industry 5.0 for smart manufacturing: A state-of-the-art review,’’ Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 89, p. 102769, 2024.
dc.relation.references[4] R. M. Oosthuizen, ‘‘Fifth industrial revolution---artificial intelligence and cobotics,’’ in Elgar Encyclopedia of Occupational Health Psychology, 2024, pp. 65--67.
dc.relation.references[5] M. M. Rahman, F. Khatun, I. Jahan, R. Devnath, and M. A.-A. Bhuiyan, ‘‘Cobotics: The evolving roles and prospects of next-generation collaborative robots in industry 5.0,’’ J. Robotics, vol. 2024, p. 2918089, 2024.
dc.relation.references[6] L. Kavraki, ‘‘Planning beyond motion planning,’’ Keynote speech at IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, May 2018.
dc.relation.references[7] M. Ghallab, D. Nau, and P. Traverso, Automated Planning and Acting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/automated-planning-and-acting/E6DE5715A2190651352DFB0869916BC3
dc.relation.references[8] R. Zhao, S. Tao, and P. Li, ‘‘Safety-efficiency integrated assembly: The next-stage adaptive task allocation and planning framework for human--robot collaboration,’’ Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 94, p. 102942, 2025.
dc.relation.references[9] I. A. Şucan, M. Moll, and L. E. Kavraki, ‘‘The open motion planning library,’’ IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 72--82, 2012.
dc.relation.references[10] L. Kavraki, ‘‘Planning in robotics and beyond,’’ Plenary talk at IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), 2020, virtual Conference.
dc.relation.references[11] Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), ‘‘The planning wiki,’’ https://planning.wiki, accessed: 2025-06-24.
dc.relation.references[12] D. Meli, H. Nakawala, and P. Fiorini, ‘‘Logic programming for deliberative robotic task planning,’’ Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 9011--9049, 2023.
dc.relation.references[13] F. Duan, W. Li, and Y. Tan, Intelligent Robot: Implementation and Applications. Springer, 2023.
dc.relation.references[14] Open Robotics, ‘‘ROS 2 Documentation,’’ https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/, official documentation.
dc.relation.references[15] Q. Cai, J. Han, X. Zhou, S. Zhao, L. Li, H. Liu, C. Xu, J. Chen, C. Liu, and H. Zhu, ‘‘A comprehensive review of human-robot collaborative manufacturing systems: Technologies, applications, and future trends,’’ Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 515, 2026.
dc.relation.references[16] S. Kim, J. R. Anthis, and S. S. Sebo, ‘‘A taxonomy of robot autonomy for human-robot interaction,’’ in Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’24). Boulder, CO, USA: ACM, Mar. 2024, pp. 381--393.
dc.relation.references[17] P. B. Rodrigues, R. Singh, M. Oytuna, P. Adami, P. J. Woods, B. Becerik-Gerber, L. Soibelman, Y. Copur-Gencturk, and G. M. Lucas, ‘‘A multidimensional taxonomy for human-robot interaction in construction,’’ Automation in Construction, vol. 150, p. 104845, 2023.
dc.relation.references[18] International Organization for Standardization, ‘‘ISO 10218-1:2025 Robotics --- Safety requirements for industrial robots --- Part 1: Industrial robots,’’ https://www.iso.org/standard/73933.html, 2025, official ISO page.
dc.relation.references[19] International Organization for Standardization, ‘‘ISO 10218-2:2025 Robotics --- Safety requirements for industrial robots --- Part 2: Industrial robot applications and robot cells,’’ https://www.iso.org/standard/73934.html, 2025, official ISO page.
dc.relation.references[20] International Organization for Standardization, ‘‘ISO/TS 15066:2016 Robots and robotic devices --- Collaborative robots,’’ https://www.iso.org/standard/62996.html, 2016, official ISO page.
dc.relation.references[21] M. Lorenzini, M. Lagomarsino, L. Fortini, S. Gholami, and A. Ajoudani, ‘‘Ergonomic human-robot collaboration in industry: A review,’’ Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 9, p. 813907, 2023.
dc.relation.references[22] E. Coronado, T. Kiyokawa, G. A. Garcia Ricardez, I. G. Ramirez-Alpizar, G. Venture, and N. Yamanobe, ‘‘Evaluating quality in human-robot interaction: A systematic search and classification of performance and human-centered factors, measures and metrics towards an industry 5.0,’’ Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 63, pp. 392--410, 2022.
dc.relation.references[23] M. A. Goodrich and D. R. Olsen, Jr., ‘‘Metrics for evaluating human-robot interactions,’’ in Proc. NIST Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS) Workshop, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2003.
dc.relation.references[24] Z. Kootbally, C. Schlenoff, C. Lawler, T. Kramer, and S. K. Gupta, ‘‘Towards robust assembly with knowledge representation for the planning domain definition language (pddl),’’ Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 33, pp. 42--55, 2015.
dc.relation.references[25] C. R. Garrett, R. Chitnis, R. Holladay, B. Kim, T. Silver, L. P. Kaelbling, and T. Lozano-Pérez, ‘‘Integrated task and motion planning,’’ Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 4, pp. 265--293, 2021.
dc.relation.references[26] PlanSys2 Contributors, ‘‘PlanSys2 Documentation,’’ https://plansys2.github.io/, official documentation.
dc.relation.references[27] Eclipse ESCET Project, ‘‘Eclipse ESCET: CIF Documentation,’’ https://eclipse.dev/escet/cif/, official documentation.
dc.relation.references[28] pygame community, ‘‘pygame documentation,’’ https://www.pygame.org/docs/, official documentation.
dc.relation.references[29] Vosk Project, ‘‘Vosk Speech Recognition Toolkit,’’ https://alphacephei.com/vosk/, project documentation.
dc.relation.references[30] Rhasspy Project, ‘‘Piper Text-to-Speech,’’ https://github.com/rhasspy/piper, project repository and documentation.
dc.relation.references[31] ABB, ‘‘RobotStudio,’’ https://new.abb.com/products/robotics/robotstudio, official product and documentation entry point.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería
dc.subject.proposalCobotic workspaceeng
dc.subject.proposalTask planningeng
dc.subject.proposalPDDLeng
dc.subject.proposalImplementation methodologyeng
dc.subject.proposalEntorno cobóticospa
dc.subject.proposalPlaneación de tareasspa
dc.subject.proposalPDDLspa
dc.subject.proposalMetodología de implementaciónspa
dc.subject.unescoProgramación informáticaspa
dc.subject.unescoComputer programming eng
dc.subject.unescoRobóticaspa
dc.subject.unescoRobotics eng
dc.subject.unescoInteracción hombre-máquinaspa
dc.subject.unescoHuman machine interactioneng
dc.titleTask planning implementation in cobotic workspaceseng
dc.title.translatedImplementación de planeación de tareas en entornos cobóticosspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
DocumentoFinal1020841890.pdf
Tamaño:
25.06 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial