Desarrollo de un modelo de mantenimiento con base en la relación costo-beneficio para baterías de ion de litio y electrónica de potencia en sistemas de almacenamiento de energía

dc.contributor.advisorCortes Guerrero, Camilo Andrés
dc.contributor.advisorRomero Quete, Andrés Arturo
dc.contributor.authorEsteban Bautista, Andres Felipe
dc.contributor.orcidEsteban Bautista, Andres Felipe [0009000790005866]
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación Emc-Un
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-12T14:11:23Z
dc.date.available2026-02-12T14:11:23Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionIlustraciones, diagramas, gráficosspa
dc.description.abstractEl presente documento propone un marco metodológico integral para optimizar decisiones de mantenimiento en un Sistema de Almacenamiento de Energía con Baterías (SAEB) a gran escala. El trabajo articula tres pilares: (i) la simulación detallada de un SAEB multi-rack que captura la interacción electro-térmica, las lógicas de control (carga/descarga, límites de potencia, sistemas de ventilación y refrigeración) y perfiles operativos realistas; (ii) la estimación de vida remanente (VR) de conversores de potencia (DC/DC) y módulos de baterías mediante algoritmos de aprendizaje automático; y (iii) la formulación de una Cadena de Markov para definir acciones de mantenimiento que maximizan el beneficio neto bajo restricciones de confiabilidad, disponibilidad y costos del ciclo de vida. A partir de la simulación generada en un proyecto de código abierto “Simses” desarrollado en Python, se genera un conjunto de datos de las variables críticas de operación (estado de carga, profundidad de descarga, corriente, temperatura, pérdidas, entre otras), así como los indicadores de salud (capacidad, resistencia interna, eficiencia de conversión). Sobre esta base, se entrenan modelos de aprendizaje automático para realizar la estimación de la VR y cuantificar la incertidumbre mediante intervalos de predicción. Con base en las estimaciones de VR, se construye la matriz de transiciones entre estados de la Cadena de Markov, cuyos estados representan bandas discretas de condición del estado de salud con base en los resultados de simulación, y acciones que incluyen mantenimiento preventivo y reemplazo del activo. La función de recompensa integra costos directos del mantenimiento y penalizaciones por indisponibilidad, donde el modelo de optimización se resuelve con iteración de valores, mostrando los intervalos óptimos de intervención por activo y escenario. Los resultados muestran que la integración de pronósticos de VR con decisión estocástica permite reducir el costo total esperado, incrementar la disponibilidad y mitigar riesgos de fallas catastróficas. La contribución central radica en un puente operativo entre analítica predictiva con la planificación de mantenimiento escalable y reproducible para entornos industriales. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThis thesis proposes a comprehensive methodological framework for optimizing maintenance decisions in a large-scale Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). The work is structured around three pillars: (i) detailed simulation of a multi-rack BESS that captures the electro-thermal interaction, control logic (charge/discharge, power limits, ventilation and cooling systems), and realistic operating profiles; (ii) estimation of the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of power converters (DC/DC) and battery modules using machine learning algorithms; and (iii) formulation of a Markov Chain to define maintenance actions that maximize net benefit under constraints of reliability, availability, and life-cycle costs. Based on the simulation generated in an open-source project, “Simses”, developed in Python, a dataset of critical operating variables (charge status, discharge depth, current, temperature, losses, among others), as well as health indicators (capacity, internal resistance, conversion efficiency), is generated. Machine learning models are trained to estimate RUL based on generated dataset and quantify uncertainty through prediction intervals. Based on the RUL estimation, the transition matrix between states of the Markov Chain is constructed. The states in this matrix represent discrete health condition bands based on the simulation results, and actions that include preventive maintenance and asset replacement are defined. The reward function integrates direct maintenance costs and downtime penalties. The optimization model is solved by iterating values, showing the optimal intervention intervals for each asset and scenario. The results show that integration of RUL forecasting with stochastic decision-making reduces total expected cost, increases availability, and mitigates the risk of catastrophic failures. The key contribution lies in establishing an operational bridge between predictive analytics and scalable, reproducible maintenance planning for industrial environments.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial
dc.description.researchareaInteligencia Computacional y Automatización Inteligente
dc.format.extentxvii, 100 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/89522
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial
dc.relation.referencesAbdolrasol, M. G., Ayob, A., Lipu, M. S., Ansari, S., Kiong, T. S., Saad, M. H. M., Ustun, T. S., and Kalam, A. (2024). Advanced data-driven fault diagnosis in lithiumion battery management systems for electric vehicles: Progress, challenges, and future perspectives. eTransportation, 22.
dc.relation.referencesAhwiadi, M. and Wang, W. (2025). Battery health monitoring and remaining useful life prediction techniques: A review of technologies. Batteries, 11.
dc.relation.referencesAl-Mohamad, A., Hoblos, G., and Puig, V. (2020). A hybrid systemlevel prognostics approach with online rul forecasting for electronics-rich systems with unknown degradation behaviors. Microelectronics Reliability, 111:113676
dc.relation.referencesApribowo, C. H. B., Sarjiya, S., Hadi, S. P., and Wijaya, F. D. (2022). Optimal planning of battery energy storage systems by considering battery degradation due to ambient temperature: A review, challenges, and new perspective. Batteries, 8
dc.relation.referencesArts, J., Boute, R. N., Loeys, S., and van Staden, H. E. (2024). Fifty years of maintenance optimization: Reflections and perspectives. European Journal of Operational Research
dc.relation.referencesBenavides, H., Simbaqueva, O., and Zapata, H. (2017). Atlas de radiación solar, ultravioleta y ozono de colombia. Reporte Técnico, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM), Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética (UPME)
dc.relation.referencesBhargava, C., Sharma, P. K., Senthilkumar, M., Padmanaban, S., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., Leonowicz, Z., Blaabjerg, F., and Mitolo, M. (2020). Review of health prognostics and condition monitoring of electronic components. IEEE Access, 8:75163–75183
dc.relation.referencesBhat, D., Muench, S., and Roellig, M. (2023). Estimation of remaining useful lifetime of power electronic components with machine learning based on mission profile data. Power Electronic Devices and Components, 5
dc.relation.referencesBoroujeni, S. M., Fill, A., Ridder, A., and Birke, K. P. (2021). Influence of temperature and electrolyte composition on the performance of lithium metal anodes. Batteries, 7
dc.relation.referencesBulow, F. V., Heinrich, F., and Paxton, W. A. (2024). The future of battery data and the state of health of lithium-ion batteries in automotive applications. Communications Engineering, 3
dc.relation.referencesCai, Y., de Jonge, B., and Teunter, R. H. (2025). Data-driven condition-based maintenance optimization given limited data. European Journal of Operational Research
dc.relation.referencesCai, Y., Yu, L., Wu, M., Lv, S., Fu, Z., Tong, W., Li, W., and Shi, S. (2024). Grid-forming control for solar generation system with battery energy storage. Energies, 17
dc.relation.referencesCamacho, O., Campillo, J., Correa, C., and Morillo, J. (2024). Plan maestro de modernización y expansión de la infraestructura de transmisión eléctrica. Reporte Técnico, Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética (UPME)
dc.relation.referencesCamacho, O., Correa, C., Martínez, J., Hernandez, L., Aldana, A., Zapata, H., Segura, A., Valles, C., Mañosca, H., and Ortiz, F. (2023). Plan indicativo de expansión de la generación 2023-2037. Reporte Técnico, Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética (UPME)
dc.relation.referencesCarne, G. D., Maroufi, S. M., Beiranvand, H., Angelis, V. D., D’Arco, S., Gevorgian, V., Waczowicz, S., Mather, B., Liserre, M., and Hagenmeyer, V. (2024). The role of energy storage systems for a secure energy supply: A comprehensive review of system needs and technology solutions. Electric Power Systems Research, 236
dc.relation.referencesCatsaros, O. (2023). Lithium-ion battery pack prices hit record low of $139/kwh. BloombergNEF. Disponible en: https://about.bnef.com/blog/lithium-ion-battery-pac k-prices-hit-record-low-of-139-kwh/
dc.relation.referencesChaturvedi, A., Sarma, M., Chaturvedi, S. K., and Bernstein, J. (2023). Performance assessment and rul prediction of power converters under the multiple components degradation. Microelectronics Reliability, 144
dc.relation.referencesChen, B., Liu, Y., and Xiao, B. (2024). A novel hybrid neural network-based soh and rul estimation method for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage, 98
dc.relation.referencesChen, D., Zhang, W., Zhang, C., Sun, B., Cong, X. W., Wei, S., and Jiang, J. (2022). A novel deep learning-based life prediction method for lithium-ion batteries with strong generalization capability under multiple cycle profiles. Applied Energy, 327
dc.relation.referencesChen, K., Luo, Y., Long, Z., Li, Y., Nie, G., Liu, K., Xin, D., Gao, G., and Wu, G. (2025). Big data-driven prognostics and health management of lithium-ion batteries:a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 214
dc.relation.referencesChen, M., Ma, G., Liu, W., Zeng, N., and Luo, X. (2023). An overview of datadriven battery health estimation technology for battery management system. Neurocomputing, 532:152–169
dc.relation.referencesChoi, D., Shamim, N., Crawford, A., Huang, Q., Vartanian, C. K., Viswanathan, V. V., Paiss, M. D., Alam, M. J. E., Reed, D. M., and Sprenkle, V. L. (2021). Li-ion battery technology for grid application. Journal of Power Sources, 511
dc.relation.referencesCollath, N., Tepe, B., Englberger, S., Jossen, A., and Hesse, H. (2022). Aging aware operation of lithium-ion battery energy storage systems: A review. Journal of Energy Storage, 55
dc.relation.referencesConzen, J., Lakshmipathy, S., Kapahi, A., Kraft, S., and DiDomizio, M. (2023). Lithium ion battery energy storage systems (bess) hazards. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 81:104932
dc.relation.referencesDemirci, O., Taskin, S., Schaltz, E., and Demirci, B. A. (2024). Review of battery state estimation methods for electric vehicles-part ii: Soh estimation. Journal of Energy Storage, 96
dc.relation.referencesDiaz, V. S., Cantane, D. A., Santos, A. Q. O., and Junior, O. H. A. (2021). Comparative analysis of degradation assessment of battery energy storage systems in pv smoothing application. Energies, 14:3600
dc.relation.referencesDissanayake, K. and Kularatna-Abeywardana, D. (2024). A review of supercapacitors: Materials, technology, challenges, and renewable energy applications. Journal of Energy Storage, 96
dc.relation.referencesDOE (2024). Global Energy Storage Database. Sandia National Laboratories. Disponible en: https://sandia.gov/ess-ssl/gesdb/public/projects.html
dc.relation.referencesDu, Z. (2023). Review of machine learning method for safety management of lithium-ion battery energy storage. E3S Web of Conferences, 385:01033
dc.relation.referencesDYNEX (2024). An6442 - igbt module failure mechanisms application note. Reporte Técnico, DYNEX SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED
dc.relation.referencesElalfy, D. A., Gouda, E., Kotb, M. F., Bureˇs, V., and Sedhom, B. E. (2024). Comprehensive review of energy storage systems technologies, objectives, challenges, and future trends. Energy Strategy Reviews, 54
dc.relation.referencesEPRI (2025). BESS Failure Incident Database. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Disponible en: https://storagewiki.epri.com/index.php/BESS_Failure_Event_ Database
dc.relation.referencesEVESCO (2022). Containerized battery energy storage system lifepo4 battery technology - es10002000s. Technical report, Electric Vehicle Energy Storage Company (EVESCO)
dc.relation.referencesFaisal, S. and Gao, C. (2024). A comprehensive review of integrated energy systems considering power-to-gas technology. Energies, 17
dc.relation.referencesFioravanti, R., Kuma, K., Nakata, S., Chalamala, B. R., and Preger, Y. (2019). Predictive-maintenance practices for operational safety of battery energy storage systems. Sandia, 8(5):55
dc.relation.referencesFioriti, D., Scarpelli, C., Pellegrino, L., Lutzemberger, G., Micolano, E., and Salamone, S. (2023). Battery lifetime of electric vehicles by novel rainflow-counting algorithm with temperature and c-rate dynamics: Effects of fast charging, user habits, vehicle-to-grid and climate zones. Journal of Energy Storage, 59:106458
dc.relation.referencesFoussard, E., Nattaf, M., Espinouse, M. L., and Mounie, G. (2024). Modeling and solving framework for tactical maintenance planning problems with health index considerations. Computers and Operations Research, 170
dc.relation.referencesGabriel, M. T., Mansour, D. E. A., Shoyama, M., and Abdelkader, S. M. (2025). Design and performance evaluation of a battery-integrated pv system utilizing tripleactive bridge based solid-state transformer topology. Journal of Energy Storage, 114
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Miguel, P. L. C., Alonso-Mart´ınez, J., G´omez, S. A., Plaza, M. G., and Asensio, A. P. (2022). A review on the degradation implementation for the operation of battery energy storage systems. Batteries, 8
dc.relation.referencesGasper, P., Collath, N., Hesse, H. C., Jossen, A., and Smith, K. (2022). Machine-learning assisted identification of accurate battery lifetime models with uncertainty. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 169:080518
dc.relation.referencesGe, M. F., Liu, Y., Jiang, X., and Liu, J. (2021). A review on state of health estimations and remaining useful life prognostics of lithium-ion batteries. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 174
dc.relation.referencesGerber, D. L., Musavi, F., Ghatpande, O. A., Frank, S. M., Poon, J., Brown, R. E., and Feng, W. (2021). A comprehensive loss model and comparison of ac and dc boost converters. Energies, 14
dc.relation.referencesHaisheng, C., Zhenhua, Y., Liu, W., Fen, Y., Na, N., Xing, Z., Jiawei, S., Chenfei, L., Jing, C., Congcong, Z., Liang, T., Zhen, L., Jianing, Z., and Kaili, R. (2023). Energy storage industry white paper 2023 (summary version). Reporte Técnico, China Energy Storage Alliance (CESA)
dc.relation.referencesIsmail, A., Saidi, L., Sayadi, M., and Benbouzid, M. (2020). Remaining useful life estimation for thermally aged power insulated gate bipolar transistors based on a modified maximum likelihood estimator. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 30
dc.relation.referencesJia, Z., Jin, K., Mei, W., Qin, P., Sun, J., and Wang, Q. (2025). Advances and perspectives in fire safety of lithium-ion battery energy storage systems. eTransportation, 24:100390
dc.relation.referencesJia, Z., Li, Z., Zhao, K., Wang, K., Wang, S., and Liu, Z. (2024). Cnn-dblstm: A long-term remaining life prediction framework for lithium-ion battery with small number of samples. Journal of Energy Storage, 97:112947
dc.relation.referencesKebede, A. A., Kalogiannis, T., Mierlo, J. V., and Berecibar, M. (2022). A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159
dc.relation.referencesKhaleghi, S., Hosen, M. S., Mierlo, J. V., and Berecibar, M. (2024). Towards machine-learning driven prognostics and health management of li-ion batteries. a comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 192
dc.relation.referencesKhan, N., Ooi, C. A., Alturki, A., Amir, M., Shreasth, and Alharbi, T. (2024). A critical review of battery cell balancing techniques, optimal design, converter topologies, and performance evaluation for optimizing storage system in electric vehicles. Energy Reports, 11:4999–5032
dc.relation.referencesKivanc, I., Fecarotti, C., Raassens, N., and van Houtum, G.-J. (2025). Condition-based maintenance for multi-component systems: A scalable optimization model with two thresholds. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 254:110634
dc.relation.referencesKou, H. (2023). 2h 2023 energy storage market outlook. Bloomberg NEF. Disponible en: https://about.bnef.com/blog/2h-2023-energy-storage-market-outlook/
dc.relation.referencesKrishna, G., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Almogren, A., Altameem, A., Rehman, A. U., and Hussen, S. (2024). Advanced battery management system enhancement using iot and ml for predicting remaining useful life in li-ion batteries. Scientific Reports, 14
dc.relation.referencesKucevic, D., Tepe, B., Englberger, S., Parlikar, A., Muhlbauer, M., Bohlen, O., Jossen, A., and Hesse, H. (2020). Standard battery energy storage system profiles: Analysis of various applications for stationary energy storage systems using a holistic simulation framework. Journal of Energy Storage, 28
dc.relation.referencesKucinskis, G., Bozorgchenani, M., Feinauer, M., Kasper, M., WohlfahrtMehrens, M., and Waldmann, T. (2022). Arrhenius plots for li-ion battery ageing as a function of temperature, c-rate, and ageing state – an experimental study. Journal of Power Sources, 549
dc.relation.referencesKumar, R. S., Singh, A. R., Narayana, P. L., Chandrika, V. S., Bajaj, M., and Zaitsev, I. (2025). Hybrid machine learning framework for predictive maintenance and anomaly detection in lithium-ion batteries using enhanced random forest. Scientific Reports, 15
dc.relation.referencesKuntz, P., Raccurt, O., Aza¨ıs, P., Richter, K., Waldmann, T., WohlfahrtMehrens, M., Bardet, M., Buzlukov, A., and Genies, S. (2021). Identification of degradation mechanisms by post-mortem analysis for high power and high energy commercial li-ion cells after electric vehicle aging. Batteries, 7
dc.relation.referencesLi, R., Hong, J., Zhang, H., and Chen, X. (2022). Data-driven battery state of health estimation based on interval capacity for real-world electric vehicles. Energy, 257:124771
dc.relation.referencesLin, C. P., Ling, M. H., Cabrera, J., Yang, F., Yu, D. Y. W., and Tsui, K. L. (2021). Prognostics for lithium-ion batteries using a two-phase gamma degradation process model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 214:107797
dc.relation.referencesLin, H., Kang, L., Xie, D., Linghu, J., and Li, J. (2022). Online state-of-health estimation of lithium-ion battery based on incremental capacity curve and bp neural network. Batteries, 8:29
dc.relation.referencesLiu, B., Chen, G., Lin, H. C., Zhang, W., and Liu, J. (2021a). Prediction of igbt junction temperature using improved cuckoo search-based extreme learning machine. Microelectronics Reliability, 124
dc.relation.referencesLiu, H., Li, C., Hu, X., Li, J., Zhang, K., Xie, Y., Wu, R., and Song, Z. (2025). Multi-modal framework for battery state of health evaluation using open-source electric vehicle data. Nature Communications, 16
dc.relation.referencesLiu, X., Zheng, Z., B¨uy¨uktahtakın, E., Zhou, Z., and Wang, P. (2021b). Battery asset management with cycle life prognosis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 216
dc.relation.referencesMa, Z., Jia, M., Koltermann, L., Bl¨omeke, A., Doncker, R. W. D., Li, W., and Sauer, D. U. (2023). Review on grid-tied modular battery energy storage systems: Configuration classifications, control advances, and performance evaluations. Journal of Energy Storage, 74
dc.relation.referencesMeitz, L., Senge, J., Wagenhals, T., Sch¨oler, T., H¨ahner, J., Edinger, J., and Krupitzer, C. (2025). A literature review framework and open research challenges for predictive maintenance in industry 4.0. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 206
dc.relation.referencesMiao, Y., Hynan, P., von Jouanne, A., and Yokochi, A. (2019). Current li-ion battery technologies in electric vehicles and opportunities for advancements. Energies, 12
dc.relation.referencesMinota, J. (2024). Nariño: Explosión durante una celebración religiosa dejó 15 personas heridas. EL TIEMPO. Disponible en: https://www.eltiempo.com/colombia/otra s-ciudades/susto-por-explosion-durante-una-celebracion-religiosa-en-zona-rural -de-barbacoas-3351180
dc.relation.referencesMontaño, J. (2023). Explosi´on de baterías solares en isla múcura deja a zona turística sin energía. EL TIEMPO. Disponible en: https://www.eltiempo.com/colombia/ot ras-ciudades/explosion-de-baterias-solares-en-isla-mucura-deja-a-isla-turisti ca-sin-energia-817604
dc.relation.referencesMorel, C. and Morel, J. Y. (2024). Power semiconductor junction temperature and lifetime estimations: A review. Energies, 17
dc.relation.referencesMviri, F. S. M. (2022). Battery storage systems in electric power grid: A review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2276
dc.relation.referencesMoller, M., Kucevic, D., Collath, N., Parlikar, A., Dotzauer, P., Tepe, B., Englberger, S., Jossen, A., and Hesse, H. (2022). Simses: A holistic simulation framework for modeling and analyzing stationary energy storage systems. Journal of Energy Storage, 49
dc.relation.referencesNasiri, F., Ooka, R., Haghighat, F., Shirzadi, N., Dotoli, M., Carli, R., Scarabaggio, P., Behzadi, A., Rahnama, S., Afshari, A., Kuznik, F., Fabrizio, E., Choudhary, R., and Sadrizadeh, S. (2022). Data analytics and information technologies for smart energy storage systems: A state-of-the-art review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 84
dc.relation.referencesNazaralizadeh, S., Banerjee, P., Srivastava, A. K., and Famouri, P. (2024). Battery energy storage systems: A review of energy management systems and health metrics. Energies, 17
dc.relation.referencesNienhuis, R. M., van Rooij, M., Prins, W. A., Jayawardhana, B., and Vakis, A. I. (2023). Investigating the efficiency of a novel offshore pumped hydro energy storage system: Experimental study on a scale prototype. Journal of Energy Storage, 74
dc.relation.referencesNyamathulla, S. and Dhanamjayulu, C. (2024). A review of battery energy storage systems and advanced battery management system for different applications: Challenges and recommendations. Journal of Energy Storage, 86
dc.relation.referencesOlabi, A. G., Allam, M. A., Abdelkareem, M. A., Deepa, T. D., Alami, A. H., Abbas, Q., Alkhalidi, A., and Sayed, E. T. (2023). Redox flow batteries: Recent development in main components, emerging technologies, diagnostic techniques, large-scale applications, and challenges and barriers. Batteries, 9
dc.relation.referencesOlabi, A. G., Wilberforce, T., Abdelkareem, M. A., and Ramadan, M. (2021). Critical review of flywheel energy storage system. Energies, 14
dc.relation.referencesOrtega, P. C., Gómez, P. D., Sánchez, J. C. M., Camarero, F. E., and Ángel Pardiñas (2023). Battery energy storage systems for the new electricity market landscape: Modeling, state diagnostics, management, and viability - a review. Energies, 16
dc.relation.referencesPakjoo, M., Piegari, L., Rancilio, G., Colnago, S., Mengou, J. E., Bresciani, F., Gorni, G., Mandelli, S., and Merlo, M. (2023). A review on testing of electrochemical cells for aging models in bess. Energies, 16
dc.relation.referencesPang, X., Yang, W., Wang, C., Fan, H., Wang, L., Li, J., Zhong, S., Zheng, W., Zou, H., Chen, S., and Liu, Q. (2023). A novel hybrid model for lithium-ion batteries lifespan prediction with high accuracy and interpretability. Journal of Energy Storage, 61:106728
dc.relation.referencesPeñaranda, A. F., Romero-Quete, D., and Cortés, C. A. (2021). Grid-scale battery energy storage for arbitrage purposes: A colombian case. Batteries, 7
dc.relation.referencesPradhan, S. K. and Chakraborty, B. (2022). Battery management strategies: An essential review for battery state of health monitoring techniques. Journal of Energy Storage, 51
dc.relation.referencesRahmani, P., Chakraborty, S., Mele, I., Katraˇsnik, T., Bernhard, S., Pruefling, S., Wilkins, S., and Hegazy, O. (2025). Driving the future: A comprehensive review of automotive battery management system technologies, and future trends. Journal of Power Sources, 629:235827
dc.relation.referencesRai, A. and Liu, J. (2025). A novel feature adaptive meta-model for efficient remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage, 114:115715
dc.relation.referencesRampinelli, G., Krenzinger, A., and Romero, F. C. (2014). Mathematical models for efficiency of inverters used in grid connected photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34:578–587
dc.relation.referencesRey, S. O., Romero, J. A., Romero, L. T., Alber Filb`a Mart´ınez, Roger, X. S., ` Qamar, M. A., Dom´ınguez-Garc´ıa, J. L., and Gevorkov, L. (2023). Powering the future: A comprehensive review of battery energy storage systems. Energies, 16
dc.relation.referencesRouholamini, M., Wang, C., Nehrir, H., Hu, X., Hu, Z., Aki, H., Zhao, B., Miao, Z., and Strunz, K. (2022). A review of modeling, management, and applications of grid-connected li-ion battery storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13:4505–4524
dc.relation.referencesSaldarini, A., Longo, M., Brenna, M., and Zaninelli, D. (2023). Battery electric storage systems: Advances, challenges, and market trends. Energies, 16
dc.relation.referencesSarbu, I. and Sebarchievici, C. (2018). A comprehensive review of thermal energy storage. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10
dc.relation.referencesSevilla, F. R. S., Liu, Y., Barocio, E., Korba, P., Andrade, M., Bellizio, F., Bos, J., Chaudhuri, B., Chavez, H., Cremer, J., Eriksson, R., Hamon, C., Herrera, M., Huijsman, M., Ingram, M., Klaar, D., Krishnan, V., Mola, J., Netto, M., Paolone, M., Papadopoulos, P., Ramirez, M., Rueda, J., Sattinger, W., Terzija, V., Tindemans, S., Trigueros, A., Wang, Y., and Zhao, J. (2022). State-of-the-art of data collection, analytics, and future needs of transmission utilities worldwide to account for the continuous growth of sensing data. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 137
dc.relation.referencesSharma, S. and Mortazavi, M. (2023). Pumped thermal energy storage: A review. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 213
dc.relation.referencesTang, J., Deng, Q., Wang, C., Liao, M., and Han, W. (2025). Integrated optimization of maintenance, spare parts management and operation for a multi-component system: A case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 202:110942
dc.relation.referencesTang, Y., Zhong, S., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., and Wang, Y. (2024). Remaining useful life prediction of high-capacity lithium-ion batteries based on incremental capacity analysis and gaussian kernel function optimization. Scientific Reports, 14
dc.relation.referencesThelen, A., Huan, X., Paulson, N., Onori, S., Hu, Z., and Hu, C. (2024). Probabilistic machine learning for battery health diagnostics and prognostics—review and perspectives. NPJ Materials Sustainability, 2
dc.relation.referencesTouloupas, G. and Zhang, C. (2023). Bess quality: Our lessons learned. Clean Energy Asociates (CEA). Disponible en: https://www.cea3.com/cea-blog/bess-quality-our-lessons-learned
dc.relation.referencesUPME (2021). Convocatoria pública upme str 01 de 2021. Preporte Técnico, Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética (UPME)
dc.relation.referencesVasconcelos, P. H., De Souza, A. C., and Ribeiro, P. F. (2019). Multibattery management considering cell degradation and economic constraints. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2019-Augus:1–5
dc.relation.referencesWang, X., Wei, W., Zhang, Y., Feng, W., Xu, G., and Xiang, A. (2022). A data-driven lifetime prediction method for thermal stress fatigue failure of power mosfets. Energy Reports, 8:467–473
dc.relation.referencesWang, X., Zhou, Z., He, S., Liu, J., and Cui, W. (2023). Performance degradation modeling and its prediction algorithm of an igbt gate oxide layer based on a cnn-lstm network. Micromachines, 14:959
dc.relation.referencesWerner, D., Paarmann, S., and Wetzel, T. (2021). Calendar aging of li-ion cells—experimental investigation and empirical correlation. Batteries, 7
dc.relation.referencesWitte, V. and Nuttall, H. (2024). Us energy storage monitor. Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables/American Clean Power Association. Disponible en: https: //www.woodmac.com/industry/power-and-renewables/us-energy-storage-
dc.relation.referencesXie, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, G., Takyi-Aninakwa, P., Fernandez, C., and Blaabjerg, F. (2024a). A review of data-driven whole-life state of health prediction for lithium-ion batteries: Data preprocessing, aging characteristics, algorithms, and future challenges. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 97:630–649
dc.relation.referencesXie, Z., Jin, Q., Su, G., and Lu, W. (2024b). A review of hydrogen storage and transportation: Progresses and challenges. Energies, 17
dc.relation.referencesXu, Q., Cao, Y., Chen, B., Zhou, J., and Xue, F. (2024). Revealing the strengthening mechanism of cu–sn composites joint fabricated via in-situ reaction for power electronic packaging. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 895:146252
dc.relation.referencesYe, X., Tan, F., Song, X., Dai, H., Li, X., Mu, S., and Hao, S. (2024). Modeling, simulation, and risk analysis of battery energy storage systems in new energy grid integration scenarios. Energy Engineering: Journal of the Association of Energy Engineering, 121:3689–3710
dc.relation.referencesZarei-Jelyani, M. and Esmaeilzadeh, F. (2024). A semiempirical and multi-variable model for prediction of capacity loss in lithium-ion batteries: Considering cycling and performance time degradations. Journal of Power Sources, 602:234377
dc.relation.referencesZeng, Y., Yi, Y., and Liu, P. (2020). An improved investigation into the effects of the temperature-dependent parasitic elements on the losses of sic mosfets. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10:1–22
dc.relation.referencesZhang, M. and Fan, X. (2020). Review on the state of charge estimation methods for electric vehicle battery. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 11
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Q., Liu, Y., Xiang, Y., and Xiahou, T. (2024). Reinforcement learning in reliability and maintenance optimization: A tutorial. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 251:110401
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y., Cai, B., Ahmed, S., Wang, C., Li, Q., and Gao, L. (2025). A resilience-driven emergency maintenance operation scheme optimization method based on risk. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 254:110630
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Z., Liang, L., and Fei, H. (2023). Investigation on safe-operating-area degradation and failure modes of sic mosfets under repetitive short-circuit conditions. Power Electronic Devices and Components, 4:100026
dc.relation.referencesZhou, X., Chu, X., Bu, Q., and Zou, Y. (2024). Degradation state estimation for insulated gate bipolar transistor based on multi-scale fusion learning. Control Engineering Practice, 145:105852
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.subject.blaaGestión de activos. Métodos
dc.subject.blaaMantenimiento Predictivo
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería
dc.subject.proposalGestión de activosspa
dc.subject.proposalÍndice de Saludspa
dc.subject.proposalMantenimiento Predictivospa
dc.subject.proposalAsset Managementeng
dc.subject.proposalHealth Indexeng
dc.subject.proposalPredictive Maintenanceeng
dc.subject.wikidataBatería de ion de litiospa
dc.subject.wikidataLithium-ion batteryeng
dc.titleDesarrollo de un modelo de mantenimiento con base en la relación costo-beneficio para baterías de ion de litio y electrónica de potencia en sistemas de almacenamiento de energíaspa
dc.title.translatedDevelopment of a cost-benefit-based maintenance model for lithium-ion batteries and power electronics in energy storage systemseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEspecializada
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentAdministradores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tesis Final de Maestría en Ingeniería - Automatización Industrial.2025.pdf
Tamaño:
28.25 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: