Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Selección de tratamientos químicos para recobro mejorado a partir de metodologías multicriterio

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorOlaya Morales, Yris
dc.contributor.advisorMejía Cárdenas, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Romero, Cindy Alejandra
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-14T16:36:59Z
dc.date.available2020-02-14T16:36:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75604
dc.description.abstractThis research presents a decision methodology to select a chemical treatment for enhanced oil recovery in a specific field. The proposed decision algorithm combines Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy Logic (FL), and Genetic Algorithms (GA) for determining the relative importance of criteria, and then with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to select the best alternative.
dc.description.abstractEn este trabajo de investigación se presenta una metodología de decisión para respaldar la elección de tratamientos químicos para mejorar la recuperación de petróleo en un campo específico. El algoritmo de decisión propuesto combina el proceso analítico jerárquico (AHP), la lógica difusa (FL) y algoritmos genéticos (GA), para determinar la importancia relativa de los criterios y luego, con la técnica para el orden de preferencia por similitud con la solución ideal (TOPSIS) seleccionar la mejor alternativa.
dc.format.extent142
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddcIngeniería de sistemas
dc.titleSelección de tratamientos químicos para recobro mejorado a partir de metodologías multicriterio
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.coverage.sucursalUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.description.additionalMaestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.contributor.researchgroupDinámicas de Flujo y Transporte en Medios Porosos
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relation.referencesB. Liang et al., “Novel Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Decision-Making Work Flow Derived From the Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS Method : A Case Study,” no. October 2015, pp. 20–22, 2018.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Carlos and S. Tamayo, “Metodología para la identificación de pozos con oportunidades de incremento de producción en campos maduros universidad central del Ecuador,” Universidad Central del Ecuador, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesR. Al-Mjeni, S. Arora, and P. Cherukupalli, “Has the time come for EOR?,” Oilf. Rev., vol. 22, no. 4.
dc.relation.referencesA. A. Olajire, “Review of ASP EOR (alkaline surfactant polymer enhanced oil recovery) technology in the petroleum industry: Prospects and challenges,” Energy, vol. 77, pp. 963–982, Dec. 2014.
dc.relation.referencesA. Y. Zekri and K. K. Jerbi, “Economic evaluation of enhanced oil recovery,” Oil Gas Sci. Technol., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 259–267, 2002.
dc.relation.referencesC. M. Aparicio González, “Desarrollo de un algoritmo de decisión multicriterio para la gestión de listas de espera en la solicitud de holter,” 2015.
dc.relation.referencesEcuRed, “Análisis multicriterio - EcuRed.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ecured.cu/Análisis_multicriterio. [Accessed: 07-Nov-2018].
dc.relation.referencesA. Guitouni and J.-M. Martel, “Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 501–521, Sep. 1998.
dc.relation.referencesM. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods,” Int. J. Oper. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 49–58, 2015.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Ruiz, “MÉTODOS DE DECISIÓN MULTICRITERIO ELECTRE Y TOPSIS APLICADOS A LA ELECCIÓN DE UN DISPOSITIVO MÓVIL,” Universidad de Sevilla, 2015.
dc.relation.referencesF. J. Ruvalcaba Coyaso, F. J. and A. Vermonden, A., “Lógica difusa para la toma de decisiones y la selección de personal,” Univ. Empres., vol. 17, no. 29, pp. 239–256, 2016.
dc.relation.referencesM. B. Ayhan, “A Fuzzy AHP Approach For Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study In A Gearmotor Company,” Int. J. Manag. Value Supply Chain., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 11–23, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesI. A. León Téllez, S. L. Garcia Guevara, and Y. Guerra Vázquez, “A Model for Hierarchical Arrangement and Selection of Projects for Local Development Initiatives in Municipalities,” Retos la Dir., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 159–185, 2018.
dc.relation.referencesJ. J. Buckley and V. R. R. Uppuluri, “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis,” in Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making, Boston, MA: Springer US, 1987, pp. 389–401
dc.relation.referencesM. Khojastehmehr, M. Madani, and A. Daryasafar, “Screening of enhanced oil recovery techniques for Iranian oil reservoirs using TOPSIS algorithm,” Energy Reports, vol. 5, pp. 529–544, Nov. 2019
dc.relation.referencesENERGY INSTITUTE LONDON, Good plant design and operation for onshore carbon capture installations and onshore pipelines. 2010.
dc.relation.referencesNALCO, “Environmental impact assessment for capacity augmentation of specialty chemicals from 11,000 tpa to 22,000 tpa within the existing plant at konnagar, hooghly district, west bengal,” 2018
dc.relation.referencesF. B. Cortés et al., “Development and Evaluation of Surfactant Nanocapsules for Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Applications.,” Molecules, vol. 23, no. 7, Jun. 2018.
dc.relation.referencesK. Semeco, “REPARACIÓN DE POZOS - QRA Análisis Probabilístico de Riesgo de la Actividad de Perforación y Reparación de Pozos,” Reliab. Risk Manag. S.A, 2006.
dc.relation.referencesC. A. Espinosa and K. J. Torres, “Técnicas de recobro y recobro mejorado en yacimientos con crudos livianos , pesados y extra-pesados,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., p. 19, 2015
dc.relation.referencesA. Al-Adasani and B. Bai, “Recent Developments and Updated Screening Criteria of Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques,” pp. 1–24, 2010
dc.relation.referencesSchlumberger Oilfield Glossary, “tensión interfacial - Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary.” [Online]. Available: ttps://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/es/Terms/i/interfacial_tension.aspx. [Accessed: 08-Jun-2019].
dc.relation.referencesSchlumberger Limited, “EOR Pilot Design | Schlumberger,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.slb.com/services/technical_challenges/enhanced_oil_recovery/pilot_projects/construction_eor.aspx. [Accessed: 03-Sep-2018].
dc.relation.referencesSchlumberger Limited, “Pilot Projects | Schlumberger,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.slb.com/services/technical_challenges/enhanced_oil_recovery/pilot_projects.aspx. [Accessed: 03-Sep-2018
dc.relation.referencesA. Morillas, “Introducción al análisis de datos difusos,” in Introducción al análisis de datos difusos, Edición el., 2006.
dc.relation.referencesS. C. D. F. José, “A Genetic Algorithm to Obtain Consistency in Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Brazilian J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 2011.
dc.relation.referencesF. Moussaoui, M. Cherrared, M. A. Kacimi, and R. Belarbi, “A genetic algorithm to optimize consistency ratio in AHP method for energy performance assessment of residential buildings—Application of top-down and bottom-up approaches in Algerian case study,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 42, no. August 2017, pp. 622–636, 2018.
dc.relation.referencesA. S. Milani, A. Shanian, R. Madoliat, and J. A. Nemes, “The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 312–318, Apr. 2005.
dc.relation.referencesA. Çelen, “Comparative Analysis of Normalization Procedures in TOPSIS Method: With an Application to Turkish Deposit Banking Market,” INFORMATICA, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 185–208, 2014
dc.relation.referencesL. M. Camarinha-Matos, A. J. Falcão, N. Vafaei, and S. Najdi, “Normalization Techniques for Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Analytical Hierarchy Process Case Study,” IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol., vol. 470, no. October 2017, 2016.
dc.relation.referencesS. Chakraborty and C.-H. Yeh, “A simulation comparison of normalization procedures for TOPSIS,” no. July, pp. 1815–1820, 2009.
dc.relation.referencesN. Vafaei, R. A. Ribeiro, and L. M. C. Matos, “Data normalisation techniques in decision making: case study with TOPSIS method,” Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 19, 2018.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalTOPSIS
dc.subject.proposalGenetic algorithm
dc.subject.proposalEnhanced oil recovery
dc.subject.proposalAlgoritmo genético
dc.subject.proposalChemical treatment
dc.subject.proposalRecobro mejorado
dc.subject.proposalTratamiento químico
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
1067908050.2019.pdf
Tamaño:
3.618Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería ...
Descargar
Thumbnail
Nombre:
license_rdf
Tamaño:
805bytes
Formato:
application/rdf+xml
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito