Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorBogliacino, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Rodriguez, Erika Celene
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T13:06:43Z
dc.date.available2020-03-16T13:06:43Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-28
dc.identifier.citationSánchez E-C. (2019). Efecto de los obstáculos financieros sobre la innovación y la productividad en las empresas manufactureras en Colombia (Tesis de maestria). Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá D.C.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/76087
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this thesis is to contribute to the study of the effects of financial obstacles on the capacity for innovation and productivity of firms in Colombia. For this purpose, a firm-level data panel is used that covers the period 2007-2014, constructed from the data of the productive performance surveys for the manufacturing sectors - EAM and the Technological Development and Innovation Surveys applied to the industry - EDIT. The effect of financial barriers to innovation is approached through the estimation of an intangible capital production function, using the Heckman selection procedure for probit models together with instrumental variables to correct data endogeneity problems. On the other hand, the analysis of the impact on multifactor productivity, calculated using the semi-parametric method suggested by Levinsohn and Petrin, is carried out in a heterogeneous manner by applying the non-parametric quantile regression method. The results show that, there is a relationship between the problems of financing innovative activity and the ability of firms in Colombia to obtain innovations and improve their productivity. The first part of the analysis shows that financial limitations on access to private resources are associated with a lower probability of obtaining process innovations, while radical product innovation is strongly influenced by financial barriers related to access to public resources. In the second part it is obtained that, the obstacles related to the availability of internal resources (own) negatively affect the productivity of the firm only in the highest quantiles; having a more pronounced effect on companies located in the upper quartile of multifactor productivity, meanwhile, the barriers associated with private financing maintain a negative behavior throughout the distribution of productivity of the firm; affecting quantiles 50 and 90 to a greater extent. The findings suggest that the most productive firms tend to perceive, to a greater extent the barriers related to the availability of own resources and access to private financing.
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de esta tesis es contribuir al estudio de los efectos de los obstáculos financieros sobre la capacidad de innovación y la productividad de las empresas en Colombia. Para tal fin se usa un panel de datos a nivel de firma que abarca el periodo 2007-2014, construido a partir de los datos de las encuestas de desempeño productivo para los sectores de manufactura – EAM y las Encuestas de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica aplicadas a la industria – EDIT. El efecto de las barreras financieras sobre la innovación se aborda a través de la estimación de una función de producción de capital intangible, utilizando el procedimiento de selección Heckman para modelos probit junto con variables instrumentales para corregir problemas de endogeneidad de los datos. Por otro lado, el análisis del impacto sobre la productividad multifactorial, calculada mediante el método semiparamétrico sugerido por Levinsohn y Petrin, se realiza de manera heterogénea aplicando el método no paramétrico de regresión cuantílica. Los resultados evidencian que, existe una relación entre los problemas de financiación de la actividad innovadora y la capacidad de las empresas en Colombia para obtener innovaciones y mejorar su productividad. La primera parte del análisis arroja que las limitaciones de financiación al acceso a recursos privados se asocian a una menor probabilidad de obtener innovaciones de proceso, mientras que, la innovación de producto de tipo radical se ve fuertemente influenciada por los obstáculos financieros relacionados con el acceso a recursos públicos. En la segunda parte se obtiene que, los obstáculos relacionados con la disponibilidad de recursos internos (propios) afectan negativamente la productividad de la firma únicamente en los cuantiles más altos; teniendo un efecto más pronunciado en las empresas ubicadas en el cuartil superior de la productividad multifactorial, entretanto, las barreras asociadas a la financiación privada mantienen un comportamiento negativo a lo largo de la distribución de productividad de la firma; afectando en mayor medida a los cuantiles 50 y 90. Los hallazgos sugieren que las empresas más productivas, tienden a percibir en mayor medida como altamente relevantes las barreras relacionadas con la disponibilidad de recursos propios y de acceso a financiamiento privado.
dc.format.extent44
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía
dc.titleEfecto de los obstáculos financieros sobre la innovación y la productividad en las empresas manufactureras en Colombia
dc.title.alternativeEffect of financial obstacles on innovation and productivity in manufacturing firms in Colombia
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.description.additionalMagíster en Ciencias Económicas. Línea de Investigación: Desarrollo Económico
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo Interdisciplinario en Teoría e Investigación Aplicada en Ciencias Económicas
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Economía
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAlbis, N., & Álvarez, I. (2017). A comparative analysis of the innovation performance between foreign subsidiaries and owned domestic firms in Colombian manufacturing sector. Journal Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability, 11(2), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.3232/GCG.2017.V11.N2.01
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, R., & Bertin, M. J. (2016). Banking competition and firm-level financial constraints in Latin America. Emerging Markets Review, 28, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2016.08.019
dc.relation.referencesBah, R., & Dumontier, P. (2001). R&D intensity and corporate financial policy: Some international evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(5–6), 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00389
dc.relation.referencesBarona-Zuluaga, B., Rivera-Godoy, J. A., Aguilera-Cifuentes, C. I., & Garizado-Román, P. A. (2015). Financiación de la innovación en Colombia. Funding for Innovation in Colombia., 11(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2015v11n1.21126
dc.relation.referencesBaumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X
dc.relation.referencesBhattacharya, S., & Ritter, J. R. (1983). Innovation and Communication: Signalling with Partial Disclosure. The Review of Economic Studies, 50(2), 331. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297419
dc.relation.referencesBlanchard, P., Huiban, J. P., Musolesi, A., & Sevestre, P. (2013). Where there is a will, there is a way? Assessing the impact of obstacles to innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts027
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., & Gómez, S. (2014). Capabilities and investment in R&D: An analysis on European data. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 31, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2014.09.001
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., Perani, G., Pianta, M., & Supino, S. (2012). Innovation and Development: The Evidence From Innovation Surveys. Latin American Business Review, Vol. 13, pp. 219–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2012.730023
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2012). Profits , R & D , and innovation — a model and a test. 22(3), 649–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts028
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2016). The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services. Economia Politica, 33(2), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-016-0035-1
dc.relation.referencesBusom, I., & Vélez-Ospina, J. A. (2017). Innovation, Public Support, and Productivity in Colombia. A Cross-industry Comparison. World Development, 99, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.005
dc.relation.referencesCanepa, A., & Stoneman, P. (2008). Financial constraints to innovation in the UK: Evidence from CIS2 and CIS3. Oxford Economic Papers, 60(4), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpm044
dc.relation.referencesCarpenter, R. E., & Petersen, B. C. (2002). Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. Economic Journal, 112(477). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00683
dc.relation.referencesCarreira, C., & Silva, F. (2010). No deep pockets: Some stylized empirical results on firms’ financial constraints. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(4), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00619.x
dc.relation.referencesCefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2006). Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival. Research Policy, 35(5), 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006
dc.relation.referencesCoad, A., Pellegrino, G., & Savona, M. (2016). Barriers to innovation and firm productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1076193
dc.relation.referencesCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
dc.relation.referencesCriscuolo, C., Haskel, J. E., & Slaughter, M. J. (2010). Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.07.012
dc.relation.referencesCrisóstomo, V. L., López-Iturriaga, F. J., & Vallelado, E. (2011). Financial Constraints for Innovation in Brazil. Latin American Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2011.592797
dc.relation.referencesCzarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K. (2004). Innovation indicators and corporate credit ratings: Evidence from German firms. Economics Letters, 82(3), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.09.016
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2014). Boletín técnico Encuesta Anual Manufacturera - EAM 2014 (pp. 1–32). pp. 1–32. Retrieved from https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/industria/encuesta-anual-manufacturera-enam/eam-historicos
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2016). Metodología General Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica en los Sectores Servicios y Comercio – EDITS. Retrieved from https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-innovacion/encuesta-de-desarrollo-e-innovacion-tecnologica-edit
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2017). Metodología General Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica en la Industria Manufacturera – EDIT. Retrieved from https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-innovacion/encuesta-de-desarrollo-e-innovacion-tecnologica-edit
dc.relation.referencesDANE, DNP, & COLCIENCIAS. (2005). Innovacion y desarrollo tecnologico en la industria manufacturera colombia 2003-2004.
dc.relation.referencesDosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. In Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 221–238). Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/research/nature-innovative-process/
dc.relation.referencesEdquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)90244-8
dc.relation.referencesGorodnichenko, Y., & Schnitzer, M. (2013). FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS AND INNOVATION: WHY POOR COUNTRIES DON’T CATCH UP. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(5), 1115–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12033
dc.relation.referencesGriffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj028
dc.relation.referencesGriffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653043125194
dc.relation.referencesGriliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution and development of research to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321
dc.relation.referencesGriliches, Z. (1984). R & D, Patents, and Productivity. In University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(84)90114-9
dc.relation.referencesHall, B. H. (2002). The Financing of Research and Development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.35
dc.relation.referencesHall, B. H. (2010). The Financing of Innovative Firms. Review of Economics and Institutions, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5202/rei.v1i1.4
dc.relation.referencesHall, B. H., Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. A. (1986). Patents and R&D: Is There A Lag? International Economic Review, 27(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526504
dc.relation.referencesHall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1(1 C), 609–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
dc.relation.referencesHimmelberg, C. P., & Petersen, B. C. (1994). R & D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109824
dc.relation.referencesLach, S., & Schankerman, M. (1989). Dynamics of R & D and Investment in the Scientific Sector. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 880–904. https://doi.org/10.1086/261632
dc.relation.referencesLevinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating Production Funct Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. Oxford University Press, 70(2), 317–341. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3648636
dc.relation.referencesLundvall, B.-Å., Joseph, K., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries : building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, p. 416. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172181101600308
dc.relation.referencesMadrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D., & Van Auken, H. (2009). Barriers to innovation among spanish manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x
dc.relation.referencesMairesse, J., & Robin, S. (2009). Innovation and productivity: a firm-level analysis for French Manufacturing and Services using CIS3 and CIS4 data (1998-2000 and 2002-2004). Innovation, (December), 1–18.
dc.relation.referencesMohnen, P., Palm, F. C., Van der Loeff, S. S., & Tiwari, A. (2008). Financial constraints and other obstacles: Are they a threat to innovation activity? Economist, 156(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-008-9089-y
dc.relation.referencesMyers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
dc.relation.referencesOECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd Editio). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
dc.relation.referencesOECD (2002). Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. In The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities (Vol. 6th). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264199040-en
dc.relation.referencesPiva, M., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). Is demand-pulled innovation equally important in different groups of firms? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(5), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem010
dc.relation.referencesPowell, D. (2016). Quantile Regression with Nonadditive Fixed Effects. RAND Working Paper.
dc.relation.referencesRICYT. (2001). Manual d Bogotá, Normalización de indicadores de innovación tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe. In Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología - RICYT.
dc.relation.referencesSavignac, F. (2008). Impact of financial constraints on innovation: What can be learned from a direct measure? Economics of Innovation and New Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590701538432
dc.relation.referencesSilva, F., & Carreira, C. (2012). Do financial constraints threat the innovation process? Evidence from Portuguese firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(8), 701–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2011.639979
dc.relation.referencesSolow, R. M. . (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
dc.relation.referencesSong, M., Ai, H., & Li, X. (2015). Political connections, financing constraints, and the optimization of innovation efficiency among China’s private enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.003
dc.relation.referencesStewart, M. (2006). Maximum simulated likelihood estimation of random-effects dynamic probit models with autocorrelated errors. Stata Journal, 6(2), 256–272.
dc.relation.referencesStiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). American Economic Association Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. Source: The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.2307/1802787
dc.relation.referencesVan de Ven, W. P. M. M., & Van Praag, B. M. S. (1981). The demand for deductibles in private health insurance. Journal of Econometrics, 17(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90028-2
dc.relation.referencesVillarreal, N. F., Lucio-Arias, D., Albis, N., & Mora, H. (2014). Determinantes de la innovación y la productividad en la industria manufacturera colombiana por tamaño de firma. In Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología.
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, O. E. (1988). Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance, 43(3), 567–591. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328184
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalColombia
dc.subject.proposalColombia
dc.subject.proposalObstáculos financieros
dc.subject.proposalFinancial obstacles
dc.subject.proposalInnovación
dc.subject.proposalInnovation
dc.subject.proposalProductividad multifactorial
dc.subject.proposalMultifactor productivity
dc.subject.proposalManufacturing industries
dc.subject.proposalIndustrias manufactureras
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito