Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorLara Diaz, María Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorMateus Moreno, Angélica
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-22T14:24:18Z
dc.date.available2020-07-22T14:24:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-29
dc.identifier.citationMateus-Moreno, A. (2020). Relación entre el aprendizaje estadístico y la lectoescritura en niños con dislexia en una ortografía transparente (tesis de maestría). Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77818
dc.description.abstractLa naturaleza de las dificultades de lectura, específicamente de la dislexia aún no es clara, por ello desde diferentes perspectivas incluida la neurociencia cognitiva, se ha buscado identificar los factores emergentes que se relacionan con la presencia de dicha dificultad, con el fin de mejorar los procesos de identificación y orientar futuras intervenciones terapéuticas. Recientemente se ha descrito el rendimiento en tareas de aprendizaje estadístico (AE) (Spencer, Kaschak, Jones, y Lonigan, 2015) como factor que se relaciona con las habilidades lectoras en ortografías opacas como el inglés, mostrando que niños que presentan dificultades de lectura como la dislexia, presentan un rendimiento menor en AE. Sin embargo, estas relaciones no son muy claras aún en ortografías transparentes como el español, donde existe mayor concordancia en la relación grafema - fonema, por lo que puede existir una menor necesidad de hacer uso de estrategias implícitas para favorecer el proceso de alfabetización. La presente investigación buscó identificar la influencia del aprendizaje estadístico en una ortografía transparente como el español en niños de 9 a 12 años con y sin dislexia y las relaciones que pueden existir con el desempeño en lectura y escritura. Se evidencia un rendimiento menor para tareas de AE en niños con dislexia en comparación con sus controles, siendo la precisión para tareas de AE una variable predictora en procesos de lectura y escritura en español. Esta investigación avanza en el proceso de clarificación sobre la naturaleza de la dificultad y la comprensión de la influencia del AE en el aprendizaje de la lectura y la escritura; de igual forma, favorece la identificación de las dificultades lectoras, su manejo terapéutico y la innovación en prácticas pedagógicas desde la visión del AE.
dc.description.abstractThe nature of reading difficulties, specifically of dyslexia is not yet clear, therefore from different perspectives, including cognitive neuroscience has sought to identify emerging factors that are related to the presence of such difficulty, in order to improve processes of identification and guide future therapeutic interventions. Recently, performance in statistical learning tasks (AE) (Spencer, Kaschak, Jones, & Lonigan, 2015) has been described as a factor that relates to reading skills in opaque orthography such as English, showing that children who have reading difficulties like dyslexia, they have a lower performance in AE. However, these relationships are not very clear even in transparent spellings such as Spanish, where there is greater concordance between grapheme and phoneme, so there may be less need to make use of implicit strategies to favor the literacy process. This research seeks to identify the influence of statistical learning in a transparent spelling such as Spanish in children aged 9 to 12 years with and without dyslexia and the relationships that may exist with reading and writing performance. There is a lower performance for AE tasks in children with dyslexia, the accuracy for AE tasks being a predictive variable in reading and writing processes in Spanish. This investigation advances in the process of clarification on the nature of the difficulty and the understanding of the influence of AE in the learning of reading and writing. Likewise, it favors the identification of reading difficulties and their therapeutic management and innovation in pedagogical practices from the AE's perspective.
dc.format.extent111
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psicología::158 - Psicología aplicada
dc.subject.ddc370 - Educación
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud
dc.titleRelación entre el aprendizaje estadístico y la lectoescritura en niños con dislexia en una ortografía transparente
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Maestría en Neurociencias
dc.contributor.researchgroupGRUPO DE NEUROCIENCIAS-UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAdlof, S., y Hogan, T. (2018). Understanding Dyslexia in the Context of Developmental Language Disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 762-773. doi:doi:10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0049
dc.relation.referencesArciuli, J. (2018). Reading as Statistical Learning. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3s), 634-643. doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-stlt1-17-0135
dc.relation.referencesArciuli, J., y Conway, C. (2018). The Promise and Challenge of Statistical Learning for Elucidating Atypical Language Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 492-500. doi:10.1177/0963721418779977
dc.relation.referencesArciuli, J., y Simpson, I. (2011). Statistical learning in typically developing children: the role of age and speed of stimulus presentation. Developmental science, 14(3), 464-473. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00937.x
dc.relation.referencesArciuli, J., y Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical Learning Is Related to Reading Ability in Children and Adults. Cognitive science, 36(2), 286-304. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01200.x
dc.relation.referencesAshby, F. G., y Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human Category Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 149-178. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217
dc.relation.referencesBeck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., y Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction: Guilford Press.
dc.relation.referencesBergmann, J., y Wimmer, H. (2008). A dual-route perspective on poor reading in a regular orthography: Evidence from phonological and orthographic lexical decisions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(5), 653-676. doi:10.1080/02643290802221404
dc.relation.referencesBishop, D. V., y Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different? Psychol Bulletin, 130(6), 858-886. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858
dc.relation.referencesCabbage, K. L., Farquharson, K., Iuzzini-Seigel, J., Zuk, J., y Hogan, T. (2018). Exploring the overlap between dyslexia and speech sound production deficits. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 774-786. doi:10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0008
dc.relation.referencesChen, C.-H., y Yu, C. (2017). Grounding statistical learning in context: The effects of learning and retrieval contexts on cross-situational word learning. Psychonomic bulletin y review, 24(3), 920-926. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1163-x
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L., y Dehaene, S. (2004). Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 22(1), 466-476. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049
dc.relation.referencesColeman, C., Gregg, N., McLain, L., y Bellair, L. W. (2009). A Comparison of Spelling Performance Across Young Adults With and Without Dyslexia. Assessment for effective intervention, 34(2), 94-105. doi:10.1177/1534508408318808
dc.relation.referencesColenbrander, D., Ricketts, J., y Breadmore, H. L. (2018). Early identification of dyslexia: Understanding the issues. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 817-828.
dc.relation.referencesColtheart, M. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. The science of reading: A handbook, 6-23.
dc.relation.referencesConnelly, V., Campbell, S., MacLean, M., y Barnes, J. (2006). Contribution of Lower Order Skills to the Written Composition of College Students With and Without Dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 175-196. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_9
dc.relation.referencesConway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., y Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114(3), 356-371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009
dc.relation.referencesConway, C. M., y Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 24-39. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.24
dc.relation.referencesCuetos, F., Ramos, J., y Ruano, E. (2002). PROESC. Evaluación de los procesos de escritura. Madrid: TEA.
dc.relation.referencesCuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., y Arribas, D. (2007). Prolec-R: Evaluación de los procesos lectores–revisado. Madrid: TEA.
dc.relation.referencesCuetos, F., y Vega, F. C. (2010). Psicología de la lectura: WK Educación.
dc.relation.referencesD'Mello, A. M., y Gabrieli, J. D. (2018). Cognitive Neuroscience of Dyslexia. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 798-809. doi:doi:10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0020
dc.relation.referencesDaltrozzo, J., y Conway, C. M. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 437. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00437
dc.relation.referencesDickinson, D. K., y Neuman, S. B. (2007). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2): Guilford Press.
dc.relation.referencesDuff, F. J., Reen, G., Plunkett, K., y Nation, K. (2015). Do infant vocabulary skills predict school-age language and literacy outcomes? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(8), 848-856. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12378
dc.relation.referencesElleman, A. M., Steacy, L. M., y Compton, D. L. (2019). The Role of Statistical Learning in Word Reading and Spelling Development: More Questions Than Answers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 1-7. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1549045
dc.relation.referencesEmberson, L. L., y Rubinstein, D. Y. (2016). Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least). Cognition, 153, 63-78. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.010
dc.relation.referencesErickson, L. C., y Thiessen, E. D. (2015). Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review, 37, 66-108. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.05.002
dc.relation.referencesEvans, J. L., Saffran, J. R., y Robe-Torres, K. (2009). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 321-335. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0189)
dc.relation.referencesFarquharson, K., Centanni, T. M., Franzluebbers, C. E., y Hogan, T. P. (2014). Phonological and lexical influences on phonological awareness in children with specific language impairment and dyslexia. Frontiers in psychology, 5(838). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00838
dc.relation.referencesFiser, J., y Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 458-467. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.458
dc.relation.referencesFrost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N., y Christiansen, M. H. (2015). Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(3), 117-125. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010
dc.relation.referencesFrost, R., Katz, L., y Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104-115. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104
dc.relation.referencesGabrieli, J. D. (2009). Dyslexia: a new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325(5938), 280-283. doi:10.1126/science.1171999
dc.relation.referencesGebhart, A. L., Newport, E. L., y Aslin, R. N. (2009). Statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies among nonlinguistic sounds. Psychonomic bulletin y review, 16(3), 486-490. doi:10.3758/pbr.16.3.486
dc.relation.referencesGrunow, H., Spaulding, T. J., Gómez, R. L., y Plante, E. (2006). The effects of variation on learning word order rules by adults with and without language-based learning disabilities. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39(2), 158-170. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.11.004
dc.relation.referencesHarm, M. W., y Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading: Cooperative Division of Labor Between Visual and Phonological Processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662-720. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662
dc.relation.referencesHayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and Remodeling Writing. Written communication, 29(3), 369-388. doi:10.1177/0741088312451260
dc.relation.referencesHayes, J. R., y Flower, L. (1981). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis: ERIC Clearinghouse.
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, V. M. (2009). Bottom-up processing and reading comprehension in experienced adult readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(3), 309-326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01396.x
dc.relation.referencesHolopainen, L., Ahonen, T., y Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting Delay in Reading Achievement in a Highly Transparent Language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 401-413. doi:10.1177/002221940103400502
dc.relation.referencesHorowitz-Kraus, T., y Hutton, J. S. (2015). From emergent literacy to reading: how learning to read changes a child's brain. Acta Paediatrica, 104(7), 648-656. doi:10.1111/apa.13018
dc.relation.referencesHoward, D. V., y Howard, J. H., Jr. (1992). Adult age differences in the rate of learning serial patterns: evidence from direct and indirect tests. Psychology and Aging, 7(2), 232-241. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.7.2.232
dc.relation.referencesHulme, C., y Snowling, M. J. (2016). Reading disorders and dyslexia. Current opinion in pediatrics, 28(6), 731-735. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000411
dc.relation.referencesJiménez-Fernández, G., Vaquero, J. M., Jiménez, L., y Defior, S. (2011). Dyslexic children show deficits in implicit sequence learning, but not in explicit sequence learning or contextual cueing. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(1), 85-110. doi:10.1007/s11881-010-0048-3
dc.relation.referencesKaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., y Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321-340. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011
dc.relation.referencesKirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., y Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83(2), B35-B42. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00004-5
dc.relation.referencesKovelman, I., Yip, J., y Beck, E. (2011). Cortical systems that process language, as revealed by non-native speech sound perception. NeuroReport, 22(18), 947-950. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834cdc26
dc.relation.referencesKüçükoğlu, H. (2013). Improving reading skills through effective reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 709-714. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.113
dc.relation.referencesLanger, N., Benjamin, C., Minas, J., y Gaab, N. (2013). The neural correlates of reading fluency deficits in children. Cerebral Cortex, 25(6), 1441-1453. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht330
dc.relation.referencesLara, M., Aguilar, E., y Serra, M. (2007). Prueba de procesamiento fonológico (PROFON). Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesLyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., y Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 1-14. doi:10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9
dc.relation.referencesMalatesha Joshi, R. (2005). Vocabulary: A Critical Component of Comprehension. Reading y Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 209-219. doi:10.1080/10573560590949278
dc.relation.referencesMcClelland, J. L., Botvinick, M. M., Noelle, D. C., Plaut, D. C., Rogers, T. T., Seidenberg, M. S., y Smith, L. B. (2010). Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 348-356. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002
dc.relation.referencesMorken, F., y Helland, T. (2013). Writing in Dyslexia: Product and Process. Dyslexia, 19(3), 131-148. doi:10.1002/dys.1455
dc.relation.referencesMortensen, J. A. (2009). Children's Perceptions of the Graphic Features They Use to Differentiate Writing from Drawing. University of Nevada, Reno.
dc.relation.referencesMorton, J., y Frith, U. (2001). Why we need cognition: Cause and developmental disorder. Language, brain, cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler 263.
dc.relation.referencesNigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I. C., y Defior, S. J. A. o. D. (2016). Implicit learning of non-linguistic and linguistic regularities in children with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(2), 202-218. doi:10.1007/s11881-015-0116-9.
dc.relation.referencesNigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I.C. et al. Implicit Learning of Written Regularities and Its Relation to Literacy Acquisition in a Shallow Orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(5), 571-585. doi:10.1007/s10936-014-9303-9
dc.relation.referencesNissen, M. J., y Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1-32. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
dc.relation.referencesNorton, E. S., Beach, S. D., y Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2015). Neurobiology of dyslexia. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 30, 73-78. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.007
dc.relation.referencesPacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., y Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 401-426. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401
dc.relation.referencesPaulesu E, Démonet JF, Fazio F, McCrory E, Chanoine V, Brunswick N, Cappa SF, Cossu G, Habib M, Frith CD, Frith U. C. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291(5511), 2165-2167. doi: 10.1126/science.1057179
dc.relation.referencesPerfetti, C. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. The neurocognition of language, 167, 208.
dc.relation.referencesPerfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesPerfetti, C. A., Landi, N., y Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. The science of reading: A handbook, 227-247.
dc.relation.referencesPerruchet, P., y Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 233-238. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006
dc.relation.referencesPoldrack, R. A., y Rodriguez, P. (2004). How do memory systems interact? Evidence from human classification learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 324-332. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2004.05.003
dc.relation.referencesPugh, K. (2006). A neurocognitive overview of reading acquisition and dyslexia across languages. Journal of Developmental science, 9(5), 448-450. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00528.x
dc.relation.referencesQi, Z., Sanchez Araujo, Y., Georgan, W. C., Gabrieli, J. D. E., y Arciuli, J. (2019). Hearing Matters More Than Seeing: A Cross-Modality Study of Statistical Learning and Reading Ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 101-115. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1485680
dc.relation.referencesReber, A. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 6(6), 855-863.
dc.relation.referencesReichle, E. D., Tokowicz, N., Liu, Y., y Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check. Psychophysiology, 48(7), 993-1003. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01169.x
dc.relation.referencesRello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., y Llisterri, J. (2017). A resource of errors written in Spanish by people with dyslexia and its linguistic, phonetic and visual analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation, 51(2), 379-408. doi: 10.1007/s10579-015-9329-0
dc.relation.referencesRichlan, F., Kronbichler, M., y Wimmer, H. (2011). Meta-analyzing brain dysfunctions in dyslexic children and adults. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1735-1742. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.040
dc.relation.referencesRomberg, A. R., y Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906-914. doi:10.1002/wcs.78
dc.relation.referencesRutter M1, Caspi A, Fergusson D, Horwood LJ, Goodman R, Maughan B, Moffitt TE, Meltzer H, Carroll J. (2004). Sex Differences in Developmental Reading DisabilityNew Findings From 4 Epidemiological Studies. JAMA, 291(16), 2007-2012. doi:10.1001/jama.291.16.2007 %J JAMA
dc.relation.referencesSaffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., y Newport, E. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928.
dc.relation.referencesSawi, O. M., y Rueckl, J. (2019). Reading and the Neurocognitive Bases of Statistical Learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 8-23. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1457681
dc.relation.referencesSchapiro, A. C., Gregory, E., Landau, B., McCloskey, M., y Turk-Browne, N. B. (2014). The Necessity of the Medial Temporal Lobe for Statistical Learning. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 26(8), 1736-1747. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00578
dc.relation.referencesSchmalz, X., Altoè, G., y Mulatti, C. J. A. o. D. (2017). Statistical learning and dyslexia: a systematic review. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(2), 147-162. doi:10.1007/s11881-016-0136-0
dc.relation.referencesSchmalz, X., Moll, K., Mulatti, C., y Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). Is Statistical Learning Ability Related to Reading Ability, and If So, Why? Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 64-76. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1482304
dc.relation.referencesSerrano, F., y Defior, S. (2008). Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1), 81. doi:10.1007/s11881-008-0013-6
dc.relation.referencesSeymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., y network, c. w. C. A. A. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of psychology, 94(2), 143-174. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859
dc.relation.referencesShare, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an" outlier" orthography. Psychological bulletin, 134(4), 584. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584.
dc.relation.referencesSiegelman, N., y Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105-120. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.001
dc.relation.referencesSnow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an RyD program in reading comprehension: Rand Corporation.
dc.relation.referencesSnowling, M. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7(1), 37-46. doi:10.1002/dys.185
dc.relation.referencesSnowling, M. (2014). Dyslexia: A language learning impairment. Journal of the British Academy, 2(1), 43-58. doi: 10.5871/jba/002.043
dc.relation.referencesSnowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Nash, H. M., y Hulme, C. (2016). Language profiles and literacy outcomes of children with resolving, emerging, or persisting language impairments. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(12), 1360-1369. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12497
dc.relation.referencesSpencer, M., Kaschak, M. P., Jones, J. L., y Lonigan, C. J. (2015). Statistical learning is related to early literacy-related skills. Reading and Writing, 28(4), 467-490. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9533-0
dc.relation.referencesStanovich, K. E. (1989). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 360-407.
dc.relation.referencesStavonich, K., y Siegel, L. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of reading-disabled children: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
dc.relation.referencesSzegedi-Hallgató, E., Janacsek, K., y Nemeth, D. (2019). Different levels of statistical learning - Hidden potentials of sequence learning tasks. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0221966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221966
dc.relation.referencesTan, L.-H., y Perfetti, C. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing, 10(3-5), 165-200.
dc.relation.referencesThiessen, E. D. (2017). What's statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 372(1711), 20160056. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0056
dc.relation.referencesThiessen, E. D., Kronstein, A. T., y Hufnagle, D. G. (2013). The extraction and integration framework: a two-process account of statistical learning. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 792-814. doi:10.1037/a0030801
dc.relation.referencesThompson, P. A., Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., Hayiou-Thomas, E., y Snowling, M. J. (2015). Developmental dyslexia: predicting individual risk. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 56(9), 976-987. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12412
dc.relation.referencesTorkildsen, J. v. K., Arciuli, J., y Wie, O. B. (2019). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children's reading ability in a semi-transparent orthography. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 60-68. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.003
dc.relation.referencesTreiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children: Oxford University Press on Demand.
dc.relation.referencesTreiman, R. (2018). Statistical Learning and Spelling. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3s), 644-652. doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-stlt1-17-0122
dc.relation.referencesTurk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Chun, M. M., y Johnson, M. (2009). Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 21(10), 1934-1945. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21131
dc.relation.referencesVan der Kleij, S. W., Groen, M. A., Segers, E., y Verhoeven, L. (2019). Sequential Implicit Learning Ability Predicts Growth in Reading Skills in Typical Readers and Children with Dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 77-88. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1491582
dc.relation.referencesVandermosten, M., Wouters, J., Ghesquière, P., y Golestani, N. (2019). Statistical Learning of Speech Sounds in Dyslexic and Typical Reading Children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 116-127. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1473404
dc.relation.referencesVellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., y Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 45(1), 2-40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
dc.relation.referencesVieiro, P., y Gómez, I. (2004). Psicología de la lectura. España: Editorial Pearson.
dc.relation.referencesWaldie, K. E., Haigh, C. E., Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Buckley, J., y Kirk, I. J. (2013). Reading the Wrong Way with the Right Hemisphere. Brain sciences, 3(3), 1060-1075. doi: 10.3390/brainsci3031060
dc.relation.referencesWaldie, K. E., Wilson, A. J., Roberts, R. P., y Moreau, D. (2017). Reading network in dyslexia: Similar, yet different. Brain and Language, 174, 29-41. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2017.07.004
dc.relation.referencesWimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(1), 1-33. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010122
dc.relation.referencesXie, Q., Gao, X., y King, R. B. (2013). Thinking styles in implicit and explicit learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 267-271. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.014
dc.relation.referencesYang, J., y Li, P. (2012). Brain Networks of Explicit and Implicit Learning. PLOS ONE, 7(8), e42993. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042993
dc.relation.referencesYu, C. (2008). A Statistical Associative Account of Vocabulary Growth in Early Word Learning. Language Learning and Development, 4(1), 32-62. doi:10.1080/15475440701739353
dc.relation.referencesZiegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., y Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107(1), 151-178. doi:https:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.004
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalStatistical Learning
dc.subject.proposalLectura
dc.subject.proposalMovimientos oculares
dc.subject.proposalReading
dc.subject.proposalEye Movements
dc.subject.proposalOrtografía transparente
dc.subject.proposalDislexia
dc.subject.proposalDyslexia
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje estadístico
dc.subject.proposalOrthographic transparency
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito