Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Píldoras mágicas: los rostros de las drogas inteligentes

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorGómez Morales, Yuri Jack
dc.contributor.authorLondoño Bernal, Nicolás
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-01T14:53:04Z
dc.date.available2020-09-01T14:53:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-20
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78351
dc.description.abstractEl estudio de caso que presento a continuación retrata bajo un lente etnográfico el consumo de las llamadas “drogas inteligentes” (especialmente el Modafinil) en relatos de un grupo en la plataforma Facebook de estudiantes de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Los relatos recuperados de un inmenso número de estudiantes enlazan esta práctica de consumo tanto con la exigencia universitaria, como con sus propias expectativas de sí mismos, y hasta con las investigaciones en neurociencias. El detalle de la aproximación revela no solo las experticias de los estudiantes en sus prácticas de estudio, sino también las posibles controversias alrededor de la integración de objetos en ensamblajes sociotécnicos que desestabilizan la frontera de lo humano. Aquello conflictivo entre los discursos públicos de las filosofías universitarias en educación y el consumo de las drogas inteligentes en el escenario universitario, nos permite rastrear la reconfiguración de actores frente a la extensa red de la cultura de la auditoria enfrascada en los estándares de medición y evaluación universitaria
dc.description.abstractThe story in next few pages portray a case study with several ethnography insights: “Smart drugs” – as they are now called – in comments on a Facebook group mainly integrated by National University of Colombia Students. Massives text recovered link this consume practice with a huge range of universities measurement standards, but also with the same expectation of the students (specially the expectations on themselves) , and touch so far away academics fields like neurosciences. The small scope of the study and its detail reveals not only the consumer expertise of the students in their study practice, but go through controversies among the assemblage of non-human actors in socio technical networks that destabilize human boundaries. Clash between public discourses on universities education “philosophy” and Smart Drugs consumption allows us to track actors remaking amid audit cultures pent-up in evaluation measurement standards at universities.
dc.format.extent154
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales
dc.subject.ddc370 - Educación
dc.subject.ddc615 - Farmacología y terapéutica
dc.subject.ddc572 - Bioquímica
dc.titlePíldoras mágicas: los rostros de las drogas inteligentes
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Sociología
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesC. Shore and S. Wright, “Coercive accountability,” Audit Cult. Anthropol. Stud. accountability, ethics Acad., pp. 57–89, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesY. J. Gómez-Morales, “El baile de los que sobran: cambio cultural y evaluación académica,” Rev. Colomb. Antropol., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 15–25, 2017.
dc.relation.referencesT. Pérez-Bustos, “Mi tiempo ya no es mío: reflexiones encarnadas sobre la cienciometría,” Nómadas; Núm. 50 Conoc. desde el Sur debates Contemp. - 10.30578/nomadas.n50a2 , Aug. 2019.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, We have never been modern. Harvard university press, 2012.
dc.relation.referencesA. S. J. Borrero, “La universidad : estudio sobre sus orígenes, dinámicas y tendencias.” Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., 2008.
dc.relation.referencesJ. William, Pragmatismo. Madrid: SARPE, 1984.
dc.relation.referencesS. Timmermans and S. Epstein, “A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization,” Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 69–89, Jun. 2010.
dc.relation.referencesG. C. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesM. Power, The audit society. Brussels: European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, 1993.
dc.relation.referencesC. Ramírez Ajiaco, “Sin cita: la construcción del plagio como delito en el sistema penal colombiano,” Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá, 2020.
dc.relation.referencesM. J. Mulkay, “Methodology in the sociology of science: Some reflections on the study of radio astronomy,” Inf. (International Soc. Sci. Counc., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 107–119, 1974.
dc.relation.referencesD. Bloor, “El programa fuerte en sociología del conocimiento,” in Conocimiento e imaginario social, 1998.
dc.relation.referencesY. J. Gómez-Morales, “Abuso de las medidas y medidas abusivas. Crítica al pensamiento bibliométrico hegemónico,” Anu. Colomb. Hist. Soc. y la Cult. Vol. 45, Núm. 1 Hig. Cuerpo y Enferm., 2018.
dc.relation.referencesM. Strathern, “Introduction: new accountabilities: anthropological studies in audit, ethics and the academy,” in Audit cultures, Routledge, 2003, pp. 13–30.
dc.relation.referencesC. Shore, “Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability,” Anthropol. theory, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 278–298, 2008.
dc.relation.referencesS. Cole and J. R. Cole, “Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science,” Am. Sociol. Rev., pp. 377–390, 1967.
dc.relation.referencesR. K. Merton, “The normative structure of science,” in The sociology of science. Theoretical Empirical Investigations, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973, p. 630.
dc.relation.referencesI. I. Mitroff, “Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists,” Am. Sociol. Rev., pp. 579–595, 1974.
dc.relation.referencesM. Mulkay, “Interpretation and the use of rules: The case of the norms of science,” Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 39, no. 1 Series II, pp. 111–125, 1980.
dc.relation.referencesJ. D. Bernal, World without war. Routledge, 2019.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, “La tecnología es la sociedad hecha para que dure,” Sociol. simétrica. Ensayos sobre ciencia, Tecnol. y Soc., pp. 109–142, 1998.
dc.relation.referencesR. K. Merton, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago press, 1973.
dc.relation.referencesS. Shapin and S. Schaffer, “Leviathan and the air pump Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life ; with a new introduction by the authors.” Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ [u.a., 2011.
dc.relation.referencesY. J. Gómez-Morales, “Reconsiderar la innovación,” in Proyecto ensamblando en Colombia. Tomo II: Ensamblando Heteroglosias., Olga Restrepo Forero, Ed. Bogotá, D.C.: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Centro de Estudios Sociales (CES).
dc.relation.referencesR. Hernández Sampieri and C. P. Mendoza Torres, Metodología de la investigación : las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. 2018.
dc.relation.referencesH. Collins, Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. University of Chicago Press, 1992.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard university press, 1999
dc.relation.referencesJ. Law, After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesM. Foucault, El orden del discurso, Tusquets. Barcelona, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesR. Guber, La etnografía: método, campo y reflexividad, vol. 11. Editorial Norma, 2001.
dc.relation.referencesM. De la Cadena, Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Duke University Press, 2015.
dc.relation.referencesM. Strathern, “Partial Connections.” AltaMira Press, Lanham, 2005.
dc.relation.referencesA. Mol, The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press, 2002.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Clifford and G. E. Marcus, Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press, 1986.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Navarro Reyes and M. Dascal, Cómo hacer filosofía con palabras : a propósito del desencuentro entre Searle y Derrida. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2010.
dc.relation.referencesK. D. Knorr-Cetina, “The Manufacture of Knowledge : an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science.” Elsevier Science, Kent, 2014.
dc.relation.referencesM. Ashmore, The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. University of Chicago Press, 1989.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour and S. Woolgar, La vida en el laboratorio: la construcción de los hechos científicos, no. 167.23. Alianza Editorial, 1995.
dc.relation.referencesS. S. Jasanoff, “Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 195–230, May 1987.
dc.relation.referencesC. D. Conner, A People’s History of Science: Miners, Midwives, and Low Mechanicks. Hachette UK, 2009.
dc.relation.referencesH. M. Collins and R. Evans, “The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 235–296, 2002.
dc.relation.referencesA. Pickering, “Practice and Posthumanism: Social Theory and a History of Agency,” 2001.
dc.relation.referencesN. Myers, “Rendering Life Molecular : Models, Modelers, and Excitable Matter.” Duke University Press, Durham, 2015.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, “On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications, Plus More Than a Few Complications,” Philos. Lit. J. Logos, 2017.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, “On recalling ANT,” Sociol. Rev., vol. 47, no. S1, pp. 15–25, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesS. Jasanoff, “The idiom of co-production,” States Knowl. co-production Sci. Soc. order, pp. 1–12, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesC. Hine, Virtual ethnography. London: Sage, 2003.
dc.relation.referencesC. B. Jensen, A. Ballestero, M. de la Cadena, M. Fisch, and M. Ishii, “New ontologies? Reflections on some recent ‘turns’ in STS, anthropology and philosophy,” Soc. Anthropol., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 525–545, Nov. 2017.
dc.relation.referencesM. Callon, “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay,” Sociol. Rev., vol. 32, no. 1_suppl, pp. 196–233, 1984.
dc.relation.referencesS. Epstein, Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research. University of Chicago Press, 2008.
dc.relation.referencesB. Wynne, “¿ Pueden las ovejas pastar seguras? Una mirada reflexiva sobre la separación entre conocimiento experto-conocimiento lego,” Rev. Colomb. Sociol., no. 23, p. 109, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesN. E. J. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. MIT press, 2003.
dc.relation.referencesS. Timmermans and V. Leiter, “The redemption of thalidomide: Standardizing the risk of birth defects,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 41–71, 2000
dc.relation.referencesD. Haraway, “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective,” Fem. Stud., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 575–599, 1988.
dc.relation.referencesJ. A. Cervantes García and J. A. C. García, “Agua que no has de beber, déjala correr. Análisis de la controversia sobre la calidad del agua en Bogotá (2012 y el 2013),” Rev. Colomb. Sociol., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 89–113, Jul. 2016.
dc.relation.referencesS. L. Star, “Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions,” Sociol. Rev., vol. 38, no. S1, pp. 26–56, 1990.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern,” Crit. Inq., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225–248, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) and Consejo de organizaciones internacionales de la Ciencias médicas, Pautas éticas internacionales para la investigaciónrelacionada con la salud con seres humanos, 4th ed. Consejo de Organizaciones Internacionales de las Ciencias Médicas (CIOMS), 2016.
dc.relation.referencesA. Steward and M. Pickersgill, “Developing expertise, customising sleep, enhancing study practices: exploring the legitimisation of modafinil use within the accounts of UK undergraduate students,” Drugs Educ. Prev. Policy, pp. 1–9, 2019.
dc.relation.referencesU. Beck, La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Paidós ibérica, 1998.
dc.relation.referencesU. Beck and J. A. Rey, La sociedad del riesgo global. Siglo Veintiuno, 2002.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, “For David Bloor... and Beyond: A Reply to David Bloor’s’ Anti-Latour’,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., vol. 30, pp. 113–130, 1999
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, “Is Re-modernization Occurring - And If So, How to Prove It?: A Commentary on Ulrich Beck,” Theory, Cult. Soc., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 35–48, Apr. 2003.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Tulloch and D. Lupton, Risk and everyday life. Sage, 2003
dc.relation.referencesR. Robins, “The realness of risk: Gene technology in Germany,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 7–35, 2002.
dc.relation.referencesE. Mackey, “Constructing an endangered nation: Risk, race and rationality in Australia’s Native Title debate,” Risk Sociocult. theory New Dir. Perspect., pp. 108–130, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesS. Jasanoff, “Judgment under siege: The three-body problem of expert legitimacy,” in Democratization of expertise?, Springer, 2005, pp. 209–224.
dc.relation.referencesM. Viveros and L. G. Arango, “El género : una categoría útil para las ciencias sociales.” Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela de Estudios de G�nero, Grupo Interdisciplinario de Estudios de Género (GIEG), Bogotá D.C., 2014.
dc.relation.referencesJ. S. Obregón, Artes de vida, gobierno y contraconductas en las prácticas de sí. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Centro de Estudios Sociales, CES, Grupo Gobierno, Subjetividades y Prácticas de Sí, 2014.
dc.relation.referencesM. Foucault, “El sujeto y el poder,” Rev. Mex. Sociol., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 3–20, 1988.
dc.relation.referencesG. Deleuze, Curso sobre Foucault: La subjetivación. Cactus, 2015.
dc.relation.referencesM. Foucault and M. Morey, Tecnologías del yo: y otros textos afines. Paidós, 1990.
dc.relation.referencesN. Rose, Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. Taylor & Frances/Routledge, 1990.
dc.relation.referencesW. Betancourt Mosquera and W. B. Mosquera, “Expertos, metaexperticias y mediadores. Supervisión ética de la investigación en escenarios multidisciplinares,” Rev. Colomb. Sociol., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 203–220, Jul. 2016.
dc.relation.referencesG. Deleuze, “¿ Qué es un dispositivo,” Michel foucault, filósofo, pp. 155–163, 1990.
dc.relation.referencesN. Rose, “Neurochemical selves,” Society, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 46–59, 2003.
dc.relation.referencesN. Rose, The Politics of Life Itself : Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
dc.relation.referencesU. Müller, J. B. Rowe, T. Rittman, C. Lewis, T. W. Robbins, and B. J. Sahakian, “Effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognition, task enjoyment and creative thinking in healthy volunteers,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 490–495, Jan. 2013.
dc.relation.referencesS. Woolgar and D. Neyland, Mundane governance: Ontology and accountability. OUP Oxford, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesE. Aguilar, “Empresarios de sí mismos. Literatura de autoayuda y el mercado en red en la constitución de sujetos ético-económicos,” Artes vida, Gob. y contraconductas en las prácticas sí, pp. 105–141, 2014.
dc.relation.referencesN. Oudshoorn, “Sustaining cyborgs: Sensing and tuning agencies of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 56–76, Dec. 2014.
dc.relation.referencesM. Puig de la Bellacasa, Matters of care : speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.
dc.relation.referencesP. K. Nayar, Posthumanism. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
dc.relation.referencesM. More and N. Vita-More, The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesA. Clark, “Re-inventing ourselves: The plasticity of embodiment, sensing, and mind,” J. Med. Philos., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 263–282, 2007.
dc.relation.referencesL. R. Kass, “Ageless bodies, happy souls: Biotechnology and the pursuit of perfection,” New Atl., no. 1, pp. 9–28, 2003.
dc.relation.referencesD. J. Haraway, The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness, vol. 1. Prickly Paradigm Press Chicago, 2003.
dc.relation.referencesD. Haraway, Manifiesto cyborg. Kaótica Libros, 1991.
dc.relation.referencesH. R. Maturana and F. J. Varela, The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library/Shambhala Publications, 1987.
dc.relation.referencesC. Wolfe, What is posthumanism?, vol. 8. U of Minnesota Press, 2010.
dc.relation.referencesH. Rose, “Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences,” Signs J. Women Cult. Soc., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 73–90, 1983.
dc.relation.referencesM. P. de la Bellacasa, “Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 85–106, Feb. 2011.
dc.relation.referencesS. Alaimo, Exposed: Environmental politics and pleasures in posthuman times. U of Minnesota Press, 2016.
dc.relation.referencesD. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesK. Barad, “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter,” Signs J. Women Cult. Soc., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 801–831, 2003.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, “‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts,’” in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, W. Bijker and J. Law, Eds. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992, pp. 225–258.
dc.relation.referencesS. Shapin, “The invisible technician,” Am. Sci., vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 554–563, 1989.
dc.relation.referencesK. Barad, Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press, 2007.
dc.relation.referencesD. J. Hess, “Science in an era of globalization: Alternative pathways,” in The postcolonial science and technology studies reader, Sandra Har., Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2011, pp. 419–438.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour, “Centros de cálculo,” in Ciencia en acción. Cómo seguir a los científicos e ingenieros través de la sociedadacción, Barcelona: Labor, 1992, pp. 205–245.
dc.relation.referencesS. L. Star, “Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On being Allergic to Onions,” Sociol. Rev., vol. 38, no. 1_suppl, pp. 26–56, May 1990.
dc.relation.referencesT. Pérez-Bustos, “Mi tiempo ya no es mío: reflexiones encarnadas sobre la cienciometría,” Nómadas, no. 50, pp. 35–43, 2019.
dc.relation.referencesS. L. Star and J. R. Griesemer, “Institutional ecology,translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 387–420, 1989.
dc.relation.referencesS. Leigh Star, “This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 601–617, 2010.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalSocial studies of science
dc.subject.proposalEstudios sociales de la ciencia
dc.subject.proposalCultura de la auditoría
dc.subject.proposalAudit culture
dc.subject.proposalSmart drugs
dc.subject.proposalDrogas inteligentes
dc.subject.proposalModafinil
dc.subject.proposalModafinil
dc.subject.proposalUniversity
dc.subject.proposalUniversidad
dc.subject.proposalPrácticas de sí
dc.subject.proposalTechnologies of the self
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
license_rdf
Tamaño:
805bytes
Formato:
application/rdf+xml
Descargar
Thumbnail
Nombre:
1014244841.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
3.540Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito