Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento
Metodología para identificar y medir KPIs logísticos para el sector agroindustrial colombiano
dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional |
dc.contributor.advisor | Adarme Jaimes, Wilson |
dc.contributor.author | Riaño Pinzón, Javier |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-15T16:34:48Z |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-15T16:34:48Z |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12-20 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78762 |
dc.description.abstract | This document proposes a methodology to establish Key Perforance Indicators for agroindustrial chains in Colombia. To that end, it starts from the verification of the public policy that guides the productivity and competitiveness processes in the country, as well as the regulation of logistics activity (CONPES 3527 and 3547 of 2008, updated with CONPES 3982 of 2020). Subsequently, a bibliographic review is made, the characterization of the agro-industrial sector, as well as an analysis of the country's logistics performance using the LPI methodology developed by the World Bank as a reference framework. Additionally, an analysis of administrative tools was made which served as the basis for the generation of the proposed methodology, through which it is possible to determine the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Finally, some contributions to Public Policy were enunciated with a view to its updating and implementation in the face of the new challenges on the world context. Among the main findings is that (i) public policy for competitiveness and productivity in Colombia is susceptible to updating, since it falls short of the new challenges posed by international trade; (ii) there is not much academic literature that deals with Key Performance Indicators, logistics and agribusiness, in particular, for a context such as Colombia; (iii) it is necessary to improve the ranking of the 6 components of the LPI, this will allow greater reliability and the opening of new trade agreements with other countries; (iv) it is possible to integrate technical and administrative tools that allow the development of a methodology to identify key logistics performance indicators in the Colombian agroindustrial sector, such as data envelopment analysis, the SCOR model, benchmarking, the Balanced Scorecard, among others; (v) developing a consistent and adequate methodology will allow advancement of public policy on productivity and competitiveness in the country's logistics processes through the identification and measurement of KPIs; and (vi) generation of contributions to Public Policy on logistics issues, particularly CONPES 3527 of 2008 and CONPES 3982 of 2020. |
dc.description.abstract | Este trabajo propone una metodología para la establecer Indicadores Clave de Desempeño logístico para cadenas agroindustriales en Colombia. Para ello, se parte de la verificación de la política pública que orienta los procesos de productividad y competitividad en el país, así como la regulación de la actividad logística (CONPES 3527 y 3547 de 2008, actualizado con el CONPES 3982 de 2020). Posteriormente, se hace una revisión bibliográfica, la caracterización del sector agroindustrial, así como un análisis del desempeño logístico del país usando como marco de referencia la metodología LPI desarrollada por el Banco Mundial. Adicionalmente, se analizaron una serie de herramientas administrativas que sirvieron de base para la generación de la metodología propuesta, mediante la cual es posible determinar los Indicadores Clave de Desempeño (KPIs). Por último, se enunciaron algunos aportes a la Política Pública de cara a su actualización y puesta en marcha frente a los nuevos desafíos del panorama mundial. Dentro de los principales hallazgos se encuentra que (i) la política pública para competitividad y productividad en Colombia es susceptible de actualizarse, puesto que se queda corta frente a los nuevos desafíos propuestos por el comercio internacional; (ii) no existe mucha literatura académica que trate temas de Indicadores Clave de Desempeño, logística y agroindustria, en particular, para un contexto como el colombiano; (iii) se hace necesario mejorar el posicionamiento en el ranking de los 6 componentes del LPI, esto permitirá mayor confiabilidad y apertura de nuevos acuerdos comerciales con otros países; (iv) es posible integrar herramientas técnicas y administrativas que permitan desarrollar una metodología de identificación de indicadores clave desempeño logístico en el sector agroindustrial colombiano, como son el análisis envolvente de datos, el modelo SCOR, el benchmarking, el Balanced Scorecard, entre otros; (v) desarrollar una metodología congruente y adecuada permitirá un avance de la política pública para el tema de productividad y competitividad en los procesos logísticos del país a través de la identificación y medición de KPIs; y (vi) generación de aportes a la Política Pública en temas logísticos en particular a los CONPES 3527 de 2008 y CONPES 3982 de 2020. |
dc.format.extent | 101 |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf |
dc.language.iso | spa |
dc.rights | Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.subject.ddc | 620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería |
dc.title | Metodología para identificar y medir KPIs logísticos para el sector agroindustrial colombiano |
dc.type | Otro |
dc.rights.spa | Acceso abierto |
dc.description.additional | Línea de Investigación: Gestión de Operaciones - Logística |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrial |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | SOCIEDAD, ECONOMIA Y PRODUCTIVIDAD - \'SEPRO\' |
dc.description.degreelevel | Maestría |
dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
dc.relation.references | Arvis, J.-F., Saslavsky, D., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Busch, C., Raj, A., & Naula, T. (2016). Connecting to Compete 2016 Trade Logistics in the Global Economy The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/24598 |
dc.relation.references | Ashby, A., Leat, M. & Hudson-Smith, M. (2012). Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 497-516. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258573 |
dc.relation.references | Austin, J. E. (1987). Análisis de proyectos Agroindustriales, Madrid, Tecnos. |
dc.relation.references | Banomyong, R., Basnet, C., Childerhouse, P., Dekins, E., Disney, S.M., Naim, M.M. & Towill, D.R. (2005). Internationalising the quick scan audit methodology, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Production Research, Salerno. |
dc.relation.references | Bai Ch., Sarkis J., (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics Volume 124(1), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.023 |
dc.relation.references | Bai, Ch., Sarkis, J. (2012). Supply-chain performance-measurement system management using neighbourhood rough sets. International Journal of Production Research, 50(9), 2484-2500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.581010 |
dc.relation.references | Bai, Ch., Sarkis J.. (2014). Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0441 |
dc.relation.references | Bai, Ch., Sarkis J. (2018). Integrating and extending data and decision tools for sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider selection. Computers & Operations Research, 110, 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.06.005 |
dc.relation.references | Beamon, B.M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(3), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910249714 |
dc.relation.references | Beynon, et-al.. (2000). DS/AHP method: A mathematical analysis, including an understanding of uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research Volume 140(1), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00230-2 |
dc.relation.references | Boletín Delegada De Puertos Iv Trimestre (Acumulado del 2015). (2016). [Informe] Bogotá. |
dc.relation.references | Boletín Estadístico Tráfico Portuario En Colombia Año 2016. (2017). [Informe] Bogotá. |
dc.relation.references | Boletín Estadístico Tráfico Portuario En Colombia Año 2017. (2018). [Informe] Bogotá. |
dc.relation.references | Bosc, P., Prade, H.(1993). An introduction to fuzzy set and possibility theory based approaches to the treatment of uncertainty and imprecision in database management systems. Proc. Of Second Workshop Uncertainty management in Information Systems: from Needs to Solutions, California. |
dc.relation.references | Cabral, I., Grilo, A. & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). A decision-making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4830-4845. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.657970 |
dc.relation.references | Calderón Lama, J. P. y García-Sataber, J.P. (2009). Modelo para la planificación de operaciones en cadenas de suministro de productos de innovación. Revista DYNA, 84, 517-526. https://doi.org/10.6036/2451 |
dc.relation.references | Chae, B. (2009). Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: an industry perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(6), 422-428.https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910995192 |
dc.relation.references | Childerhouse P., Towill D.R. (2011). Effective supply chain research via the quick scan audit methodology. Supply Chain Management, 16(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111103458 |
dc.relation.references | Chu, X-Z. et-al. (2010). An expert system using rough sets theory and self-organizing maps to design space exploration of complex products. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7364–7372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.029 |
dc.relation.references | Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley. |
dc.relation.references | Departamento Administrativo Nacional De Estadística. (2012). Dirección de Síntesis y Cuentas Nacionales, Grupo de cuentas satélites, Cuenta satélite piloto de la agroindustria (Aspectos Conceptuales). |
dc.relation.references | Departamento Nacional De Planeación. (2008). CONPES 3527 Política Nacional de Competitividad y Productividad. |
dc.relation.references | Departamento Nacional De Planeación. (2008). CONPES 3547 Política Nacional Logística. |
dc.relation.references | Departamento Nacional De Planeación. (2009). CONPES 3568 Seguimiento al Conpes 3547 del 27 de 0ctubre de 2008: Política Nacional Logística. |
dc.relation.references | Departamento Nacional De Planeación. (2010). CONPES 3668 Informe de Seguimiento a la Política Nacional de Competitividad y Productividad Ley 1253 De 2008. |
dc.relation.references | Departamento Nacional De Planeación. (2020). CONPES 3982 Política Nacional Logística. |
dc.relation.references | Dinter, B. (2013). Success factors for information logistics strategy — An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1207-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.09.001 |
dc.relation.references | Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S. & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339 |
dc.relation.references | Greco, S. et-al. (2001). Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00167-3 |
dc.relation.references | Grupo de Investigación SEPRO (Sociedad - Economía y Productividad) Universidad Nacional de Colombia (2018). Proyecto de Investigación Formando al Nuevo Campo, Cadena de suministro aguacate HASS, Municipio de Timbio, Departamento del Cauca. |
dc.relation.references | Gunasekaran, A., Kobu, B. (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2819-2840. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600806513 |
dc.relation.references | Hu, Q., Yu, D., Liu, J. & Wu, C. (2008). Neighborhood rough set based heterogeneous feature subset selection. Information Sciences, 178(18), 3577-3594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.024 |
dc.relation.references | Huan, S.H., Sheoran, S.K. & Wang, G. (2004). A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410517557 |
dc.relation.references | Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1979) El Cuadro de Mando Integral, Gestión 2000, 2009. Malassis, L’ Economie Alimentaire. Ed. Cuyas, París |
dc.relation.references | Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. |
dc.relation.references | Kleijnen, J.P., Smits, M.T. (2003). Performance metrics in supply chain management. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(5), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601539 |
dc.relation.references | Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Dirección de Capacidades Productivas y Generación de Ingresos. (2019). Plan de Agrologística: Marco estratégico y de lineamientos. |
dc.relation.references | Mirhedayatian, S.M., Azadi, M. & Saen, R.F. (2014). A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(B), 544-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.009 |
dc.relation.references | Möller, A., Schaltegger, S. (2005). The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco-efficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247927 |
dc.relation.references | Mora G., L. A. (2008). Indicadores de la gestión logística KPI. Bogotá: Ecoe Ediciones. |
dc.relation.references | Muñoz M., Fernández M., Rivera J., Ferrero I., Escrig E., Guisbert J. & Chiara M., (2018). An Assessment Tool to Integrate Sustainability Principles into the Global Supply Chain. Sustainability, 10(2), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020535 |
dc.relation.references | La Rovere, E.L., Soares, J.B., Oliveira, L.B. & Lauria, T. (2010). Sustainable expansion of electricity sector: sustainability indicators as an instrument to support decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (1), 422-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.033 |
dc.relation.references | Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets. International Journal of Information & Computer Sciences, 11, 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001956 |
dc.relation.references | Proexport, Sociedad de Agricultores de Colombia (SAC), (2010). Invierta en Colombia, Trabajo, Compromiso, Ingenio. Sector Agroindustrial Colombiano I (I). |
dc.relation.references | Qorri A., Mujkic Z. & Kraslawski A. (2018). A conceptual framework for measuring sustainability performance of supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 570-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.073 |
dc.relation.references | Ramírez, M.L., (2013). Colombia frente a los indicadores mundiales aciertos, fallos y oportunidades para una hoja de Ruta. Coalición para la promoción de la industria colombiana. |
dc.relation.references | Sadoyan, H., Zakarian, A. & Mohanty, P. Data mining algorithm for manufacturing process control. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 28, 342-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2367-1 |
dc.relation.references | Sanín A, J. (2007). Desarrollo del Transporte en Colombia (1492-2007). Bogotá. |
dc.relation.references | Schaeffer, G. (1992), “Exchange of quick scan know-how in EUNiL”, Draft DW1392-b, internal document, Eindhoven University, Eindhoven. |
dc.relation.references | Talluri, S., Sarkis, J. (2002). A model for performance monitoring of suppliers. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (16), 4257-4269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540210152894 |
dc.relation.references | Websiex.dian.gov.co. (2018). Sistema estadístico de Comercio Exterior. [online] Disponibel en: http://websiex.dian.gov.co/siex/index.html [Acceso 23 de Agosto de 2018]. |
dc.relation.references | Wudhikarn R., Chakpitak N. & Neubert, G. (2018). A literature review on performance measures of logistics management: an intellectual capital perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 19, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1431414 |
dc.relation.references | Zhu, Q., Dou, Y. & Sarkis, J. (2010). A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(4), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541011054670 |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject.proposal | Logistics |
dc.subject.proposal | Logística |
dc.subject.proposal | Supply Chain |
dc.subject.proposal | Cadena de suministro |
dc.subject.proposal | Indicadores Clave de Desempeño (KPI) |
dc.subject.proposal | Key Performance Indicators (KPI) |
dc.subject.proposal | Supply-Chain Operations Reference-model (SCOR) |
dc.subject.proposal | Supply-Chain Operations Reference-model (SCOR) |
dc.subject.proposal | Sector Agroindustrial |
dc.subject.proposal | Agro-industrial Sector |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843 |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa |
dc.type.content | Text |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
Archivos en el documento
Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
![Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional](/themes/Mirage2//images/creativecommons/cc-generic.png)