Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Procedimientos en obstetricia : Texto guı́a para la enseñanza y aplicación de técnicas quirúrgicas y no quirúrgicas en los distintos procedimientos desarrollados en el área de la obstetricia. Tomo II

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorAngel Muller, Edith
dc.contributor.authorSandoval Angulo, Astrid Lizeth
dc.contributor.authorToro Bolaños, Jesus Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T16:40:51Z
dc.date.available2021-01-25T16:40:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78902
dc.description.abstractContinuing with the book "PROCEDURES IN OBSTETRICS, A Guide for the Teaching and Application of Surgical and Non-Surgical Techniques in the Different Procedures Developed in Obstetrics", we have produced the second volume, where we continue to set out the practical concepts in different procedures that were not covered in the first book, always based on the most up-to-date evidence available. We are confident that our readers will be able to obtain clear information, playful and as close to reality as possible, and with this, when they are in front of their patients they will have the peace of mind of having already had a similar experience.
dc.description.abstractContinuando con el libro “PROCEDIMIENTOS EN OBSTETRICIA Texto guı́a para la enseñanza y aplicación de técnicas quirúrgicas y no quirúrgicas en los distintos procedimientos desarrollados en el área de la obstetricia”, Realizamos el segundo tomo, donde se continuan plasmando los conceptos prácticos en diferentes procedimientos en obstetricia que no se alcanzaron abarcar en el primer libro, siempre basados en la evidencia más actualizada disponible. Tenemos la confianza en que nuestros lectores podrán obtener la información de una forma clara, lúdica y lo más cercana a la realidad posible, y con ello, cuando estén frente a sus pacientes tendrán la tranquilidad de ya haber tenido una experiencia similar.
dc.format.extent92
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::618 - Ginecología, obstetricia, pediatría, geriatría
dc.titleProcedimientos en obstetricia : Texto guı́a para la enseñanza y aplicación de técnicas quirúrgicas y no quirúrgicas en los distintos procedimientos desarrollados en el área de la obstetricia. Tomo II
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicas
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.references1. Manuel Sedano L, Cecilia
Sedano M, Rodrigo Sedano M. Re-
seña histórica e hitos de la obste-
tricia. Rev Médica Clínica Las
Condes [Internet].
2014;25(6):866–73. Available fro-
m: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0716-8640(14)70632-7
dc.relation.references2. Cuadro 4, nacimientos
2018, DANE, Colombia 2018, dis-
ponible en https://www.dane.gov
.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-
tema/salud/nacimientos-y-de-
funciones/nacimientos..
dc.relation.references3. Wagman H. Caesarean
section rates. Lancet.
1993;342(8885):1490.
dc.relation.references4. Orlando M, Pineda P.
Obstetricia integral. TOMO II.
dc.relation.references5. Zhang J, Landy HJ, Ware
Branch D, Burkman R, Haberman
S, Gregory KD, et al. Contempo-
rary patterns of spontaneous labor
with normal neonatal outcomes.
Obstet Gynecol.
2010;116(6):1281–7.
dc.relation.references6. Zhang J, Troendle J,
Mikolajczyk R, Sundaram R, Bea-
ver J, Fraser W. The Normal First
Stage of Labor. Obs Gynecol.
2010;115(4):705–10.
dc.relation.references7. WHO recommendations
for Induction of labour. World
Health Organization 2011- dispo-
nibleen en: https://www.who.int/
reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/
9789241501156/en/
dc.relation.referencesShields LE, Goffman D,
Caughey AB. ACOG practice bu-
lletin: Clinical management guide-
lines for obstetrician-gynecologis-
ts. Obstet Gynecol.
2017;130(4):e168–86.

dc.relation.referencesSummers L. Methods of
cervical ripening and labor induc-
tion. J Nurse Midwifery.
1997;42(2):71–85.
dc.relation.referencesThomas J, Fairclough A,
Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ. Vaginal
prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a)
for induction of labour at term.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2014;2014(6).
dc.relation.referencesHeba Mahdy ; Christo-
pher Glowacki ; Frederick U.
EruoAmniotomy - StatPearls -
NCBI Bookshelf. Last Update:
May 5, 2020.
dc.relation.referencesBricker L, Luckas M. Am-
niotomy alone for induction of
labour. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2000;(4)
dc.relation.referencesSmyth RMD, Alldred SK,
Markham C. Amniotomy for
shortening spontaneous labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2013;2013(1)
dc.relation.referencesHuntley AL, Coon JT,
Ernst E. Complementary and
alternative medicine for labor pain: A systematic review. Am J Obs-
tet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):36–44.
dc.relation.referencesACOG. Clinical Mana-
gement Guidelines for Obste-
trician – Gynecologists. Obstet
Gynecol. 2019;133(76):168–86.
dc.relation.referencesCurran MJA. Epidural
analgesia for labor and delivery.
Anesthesiol Clin North America.
1990;8(1):55–75.
dc.relation.referencesLumbiganon P, Thinkham-
rop J, Thinkhamrop B, Tolosa JE.
Vaginal chlorhexidine during
labour for preventing maternal
and neonatal infections (excluding
Group B Streptococcal and HIV).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2014;2014(9)
dc.relation.referencesCôrtes CT, de Oliveira
SMJV, dos Santos RCS, Francisco
AA, Riesco MLG, Shimoda GT.
Implementação das práticas ba-
seadas em evidências na assis-
tência ao parto normal. Rev Lat
Am Enfermagem. 2018;26.
dc.relation.referencesPereira LR, Rodrigues
GMM, Ferreira EDS, Barros INM,
Carneiro MS, Siqueira LS. PARTO
NORMAL E INTERVENÇÕES
OCORRIDAS EM UMA MATER-
NIDADE PÚBLICA. Rev Baiana
Enfermagem‏ [Internet]. 2020 Jan
29 [cited 2020 Feb 4];33. Availab-
le from: https://portalseer.ufba.br/
index.php/enfermagem/article/
view/32631
dc.relation.referencesKibuka M, Thornton JG.
Position in the second stage of
labour for women with epidural
anaesthesia. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2017;2017(2).
dc.relation.referencesWalker KF, Kibuka M,
Thornton JG, Jones NW. Maternal
position in the second stage of
labour for women with epidural
anaesthesia. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2018;2018(11)
dc.relation.referencesLawrence A, Lewis L, Ho-
fmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal posi-
tions and mobility during first sta-
ge labour. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2013;2013(10).

dc.relation.referencesLawrence A, Lewis L, Ho-
fmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal posi-
tions and mobility during first sta-
ge labour. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2013;2013(10).

dc.relation.referencesSuárez-Cortés M, Armero-
Barranco D, Canteras-Jordana M,
Martínez-Roche ME. Uso e
influência dos Planos de Parto e
Nascimento no processo de parto
humanizado. Rev Lat Am Enferma-
gem. 2015;23(3):520–6.

dc.relation.referencesBonet M, Ota E, Chibueze
CE, Oladapo OT. Reducing mater-
nal infectious morbidity ( Review ).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2017;(11).
dc.relation.referencesOluwalana C, Camara B,
Bottomley C, Goodier S, Bojang A,
Kampmann B, et al. Azithromycin
in labor lowers clinical infections
in mothers and newborns: A doub-
le-blind trial. Pediatrics.
2017;139(2).
dc.relation.referencesLemos A, Mmr A, A DDA,
Ai DS, Je CF, Jb C. Pushing/bea-
ring downmethods for the second stage of labour (Review). Cochra-
ne database Syst Rev.
2017;(3):10–3.
dc.relation.referencesPrins M, Boxem J, Lucas
C, Hutton E. Effect of spontaneous
pushing versus Valsalva pushing in
the second stage of labour on mo-
ther and fetus: A systematic review
of randomised trials. BJOG An Int
J Obstet Gynaecol.
2011;118(6):662–70.

dc.relation.referencesCorrêa Junior M, Passini
Júnior R. Selective Episiotomy:
Indications, Techinique, and Asso-
ciation with Severe Perineal
Lacerations. Rev Bras Ginecol e
Obs / RBGO Gynecol Obstet.
2016;38(06):301–7.

dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organi-
zation. WHO Recommendation on
Episiotomy Policy. WHO Reprod
Heal Libr [Internet]. 2018;(Fe-
bruary):1–10. Available from:
https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/
preconception-pregnancy-child-
birth-and-postpartum-care/care-
during-childbirth/care-during-
labour-2nd-stage/who-recommen-
dation-episiotomy-policy-0

dc.relation.referencesM. Berzaín, L. Camacho
Episiotomía: Procedimiento a
elección y no de rutina. Rev Cient
Cienc Med 2014; 17(2): 53-57
dc.relation.referencesRCOG. Operative Vaginal
Delivery - Green-top Guideline
No. 26. 2011;(26):19. Available
from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/glo-
balassets/documents/guidelines/
gtg_26.pdf

dc.relation.referencesRoyal College of Obste-
tricians and Gynaecologist-s.Operative Vaginal Delivery
Green-top Guideline No. 26. 2011
dc.relation.referencesPergialiotis V, Bellos I,
Fanaki M, Vrachnis N, Doumou-
chtsis SK. Risk factors for severe
perineal trauma during childbirth:
An updated meta-analysis. Eur J
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
[Internet]. 2020;247:94–100.
Available from: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.025

dc.relation.referencesMarty N, Verspyck E.
Perineal tears and episiotomy:
Surgical procedure – CNGOF
perineal prevention and protection
in obstetrics guidelines. Gynecol
Obstet Fertil Senol.
2018;46(12):948–67.

dc.relation.referencesMacleod M, Strachan B,
Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van
De Venne M, et al. A prospective
cohort study of maternal and neo-
natal morbidity in relation to use
of episiotomy at operative vaginal
delivery. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gy-
naecol. 2008;115(13):1688–94.

dc.relation.referencesönsson ER, Elfaghi I,
Rydhström H, Herbst A. Modified
Ritgen’s Maneuver for Anal
Sphincter Injury at Delivery. Obs-
tet Gynecol. 2008;112(2, Part
1):212–7.
dc.relation.referencesI SXXIT, Orlando M, Pineda P.
Obstetricia integral. TOMO II.
Primera ed. Cap-Distocias M.
Mercado. 2009. pag 275 - 300

dc.relation.referencesDystocia S. Practice Bulletin
No. 178 Summary: Shoulder Dys-
tocia. Obstet Gynecol.
2017;129(5):961–2.

dc.relation.referencesGherman RB, Chauhan S, Ou-
zounian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B,
Goodwin TM. Shoulder dystocia:
The unpreventable obstetric
emergency with empiric mana-
gement guidelines. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2006;195(3):657–72.
dc.relation.referencesShimada N. Shoulder dystocia
(1). [Josanpu zasshi] Japanese J
midwife. 1986;40(8):731.
dc.relation.referencesDandolu V, Lawrence L, Gau-
ghan JP, Grotegut C, Harmanli
OH, Jaspan D, et al. Trends in the
rate of shoulder dystocia over two
decades. 2005;18(Novembe-
r):305–10.
dc.relation.referencesBeall MH, Spong C, McKay J,
Ross MG. Objective definition of
shoulder dystocia: A prospective
evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1998;179(4):934–7.

dc.relation.referencesRosario M De. Consenso De
Obstetricia. Fasgo. 2005;10.
dc.relation.referencesG. Vargas. Fetal origins of adult
disease . Rev Horiz Med.
2012;12(2):41–5.
dc.relation.referencesLeung TY, Stuart O, Sahota DS,
Suen SSH, Lau TK, Lao TT. Head-
to-body delivery interval and risk of fetal acidosis and hypoxic is-
chaemic encephalopathy in
shoulder dystocia: A retrospective
review. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gy-
naecol. 2011;118(4):474–9.
dc.relation.referencesGherman RB, Goodwin TM,
Souter I, Neumann K, Ouzounian
JG, Paul RH. The McRoberts’ma-
neuver for the alleviation of
shoulder dystocia: How successful
is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1997;176(3):656–61.

dc.relation.referencesT. Gesner AT. Artículo de ma-
niobra de McRobert [Internet].
01-2020. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 8].
p. 7. Available from: https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK537280/

dc.relation.referencesHombros DDE. COLLEGE OF
OBSTETRICIAN AND GY-
NAECOLOGIST . Green-top Gui-
deline No . 42 2nd edition | March.
2013;1–6.

dc.relation.referencesTroncoso CAR. Manual de
Obstetricia y Ginecología. Octava
Edición. 2017. 1. Chile.
2017;(agosto):1–624.

dc.relation.referencesSandberg EC. The Zavanelli
maneuver: A potentially revolutio-
nary method for the resolution of
shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet
Gynecol [Internet].
1985;152(4):479–84. Available
from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0002-9378(85)80161-7

dc.relation.referencesErsdal HL, Verkuyl DAA, Bjö-
rklund K, Bergström S. Symphysio-
tomy in Zimbabwe; postoperative
outcome, width of the symphysis. joint, and knowledge, attitudes and
practice among doctors and mi-
dwives. PLoS One.
2008;3(10).

dc.relation.referencesHoffman MK, Bailit JL, Bran-
ch DW, Burkman RT, Van Veldhu-
sien P, Lu L, et al. A comparison of
obstetric maneuvers for the acute
management of shoulder dystocia.
Obstet Gynecol.
2011;117(6):1272–8.

dc.relation.referencesGrillo-Ardila CF, Bautista-
Charry AA, Diosa-Restrepo M.
Atención del parto con feto en pre-
sentación pelviana: revisión de la
semiología, el mecanismo y la
atención del parto. Rev Colomb
Obstet Ginecol. 2019;70(4):253–65
dc.relation.referencesCommittee H, Board R,
Members HC, Disclosure AA, Co-
mmittee H, Zealand N, et al. Ma-
nagement of Breech Presentation
at Term Background. R Aust New
Zeal Coll Obstet Gynaecol.
2013;(February 2001):1–9.

dc.relation.referencespdate I. INTERIM UP-
DATE Mode of Term Singleton
Breech Delivery.
2018;132(745):60–3.

dc.relation.referencesPetrovska K, Sheehan A,
Homer CSE. The fact and the fic-
tion: A prospective study of inter-
net forum discussions on vaginal
breech birth. Women and Birth
[Internet]. 2017;30(2):e96–102.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.wombi.2016.09.012.
dc.relation.referencesFonseca A, Silva R, Rato I, Ne-
ves AR, Peixoto C, Ferraz Z, et al.
Breech presentation: Vaginal ver-
sus cesarean delivery, which
intervention leads to the best outco-
mes? Acta Med Port.
2017;30(6):479–84.

dc.relation.referencesLydon-Rochelle M, Albers L,
Gotwocia J, Craig E, Qualls C.
Accuracy of Leopold Maneuvers in
Screening for Malpresentation: A
Prospective Study. Birth.
1993;20(3):132–5.

dc.relation.referencesACOG. Clinical Management
Guidelines for Obstetrician – Gy-
necologists. Obstet Gynecol.
2019;133(76):168–86.
dc.relation.referencesMaternofetal PM. Versión ce-
fálica externa. Clin Barcelona
Hosp Univ. :1–6.

dc.relation.referencesRao A, Cuthbertson A, Rao A,
Moon S, Moon S, Moon S. MANA-
GEMENT OF BREECH BIRTH
Register No : 04269 Status : Pub-
lic Purpose Equality and Diversity
Background Antenatal Mana-
gement Intrapartum Management
for Planned Vaginal Breech De-
livery – First Stage Second Stage
Problems with Delivering Breech
Management . 2018;(April
2011):1–13.
dc.relation.referencesYeoh SGJ, Rolnik DL, Regan
JA, Lee PYA. Experience and
confidence in vaginal breech and twin deliveries among obstetric
trainees and new specialists in
Australia and New Zealand. Aust
New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol.
2019;59(4):545–9.

dc.relation.referencesUniversité Médicale Virtuelle
Francophone. Manœuvres obsté-
tricales. 2014;1–29.

dc.relation.referencesDuffy CR, Moore JL, Saleem S,
Tshefu A, Bose CL, Chomba E, et
al. Malpresentation in low- and
middle-income countries: Asso-
ciations with perinatal and mater-
nal outcomes in the Global Netwo-
rk. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2019;98(3):300–8.
dc.relation.referencesOmbo K. Renacimiento de los
fórceps paralelos , las Espátulas de
Thierry . José Lattus Olmos. :1–55.
dc.relation.referencesAlban Doran. Chronology of the
Fonders of the forceps. JOurnal of
ostetrics and gynecology 1569 -
1799

dc.relation.referencesCunningham Gary Williams.
Obstetricia. 25ª Edición – chapter
29, delivery operative McGraw-
Hill 2019.

dc.relation.referencesCortés H, Escobar E. Parto va-
ginal instrumentado en el Hospital
Universitario San Vicente de Paúl
durante un periodo de 5 años
(2000-2004), Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol.
2006;57(1):27–30.

dc.relation.referencesCuadro 4, nacimientos 2018
preliminar, DANE, Colombia
2018, disponible en

dc.relation.referencesCuadro 4, nacimientos 2018
preliminar, DANE, Colombia
2018, disponible en
https://www.dane.gov.co/index.ph-
p/estadisticas-por-tema/salud/
nacimientos-y-defunciones/nacimientos.
dc.relation.referencesMurphy DJ, Strachan BK, Bahl
R. Assisted Vaginal Birth: Green-
top Guideline No. 26. BJOG An Int
J Obstet Gynaecol.
2020;127(9):e70–112.

dc.relation.referencesDelivery OV. ACOG Practice
Bulletin No. 154: Operative Vagi-
nal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol.
2015;126(5):e56–65.

dc.relation.referencesHoran MA, Murphy DJ.
Operative vaginal delivery. Obstet
Gynaecol Reprod Med [Internet].
2016;26(12):358–63. Available
from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.ogrm.2016.09.003

dc.relation.referencesKnight M, Chiocchia V, Partlett
C, Rivero-Arias O, Hua X, Hins-
haw K, et al. Prophylactic antibio-
tics in the prevention of infection
after operative vaginal delivery
(ANODE): a multicentre randomi-
sed controlled trial. Lancet.
2019;393(10189):2395–403.
dc.relation.referencesCurran MJA. Epidural analge-
sia for labor and delivery. Anes-
thesiol Clin North America.
1990;8(1):55–75.
dc.relation.referencesAugusto E, Jes EZC, Bola C,
Palacios OS. fórceps no articu-
lados de. 2019;

dc.relation.referencesVelasco-Chiriboga A. [Espatu-
las para la extraccion fetal un nue-
vo intrumento obstetrico]. Rev
Colomb Obs Ginecol.
1975;26(1):17–32.

dc.relation.referencesDesarrollador G, Materna M.
Tromboembólicos venosos durante
la gestación , el parto o el
puerperio clinical practice guide-
line for the prevention of venous
thromboembolic events during
pregnancy , childbirth or post-
partum period. 2017;68(4):285–
304.
dc.relation.referencesAmerican College of Obste-
tricians and Gynecologists. ACOG
Practice Bulletin: postpartum
hemorrhage. Am Coll Obstet Gy-
necol [Internet].
2017;130(4):168–86. Available
from: http://www1.health.nsw.go-
v.au/pds/ActivePDSDocuments/
%0Ahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/17012482
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez NR. Informe De Even-
to De Morbilidad Materna Ex-
trema, Colombia, Periodo Trece
De 2018. 2018;
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Nacional de Salud.
Mortalidad Materna Colombia
2018. Inf Even [Internet].2018;1(1):1–19. Available from:
https://www.ins.gov.co/buscador-
eventos/Informesdeevento/
MORTALIDAD MATERNA_2018
.pdf
dc.relation.referencesProtocolo SEGO. Hemorragia
postparto precoz. 2006;(609):79–
84.
dc.relation.referencesAmparo L, Angel E, Gait H. La
revisión uterina posparto: ¿factor
de riesgo para infección
puerperal? 1928;(Imi):153–7.

dc.relation.referencesAlvirde Alvaro O, Rodriguez
Anguiniga G. Revision rutinaria
de cavidad uterina en el postparto inmediato. Arch Investig.
2009;1(2):58–63.
dc.relation.referencesCondous GS, Arulkumaran S,
Symonds I, Chapman R, Sinha A,
Razvi K. The “tamponade test” in
the management of massive post-
partum hemorrhage. Obstet Gy-
necol. 2003;101(4):767–72.

dc.relation.referencesSchmid BC, Rezniczek GA, Rolf
N, Saade G, Gebauer G, Maul H.
Uterine packing with chitosan-co-
vered gauze for control of post-
partum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet
Gynecol [Internet].
2013;209(3):225.e1-225.e5. Avai-
lable from: http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.055
dc.relation.referencesSuarez S, Conde-Agudelo A,
Borovac-Pinheiro A, Suarez-Re-
bling D, Eckardt M, Theron G, et
al. Uterine balloon tamponade for
the treatment of postpartum hemo-
rrhage: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gy-
necol [Internet].
2020;222(4):293.e1-293.e52. Avai-
lable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.ajog.2019.11.1287

dc.relation.referencesCollaborative CMQC. Manage
postpartum Bakri A simple solu-
tion for postpartum hemorrhage (
PPH ). Cook Med. 2020;02:4.

dc.relation.referencesSandoval García-Travesí FA,
Hinojosa-Cruz JC, Reyes-Her-
nández MU, Sandoval-Barajas D,
Lorca-Jiménez G, Mendoza-Reyes
E, et al. Tratamiento de la hemo-
rragia posparto con condón hi-
drostático intrauterino. Ginecol
Obstet Mex. 2016;84(4):243–51.
dc.relation.referencesLinde FM, Eliseo J, Carnero B,
Capel A, Nieto A. Ginecología.
2016;
dc.relation.referencesSentilhes L, Resch B, Gromez
A, Clavier E, Ricbourg-Schneider
A, Trichot C, et al. Tratamientos
quirúrgicos y alternativas no mé-
dicas en las hemorragias
posparto. EMC - Ginecol [Inter-
net]. 2011;47(1):1–21. Available
from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S1283-081X(11)70991-2

dc.relation.referencesCunningham Gary Williams.
Obstetricia. 25ª Edición – chapter
41, obstetric hemorrhage
McGraw-Hill 2019.

dc.relation.referencesFerguson JE, Bourgeois FJ,
Underwood PB. B-Lynch suture
for postpartum. Hemorrhage. Obs-
tet Gynecol. 2000;95(6 II Su-
ppl.):1020–2.

dc.relation.referencesGhezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S,
Raio L, Bolis P, Surbek D. TheHayman technique: A simple me-
thod to treat postpartum haemo-
rrhage. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gy-
naecol. 2007;114(3):362–5.
dc.relation.referencesCho JH, Jun HS, Lee CN. He-
mostatic suturing technique for
uterine bleeding during cesarean
delivery. Obstet Gynecol.
2000;96(1):129–31.

dc.relation.referencesEsike COU. A Uterus-Pre-
serving Treatment for Uncontro-
llable Postpartum Hemorrhage.
Obstet Gynecol. 2020;Publish
Ah(3):466–9.

dc.relation.referencesGracias V, Gupta R, Silva JC.
Nonclinical, Observational Trau-
ma Rotations in the United States
provide International Students
Multidisciplinary Trauma Pro-
gram and Systems Education. Pa-
nam J Trauma, Crit Care Emerg
Surg. 2017;6(1):8–12.
dc.relation.referencesAmerican College of Obs-
tetricians and Gynecologists.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142:
Cerclage for the management of
cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gy-
necol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):372–
9. Reaffirmed 2019.

dc.relation.referencesAmerican College of Obs-
tetricians and Gynecologists.
Practice bulletin no. 130: predic-
tion and prevention of preterm
birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oc-
t;120(4):964–73.

dc.relation.referencesEstadisticas vitales EEVV,
2018, Censo y Demografia,
DANE, disponible en http://sys-
tema74.dane.gov.co/bincol/rpwe-
bengine.exe/portal?lang=esp

dc.relation.referencesAlfirevic Z, Stampalija T,
Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerc-
lage) for preventing preterm birth
in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2017;
6:CD008991.

dc.relation.referencesRafael TJ, Berghella V,
Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth
in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews
2014. Issue 9. Art. No.:
CD009166. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD009166
.pub2.
dc.relation.referencesLi C, Shen J, Hua K. Cerc-
lage for women with twin preg-
nancies: a systematic review and
metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gy-
necol 2019; 220:543.

dc.relation.referencesShennan A, Chandiramani
M, Bennett P, et al. MAVRIC: a
multicenter randomized controlled
trial of transabdominal vs transva-
ginal cervical cerclage. Am J Obs-
tet Gynecol 2020; 222:261.e1.

dc.relation.referencesZaveri V, Aghajafari F,
Amankwah K, Hannah M. Abdo-
minal versus vaginal cerclage af-
ter a failed transvaginal cerclage:
a systematic review. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2002; 187:868.

dc.relation.referencesYeomans ER, Hoffman BL,
Gilstrap III LC, Cunningham F. Cunningham and Gilstrap's
Operative Obstetrics, 3er edition,
2017.
dc.relation.referencesBerghella V, Ludmir J, Si-
monazzi G, Owen J. Transvaginal
cervical cerclage: evidence for
perioperative management
strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
september 2013;209(3):181-92.
dc.relation.referencesCommittee on Practice
Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Prac-
tice Bulletin No. 199: Use of Pro-
phylactic Antibiotics in Labor and
Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2018;
132:e103.

dc.relation.referencesEA SJ and D. Tocolytics
used as adjunctive therapy at the
time of cerclage placement: a sys-
tematic review, J Perinatol. 2015
Aug;35(8):561-5.

dc.relation.referencesShirodkar, VN. A new me-
thod of operative treatment for ha-
bitual abortion in the second tri-
mester of pregnancy. Antiseptic
1955; 52:299.
dc.relation.referencesMcDonald IA. Suture of
the cervix for inevitable miscarria-
ge. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp
1957; 64:346.
dc.relation.referencesBerghella V, Rafael TJ, Sz-
ychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J.
Cerclage for short cervix on ultra-
sonography in women with single-
ton gestations and previous pre-
term birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet
Gynecol. 2011;117(3):663-71.

dc.relation.referencesOdibo AO, Berghella V, To
MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM,
Nicolaides KH. Shirodkar versus
McDonald cerclage for the pre-
vention of preterm birth in women
with short cervical length. Am J
Perinatol. enero de
2007;24(1):55-60.
dc.relation.referencesWood SL, Owen J. Cerc-
lage: Shirodkar, McDonald, and Modifications. Clin Obstet Gy-
necol. junio de 2016;59(2):302-
10.
dc.relation.referencesACOG Practice Bulletin
No. 195. Prevention of Infection
After Gynecologic Procedures
(2018). Obstetrics & Gynecology,
131(6), e172–e189.
dc.relation.referencesDawood F, Farquharson
RG. Transabdominal cerclage:
preconceptual versus first trimes-
ter insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol 2016; 199:27.
dc.relation.referencesTulandi T, Alghanaim N,
Hakeem G, Tan X. Pre and post-
conceptional abdominal cerclage
by laparoscopy or laparotomy. J
Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;
21:987.
dc.relation.referencesBrown R, Gagnon R, De-
lisle M-F. No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage. J
Obstet Gynaecol Can. febrero de
2019;41(2):233-47.
dc.relation.referencesHamilton BE, Martin JA,
Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Mat-
thews TJ. Births: final data for
2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep.
2015;64(12):1–64.
dc.relation.referencesHamilton BE, Martin JA,
Osterman MJ. Births: preliminary
data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep.
2016;65(3):1–15.
dc.relation.referencesRobert R, Charles JL, Creasy
and Resnik´s Maternal-Fetal
Medicine: Principles and practice,
Eighth edition, Elsevier, 2019
dc.relation.referencesAmerican College of Obste-
tricians and Gynecologists’ Com-
mittee on Practice Bulletins—Obs-
tetrics, Committee on Genetics,
Society for Maternal–Fetal
Medicine. Practice Bulletin No.
162: Prenatal Diagnostic Testing
for Genetic Disorders. Obstet Gy-
necol. 2016;127(5):e108-122.

dc.relation.referencesAntibiotic Prophylaxis Before
Second-Trimester Genetic Amnio-
centesis (APGA): A Single-Centre
Open Randomised Controlled
Trial, Prenat Diagn,
Jun;29(6):606-12.
dc.relation.referencesGramellini D, Fieni S, Casilla
G, Raboni S, Nardelli GB. Mid-tri-
mester amniocentesis and antibio-
tic prophylaxis. Prenat Diagn. oct
2007;27(10):956-9.
dc.relation.referencesMujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z.
Analgesia for amniocentesis or
chorionic villus sampling. Cochra-
ne Database Syst Rev. 9 de no-
viembre de 2011;(11):CD008580.
dc.relation.referencesAthanasiadis AP, Pantazis K,
Goulis DG, Chatzigeorgiou K, Vaitsi V, Assimakopoulos E, et al.
Comparison between 20G and
22G needle for second trimester
amniocentesis in terms of tech-
nical aspects and short-term
complications. Prenat Diagn.
agosto de 2009;29(8):761-5.
dc.relation.referencesYeomans ER, Hoffman BL, Gils-
trap III LC, Cunningham F. Cun-
ningham and Gilstrap's Operative
Obstetrics, 3er edition, 2017.
dc.relation.referencesKong CW, Leung TN, Leung TY,
Chan LW, Sahota DS, Fung TY, et
al. Risk factors for procedure-re-
lated fetal losses after mid-trimes-
ter genetic amniocentesis. Prenat
Diagn. octubre de
2006;26(10):925-30.
dc.relation.referencesCommittee on Practice Bulle-
tins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin
No. 181: Prevention of Rh D Alloi-
mmunization. Obstet Gynecol.
2017;130(2):e57-70.
dc.relation.referencesMujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Te-
chnique modifications for reducing
the risks from amniocentesis or
chorionic villus sampling. Cochra-
ne Database Syst Rev. 15 de agosto
de 2012;(8):CD008678.
dc.relation.referencesTabor A, Philip J, Madsen M,
Bang J, Obel EB, Nørgaard-
Pedersen B. Randomised contro-
lled trial of genetic amniocentesis
in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet. 7
de junio de 1986;1(8493):1287-
93.
dc.relation.referencesGold RB, Goyert GL, Schwartz
DB, Evans MI, Seabolt LA. Con-
servative management of second-
trimester post-amniocentesis fluid
leakage. Obstet Gynecol. no-
viembre de 1989;74(5):745-7.
dc.relation.referencesBorgida AF, Mills AA, Feld-
man DM, Rodis JF, Egan JF. Ou-
tcome of pregnancies complicated
by ruptured membranes after ge-
netic amniocentesis. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. octubre de
2000;183(4):937-9.
dc.relation.referencesSeeds JW. Diagnostic mid tri-
mester amniocentesis: how safe?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. agosto de
2004;191(2):607-15.
dc.relation.referencesCederholm M, Haglund B,
Axelsson O. Infant morbidity follo-
wing amniocentesis and chorionic
villus sampling for prenatal karyo-
typing. BJOG. abril de
2005;112(4):394-402.
dc.relation.referencesBaird PA, Yee IM, Sadovnick
AD. Population-based study of
long-term outcomes after amnio-
centesis. Lancet. 22 de octubre de
1994;344(8930):1134-6.
dc.relation.referencesSalomon LJ, Sotiriadis A, Wulff
CB, Odibo A, Akolekar R. Risk of
miscarriage following amniocen-
tesis or chorionic villus sampling:
systematic review of literature and
updated meta-analysis. Ultra-
sound Obstet Gynecol. octubre de
2019;54(4):442-51.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalObstetricia
dc.subject.proposalObstetrics
dc.subject.proposalSurgery
dc.subject.proposalQuirúrgico
dc.subject.proposalParto
dc.subject.proposalBirth
dc.subject.proposalPostpartum hemorrhage
dc.subject.proposalHemorragia posparto
dc.subject.proposalParto obstétrico
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Libro - Procedimientos en ...
Tamaño:
38.15Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descargar
Thumbnail
Nombre:
license_rdf
Tamaño:
811bytes
Formato:
application/rdf+xml
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito