Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Mal estructurando problemas de diseño: oportunidades en las ideas ignoradas

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorAcero Roso, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorPinzón Villafrades, Pedro Francisco
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T20:48:23Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T20:48:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-21
dc.identifier.citationPinzón Villafrades, P. F. (2020). Mal estructurando problemas de diseño: oportunidades en las ideas ignoradas [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79195
dc.description.abstractMediante la variación de la estructura de los problemas de diseño es posible impactar en la calidad de la exploración del espacio de la solución del problema de diseño. Este trabajo de investigación propone la mal estructuración de los problemas de diseño como un herramienta para encontrar oportunidades de solución en ideas que pueden descartarse de manera inconsciente. Este trabajo de investigación se adentra en el diseño como una de las industrias creativas y plantea como los diseñadores pueden mejorar su eficiencia en los procesos de diseño, al aumentar el numero de ideas de soluciones que proponen. Para realizar esta investigación se trabaja con una agencia de diseño en la ciudad de Bogotá que cuenta con una población con diferentes niveles de experiencia profesional, edades y capacidades en el procesos de diseño. Para explicar la mal estructuración de los problemas de diseño como herramienta efectiva para la mejora del proceso de diseño, esta investigación ofrece herramientas de caracterización de los procesos de ideación realizados por diseñadores, así como herramientas para impactar en la estructura de los problemas de diseño al variar el nivel de incertidumbre al que se enfrenta un diseñador durante el desarrollo del ejercicio de diseño. Esta investigación a través del diseño da un aporte al aspecto cognitivo del diseño al proponer métodos para trabajar en la fase de ideación del pensamiento de diseño.
dc.description.abstractBy changing the structure of design problems, it is possible to impact the quality in the exploration of design solution space. This research proposes ill structuring design problems as a tool to find solution opportunities in ideas that can be discarded unconsciously. This research shows design as a one of the creative industries and raises how designers can improve their efficiency in design processes, by increasing the number of ideas they propose. To carry out this research, we work with a design agency in the city of Bogotá that has a population with different levels of professional experience, ages and abilities in the design process. To explain the ill structuring of design problems as an effective tool for improving the design process, this research offers characterization tools for the ideation processes carried out by designers, as well as tools to impact the structure of design problems by changing the level of uncertainty a designer faces during the development of his design exercise. This research through design contributes to the cognitive aspect of design by proposing methods to work in the ideation phase of design thinking.
dc.format.extent205
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc700 - Las artes, bellas artes y artes decorativas
dc.titleMal estructurando problemas de diseño: oportunidades en las ideas ignoradas
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.description.additionalLínea de investigación: Cognición y pensamiento de diseño.
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Artes - Maestría en Diseño
dc.contributor.researchgroupPedagogía del Diseño
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAcero, A. (2016). Aproximaciones críticas (desde la pedagogía) para una enseñanza del diseño. En H. A. Mesa (Ed.), Coloquios del diseño: Disciplina, pedagogía, profesión (pp. 14-29). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesAish, R. (2005). From intuition to precision.
dc.relation.referencesAltshuller, G. S. (1984). Creativity as an exact science: the theory of the solution of inventive problems. Gordon and Breach.
dc.relation.referencesBala, S. (2014). Lateral thinking vs vertical thinking. Deliberative Research, 24(1), 25.
dc.relation.referencesBeitz, W., Pahl, G., & Grote, K. (1996). Engineering design: a systematic approach. MRS BULLETIN, 71.
dc.relation.referencesBenesty, J., Chen, J., Huang, Y., & Cohen, I. (2009). Pearson correlation coefficient. In Noise reduction in speech processing (pp. 1-4). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
dc.relation.referencesBeyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997). Contextual design: A customer-centered approach to systems designs.
dc.relation.referencesBilalić, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2008). Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition, 108(3), 652-661.
dc.relation.referencesBjörklund, T. A. (2013). Initial mental representations of design problems: Differences between experts and novices. Design Studies, 34(2), 135-160.
dc.relation.referencesBratteteig, T., Rolstad, O. K., & Wagner, I. (2016). The life and death of design ideas. In COOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 23-27 May 2016, Trento, Italy (pp. 259-275). Springer, Cham.
dc.relation.referencesBriede-Westermeyer, J. C., & Pérez-Villalobos, C. (2017). Diseño industrial, creatividad e ideación: Estudio sobre el desarrollo de productos en la industria manufacturera del Biobío, Chile. Interciencia, 42(5), 293-300.
dc.relation.referencesBriggs, R. O., & Reinig, B. A. (2010). Bounded ideation theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 123-144.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), 84.
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5-21.
dc.relation.referencesBuitrago, F & Duque, I. (2013). La Economía Naranja: una oportunidad infinita. Bogotá: Puntoaparte Bookvertising para el Banco Interamericano del Desarrollo (BID).
dc.relation.referencesClaxton, G. (2000). The anatomy of intuition. The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing.
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design studies, 25(5), 427-441.
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berg.
dc.relation.referencesDacey, J. S. (1989). Fundamentals of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: lexington Books.
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2020, 24 julio). Cuenta Satélite de Cultura y Economía Naranja (CSCEN) 2014-2019pr. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/cuentas-nacionales/cuentas-satelite/cuenta-satelite-de-cultura-en-colombia/cuenta-satelite-de-cultura-y-economia-naranja-cscen-2014-2019pr
dc.relation.referencesDe Bono, E., & Diéguez, R. D. (1988). Seis sombreros para pensar. Granica.
dc.relation.referencesDe Kohan, N. C. (2008). Los sesgos cognitivos en la toma de decisiones. International Journal Of Psychological Research, 1(1), 68–73.
dc.relation.referencesDesign Council. (2019, 10 septiembre). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council’s evolved Double Diamond. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond
dc.relation.referencesDiethelm, J. (2019). Embodied design thinking. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(1), 44-54.
dc.relation.referencesDinero. (2018, 9 julio). Así se mueve la publicidad en Colombia. Así se mueve la publicidad en Colombia, por Raúl Ávila. https://www.dinero.com/opinion/columnistas/articulo/asi-se-mueve-la-publicidad-en-colombia-por-raul-avila/259956
dc.relation.referencesDix, A., Ormerod, T., Twidale, M., Sas, C., Silva, P. A., & McKnight, L. (2006). Why bad ideas are a good idea.
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2003). Exploring the structure of design problems. In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm.
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2004). On the problem of design problems-problem solving and design expertise. Journal of design research, 4(2), 185-196.
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design issues, 22(3), 4-17.
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design studies, 22(5), 425-437.
dc.relation.referencesDurling, D. (1999). Intuition in Design: A perspective on designers' creativity. In Bulletin of 4th Asian Design Conference International Symposium on Design Science.
dc.relation.referencesDziobczenski, P. R. N., & Person, O. (2017). Graphic designer wanted: A document analysis of the described skill set of graphic designers in job advertisements from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Design, 11(2).
dc.relation.referencesEspinel, M. C., Bruno, A., & Plasencia, I. (2010). La comprensión de gráficas de porcentaje de variación en situaciones cotidianas. Revista Iberoamericana de educación Matemática, 1(24), 83-102.
dc.relation.referencesFarrell, R., & Hooker, C. (2013). Design, science and wicked problems. Design studies, 34(6), 681-705.
dc.relation.referencesFoster, J., & Corby, L. (2007). How to get ideas. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesFrog. (2014, 26 junio). Global Design and Innovation Consulting Firm. frog design. https://www.frogdesign.com/
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, F. M. G. (1992). Los mapas conceptuales de JD Novak como instrumentos para la investigación en didáctica de las ciencias experimentales. Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, 148-158.
dc.relation.referencesGilhooly, K. J. (1989). Human and Machine Problem Solving Toward a Comparative Cognitive Science. In Human and machine problem solving (pp. 1-12). Springer, Boston, MA.
dc.relation.referencesGirotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management science, 56(4), 591-605.
dc.relation.referencesGoel, V. (2014). Creative brains: designing in the real world. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 241.
dc.relation.referencesGoel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive science, 16(3), 395-429.
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2014). What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design studies, 35(1), 29-53.
dc.relation.referencesGrammenos, Dimitris, and Margherita Antona. "Future designers: Introducing creativity, design thinking & design to children." International journal of child-computer interaction 16 (2018): 16-24.
dc.relation.referencesHead, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
dc.relation.referencesHead, B., & Alford, J. (2008). Wicked problems: Implications for policy and management. In Australian Political Studies Association Conference.
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R., & Torres, C. P. M. (2018). Metodología de la investigación (Vol. 4). México^ eD. F DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
dc.relation.referencesHernandis, B., & Cabello, M. (2006). Creatividad, Innovación y desarrollo de Nuevos Productos.
dc.relation.referencesHlavacek, I., Chleboun, J., & Babuska, I. (2004). Uncertain input data problems and the worst scenario method. Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesHofer, E., Kloos, M., Krzykacz-Hausmann, B., Peschke, J., & Woltereck, M. (2002). An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 77(3), 229-238.
dc.relation.referencesHofstadter, D. R. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, 499-538.
dc.relation.referencesHoppe, R. (2018). Heuristics for practitioners of policy design: Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems. Public policy and administration, 33(4), 384-408.
dc.relation.referencesHoward, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design studies, 29(2), 160-180.
dc.relation.referencesHuera, V. L. N., Balseca, J. O., & Tigselema, I. L. P. (2016). Diseño gráfico para fortalecer la cultura organizacional. SATHIRI, (11), 86-95.
dc.relation.referencesHugentobler, H. K., Jonas, W., & Rahe, D. (2004, November). Designing a methods platform for design and design research. In Futureground, Design Research Society, International Conference, Monash University, Australia.
dc.relation.referencesIDEO. (2013). Design Thinking for Educators: Toolkit (2.a ed.). IDEO.
dc.relation.referencesJansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design studies, 12(1), 3-11.
dc.relation.referencesJohansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and innovation management, 22(2), 121-146.
dc.relation.referencesJuan, B. M. (2018). El director de arte en la configuración de los equipos creativos: proceso creativo y acceso a las agencias de publicidad. grafica, 6(11), 13-24.
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesKale, U., & Akcaoglu, M. (2020). Problem Solving and Teaching How to Solve Problems in Technology-Rich Contexts. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(2), 127-138.
dc.relation.referencesKoshik, I. (2003). Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 51-77.
dc.relation.referencesKrippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. ARTIFACT-ROUTLEDGE-, 1(11), 51.
dc.relation.referencesLawson, B. R. (1979). Cognitive strategies in architectural design. Ergonomics, 22(1), 59-68.
dc.relation.referencesLiao, Y., Yang, C., & Li, W. (2015). Extension innovation design of product family based on Kano requirement model. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 268-277.
dc.relation.referencesLindberg, T., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2010). Evolving discourses on design thinking: how design cognition inspires meta-disciplinary creative collaboration. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 8(1).
dc.relation.referencesLindemann, U. (2009). Methodical development of technical products. Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte. Berlin: Springer.
dc.relation.referencesLuchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological monographs, 54(6), i.
dc.relation.referencesMaher, M. L., Poon, J., & Boulanger, S. (1996). Formalising design exploration as co-evolution. In Advances in formal design methods for CAD (pp. 3-30). Springer, Boston, MA.
dc.relation.referencesMayer, R. E. (1989). Human nonadversary problem solving. In Human and machine problem solving (pp. 39-56). Springer, Boston, MA.
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, D. P., Yang, M. C., Hernández, A. A., Linsey, J. S., & Wood, K. L. (2015). A step beyond to overcome design fixation: a design-by-analogy approach. In Design computing and Cognition'14 (pp. 607-624). Springer, Cham.
dc.relation.referencesNelson, B. A., Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., & Yen, J. (2009). Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 30(6), 737-743.
dc.relation.referencesNovak, J. D. (1998). Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mahvah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.relation.referencesOzkan, O., & Dogan, F. (2013). Cognitive strategies of analogical reasoning in design: Differences between expert and novice designers. Design Studies, 34(2), 161-192.
dc.relation.referencesPeeters, J., Verhaegen, P. A., Vandevenne, D., & Duflou, J. R. (2010). Refined metrics for measuring novelty in ideation. IDMME Virtual Concept Research in Interaction Design, Oct, 20-22.
dc.relation.referencesPiaget, J. (1981). La teoría de Piaget. Infancia y aprendizaje, 4(sup2), 13-54.
dc.relation.referencesPons, D. (2004). Design for uncertainty. Conference: Design Research Society International Conference, 'Futureground'. Melbourne.
dc.relation.referencesRazzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research, 82(3), 330-348.
dc.relation.referencesReitman, W. R. (1964). Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the structure of ill-defined problems. Human judgments and optimality, 282-315.
dc.relation.referencesRíos, A. (2018, 1 junio). Registre su compañía en el Ranking de las 300 empresas de la comunicación. Revista PyM. https://revistapym.com.co/comunicacion/ranking-de-la-comunicacion-publicitaria
dc.relation.referencesRittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
dc.relation.referencesRoozenburg, N. F., & Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: fundamentals and methods.
dc.relation.referencesSchön, D.A., & V. DeSanctis. (1986). “The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education29–30. doi: 10.1080/07377366.1986.10401080.
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well‐defined and ill‐defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(6), 523-538.
dc.relation.referencesShah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design studies, 24(2), 111-134.
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial intelligence, 4(3-4), 181-201.
dc.relation.referencesSloan, M. C. (2010). Aristotle’s nicomachean ethics as the original locus for the septem circumstantiae. Classical Philology, 105(3), 236-251.
dc.relation.referencesSuoheimo, M. (2020). Strategies and Visual Tools to Resolve Wicked Problems - University of Lapland research portal. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 13(2), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v13i02/25-41
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, R. N. (1974). Nature of problem ill‐structuredness: Implications for problem formulation and solution. Decision Sciences, 5(4), 632-643.
dc.relation.referencesTepper, S. J. (2002). Creative assets and the changing economy. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 32(2), 159-168.
dc.relation.referencesToro, W. O. (2016). Componentes in-textuales del diseño: Naturaleza del diseño vs. naturaleza de la pedagogía del diseño. En H. A. Mesa (Ed.), Coloquios del diseño: Disciplina, pedagogía, profesión (pp. 14-29). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesTorrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking– Norms: Technical Manual Research Edition—Verbal Tests, Forms A and B— Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2017) Industrias creativas | Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. http://www.unesco.org/. Recuperado 5 de agosto de 2020, de http://www.unesco.org/new/es/culture/themes/creativity/creative-industries/
dc.relation.referencesVerhaegen, P. A., Vandevenne, D., Peeters, J., & Duflou, J. R. (2013). Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation. Design Studies, 34(2), 243-263.
dc.relation.referencesVisser, W. (2006). Designing as construction of representations: A dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research. Human–Computer Interaction, 21(1), 103-152.
dc.relation.referencesWallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., & Ruzek, E. (2016). What can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the tripod student perception survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834-1868.
dc.relation.referencesWallerstein, I. (1998). Uncertainty and creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 320-322.
dc.relation.referencesWard, T. B., Patterson, M. J., & Sifonis, C. M. (2004). The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 1-9.
dc.relation.referencesWehmeier, S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary: Of Current English. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesYilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2016). Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation. Design Studies, 46, 95-124.
dc.relation.referencesYilmaz, S., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2010). Cognitive heuristics in design: Instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AI EDAM, 24(3), 335.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalPensamiento de diseño
dc.subject.proposalDesign thinking
dc.subject.proposalProblemas mal estructurados
dc.subject.proposalIll structured problems
dc.subject.proposalIdeación
dc.subject.proposalIdeation
dc.subject.proposalCreativity
dc.subject.proposalCreatividad
dc.subject.proposalProblemas de diseño
dc.subject.proposalDesign problems
dc.subject.proposalProblem space
dc.subject.proposalEspacio del problema
dc.subject.proposalSolution space
dc.subject.proposalEspacio de la solución
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
license_rdf
Tamaño:
701bytes
Formato:
application/rdf+xml
Descargar
Thumbnail
Nombre:
1032374954.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
4.586Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descargar
Thumbnail
Nombre:
1032374954.2020.Anexo A.pdf
Tamaño:
4.145Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descargar
Thumbnail
Nombre:
1032374954.2020.Anexo B.pdf
Tamaño:
1.343Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito