Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorZamora Abrego, Joan Gastón
dc.contributor.advisorSolari Torres, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Arias, Víctor Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-26T15:21:48Z
dc.date.available2021-02-26T15:21:48Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-17
dc.identifier.citationMartínez-Arias, V.M. 2018. AREAS NATURALES PROTEGIDAS, ÁREAS PRIORITARIAS Y DIVERSIDAD DE MURCIÉLAGOS EN EL CARIBE COLOMBIANO. esis o trabajo de investigación presentada(o) como requisito parcial para optar al título de: Mágister en Bosques y Conservación Ambiental. Asesores: Zamora-Abrego, J.G., Solari, Sergio. Facultad de ciencias agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79314
dc.description.abstractLos estudios de los patrones de biodiversidad pueden permitir identificar cómo la distribución espacial de los taxa es influenciada por factores ecológicos, biogeográficos, evolutivos e incluso relacionados con la intervención humana. Así, el abordaje de los patrones espaciales expresados en un territorio se consolida como un conocimiento relevante a la hora de efectuar el planteamiento sistemático de planes de manejo y conservación, a diferentes niveles taxonómicos. Precisamente, el uso de métodos estadísticos espaciales puede ser de gran utilidad a la hora de identificar la distribución de la riqueza de especies en un territorio y los patrones de variación que ésta expresa. Bajo este precepto, en el presente trabajo se aborda el planeamiento de la conservación desde el análisis de la muestra, pasando por el estudio de las distribuciones espaciales y su dependencia en términos de método y escala, hasta la identificación de áreas prioritarias para la conservación. Empleando estos métodos se logra el cálculo de la riqueza de especies en un territorio, la identificación de zonas de importancia para la conservación de murciélagos en el Caribe Colombiano, y la identificación de áreas prioritarias. Los resultados concuerdan con la hipótesis clásica de distritos biogeográficos para la región y su influencia en los patrones de distribución de las especies por encima de ecorregiones o ecosistemas a una escala continental, identificándose también una relación con los eventos climáticos ocurridos en el pleistoceno, como los determinantes de la distribución actual de especies de murciélagos.
dc.description.abstractSpatial analysis of biodiversity patterns can lead to the understanding of how taxa spatial distributions, are influenced by ecological, biogeographic, evolutive, or even human-related circumstances. This kind (spatial) of information is also valuable while systematic conservation exercises are carried out, and especially when the identification of distribution patterns is tied to questions regarding its origins and historical contexts. In the present research, from georeferenced registers we studied species richness and phylogenetic diversity distribution of the Colombian Caribbean lowlands bats, using spatial statistics methods (IDW, Kriging) and the analyses of several structural arrangements related to ecoregions, biogeographical districts, and Berhmann’s grids. Our results show relevant diversity hotspots around some important geographic units with a high variety of ecosystems as the Sierra Nevada, Montes de Maria, and Paramillo National Park. The founded patterns exhibit a strong geographic component, associated with the classical hypothesis of the biogeographical districts in Colombia. Furthermore, some climatic events that occurred during the Pleistocene, seem to have been influenced the actual richness distribution alongside the studied territory. Finally, using our results, we suggest some relevant areas for conservation prioritization alongside a highly intervened region.
dc.description.sponsorshipCorporación Merceditas
dc.format.extent107
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc550 - Ciencias de la tierra
dc.subject.ddc590 - Animales::599 - Mamíferos
dc.titleÁreas naturales protegidas, áreas prioritarias y diversidad de murciélagos en el Caribe colombiano
dc.title.alternativeNatural protected areas, priority areas and diversity of bats in the colombian Caribbean region
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Ciencias Agrarias - Maestría en Bosques y Conservación Ambiental
dc.contributor.researchgroupEcología y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ciencias Forestales
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relation.referencesAgnarsson, I., C. M. Zambrana-Torrelio, N. P. Flores-Saldana, & L. J. May-Collado. 2011. A time-calibrated species-level phylogeny of bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia). PLoS Curr 3: RRN1212.
dc.relation.referencesAlberico, M., & V. Rojas-Díaz. 2002. Mamíferos de Colombia. Pp. 185-226. in Gerardo Ceballos & Javier A. Simonetti (eds). Diversidad y conservación de los mamíferos neotropicales.
dc.relation.referencesAragó, P., P. Juan, D. Varga, & M. Saez. 2017. Filtering Volunteered Geospatial information (VGI) using Spatial Point Pattern. Birds observer’s credibility. Available at https://figshare.com/articles/poster/Filtering_Volunteered_Geospatial_information_VGI_using_Spatial_Point_Pattern_Birds_observer_s_credibility/4807159 [Accessed 22 July 2017].
dc.relation.referencesArita, H. T., & P. Rodriguez. 2002. Geographic range, turnover rate and the scaling of species diversity. Ecography 25: 541–550.
dc.relation.referencesBaddeley, A. 2018. spatstat. local: Extension to’spatstat’for local composite likelihood. URL https://CRAN. R project. org/package= spatstat. local, r package version: 3–5.
dc.relation.referencesBaddeley, A., E. Rubak, & R. Turner. 2015. Spatial point patterns: methodology and applications with R. CRC press.
dc.relation.referencesBaird, A. B., J. K. Braun, M. A. Mares, J. C. Morales, J. C. Patton, C. Q. Tran, & J. W. Bickham. 2015. Molecular systematic revision of tree bats (Lasiurini): doubling the native mammals of the Hawaiian Islands. Journal of Mammalogy 96: 1255–1274.
dc.relation.referencesBaird, A. B., D. M. Hillis, J. C. Patton, & J. W. Bickham. 2008. Evolutionary history of the genus Rhogeessa (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) as revealed by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Journal of Mammalogy 89: 744–754.
dc.relation.referencesBartlett, S. N., M. M. McDonough, & L. K. Ammerman. 2013. Molecular systematics of bonneted bats (Molossidae: Eumops) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Journal of Mammalogy 94: 867–880.
dc.relation.referencesBininda-emonds, O. R. P. 2004. The evolution of supertrees. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19(6):315-22
dc.relation.referencesBirkhofer, K., S. Scheu, & D. H. Wise. 2007. Small-Scale Spatial Pattern of Web-Building Spiders (Araneae) in Alfalfa: Relationship to Disturbance from Cutting, Prey Availability, and Intraguild Interactions. Environ Entomol 36: 801–810.
dc.relation.referencesBivand, R. Keitt, T., and B. Rowlingson. rgdal: Bindings for the ’Geospatial’ Data Abstraction Library, 2018. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal. R package version 1.2-15. [p439]
dc.relation.referencesBivand, R. S., E. Pebesma, & V. Gómez-Rubio. 2013. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York. Available at https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781461476177.
dc.relation.referencesBlackburn, T. M., & K. J. Gaston. 1996. The distribution of bird species in the New World: patterns in species turnover. Oikos: 146–152.
dc.relation.referencesBuckley, L. B., & W. Jetz. 2008. Linking global turnover of species and environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 17836–17841.
dc.relation.referencesBurkmar. 2017. FSC Plugin for QGIS. Field Studies Council, Present Montford, Shropshire, UK. Available at https://www.fscbiodiversity.uk/qgisplugin.
dc.relation.referencesBush, A., V. Hermoso, S. Linke, D. Nipperess, E. Turak, & L. Hughes. 2014. Freshwater conservation planning under climate change: demonstrating proactive approaches for Australian Odonata. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 1273–1281.
dc.relation.referencesCadotte, M. W., K. Carscadden, & N. Mirotchnick. 2011. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of applied ecology 48: 1079–1087.
dc.relation.referencesCalderón, C. 2012. Descripción del ensamblaje de murciélagos en un bosque seco tropical en la Reserva Natural Sanguaré (San Onofre, Sucre). Tesis para optar el título de Biólogo, Universidad de Antioquia Medellín.
dc.relation.referencesCalonge, B., I. Vela Vargas, & J. Pérez Torres. 2010. Murciélagos asociados a una finca ganadera en Córdoba (Colombia). Revista MVZ Córdoba 15. Available at https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/331.
dc.relation.referencesCamacho, M. A., D. Chavez, & S. F. Burneo. 2016. A taxonomic revision of the Yasuni Round-eared bat, Lophostoma yasuni (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Zootaxa 4114: 246–260
dc.relation.referencesCeballos, G., & P. R. Ehrlich. 2006. Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 19374–19379.
dc.relation.referencesChacón Pacheco, J., J. Racero-Casarrubia, & J. Correa. 2018. New records of Pteronotus parnellii (Chiroptera, Mormoopidae) in the department of Cordoba, Colombia. Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Historia Natural 22.
dc.relation.referencesCORPOGUAJIRA. 2011. Atlas Ambiental del departamento de la Guajira | Corpoguajira. Available at http://corpoguajira.gov.co/wp/atlas-ambiental-del-departamento-de-la-guajira/ [Accessed 22 July 2017].
dc.relation.referencesCortés-Delgado, N., & L. J. Ferbans. 2014. Descripción de un refugio usado por Phyllostomus hastatus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) en la Serranía del Perijá, La Guajira, Colombia. Revista Ciencia e Ingeniería 1: 2389–9484.
dc.relation.referencesCousins, S. A., & O. Eriksson. 2002. The influence of management history and habitat on plant species richness in a rural hemiboreal landscape, Sweden. Landscape ecology 17: 517–529.
dc.relation.referencesCruz Rot, M. de la. 2006. Introducción al análisis de datos mapeados o algunas de las (muchas) cosas que puedo hacer si tengo coordenadas. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10045/7701.
dc.relation.referencesCruz-Rodríguez, C. A., J. Pérez-Torres, & J. F. González-Maya. 2017. Resolución nacional de especies amenazadas de Colombia. Mammalogy Notes 4: 1–5.
dc.relation.referencesDesmet, P. G., R. M. Cowling, A. G. Ellis, & R. L. Pressey. 2002. Integrating biosystematic data into conservation planning: perspectives from southern Africa’s Succulent Karoo. Systematic Biology 51: 317–330.
dc.relation.referencesEchavarría-R, J. D., Y. L. Pino-M, J. T. Rengifo-M, N. Sánchez-L, & J. Quinto-M. 2017. Reporte del vampiro de patas peludas Diphylla ecaudata Spix, 1823 (Chiroptera: Desmodontinae) para el Chocó biogeográfico colombiano. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA: 198–202.
dc.relation.referencesEguiarte, L. E., J. Larson-Guerra, J. Nuñez-Farfán, A. Martínez-Palacios, K. S. Del Prado, & H. T. Arita. 1999. Diversidad filogenética y conservación: ejemplos a diferentes escalas y una propuesta a nivel poblacional para Agave victoriae-reginae en el desierto de Chihuahua, México. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 72: 475–492.
dc.relation.referencesESRI. 2011. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute., Redlands, CA.
dc.relation.referencesFaith, D. P. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological conservation 61: 1–10.
dc.relation.referencesFajardo, J., J. Lessmann, E. Bonaccorso, C. Devenish, & J. Muñoz. 2014. Combined use of systematic conservation planning, species distribution modelling, and connectivity analysis reveals severe conservation gaps in a megadiverse country (Peru). PLoS One 9: e114367.
dc.relation.referencesFalling Rain Software Ltd. 2018. Global Gazetteer Version 2.3 Directory of Cities and Towns in World. Available at http://www.fallingrain.com/world/index.html [Accessed 5 May 2018].
dc.relation.referencesFritz, S. A., & C. Rahbek. 2012. Global patterns of amphibian phylogenetic diversity. Journal of biogeography 39: 1373–1382.
dc.relation.referencesGalván-Guevara, S., & I. Sierra. 2009. Biodiversidad en el área de influencia de la estación primates de colosó, sucre, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA: 98–121.
dc.relation.referencesGardner, A. L. 2008. Mammals of South America, Volume 1. University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesGaston, K. J., K. Evans, & J. Lennon. 2007. The scaling of spatial turnover: pruning the thicket. In ‘Scaling Biodiversity’.(Eds D. Storch, PM Marquet and JH Brown.) pp. 181–222. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
dc.relation.referencesGomes, V. H., S. D. IJff, N. Raes, I. L. Amaral, R. P. Salomão, L. de Souza Coelho, F. D. de Almeida Matos, C. V. Castilho, D. de Andrade Lima Filho, & D. C. López. 2018. Species Distribution Modelling: Contrasting presence-only models with plot abundance data. Scientific reports 8: 1–12.
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Maya, J. F., E. Martínez-Meyer, R. Medellín, & G. Ceballos. 2017. Distribution of mammal functional diversity in the Neotropical realm: Influence of land-use and extinction risk. PloS one 12: e0175931.
dc.relation.referencesGordon, A. D. 1986. Consensus supertrees: the synthesis of rooted trees containing overlapping sets of labeled leaves. Journal of classification 3: 335–348.
dc.relation.referencesGranger, V., N. Bez, J.-M. Fromentin, C. Meynard, A. Jadaud, & B. Merigot. 2015. Mapping diversity indices: not a trivial issue. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 688–696.
dc.relation.referencesHalffter, G. 2005. Towards a culture of biodiversity conservation. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 21: 133–153.
dc.relation.referencesvan der Hammen, T. 1974. The Pleistocene changes of vegetation and climate in tropical South America. Journal of Biogeography: 3–26.
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Camacho, J., Hurtado-Guerra, A., Ortiz-Quijano, R., & Walschburger, T. 1992. Unidades biogeográficas de Colombia. Pp. 105–152 in Halffter, G. (ed). La Diversidad Biológica de Iberoamérica I: Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo. Instituto de Ecología A.C. Acta Zoológica Mexicana. México.
dc.relation.referencesHijmans, R., & van Etten, Jacob. 2012. raster: Geographic analysis and modeling with raster data. R package version 2.0-12. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster
dc.relation.referencesHillebrand, H., B. Blasius, E. T. Borer, J. M. Chase, J. A. Downing, B. K. Eriksson, C. T. Filstrup, W. S. Harpole, D. Hodapp, & S. Larsen. 2018. Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: Consequences for conservation and monitoring. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 169–184.
dc.relation.referencesHilty, S. L., W. L. Brown, & B. Brown. 1986. A guide to the birds of Colombia. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHoffmann, F. G., & R. J. Baker. 2003. Comparative phylogeography of short-tailed bats (Carollia:Phyllostomidae). Molecular Ecology 12: 3403–3414.
dc.relation.referencesHolt, R. D., & T. H. Keitt. 2005. Species’ borders: a unifying theme in ecology. Oikos 108: 3–6.
dc.relation.referencesIDEAM. 2012. Metodología para la zonificación de susceptibilidad general del terreno a los movimientos en masa. Instituto de Hidrología, Metereología y Estudios Ambientales, Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi - IGAC. 2011. Geografía de Colombia. Subdirección de Geografía y Cartografía. IGAC. Subdirección de Geografía y Cartografía. Bogotá. Imprenta nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesJones, O., Kate E. ;. Purvis, Andy; MacLarnon, Ann; Bininda-Emonds, & N. Simmons. 2002. A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia:Chiroptera). Biological Reviews 77: 223–259.
dc.relation.referencesKembel, S. W., P. D. Cowan, M. R. Helmus, W. K. Cornwell, H. Morlon, D. D. Ackerly, S. P. Blomberg, & C. O. Webb. 2010. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26: 1463–1464.
dc.relation.referencesKoleff, P., & K. J. Gaston. 2002. The relationships between local and regional species richness and spatial turnover. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11: 363–375.
dc.relation.referencesKoleff, P., J. Soberón, H. T. Arita, P. Dávila, O. Flores-Villela, J. Golubov, G. Halffter, A. Lira-Noriega, C. E. Moreno, & E. Moreno. 2008. Patrones de diversidad espacial en grupos selectos de especies. Capital natural de México 1: 323–364.
dc.relation.referencesLarsen, R. J., P. A. Larsen, H. H. Genoways, F. M. Catzeflis, K. Geluso, G. G. Kwiecinski, S. C. Pedersen, F. Simal, & R. J. Baker. 2012. Evolutionary history of Caribbean species of Myotis, with evidence of a third Lesser Antillean endemic. Mammalian Biology 77: 124–134.
dc.relation.referencesLee Jr, T. E., S. R. Hoofer, & R. A. Van Den Bussche. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic revision of the genus Tonatia (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Journal of Mammalogy 83: 49–57.
dc.relation.referencesLim, B. K., M. D. Engstrom, F. a. Reid, N. B. Simmons, R. S. Voss, & D. W. Fleck. 2010. A New Species of Peropteryx (Chiroptera: Emballonuridae) from Western Amazonia with Comments on Phylogenetic Relationships within the Genus. American Museum Novitates 3686: 1–20.
dc.relation.referencesList, I. R. 2016. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2016.1.
dc.relation.referencesLong, J. A. 2015. Quantifying Spatial-temporal Interactions from Wildlife Tracking Data: Issues of Space, Time, and Statistical Significance. Procedia Environmental Sciences 26: 3–10.
dc.relation.referencesLópez-arévalo, H. F., S. Gallina, R. Landgrave, E. Martínez-meyer, & L. E. Muñoz-villers. 2011. Local knowledge and species distribution models ’ contribution towards mammalian conservation. 144: 1451–1463.
dc.relation.referencesMa, Y. Z., & T. A. Jones. 2001. Teacher’s aide: modeling hole-effect variograms of lithology-indicator variables. Mathematical Geology 33: 631–648.
dc.relation.referencesMantilla-meluk, H., M. E. Rodríguez-posada, & I. M. Vela-vargas. 2014. MAMMALOGY NOTES NOTAS MASTOZOOLÓGICAS ISSN 2382-3704 ( En línea ) VOLUMEN 1 | NÚMERO 1 Abril 2014. Mammalogy Notes Notas Mastozoológicas 1: 12–13.
dc.relation.referencesMantilla-Meluk, Hugo., H. Mantilla-Meluk, A. M. Jiménez-Ortega, & R. J. Baker. 2009. Phyllostomid bats of Colombia : annotated checklist, distribution, and biogeography /. Museum of Texas Tech University ;, Lubbock, TX : Available at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/142854.
dc.relation.referencesMargules, C., & S. Sarkar. 2007. Systematic Conservation Planning. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Arias, V. M., & S. Solari. 2013. Extensión del área de distribución de Sturnira koopmanhilli McCarthy et al. 2006 en Colombia. Therya 4: 617–625.
dc.relation.referencesMedina-Romero, M., I. Goyenechea, & J. Castillo. 2016. Riqueza herpetofaunística potencial y específica en la provincia biogeográfica de la Sierra Madre Oriental. Pp. 303–328. En: Guadalupe Gutiérrez Mayen, Aurelio Ramírez Bautista, Eduardo Pineda (EDS). 2016. Ecología y conservación de anfibios y reptiles de México. Sociedad Herpetológica Mexicana A. C.
dc.relation.referencesMeynard, C. N., V. Devictor, D. Mouillot, W. Thuiller, F. Jiguet, & N. Mouquet. 2011. Beyond taxonomic diversity patterns: how do α, β and γ components of bird functional and phylogenetic diversity respond to environmental gradients across France? Global Ecology and Biogeography 20: 893–903.
dc.relation.referencesMitas, L., & H. Mitasova. 1999. Spatial interpolation. Geographical information systems: principles, techniques, management and applications 1.
dc.relation.referencesMorales-Martínez, D. M., C. Cárdenas-González, C. Fernández-Rodríguez, M. E. Rodríguez-Posada, & L. M. Moreno-Bejarano. 2016. NUEVOS REGISTROS DE Natalus tumidirostris (CHIROPTERA: NATALIDAE) EN COLOMBIA, CON NOTAS SOBRE SU VARIACIÓN MORFOMÉTRICA. Mastozoología Neotropical 23: 557–565.
dc.relation.referencesMorales-Martínez, D. M., & H. E. Ramírez-Chaves. 2015. THE DISTRIBUTION OF BATS OF GENUS LASIURUS (VESPERTILIONIDAE) IN COLOMBIA, WITH NOTES ON TAXONOMY, MORPHOLOGY AND ECOLOGY. Caldasia 37: 397–408.
dc.relation.referencesMorales-Martínez, D., & A. Suárez-Castro. 2014. New records for Glyphonycteris Thomas, 1896 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from Colombia [with erratum]. Check List 10(3): 639–644.
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, C. E., & P. Rodríguez. 2010. A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Oecologia 163: 279–282.
dc.relation.referencesOlson, D. M., & E. Dinerstein. 2002. The Global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical garden: 199–224.
dc.relation.referencesPavan, A. C., & G. Marroig. 2016. Integrating multiple evidences in taxonomy: species diversity and phylogeny of mustached bats (Mormoopidae: Pteronotus). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 103: 184–198.
dc.relation.referencesPeixoto, F. P., P. H. P. Braga, M. V. Cianciaruso, J. A. F. Diniz‐Filho, & D. Brito. 2014. Global patterns of phylogenetic beta diversity components in bats. Journal of Biogeography 41: 762–772.
dc.relation.referencesPereira, M., & D. Figueiredo. 2009. Effects of the Alqueva Dam Reservoir on the Distribution of Steppe Birds. Physical Geography 30: 43–63.
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, & R. E. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. 190: 231–259.
dc.relation.referencesPosadas, P., D. R. M. Esquivel, & J. V. Crisci. 2001. Using Phylogenetic Diversity Measures to Set Priorities in Conservation : an Example from Southern South America. 15: 1325–1334.
dc.relation.referencesPrescott, G. W., J. J. Gilroy, T. Haugaasen, C. A. M. Uribe, W. A. Foster, & D. P. Edwards. 2016. Managing Neotropical oil palm expansion to retain phylogenetic diversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 150–158.
dc.relation.referencesPrieto-Torres, D. A., G. Pinilla-Buitrago, D. A. Prieto-Torres, & G. Pinilla-Buitrago. 2017. Estimating the potential distribution and conservation priorities of Chironectes minimus (Zimmermann, 1780) (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae). Therya 8: 131–144.
dc.relation.referencesPyrcz, M. J., & C. V. Deutsch. 2003. The whole story on the hole effect. Geostatistical Association of Australasia, Newsletter 18: 3–5.
dc.relation.referencesQGIS Development Team. 2018. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source.
dc.relation.referencesR Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
dc.relation.referencesR. Core Team, & C. Worldwide. 2018. The R Stats Package, Version 3.6. Vienna, Austria.
dc.relation.referencesRobert L. Schooley, & J. A. Wiens. 2001. Dispersion of kangaroo rat mounds at multiple scales in New Mexico, USA. Landscape Ecology 6.
dc.relation.referencesRobles-Fernández, Á. L., & A. Lira-Noriega. 2017. Combining phylogenetic and occurrence information for risk assessment of pest and pathogen interactions with host plants. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 3: 17.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, P., & H. T. Arita. 2004. Beta diversity and latitude in North American mammals: testing the hypothesis of covariation. Ecography 27: 547–556.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Posada, M. E., & H. E. Ramírez-Chaves. 2012. Distribución, morfología y reproducción del murciélago rayado de orejas amarillas Vampyriscus nymphaea (Mammalia: Chiroptera) en Colombia. AZM 28. Available at http://azm.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/azm/article/view/837.
dc.relation.referencesRojas-Morales, J. A. 2012. On the geographic distribution of the false coral snake, Rhinobothryum bovallii (Serpentes: Dipsadidae), in Colombia–a biogeographical perspective. Salamandra 48: 243–248.
dc.relation.referencesRosauer, D. F., L. J. Pollock, S. Linke, & W. Jetz. 2017. Phylogenetically informed spatial planning is required to conserve the mammalian tree of life. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20170627.
dc.relation.referencesRozas, V., & J. Camarero. 2005. Técnicas de análisis espacial de patrones de puntos aplicadas en ecología forestal. Investigación agraria. Sistemas y recursos forestales 14: 79–97.
dc.relation.referencesRuedi, M., B. Stadelmann, Y. Gager, E. J. Douzery, C. M. Francis, L.-K. Lin, A. Guillén-Servent, & A. Cibois. 2013. Molecular phylogenetic reconstructions identify East Asia as the cradle for the evolution of the cosmopolitan genus Myotis (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69: 437–449.
dc.relation.referencesSchabenberger, O., & F. J. Pierce. 2001. Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. CRC press.
dc.relation.referencesSISTEMA DE INFORMACIÓN AMBIENTAL DE COLOMBIA – SIAC. 2012. Coberturas de la tierra. Available at http://sig.anla.gov.co:8083/resources/DESCARGA_SIAC/IDEAM/Cobertura_tierra_2010_2012.zip [Accessed 10 July 2018].
dc.relation.referencesSISTEMA DE INFORMACIÓN AMBIENTAL DE COLOMBIA – SIAC. 2018. Ecosistemas de Colombia. Available at http://181.225.72.78/Portal-SIAC-web/faces/Dashboard/Biodiversidad2/mapa_ecosistemas/estadoEcosistemasColombiano.xhtml [Accessed 20 July 2018].
dc.relation.referencesSmith, G.-H. 1935. The relative relief of Ohio. Geographical review 25: 272–284.
dc.relation.referencesSolari, S., & V. Martínez-Arias. 2014. Cambios recientes en la sistemática y taxonomía de murciélagos Neotropicales (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Therya 5: 167–196.
dc.relation.referencesStevens, R. D., M. R. Willig, & R. E. Strauss. 2006. Latitudinal gradients in the phenetic diversity of New World bat communities. 1: 41–50.
dc.relation.referencesTerborgh, J. 1985. The role of ecotones in the distribution of Andean birds. Ecology 66: 1237–1246.
dc.relation.referencesTrakhtenbrot, A., & R. Kadmon. 2006. Effectiveness of environmental cluster analysis in representing regional species diversity. Conservation Biology 20: 1087–1098.
dc.relation.referencesUrrego, D. 2016. Diversidad acústica de los murciélagos insectívoros aéreos en relación a la estructura del hábitat en la sabana xerófila-semiseca de la reserva natural Sanguaré (Norte de Colombia). Trabajo de grado para obtener el título de Magister en Biología, Universidad de Antioquia Medellín.
dc.relation.referencesVela-Vargas, M., & J. Pérez-Torres. 2012. Murciélagos asociados a remanentes de bosque seco tropical en un sistema de ganadería extensiva (Colombia). Chiroptera Neotropical 18: 1089–1100.
dc.relation.referencesVelazco, P. M., & N. B. Simmons. 2011. Systematics and taxonomy of great striped-faced bats of the genus Vampyrodes Thomas, 1900 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). American Museum Novitates 2011: 1–35.
dc.relation.referencesVelázquez, E., I. Martínez, S. Getzin, K. A. Moloney, & T. Wiegand. 2016. An evaluation of the state of spatial point pattern analysis in ecology. Ecography 39: 1042–1055.
dc.relation.referencesVellend, M. 2001. Do commonly used indices of β‐diversity measure species turnover? Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 545–552.
dc.relation.referencesWebb, C. O., D. D. Ackerly, M. A. McPeek, & M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual review of ecology and systematics 33: 475–505.
dc.relation.referencesWebster, W. David., & C. O. Handley. 1986. Systematics of Miller’s long-tongued bat, Glossophaga longirostris : with descriptions of two new subspecies /. [Texas Tech Press], [Lubbock, Tex.] : Available at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/142870 [Accessed 22 July 2017].
dc.relation.referencesWheeler, B. C. 2010. Community ecology of the Middle Miocene primates of La Venta, Colombia: the relationship between ecological diversity, divergence time, and phylogenetic richness. Primates 51: 131–138.
dc.relation.referencesWiegand, T., M. Uriarte, N. J. Kraft, G. Shen, X. Wang, & F. He. 2017. Spatially explicit metrics of species diversity, functional diversity, and phylogenetic diversity: Insights into plant community assembly processes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48: 329–351.
dc.relation.referencesWillig, M. R., & K. W. Selcer. 1989. Bat species density gradients in the New World: a statistical assessment. Journal of Biogeography: 189–195.
dc.relation.referencesZapata-E, C., L. Vargas, L. Bustamante, & D. ZURC. 2018. Inventario De Mamíferos En Tres Zonas De Vida (Holdridge, 1982), Departamentos De Antioquia, Caldas y Bolívar- Colombia. Caldasia (Manuscrito sometido).
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Z., R. Xiao, A. Shortridge, & J. Wu. 2014. Spatial Point Pattern Analysis of Human Settlements and Geographical Associations in Eastern Coastal China — A Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11: 2818–2833.
dc.relation.referencesZunino, M., & A. Zullini. 2003. Biogeografía: La dimensión espacial de la evolución
dc.relation.referencesGrohmann, C. H. 2017. Comparison of roving-window and search-window techniques for characterising landscape morphometry. EarthArXiv, 2017. 43
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalEstadística espacial
dc.subject.proposalSpatial statistics
dc.subject.proposalPredictive models
dc.subject.proposalModelos predictivos
dc.subject.proposalChiroptera
dc.subject.proposalQuirópteros
dc.subject.proposalProtected areas - Caribe (Región, Colombia)
dc.subject.proposalMurciélagos - Diversidad
dc.subject.proposalÁreas protegidas - Caribe (Región, Colombia)
dc.subject.proposalBats - Diversity
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito