Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorMoreno Mantilla, Carlos Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorPercy Guzmán, Henry Armando
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-08T22:19:44Z
dc.date.available2021-07-08T22:19:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79788
dc.descriptionilustraciones, tablas
dc.description.abstractLa investigación en la administración de cadenas de suministro sostenibles se ha enfocado principalmente en las prácticas ambientales de las organizaciones, sin tener en cuenta las tres dimensiones de la sostenibilidad como un conjunto (ambiental, social y económica). Típicamente, el desempeño que considera las tres dimensiones de la sostenibilidad se ha relacionado como la triple cuenta de resultados, o Triple Bottom Line (TBL). Existe un grupo de organizaciones, conocidas como organizaciones híbridas, que estructuran su modelo de negocio desde la sostenibilidad y no se enfocan exclusivamente en el cumplimiento de metas económicas. Para este tipo de organizaciones, dentro de la cadena de suministro, los proveedores pueden tener un efecto importante sobre el cumplimiento de las metas sostenibles establecidas. Dentro del segmento de organizaciones híbridas, existe un grupo denominado B-CORP que cuentan con una certificación que avala sus esfuerzos orientados hacia la sostenibilidad. El objetivo de esta investigación es evaluar los efectos que tiene el desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles sobre el desempeño del TBL, con particular atención al efecto moderador del contexto sobre esta relación. Por medio de un diseño de investigación mixto que inicia con una fase cuantitativa, se seleccionaron 5 organizaciones híbridas a partir de una base de más de 60 organizaciones certificadas como B-CORP con operaciones en Colombia. Posteriormente, se desarrolló una fase cualitativa a través de una serie de entrevistas abiertas con el fin de evaluar las prácticas de desarrollo sostenible hacia sus proveedores, bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales, y su efecto sobre el desempeño del Triple Bottom Line (TBL). Como resultado de este estudio se propone un modelo conceptual que ayuda a entender cómo se relacionan los mecanismos de gobernanza con el desempeño del TBL, confirmando empíricamente una serie de proposiciones derivadas de la literatura. Los resultados del estudio validan los efectos positivos que tienen los mecanismos de manera directa sobre los componentes ambientales y sociales del TBL y de forma indirecta sobre el componente económico. Adicionalmente, se identificaron mecanismos causales específicos que intervienen en estas relaciones, tales como normas y guías de control, alineación sostenible, colaboración/fraternidad/confianza, poder de selección, y fortalecimiento-empoderamiento.
dc.description.abstractResearch in sustainable supply chain management has focused primarily on the environmental practices of organizations, without considering the three dimensions of sustainability (environmental, social, and economic). Typically, performance that considers the three dimensions of sustainability has been related as Triple Bottom Line (TBL). There is a group of organizations, known as hybrid organizations, that structure their business model from sustainability and do not focus exclusively on reaching its economic goals. For these types of organizations, within the supply chain, suppliers can have an important effect on the fulfillment of the established sustainable goals. Within the hybrid organization segment, there is a group called B-CORP that have a certification that endorses their oriented towards sustainability efforts. The research objective is to evaluate the effects of development and evaluation of sustainable suppliers have on the performance of the TBL, with particular attention to the moderating effect of the context on this relationship. Through a mixed research design, begins with a quantitative phase, 5 hybrid organizations were selected from a base of more than 60 organizations certified as B-CORP with operations in Colombia. Subsequently, a qualitative phase was developed through a series of open interviews to evaluate sustainable development practices towards their suppliers, under formal and informal governance mechanisms, and their effect on the performance of the Triple Bottom Line (TBL). As a result of this study, a conceptual model is proposed that helps to understand how governance mechanisms are related to TBL performance, empirically confirming a series of propositions derived from the literature. The results of the study validate the positive effects that the mechanisms have directly on the environmental and social components of the TBL and indirectly on the economic component. Additionally, specific causal mechanisms that intervene in these relationships were identified, such as control norms and guidelines, sustainable alignment, collaboration / fraternity / trust, selection power, and strengthening-empowerment.
dc.format.extent187 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rightsDerechos reservados al autor, 2021
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines
dc.titleEfecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dcterms.audienceGeneral
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrial
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrial
dc.description.researchareaingeniería de la productividad
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAgrawal, S., Singh, R. K., & Murtaza, Q. (2016). Triple bottom line performance evaluation of reverse logistics. Competitiveness Review, 26(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-04-2015-0029
dc.relation.referencesAppolloni, A., Sun, H., Jia, F., & Li, X. (2014). Green Procurement in the private sector: A state of the art review between 1996 and 2013. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85(December 2017), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.106
dc.relation.referencesAragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022
dc.relation.referencesArnold, M. (2017). Fostering sustainability by linking co-creation and relationship management concepts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.059
dc.relation.referencesATLAS.ti. (2012). ATLAS.ti 7 - Guía Rápida.
dc.relation.referencesAwan, U., Kraslawski, A., & Huiskonen, J. (2018). Governing interfirm relationships for social sustainability: The relationship between governance mechanisms, sustainable collaboration, and cultural intelligence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124473
dc.relation.referencesBastas, A., & Liyanage, K. (2019). Integrated quality and supply chain management business diagnostics for organizational sustainability improvement. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.001
dc.relation.referencesbcorporation.net. (n.d.). The Complete Guide to B Corp Certification for Small to Medium-Sized Enterprises Join the Global Movement of People Using Business as a Force for Good.
dc.relation.referencesBocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
dc.relation.referencesBoons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
dc.relation.referencesBurki, U., Ersoy, P., & Dahlstrom, R. (2018). Achieving triple bottom line performance in manufacturer-customer supply chains: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.236
dc.relation.referencesBustos Báez, S., & Wastavino Muñoz, F. (2016). ¿De qué manera las Empresas B generan impactos positivos en el ámbito social y medioambiental? Gestión de Las Personas y Tecnología, 9(27), 21–33.
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
dc.relation.referencesCho, M. (2017). Benefit corporations in the United States and community interest companies in the United Kingdom: Does social enterprise actually work? Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 37(1), 149–172.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (sage (Ed.); 4th ed.). SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England.
dc.relation.referencesDas, D. (2017). Development and validation of a scale for measuring Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1344–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.006
dc.relation.referencesDas, D. (2018). The impact of Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices on firm performance: Lessons from Indian organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.250
dc.relation.referencesde Lange, D. E. (2017). Start-up sustainability: An insurmountable cost or a life-giving investment? Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 838–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.108
dc.relation.referencesDunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
dc.relation.referencesEsfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.013
dc.relation.referencesFormentini, M., & Taticchi, P. (2016). Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1920–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.072
dc.relation.referencesFrança, C. L., Broman, G., Robèrt, K. H., Basile, G., & Trygg, L. (2017). An approach to business model innovation and design for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.124
dc.relation.referencesGadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13.
dc.relation.referencesGerring, J. (2016). Case Study Research Principles and Practices, 2d ed. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Online Education, 000(January), 1–197. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483318332.n58
dc.relation.referencesGimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2013). Sustainable Supply Chains: Governance Mechanisms to Greening Suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1458-4
dc.relation.referencesGimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035
dc.relation.referencesGimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 17(5), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258591
dc.relation.referencesHaigh, N., & Hoffman, A. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006
dc.relation.referencesHart, S. L. (1995). Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy OfManagement Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956246.n472
dc.relation.referencesHernandez Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Mc Graw Hil Education.
dc.relation.referencesHiller, J. S. (2013). The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1580-3
dc.relation.referencesHlavka, E. (2017). Increasing Equity through B Corp Certification in the Coffee Commodity Supply Chain. Capstone Collection. http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones/3006
dc.relation.referencesHuo, B., Gu, M., & Wang, Z. (2019). Green or lean? A supply chain approach to sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.141
dc.relation.referencesJia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.248
dc.relation.referencesJoyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. A., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Arhin, F. K., & Kusi-Sarpong, H. (2018). Supplier sustainability performance evaluation and selection: A framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.144
dc.relation.referencesKim, S., Karlesky, M., Christopher, M., & Schifeling, T. (2016). Why Companies Are Becoming B Corporations. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/06/why-companies-are-becoming-b-corporations
dc.relation.referencesKlewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017
dc.relation.referencesKoberg, E., & Longoni, A. (2019). A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1084–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033
dc.relation.referencesLaubscher, M., & Marinelli, T. (2014). Integration of Circular Economy in Business. Going Green - Care Innovation 2014, November, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4864.4164
dc.relation.referencesLeonidou, L. C., Christodoulides, P., Kyrgidou, L. P., & Palihawadana, D. (2017). Internal Drivers and Performance Consequences of Small Firm Green Business Strategy: The Moderating Role of External Forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2670-9
dc.relation.referencesLewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy-towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043
dc.relation.referencesLo, S. M., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2018). The impact of relationship quality and supplier development on green supply chain integration: A mediation and moderation analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.175
dc.relation.referencesLoewenstein, B. M. J. (2013). Benefit Corporations : A Challenge in Corporate Governance. The Business Lawyer, 68(4), 1007–1038.
dc.relation.referencesLong, T. B., Looijen, A., & Blok, V. (2018). Critical success factors for the transition to business models for sustainability in the food and beverage industry in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.067
dc.relation.referencesLüdeke-Freund, F., Carroux, S., Joyce, A., Massa, L., & Breuer, H. (2018). The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy—45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004
dc.relation.referencesLüdeke-Freund, F., Freudenreich, B., Saviuc, I., Schaltegger, S., & Stock, M. (2017). Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Assessment-A Conceptual Foundation A Review and Synthesis of Research and Practice on Sustainable Business Models View project Sustainability cohort View project "Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Assessment-A C. Analytics, Innovation, and Excellence-Driven Enterprise Sustainability, 169–206. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37879-8_7
dc.relation.referencesMani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., & Dubey, R. (2016). Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from india. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 111, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.003
dc.relation.referencesManning, L., & Soon, J. M. (2016). Development of sustainability indicator scoring (SIS) for the food supply chain. British Food Journal, 118(9), 2097–2125. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2016-0007
dc.relation.referencesMariele, F., Roth, S., & Winkler, I. (2018). B CORP ENTREPRENEURS Analysing the motivations and Values behind Running a Social Business (p. 113). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
dc.relation.referencesMathivathanan, D., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.003
dc.relation.referencesMiemczyk, J., & Luzzini, D. (2019). Achieving triple bottom line sustainability in supply chains: The role of environmental, social and risk assessment practices. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 39(2), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2017-0334
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz, P., Cacciotti, G., & Cohen, B. (2018). The double-edged sword of purpose-driven behavior in sustainable venturing. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.005
dc.relation.referencesNeutzling, D. M., Land, A., Seuring, S., & Nascimento, L. F. M. do. (2018). Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3448–3458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.091
dc.relation.referencesNi, W., & Sun, H. (2018). A contingent perspective on the synergistic effect of governance mechanisms on sustainable supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 23(3), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2017-0260
dc.relation.referencesPanigrahi, S. S., Bahinipati, B., & Jain, V. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management: A review of literature and implications for future research. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(5), 1001–1049. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2018-0003
dc.relation.referencesPeters, G.-J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity. The European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56–69.
dc.relation.referencesPreguntas Frecuentes | Evaluación B. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2021, from https://bimpactassessment.net/how-it-works/frequently-asked-questions/theverification-process#dónde-puedo-ver-cuántos-puntos-vale-cada-pregunta
dc.relation.referencesRajindra, R., Burhanuddin, B., Rukhayati, & Wekke, I. S. (2019). Sustainable supply chain governance mechanisms: Strategic approaches to corporate sustainability. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 232–240.
dc.relation.referencesRashidi, K., & Saen, R. F. (2018). Incorporating dynamic concept into gradual efficiency: Improving suppliers in sustainable supplier development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.092
dc.relation.referencesRauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). Going one’s own way: drivers in developing business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.104
dc.relation.referencesReficco, E., Gutiérrez, R., Jaén, M. H., & Auletta, N. (2018). Collaboration mechanisms for sustainable innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.043
dc.relation.referencesRonzani, C. M., Da Costa, P. R., Da Silva, L. F., Pigola, A., & De Paiva, E. M. (2020). Qualitative methods of analysis: an example of Atlas.TITM Software usage. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 20(4), 284–311. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2020.v20i4.1994
dc.relation.referencesRUES - Registro Unico Empresarial. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2021, from https://www.rues.org.co/
dc.relation.referencesSarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.007
dc.relation.referencesSchulz, S. A., & Flanigan, R. L. (2016). Developing competitive advantage using the triple bottom line: a conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-08-2014-0150
dc.relation.referencesSekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business. In Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102084
dc.relation.referencesSeuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
dc.relation.referencesSiqueira, R. P., & Pitassi, C. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovations: Can mindfulness make a difference? Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1181–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.056
dc.relation.referencesSistema B Colombia. (n.d.). Quiénes Somos. Retrieved January 22, 2021, from https://sistemab.org/quienes-somos-4/
dc.relation.referencesSistema B Colombia. (2020). ¡Febrero en Sistema B! Lanzamiento oficial del SDG Action Manager + Carta anual del presidente del fondo de inversión más grande del mundo -. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/#search/melisa%40sistemab.org/FMfcgxwGDDqlwJWRhrkrWsBMdltqBmZC
dc.relation.referencesSmith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003
dc.relation.referencesStubbs, W. (2017a). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and B Corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1920
dc.relation.referencesStubbs, W. (2017b). Characterising B Corps as a sustainable business model: An exploratory study of B Corps in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.093
dc.relation.referencesStubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model.” Organization and Environment, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042
dc.relation.referencesTaber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
dc.relation.referencesTachizawa, E. M., & Wong, C. Y. (2015). The Performance of Green Supply Chain Management Governance Mechanisms: A Supply Network and Complexity Perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12072
dc.relation.referencesVan Der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1–19.
dc.relation.referencesVurro, C., Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2009). Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(SUPPL. 4), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0595-x
dc.relation.referencesWalker, D. H. T., Bourne, L. M., & Shelley, A. (2008). Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701882390
dc.relation.referencesWalker, H., Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T., & Spencer, R. (2012). Sustainable procurement: Past, present and future. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.11.003
dc.relation.referencesWang, J., & Ran, B. (2018). Sustainable Collaborative Governance in supply chain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010171
dc.relation.referencesWilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2014). The double bottom line: Profit and social benefit. Business Horizons, 57(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.10.001
dc.relation.referencesWilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2015). Evaluating CSR accomplishments of founding certified B Corps. Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-07-2015-0010
dc.relation.referencesYadlapalli, A., Rahman, S., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Socially responsible governance mechanisms for manufacturing firms in apparel supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 196(April 2017), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.016
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (Sage (Ed.); 5th ed.). SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England.
dc.relation.referencesYu, W., Ramanathan, R., & Nath, P. (2017). Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005
dc.relation.referencesYu, Y., & Huo, B. (2019). The impact of environmental orientation on supplier green management and financial performance: The moderating role of relational capital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.198
dc.relation.referencesYunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005
dc.relation.referencesYURDUGÜL, H. (2008). MINIMUM SAMPLE SIZE FOR CRONBACH’S COEFFICIENT ALPHA: A MONTE CARLO STUDY CRONBACH ALFA KATSAYISI ÎÇÎN MÍNÍMUM ÖRNEKLEM GENͧLÍOl: MONTE-CARLO ÇALIÇMASI. 1999, 397–406.
dc.relation.referencesZaid, A. A., Jaaron, A. A. M., & Talib Bon, A. (2018). The impact of green human resource management and green supply chain management practices on sustainable performance: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 965–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.062
dc.relation.referencesZhang, M., Tse, Y. K., Doherty, B., Li, S., & Akhtar, P. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: Confirmation of a higher-order model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.015
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembDesarrollo sostenible
dc.subject.lembSustainable development
dc.subject.proposalDesarrollo de proveedores
dc.subject.proposalMecanismos de gobernanza
dc.subject.proposalDesempeño del triple bottom line
dc.subject.proposalOrganizaciones híbridas
dc.subject.proposalB-CORPS
dc.subject.proposalSupplier development
dc.subject.proposalGovernance mechanisms
dc.subject.proposalTriple Bottom Line performance
dc.subject.proposalHybrid organizations
dc.subject.proposalB-Corps
dc.title.translatedSustainable suppliers development and evaluation effects under formal and informal governance mechanisms on triple bottom line performance in hybrid organizations
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
1032379410.2021.pdf
Tamaño:
2.969Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en ingeniería ...
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito