Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorLópez López, Iván Darío
dc.contributor.authorCastellanos Alzate, Ginna Paola
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T15:47:39Z
dc.date.available2021-11-29T15:47:39Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80739
dc.description.abstractLas Asociaciones Público Privadas (APP) son consideradas una herramienta fundamental para la sostenibilidad de los proyectos de Ciudades Inteligentes y Sostenibles (CIS). Por ello, es fundamental identificar intereses comunes de instituciones sociales y de empresas, ya que, es el camino para forjar desde allí un bien común y que trascienda en la sociedad. Con los Stakeholders en la administración pública, se destaca la importancia de la participación y asociación interinstitucional, ciudadana y privada, en el desarrollo de proyectos de CIS. Sin embargo, son escasas las investigaciones sobre la gestión de relaciones entre la administración de los proyectos y los distintos Stakeholders en la gestión de APPs para el desarrollo de CIS en América Latina y específicamente en Colombia. El propósito es presentar hallazgos significativos en el tema de gestión de relaciones de las APP para proyectos CIS, analizando exhaustivamente las bases de datos científicas. Para concluir, se verifican las bases de datos y se llega a inferir que no existen a la fecha en la literatura disponible, investigaciones que abarquen la gestión de relaciones en APP para el desarrollo de CIS. En lo escaso encontrado se identifican los diferentes Stakeholder de CIS desarrolladas a través de APP, así como su influencia en los diferentes proyectos, y posteriormente se establecen las diferentes relaciones de estos para el correcto desarrollo del proyecto. Esta investigación contribuye al creciente interés científico en APP y CIS, como un factor para desarrollar proyectos enmarcados en ambas temáticas de manera eficiente y exitosa.
dc.description.abstractPublic Private Partnerships (PPPs) are considered a fundamental tool for the sustainability of Smart and Sustainable Cities (SSC) projects. For this reason, it is essential to identify common interests of social institutions and companies, since it is the way to forge a common good from there and that transcends in society. With the Stakeholders in the public administration, the importance of inter-institutional, citizen and private participation and association in the development of SSC projects is highlighted. However, there is little research on the management of relationships between the administration of projects and the different Stakeholders in the management of PPPs for the development of SSC in Latin America and specifically in Colombia. The purpose is to present significant findings on the subject of PPP relationship management for SSC projects, exhaustively analyzing scientific databases. To conclude, the databases are verified and it is inferred that there are no investigations to date in the available literature that cover the management of relationships in PPP for the development of SSC. In the little found, the different SSC Stakeholders developed through APP are identified, as well as their influence on the different projects, and subsequently the different relationships between them are established for the correct development of the project. This research contributes to the growing scientific interest in PPP and SSC, as a factor to develop projects framed in both themes efficiently and successfully.
dc.format.extentix, 65 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc350 - Administración pública y ciencia militar::351 - Administración pública
dc.titleGestión de relaciones de los stakeholders en proyectos de asociaciones público privadas para el desarrollo de ciudades inteligentes y sostenibles en Colombia
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programManizales - Administración - Maestría en Administración
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Administración
dc.description.researchareaGestión Organizacional, Administración de Proyectos, Innovación y Desarrollo.
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Administración
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Administración
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizales
dc.relation.referencesAaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management|, 509–516. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.004.
dc.relation.referencesAaltonen, K., Kujala, J., Havela, L., & Savage, G. (2015). Stakeholder Dynamics During the Project Front-End: The Case of Nuclear Waste Repository Projects. Project Management Journal. doi:10.1002/pmj.21549.
dc.relation.referencesAlada˘g, H., & Isik, Z. (2020). The effect of stakeholder-associated risks in mega engineering projects: A case study of a PPP airport project. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(1), 174–186. doi:10.1109/TEM.2018.2866269.
dc.relation.referencesAlbino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology. doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
dc.relation.referencesAlcaide Muñoz, L., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (2021). Different levels of smart and sustainable cities construction using e-participation tools in European and central Asian countries. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 13(6), 3561. doi:10.3390/su13063561.
dc.relation.referencesAlvarado-López, R. A. (2020). Ciudades inteligentes y sostenibles: una medición a cinco ciudades de México. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Vol. 30, Issue 55. doi:https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v30i55.860.
dc.relation.referencesAmadi, C., Carrillo, P., & Morgan Tuuli, M. (2019). PPP projects: improvements in stakeholder management. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 27(2), 544–560. doi:10.1108/ECAM-07-2018-0289.
dc.relation.referencesAnderson , B. B., & Ratiu, C. (2019). Stakeholder considerations in public-private partnerships. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 212-221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-04-2018-0046.
dc.relation.referencesAnttila, J., & Jussila, K. (2018). Universities and smart cities: The challenges to high quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29:9-10, 1058-1073. doi:10.1080/14783363.2018.1486552.
dc.relation.referencesBanco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). (2019). Asociaciones Público Privadas en Colombia: Directrices para su implementación. Obtenido de https://cursos.iadb.org/es/indes/asociaciones-p-blico-privadas-en-colombia-directrices para-su-implementaci-n-0
dc.relation.referencesBanco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). (2019). Asociaciones Público Privadas en Colombia: Directrices para su implementación. Obtenido de https://cursos.iadb.org/es/indes/asociaciones-p-blico-privadas-en-colombia-directrices para-su-implementaci-n-0
dc.relation.referencesBanco Interamericano de Desarrollo. (2016). La ruta hacia las Smart Cities: Migrando de una gestión tradicional a la ciudad inteligente. Obtenido de https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/La-ruta-hacia-las-smart-cities Migrando-de-una-gesti%C3%B3n-tradicional-a-la-ciudad-inteligente.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesBenítez-Ávila, C., Hartmann, A., Dewulf, G., & Henseler, J. (2018). Interplay of relational and contractual governance in public-private partnerships: The mediating role of relational norms, trust and partners’ contribution. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 429–443. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.12.005.
dc.relation.referencesBerawi, M. A. (2019). Public–Private Partnership: Generating Mutual Benefits for Stakeholders. International Journal of Technology, Volume 10(1), pp. 1-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i1.2835.
dc.relation.referencesBourne, L., & Walker, D. (2008). Project relationship management and the Stakeholder Circle. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 125-130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370810846450.
dc.relation.referencesBoyer, E. (2019). How does public participation affect perceptions of public–private partnerships? A citizens’ view on push, pull, and network approaches in PPPs. Management Review, 21:10, 1464-1485. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1559343.
dc.relation.referencesBrioschi, M., Bonardi, M., Fabrizio, N., Fuggetta, A., Sergio Verga, E., & Zuccalà, M. (2021). Enabling and Promoting Sustainability through Digital API Ecosystems: An example of successful implementation in the smart city domain. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4–10.
dc.relation.referencesBucur, G., SUCIU, G., & Conu, R. (2019). The importance of Social Media in Smart Cities. INCD URBAN-INCERC, 197-202.
dc.relation.referencesBurke, R., & Demirag, I. (2017). Risk transfer and stakeholder relationships in Public Private Partnerships. Accounting Forum, 41:1, 28-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.004
dc.relation.referencesCalderón, M., López, G., & Marín, G. (2017). Smart Cities in Latin America. Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67585-5_2.
dc.relation.referencesCaldwell, N., Roehrich, J., & George, G. (2017). Social value creation and relational coordination in public-private collaborations. The Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 906–928. doi:10.1111/joms.12268
dc.relation.referencesCanhoto, A., Meadows, M., Ball, K., Daniel, E., Dibb , S., & Spiller, K. (2017). The role of customer management capabilities in public–private partnerships. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25:5-6, 384-404. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2016.1148769.
dc.relation.referencesCárcamo Vásquez, H. (2005). Hermenéutica y Análisis Cualitativo. Cinta moebio, 23: 204- 216.
dc.relation.referencesCastelblanco, G., Guevara, J., Mesa, H., & Sanchez, A. (2021). Semantic Network Analysis of Literature on Public-Private Partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(5), 04021033. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002041.
dc.relation.referencesChang, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-C., Tsai, S.-B., & Lin, S.-B. (2011). An Overview of the Stakeholder Approach -Maintaining and Building the Effective Relationship Management for Value Seeking Strategies. International Conference on Management and Service Science. doi:10.1109/ICMSS.2011.5998218.
dc.relation.referencesChowdhury, A. N., Chen, P.-H., & Tiong, R. (2011). Analysing the structure of public–private partnership projects using network theory. Construction Management and Economics, 247–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.537354.
dc.relation.referencesde Madariaga, J., & Valor, C. (2007). Stakeholders Management Systems: Empirical Insights from Relationship Marketing and Market Orientation Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 425–439. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9149-7.
dc.relation.referencesDe Schepper, S., Dooms, M., & Haezendonck, E. (2014). Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in Public–Private Partnerships: A mixed experience. International Journal of Project Management, 210–1222. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.006.
dc.relation.referencesDeng, B., Zhou, D., Zhao, J., Yin, Y., & Li, X. (2021). Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of the critical success factors for the sustainability of public Private Partnership projects in China. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 13(5), 2551. doi:10.3390/su13052551.
dc.relation.referencesDNP Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2013). Abecé de Asociaciones Público Privadas . Obtenido de https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Participacin%20privada%20en%20proyectos%20de %20infraestructu/HA01%20ABC%20APP%202016.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesDNP Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2019). Misión Sistema de Ciudades. Obtenido de https://osc.dnp.gov.co/administrator/components/com_publicaciones/uploads/Misin_Siste ma_de_Ciudades.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesDNP, D. (2020). Documento de Lineamientos de Política de Ciudades Inteligentes.
dc.relation.referencesDNP, D., & Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social. (2014). Conpes 3819. Política Nacional para Consolidar el Sistema de Ciudades en Colombia . Bogotá D.C.
dc.relation.referencesDomenico Sandulli, F., Ferraris, A., & Bresciani, S. (2016). How to select the right public partner in smart city projects. R & D Management. doi:10.1111/radm.12250.
dc.relation.referencesDupont , L., Morel, L., & Guidat , C. (2015). Innovative public-private partnership to support Smart City: the case of “Chaire REVES”. Journal of Strategy and Management, 245-265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-03-2015-0027.
dc.relation.referencesEskerod, P., Huemann, M., & Ringhofer, C. (2015). Stakeholder Inclusiveness: Enriching Project Management with General Stakeholder Theory. Project Management Journal, Vol. 46, No. 6, 42–53. doi:10.1002/pmj.21546.
dc.relation.referencesEspinosa Seguí, A., & Hernandez, T. (2015). A comparison of public and private partnership models for urban commercial revitalization in Canada and Spain. The Canadian Geographer. Le Géographe canadien, 60(1), 107–122. doi:10.1111/cag.12226.
dc.relation.referencesFalch, M., & Maestrini, M. (2019). Public Private Partnership in Smart city waste management – a Business Case. Smart Cities & Information and Communication Technology, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1109/CTTE-FITCE.2019.8894820.
dc.relation.referencesFirmino, S. (2018). Critical success factors of Public-Private Partnerships: political and institutional Aspects. Case study of highways in Portugal. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 52(6):1270-1281. doi:10.1590/0034-761220170228
dc.relation.referencesGohari, S., Baer, D., Nielsen, B. F., Gilcher, E., & Situmorang, W. Z. (2020). Prevailing approaches and practices of citizen participation in smart city projects: Lessons from Trondheim, Norway. Infrastructures, 5(4), 36. doi:10.3390/infrastructures5040036
dc.relation.referencesGrossi, G., & Trunova, O. (2021). Are UN SDGs useful for capturing multiple values of smart city? Cities, 114(103193), 103193. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103193.
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez Gómez, C. (s.f.). UNESCO. Obtenido de El desarrollo sostenible: Conceptos básicos, alcance y criterios para su evaluación: http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/FIELD/Havana/pdf/Cap3.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesGwiaździński, E., & Kaczorowska-Spychalska, D. (2020). Is it a smart city a creative place? Creativity Studies, 460–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.12190.
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación. Quinta edición. México D.F. : McGRAW-HILL
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. McGraw Hill Education
dc.relation.referencesHodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public – Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review. Public Administration Review, 545-558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x.
dc.relation.referencesHollands, R. (2008). Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? City, 303 — 320. doi:10.1080/13604810802479126.
dc.relation.referencesIelite, I., Olevsky, G., & Safiulins, T. (2015). Identification and prioritization of stakeholders in theplanning process of sustainable development of the smart city. IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems, 251-257. doi:10.1109/IntelCIS.2015.7397229.
dc.relation.referencesIrazábal, C., & Jirón, P. (2021). Latin American smart cities: Between worlding infatuation and crawling provincialising. Urban Studies, 58(3), 507–534. doi:10.1177/0042098020945201.
dc.relation.referencesIsrailidis, J., Odusanya, K., & Usman Mazhar, M. (2021). Exploring knowledge management perspectives in smart city research: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 56(101989), 101989. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.015.
dc.relation.referencesJawahar, I., & McLaughlin, G. (2001). Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: An Organizational Life Cycle Approach. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 397-414.
dc.relation.referencesJayasena, N. S., Chan, D. W., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2020). A systematic literature review and analysis towards developing PPP models for delivering smart infrastructure. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 121–137. doi:10.1108/BEPAM-11- 2019-0124.
dc.relation.referencesJayasena, N. S., Waidyasekara, K., Mallawaarachchi, H., & Peiris, S. (2021). Ensuring Engagement of Stakeholders in Smart City Projects: Case Study in Sri Lanka. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Volume 147, Issue 4. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943- 5444.0000762.
dc.relation.referencesJayasena, N., Mallawarachchi, H., & Waidyasekara, A. (2019). Stakeholder Analysis For Smart City Development Project: An Extensive. MATEC Web of Conferences, 266(2):06012. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201926606012.
dc.relation.referencesJayasuriya, S., Zhang, G., & Yang, R. (2020). Exploring the impact of stakeholder management strategies on managing issues in PPP projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 666-678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1753143
dc.relation.referencesKang, S., Mulaphong, D., Hwang, E., & Chang, C.-K. (2018). Public-private partnerships in developing countries: Factors for successful adoption and implementation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(4), 334–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM 01-2018-0001.
dc.relation.referencesKoops, L., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Bakker, H., & Hertogh, M. (2017). Exploring the influence of external actors on the cooperation in public–private project organizations for constructing infrastructure. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 618-632. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.012.
dc.relation.referencesLee, C.-S., Foo, J.-J., Sangar, V., Chan, P.-Y., Hor, W.-K., & Chan, E.-K. (2017). A knowledge management-extended gamified customer relationship management system. International Conference on Soft Computing, Intelligent System and Information Technology, 341-346. doi:10.1109/ICSIIT.2017.46.
dc.relation.referencesLi, Y., & Wang, X. (2018). Risk assessment for public–private partnership projects: using a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process method and expert opinion in China. Journal of Risk Research, 21:8, 952-973. doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1264451.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, T., Mostafa, S., Mohamed, S., & Nguyen, T. S. (2020). Emerging themes of public private partnership application in developing smart city projects: a conceptual framework. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), 138–156. doi:10.1108/BEPAM 12-2019-0142.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, T., Wang, Y., & Wilkinson, S. (2016). Identifying critical factors affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of tendering processes in Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs): A comparative analysis of Australia and China. International Journal of Project Management, 701-716. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.004.
dc.relation.referencesLoredana , I., Beu, D., & van Hoof, J. (2020). Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Overview of Public Policy and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14). doi:10.3390/ijerph17145202.
dc.relation.referencesMainardes, E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision, Vol. 50 Iss: 10 pp. 1861 - 1879. doi:10.1108/00251741211279648.
dc.relation.referencesMakarchenko, M., Nerkararian, S., & Shmeleva, I. (2016). How traditional banks should work in smart city. Communications in Computer and Information Science. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_13.
dc.relation.referencesMalaeb, Z., & Hamzeh, F. (2018). A Lean Perspective of Stakeholder Integration in Public Private Partnerships. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 3–12. doi:doi.org/10.24928/2018/0217
dc.relation.referencesMaraña, P., Labaka, L., & Sarriegi, J. M. (2020). We need them all: development of a public private people partnership to support a city resilience building process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154(119954), 119954. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119954.
dc.relation.referencesMazur, A., & Pisarski, A. (2015). Major project managers' internal and external stakeholder relationships: The development and validation of measurement scales. International Journal of Project Management. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.008.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones (MINTIC). (2019). Propuesta - Modelo de Madurez de Ciudades y Territorios Inteligentes
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. (2018). Lineamientos de Política Pública en materia de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones - TIC, para la promoción de un modelo de ciudades y territorios inteligentes (ciudades i). Obtenido de https://mintic.gov.co/portal/715/articles-64032_recurso_1.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesMitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 4. PP. 853-886.
dc.relation.referencesMolwus, J. J., Erdogan, B., & Ogunlana, S. (2017). Using structural equation modelling (SEM) to understand the relationships among critical success factors (CSFs) for stakeholder management in construction. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 426-450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2015-0161.
dc.relation.referencesMwesigwa, R., Nabwami, R., Mayengo, J., & Basulira, G. (2020). Contractual completeness as a cornerstone to stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Uganda. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 469–484. doi:10.1108/BEPAM-09-2019-0083.
dc.relation.referencesMyllykangas, P., Kujala, J., & Lehtima¨ki, H. (2010). Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency? Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 96, Pages 65 - 72. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0945-3.
dc.relation.referencesNaciones Unidas. (s.f.). Naciones Unidas. Obtenido de https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/cities/.
dc.relation.referencesNguyen, T., Mohamed, S., & Panuwatwanich, K. (2018). Stakeholder Management in Complex Project: Review of Contemporary Literature. Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management, 8(2), 75-89. doi:10.32738/JEPPM.201807.0003.
dc.relation.referencesØkland, A. (2015). Gap analysis for incorporating sustainability in project management. Procedia Computer Science, 103 – 109. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.469
dc.relation.referencesOliveira Cruz, C., & Miranda Sarmento, J. (2017). Reforming traditional PPP models to cope with the challenges of smart cities. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 18(1-2), 94–114. doi:10.1177/1783591717734794.
dc.relation.referencesOnkila, T. (2011). Multiple forms of stakeholder interaction in environmental management: business arguments regarding differences in stakeholder relationships. Business Strategy and the Environment, 379-393. doi:10.1002/bse.693
dc.relation.referencesOsei-Kyei , R., & Chan, A. (2017). Implementing public–private partnership (PPP) policy for public construction projects in Ghana: critical success factors and policy implications. International Journal of Construction Management, 17(2), 113–123. doi:10.1080/15623599.2016.1207865.
dc.relation.referencesOsei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. (2015). Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1335–1346. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.008.
dc.relation.referencesOsei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. (2018). Model for predicting the success of public–private partnership infrastructure projects in developing countries: a case of Ghana. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 213-232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2018.1545632.
dc.relation.referencesOsei-Kyei, R., Chan, A., Javed, A. A., & Ameyaw , E. E. (2017). Critical success criteria for public-private partnership projects: international experts’ opinion. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 21(1), 87–100. doi:10.3846/1648715X.2016.1246388.
dc.relation.referencesPanda, D. (2016). Public private partnerships and value creation: the role of relationship dynamics. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(1), 162–183. doi:10.1108/IJOA-12-2014-0830.
dc.relation.referencesParker, D., Dressel, U., & Zeppetella, L. (2018). Agency theory perspective on public private-partnerships: international development project. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(2), 239–259. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0191.
dc.relation.referencesParmar, B., Freeman, R., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., De Colle, S., & Purnell, L. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4, No. 1. doi:10.1080/19416520.2010.495581.
dc.relation.referencesPerboli, G., & Rosano, M. (2020). A taxonomic analysis of Smart City projects in North America and Europe. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 12(18), 7813. doi:10.3390/su12187813.
dc.relation.referencesPerles Ribes, J. F., & Baidal, J. I. (2019). Smart sustainability: A new perspective in the sustainable tourism debate. Investigaciones Regionales-Journal of Regional Research, 151–170
dc.relation.referencesPolese, F., Barile, S., Caputo, F., Carrubbo, L., & Waletzky, L. (2018). Determinants for value cocreation and collaborative paths in complex service systems: A focus on (smart) cities. Service Science, 10(4), 397–407. doi:10.1287/serv.2018.0218.
dc.relation.referencesRajablu, M., Marthandan, G., & Wan Yusoff, W. F. (2015). Managing for Stakeholders: The Role of Stakeholder-Based Management in Project Success. Asian Social Science, Vol. 11, No. 3; 2015. doi:10.5539/ass.v11n3p111.
dc.relation.referencesReal Academia Española. (s.f.). Real Academia Española. Obtenido de https://www.rae.es/.
dc.relation.referencesRowley, T. (1997). A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 887-910.
dc.relation.referencesSelim, A., & ElGohary, A. (2020). Public–private partnerships (PPPs) in smart infrastructure projects: the role of stakeholders. HBRC Journal|, 16:1, 317-333. doi:10.1080/16874048.2020.1825038.
dc.relation.referencesSelim, A., & Yousef, P. (2018). Smart infrastructure by (PPPs) within the concept of smart cities to achieve sustainable development. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure, 14(2), 182.
dc.relation.referencesŞener, İ., Varoğlu, A., & Karapolatgil, A. (2016). Sustainability Reports Disclosures: Who are the Most Salient Stakeholders? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84 – 92. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.028
dc.relation.referencesSerra, J., Font, X., & Ivanova, M. (2017). Creating shared value in destination management organisations: The case of Turisme de Barcelona. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(4), 385–395. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.06.005
dc.relation.referencesSmyth, H. (2008). The credibility gap in stakeholder management: ethics and evidence of relationship management. Construction Management and Economics, 633-643. doi:10.1080/01446190801905414.
dc.relation.referencesSnow, C., Håkonsson, D. D., & Obel, B. (2016). A smart city is a collaborative community. California Management Review, 59(1), 92–108. doi:10.1177/0008125616683954.
dc.relation.referencesTan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 12(3), 899. doi:10.3390/su12030899.
dc.relation.referencesTang, L., & Shen, Q. (2013). Factors affecting effectiveness and efficiency of analyzing stakeholders’ needs at the briefing stage of public private partnership projects. International Journal of Project Management, 513–521. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.010.
dc.relation.referencesUribe, D., Ortíz-Marcos, I., & Uruburu, Á. (2018). What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(4):1300. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041300.
dc.relation.referencesWang, D., Wang, X., Liu, M., Liu, H., & Liu, B. (2021). Managing public–private partnerships: a transmission pattern of underlying dynamics determining project performance. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 1038-1059. doi:10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0034.
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2018). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Obtenido de World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesWojewnik-Filipkowska , A., & Węgrzyn , J. (2019). Understanding of Public–Private Partnership Stakeholders as a Condition of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 1(4), 1194. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041194.
dc.relation.referencesXue, Y., Temeljotov-Salaj, A., Engebø, A., & Lohne, J. (2020). Multi-sector partnerships in the urban development context: A scoping review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268(122291). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122291.
dc.relation.referencesZhang, X., & Chen, S. (2013). A systematic framework for infrastructure development through public private partnerships. IATSS Research, 88-97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.11.001.
dc.relation.referencesZimmerling, E., Purtik, H., & Welpe, I. (2016). End-users as co-developers for novel green products and services - an exploratory case study analysis of the innovation process in. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.160.
dc.relation.referencesZou, W., Kumaraswamy, M., Chung, J., & Wong, J. (2014). Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects. International Journal of Project Management, 265–274. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.004
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembDesarrollo sostenible -- Innovaciones tecnológicas
dc.subject.proposalAsociaciones Público Privadas
dc.subject.proposalAPP
dc.subject.proposalStakeholders
dc.subject.proposalGestión de Relaciones
dc.subject.proposalCiudades Inteligentes y Sostenibles
dc.subject.proposalPublic-Private Partnerships
dc.subject.proposalPPP
dc.subject.proposalRelationship Management
dc.subject.proposalSmart and Sustainable Cities
dc.subject.unescoSustainable development
dc.title.translatedStakeholder relationship management in public-private partnership projects for the development of smart and sustainable cities in Colombia
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentImage
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentAdministradores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticos


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito