Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorPeña Reyes, José Ismael
dc.contributor.advisorCamargo, Mauricio
dc.contributor.advisorDupont, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorOsorio Bustamante, Ferney
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T20:56:42Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T20:56:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81040
dc.descriptionilustraciones, graficas
dc.description.abstractSince several years now, there has been a proliferation of prodigious spaces for fostering creativity and innovation. Governments, companies, universities, and communities have turned to the implementation of innovation labs as the places where innovation processes are expected to be enhanced through open and agile forms of collaboration. However, there are concerns on how the lack of a clear and shared strategic intent undermines the innovation labs’ purpose and how these initiatives struggle to share and align their strategic intent with all the stakeholders. Thus, this dissertation, following an action research approach under multiple research settings, aims to explain how the strategic intent of innovation labs is built and can be used to guide their performance. Throughout this thesis, innovation labs are recognized as intermediary organizational forms created to support and facilitate the innovation intent in multi-stakeholder contexts. Moreover, it is also addressed how innovation lab settings require sensemaking and feedback processes that allow them to create and maintain a strategic alignment among their stakeholders. Accordingly, this work focuses on the design of mechanisms that enable (1) the representation of the constituent elements of the organizational strategic intent of an innovation lab, (2) understanding how this intent unfolds over time and the stages it goes through, and (3) the identification of competences and roles within innovation lab teams that help to navigate the innovation lab intent. Altogether, they constitute a methodological approach to support strategy making processes in such collaborative environments.
dc.description.abstractDesde hace varios años ha habido una fuerte emergencia de lugares predilectos para fomentar la creatividad y la innovación. Gobiernos, empresas, universidades y comunidades están optando cada vez más por la creación de laboratorios de innovación con el objetivo de facilitar los procesos de innovación mediante formas de colaboración abiertas y ágiles. Sin embargo, existe la preocupación de cómo la falta de una intención estratégica clara y compartida afecta al propósito de los laboratorios de innovación y cómo estas iniciativas luchan para lograr una intención estratégica compartida y alineada con todas las partes interesadas. Siguiendo un enfoque de investigación-acción con varios escenarios de investigación, esta tesis busca explicar cómo se construye la intención estratégica de los laboratorios de innovación y cómo puede utilizarse para guiar el funcionamiento de estos laboratorios. En esta tesis, los laboratorios de innovación se reconocen como formas organizativas intermediarias creadas para apoyar y facilitar la intención de innovación en contextos de múltiples partes interesadas. Además, también se aborda cómo la gestión de los laboratorios de innovación requiere procesos de creación de sentido y retroalimentación que les permitan crear y mantener una alineación estratégica entre sus partes interesadas. En consecuencia, este trabajo se centra en el diseño de mecanismos que permitan (1) la representación de los elementos constitutivos de la intención estratégica organizativa de un laboratorio de innovación, (2) la comprensión de cómo evoluciona esta intención a lo largo del tiempo y las etapas por las que esta pasa, y (3) la identificación de competencias y roles dentro de los equipos de los laboratorios de innovación que ayudan a navegar la intención del laboratorio de innovación. Estos resultados en su conjunto constituyen un enfoque metodológico para apoyar los procesos de elaboración de estrategias en estos entornos de colaboración. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractDepuis plusieurs années, les espaces propices à la créativité et à l'innovation se multiplient. Les gouvernements, les entreprises, les universités et les communautés se sont tournés vers la mise en place de laboratoires d'innovation comme lieux où les processus d'innovation sont censés être améliorés par des formes de collaboration ouvertes et agiles. Cependant, il existe des préoccupations concernant le fait que l’absence d'une intention stratégique claire et partagée fragilise la finalité des laboratoires d'innovation et que ces initiatives peinent à faire converger et à partager leur intention stratégique avec toutes les parties prenantes. Par conséquent, cette thèse, en suivant une approche de rechercheaction dans plusieurs contextes de recherche, vise à expliquer comment l’intention stratégique des laboratoires d’innovation est construite et peut être utilisée pour guider leur performance. Dans cette recherche, les laboratoires d’innovation sont reconnus comme des formes organisationnelles intermédiaires créées pour soutenir et faciliter l’intention d’innovation dans des contextes multi-acteurs. En outre, il est également abordé la manière dont les laboratoires d'innovation requièrent des processus de prise de conscience et de restitution qui leur permettent de créer et de maintenir un alignement stratégique parmi leurs parties prenantes. En conséquence, ce travail se concentre sur la conception d’outils qui permettent (1) de représenter les éléments constitutifs de l’intention stratégique organisationnelle d’un laboratoire d’innovation, (2) de comprendre comment cette intention se déploie dans le temps et les étapes qu’elle traverse, et (3) d’identifier les compétences et les rôles au sein des équipes du laboratoire d’innovation contribuant à guider l’intention du laboratoire d’innovation. L'ensemble de ces résultats constitue une approche méthodologique pour accompagner les processus de conception de stratégies au sein des espaces collaboratifs.
dc.format.extentxxi, 253 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc720 - Arquitectura::727 - Edificios para educación e investigación
dc.titleManagement of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gistic
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ingeniería
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAcevedo, S., & Dassen, N. (2016). Innovation for better management: The contribution of public innovation labs. In Technical Note. https://publications.iadb.org/en/innovationbetter-management-contribution-public-innovation-labs
dc.relation.referencesAgogué, M., Berthet, E., Fredberg, T., le Masson, P., Segrestin, B., Stoetzel, M., Wiener, M., & Yström, A. (2017). Explicating the role of innovation intermediaries in the “unknown”: a contingency approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 10(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-01-2015-0005
dc.relation.referencesAguilar, M. G. S., Rosillo, V. M. L., Perez, C. O. M., Arellano, Ma. R. M., Ramirez, J. R. B., & Trejo, J. A. O. (2019). Analysis of Wastewater Production to Implement Circular Economy Solutions in a Smart Cities University Campus Living Lab. 2019 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC246665.2019.9071711
dc.relation.referencesAhmad, T., Ahmad, S., Jamshed, M., Sherwani, F. K., Ali, R., Khan, W., Nomani, A., & Qaisar, T. M. (2017). An ISM approach for analyzing the enablers in India’s makerspace platforms. 2017 Learning and Technology Conference (L&T) - The MakerSpace: From Imagining to Making!, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/LT.2017.8088121
dc.relation.referencesAllen, J. P., & van der Velden, R. K. W. (2005). The role of self-assessment in measuring skills (No. 2; REFLEX Working Paper Series). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:153922219
dc.relation.referencesAmabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167. http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Group_Performance/Amabile_A_Model_of_CreativityOrg.Beh_v10_pp123-167.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAmenta, L., Attademo, A., Remøy, H., Berruti, G., Cerreta, M., Formato, E., Palestino, M. F., & Russo, M. (2019). Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach. Urban Planning, 4(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170
dc.relation.referencesAndersen, E. S., & Jessen, S. A. (2003). Project maturity in organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00088-1
dc.relation.referencesAnnett, M., Grossman, T., Wigdor, D., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2019). Exploring and Understanding the Role of Workshop Environments in Personal Fabrication Processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301420
dc.relation.referencesApolitical. (2019, February). Public innovation labs around the world are closing — here’s why. The Future of Government. https://apolitical.co/solution_article/public-innovation-labsaround-the-world-are-closing-heres-why/
dc.relation.referencesAppelo, J. (2011). Management 3.0 : leading Agile developers, developing Agile leaders. Addison Wesley.
dc.relation.referencesArciniegas, G., Šileryté, R., Dąbrowski, M., Wandl, A., Dukai, B., Bohnet, M., & Gutsche, J.-M. (2019). A Geodesign Decision Support Environment for Integrating Management of Resource Flows in Spatial Planning. Urban Planning, 4(3), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2173
dc.relation.referencesArgyris, C. (1977, September). Double Loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review, 115–125. https://hbr.org/1977/09/double-loop-learning-in-organizations Argyris,
dc.relation.referencesC. (2002). Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.8509400
dc.relation.referencesArnould, M., Morel, L., & Fournier, M. (2020). Developing a territorial diagnostic as part of a living lab process: Implementation to improve management and wood mobilization in small French private forest. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198373
dc.relation.referencesBadilescu-Buga, E. (2013). Knowledge behaviour and social adoption of innovation. Information Processing and Management, 49(4), 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.02.001
dc.relation.referencesBaedeker, C., Piwowar, J., Themann, P., Grinewitschus, V., Krisemendt, B., Lepper, K., Zimmer, C., & von Geibler, J. (2020). Interactive Design to Encourage Energy Efficiency in Offices: Developing and Testing a User-Centered Building Management System Based on a Living Lab Approach. Sustainability, 12(17), 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176956
dc.relation.referencesBartelt, V. L., Urbaczewski, A., Mueller, A. G., & Sarker, S. (2020). Enabling collaboration and innovation in Denver’s smart city through a living lab: a social capital perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1762127
dc.relation.referencesBaskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 1996 11:3, 11(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/026839696345289
dc.relation.referencesBeel, J., Aizawa, A., Breitinger, C., & Gipp, B. (2017). Mr. DLib: Recommendations-as-a-Service (RaaS) for Academia. 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2017.7991606
dc.relation.referencesBeel, J., Collins, A., Kopp, O., Dietz, L. W., & Knoth, P. (2019). Online Evaluations for Everyone: Mr. DLib’s Living Lab for Scholarly Recommendations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 11438 LNCS (pp. 213–219). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15719-7_27
dc.relation.referencesBelbin, R. M. (2010). Team roles at work, second edition. In Team Roles at Work, Second Edition (Second). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080963242
dc.relation.referencesBenabbas, A., & Nicklas, D. (2019). Quality-Aware Sensor Data Stream Management in a Living Lab Environment. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730858
dc.relation.referencesBjörklund, T., Keipi, T., Celik, S., & Ekman, K. (2019). Learning across silos: Design Factories as hubs for co‐creation. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 552–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12372
dc.relation.referencesBjörklund, T., Laakso, M., Kirjavainen, S., & Ekman, K. (2017). Passion-based co-creation. Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/29068
dc.relation.referencesBjörklund, T., Luukkonen, S., Clavert, M., Kirjavainen, S., & Laakso, M. (2011). Aalto University Design Factory through the eyes of its community members. Aalto University Design Factory. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/12171
dc.relation.referencesBlok, V. (2021). What Is Innovation?: Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Innovation. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 25(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/TECHNE2020109129
dc.relation.referencesBloom, L., & Faulkner, R. (2016). Innovation spaces: lessons from the United Nations. Third World Quarterly, 37(8), 1371–1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1135730
dc.relation.referencesBoeri, A., Longo, D., Gianfrate, V., & Lorenzo, V. (2017). Resilient Communities. Social Infrastructures for Sustainable Growth of Urban Areas. A Case Study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(02), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N2-227-237
dc.relation.referencesBöhm, K., & Paul, C. (2019). “CoMod” A Model to Support Collaboration and Innovation Between Digital Innovation Labs and SMEs. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Knowledge Management, 1, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.34190/KM.19.066
dc.relation.referencesBoly, V., Camargo, M., & Morel, L. (2016). Ingénierie de l’Innovation (3e Édition). Lavoisier, Hermès. https://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/economie/ingenierie-de-l-innovation-et-projetsinnovants-3e-ed/boly/descriptif-9782746247475
dc.relation.referencesBouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Brem, A. (2019). Permeability in Coworking-Spaces as an Innovation Facilitator. 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893737
dc.relation.referencesBousbiat, H., Klemenjak, C., Leitner, G., & Elmenreich, W. (2020). Augmenting an Assisted Living Lab with Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring. 2020 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC43012.2020.9128406
dc.relation.referencesBradbury, H. (2015). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research (H. Bradbury, Ed.; Third). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-action-research/book242797
dc.relation.referencesBreytenbach, J., & Kariem, I. (2020). A Living Labs Approach to Manage Co-created Design Knowledge through Ideation Artefacts. 2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.245373
dc.relation.referencesBrock, K. L. (2020). Government and Non-profit Collaboration in Times of Deliverology, Policy Innovation Laboratories and Hubs, and New Public Governance. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00145-0
dc.relation.referencesBurgelman, R. A., & Grove, A. S. (1996). Strategic Dissonance. California Management Review, 38(2), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165830
dc.relation.referencesCaccamo, M. (2020). Leveraging innovation spaces to foster collaborative innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, caim.12357. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12357
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la démocratie technique. Seuil.
dc.relation.referencesCamargo, M., Morel, L., & Lhoste, P. (2021). Progressive University Technology Transfer of Innovation Capabilities to SMEs: An Active and Modular Educational Partnership. In D. Mietzner & C. Schultz (Eds.), New Perspectives in Technology Transfer. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. (1st ed., pp. 181–205). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_11
dc.relation.referencesCapdevila, I. (2013). Typologies of Localized Spaces of Collaborative Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, January, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414402
dc.relation.referencesCarstensen, H. V., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering Collaborative Policy Innovation: Can Innovation Labs Help? The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–25. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2986463431/poweringcollaborative-policy-innovation-can-innovation
dc.relation.referencesCarter, K., Morgan, E., Webb, L., Goddard, N., & Webb, J. (2017). Enhance: The assembly rooms energy living lab. Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017, 1, 669–676.
dc.relation.referencesChatenier, E. du, Verstegen, J. A. A. M., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. W. F. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R and D Management, 40(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.x
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34–41.
dc.relation.referencesChessa, S., Girolami, M., Foschini, L., Ianniello, R., Corradi, A., & Bellavista, P. (2017). Mobile crowd sensing management with the ParticipAct living lab. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 38, 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.09.005
dc.relation.referencesChristensen, M. H., Li, R., & Pinson, P. (2020). Demand side management of heat in Smart homes: Living-lab experiments. Energy, 195, 116993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116993
dc.relation.referencesClaire, J., Galvez, D., Boly, V., Camargo, M., & Moselle, J. C. (2014). A new innovation Project maturity assessment methodology based on innovation degree. 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2014.6871614
dc.relation.referencesCorsini, L., Dammicco, V., & Moultrie, J. (2020). Frugal innovation in a crisis: the digital fabrication maker response to COVID‐19. R&D Management, radm.12446. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12446
dc.relation.referencesCrippa, D., & di Prete, B. (2019). Towards a Digital Healthcare Revolution Views and Researches of the Milanese FabLab Community. In T. S., M. B., K. W., D. N. M., & R. E. (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 793, pp. 214–223). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_20
dc.relation.referencesDalziel, M. (2010). Why do innovation intermediaries exist. DRUID Summer Conference 2010 on Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Innovation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228855626_Why_do_innovation_intermediaries_exist
dc.relation.referencesDeCusatis, C. (2008). Creating, Growing and Sustaining Efficient Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00478.x
dc.relation.referencesdel Vecchio, P., Elia, G., Ndou, V., Secundo, G., & Specchia, F. (2017). Living Lab as an Approach to Activate Dynamic Innovation Ecosystems and Networks: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(05), 1750024. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500249
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, L., Galvez, D., Hassan, A., Palominos, P., & Morel, L. (2020). Innovation Spaces in Universities: Support for Collaborative Learning. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 31(1), 123–153. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0064
dc.relation.referencesDeng, J. (2018). Exploration of building and running open labs in application-technology universities. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.26802/jaots.2018.10834
dc.relation.referencesDougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). SUSTAINED PRODUCT INNOVATION IN LARGE, MATURE ORGANIZATIONS: OVERCOMING INNOVATION-TO-ORGANIZATION PROBLEMS. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153. https://doi.org/10.2307/256994
dc.relation.referencesDrew, K. (2017). Our Innovation Labs are dead. Long live innovation! UNHCR Innovation. https://www.unhcr.org/innovation/our-innovation-labs-are-dead-long-live-innovation/
dc.relation.referencesDreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1986). Five steps from novice to expert. In Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer (p. 231). Free Press.
dc.relation.referencesDupont, L. (2009). Transfert du génie industriel vers l’ingénierie urbaine : vers une aproche collaborative des projets urbains [Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine - INPL]. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00734950/
dc.relation.referencesDupont, L. (2019). Agile innovation: Creating value in uncertain environments. Journal of Innovation Economics, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.028.0001
dc.relation.referencesDupont, L., Gabriel, A., Camargo, M., & Guidat, C. (2017). Collaborative innovation projects engaging open communities: A case study on emerging challenges. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280002
dc.relation.referencesDupont, L., Guidat, C., Morel, L., & Skiba, N. (2016). The role of mock-ups in the anticipation of the user experience within a living lab: An empirical study. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference, ICE/ITMC 2015, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438669
dc.relation.referencesDupont, L., Mastelic, J., Nyffeler, N., Latrille, S., & Seulliet, E. (2019). Living lab as a support to trust for co-creation of value: application to the consumer energy market. Journal of Innovation Economics, 28(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.028.0053
dc.relation.referencesDupont, L., Morel, L., & Guidat, C. (2015). Innovative public-private partnership to support Smart City: the case of “Chaire REVES.” Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 245– 265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-03-2015-0027
dc.relation.referencesDupont, L., Morel, L., Hubert, J., & Guidat, C. (2014). Study case: Living Lab Mode for urban project design: Emergence of an ad hoc methodology through collaborative innovation. 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2014.6871550
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organization, 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020982866
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
dc.relation.referencesEkvall, G. (1997). Organizational Conditions and Levels of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00070
dc.relation.referencesEllegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
dc.relation.referencesEl-Namaki, M. S. S. (1992). Creating a corporate vision. Long Range Planning, 25(6), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(92)90166-Y
dc.relation.referencesEnjolras, M. (2016). Méthodologie d’analyse de la capacité à innover et à exporter des PME manufacturières et de procédés : identification et caractérisation d’un espace commun en vue de l’élaboration d’un outil multicritères d’aide à la décision [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2016LORR0149
dc.relation.referencesEnjolras, M., Camargo, M., & Schmitt, C. (2020). Evaluating Innovation and Export Capabilities of SMEs: Toward a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 15(3), 17–32. https://173.236.245.237/index.php/GT/article/view/3440
dc.relation.referencesEspinosa, J. M. M., Miranda, J., Cortés, D., Medina, J., & Molina, A. (2020). 3D Virtual Environments to Support New Product Development: A Mobile Platform Based on an Open Innovation Laboratory Applied in Higher Education. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 12015 LNCS (pp. 483–496). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54407-2_41
dc.relation.referencesFecher, F., Winding, J., Hutter, K., & Füller, J. (2020). Innovation labs from a participants’ perspective. Journal of Business Research, 110, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.039
dc.relation.referencesFinocchiaro, L., & Wågø, S. I. (2017). Architectural design and aesthetics of Zero Emission Buildings: An analysis of perceived architectural qualities in the ZEB Living Lab in Trondheim. Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017, 1, 216–223.
dc.relation.referencesFitzpatrick, G., & Malmborg, L. (2018). Quadruple helix model organisation and tensions in participatory design teams. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on HumanComputer Interaction, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240191
dc.relation.referencesFonteijn, R., Roos, M. H., Nguyen, P. H., Morren, J., & Slootweg, J. G. (2018). The Strijp-S living-lab: testing innovative solutions for fault protection, self-healing, congestion management, and voltage control. 2018 53rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2018.8542117
dc.relation.referencesFuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2021.104390
dc.relation.referencesFuller, M. (2017). Fitting squares into round holes: Enabling innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship through corporate Fab labs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2(DS87-2), 407–416. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/39595/Fitting+squares+into+round+holes%3A+Enabling+innovation%2C+creativity%2C+and+entrepreneurship+through+corporate+Fab+Labs
dc.relation.referencesGallegos-Segovia, P. L., Bravo-Torres, J. F., Larios-Rosillo, V. M., Vintimilla-Tapia, P. E.,Yuquilima-Albarado, I. F., Arevalo-Cordero, S. J., Bravo-Torres, J. F., Yuquilima-Albarado, I. F., Larios-Rosillo, V. M., & Arévalo-Cordero, S. J. (2017). Living lab concept for cloud analysis in networks of metropolitan sensors applying the concept of SD-WAN and hybrid networks. 2017 CHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies (CHILECON), 2017-Janua, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHILECON.2017.8229520
dc.relation.referencesGalvez Manriquez, D. (2015). Évaluation de la capacité à innover : une approche par auto évaluation et suivi supporté par des analyses multicritères dynamiques [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2015LORR0018#
dc.relation.referencesGandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: a literature review. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 15(1), 193–205.
dc.relation.referencesGascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003
dc.relation.referencesGehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029
dc.relation.referencesGeist, M. J., Sanders, R., Harris, K., Arce-Trigatti, A., & Hitchcock-Cass, C. (2019). Clinical Immersion: An Approach for Fostering Cross-disciplinary Communication and Innovation in Nursing and Engineering Students. Nurse Educator, 44(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000547
dc.relation.referencesGemünden, H. G., Salomo, S., & Hölzle, K. (2007). Role Models for Radical Innovations in Times of Open Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00451.x
dc.relation.referencesGey, R., Meyer, L. P., & Thieme, M. (2013). A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon Innovation Laboratory: A Structurational Viewpoint. XXIII International RESER Conference, 1–17.
dc.relation.referencesGingstad, K., Jekteberg, Ø., & Balog, K. (2020). ArXivDigest: A Living Lab for Personalized Scientific Literature Recommendation. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 3393–3396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3417417
dc.relation.referencesGiones, F., Kleine, K., & Tegtmeier, S. (2021). Students as scientists’ co-pilots at the onset of technology transfer: a two-way learning process. The Journal of Technology Transfer 2021, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-021-09880-3
dc.relation.referencesGoduscheit, R. C. (2014). Innovation promoters - A multiple case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.020
dc.relation.referencesGoncalves, G. M., Meneses, R., Faria, J. P., & Vidal, R. M. (2020). A living lab for profesional skills development in Software Engineering Management at U.Porto. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2020-April, 1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125099
dc.relation.referencesGratton, L. (1994). Implementing Strategic Intent: Human Resource Processes as a Force for Change. Business Strategy Review, 5(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8616.1994.tb00069.x
dc.relation.referencesGregoire, M. (2016). Exploring various approaches of social innovation: a francophone literature review and a proposal of innovation typology. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p45-71
dc.relation.referencesGREVE, K., LEMINEN, S., de VITA, R., & WESTERLUND, M. (2020). UNVEILING THE DIVERSITY OF SCHOLARLY DEBATE ON LIVING LABS: A BIBLIOMETRIC APPROACH. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(08), 2040003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620400034
dc.relation.referencesGross, E. (1969). The Definition of Organizational Goals. The British Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/588953
dc.relation.referencesGryszkiewicz, L., Lykourentzou, I., & Toivonen, T. (2016). Innovation Labs: Leveraging Openness for Radical Innovation? Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 68–97. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2556692
dc.relation.referencesGünzel, H., Brehm, L., Haak, H.-J., Grönvall, M., & Sainio, A.-M. (2019). DI2 Co-Innovation Lab: Teaching software development in and for real business situations. Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference on ZZZ, 116–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375258.3375273
dc.relation.referencesHabibipour, A., Ståhlbröst, A., Georges, A., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Schuurman, D. (2018). Drop-out in living lab field test: Analysing consequences and some recommendations. 26th European Conference on Information Systems: Beyond Digitization - Facets of SocioTechnical Change, ECIS 2018. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061326020&partnerID=40&md5=15da586a69e94b820681020a92de96d8
dc.relation.referencesHamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (2005, July). Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2005/07/strategic-intent
dc.relation.referencesHart, S. L. (1992). An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279547
dc.relation.referencesHawkins, N., Lewis, J. E., & Robinson, B. S. (2020). Employment of active learning pedagogy throughout a makerspace-based, first-year introduction to engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85095745666&partnerID=40&md5=4c71949ca04b6a8ef6126a85201bf6f4
dc.relation.referencesHellström, T., Jacob, M., & Malmquist, U. (2002). Guiding innovation socially and cognitively: the innovation team model at Skanova Networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060210436745
dc.relation.referencesHenike, T., Kamprath, M., & Hölzle, K. (2019). Effecting, but effective? How business model visualisations unfold cognitive impacts. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101925
dc.relation.referencesHering, D., & Phillips, J. (2005). Innovation Roles The People You Need for Successful Innovation (White Paper).
dc.relation.referencesHerrera, N. R., Davis-Owusu, K., van Oers, S., de Van Der Schueren, M., Alberts, J., & Vastenburg, M. (2018). FoodSampler: Engaging people to contextualise food behaviour: Mixed methods for monitoring choices and triggers of eating habits. Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240948
dc.relation.referencesHerron, J., & Kaneshiro, K. (2017). A University-Wide Collaborative Effort to Designing a Makerspace at an Academic Health Sciences Library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 36(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2017.1259878
dc.relation.referencesHolm, E. J. van. (2015). Makerspaces and Contributions to Entrepreneurship. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.167
dc.relation.referencesHossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257
dc.relation.referencesHowells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
dc.relation.referencesHugo, H., Espinoza, F., Morales, I., Ortiz, E., Pérez, S., & Salcedo, G. (2018). Delta project: Towards a sustainable campus. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10), 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103695
dc.relation.referencesHund, A., Holotiuk, F., Wagner, H.-T., & Beimborn, D. (2020). Knowledge management in the digital era: How digital innovation labs facilitate knowledge recombination. 27th European Conference on Information Systems - Information Systems for a Sharing Society, ECIS 2019. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85087105146&partnerID=40&md5=9db4f82fd613d44870efc50183605dd0
dc.relation.referencesInnov8rs Team. (2017). Innovation Labs: Flying, or Failing? Innova8rs.Co. https://innov8rs.co/news/innovation-labs-flying-failing/
dc.relation.referencesISO. (2019). Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance (ISO Standard No. 56002). https://www.iso.org/standard/68221.html
dc.relation.referencesJenssen, J. I., & Jørgensen, G. (2004). How do Corporate Champions promote innovations? International Journal of Innovation Management, 08(01), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919604000964
dc.relation.referencesJezierski, E., Harvey, J., Hansen, L., Takeuchi, M., Sinha, R., Kieboom, K. M. M., & Edwards, D. (2014). Labcraft: How Social Labs Cultivate Change Through Innovation and Collaboration. Labcraft Publishing. https://www.kl.nl/en/publications/labcraft-innovationlabs-cultivate-change/
dc.relation.referencesJin, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, J. (2020). Efficiency and influencing factors of crowd innovation spaces in China. Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Information Systems (IS) for the Future, PACIS 2020. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089128052&partnerID=40&md5=c6beb47961e4151fb7ca1c201b7d8b5f
dc.relation.referencesJin, Z. R., & Qiu, A. Z. (2019). Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) Testbed as an Integrated Approach for New Mobility - A Living Lab Case Study in Singapore. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 11596 LNCS (pp. 441–458). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22666-4_32
dc.relation.referencesJukema, J. S., Veerman, M., van Alphen, J., Visser, G., Smits, C., & Kingma, T. (2019). Nurturing gerontology students’ intrinsic motivation to cocreate: The design of a powerful learning environment. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 40(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2017.1377702
dc.relation.referencesKaar, C., & Stary, C. (2020). Empowering Makers – A Design Science Approach. 2020 3rd International Conference on Education Technology Management, PartF168981, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446590.3446606
dc.relation.referencesKallio, T. J., Kallio, K.-M., & Blomberg, A. J. (2015). Physical space, culture and organisational creativity – a longitudinal study. Facilities, 33(5/6), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09- 2013-0074
dc.relation.referencesKant, M., & Kanda, W. (2019). Innovation intermediaries: What does it take to survive over time? Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 911–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.04.213
dc.relation.referencesKasmi, F., Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Marche, B., & Camargo, M. (2021). Innovation Spaces as Drivers of Eco-innovations Supporting the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, Prépublication(0), I113-42. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0113
dc.relation.referencesKatzy, B., Turgut, E., Holzmann, T., & Sailer, K. (2013). Innovation intermediaries: A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.764982
dc.relation.referencesKelley, T., & Littman, J. (2005). The ten faces of innovation : IDEO’s strategies for beating the devil’s advocate & driving creativity throughout your organization. Currency/Doubleday.
dc.relation.referencesKieboom, M., van Exel, T., & Sigaloff, C. (2015). Lab Practice: creating spaces for social change. https://www.kl.nl/en/publications/lab-practice-creating-spaces-for-social-change/
dc.relation.referencesKivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006
dc.relation.referencesKlautzer, L., Hong, S. Y., & Narayan, R. (2020). More than a thought experiment -- conceptualizing and implementing an Urban Living Lab. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(3), 032019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032019
dc.relation.referencesKlooker, M., Matzdorf, S., Nicolai, C., Boettcher, L., & Trost, A. (2015). The Importance of Strategic Intent in Developing Innovation Space. ISPIM Innovation Symposium. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), December, 1–19. https://search.proquest.com/openview/aafe571adc2facc4649c96ee12298f3c/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=2040562
dc.relation.referencesKlooker, M., Schwemmle, M., Nicolai, C., & Weinberg, U. (2019). Making Use of Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework of Strategizing Spatial Interventions. In C. Meinel & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research : Looking Further: Design Thinking Beyond Solution-Fixation (pp. 75–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97082-0_5
dc.relation.referencesKnoll Workplace Research. (2013). Creating Collaborative Spaces that Work. https://www.knoll.com/document/1352994554274/CollaborativeWorkplace_wp.pdf
dc.relation.referencesKohtala, C. (2018). Makerspaces as free experimental zones. In M. Charter (Ed.), Designing for the Circular Economy (1st Edition, pp. 260–269). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113067-24
dc.relation.referencesKratzer, J., Leenders, O. T. A. J., & Engelen, J. M. L. van. (2004). Stimulating the Potential: Creative Performance and Communication in Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00294.x
dc.relation.referencesKratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J., & van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006a). Managing creative team performance in virtual environments: an empirical study in 44 R&D teams. Technovation, 26(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.016
dc.relation.referencesKratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J., & van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006b). Team Polarity and Creative Performance in Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00372.x
dc.relation.referencesKristensen, T. (2004). The Physical Context of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.x
dc.relation.referencesLaakso, M., & Clavert, M. (2014). Promover la creatividad y las habilidades del pensamiento de diseño entre los estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 104, 215–228. https://research.aalto.fi/fi/publications/promover-la-creatividad-y-las-habilidades-delpensamiento-de-dise
dc.relation.referencesLacroix, J., Dupont, L., Guidat, C., & Loterr, G. H. (2017). “Smarterized” urban project process with living lab approach: Exploration through a case study. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2018-Janua, 592–600. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279939
dc.relation.referencesLake, D., Fernando, H., & Eardley, D. (2016). The social lab classroom: Wrestling with—and learning from—sustainability challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 12(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2016.11908155
dc.relation.referencesLangley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
dc.relation.referencesle Dinh, T., Ayayi, A., Vu, M. C., & Nomo, T. S. (2018). Managing co-creation rojects: The service-oriented perspective. Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(3), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.19255/jmpm324
dc.relation.referencesLeicher, A. (2017). The rise and death of corporate innovation labs. Hacker Noon. https://hackernoon.com/the-rise-and-death-of-corporate-innovation-labs-6139b9000d40
dc.relation.referencesLeminen, S., Rajahonka, M., & Westerlund, M. (2019). Innovation Mechanism(s) in ThirdGeneration Living Labs: Towards Unification of Collaborative Innovation Networks. ISPIMConference Proceedings, 1–24. https://search.proquest.com/openview/cb5f04c12b7b8fba355bbac3c25a1ff8/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=1796422
dc.relation.referencesLeonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School. http://id.lib.harvard.edu/alma/990060514740203941/catalog
dc.relation.referencesLépine, V., & Martin-Juchat, F. (2020). Enjeux communicationnels des recherches partenariales dans le contexte des open labs. Http://Journals.Openedition.Org/Communiquer, 30, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.4000/COMMUNIQUER.7396
dc.relation.referencesLewis, J. M. (2020). The limits of policy labs: characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077
dc.relation.referencesLewis, M., & Moultrie, J. (2005). The Organizational Innovation Laboratory. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00327.x
dc.relation.referencesLin, Q., & Wong, S. (2017). A study of intellectual property protection for mass innovation spaces. 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), 973–975. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988606
dc.relation.referencesLovas, B., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<875::AIDSMJ126>3.0.CO;2-P
dc.relation.referencesMagadley, W., & Birdi, K. (2009). Innovation labs: An examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00540.x
dc.relation.referencesMaier, A. M., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2012). Assessing Organizational Capabilities: Reviewing and Guiding the Development of Maturity Grids. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2077289
dc.relation.referencesMantere, S., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). Strategic intent as a rhetorical device. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(4), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.03.002
dc.relation.referencesMao, C. (2020). Research on The Application of Blockchain Technology in The Construction and Management of Smart Laboratory. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Technologies and Electrical Engineering, PartF168986, 651–653. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452940.3453067
dc.relation.referencesMarantos, C., Paraskevas, I. S., Siozios, K., Mothe, J., Menou, C., & Soudris, D. (2017). FabSpace 2.0: A platform for application and service development based on Earth Observation data. 2017 6th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MOCAST.2017.7937657
dc.relation.referencesMaravilhas, S., & Martins, J. (2019). Strategic knowledge management in a digital environment: Tacit and explicit knowledge in Fab Labs. Journal of Business Research, 94, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.061
dc.relation.referencesMariadoss, B. J., Johnson, J. L., & Martin, K. D. (2014). Strategic intent and performance: The role of resource allocation decisions. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2393–2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.006
dc.relation.referencesMarkopoulos, E., Aggarwal, V., & Vanharanta, H. (2020). Democratization of Intrapreneurship and Corporate Entrepreneurship Within the McKinsey’s Three Horizons Innovation Space. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1026, pp. 1007–1017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_150
dc.relation.referencesMastelic, J., Emery, L., Previdoli, D., Papilloud, L., Cimmino, F., & Genoud, S. (2018). Energy management in a public building: A case study co-designing the building energy management system. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2018-Janua, 1517–1523. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280062
dc.relation.referencesMburu, S. N., & Thuo, J. K. (2015). Understanding the Concept of Strategic Intent. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(6), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss6.384
dc.relation.referencesMcGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
dc.relation.referencesMcGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2019). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. Public Management Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946
dc.relation.referencesMemon, A. B., & Meyer, K. (2017). Towards the Functional Roles of an Innovation Laboratory as a Platform for Innovation: An Observational Approach. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 8(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.2017010103
dc.relation.referencesMemon, A. B., Meyer, K., Thieme, M., & Meyer, L.-P. (2018). Inter-InnoLab collaboration: An investigation of the diversity and interconnection among Innovation Laboratories. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.11.003
dc.relation.referencesMemon, A. B., Meyer, K., & Tunio, M. N. (2021). Toward collaborative networking among innovation laboratories: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2021-0069
dc.relation.referencesMérindol, V., Bouquin, N., Versailles, D. W., Capdevila, I., Aubouin, N., le Chaffotec, A., Chiovetta, A., & Voisin, T. (2016). Le livre blanc des open labs : Quelles pratiques ? Quels changements en France. Futuris ANRT-NEWPIC. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27107.96806
dc.relation.referencesMérindol, V., Gallié, E. P., & Capdevila, I. (2018). Technology-transfer offices and academic open labs as different types of organizational intermediaries in science-society relationships. Gestion 2000, 35(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.3917/G2000.352.0125
dc.relation.referencesMetzlar, A. (2017). Strategic intent and the strategic position of smallholders: a case study of a smallholders’ organization in the Ghanaian cocoa industry. Review of Social Economy, 75(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2017.1299202
dc.relation.referencesMidwood, A. J., Hannam, K. D., Forge, T. A., Neilsen, D., Emde, D., & Jones, M. D. (2020). Importance of drive-row vegetation for soil carbon storage in woody perennial crops: A regional study. Geoderma, 377, 114591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114591
dc.relation.referencesMiles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://study.sagepub.com/miles3e
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J. (2006). Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (1st ed.). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29841-X
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2
dc.relation.referencesMiranda, J., Chavarria-Barrientos, D., Macias, M., Molina, M., Ponce, P., Molina, A., & Wright, P. K. (2018). Experiences in interactive collaborative learning using an open innovation laboratory: The design methodologies course as case study. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation: Engineering, Technology and Innovation Management Beyond 2020: New Challenges, New Approaches, ICE/ITMC 2017 - Proceedings, 2018-Janua, 1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280021
dc.relation.referencesMochizuki, Y. (2018). Global perspective for data-leveraged smart city initiatives. NEC Technical Journal, 13(1), 14–18. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059419834&partnerID=40&md5=ca17914898f2e7b2d7edf505748c9968
dc.relation.referencesMoilanen, J. (2012). Emerging hackerspaces - Peer-production generation. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 378 AICT, 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_7
dc.relation.referencesMorel, L., Dupont, L., & Boudarel, M.-R. (2018). Innovation spaces: new places for collective intelligence? In D. Uzunidis (Ed.), Collective Innovation Processes (Volume 4, pp. 87–107). Wiley-ISTE. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119557883.ch5
dc.relation.referencesMorse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
dc.relation.referencesMortara, L., & Parisot, N. (2018). How do fab-spaces enable entrepreneurship? Case studies of “makers” - entrepreneurs. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 32(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2018.089465
dc.relation.referencesMortara, L., & Parisot, N. G. (2016). Through entrepreneurs’ eyes: the Fab-spaces constellation. International Journal of Production Research, 54(23), 7158–7180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1198505
dc.relation.referencesMoultrie, J., Clarkson, P. J., & Probert, D. (2006). A tool to evaluate design performance in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(3/4), 184–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610653192
dc.relation.referencesMoultrie, J., Clarkson, P. J., & Probert, D. (2007). Development of a design audit tool for SMEs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 335–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00255.x
dc.relation.referencesMoultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U.-E., Janssen, S., & van der Lugt, R. (2007). Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Role of the Physical Environment in Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x
dc.relation.referencesMoya Sedan, C. A. (2021). Développement de la capacité à open innover des fournisseurs [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2021LORR0006
dc.relation.referencesMulder, M. (2014). Conceptions of Professional Competence. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning (pp. 107–137). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_5
dc.relation.referencesNilsson, W., Bonnici, F., & Griffin EL, E. W. (2015). The social innovation lab: An experiment in the pedagogy of institutional work. In The Business of Social and Environmental Innovation: New Frontiers in Africa (pp. 201–212). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04051-6_11
dc.relation.referencesNur Rahma Putra, A. B., Mukhadis, A., Poerwanto, E. E., Irdianto, W., & Sembiring, A. I. (2018). Edmodo-Based Makerspace as E-Learning Technology to Improve the Management Project of Vocational Students in the Disruptive Technology Era. 2018 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIET.2018.8693224
dc.relation.referencesNyström, A.-G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Kortelainen, M. (2014). Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.016
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2018). Digital Government Review of Colombia: Towards a Citizen-Driven Public Sector. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264291867-en
dc.relation.referencesOksanen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2013). Physical environment as a source for innovation: investigating the attributes of innovative space. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2013-0136
dc.relation.referencesOladele-Emmanuel, B. D., Rejeb, H. ben, & Redlich, T. (2018). Strategic Management: SWOT Analysis of the African Digital Fabrication Laboratories. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436269
dc.relation.referencesOldenburg, R. (2001). Celebrating the third place: Inspiring stories about the great good places at the heart of our communities. Da Capo Press.
dc.relation.referencesOliva, F. L., & Kotabe, M. (2019). Barriers, practices, methods and knowledge management tools in startups. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1838–1856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0361
dc.relation.referencesOlson, E. M., Cooper, R., & Slater, S. F. (1998). Design strategy and competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 41(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(98)90035-0
dc.relation.referencesOrlikowski, W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use. Organization Science, 6(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.423
dc.relation.referencesO’Shannassy, T. F. (2016). Strategic intent: The literature, the construct and its role in predicting organization performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(5), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.46
dc.relation.referencesOsorio Bustamante, F. (2015). Analysis of characteristics and types of infrastructure of innovation laboratories: implications for strategic management. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/59004
dc.relation.referencesOsorio Bustamante, F., Pena Reyes, J. I., Camargo, M., & Dupont, L. (2016). Spaces to Foster and sustain innovation: Towards a conceptual framework. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438661
dc.relation.referencesOsorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12301
dc.relation.referencesOsorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Pena, J. I. (2019). Constellation of Innovation Laboratories: A Scientific Outlook. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2019.8792816
dc.relation.referencesOsorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Peña, J. I. (2021). Making the strategic intent of innovation labs operational: A process perspective on the case of the Lorraine Fab Living Lab. R&D Management Conference 2021 Innovation in an Era of Disruption, 1–13. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03285670
dc.relation.referencesOsorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Sandoval, C., & Peña, J. I. (2020). Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogota: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, n°31(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0066
dc.relation.referencesPaje, R. C., Boco, L. B., Gloria, J. C. A., & Go, H. A. R. (2020). The Effect of Workplace Design on Employee Engagement, Collaborative Capability, and on Perceived Work Performance in Coworking Spaces. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(3), 032063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/3/032063
dc.relation.referencesPancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2015). Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces: insights from European best practices. Int. J. Knowledge-Based Development, 6(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2015.072823
dc.relation.referencesPapadopoulou, C.-A., & Hatzichristos, T. (2020). Allocation of Residential Areas in Smart Insular Communities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 9(4), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2020100103
dc.relation.referencesPatterson, B., Casucci, T., Hull, B. E., & Lombardo, N. T. (2018). Library as the Technology Hub for the Health Sciences. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 37(4), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2018.1514899
dc.relation.referencesPatterson, M. G., Godon, C. H., Segan, L. D., & Mannickarottu, S. (2020). Under the hood of a bio-makerspace: Automating lab operations. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June.
dc.relation.referencesPearce II, J. A. (1982). The Company Mission As a Strategic Tool: What Is - ProQuest. Sloan Management Review (Pre-1986), 23(3). https://www.proquest.com/docview/206766548
dc.relation.referencesPeña-Reyes, J.-I. (2010). E-learning en communautés isolées : le double isolement de l’apprenant [Grenoble]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2010GRENG002
dc.relation.referencesPerianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
dc.relation.referencesPeschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012). Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 9(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1386/jots.9.1.41_1
dc.relation.referencesPeschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014). Designing and Enabling Spaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation: From managing to enabling innovation as socioepistemological technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.027
dc.relation.referencesPetersen, I. haam, & Kruss, G. (2021). Universities as change agents in resource-poor local settings: An empirically grounded typology of engagement models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120693
dc.relation.referencesPham, T. v., Nguyen, A. T. T., Ngo, T. D., Le, D. H., Le, K. C. V., Nguyen, T. H. N., & Le, H. Q. (2020). Proposed Smart University Model as a Sustainable Living Lab for University Digital Transformation. 2020 5th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1109/GTSD50082.2020.9303086
dc.relation.referencesPitt, M. (2001). In pursuit of change: managerial constructions of strategic intent. Strategic Change, 10(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.528
dc.relation.referencesPittaway, L., Aissaoui, R., Ferrier, M., & Mass, P. (2019). University spaces for entrepreneurship: a process model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 911–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2018-0584
dc.relation.referencesPodmetina, D., Hafkesbrink, J., Teplov, R., Dabrowska, J., & Petraite, M. (2015). What Skills and Competences are required to Implement Open Innovation? ISPIM Conference Proceedings, June, 1–20. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1780140077/fulltext/11860BF316DB4B68PQ/1?accountid=14211
dc.relation.referencesPodmetina, D., Soderquist, K. E., Petraite, M., & Teplov, R. (2018). Developing a competency model for open innovation: From the individual to the organisational level. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0445
dc.relation.referencesPolderman, A., Haller, A., Viesi, D., Tabin, X., Sala, S., Giorgi, A., Darmayan, L., Rager, J., Vidovič, J., Daragon, Q., Verchère, Y., Zupan, U., Houbé, N., Heinrich, K., Bender, O., & Bidault, Y. (2020). How Can Ski Resorts Get Smart? Transdisciplinary Approaches to Sustainable Winter Tourism in the European Alps. Sustainability, 12(14), 5593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145593
dc.relation.referencesPonsard, C., Nihoul, B., & Touzani, M. (2019). Software eco-design for sustainable systems: Experience feedback in mobility and forest management [Éco-conception logicielle pour systèmes durables: Retours d’expérience en matière de mobilité et de gestion forestière]. 37th INFORSID 2019 - INFormatique Des ORganisations et Systemes d’Information et de Decision, 115–130.
dc.relation.referencesPrahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. (1987). The Multinational Mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.
dc.relation.referencesProvenzano, V., Seminara, M. R., & Arnone, M. (2020). Sustainable Development and Transition Management: A New Approach for European Peripheral Areas. In Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies: Vol. 177 SIST (pp. 37–46). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52869-0_4
dc.relation.referencesPuttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). i-Teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/i-teamsthe-teams-and-funds-making-innovation-happen-in-governments-around-the-world/
dc.relation.referencesQuintane, E., Mitch Casselman, R., Sebastian Reiche, B., & Nylund, P. A. (2011). Innovation as a knowledge‐based outcome. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 928–947. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179299
dc.relation.referencesRaabe, J.-P., Horlach, B., Drews, P., & Schirmer, I. (2020). Digital innovation units: Exploring types, linking mechanisms and evolution strategies in bimodal it setups. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Business Information Systems 2020 “Developments, Opportunities and Challenges of Digitization”, WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 2020. https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_h5
dc.relation.referencesRayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2019). Open social innovation dynamics and impact: exploratory study of a fab lab network. R and D Management, 49(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12376
dc.relation.referencesRayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2021). Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120391
dc.relation.referencesRezaee Vessal, S., Partouche-Sebban, J., Scuotto, V., & Maalaoui, A. (2021). Overcoming stressful life events at do-it-yourself (DIY) laboratories. A new trailblazing career for disadvantaged entrepreneurs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120506
dc.relation.referencesRieken, F., Boehm, T., Heinzen, M., & Meboldt, M. (2019). Corporate makerspaces as innovation driver in companies: a literature review-based framework. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0098
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, E. B., & Fusfeld, A. R. (1982). Critical functions: Needed roles in the innovation process. In R. Kats (Ed.), Carrer issues in human resource management (pp. 182–207). Prentice-Hall. https://books.google.fr/books/about/Career_issues_in_human_resource_manageme.html?id=4CYUAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
dc.relation.referencesRose, R., Groeger, L., & Hölzle, K. (2021). The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685167
dc.relation.referencesRoux-Marchand, T., Cruz, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Osorio, F. (2020). Connecting the strategic intent of innovation labs and projects: the case of the Green Fablab. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198320
dc.relation.referencesRuijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2020). Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884
dc.relation.referencesSandberg, J. (2000). Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556383
dc.relation.referencesSandiford, P. J. (2019). The Third Place as an Evolving Concept for Hospitality Researchers and Managers. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 43(7), 1092–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019855687
dc.relation.referencesSandoval-Almazan, R., & Valle-Cruz, D. (2017). Open innovation, living labs and public officials: The case of “mapaton” in Mexico. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047308
dc.relation.referencesSangiorgi, D., Lucchi, F., & Carrera, M. (2020). Co-designing Innovation Labs as Engines for Mental Healthcare Ecosystem Transformation (pp. 209–223). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_15
dc.relation.referencesSantarsiero, F., Lerro, A., Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2021). Modelling and managing innovation lab as catalyst of digital transformation: theoretical and empirical evidence. Measuring Business Excellence, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE11-2020-0152
dc.relation.referencesSchaeffer, J. A. (2017). Already There? Cultivating Emergent Places for Radical Innovation in Operations. In International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Vol. 255, pp. 131–149). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55985-8_8
dc.relation.referencesSchmitt, U. (2017). Devising enabling spaces and affordances for personal knowledge management system design. Informing Science, 20, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.28945/3743
dc.relation.referencesSchuurman, D., Baccarne, B., Kawsar, F., Seys, C., Veeckman, C., de Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2013). Living labs as quasi-experiments: results from the Flemish LeYLab. XXIV ISPIM Conference : Innovating in Global Markets: Challenges for Sustainable Growth, 1–15. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/3237435/file/3237445.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSchuurman, D., Marez, L. de, & Ballon, P. (2013). Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(1). http://timreview.ca/article/743
dc.relation.referencesSchuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2016). Innovation in the public sector : exploring the characteristics and potential of living labs and innovation labs. Proceedings of the OpenLivingLab Days 2016, Montreal, Canada, 78–90. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU8532627
dc.relation.referencesSearle, J. R. (1979). What Is an Intentional State? Mind, 88(349), 74–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2253065 Seo, E., Bae, S., Choi, H., & Choi, D. (2020). Preference and usability of Smart-Home services and items - A Focus on the Smart-Home living-lab –. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1812397
dc.relation.referencesSeo, J., Lysiankova, L., Ock, Y.-S. Y.-S., & Chun, D. (2017). Priorities of coworking space operation based on comparison of the hosts and users’ perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8), 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081494
dc.relation.referencesServaty, R., Perger, G., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2018). Working in a cocoon: (Co)working conditions of office nomads - a health related qualitative study of shared working environments. Work, 60(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182760
dc.relation.referencesSharp, D., & Salter, R. (2017). Direct impacts of an urban living lab from the participants’ perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10), 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101699
dc.relation.referencesSheehan Jr., R. M. (1999). Achieving Growth and High Quality by Strategic Intent. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.9406
dc.relation.referencesSiekkinen, T., Pekkola, E., & Carvalho, T. (2020). Change and continuity in the academic profession: Finnish universities as living labs. Higher Education, 79(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00422-3
dc.relation.referencesSillince, J. A. A. (1999). The Role of Political Language Forms and Language Coherence in the Organizational Change Process. Organization Studies, 20(3), 485–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699203005
dc.relation.referencesSinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341
dc.relation.referencesSittoni, L., van Eekelen, E. M. M., van der Goot, F., & Nieboer, H. E. (2019). The Living Lab for mud: Integrated sediment management based on building with nature concepts. 22nd World Dredging Congress, WODCON 2019, 847–856. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071455613&partnerID=40&md5=3d815b9f92cba0ad7770e5e6d453c6ef
dc.relation.referencesSkiba, N., Dupont, L., Morel, L., & Guidat, C. (2012). A space for innovation process acceleration, supporting collaborative citizens workshops. 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2012.6297646
dc.relation.referencesSmith, C. E. (1994). The Merlin Factor: Leadership and Strategic Intent. Business Strategy Review, 5(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.1994.tb00070.x
dc.relation.referencesSnead, L., & Wycoff, J. (1999). TOOLS@ WORK: Stimulating innovation with collaboration rooms. Journal for Quality and Participation, 55–57.
dc.relation.referencesSong, R., Clemon, L., & Telenko, C. (2019). Uncertainty and Variability of Energy and Material Use by Fused Deposition Modeling Printers in Makerspaces. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(3), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12772
dc.relation.referencesSoomro, S. A., & Georgiev, G. v. (2020). A FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE DIGITAL FABRICATION PROJECTS: THE ROLE OF DESIGN CREATIVITY. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2020), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.35199/ICDC.2020.46
dc.relation.referencesSroufe, R. (2020). Business Schools as Living Labs: Advancing Sustainability in Management Education. Journal of Management Education, 44(6), 726–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920951590
dc.relation.referencesStercken, A. A. M. (2015). Cultivating Serendipity and Efficacy Beliefs: The Impact of (Caireen) Innovation Spaces on Human Development. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/305357
dc.relation.referencesStickel, O., Stilz, M., Brocker, A., Borchers, J., & Pipek, V. (2019). Fab:UNIverse - Makerspaces, Fab Labs and Lab Managers in Academia. Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference on ZZZ - FabLearn Europe ’19, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335074
dc.relation.referencesSusman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392581
dc.relation.referencesTaber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
dc.relation.referencesTasca, R., Ventura, I. L. S., Borges, V., Leles, F. A. G., Gomes, R. de M., Ribas, A. N., Carvalho, W. M., & Jimenez, J. M. S. (2019). Laboratórios de inovação em saúde: por uma Atenção Primária à Saúde forte no Distrito Federal, Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 24(6), 2021– 2030. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018246.08672019
dc.relation.referencesTen, I., Arbelaez-Garces, G., & Dupont, L. (2020). Designing interactive museum visitors’ experience using a Fab Living Lab platform: The Museum-Aquarium of Nancy case. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2020, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198641
dc.relation.referencesTimeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049
dc.relation.referencesTimmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Wesselink, R., & Nielsen, R. Ø. (2020). Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: the case of responsable research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751
dc.relation.referencesTõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939
dc.relation.referencesTURILLAZZI, B., LEONI, G., GASPARI, J., IADANZA, E., MY, M., MASSARI, M., BOULANGER, S. O. M., & DJALALI, A. (2020). HERITAGE-LED ONTOLOGIES: DIGITAL PLATFORM FOR SUPPORTING THE REGENERATION OF CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL SITES. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 249, 307–318. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC200261
dc.relation.referencesValencia, M., Villacreses, S., Benitez, D. S., Velasco, A., & Ochoa-Herrera, V. (2018). Towards a Sustainable Energy-Efficient Future at Universities, Universidad San Francisco de Quito Case Study, Phase I. 2018 IEEE ANDESCON, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON.2018.8564629
dc.relation.referencesvan Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
dc.relation.referencesvan Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & van Waveren, B. (2003). Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 07(03), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000817
dc.relation.referencesVasilescu, M. D., & Ionel, I. (2017). 3D Printer FABLAB for Students at POLITEHNICA University Timisoara. 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 512–513. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.106
dc.relation.referencesVeeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748
dc.relation.referencesVickers, M. (2005). Action research to improve the human condition: An insider-outsider and a multi-methodology design for actionable knowledge outcomes. International Journal of Action Research, 1(2), 190–218. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/37009
dc.relation.referencesvon Hippel, E. A. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=712763
dc.relation.referencesWagner, J., & Watch, D. (2017). Innovation spaces: The new design of work. https://www.brookings.edu/research/innovation-spaces-the-new-design-of-work/
dc.relation.referencesWang, S.-M. S., & Yeh, P. C. (2018). Smart space and service management with IoT architecture - An application in educational context. 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3), 221–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.00-18
dc.relation.referencesWard, M., Gruppen, L., & Regehr, G. (2002). Measuring self-assessment: Current state of the art. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014585522084
dc.relation.referencesWascher, E., Hebel, F., Schrot, K., & Schultze, J. (2018). Social Innovation Labs - A starting point for social innovation. https://kommunen-innovativ.de/sites/default/files/kosilab_report_social_innovation_labs_final.pdf
dc.relation.referencesWascher, E., Kaletka, C., & Schultze, J. (2019). Social Innovation Labs - A Seedbed for Social Innovation. In Atlas of social innovation: 2nd volume - A world of new practices (pp. 136–138). https://www.socialinnovationatlas.net/articles/
dc.relation.referencesWeick, K. E. (1977). Laboratory Experimentation with Organizations: A Reappraisal. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409180
dc.relation.referencesWestley, F., Laban, S., Rose, C., McGowan, K., Robinson, K., Tjornbo, O., & Tovey, M. (2015). Social Innovation Lab Guide. https://uwaterloo.ca/waterloo-institute-for-social-innovationand-resilience/projects/social-innovation-lab-guide
dc.relation.referencesWettergreen, M. A., Saterbak, A., Kavalewitz, A. J., Nunez-Thompson, A. M., Leautaud, V.,Mkandawire, T., Petney, M., dos Santos, C. A., & Oden, Z. M. (2020). Makerspaces in low-, middle-, and high-income countries to support student development of engineering design skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 1234–1251.
dc.relation.referencesWilson, I. (1992). Realizing the power of strategic vision. Long Range Planning, 25(5), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(92)90271-3
dc.relation.referencesWoodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517
dc.relation.referencesWoods, R., & Berker, T. (2019). Living labs in a zero emission neighbourhood context. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 352(1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012004
dc.relation.referencesXU, L., HU, W., & GUAN, X. (2018). Evaluation of the Efficiency of Chinese Makerspace Operation Based on Double-creation Background. 2018 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), 2018-August, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2018.8745260
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (L. Bickman & D. J. Rog, Eds.; 4th ed., Vol. 5). SAGE.
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: design and methods (Sixth). Sage publications. https://www.sagepub.com/hi/nam/case-study-research-andapplications/book250150
dc.relation.referencesYou, W., Chen, W., Agyapong, M., & Mordi, C. (2020). The business model of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) laboratories – A triple-layered perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120205
dc.relation.referencesZamiri, M., Marcelino-Jesus, E., Calado, J., Sarraipa, J., & Goncalves, R. J. (2019). Knowledge Management in Research Collaboration Networks. 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948162
dc.relation.referencesZenk, L., Hynek, N., Krawinkler, S. A., Peschl, M. F., & Schreder, G. (2021). Supporting innovation processes using material artefacts: Comparing the use of LEGO bricks and moderation cards as boundary objects. Creativity and Innovation Management, caim.12459. https://doi.org/10.1111/CAIM.12459
dc.relation.referencesZivkovic, S. (2018). Systemic innovation labs: a lab for wicked problems. Social Enterprise Journal, 14(3), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-04-2018-0036
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalInnovation lab
dc.subject.proposalStrategic intent
dc.subject.proposalStrategic management
dc.subject.proposalMulti-case study
dc.subject.proposalAction research
dc.subject.proposalAssessment
dc.subject.proposalLaboratorio de innovación
dc.subject.proposalIntención estratégica
dc.subject.proposalGestión estratégica
dc.subject.proposalEstudio de casos múltiples
dc.subject.proposalInvestigación-acción
dc.subject.proposalEvaluación
dc.subject.proposalLaboratoire d'innovation
dc.subject.proposalIntention stratégique
dc.subject.proposalGestion stratégique
dc.subject.proposalÉtude de cas multiples
dc.subject.proposalRecherche-action
dc.subject.proposalÉvaluation
dc.subject.unescoLaboratorio de investigación
dc.subject.unescoResearch laboratories
dc.subject.unescoInstalación científica
dc.subject.unescoCentro de investigación
dc.title.translatedGestion des laboratoires d’innovation : Une approche méthodologique pour la conception de l’intention stratégique
dc.title.translatedGestión de laboratorios de innovación: Un enfoque metodológico orientado al diseño de la intención estratégica
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
1098655581.2021.pdf
Tamaño:
8.124Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería ...
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito