Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorMendoza Pulido, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Ramirez, Sebastián Camilo
dc.contributor.authorRosas Jaimes, Jaime Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-28T13:31:24Z
dc.date.available2022-07-28T13:31:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81756
dc.descriptionilustraciones, graficas
dc.description.abstractEn el presente trabajo de investigación se describen las características (valores de referencia, exactitud diagnóstica y correlaciones con otras pruebas electrofisiológicas) de la respuesta electrofisiológica conocida como potencial premotor del nervio mediano registrado en el segundo lumbrical (PMP-2L), se realizó un estudio descriptivo observacional transversal en pacientes remitidos al laboratorio de electrofisiología clínica de un centro de referencia de la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia (Centro De Investigación En Fisiatría y Electrodiagnóstico CIFEL) para confirmación electrofisiológica de síndrome de túnel del carpo (STC); Durante 8 meses se recolectó una muestra total de 190 pacientes, al realizar el análisis de correlación de la clasificación de Rempel con el PMP-2L no se demostró correlación posterior al análisis post hoc, por otro lado se encontró una asociación débil y positiva con el Factor 2 del Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (F2- BCTQ), al realizar la correlación del PMP-2L y las pruebas convencionales para evaluación del nervio mediano se encontraron correlaciones positivas con significancia estadística, al realizar la evaluación de promedios del PMP-2L según los grupos Padua, posterior a un análisis posthoc se demostró diferencias significativas en el grupo Padua 0 y los demás grupos (p<0.01). Se usaron 3 definiciones operativas al momento de definir valores de corte de latencia y amplitud del PMP-2L (Padua 0, Padua 0 y Rempel> 1; Padua 0 y CSI<1.0) con resultados de latencia en 1.8ms y 1.9ms; y de límite inferior amplitud del PMP-2L en 29.6 uV, 29.7uV y 30.6uV. Se logró describir las características de la respuesta electrofisiológica PMP-2L en población colombiana con sospecha clínica de STC, dentro de ellos los límites de normalidad para amplitud y latencia al inicio del potencial, y correlaciones con las pruebas electrofisiológicas más usadas en la práctica de electrofisiología del Departamento de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación de la Universidad Nacional. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractThis research paper describes the characteristics (reference values, diagnostic accuracy and correlations with other electrophysiological tests) of the electrophysiological response known as median nerve premotor potential recorded in the second lumbrical (PMP-2L).A cross-sectional observational descriptive study was performed in patients referred to the clinical electrophysiology laboratory of a reference center in the city of Bogota, Colombia (Centro De Investigación en Fisiatría y Electrodiagnóstico CIFEL) for electrophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); A total sample of 190 patients was collected for 8 months, a correlation analysis of the Rempel classification with the PMP-2L was performed, and no correlation was demonstrated after a post hoc analysis, at the same time we found a weak and positive association with Factor 2 of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (F2-BCTQ) , besides performing the correlation of the PMP-2L and conventional tests for evaluation of the median nerve were we found positive correlations with statistical significance. When evaluating averages of PMP-2L according to the Padua groups, after post-hoc analysis, significant differences were demonstrated in the Padua 0 group and the other groups (p<0.01). Three operational definitions were used when defining PMP-2L latency and amplitude cut-off values (Padua 0, Padua 0, and Rempel> 1; Padua 0 and CSI<1.0) with cut off values for onset latency in 1.8ms and 1.9ms; and lower limit for PMP-2L amplitude 29.6 uV, 29.7uV and 30.6uV. In this study we describe the characteristics of the electrophysiological response PMP-2L in Colombian population with clinical suspicion of STC, within them the normal limits for amplitude and onset, and correlations with the electrophysiological tests most used in the electrophysiology practice of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of the National University.
dc.format.extent57 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::616 - Enfermedades
dc.subject.otherSíndrome del Túnel Carpiano
dc.subject.otherCarpal Tunnel Syndrome
dc.subject.otherElectrodiagnóstico
dc.subject.otherElectrodiagnosis
dc.titlePotencial premotor del nervio mediano registrado en el segundo lumbrical y su evolución natural en pacientes con síndrome del túnel del carpo
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médica
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicas
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación
dc.description.researchareaCIFEL
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Medicina Física y Rehabilitacion
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicina
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.indexedRedCol
dc.relation.indexedLaReferencia
dc.relation.references1. Padua, L., Coraci, D., Erra, C., Pazzaglia, C., Paolasso, I., Loreti, C., Caliandro, P., & Hobson-Webb, L. D. (2016). Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet. Neurology, 15(12), 1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9
dc.relation.references2. Bland, J. D., & Rudolfer, S. M. (2003). Clinical surveillance of carpal tunnel syndrome in two areas of the United Kingdom, 1991-2001. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 74(12), 1674–1679. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.12.1674
dc.relation.references3. Doughty, C. T., & Bowley, M. P. (2019). Entrapment Neuropathies of the Upper Extremity. The Medical clinics of North America, 103(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2018.10.012
dc.relation.references4. Aizenberg D. J. (2021). Common Complaints of the Hands and Feet. The Medical clinics of North America, 105(1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.016
dc.relation.references5. Rempel, D., Evanoff, B., Amadio, P. C., de Krom, M., Franklin, G., Franzblau, A., Gray, R., Gerr, F., Hagberg, M., Hales, T., Katz, J. N., & Pransky, G. (1998). Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. American journal of public health, 88(10), 1447–1451.
dc.relation.references6. Calfee, R. P., Dale, A. M., Ryan, D., Descatha, A., Franzblau, A., & Evanoff, B. (2012). Performance of simplified scoring systems for hand diagrams in carpal tunnel syndrome screening.
dc.relation.references7. Oteo-Álvaro, Á., Marín, M. T., Matas, J. A., & Vaquero, J. (2016). Validación al castellano de la escala Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire [Spanish validation of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire]. Medicina clinica, 146(6), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2015.10.013
dc.relation.references8. Ortiz-Corredor, F., Calambas, N., Mendoza-Pulido, C., Galeano, J., Díaz-Ruíz, J., & Delgado, O. (2011). Factor analysis of carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire in relation to nerve conduction studies. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(10), 2067–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.030
dc.relation.references9. Zivkovic, S., Gruener, G., Arnold, M., Winter, C., Nuckols, T., Narayanaswami, P., & the Quality Improvement Committee of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (2020). Quality measures in electrodiagnosis: Carpal tunnel syndrome-An AANEM Quality Measure Set. Muscle & nerve, 61(4), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26810
dc.relation.references10. Padua, L., Padua, R., Lo Monaco, M., Aprile, I., Paciello, N., Nazzaro, M., & Tonali, P. (1998). Natural history of carpal tunnel syndrome according to the neurophysiological classification. Italian journal of neurological sciences, 19(6), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02341782
dc.relation.references11. Bland J. D. (2000). A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle & nerve, 23(8), 1280–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:8<1280: aid-mus20>3.0.co;2-y
dc.relation.references12. Stevens J. C. (1997). AAEM minimonograph #26: the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle & nerve, 20(12), 1477–1486. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199712)20:12<1477: aid-mus1>3.0.co;2-5
dc.relation.references13. Ortiz-Corredor, Fernando, & López-Monsalve, Ángela. (2009). Aproximación a valores de referencia de estudios electrofisiológicos para el diagnóstico de Síndrome de Túnel del Carpo. Revista de Salud Pública, 11(5), 794-801. Retrieved April 18 2021, from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0124-00642009000500012&lng=en&tlng=es.
dc.relation.references14. Dumitru, D., Walsh, N. E., & Ramamurthy, S. (1989). The premotor potential. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 70(7), 537–540.
dc.relation.references15. Takahashi, N., Takahashi, O., Ogawa, S., & Takahashi, M. (2006). What is the origin of the premotor potential recorded from the second lumbrical? Muscle & nerve, 34(6), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20606
dc.relation.references16. Masakado, Y., Kodama, M., Takahashi, O., Sasao, Y., Kasahara, T., Hyodo, M., Hanayama, K., & Fujita, Y. (2011). The origin of the premotor potential recorded from the second lumbrical muscle in normal man. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(10), 2089–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.037
dc.relation.references17. Therimadasamy, A. K., Li, E., & Wilder-Smith, E. P. (2007). Can studies of the second lumbrical interossei and its premotor potential reduce the number of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome? Muscle & nerve, 36(4), 491–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20850
dc.relation.references18. Kodama, M., Sasao, Y., Tochikura, M., Kasahara, T., Koyama, Y., Aono, K., Fujii, C., Hanayama, K., Takahashi, O., Kobayashi, Y., & Masakado, Y. (2012). Premotor potential study in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle & nerve, 46(6), 879–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23424
dc.relation.references19. Kodama, M., Tochikura, M., Shimoda, N., Fujii, C., Fujiwara, T., & Masakado, Y. (2016). Premotor Potential Study for Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine, 41(2), 101–107.
dc.relation.references20. Preston, D. C., & Logigian, E. L. (1992). Lumbrical and interossei recording in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle & nerve, 15(11), 1253–1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880151106
dc.relation.references21. Jabre, J. F., Pitt, M. C., Deeb, J., & Chui, K. K. (2015). E-norms: a method to extrapolate reference values from a laboratory population. Journal of clinical neurophysiology: official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 32(3), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000161
dc.relation.references22. Robinson, L. R., Micklesen, P. J., & Wang, L. (2000). Optimizing the number of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle & nerve, 23(12), 1880–1882. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4598(200012)23:12<1880::aid-mus14>3.0.co;2-a
dc.relation.references23. Chan L, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Levenson LM, Hollingworth W, Heagerty PJ, Kliot M, Jarvik JG. The relationship between electrodiagnostic findings and patient symptoms and function in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;88(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.013.
dc.relation.references24. Gürsoy AE, Kolukısa M, Yıldız GB, Kocaman G, Celebi A, Koçer A. Relationship between electrodiagnostic severity and neuropathic pain assessed by the LANSS pain scale in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013; 9:65-71. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S38513.
dc.relation.references25. Lew, H. L., Date, E. S., Pan, S. S., Wu, P., Ware, P. F., & Kingery, W. S. (2005). Sensitivity, specificity, and variability of nerve conduction velocity measurements in carpal tunnel syndrome. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 86(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.023
dc.relation.references26. Kasius, K. M., Claes, F., Meulstee, J., Weinstein, H. C., & Verhagen, W. I. (2014). Comparison of peak versus onset latency measurements in electrodiagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of clinical neurophysiology: official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 31(4), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000069
dc.relation.references27. Kodama, M., Tochikura, M., Sasao, Y., Kasahara, T., Koyama, Y., Aono, K., Fujii, C., Shimoda, N., Kurihara, Y., & Masakado, Y. (2014). What is the most sensitive test for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome? The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine, 39(4), 172–177.
dc.relation.references28. Zeidman, L. A., Singh, S. K., & Pandey, D. K. (2014). Higher diagnostic yield with the combined sensory index in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of clinical neuromuscular disease, 15(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/CND.0000000000000037
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalPotencial premotor
dc.subject.proposalElectrodiagnóstico
dc.subject.proposalSíndrome de túnel del carpo
dc.subject.proposalPremotor action potential
dc.subject.proposalElectrodiagnosis
dc.subject.proposalCarpal Tunnel Syndrome
dc.title.translatedPremotor potential of the median nerve recorded in the second lumbrical and its natural history in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito