Mostrar registro simples

Adopción de tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en proyectos de gobierno electrónico colombianos: Factores habilitantes e inhibidores

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorSánchez Torres, Jenny Marcela
dc.contributor.advisorCardona Román, Diana Marcela
dc.contributor.authorBorja Acosta, Joshep Stevens
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-31T20:45:45Z
dc.date.available2022-08-31T20:45:45Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82228
dc.descriptionilustraciones, graficas
dc.description.abstractEn esta tesis de investigación se identificó un problema que apunta a la dificultad de la toma de decisiones claras y con sustento para la adopción de TIC en proyectos de gobierno electrónico, por lo que el propósito de esta investigación se enfoca en proponer un grupo de factores habilitantes e inhibidores que puedan apoyar la adopción de TIC en proyectos de gobierno electrónico en Colombia. Para identificarlos y proponerlos, se utilizó una metodología de tipo secuencial mixta exploratoria compuesta por tres fases 1. Revision de literatura; 2. Validación con usuarios; 3. Validación con expertos. Dando como resultados en cada fase: Primero, luego de una revisión sistemática de literatura 32 factores habilitantes y 29 factores inhibidores para la adopción de TIC en proyectos de gobierno electrónico. Segundo, se examinó la presencia de estos factores, desde el punto de vista de las necesidades y requisitos de usuarios en un proyecto de gobierno electrónico colombiano. Tercero, se verificó la correcta definición, la pertinencia y el impacto de los factores para la adopción de TIC; apoyado en el juicio de expertos en un proyecto de gobierno electrónico colombiano. Como principal conclusión, se tiene que los factores identificados permiten realizar un análisis pertinente para adoptar tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones (TIC) en proyectos de gobierno electrónico. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractIn this research thesis, a problem was identified, which leads to the difficulty of making clear and supported decisions to adopt ICT in electronic government projects. This research focuses on proposing a group of factors that enable or inhibit decision-making in electronic government projects in Colombia. An exploratory mixed sequential methodology was used to identify and propose these factors, the methodology include three phases: 1) Literature Review, 2) Users validation, and 3) Experts validation. Giving the following results in each phase: First, after a systematic literature review, 32 enabling factors and 29 inhibiting factors were found to adopt ICT in electronic government projects. Second, these factors were examined throughout the needs and requirements of users in a Colombian electronic government project. Third, supported by expert judgment in a Colombian electronic government project, the definition, relevance, and impact of these factors for ICT adoption were verified. The main conclusion suggests that the identified factors allow a pertinent analysis to be carried out to adopt information and communication technologies (ICT) in electronic government projects.
dc.format.extentxv, 112 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc320 - Ciencia política (política y gobierno)::321 - Sistemas de gobiernos y de estados
dc.titleAdopción de tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en proyectos de gobierno electrónico colombianos: Factores habilitantes e inhibidores
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrial
dc.contributor.researchgroupGriego (Grupo Investigación en Gestión y Organizaciones)
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrial
dc.description.methodsMetodología de tipo secuencial mixta exploratoria compuesta por tres fases: 1. Revisión de literatura; 2. Validación con usuarios; 3. Validación con expertos.
dc.description.researchareaGestión de la innovación
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.indexedRedCol
dc.relation.indexedLaReferencia
dc.relation.referencesD. Comin and B. Hobijn, “An Exploration of Technology Diffusion,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 100, no. 1997, pp. 2031–2059, 2008, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1116606.
dc.relation.referencesS. Sieber and J. Valor, “Criterios de adopción de las tecnologías de información y comunicación,” PricewaterhouseCoopers IESE, p. 58, 2008.
dc.relation.referencesM. C. de Guzman and M. A. Jones, “E-Policing: Environmental and organizational correlates of website features and characteristics among large police departments in the united states of america,” Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 64–82, 2012, doi: 10.4018/jegr.2012010103.
dc.relation.referencesG. Puron-cid, G. Puron-cid, D. Carolina, and V. Tello, “Inter-temporal analysis of e-government enactment : the cases of Mexico and Colombia Inter-temporal Analysis of e-Government Enactment : The cases of Mexico and Colombia,” Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Theory Pract. Electron. Gov., no. January, pp. 28–31, 2016, doi: 10.1145/2591888.2591893.
dc.relation.referencesPresidencia de la República de Colombia, “Decreto 2710 de 2014.” 2014.
dc.relation.referencesPresidencia de la República de Colombia, “Decreto 2236 de 2017,” 2018.
dc.relation.referencesM. P. González-Zabala, J. M. Sánchez-Torres, and J. A. Holbrook, “Análisis de los indicadores para medir las iniciativas de Sociedad de la Información propuestas por el,” Univ. Humanística, vol. 76, pp. 277–298, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesJ. E. Padilla-Beltrán, P. L. Vega-Rojas, and D. A. Rincón-Caballero, “Tendencias y dificultades para el uso de las TIC en educaciòn superior. (Spanish),” Tendencies Difficulties Assoc. with use ICTs High. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 272–295, 2014, doi: ISSN: 1900-3803.
dc.relation.referencesL. Vega Perez and L. A. Reyez Cañas, “Impacto del uso de las tecnologìas de la información y las comunicaciones en la gestiòn judicial de la dirección seccional de administración judicial de Cúcuta,” 2015.
dc.relation.referencesSuperintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios, “Informe auditoria interna de gestion proceso tecnologias de informacion sui.” 2016.
dc.relation.referencesJ. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, 2014.
dc.relation.referencesJ. S. Borja-Acosta and J. M. Sánchez-Torres, “A methodology to explore key factors and barriers affecting adoption of ICTs in e-government,” Proc. 17th Eur. Conf. Digit. Governmen, pp. 351–355, 2017.
dc.relation.referencesJ. M. Sánchez-torres, M. P. González-zabala, and M. P. Sánchez-Muñoz, “La Sociedad de la Información : Génesis , Iniciativas , Concepto y su Relación con Las Tic Information Society : Genesis , Initiatives , Concept and its Relation to ICT,” Rev. la Fac. Ing. Fis. la UIS, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2012.
dc.relation.referencesJ. M. Sánchez-Torres, “‘La Paradoja del Dr. Jekyll y Mr. Hyde en la Sociedad de la Información,’” 2015, vol. 2014.
dc.relation.referencesJ. M. Sánchez-Torres, “Propuesta metodológica para evaluar políticas públicas de promoción del e-goverment como campo de aplicación de la sociedad de la información. Conceptualización y aplicación empírica en el caso colombiano,” Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2005.
dc.relation.referencesM. Hilbert, “Toward a Conceptual Framework for ICT for Development: Lessons Learned from the Cube Framework Used in Latin America (English),” Inf. Technol. Int. Dev., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 243–259, 2012.
dc.relation.referencesA. Parasuraman and D. Grewal, “Determining the impact of service quality on citizens’ satisfaction and the role of citizens’ demographics. The case of the Greek citizen’s service centers,” TQM J., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 168–174, 2020, doi: 10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0274.
dc.relation.referencesA. Barron and D. Schneckenberg, “A theoretical framework for exploring the influence of national culture on Web 2 . 0 adoption in corporate contexts,” Corp. Context. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 176–186, 2012.
dc.relation.referencesI. Sahin, F. Rogers, F. Rogers, and F. Rogers, “Detailed review of Rogers ’ Diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 14–23, 2006.
dc.relation.referencesR. Ochoa, “innovaciones en procesos al interior de organizaciones proveedoras de contenidos en línea,” 2015.
dc.relation.referencesL. Williams and H. Dickinson, “Can knowledge management enhance technology adoption in healthcare? A review of the literature,” Evid. Policy A J. Res. Debate Pract., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 309–331, 2010, doi: 10.1332/174426410X524811.
dc.relation.referencesE. J. Rodríguez Martínez and J. M. Sanchez Torres, “Evaluación del grado de apropiación de herramientas Web 2.0 en los estudiantes de educación media en Colombia, a través de un sistema de indicadores multidimensional,” 2017.
dc.relation.referencesS. Sharma, “Assessing e-government implementations,” Electron. Gov. An Int. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 198–212, 2004.
dc.relation.referencesT. P. N. Kalusopa, “Developing an e-records readiness framework for labor organizations in Botswana,” Inf. Dev., vol. 21, no. 4494, pp. 199–215, 2011.
dc.relation.referencesE. Ziemba, “Examining Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Information Society - Lessons Learned from Poland,” ECIS, pp. 0–15, 2015.
dc.relation.referencesB. Pudjianto and H. Zo, “Next generation of e-Government for developing countries: Lessons learned from the cases of the EU and Korea,” Proc. - 3rd Int. Conf. Converg. Hybrid Inf. Technol. ICCIT 2008, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 985–991, 2008, doi: 10.1109/ICCIT.2008.395.
dc.relation.referencesZ. Andreopoulou, “Adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) in public Forest service in Greece,” J. Environ. Prot. Ecol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1194–1204, 2009.
dc.relation.referencesOCDE, OECD Guide to Measuring the Information Society 2011. 2011.
dc.relation.referencesB. Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, D. Budgen, M. Turner, J. Bailey, and S. Linkman, “Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009.
dc.relation.referencesS. O’Neill, A. Kealy, and L. Stapleton, Gestalt - New technology old cultures a review of the adoption of the telemedicine centre in Kosovo, vol. 15, no. PART 1. IFAC, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesA. E. Strategy and B. Ngwenya, “Decision Support Systems: An E-Government Strategy to Enhance Human Resources Output in Public Sector Organisations,” Decis. Support Syst., pp. 1–22, 2013, doi: 10.1002/9781118785317.weom070211.
dc.relation.referencesL.-H. Cheng, C.-T. Wen, E. Y. Li, and T.-Y. Lin, “Service innovation activities in e-government initiatives: The Taiwan experience,” Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 54–71, 2012, doi: 10.1504/IJSTM.2012.048025.
dc.relation.referencesC. Löffler and M. Hettich, Introducing Mobile Services to Developing Countries - A South African Perspective. 2011.
dc.relation.referencesE. Maldonado, “The Process of Introducing FLOSS in the Public Administration : The Case of Venezuela The Process of Introducing FLOSS in the Public Administration : The Case of Venezuela,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. XX, no. 11, pp. 756–783, 2010.
dc.relation.referencesM. Rawas, “Towards a better understanding of e-Government implementation,” Eng. Syst. Manag. Its Appl. (ICESMA), 2010 Second Int. Conf., pp. 1–6, 2010.
dc.relation.referencesA. Beldad, M. De Jong, and M. Steehouder, “How shall i trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 857–869, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.013.
dc.relation.referencesE. Ziaeipour, A. Taghizade, F. Bazazan, F. Khoshalhan, and A. Mohamadian, “A model for national e-readiness assessment based on system approach,” ITNG 2009 - 6th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. New Gener., pp. 993–998, 2009, doi: 10.1109/ITNG.2009.206.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Choudrie and A. Papazafeiropoulou, “Lessons learnt from the broadband diffusion in South Korea and the UK: implications for future government intervention in technology diffusion,” Electron. Gov. An Int. J., vol. 3, no. 0, pp. 373–385, 2010, doi: 10.1504/EG.2006.010800.
dc.relation.referencesV. Hughes and P. E. D. Love, “Toward cyber‐centric management of policing: back to the future with information and communication technology,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 604–612, 2004, doi: 10.1108/02635570410550269.
dc.relation.referencesP. Ang and N. Binti, “E-Readiness for Industrialised Building System ( IBS ) Components Management: Exploratory Study In Malaysian,” Int. Conf. Innov. Manag. Technol. Res. IEEE, no. May, pp. 21–22, 2012.
dc.relation.referencesN. Mnjama and J. Wamukoya, “E-government and records management: an assessment tool for e-records readiness in government,” Electron. Libr., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 274–284, 2007, doi: 10.1108/02640470710754797.
dc.relation.referencesJ. R. Rodríguez, “The ‘Barcelona model’ of eGovernment: adoption and institutionalisation,” UOC Pap., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–6, 2006.
dc.relation.referencesM. A. Shareef, N. Archer, V. Kumar, and U. Kumar, “Developing Fundamental Capabilities for Successful e-government implementation,” J. Public Policy, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 159–177, 2010.
dc.relation.referencesM. K. Feeney and E. W. Welch, “Implementing Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Public Organizations: The Mediating Effects of Organization Routineness and Centralization on ICT and Managerial Outcomes,” Proc. 14th Annu. Int. Conf. Digit. Gov. Res., pp. 38–45, 2013, doi: 10.1145/2479724.2479734.
dc.relation.referencesC. A. Sanga, S. D. Tumbo, and M. R. S. Mlozi, “System Design and ICT Adoption in Agricultural Extension Services Delivery in Tanzania,” Technol. Dev. Platf. Enhanc. Success. Glob. E-Government Des., no. JUNE, pp. 282–306, 2013, doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4900-2.ch015.
dc.relation.referencesM. A. Wahsh and J. S. Dhillon, “An investigation of factors affecting the adoption of cloud computing for E-government implementation,” 2015 IEEE Student Conf. Res. Dev., pp. 323–328, 2015, doi: 10.1109/SCORED.2015.7449349.
dc.relation.referencesS. Saxena, “Enhancing ICT infrastructure in public services: Factors influencing mobile government (m-government) adoption in India,” Bottom Line, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 279–296, 2017, doi: 10.1108/BL-08-2017-0017.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Choudrie, A. Alfalah, N. Spencer, and D. Sundaram, “Are Older Citizens Using the E-MOI portal in Saudi Arabia, Hail City: A Quantitative Study,” Proc. 51st Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.moi.gov.sa.
dc.relation.referencesK. A. Al Mansoori, J. Sarabdeen, and A. L. Tchantchane, “Investigating Emirati citizens’ adoption of e-government services in Abu Dhabi using modified UTAUT model,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 455–481, 2018, doi: 10.1108/ITP-12-2016-0290.
dc.relation.referencesT. (David) Lee, H. Park, and J. Lee, “Collaborative accountability for sustainable public health: A Korean perspective on the effective use of ICT-based health risk communication,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 226–236, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.12.008.
dc.relation.referencesA. Roy, G. Dutta, and P. K. Das, “Exploring the determinants of mobile-based services diffusion: past determinants, emergent pattern and a proposed framework,” 2019.
dc.relation.referencesL. F. Rodriguez-Hevía, J. Navío-Marco, and L. M. Ruiz-Gómez, “Citizens’ involvement in e-government in the European Union: The rising importance of the digital skills,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 17, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU12176807.
dc.relation.referencesS. Lama, S. Pradhan, and A. Shrestha, “Exploration and Implication of Factors affecting e-Tourism Adoption in Developing Countries: A case of Nepal,” Inf. Technol. Tour., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2020.
dc.relation.referencesR. Heeks and E.-E. Ritse, “e-Business Adoption and Use Among African Women- Owned SMEs : An Analytical Study in Nigeria,” Proc. Seventh Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Dev., pp. 1–10, 2015.
dc.relation.referencesK. S. Tan, U. C. Eze, and S. C. Chong, “Effects of Industry Type on ICT Adoption among Malaysian SMEs Effects of Industry Type on ICT Adoption among Malaysian SMEs,” J. Supply Chain Cust. Relatsh. Manag., no. January, 2012, doi: 10.5171/2012.113797.
dc.relation.referencesI. Harris, Y. Wang, and H. Wang, “Int . J . Production Economics ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends : Unleashing potential for the future,” Intern. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 159, pp. 88–103, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.005.
dc.relation.referencesV. Ahuja, J. Yang, and R. Shankar, “Perceptions Affecting ICT Adoption for Building Project Management in the Indian Construction Industry,” Int. J. Constr. Manag., no. November, pp. 37–41, 2014, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2010.10773141.
dc.relation.referencesJ.-P. Van-Belle and W. Chigona, “School-level ICT Adoption Factors in the Western Cape Schools,” Proc. 4th IEEE Int. Work. Technol. Educ. Dev. Ctries., no. February 2001, 2006, doi: 10.1109/TEDC.2006.24.
dc.relation.referencesM. Marasini, R., Ions, K., & Ahmad, “Assessment of e-business adoption in SMEs A study of manufacturing industry in the UK North East region,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., vol. 5, pp. 627–644, 2008, doi: 10.1108/17410380810877294.
dc.relation.referencesN.-N. Manochehri, R. Al-Esmail, and R. Ashrafi, “Examining the impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on enterprise practices: A preliminary perspective from Qatar,” Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2012.
dc.relation.referencesP. Makiwa, “ICT adoption and use in Zimbabwean SMEs,” 2016 IST-Africa Week Conf., no. May, pp. 1–8, 2016, doi: 10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2016.7530576.
dc.relation.referencesA. Scupola, “ICT Adoption in Facilities Management Supply Chain : The Case of Denmark,” J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 53–78, 2012.
dc.relation.referencesA. Alaghbandrad, M. B. Nobakht, M. Hosseinalipour, and E. Asnaashari, “ICT adoption in the Iranian construction Industry: Barriers and opportunities,” 28th Int. Symp. Autom. Robot. Constr. IAARC, pp. 280–285, 2011.
dc.relation.referencesP. Evangelista and E. Sweeney, “Information and communication technology adoption in the Italian road freight haulage industry,” Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag., vol. 19, no. 3, 2014.
dc.relation.referencesK. Sin-Tan, S. Choy-Chong, B. Lin, and U. Cyril-Eze, “Internet-based ICT adoption : Evidence from Malaysian SMEs Internet-based ICT adoption : evidence from Malaysian SMEs,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., no. March, 2009, doi: 10.1108/02635570910930118.
dc.relation.referencesA. Imran, “Significant barriers to ICT adoption in the public sector in the Least Developed Countries ( LDCs ): A case study of Bangladesh,” ACIS 2006 Proc., p. 105, 2006.
dc.relation.referencesA. M. Dewan and S. A. Nazmin, “The opportunities and barriers of using ICT by Small and Medium Enterprises in Bangladesh : Case of SMEs in BSCIC Industrial Estates,” Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2008, pp. 656–661, 2008.
dc.relation.referencesU. Thevi Munikrishnan, N. G. Siew, I. A. Ho, J. O. Ann, R. Nerina, and R. Yusuf, “Drivers and Inhibitors of ICT Adoption in Malaysian Travel Agencies: TOE Perspective,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijem.upm.edu.my.
dc.relation.referencesM. Wongsim, R. Sonthiprasat, and O. Surinta, “Factors influencing the adoption of Agricultural Management Information Systems in Thailand,” 2018 3rd Technol. Innov. Manag. Eng. Sci. Int. Conf., pp. 1–4, 2018.
dc.relation.referencesJ. C. Athapaththu and B. Nishantha, “Information and communication technology adoption in SMEs in Sri Lanka; Current level of ICT usage and perceived barriers,” International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, vol. 8, no. 1. IGI Global, pp. 1–15, Jan. 01, 2018, doi: 10.4018/IJEEI.2018010101.
dc.relation.referencesA. Singh, J. Thakkar, and M. Jenamani, “An integrated Grey-DEMATEL approach for evaluating ICT adoption barriers in manufacturing SMEs: Analysing Indian MSMEs,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 2019, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2018-0211.
dc.relation.referencesF. Petersen, A. Brown, S. Pather, and W. D. Tucker, “Challenges for the adoption of ICT for diabetes self-management in South Africa,” in Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, Sep. 2020, vol. 86, no. 5, doi: 10.1002/isd2.12113.
dc.relation.referencesH. Kusuma, M. Muafi, H. M. Aji, and S. Pamungkas, “Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Demographic Characteristics,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 969–980, 2020, doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.969.
dc.relation.referencesS. Bayona-Oré and R. Estrada, “Critical Success Factors Associated to Tourism e-Commerce: Study of Peruvian Tourism Operators Sussy Bayona-Oré 1,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ijacsa.thesai.org.
dc.relation.referencesL. Arendt, “Barriers to ICT adoption in SMEs: how to bridge the digital divide?,” J. Syst. Inf. Technol., 2008, doi: 10.1108/13287260810897738.
dc.relation.referencesS. Khalid and T. Nyvang, “A change agent ’ s facilitation process for overcoming the barriers of ICT adoption for educational administration – The case of a rural-Bangladesh vocational institution,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 547–561, 2014.
dc.relation.referencesM. A. Burhanuddin, F. Arif, V. Azizah, and A. S. Prabuwono, “Barriers and Challenges for Technology Transfer in Malaysian Small and Medium Industries,” 2009 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Eng., no. May, pp. 258–261, 2009, doi: 10.1109/ICIME.2009.39.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Escobar-Pérez and Á. Cuervo-Martínez, “Validez De Contenido Y Juicio De Expertos: Una Aproximación a Su Utilización,” Av. en Medición, vol. 6, pp. 27–36, 2008.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembINNOVACIONES TECNOLOGICAS
dc.subject.lembTechnological innovations
dc.subject.proposalAdopción de TIC
dc.subject.proposalGobierno electrónico
dc.subject.proposalFactores habilitantes
dc.subject.proposalFactores inhibidores
dc.subject.proposalICT adoption
dc.subject.proposale-government
dc.subject.proposalEnabling factors
dc.subject.proposalInhibitory factors
dc.title.translatedAdoption of Information and communication technologies in colombian e-government projects: Enabling and inhibiting factors
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Arquivos deste item

Thumbnail
Nome:
7186246.2022.pdf
Tamanho:
2.685Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descrição:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería ...
Visualizar/Abrir

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalExceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.This document has been deposited by the author (s) under the following certificate of deposit