Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorArango Aramburo, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez Mosquera, Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-02T22:31:13Z
dc.date.available2022-09-02T22:31:13Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82245
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas, tablas
dc.description.abstractEl cambio climático plantea desafíos a la hora de diseñar mecanismos para su mitigación, por esta razón en esta tesis, se analiza el efecto de elementos de diseño del Programa Nacional de Cupos Transables (PNCTE), como el límite de emisiones, la probabilidad de monitoreo y el volumen de compensaciones permitidas sobre el precio de los permisos y las emisiones agregadas. Los efectos se evalúan utilizando un modelo económico estático que analiza la interacción entre un regulador y tres conjuntos de actores, en el marco de un Sistema de Comercio de Emisiones (SCE) bajo cumplimento imperfecto. El modelo plantea una serie de hipósis teóricas donde se sugiere que una estrategia de cumplimiento mayor aumenta el valor esperado de la penalización lo que hace que en equilibrio las firmas se anticipen y disminuyan su nivel de emisiones. Al mismo tiempo, las firmas, aumentan el número de permisos que adquieren en el mercado secundario, llevando a un aumento en el precio de equilibrio dado que la oferta total de permisos es limitada. Adicionalmente, en contraste con la mayoría de SCE en operación en otros mercados, cuando el regulador decide aumentar el volumen de permisos asignados para proyectos de compensación voluntarias, el precio de los permisos aumenta; la diferencia radica en que en el PNCTE las compensaciones no representan permisos adicionales por fuera del límite definido. Por tal razón, el aumento en el volumen de permisos asignados a proyectos de compensación voluntarias representa una disminución del volumen de permisos asignados a los agentes regulados. Finalmente, se propone un diseño experimental que busque testear las hipótesis teóricas derivadas del modelo teórico. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractClimate change poses challenges to the design of mitigation mechanisms. This document analyzes the effect of the design elements of the Colombian National Tradable Quotas Program (PNCTE, for its acronym in Spanish), such as the emissions limit, the monitoring probability and the allowed offset volume on the permit price and aggregate emissions. The effects are assessed using a static economic model that analyses the interaction between a regulator and three sets of actors, within the framework of an imperfectly functioning Emissions Trading System (SCE, for its acronyms in Spanish). The results suggest that a stronger compliance strategy increases the expected value of the penalty, which in turn leads to companies anticipating and reducing their emissions. At the same time, companies increase the number of permits they purchase on the secondary market, leading to an increase in the balance price as the total supply of permits is limited. In contrast to most of the SCE/ETSs in operation, the permit’s price increases, when the regulator decides to increase the volume of permits allocated for voluntary offset projects. The difference is that in the PNCTE, offsets do not represent additional permits out of the defined limit. Thus, an increase in the volume of permits allocated to voluntary offset projects represents a decrease in the volume of permits allocated to regulated actors. Finally, an experimental design is proposed seeking to test theoretical hypotheses derived from the model.
dc.format.extentxiv, 72 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::333 - Economía de la tierra y de la energía
dc.subject.ddc350 - Administración pública y ciencia militar::354 - Administración pública de la economía y el medio ambiente
dc.titleEfectos de elementos de diseño del Programa Nacional de Cupos Transables de Emisión (PNCTE) sobre los precios de los cupos y las emisiones agregadas: Un enfoque experimental
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
dc.coverage.countryColombia
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de geociencias
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Minas
dc.publisher.placeMedellín, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relation.referencesAlbin, P. S., & Foley, D. K. (1998). Barriers and bounds to rationality: Essays on economic complexity and dynamics in interactive systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
dc.relation.referencesAldana, F. T. (2003). Nobel 2002: impulso a la teoría económica experimental. Ciencia Ergo Sum, 10(2), 213–220.
dc.relation.referencesAzqueta, D. (2002). Introducción a la Economía Ambiental. (McGraw-Hill (ed.)).
dc.relation.referencesBaranzini, A., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Carattini, S., Howarth, R. B., Padilla, E., & Roca, J. (2017). Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.462
dc.relation.referencesBodsky, R., Donato, D., James, K., & Porter, D. (2012). Experimental evidence on the properties of the California’s cap and trade price containment reserve. Economic Science Institute, Chapeman University, May, 1–63.
dc.relation.referencesBurtraw, D., Goeree, J., Holt, C. A., Myers, E., Palmer, K., & Shobe, W. (2009). Collusion in Auctions for Emission Permits: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(4), 672–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20460
dc.relation.referencesBurtraw, D., Palmer, K., Burtraw, D., Palmer, K., & Kahn, D. (2005). Allocation of CO 2 Emissions Allowances Allocation of CO 2 Emissions Allowances in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program.
dc.relation.referencesCason, T. N. (2010). What can laboratory experiments teach us about emissions permit market design? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 39(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500007218
dc.relation.referencesCason, T. N., Gangadharan, L., & Duke, C. (2003). Market power in tradable emission markets: A laboratory testbed for emission trading in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00187-3
dc.relation.referencesCastro-Rodriguez, F., & Arocena, P. (2000). La liberalización de sectores regulados. Boletín Económico de ICE, Información Comercial Española, ISSN 0214-8307, No 2640, 2000, Pags. 26-36.
dc.relation.referencesCoase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/724810
dc.relation.referencesCong, R.-G., & Wei, Y.-M. (2012). Experimental comparison of impact of auction format on carbon allowance market. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 16, Issue 6). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.049
dc.relation.referencesCoria, J., & Sterner, T. (2009). Tradable Permits in Developing Countries: Evidence From Air Pollution in Chile. The Journal of Environment &amp Development, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496509355775
dc.relation.referencesCoria, J., & Villegas-Palacio, C. (2010). Targeted Enforcement and Aggregate Emissions With Uniform Emission Taxes. 455. http://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/gunwpe/0455.html%5Cnfile:///D:/Archivos Dropbox/Dropbox/Papers/Coria, Villegas-Palacio/Unknown/Coria, Villegas-Palacio - 2010 - Targeted Enforcement and Aggregate Emissions With Uniform Emission Taxes.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDobson, S., & Winter, J. (2018). Assessing policy support for emissions-intensive and trade- exposed industries. The Shool of Public Policy Publications, 11(October), 0–47.
dc.relation.referencesFell, H., Moore, E., & Morgenstern, R. D. (2011). Cost Containment under Cap and Trade : A Review of the Literature. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 5, 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000044
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, D., & Cassar, A. (2004). Economics Lab: An Intensive Course in Experimental Economics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.05.001
dc.relation.referencesGilbertson, T., & Reyes, O. (2006). El Mercado de Emisiones: Cómo funciona y por qué fracasa. In Earth.
dc.relation.referencesHolt, C. A., & Shobe, W. M. (2016). Reprint of: Price and quantity collars for stabilizing emission allowance prices: Laboratory experiments on the EU ETS market stability reserve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 80(September 2014), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.01.003
dc.relation.referencesICAP. (2020). Emission Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2020. 160.
dc.relation.referencesIDEAM, PNUD, MADS, & DNP. (2018). Segundo Reporte Bienal de Actualización de Colombia ante la CMNUCC. 180. www.minambiente.gov.co; www.co.undp.org
dc.relation.referencesJi, X., Li, G., & Wang, Z. (2017). Allocation of emission permits for China ’ s power plants : A systemic Pareto optimal method. Applied Energy, 204, 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.033
dc.relation.referencesKemfert, C., Kohlhaas, M., Truong, T., & Protsenko, A. (2006). The environmental and economic effects of European emissions trading. Climate Policy, 6(4), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685612
dc.relation.referencesKerr, S., Montero, J., Lubowski, R., Cadena, A., Londoño, M., Cavallo, A., Lafferty, L., Alarcon, S., Solanilla, A., Rudas, G., Ignacio, L., Macías, L. F., Marín, D., & Palma, M. (2019). Designing a prototype emissions trading system for Colombia. April
dc.relation.referencesKoten, S. van. (2014). Do emission trading schemes facilitate eficient abatment investments? An esxperimental study. Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education, 1211–3298.
dc.relation.referencesKuusela, O.-P., & Lintunen, · Jussi. (2020). A Cap-and-Trade Commitment Policy with Allowance Banking. Environmental and Resource Economics, 75, 421–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00395-y
dc.relation.referencesMedina, C. H. (2013). Guía paso a paso de experimentos en Z-Tree Step by step guide to experiments on Z-Tree.
dc.relation.referencesMuller, Adrew, & Mesterlma, S. (2016). Emission Trading with Shares and Coupons : A Laboratory Experiment. The Energy Journal, 15(2), 185–211.
dc.relation.referencesMuller, Andrew, & Mestelman, S. (1998). What have we learned from microdatasets. Managerial and Decision Economics, 19(4), 225–238.
dc.relation.referencesMunnings, C., Morgenstern, R. D., Wang, Z., & Liu, X. (2016). Assessing the design of three carbon trading pilot programs in China. Energy Policy, 96(2016), 688–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.015
dc.relation.referencesNaegele, H. (2018). Offset Credits in the EU ETS: A Quantile Estimation of Firm-Level Transaction Costs. Environmental and Resource Economics, 70(1), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0111-1
dc.relation.referencesPang, T., & Duan, M. (2016). Cap setting and allowance allocation in China’s emissions trading pilot programmes: special issues and innovative solutions. Climate Policy, 16(7), 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1052956
dc.relation.referencesPartnership for Market Readiness, & International Carbon Action Partnership. (2016). Comercio de emisiones en la práctica: manual sobre el diseño y la implementación de sistemas de comercio de emisiones. 1–211
dc.relation.referencesPerkis, D. F., Cason, T. N., & Tyner, W. E. (2016). An Experimental Investigation of Hard and Soft Price Ceilings in Emissions Permit Markets. Environmental and Resource Economics, 63(4), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9810-z
dc.relation.referencesPerman, R., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., & Common, M. (2006). Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. In Pearson Education Limited (Ed.), Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry (3rd ed., Vol. 6, Issue 10). https://doi.org/10.2174/156802606777323773
dc.relation.referencesPigou, A. C. (1952). The economics of welfare. In Development (4th ed.). Macmillian and Co. Limited Published.
dc.relation.referencesRíos, R. A., Arango, F., Acevedo-Daunas, R., & Vicentini, V. L. (2013). Estrategias de mitigación y métodos para la estimación de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero en el sector transporte. Banco Interamericano Del Desarrollo, 1–138. https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/3613/Estrategias de mitigación y métodos para la estimación de las emisiones de gases efecto invernadero. En el sector transporte..pdf?sequence=4
dc.relation.referencesRona, N. (2019). Colombia: Impuesto Nacional al Carbono. Programa EUROCLIMA+. https://ledslac.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/EdC-Impuesto-al-Carbono-Colombia-ago19-comentarios-RA-_VF-rev.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSchaeffer, G. J., & Sonnemans, J. (2000). The influence of banking and borrowing under different penalty regimes in tradable green certificate markets-results from an experimental economics laboratory experiment. Energy and Environment, 11(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305001500211
dc.relation.referencesSmith, V. L. (1976). Economics : Induced Experimental Value Theory. American Economic Review, 66(2), 274–279. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1817233
dc.relation.referencesSousa, R., Álvarez, A. C., Rojas, N., Melo Leon, S. F., Romero, G., Riveros, L., Calderon, S., & Vazao, C. (2018). Mitigación del cambio climático con un Sistema de Comercio de Emisiones en Colombia: primeros hallazgos económicos. Archivos de Economía. https://www.dnp.gov.co/estudios-y-publicaciones/estudios-
dc.relation.referencesSterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. In McGraw-Hill higher education. McGraw- Hill/Irwin. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336
dc.relation.referencesStranlund, J. K., & Chavez, C. A. (2000). Effective Enforcement of a Transferable Emissions Permit System with a Self-Reporting Requirement. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 18(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008160317757
dc.relation.referencesStranlund, J. K., Murphy, J. J., & Spraggon, J. M. (2011). An experimental analysis of compliance in dynamic emissions markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.10.010
dc.relation.referencesStranlund, J. K., Murphy, J. J., & Spraggon, J. M. (2014a). Price controls and banking in emissions trading: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.04.002
dc.relation.referencesStranlund, J. K., Murphy, J. J., & Spraggon, J. M. (2014b). Price controls and banking in emissions trading: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.04.002
dc.relation.referencesTlapanco, H. D. H. (2016). Experimentos en una ciencia no experimental. Investigación Económica, 75(295), 31–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inveco.2016.03.002
dc.relation.referencesTrotignon, R. (2012). Combining cap-and-trade with offsets: Lessons from the EU-ETS. Climate Policy, 12(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.637820
dc.relation.referencesVela Ortiz, S. (2005). Marco teórico de la Directiva de Comercio de Emisiones. Información Comercial Española. Revista de Economia, 822, 39–50.
dc.relation.referencesWarglien, M. G. D. M. (2008). El laboratorio y la empresa: ¿una economía experimental aplicada? Las Nuevas Economías, 139–154.
dc.relation.referencesWiller, D., & Walker, H. (2007). Building Experiments: Testing Social Theory. In Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesZhao, J. (2003). Irreversible abatement investment under cost uncertainties: Tradable emission permits and emissions charges. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2765–2789. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00135-4
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembEvaluación del impacto ambiental - Colombia
dc.subject.lembEnvironmental impact analysis - Colombia
dc.subject.lembProtección del medio ambiente - Colombia
dc.subject.lembEnvironmental protection - Colombia
dc.subject.proposalEmissions Trading System
dc.subject.proposalSistemas de Comercio de Emisiones
dc.subject.proposalGrandfathering
dc.subject.proposalPrograma Nacional de Cupos Transables de Emisiones
dc.title.translatedEffects of design elements of the National Emission Tradable Quota Program (PNCTE) on quota prices and aggregate emissions: An experimental approach
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dc.description.curricularareaÁrea Curricular de Medio Ambiente


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito