Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorDuque Méndez, Néstor Darío
dc.contributor.authorLópez Guayasamin, Mónica Rosa
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T17:21:52Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T17:21:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82333
dc.descriptiongráficos, tablas
dc.description.abstractEn Colombia la Ley 1712 del 2014 “Transparencia y Acceso a la Información”, define los datos abiertos como todos aquellos datos primarios o sin procesar, que se encuentran en formatos estándar e interoperables que facilitan su acceso y reutilización, los cuales están bajo la custodia de las entidades públicas o privadas que cumplen con funciones públicas y que son puestos a disposición de cualquier ciudadano, de forma libre y sin restricciones, con el fin de que terceros puedan reutilizarlos y crear servicios derivados de los mismos. En la política de Datos abiertos el tema central es la calidad de los mismos. Aunque existe varios enfoques y definiciones sobre el tema, no se encuentra un modelo único integrado con métricas específicas para poder evaluar objetivamente las características involucradas en la calidad. Mediante este proyecto de tesis de maestría se propone identificar las características relevantes en la calidad de los datos abiertos, definir métricas para su evaluación y mecanismos automáticos y/o semi-automáticos para su cálculo. La investigación que se llevará a cabo será teórica-práctica de tipo descriptivo ya que permitirá identificar las características que deben ser incorporadas en el modelo para la medición de la calidad de los datos abiertos. A pesar de que el caso de aplicación es una compañía del sector energético en particular Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas, la propuesta busca ser generalizada para diferentes ambientes de datos abiertos. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractIn Colombia, Law 1712 of 2014 "Transparency and Access to Information", defines open data as all primary or raw data, found in standard and interoperable formats that facilitate access and reuse, which are under the custody of public or private entities that fulfill public functions and that are made available to any citizen, freely and without restrictions, so that third parties can reuse them and create services derived from them. In the Open Data policy, the central issue is the Quality of the same. Although there are several approaches and definitions on the subject, there is no single integrated model with specific metrics to be able to objectively evaluate the characteristics involved in quality. Through this master's thesis project, it is proposed to identify the relevant characteristics in the quality of open data, define metrics for their evaluation and automatic and / or semi-automatic mechanisms for their calculation. The research that will be carried out will be theoretical-practical of a descriptive type since it will allow identifying the characteristics that must be incorporated into the model for measuring the quality of open data. Despite the fact that the application case is a company in the energy sector in particular Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas, the proposal seeks to be generalized for different open data environments.
dc.format.extent85 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::001 - Conocimiento
dc.titleModelo para la evaluación de la calidad de datos abiertos aplicado en el sector energético – caso Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programManizales - Administración - Maestría en Administración de Sistemas Informáticos
dc.contributor.researchgroupGaia Grupo de Ambientes Inteligentes Adaptativos
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Administración de Sistemas Informáticos
dc.description.degreenameMag
dc.description.researchareaAnalítica de Datos
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Informática y Computación
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Administración
dc.publisher.placeManizales, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizales
dc.relation.references25000, I. P. (2021). Iso-25012 @ Iso25000.Com. Iso 25000 Software and Data Quality. https://iso25000.com/index.php/en/iso-25000-standards/iso-25012
dc.relation.referencesAbella, A., & De-pablos-heredero, M. O. C. (n.d.-a). INDICADORES DE CALIDAD DE DATOS ABIERTOS : EL CASO DEL PORTAL DE DATOS ABIERTOS DE BARCELONA Open data quality metrics : Barcelona open data portal case.
dc.relation.referencesAbella, A., & De-pablos-heredero, M. O. C. (n.d.-b). INDICADORES DE CALIDAD DE DATOS ABIERTOS : EL CASO DEL PORTAL DE DATOS ABIERTOS DE BARCELONA Open data quality metrics : Barcelona open data portal case. El Profesional de La Información.
dc.relation.referencesAbella, A., Ortiz-De-urbina-criado, M., & De-Pablos-heredero, C. (2019). Meloda 5: A metric to assess open data reusability. Profesional de La Informacion, 28(6), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.nov.20
dc.relation.referencesAhmed, H. H. (2018). Data quality assessment in the integration process of linked open data (LOD). Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA, 2017-Octob, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2017.178
dc.relation.referencesBatini, C., & Scannapieca, M. (2006). Data-Centric Systems and Applications: Data Quality Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques.
dc.relation.referencesBehkamal, B., Kahani, M., Bagheri, E., & Jeremic, Z. (2014). A metrics-driven approach for quality assessment of linked open data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9(2), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200006
dc.relation.referencesBicevskis, J., Bicevska, Z., Nikiforova, A., & Oditis, I. (2018). Data quality evaluation: a comparative analysis of company registers’ open data in four European countries. Computer Science and Information Systems, 17, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.15439/2018f92
dc.relation.referencesBonina, C., & Scrollini -Ilda, F. (n.d.). Governing open health data in Latin America.
dc.relation.referencesBrezočnik, L., Fister, I., & Podgorelec, V. (2018). Swarm Intelligence Algorithms for Feature Selection: A Review. Applied Sciences, 8(9), 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091521
dc.relation.referencesColborne, A., & Smit, M. (2018). Identifying and mitigating risks to the quality of open data in the post-truth era. Proceedings - 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2017, 2018-Janua, 2588–2594. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258218
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República. (2014). Ley 1712 de 2014. Presidencia de La Republica, 34. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=56882
dc.relation.referencesD´Agostino, M., Marti, M., Mejía, F., Cosio, G. de, & Faba, G. (2018). Estrategia para la gobernanza de datos abiertos de salud: un cambio de paradigma en los sistemas de información. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 41, e27. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2017.27
dc.relation.referencesDaraio, C., Lenzerini, M., Leporelli, C., Naggar, P., Bonaccorsi, A., & Bartolucci, A. (2016). The advantages of an Ontology-Based Data Management approach: openness, interoperability and data quality. Scientometrics, 108(1), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1913-6
dc.relation.referencesDawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003
dc.relation.referencesFerney, M. M. J., Beltran Nicolas Estefan, L., & Alexander, V. V. J. (2018). Assessing data quality in open data: A case study. 2017 Congreso Internacional de Innovacion y Tendencias En Ingenieria, CONIITI 2017 - Conference Proceedings, 2018-Janua, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIITI.2017.8273343
dc.relation.referencesGiovannini, E. (n.d.). Towards a Quality Framework for Composite Indicators. Oecd.
dc.relation.referencesIcontec. (n.d.). Norma Tecnica Colombiana ISO 55001.
dc.relation.referencesISO. (2021). ISO/IEC 25012. https://iso25000.com/index.php/en/iso-25000-standards/iso-25012
dc.relation.referencesKao, C. H., Hsieh, C. H., Chu, Y. F., Kuang, Y. T., & Yang, C. K. (2017). Using data visualization technique to detect sensitive information re-identification problem of real open dataset. Journal of Systems Architecture, 80(February), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2017.09.009
dc.relation.referencesKubler, S., Robert, J., Neumaier, S., Umbrich, J., & Le Traon, Y. (2018). Comparison of metadata quality in open data portals using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.003
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones [MINTIC]. (2019a). Ficha Tecnica Calidad de Datos. https://herramientas.datos.gov.co/es/fichatecnicacalidad
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones [MINTIC]. (2019b). fichatecnicacalidad @ herramientas.datos.gov.co. https://herramientas.datos.gov.co/es/fichatecnicacalidad
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones [MINTIC]. (2019c). MAE . G . GEN . 01 – Documento Maestro. 62. https://www.mintic.gov.co/arquitecturati/630/articles-144764_recurso_pdf.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMintic. (2011). Manual de Gobierno Digital Implementación. 2018, 1–38.
dc.relation.referencesMorbey, G. (2013). Data Quality for Decision Makers. In Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01823-8
dc.relation.referencesNikiforova, A. (2018). Open Data Quality Evaluation: A Comparative Analysis of Open Data in Latvia. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 6(4), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2018.6.4.04
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, J., Delgado, C., & Assaife, A. C. (2017). A recommendation approach for consuming linked open data. Expert Systems with Applications, 72, 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.037
dc.relation.referencesPowerData. (n.d.). Calidad de Datos. Cómo impulsar tu negocio con los datos. Retrieved May 19, 2019, from https://www.powerdata.es/calidad-de-datos
dc.relation.referencesPowerData. (2017). ¿Qué son los procesos ETL? https://blog.powerdata.es/el-valor-de-la-gestion-de-datos/qu-son-los-procesos-etl
dc.relation.referencesPowerDAta. (n.d.). Qué es un Data Lake y cómo funciona | Guía fácil y rápida. Retrieved July 7, 2019, from https://www.mdirector.com/marketing-digital/data-lake.html
dc.relation.referencesReiche, K. J., Höfig, E., & Schieferdecker, I. K. (2014). Assessment and visualization of metadata quality for government data. CeDEM 2014, International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. Proceedings : 21-23 May 2014, Danube University Krems, Austria, 335–346. http://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-305654.html
dc.relation.referencesRengifo, S. C., Medina, L. F., & Tamayo, A. V. (2016). Guía para el uso y aprovechamiento de Datos Abiertos en Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesRepublica, presidencia de la. (2018). Colombia, primer país en Latinoamérica con una política pública para la explotación de datos. http://es.presidencia.gov.co/noticia/180417-Colombia-primer-pais-en-Latinoamerica-con-una-politica-publica-para-la-explotacion-de-datos
dc.relation.referencesRíos Ramírez, A., & Garro, J. E. (2018). Accountability y sociedad civil: el control político en la era digital. Papel Político, 22(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.papo22-2.ascc
dc.relation.referencesRuijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., van den Berg, J., & Meijer, A. (2020). Open data work: understanding open data usage from a practice lens. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317753068
dc.relation.referencesSadiq, S., & Indulska, M. (2017). Open data: Quality over quantity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.003
dc.relation.referencesSafarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Utrecht School of Governance, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012
dc.relation.referencesSantos, P. X. dos, & Guanaes, P. (2018). Ciência aberta, dados abertos: desafio e oportunidade. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00120
dc.relation.referencesScavuzzo, M., Nitto, E. Di, & Ardagna, D. (2018). Experiences and challenges in building a data intensive system for data migration. Empirical Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9503-7
dc.relation.referencesTalukder, M. S., Shen, L., Hossain Talukder, M. F., & Bao, Y. (2018). Determinants of user acceptance and use of open government data (OGD): An empirical investigation in Bangladesh. Technology in Society, July, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.09.013
dc.relation.referencesTorchiano, M., Vetro, A., & Iuliano, F. (2017). Preserving the Benefits of Open Government Data by Measuring and Improving Their Quality: An Empirical Study. Proceedings - International Computer Software and Applications Conference, 1, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.192
dc.relation.referencesUtamachant, P., & Anutariya, C. (2018). An Analysis of High-Value Datasets: A Case Study of Thailand’s Open Government Data. Proceeding of 2018 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, JCSSE 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCSSE.2018.8457350
dc.relation.referencesVeljković, N., Bogdanović-Dinić, S., & Stoimenov, L. (2014). Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.011
dc.relation.referencesVerhulst, S. G., & Young, A. (2017). OPEN DATA IN DEVELOPING ECONOMIES Toward Building an Evidence Base on What Works and How The GovLab. www.odimpact.org
dc.relation.referencesVetrò, A., Canova, L., Torchiano, M., Minotas, C. O., Iemma, R., & Morando, F. (2016a). Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001
dc.relation.referencesXia, W., Xu, Z., & Mao, C. (2018a). User-driven filtering and ranking of topical datasets based on overall data quality. Proceedings - 2017 14th Web Information Systems and Applications Conference, WISA 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/WISA.2017.24
dc.relation.referencesXia, W., Xu, Z., & Mao, C. (2018b). User-driven filtering and ranking of topical datasets based on overall data quality. Proceedings - 2017 14th Web Information Systems and Applications Conference, WISA 2017, 2018-Janua(1), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1109/WISA.2017.24
dc.relation.referencesYoon, S. P., Joo, M. H., & Kwon, H. Y. (2019). How to guarantee the right to use PSI in the age of open data: Lessons from the data policy of South Korea. Information Polity, 24(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180103
dc.relation.referencesZhang, P., Xiong, F., Gao, J., & Wang, J. (n.d.). Data Quality in Big Data Processing: Issues, Solutions and Open Problems.
dc.relation.referencesZhang, P., Xiong, F., Gao, J., & Wang, J. (2018). Data quality in big data processing: Issues, solutions and open problems. 2017 IEEE SmartWorld Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing and Communications, Cloud and Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation, SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI 2017 - , 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC.2017.8397554
dc.relation.referencesZhang, R., Indulska, M., & Sadiq, S. (2019). Discovering Data Quality Problems: The Case of Repurposed Data. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00608-0
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Y., & Cai, L. (2015). The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, 14(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalDatos abiertos
dc.subject.proposalCalidad de datos
dc.subject.proposalMétricas de calidad
dc.subject.proposalOpen data
dc.subject.proposalData quality
dc.subject.proposalQuality metrics
dc.subject.unescoAcceso a la información
dc.subject.unescoAccess to information
dc.title.translatedModel for the evaluation of the quality of open data applied to the energy sector - case of Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentImage
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentBibliotecarios
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito