Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorMoreno Gómez, Luz Ángela
dc.contributor.authorLondoño Arévalo, María Antonieta
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:36:05Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:36:05Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82905
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas, fotografías, gráficas
dc.description.abstractObjetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar los niveles de referencia diagnóstico locales (NRDL) y las dosis alcanzables (DA) para pacientes pediátricos durante los procedimientos de tomografía computarizada (TC) más comunes en un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia. Metodología: Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de corte transversal que incluyó estudios en un periodo de tiempo comprendido entre enero 2019 y abril 2022, de una fase, de cráneo, tórax simple, tórax contrastado y abdomen-pelvis contrastado. El Nivel de referencia de diagnóstico (NRD) se obtuvo en función del índice de dosis de TC de volumen (CTDI vol) y el producto de longitud de dosis (DLP) para cinco grupos de edad en población pediátrica (hasta 18 años). Resultados: Los datos de los pacientes (577) en cuanto a CTDI vol y DLP se registraron de cinco grupos etarios, de tal forma que los resultados pudieran ser comparados con las publicaciones existentes en la literatura. Los percentiles 75 de CTDI vol y DLP se consideraron como valores de NRDL y los percentiles 50 se describieron como DA para esos parámetros. En consecuencia, los NRDL adquiridos se compararon con otros valores publicados nacional e internacionalmente. Conclusiones: El NRD desempeña un papel fundamental en la optimización de las dosis de radiación administradas a los pacientes y en la mejora de su protección. Este estudio proporciona los NRD y AD locales para la tomografía computarizada pediátrica más común en el Hospital de referencia y se plantean propuestas de mejora que permitan optimizar la práctica clínica y seguridad de los pacientes. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine local diagnostic reference levels (LDRL) and achievable doses (AD) of common pediatric CT procedures in a third-level pediatric hospital in the city of Bogotá Colombia. Methodology: Retrospective cross-sectional descriptive observational study that included single phase studies (head CT, thorax with and without contrast and abdomen-pelvis) between January 2019 and April 2022. Standard dose indexes (volume CT dose index - CTDI vol- and dose length product -DLP- were categorized by body part and age in patients under 18 years of age. Results: Patient data (577 studies) on CTDI vol and DLP were recorded from five age groups so that the results could be compared with the existing publications in the literature. The 75th percentiles of CTDI vol and DLP were considered as LDRL values and the 50 th percentiles were described as DA. Accordingly, the acquired LDRL were compared with national and international published values Conclusions: DRL plays a critical role in optimizing radiation doses administered to patients and improving radioprotection. This study provides the local DRL and AD for the most common pediatric computed tomography studies in the reference hospital and proposes strategies to promote the improvement and optimizing clinical practice and patient safety.
dc.format.extent59 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rightsDerechos reservados al autor, 2022
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::618 - Ginecología, obstetricia, pediatría, geriatría
dc.titleNiveles de referencia de diagnóstico en tomografía computarizada en un hospital pediátrico de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotá
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médica
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Radiología Pediátrica
dc.contributor.colaboratorHenao Gómez, Liliana
dc.contributor.colaboratorLópez Cadena, Andrés Fernando
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Radiología E Imágenes Diagnósticas (Grid)
dc.coverage.cityBogotá
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicas
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Radiología Pediátrica
dc.description.methodsEstudio Observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de corte transversal
dc.description.researchareaImágenes pediátricas
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicina
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAbalo, K. D., Rage, E., Leuraud, K., Richardson, D. B., le Pointe, H. D., Laurier, D., & Bernier, M. O. (2021). Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Radiology, 51(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04803-0
dc.relation.referencesACR-AAPM-SPR General Diagnostic Radiology Practice Parameters. Practice parameter for diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses in medical x-ray imaging. Disponible en: ACR–AAPM–SPR Practice Parameter for Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses in Medical X-Ray Imaging
dc.relation.referencesAlzen, G., & Benz-Bohm, G. (2011). Kinderradiologie - besonderheiten des strahlenschutzes. In Deutsches Arzteblatt (Vol. 108, Issue 24, pp. 407–414). https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2011.0407
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Association of Physycists in Medicine (AAPM). Size-specifric dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations: the report of AAPM Task Group 204. htps://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204. Pdf. Published 2011. Accessed October 9, 2021
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicine. (AAPM). (s.f). CT Scan Protocols - The Alliance for Quality Computed Tomography. Disponible en: https://www.aapm.org/pubs/CTProtocols
dc.relation.referencesAmis, E. S., & Butler, P. F. (2010). ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: Three years later. In Journal of the American College of Radiology (Vol. 7, Issue 11, pp. 865–870). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.04.006
dc.relation.referencesAmurao, M., King, S. H., Becker, M. D., Sheetz, M. A., Franz, S. C., Rubinstein, A. E., Gress, D. A., & Creech, W. (n.d.). ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources iii.
dc.relation.referencesBrady, A. P., Beets-Tan, R. G., Brkljačić, B., Catalano, C., Rockall, A., & Fuchsjäger, M. (2022). The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: a White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights into Imaging, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01241-4
dc.relation.referencesBos, D., Zensen, S., Opitz, M. K., Haubold, J., Nassenstein, K., Kinner, S., Schweiger, B., Forsting, M., Wetter, A., & Guberina, N. (2022). Diagnostic reference levels for chest computed tomography in children as a function of patient size. Pediatric Radiology, 52(8), 1446–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05340- 8
dc.relation.referencesCadavid Álvarez, L. M., Poveda Bolaño, J. F., Palacio Montoya, M. F., González Londoño, J. F., & Saldarriaga Arango, M. F. (2020). Niveles de referencia de dosis de radiación para la toma de imágenes en pediatría. Rev. Colomb. Radiol., 31(2), 5328–5334.
dc.relation.referencesCélier, D., Roch, P., Etard, C., Ducou Le Pointe, H., & Brisse, H. J. (2020). Multicentre survey on patient dose in paediatric imaging and proposal for updated diagnostic reference levels for France. Part 1: computed tomography. European Radiology, 30(2), 1156–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06405-3
dc.relation.referencesDe Crop, A., Smeets, P., Hoof, T.V., et al., 2015. Correlation of clinical and physical technical image quality in chest CT: a human cadaver study applied on iterative reconstruction. BMC Med. Imag. 15, 32
dc.relation.referencesDe Jesus FM, Magalhães LAG, Kodlulovich S. Paediatric CT exposure practice in the county of Rio de Janeiro: the need to establish diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. noviembre de 2016;171(3):389-97
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commission. Radiation Protection No 185 - European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Imaging [Internet]. 2018 [citado 26 de enero de 2021]. Disponible en: http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp content/uploads/2018/09/rp_185.pdf
dc.relation.referencesFood and drug administration (FDA). White paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. 2018. Disponible en: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging | FDA
dc.relation.referencesFrush DP, Soden B, Frush KS, Lowry C. Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Mar;178(3):721- 6. Doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780721. PMID: 11856705.
dc.relation.referencesGranata, C., Sorantin, E., Seuri, R., & Owens, C. M. (2019). European Society of Paediatric Radiology Computed Tomography and Dose Task Force: European guidelines on diagnostic reference levels for paediatric imaging. Pediatric Radiology, 49(5), 702–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04346-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04346-z
dc.relation.referencesGreenwood, T. J., Lopez-Costa, R. I., Rhoades, P. D., Ramírez-Giraldo, J. C., Starr, M., Street, M., Duncan, J., & McKinstry, R. C. (2015). CT dose optimization in pediatric radiology: A multiyear effort to preserve the benefits of imaging while reducing the risks. Radiographics, 35(5), 1539–1554. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140267
dc.relation.referencesGoske, M. J., Charkot, E., Herrmann, T., John, S. D., Mills, T. T., Morrison, G., & Smith, S. N. (2011). Image Gently: Challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatric Radiology, 41(5), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1957-3
dc.relation.referencesHall EJ. Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol Roentgenol Nucl Med Ultrasound CT MRI. 1 de octubre de 2002;32(10):700-700-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0774-8
dc.relation.references. Harding K, Thomson WH. Radiological protection and safety in medicine - ICRP 73. Eur J Nucl Med. octubre de 1997;24(10):1207
dc.relation.referencesHuda, W. (2004). Assessment of the problem: Pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Pediatric Radiology, 34(SUPPL. 3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1267-8
dc.relation.referencesIAEA Safety standards and related publications. (n.d.). http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/
dc.relation.referencesIEC, 2012. Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 2-44: Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of X-ray Equipment for Computed Tomography. IEC 60601-2-44, ed 3.1. IEC, Geneva.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), 1995. Medical imaging – the assessment of image quality. Report 54. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU. 2012 Apr;12(1):1-149. doi: 10.1093/jicru/ndt007. PMID: 24158924.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1977. Recommendations of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 26. Ann. ICRP 1(3): 1 - 53.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1990. Recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21:1–120 Ann 1991;21(1-3):1-201. PMID: 2053748
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1996. Harding K, Thomson WH. Radiological protection and safety in medicine - ICRP Publication 73. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997 Oct;24(10):1207-9. PMID: 9323259.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 2007a. ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. Doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. PMID: 18082557.
dc.relation.referencesICRP, Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M, Appelgate K, Sanchez R. ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP. 2013 Apr;42(2):1-63. Doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001. Erratum in: Ann ICRP. 2020 Oct 5;146645320966413. Erratum in: Ann ICRP. 2021 Mar 25;1466453211000254. PMID: 23218172.
dc.relation.referencesICRP, Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, Ortiz-López P, Mattsson S, Padovani R, Rogers A; Authors on behalf of ICRP. ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1- 144. Doi: 10.1177/0146645317717209. PMID: 29065694.
dc.relation.referencesIPSM/NRPB/CoR, 1992. National Protocol for Patient Dose Measurements in Diagnostic Radiology. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton. Disponible en: Diagnostic radiology: national protocol for patient dose measurements - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
dc.relation.referencesInternational Radiation Protection Association (IRPA). IRPA Guiding Principles on radiation protection culture. 2014. Disponible en: IRPA - INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION. IRPA Guiding Principles on RP Culture (2014).pdf
dc.relation.referencesIntegrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/).
dc.relation.referencesJärvinen H, Seuri R, Kortesniemi M, Lajunen A, Hallinen E, Savikurki-Heikkilä P, et al. Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT: a new approach with proposed values. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. julio de 2015;165(1-4):86- 90. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv044
dc.relation.referencesKanal, K. M., Butler, P. F., Chatfield, M. B., Wells, J., Samei, E., Simanowith, M., Golden, D., Gress, D. A., Burleson, J., Sensakovic, W. F., Strauss, K. J., & Frush, D. (2022). U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Pediatric CT Examinations. Radiology, 302(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021211241
dc.relation.referencesKleinman, P.L., Strauss, K.J., Zurakowski, D., Buckley, K.S., Taylor, G.A., 2010. Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 194, 1611–1619.
dc.relation.referencesKalender W.A, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz W.A. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9: 323-328
dc.relation.referencesLeung RS. Radiation protection of the child from diagnostic imaging. Curr Pediatr Rev.1 de enero de 2015;11(4):235-235-42
dc.relation.referencesLinet, M. S., Kim, K. P., & Rajaraman, P. (2009). Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: Epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatric Radiology, 39(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1026-3
dc.relation.referencesMahesh M. Update on radiation safety and dose reduction in pediatric neuroradiology. Pediatr Radiol. 1 de septiembre de 2015;45 Suppl 3:S370-S370
dc.relation.referencesMcnitt-Gray, M. F., & Morin, R. L. (2004). Selecting a New Computed Tomography Scanner: Things to Consider. www.acr.org/dyna/?docdepartments/stand_
dc.relation.referencesPearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, LeeC, Kim KP, Howe NL; Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancer. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505.doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0.Epub 2012 Jun 7. PMID: 22681860; PMCID: PMC2418594.
dc.relation.referencesPloussi, A., & Efstathopoulos, E. P. (2016). Importance of establishing radiation protection culture in Radiology Department. World Journal of Radiology, 8(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.142
dc.relation.referencesRehani, M. M., Szczykutowicz, T. P., & Zaidi, H. (2020). CT is still not a low-dose imaging modality. In Medical Physics (Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 293–296). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14000
dc.relation.referencesRehani, M. M., & Brady, Z. (2021). Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging special feature: editorial Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial 1.
dc.relation.referencesSamei, E., Christianson, O., 2014. Dose index analytics: more than a low number. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 11, 832–834.
dc.relation.referencesSatharasinghe, D. M., Jeyasugiththan, J., Wanninayake, W. M. N. M. B., & Pallewatte, A. S. (2021). Paediatric diagnostic reference levels in computed tomography: A systematic review. In Journal of Radiological Protection (Vol. 41, Issue 1, pp. R1–R27). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361- 6498/abd840
dc.relation.referencesSeidenbusch, M.C., Schneider, K., 2014. Conversion coefficients for determining organ doses in paediatric pelvis and hip joint radiography. Pediatr. Radiol. 44, 1110– 1123.
dc.relation.referencesSchauer DA, Linton OW. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure--are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys. 2009 Jul;97(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000356672.44380.b7. PMID: 19509507
dc.relation.referencesSiciliano, R. (2017). Radiological examinations in pediatric age. Annali Di Igiene Medicina Preventiva e Di Comunita, 29(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2017.2140
dc.relation.referencesSiegel, M. J., Mhlanga, J. C., Salter, A., & Ramirez-Giraldo, J. C. (2021). Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between contrast-enhanced single- and dual energy abdominopelvic computed tomography in children as a function of patient size. Pediatric Radiology, 51(11), 2000–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021- 05127-3
dc.relation.referencesSlovis TL. CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul;179(1):39-41. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790039. PMID: 12076901.
dc.relation.referencesSlovis TL, Berdon WE. The ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:217–317
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, K. J., Racadio, J. M., Johnson, N., Patel, M., & Nachabe, R. A. (2015). Estimates of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric peripheral and abdominal fluoroscopically guided procedures. American Journal of Roentgenology, 204(6), W713–W719. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13630
dc.relation.referencesStrauss KJ, Somasundaram E, Sengupta D, Marin JR, Brady SL. Radiation Dose for Pediatric CT: Comparison of Pediatric versus Adult Imaging Facilities. Radiology 2019;291(1)
dc.relation.referencesVassileva, J., Rehani, M., Kostova-Lefterova, D., et al., 2015. A study to establish international diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 165, 70–80.
dc.relation.referencesVawda, Z., Pitcher, R., Akudugu, J., & Groenewald, W. (2015). Diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography. South African Journal of Radiology, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v19i2.846
dc.relation.referencesWatson, D.J., Coakley, K.S., 2010. Paediatric CT reference doses based on weight and CT dosimetry phantom size: local experience using a 64-slice CT scanner. Pediatr. Radiol. 40, 693–703
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.decsTomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
dc.subject.decsTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subject.decsNiveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico
dc.subject.decsDiagnostic Reference Levels
dc.subject.proposalTomografía computarizada
dc.subject.proposalDiagnóstico
dc.subject.proposalPediatría
dc.subject.proposalComputed tomography
dc.subject.proposalDiagnosis
dc.subject.proposalPediatrics
dc.title.translatedReference levels of diagnosis in computed tomography in a high complexity pediatric hospital of the city of Bogotá
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
oaire.awardtitleNiveles de referencia de diagnóstico en tomografía computarizada en un hospital pediátrico de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotá
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dc.contributor.orcidLondoño Arévalo, Maria [0000-0002-1441-3354]
dc.contributor.cvlacLondoño Arévalo, María [https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001569205]


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito