Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento
Niveles de referencia de diagnóstico en tomografía computarizada en un hospital pediátrico de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotá
dc.rights.license | Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional |
dc.contributor.advisor | Moreno Gómez, Luz Ángela |
dc.contributor.author | Londoño Arévalo, María Antonieta |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-12T20:36:05Z |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-12T20:36:05Z |
dc.date.issued | 2022 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82905 |
dc.description | ilustraciones, diagramas, fotografías, gráficas |
dc.description.abstract | Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar los niveles de referencia diagnóstico locales (NRDL) y las dosis alcanzables (DA) para pacientes pediátricos durante los procedimientos de tomografía computarizada (TC) más comunes en un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia. Metodología: Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de corte transversal que incluyó estudios en un periodo de tiempo comprendido entre enero 2019 y abril 2022, de una fase, de cráneo, tórax simple, tórax contrastado y abdomen-pelvis contrastado. El Nivel de referencia de diagnóstico (NRD) se obtuvo en función del índice de dosis de TC de volumen (CTDI vol) y el producto de longitud de dosis (DLP) para cinco grupos de edad en población pediátrica (hasta 18 años). Resultados: Los datos de los pacientes (577) en cuanto a CTDI vol y DLP se registraron de cinco grupos etarios, de tal forma que los resultados pudieran ser comparados con las publicaciones existentes en la literatura. Los percentiles 75 de CTDI vol y DLP se consideraron como valores de NRDL y los percentiles 50 se describieron como DA para esos parámetros. En consecuencia, los NRDL adquiridos se compararon con otros valores publicados nacional e internacionalmente. Conclusiones: El NRD desempeña un papel fundamental en la optimización de las dosis de radiación administradas a los pacientes y en la mejora de su protección. Este estudio proporciona los NRD y AD locales para la tomografía computarizada pediátrica más común en el Hospital de referencia y se plantean propuestas de mejora que permitan optimizar la práctica clínica y seguridad de los pacientes. (Texto tomado de la fuente) |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To determine local diagnostic reference levels (LDRL) and achievable doses (AD) of common pediatric CT procedures in a third-level pediatric hospital in the city of Bogotá Colombia. Methodology: Retrospective cross-sectional descriptive observational study that included single phase studies (head CT, thorax with and without contrast and abdomen-pelvis) between January 2019 and April 2022. Standard dose indexes (volume CT dose index - CTDI vol- and dose length product -DLP- were categorized by body part and age in patients under 18 years of age. Results: Patient data (577 studies) on CTDI vol and DLP were recorded from five age groups so that the results could be compared with the existing publications in the literature. The 75th percentiles of CTDI vol and DLP were considered as LDRL values and the 50 th percentiles were described as DA. Accordingly, the acquired LDRL were compared with national and international published values Conclusions: DRL plays a critical role in optimizing radiation doses administered to patients and improving radioprotection. This study provides the local DRL and AD for the most common pediatric computed tomography studies in the reference hospital and proposes strategies to promote the improvement and optimizing clinical practice and patient safety. |
dc.format.extent | 59 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf |
dc.language.iso | spa |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights | Derechos reservados al autor, 2022 |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
dc.subject.ddc | 610 - Medicina y salud::618 - Ginecología, obstetricia, pediatría, geriatría |
dc.title | Niveles de referencia de diagnóstico en tomografía computarizada en un hospital pediátrico de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotá |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Especialidad Médica |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Radiología Pediátrica |
dc.contributor.colaborator | Henao Gómez, Liliana |
dc.contributor.colaborator | López Cadena, Andrés Fernando |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | Grupo de Investigación en Radiología E Imágenes Diagnósticas (Grid) |
dc.coverage.city | Bogotá |
dc.description.degreelevel | Especialidades Médicas |
dc.description.degreename | Especialista en Radiología Pediátrica |
dc.description.methods | Estudio Observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de corte transversal |
dc.description.researcharea | Imágenes pediátricas |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Medicina |
dc.publisher.place | Bogotá, Colombia |
dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
dc.relation.references | Abalo, K. D., Rage, E., Leuraud, K., Richardson, D. B., le Pointe, H. D., Laurier, D., & Bernier, M. O. (2021). Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Radiology, 51(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04803-0 |
dc.relation.references | ACR-AAPM-SPR General Diagnostic Radiology Practice Parameters. Practice parameter for diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses in medical x-ray imaging. Disponible en: ACR–AAPM–SPR Practice Parameter for Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses in Medical X-Ray Imaging |
dc.relation.references | Alzen, G., & Benz-Bohm, G. (2011). Kinderradiologie - besonderheiten des strahlenschutzes. In Deutsches Arzteblatt (Vol. 108, Issue 24, pp. 407–414). https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2011.0407 |
dc.relation.references | American Association of Physycists in Medicine (AAPM). Size-specifric dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations: the report of AAPM Task Group 204. htps://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204. Pdf. Published 2011. Accessed October 9, 2021 |
dc.relation.references | American Association of Physicists in Medicine. (AAPM). (s.f). CT Scan Protocols - The Alliance for Quality Computed Tomography. Disponible en: https://www.aapm.org/pubs/CTProtocols |
dc.relation.references | Amis, E. S., & Butler, P. F. (2010). ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: Three years later. In Journal of the American College of Radiology (Vol. 7, Issue 11, pp. 865–870). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.04.006 |
dc.relation.references | Amurao, M., King, S. H., Becker, M. D., Sheetz, M. A., Franz, S. C., Rubinstein, A. E., Gress, D. A., & Creech, W. (n.d.). ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources iii. |
dc.relation.references | Brady, A. P., Beets-Tan, R. G., Brkljačić, B., Catalano, C., Rockall, A., & Fuchsjäger, M. (2022). The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: a White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights into Imaging, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01241-4 |
dc.relation.references | Bos, D., Zensen, S., Opitz, M. K., Haubold, J., Nassenstein, K., Kinner, S., Schweiger, B., Forsting, M., Wetter, A., & Guberina, N. (2022). Diagnostic reference levels for chest computed tomography in children as a function of patient size. Pediatric Radiology, 52(8), 1446–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05340- 8 |
dc.relation.references | Cadavid Álvarez, L. M., Poveda Bolaño, J. F., Palacio Montoya, M. F., González Londoño, J. F., & Saldarriaga Arango, M. F. (2020). Niveles de referencia de dosis de radiación para la toma de imágenes en pediatría. Rev. Colomb. Radiol., 31(2), 5328–5334. |
dc.relation.references | Célier, D., Roch, P., Etard, C., Ducou Le Pointe, H., & Brisse, H. J. (2020). Multicentre survey on patient dose in paediatric imaging and proposal for updated diagnostic reference levels for France. Part 1: computed tomography. European Radiology, 30(2), 1156–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06405-3 |
dc.relation.references | De Crop, A., Smeets, P., Hoof, T.V., et al., 2015. Correlation of clinical and physical technical image quality in chest CT: a human cadaver study applied on iterative reconstruction. BMC Med. Imag. 15, 32 |
dc.relation.references | De Jesus FM, Magalhães LAG, Kodlulovich S. Paediatric CT exposure practice in the county of Rio de Janeiro: the need to establish diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. noviembre de 2016;171(3):389-97 |
dc.relation.references | European Commission. Radiation Protection No 185 - European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Imaging [Internet]. 2018 [citado 26 de enero de 2021]. Disponible en: http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp content/uploads/2018/09/rp_185.pdf |
dc.relation.references | Food and drug administration (FDA). White paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. 2018. Disponible en: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging | FDA |
dc.relation.references | Frush DP, Soden B, Frush KS, Lowry C. Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Mar;178(3):721- 6. Doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780721. PMID: 11856705. |
dc.relation.references | Granata, C., Sorantin, E., Seuri, R., & Owens, C. M. (2019). European Society of Paediatric Radiology Computed Tomography and Dose Task Force: European guidelines on diagnostic reference levels for paediatric imaging. Pediatric Radiology, 49(5), 702–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04346-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04346-z |
dc.relation.references | Greenwood, T. J., Lopez-Costa, R. I., Rhoades, P. D., Ramírez-Giraldo, J. C., Starr, M., Street, M., Duncan, J., & McKinstry, R. C. (2015). CT dose optimization in pediatric radiology: A multiyear effort to preserve the benefits of imaging while reducing the risks. Radiographics, 35(5), 1539–1554. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140267 |
dc.relation.references | Goske, M. J., Charkot, E., Herrmann, T., John, S. D., Mills, T. T., Morrison, G., & Smith, S. N. (2011). Image Gently: Challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatric Radiology, 41(5), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1957-3 |
dc.relation.references | Hall EJ. Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol Roentgenol Nucl Med Ultrasound CT MRI. 1 de octubre de 2002;32(10):700-700-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0774-8 |
dc.relation.references | . Harding K, Thomson WH. Radiological protection and safety in medicine - ICRP 73. Eur J Nucl Med. octubre de 1997;24(10):1207 |
dc.relation.references | Huda, W. (2004). Assessment of the problem: Pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Pediatric Radiology, 34(SUPPL. 3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1267-8 |
dc.relation.references | IAEA Safety standards and related publications. (n.d.). http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/ |
dc.relation.references | IEC, 2012. Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 2-44: Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of X-ray Equipment for Computed Tomography. IEC 60601-2-44, ed 3.1. IEC, Geneva. |
dc.relation.references | International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), 1995. Medical imaging – the assessment of image quality. Report 54. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD |
dc.relation.references | International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU. 2012 Apr;12(1):1-149. doi: 10.1093/jicru/ndt007. PMID: 24158924. |
dc.relation.references | International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1977. Recommendations of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 26. Ann. ICRP 1(3): 1 - 53. |
dc.relation.references | International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1990. Recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21:1–120 Ann 1991;21(1-3):1-201. PMID: 2053748 |
dc.relation.references | International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1996. Harding K, Thomson WH. Radiological protection and safety in medicine - ICRP Publication 73. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997 Oct;24(10):1207-9. PMID: 9323259. |
dc.relation.references | International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 2007a. ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. Doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. PMID: 18082557. |
dc.relation.references | ICRP, Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M, Appelgate K, Sanchez R. ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP. 2013 Apr;42(2):1-63. Doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001. Erratum in: Ann ICRP. 2020 Oct 5;146645320966413. Erratum in: Ann ICRP. 2021 Mar 25;1466453211000254. PMID: 23218172. |
dc.relation.references | ICRP, Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, Ortiz-López P, Mattsson S, Padovani R, Rogers A; Authors on behalf of ICRP. ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1- 144. Doi: 10.1177/0146645317717209. PMID: 29065694. |
dc.relation.references | IPSM/NRPB/CoR, 1992. National Protocol for Patient Dose Measurements in Diagnostic Radiology. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton. Disponible en: Diagnostic radiology: national protocol for patient dose measurements - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) |
dc.relation.references | International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA). IRPA Guiding Principles on radiation protection culture. 2014. Disponible en: IRPA - INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION. IRPA Guiding Principles on RP Culture (2014).pdf |
dc.relation.references | Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/). |
dc.relation.references | Järvinen H, Seuri R, Kortesniemi M, Lajunen A, Hallinen E, Savikurki-Heikkilä P, et al. Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT: a new approach with proposed values. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. julio de 2015;165(1-4):86- 90. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv044 |
dc.relation.references | Kanal, K. M., Butler, P. F., Chatfield, M. B., Wells, J., Samei, E., Simanowith, M., Golden, D., Gress, D. A., Burleson, J., Sensakovic, W. F., Strauss, K. J., & Frush, D. (2022). U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Pediatric CT Examinations. Radiology, 302(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021211241 |
dc.relation.references | Kleinman, P.L., Strauss, K.J., Zurakowski, D., Buckley, K.S., Taylor, G.A., 2010. Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 194, 1611–1619. |
dc.relation.references | Kalender W.A, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz W.A. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9: 323-328 |
dc.relation.references | Leung RS. Radiation protection of the child from diagnostic imaging. Curr Pediatr Rev.1 de enero de 2015;11(4):235-235-42 |
dc.relation.references | Linet, M. S., Kim, K. P., & Rajaraman, P. (2009). Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: Epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatric Radiology, 39(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1026-3 |
dc.relation.references | Mahesh M. Update on radiation safety and dose reduction in pediatric neuroradiology. Pediatr Radiol. 1 de septiembre de 2015;45 Suppl 3:S370-S370 |
dc.relation.references | Mcnitt-Gray, M. F., & Morin, R. L. (2004). Selecting a New Computed Tomography Scanner: Things to Consider. www.acr.org/dyna/?docdepartments/stand_ |
dc.relation.references | Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, LeeC, Kim KP, Howe NL; Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancer. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505.doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0.Epub 2012 Jun 7. PMID: 22681860; PMCID: PMC2418594. |
dc.relation.references | Ploussi, A., & Efstathopoulos, E. P. (2016). Importance of establishing radiation protection culture in Radiology Department. World Journal of Radiology, 8(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.142 |
dc.relation.references | Rehani, M. M., Szczykutowicz, T. P., & Zaidi, H. (2020). CT is still not a low-dose imaging modality. In Medical Physics (Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 293–296). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14000 |
dc.relation.references | Rehani, M. M., & Brady, Z. (2021). Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging special feature: editorial Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial 1. |
dc.relation.references | Samei, E., Christianson, O., 2014. Dose index analytics: more than a low number. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 11, 832–834. |
dc.relation.references | Satharasinghe, D. M., Jeyasugiththan, J., Wanninayake, W. M. N. M. B., & Pallewatte, A. S. (2021). Paediatric diagnostic reference levels in computed tomography: A systematic review. In Journal of Radiological Protection (Vol. 41, Issue 1, pp. R1–R27). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361- 6498/abd840 |
dc.relation.references | Seidenbusch, M.C., Schneider, K., 2014. Conversion coefficients for determining organ doses in paediatric pelvis and hip joint radiography. Pediatr. Radiol. 44, 1110– 1123. |
dc.relation.references | Schauer DA, Linton OW. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure--are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys. 2009 Jul;97(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000356672.44380.b7. PMID: 19509507 |
dc.relation.references | Siciliano, R. (2017). Radiological examinations in pediatric age. Annali Di Igiene Medicina Preventiva e Di Comunita, 29(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2017.2140 |
dc.relation.references | Siegel, M. J., Mhlanga, J. C., Salter, A., & Ramirez-Giraldo, J. C. (2021). Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between contrast-enhanced single- and dual energy abdominopelvic computed tomography in children as a function of patient size. Pediatric Radiology, 51(11), 2000–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021- 05127-3 |
dc.relation.references | Slovis TL. CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul;179(1):39-41. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790039. PMID: 12076901. |
dc.relation.references | Slovis TL, Berdon WE. The ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:217–317 |
dc.relation.references | Strauss, K. J., Racadio, J. M., Johnson, N., Patel, M., & Nachabe, R. A. (2015). Estimates of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric peripheral and abdominal fluoroscopically guided procedures. American Journal of Roentgenology, 204(6), W713–W719. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13630 |
dc.relation.references | Strauss KJ, Somasundaram E, Sengupta D, Marin JR, Brady SL. Radiation Dose for Pediatric CT: Comparison of Pediatric versus Adult Imaging Facilities. Radiology 2019;291(1) |
dc.relation.references | Vassileva, J., Rehani, M., Kostova-Lefterova, D., et al., 2015. A study to establish international diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 165, 70–80. |
dc.relation.references | Vawda, Z., Pitcher, R., Akudugu, J., & Groenewald, W. (2015). Diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography. South African Journal of Radiology, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v19i2.846 |
dc.relation.references | Watson, D.J., Coakley, K.S., 2010. Paediatric CT reference doses based on weight and CT dosimetry phantom size: local experience using a 64-slice CT scanner. Pediatr. Radiol. 40, 693–703 |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject.decs | Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X |
dc.subject.decs | Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
dc.subject.decs | Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico |
dc.subject.decs | Diagnostic Reference Levels |
dc.subject.proposal | Tomografía computarizada |
dc.subject.proposal | Diagnóstico |
dc.subject.proposal | Pediatría |
dc.subject.proposal | Computed tomography |
dc.subject.proposal | Diagnosis |
dc.subject.proposal | Pediatrics |
dc.title.translated | Reference levels of diagnosis in computed tomography in a high complexity pediatric hospital of the city of Bogotá |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa |
dc.type.content | Text |
dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
oaire.awardtitle | Niveles de referencia de diagnóstico en tomografía computarizada en un hospital pediátrico de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotá |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Estudiantes |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Investigadores |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Público general |
dc.contributor.orcid | Londoño Arévalo, Maria [0000-0002-1441-3354] |
dc.contributor.cvlac | Londoño Arévalo, María [https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001569205] |
Archivos en el documento
Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
![Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional](/themes/Mirage2//images/creativecommons/cc-generic.png)