Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento
Definición de un procedimiento orientado a la evaluación técnica de la arquitectura de red IoT definida por software
dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional |
dc.contributor.advisor | Cangrejo Aljure, Libia Denisse |
dc.contributor.advisor | Delgado Fernández, Tatiana |
dc.contributor.author | Vásquez Rodríguez, Jimmy Alexander |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-26T16:38:05Z |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-26T16:38:05Z |
dc.date.issued | 2022 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83143 |
dc.description | ilustraciones, graficas |
dc.description.abstract | De cara al desarrollo alcanzado en los últimos años en el cual paradigmas como Internet de las Cosas plantean retos en diferentes niveles tecnológicos, las redes de datos evolucionaron, haciéndose programables, más autónomas y con la posibilidad de prescindir de infraestructuras de hardware dedicadas. Surgieron así las redes Definidas por Software, SDN´s, mostrando beneficios relevantes para el despliegue de diversas soluciones y en particular para entornos IoT. Los entornos IoT demandan redes, programables, interoperables, escalables, seguras y que garanticen el cumplimiento de estándares de calidad del servicio. Todas estas demandas representan desafíos para las redes de datos, que han sido abordados en modelos de SDN, con la capacidad de gestionar eficientemente la información de los objetos IoT, garantizando aspectos como la seguridad, la calidad en los datos y la interoperabilidad. Por tanto, la idea de desarrollar un procedimiento de evaluación técnica sensible a parámetros técnicos de las arquitecturas IoT es un método que enriquece la toma de estas decisiones. Esta propuesta provee un procedimiento para la selección estructurada, definido en cuatro etapas, a saber, el análisis conceptual, el modelamiento del método de evaluación técnica, la comparación de los criterios y la validación de las alternativas, procedimiento orientado a la identificación de la mejor solución tecnológica. (Texto tomado de la fuente) |
dc.description.abstract | In view of the development achieved in recent years in which paradigms such as the Internet of Things pose challenges at different technological levels, data networks have evolved, becoming programmable, more autonomous and with the possibility of dispensing with dedicated hardware infrastructures. Thus, Software Defined Networks, SDNs, emerged, showing relevant benefits for the deployment of various solutions and in particular for IoT environments. IoT environments demand networks that are programmable, interoperable, scalable, secure and that guarantee compliance with service quality standards. All these demands represent challenges for data networks, which have been addressed in SDN models, with the ability to efficiently manage the information of IoT objects, guaranteeing aspects such as security, data quality and interoperability. Therefore, the idea of developing a technical evaluation procedure sensitive to technical parameters of IoT architectures is a method that enriches the making of these decisions. This proposal provides a procedure for the structured selection, defined in four stages, namely, the conceptual analysis, the modeling of the technical evaluation method, the comparison of the criteria and the validation of the alternatives, a procedure aimed at identifying the best technological solution. |
dc.format.extent | 111 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf |
dc.language.iso | spa |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
dc.subject.ddc | 000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::003 - Sistemas |
dc.subject.ddc | 620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería |
dc.title | Definición de un procedimiento orientado a la evaluación técnica de la arquitectura de red IoT definida por software |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Telecomunicaciones |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | ANGeoSc |
dc.description.degreelevel | Maestría |
dc.description.degreename | Magíster en Ingeniería - Telecomunicaciones |
dc.description.methods | • Metodología de Investigación Mixta • Metodología de Investigación Interdisciplinaria (MIR) • Metodología de revisión sistemática de la literatura (SLR) • Metodología del proceso analítico jerárquico (AHP) |
dc.description.researcharea | Redes definidas por software |
dc.description.researcharea | Internet de las Cosas |
dc.description.researcharea | Telecomunicaciones |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingeniería |
dc.publisher.place | Bogotá - Colombia |
dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
dc.relation.references | Aggarwal, S., & Kumar, N. (2019). Fog Computing for 5G-Enabled Tactile Internet: Research Issues, Challenges, and Future Research Directions. Mobile Networks and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01430-4 |
dc.relation.references | Ahmed, A. I. A., Gani, A., Hamid, S. H. A., Abdelmaboud, A., Syed, H. J., Habeeb Mohamed, R. A. A., & Ali, I. (2019). Service management for iot: Requirements, taxonomy, recent advances and open research challenges. IEEE Access, 7, 155472–155488. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2948027 |
dc.relation.references | Ahmed, E., Yaqoob, I., Hashem, I. A. T., Khan, I., Ahmed, A. I. A., Imran, M., & Vasilakos, A. v. (2017). The role of big data analytics in Internet of Things. Computer Networks, 129, 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2017.06.013 |
dc.relation.references | Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., Hashem, I. A. T., & Alotaibi, F. (2017). Internet of Things security: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 88, 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.04.002 |
dc.relation.references | Al-Hubaishi, M. (2019). Integrating SDN-Enabled Wireless Sensor Networks Into the Internet. http://www.iotlab.sakarya.edu.trhttp://www.iotlab. |
dc.relation.references | Anadiotis, A.-C. G., Morabito, G., Palazzo, S., & Member, S. (2016). An SDN-Assisted Framework for Optimal Deployment of MapReduce Functions in WSNs; An SDN-Assisted Framework for Optimal Deployment of MapReduce Functions in WSNs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2015.2496582 |
dc.relation.references | Andrew Lerner. (2021). SD-BRANCH Gartner 2021. Hype Cycle for Enterprise Networking, 2020 . https://blogs.gartner.com/andrew-lerner/2020/07/09/sd-branch/ |
dc.relation.references | Baktir, A. C., Ozgovde, A., & Ersoy, C. (2017). How Can Edge Computing Benefit from Software-Defined Networking: A Survey, Use Cases, and Future Directions. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 19(4), 2359–2391. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2717482 |
dc.relation.references | Bello, O., Zeadally, S., & Badra, M. (2017). Network layer inter-operation of Device-to-Device communication technologies in Internet of Things (IoT). Ad Hoc Networks, 57, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.06.010 |
dc.relation.references | Bera, S., Misra, S., & Vasilakos, A. v. (2017). Software-Defined Networking for Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2746186 |
dc.relation.references | BERNAT, R. (2015). OpenDaylight SDN controller platform. Tesis. |
dc.relation.references | Biolchini, J., Gomes Mian, P., Candida Cruz Natali, A., & Horta Travassos, G. (2005). Systematic Review in Software Engineering. |
dc.relation.references | Bizanis, N., & Kuipers, F. A. (2016). SDN and Virtualization Solutions for the Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE Access, 4, 5591–5606. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2607786 |
dc.relation.references | Boer, S. J. de (Sirp J. (1989). Decision methods and techniques in methodical engineering design. https://books.google.com/books/about/Decision_methods_and_techniques_in_metho.html?hl=es&id=VnmxAAAACAAJ |
dc.relation.references | Bojacá Acosta, Jorge. (2004). XYZ investigación pedagógica. Estado del arte. Semilleros. Logos-edit |
dc.relation.references | Borgia, E. (2014). The internet of things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Computer Communications, 54, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2014.09.008 |
dc.relation.references | Bröring, A., Seeger, J., Papoutsakis, M., Fysarakis, K., & Caracalli, A. (2020). Networking-aware IoT application development. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030897 |
dc.relation.references | Centeno, A. G., Manuel, C., Vergel, R., & Calderón, C. A. (2014). Controladores SDN , elementos para su selección y evaluación. Revista Telem@tica, 13(3), 10–20. |
dc.relation.references | Chen, B., Wan, J., Shu, L., Li, P., Mukherjee, M., & Yin, B. (2017). Smart Factory of Industry 4.0: Key Technologies, Application Case, and Challenges. IEEE Access, 6, 6505–6519. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682 |
dc.relation.references | Chica Pedraza, G. (2012). Estudio y Analisis de la Viabilidad de la Implementacion de Tecnologıa PLT UNAL. Tesis Universidad Nacional de Colombia. |
dc.relation.references | Citrix Systems. (2015). sdn-role-of-application-delivery-network-services-citrix. Citrix Systems, Inc |
dc.relation.references | Čolaković, A., & Hadžialić, M. (2018). Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues. Computer Networks, 144, 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017 |
dc.relation.references | Creswell, J. W., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. In South African Journal of Education. |
dc.relation.references | Darabseh, A., & Freris, N. M. (2019). A software-defined architecture for control of IoT cyberphysical systems. Cluster Computing, 22(4), 1107–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-02889-8 |
dc.relation.references | Das, R. K., Ahmed, N., Pohrmen, F. H., Maji, A. K., & Saha, G. (2020). 6LE-SDN: An Edge-Based Software-Defined Network for Internet of Things; 6LE-SDN: An Edge-Based Software-Defined Network for Internet of Things. IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2990936 |
dc.relation.references | Das, S., Talayco, D., & Sherwood, R. (2013a). Software-Defined Networking and OpenFlow. In Handbook of Fiber Optic Data Communication: A Practical Guide to Optical Networking: Fourth Edition. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401673-6.00017-9 |
dc.relation.references | Das, S., Talayco, D., & Sherwood, R. (2013b). Software-Defined Networking and OpenFlow. In Handbook of Fiber Optic Data Communication: A Practical Guide to Optical Networking: Fourth Edition (pp. 427–445). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401673-6.00017-9 |
dc.relation.references | DeCusatis, C. (2013). Network Architectures and Overlay Networks. Handbook of Fiber Optic Data Communication: A Practical Guide to Optical Networking: Fourth Edition, 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401673-6.00013-1 |
dc.relation.references | El-Mougy, A., Ibnkahla, M., & Hegazy, L. (2015). Software-defined wireless network architectures for the Internet-of-Things; Software-defined wireless network architectures for the Internet-of-Things. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCNW.2015.7365931 |
dc.relation.references | F. Almeida. (2018). STRATEGIES TO PERFORM A MIXED METHODS STUDY (ALMEIDA). Open Access Publishing Group . |
dc.relation.references | Farris, I., Taleb, T., Khettab, Y., & Song, J. (2019). A Survey on Emerging SDN and NFV Security Mechanisms for IoT Systems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(1), 812–837. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2862350 |
dc.relation.references | Felipe, D., & Gómez, B. (n.d.). OPENFLOW: EL PROTOCOLO DEL FUTURO* (Issue 93). |
dc.relation.references | Flauzac, O., Gonzalez, C., & Nolot, F. (2016). Developing a Distributed Software Defined Networking Testbed for IoT. Procedia Computer Science, 83(Ant), 680–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.151 |
dc.relation.references | Fortinet INC. (n.d.). Soluciones Secure SD-WAN: Rápidas, escalables & flexibles | Fortinet. Retrieved August 15, 2022, from https://www.fortinet.com/lat/products/sd-wan |
dc.relation.references | Fortinet INC. (2021). SD-WAN / SD-Branch Architecture for Enterprise. https://blog.fortinet.com |
dc.relation.references | Galluccio, L., Milardo, S., Morabito, G., & Palazzo, S. (2015). SDN-WISE: Design, prototyping and experimentation of a stateful SDN solution for WIreless SEnsor networks; SDN-WISE: Design, prototyping and experimentation of a stateful SDN solution for WIreless SEnsor networks. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM). https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2015.7218418 |
dc.relation.references | Gartner. (2021). Magic Quadrant Gartner . https://www.gartner.es/es/metodologias/magic-quadrant |
dc.relation.references | Gooley Jason. (2021). Cisco Software-Defined Network. Copyright © 2021 Cisco Systems, Inc. |
dc.relation.references | Guan, Z., Bertizzolo, L., Demirors, E., & Melodia, T. (2021). WNOS: Enabling Principled Software-Defined Wireless Networking; WNOS: Enabling Principled Software-Defined Wireless Networking. IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2021.3064824 |
dc.relation.references | H. Tobi, & Jarl K. Kampen. (2017). Research design the methodology for interdisciplinary (Tobi). |
dc.relation.references | Hajian, E., Khayyambashi, M. R., & Movahhedinia, N. (2022). A Mechanism for Load Balancing Routing and Virtualization Based on SDWSN for IoT Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3164693 |
dc.relation.references | Hatzivasilis, G., Fysarakis, K., Soultatos, O., Askoxylakis, I., Papaefstathiou, I., & Demetriou, G. (2018). The Industrial Internet of Things as an enabler for a Circular Economy Hy-LP: A novel IIoT protocol, evaluated on a wind park’s SDN/NFV-enabled 5G industrial network. Computer Communications, 119, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2018.02.007 |
dc.relation.references | Hu, F., Hao, Q., & Bao, K. (2014). A survey on software-defined network and OpenFlow: From concept to implementation. In IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials (Vol. 16, Issue 4, pp. 2181–2206). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2014.2326417 |
dc.relation.references | Ibrahim Naser, J., & Jawad Kadhim, A. (2020). Multicast routing strategy for SDN-cluster based MANET. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(5), 4447–4457. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4447-4457 |
dc.relation.references | Integrated cisco and unix network architectures. (2008). Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) Routing. Chapter 8. Static Routing Concepts. http://etutorials.org/Networking/Integrated+cisco+and+unix+network+architectures/Chapter+8.+Static+Routing+Concepts/Equal-Cost+Multi-Path+ECMP+Routing/ |
dc.relation.references | Interoperabilidad - Arquitectura TI. (n.d.). Retrieved August 5, 2022, from https://www.mintic.gov.co/arquitecturati/630/w3-propertyvalue-8117.html |
dc.relation.references | Jain, V., Yatri, V., Kanchan, & Kapoor, C. (2019). Software defined networking: State-of-the-art. Journal of High Speed Networks, 25(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.3233/JHS-190601 |
dc.relation.references | Jarraya, Y., Madi, T., & Debbabi, M. (2014). A survey and a layered taxonomy of software-defined networking. In IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials (Vol. 16, Issue 4, pp. 1955–1980). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2014.2320094 |
dc.relation.references | Juan.Rodrigo. (2019). Application-aware routing y SD-WAN. Teldat Blog - Connectando El Mundo SDWAN. https://www.teldat.com/blog/es/application-aware-routing-y-sd-wan/ |
dc.relation.references | Juniper INC. (2014). Understanding IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation. Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junose15.1/topics/concept/802.3ad-link-aggregation-understanding.html |
dc.relation.references | Kamal, Z., Mohammed, A., Sayed, E., & Ahmed, A. (2017). Internet of Things Applications , Challenges and Related Future Technologies Internet of Things Applications , Challenges and Related Future Technologies. World Scient Ific News, 67(February), 126–148. |
dc.relation.references | Karagiannis, V., Chatzimisios, P., Vazquez-Gallego, F., & Alonso-Zarate, J. (2015). A Survey on Application Layer Protocols for the Internet of Things. Transaction on IoT and Cloud Computing, 3(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.51613 |
dc.relation.references | Kirichek, R., Vladyko, A., Zakharov, M., & Koucheryavy, A. (2016). Model networks for Internet of Things and SDN; Model networks for Internet of Things and SDN. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACT.2016.7423280 |
dc.relation.references | Kitchenham, B. (2007). Source: “Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in SE”, Kitchenham et al Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. |
dc.relation.references | Kitchenham, B., & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. In Information and Software Technology (Vol. 55, Issue 12, pp. 2049–2075). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010 |
dc.relation.references | Kobayashi, M., Seetharaman, S., Parulkar, G., Appenzeller, G., Little, J., van Reijendam, J., Weissmann, P., & McKeown, N. (2014). Maturing of OpenFlow and Software-defined Networking through deployments. Computer Networks, 61, 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2013.10.011 |
dc.relation.references | Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Verissimo, P. E., Rothenberg, C. E., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015). Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1), 14–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2014.2371999 |
dc.relation.references | Kristen Gloss. (n.d.). IoT authentication and authorization. How to Use IoT Authentication and Authorization for Security. Retrieved August 16, 2022, from https://www.techtarget.com/iotagenda/feature/How-to-use-IoT-authentication-and-authorization-for-security |
dc.relation.references | Lantz, B., & O’Connor, B. (2015). A Mininet-based Virtual Testbed for Distributed SDN Development. Computer Communication Review, 45(4), 365–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785956.2790030 |
dc.relation.references | Le, N. T., Hossain, M. A., Islam, A., Kim, D.-Y., Choi, Y.-J., & Jang, Y. M. (2016). Survey of promising technologies for 5g networks. Mobile Information Systems, 2016, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2676589 |
dc.relation.references | León Garcia, O. (2000). Tomar decisiones dificiles. 305. |
dc.relation.references | Li, G., Wu, J., Li, J., Zhou, Z., & Guo, L. (2018). SLA-Aware Fine-Grained QoS Provisioning for Multi-Tenant Software-Defined Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2761553 |
dc.relation.references | Li, X., Li, D., Wan, J., Liu, C., & Imran, M. (2018). Adaptive Transmission Optimization in SDN-Based Industrial Internet of Things With Edge Computing; Adaptive Transmission Optimization in SDN-Based Industrial Internet of Things With Edge Computing. IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 5(3), 1351. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2797187 |
dc.relation.references | Liu, Y., Kuang, Y., Xiao, Y., & Xu, G. (2018). SDN-Based Data Transfer Security for Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(1), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2779180 |
dc.relation.references | M. del Socorro García. (2009). Métodos para la comparación de alternativas SAD. |
dc.relation.references | M. Fetters, & JF. Molina-Azorin. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research Starts a New Decade. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. |
dc.relation.references | M. S, G. (2009). Métodos para la comparación de alternativas SAD. Tesis UPCT. |
dc.relation.references | Maimó, L. F., Celdrán, A. H., Perales Gómez, Á. L., García Clemente, F. J., Weimer, J., & Lee, I. (2019). Intelligent and dynamic ransomware spread detection and mitigation in integrated clinical environments. Sensors (Switzerland), 19(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051114 |
dc.relation.references | Malcolm Betts. (2014). TR_SDN_ARCH_1.0_06062014. Open Networking Foundation. |
dc.relation.references | María, J., & Jiménez, M. (2010). EL PROCESO ANALÍTICO JERÁRQUICO (AHP). |
dc.relation.references | Marsden., C. T. (2017). Network neutrality: From policy to law to regulation. In Network neutrality: From policy to law to regulation. Manchester University Press. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073492282&partnerID=40&md5=68f85dfe22d42fe7ea6c21f95ec1a225 |
dc.relation.references | Martinez-julia, P., & Skarmeta, A. F. (2014). Empowering the Internet of Things with Software Defined Networking. IPv6 for the Internet of Things. iot6.eu/sites/default/files/imageblock/IoT6 - SDN - IoT.pdf |
dc.relation.references | McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., & Turner, J. (2013). OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.1145/1355734.1355746 |
dc.relation.references | Morabito, R., & Jimenez, J. (2020). IETF Protocol Suite for the Internet of Things: Overview and Recent Advancements. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 4(2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.001.1900014 |
dc.relation.references | Moreno, J. C. (2015). Estudio de las redes definidas por software y escenarios virtuales de red orientados al aprendizaje. |
dc.relation.references | Moreno, J. M. (2012). EL PROCESO ANALÍTICO JERÁRQUICO (AHP). FUNDAMENTOS, METODOLOGÍA Y APLICACIONES. |
dc.relation.references | Mouradian, C., Naboulsi, D., Yangui, S., Glitho, R. H., Morrow, M. J., & Polakos, P. A. (2018). A Comprehensive Survey on Fog Computing: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 20(1), 416–464. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2771153 |
dc.relation.references | Nguyen, K. T., Laurent, M., & Oualha, N. (2015). Survey on secure communication protocols for the Internet of Things. Ad Hoc Networks, 32, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.01.006 |
dc.relation.references | OSORIO, J. C. O. , J. (2008). Analitic hierarchic process and multicriteria decisión making. Application example. UTP. |
dc.relation.references | Perera, C., McCormick, C., Bandara, A. K., Price, B. A., & Nuseibeh, B. (2016). Privacy-by-Design Framework for Assessing Internet of Things Applications and Platforms. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Internet of Things - IoT’16, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2991561.2991566 |
dc.relation.references | Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2005). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences A PRACTICAL GUIDE. |
dc.relation.references | R. Burke Johnson, & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. (2004). A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher (Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie). |
dc.relation.references | Rashidi, B., Fung, C., & Bertino, E. (2017). A Collaborative DDoS Defence Framework Using Network Function Virtualization. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 12(10), 2483–2497. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2017.2708693 |
dc.relation.references | Red Hat, Inc. (2018). ¿Qué es la virtualización? Https://Www.Redhat.Com/Es/Topics/Virtualization/What-Is-Virtualization. https://www.redhat.com/es/topics/virtualization/what-is-virtualization |
dc.relation.references | Rehmani, M. H., Davy, A., Jennings, B., & Assi, C. (2019). Software Defined Networks-Based Smart Grid Communication: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 21(3), 2637–2670. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2908266 |
dc.relation.references | Saaty, T. L. (2008a). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. In Int. J. Services Sciences (Vol. 1, Issue 1). |
dc.relation.references | Saaty, T. L. (2008b). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. In Int. J. Services Sciences (Vol. 1, Issue 1). |
dc.relation.references | Saaty, T. L. (2008c). The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. In Rev. R. Acad. Cien. Serie A. Mat. VOL (Vol. 102, Issue 2). |
dc.relation.references | Salman, O., Elhajj, I., Chehab, A., & Kayssi, A. (2018). IoT survey: An SDN and fog computing perspective. Computer Networks, 143, 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.020 |
dc.relation.references | Sanjay, U., Steve. Woo, & Dan, P. (2018). SD_WAN_For_Dummies_VMware_2nd_SpecialEdition. Book. |
dc.relation.references | Serrano, D., & Guerri, J. (2015). Redes Definidas por Software (SDN): OpenFlow. 1–43. https://articulosit.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/sdn.pdf%0Ahttps://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/62801/SERRANO - Redes Definidas por Software (SDN): OpenFlow.pdf?sequence=3 |
dc.relation.references | Sher DeCusatis, C. J., & Carranza, A. (2013). Cloud Computing Data Center Networking. In Handbook of Fiber Optic Data Communication: A Practical Guide to Optical Networking: Fourth Edition (pp. 365–386). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401673-6.00015-5 |
dc.relation.references | Sikeridis, D., Papapanagiotou, I., Rimal, B. P., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2017). A Comparative Taxonomy and Survey of Public Cloud Infrastructure Vendors. http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.01476 |
dc.relation.references | Sood, K., Yu, S., & Xiang, Y. (2016). Software-Defined Wireless Networking Opportunities and Challenges for Internet-of-Things: A Review. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(4), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2480421 |
dc.relation.references | Souri, A., Norouzi, M., Asghari, P., Rahmani, A. M., & Emadi, G. (2020). A systematic literature review on formal verification of software-defined networks. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 31(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3788 |
dc.relation.references | Souza, R., Dias, K., & Fernandes, S. (n.d.). NFV Data Centers: A Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973568 |
dc.relation.references | Souza, R., Dias, K., & Fernandes, S. (2020). NFV Data Centers: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access, 8, 51713–51735. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973568 |
dc.relation.references | Sun, X., & Ansari, N. (2016). EdgeIoT: Mobile Edge Computing for the Internet of Things; EdgeIoT: Mobile Edge Computing for the Internet of Things. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600492CM |
dc.relation.references | Taherkordi, A., Zahid, F., Verginadis, Y., & Horn, G. (2018). Future Cloud Systems Design: Challenges and Research Directions. IEEE Access, 6, 74120–74150. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2883149 |
dc.relation.references | Theodorou, T., & Mamatas, L. (2017). CORAL-SDN: A Software-Defined Networking Solution for the Internet of Things. https://www.ansible.com/ |
dc.relation.references | Tsai, P.-W., Piccialli, F., Tsai, C.-W., Luo, M.-Y., & Yang, C.-S. (2017). Control frameworks in network emulation testbeds: A survey. Journal of Computational Science, 22, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2017.03.003 |
dc.relation.references | Vargas, M. G., Galeano Higuita, C., & Jaramillo Muñoz, A. (2015). EL ESTADO DEL ARTE- UNA METODOLOGÍA DE INVESTIGACIÓN. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, 20. |
dc.relation.references | Varyani, N., Zhang, Z.-L., & Dai, D. (2020). QROUTE: An Efficient Quality of Service (QoS) Routing Scheme for Software-Defined Overlay Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995558 |
dc.relation.references | Velasquez, K., Abreu, D. P., Assis, M. R. M., Senna, C., Aranha, D. F., Bittencourt, L. F., Laranjeiro, N., Curado, M., Vieira, M., Monteiro, E., & Madeira, E. (2018). Fog orchestration for the Internet of Everything: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-018-0086-3 |
dc.relation.references | Vučinić, M., Tourancheau, B., Rousseau, F., Duda, A., Damon, L., & Guizzetti, R. (2015). OSCAR: Object security architecture for the Internet of Things. Ad Hoc Networks, 32, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.12.005 |
dc.relation.references | Wette, P., Dräxler, M., Schwabe, A., Wallaschek, F., Zahraee, M. H., & Karl, H. (2014). MaxiNet: Distributed Emulation of Software-Defined Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFIPNetworking.2014.6857078 |
dc.relation.references | Wood, T., Ramakrishnan, K. K., Hwang, J., Liu, G., & Zhang, W. (2015). Toward a software-based network: integrating software defined networking and network function virtualization; Toward a software-based network: integrating software defined networking and network function virtualization. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2015.7113223 |
dc.relation.references | Xiong, B., Yang, K., Zhao, J., Li, W., & Li, K. (2016). Performance evaluation of OpenFlow-based software-defined networks based on queueing model. Computer Networks, 102, 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.03.005 |
dc.relation.references | Xu, T., Gao, D., Dong, P., Zhang, H., Heng Foh, C., & Chao, H.-C. (2016). Defending Against New-Flow Attack in SDN-Based Internet of Things. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2666270 |
dc.relation.references | Zerifi, M., Ezzouhairi, A., & Boulaalam, A. (2020). Overview on SDN and NFV based architectures for IoT environments: challenges and solutions; Overview on SDN and NFV based architectures for IoT environments: challenges and solutions. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDS50568.2020.9268779 |
dc.relation.references | Zhang, X., Yu, S., Zhang, J., & Xu, Z. (2019). Forwarding Rule Multiplexing for Scalable SDN-Based Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2), 3373–3385. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2882855 |
dc.relation.references | Zhu, T., Dhelim, S., Zhou, Z., Yang, S., & Ning, H. (2017). An architecture for aggregating information from distributed data nodes for industrial internet of things. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 58, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.08.018 |
dc.relation.references | Zunino, C., Valenzano, A., Obermaisser, R., & Petersen, S. (2020). Factory Communications at the Dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2020.103433 |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject.lemb | PERT (ANALISIS DE REDES) |
dc.subject.lemb | Pert (Network analysis) |
dc.subject.proposal | SDN-IoT |
dc.subject.proposal | Redes definidas por software |
dc.subject.proposal | Internet de las cosas |
dc.subject.proposal | SDN |
dc.subject.proposal | Interoperabilidad |
dc.subject.proposal | Seguridad |
dc.subject.proposal | QoS |
dc.subject.proposal | Software-defined network |
dc.subject.proposal | SDN-IoT |
dc.subject.proposal | Interoperability |
dc.subject.proposal | Security |
dc.subject.proposal | Data quality |
dc.subject.proposal | Internet of things |
dc.title.translated | Definition of a procedure oriented to the technical evaluation of the IoT network architecture defined by software |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa |
dc.type.content | Text |
dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Estudiantes |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Investigadores |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Maestros |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Público general |
Archivos en el documento
Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito