Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorJunca Burgos, Edgar German
dc.contributor.advisorBuitrago Gutiérrez, Giancarlo
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Benites, Andres Felipe
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T13:26:51Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T13:26:51Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83177
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: La colecistitis es la enfermedad inflamatoria aguda de la vesícula biliar, que se atribuye en la mayoría de los casos a la presencia de cálculos biliares. Es la causa más común de hospitalización por enfermedad gastrointestinal y la tercera causa de ingreso a los servicios de emergencias quirúrgicos. La colecistectomía laparoscópica es el manejo quirúrgico más frecuente. La escala de Parkland es una clasificación diseñada para estimar la dificultad quirúrgica dependiendo de los hallazgos intraoperatorios de la colecistectomía laparoscópica y así establecer el nivel de dificultad quirúrgica. El objetivo del presente estudio es establecer la asociación entre la escala de Parkland y la presencia de desenlaces post quirúrgicos relacionados con la realización de colecistectomía laparoscópica en pacientes con colecistitis aguda. Métodos: Estudio cohorte ambispectivo que incluye pacientes de 18 años o más con colecistitis aguda sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica en el Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia en el periodo de tiempo comprendido entre el año 2016 hasta el 2020. Resultados: 884 fueron intervenidos por diagnóstico de colecistitis aguda en el contexto clínico de urgencia médica, 680 fueron intervenidos por diagnóstico de cólico biliar en el contexto clínico de cirugía ambulatoria y 40 pacientes con diagnóstico de colecistitis aguda requirieron de conversión a cirugía abierta. En el análisis se determina que no hay asociación entre el Parkland y el desenlace compuesto en los pacientes con colecistitis aguda sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica, habiendo ajustado las demás variables. Conclusión: La escala de Parkland es una escala relativamente nueva en la literatura que ha mostrado rendimiento para predecir complicaciones postoperatorias como el riesgo de conversión a cirugía abierta y riesgo de lesión de la vía biliar, sin embargo aún faltan estudios con suficiente poder estadístico para poder determinar un rango de asociación entre desenlaces postquirúrgicos y el uso de esta escala. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Acute cholecystitis is an inflammatory disease of the gallbladder, which is attributed in most cases to the presence of gallstones. It is the most common cause of hospitalization for gastrointestinal disease and the third cause of admission to surgical emergency services. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most frequent surgical management. The Parkland scale is a classification designed to estimate surgical difficulty depending on the intraoperative findings of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and thus establish the level of surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to establish the association between the Parkland scale and the presence of post-surgical outcomes related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods: Ambispective cohort study at the National University Hospital of Colombia that includes patients aged 18 years or older with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the period from 2016 to 2020. Results: 884 were operated on due to a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in the clinical context of a medical emergency, 680 were operated on due to a diagnosis of biliary colic in the clinical context of ambulatory surgery, and 40 patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis required conversion to open surgery. The analysis determined that there is no association between parkland and the composite outcome in patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, having adjusted for the other variables. Conclusion: The Parkland scale is a relatively new scale in the literature that has shown performance in predicting postoperative complications such as the risk of conversion to open surgery and the risk of bile duct injury; however, more studies with sufficient statistical power are needed in order to determine a range of association between postoperative outcomes and the use of this scale.
dc.format.extent47 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.otherColecistectomía Laparoscópica
dc.subject.otherConversión a Cirugía Abierta
dc.subject.otherHospitalización
dc.subject.otherVesícula Biliar
dc.subject.otherCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
dc.subject.otherConversion to Open Surgery
dc.subject.otherHospitalization
dc.titleEscala de Parkland como factor pronóstico asociado a desenlaces post-quirúrgicos en pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica en el Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médica
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Cirugía General
dc.contributor.educationalvalidatorLosada Trujillo Natalia
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Cirugía Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicas
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Cirugía General
dc.description.researchareaCirugía general
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicina
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesDe Mestral, C., Rotstein, O. D., Laupacis, A., Hoch, J. S., Zagorski, B., Alali, A. S., & Nathens, A. B. (2014). Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Annals of Surgery, 259(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a5cf36
dc.relation.referencesGomes, C. A., Junior, C. S., Di Saverio, S., Sartelli, M., Kelly, M. D., Gomes, C. C., Gomes, F. C., Corrêa, L. D., Alves, C. B., & Guimarães, S. F. (2017). Acute calculous cholecystitis: Review of current best practices. World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 9(5), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v9.i5.118
dc.relation.referencesRegimbeau, J. M., Fuks, D., Pautrat, K., Mauvais, F., Haccart, V., Msika, S., Mathonnet, M., Scotté, M., Paquet, J. C., Vons, C., Sielezneff, I., Millat, B., Chiche, L., Dupont, H., Duhaut, P., Cossé, C., Diouf, M., & Pocard, M. (2014). Effect of postoperative antibiotic administration on postoperative infection following cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. JAMA, 312(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.7586
dc.relation.referencesFajardo, Roosevelt, Valenzuela, José Ignacio, Olaya, Sandra Catalina, Quintero, Gustavo, Carrasquilla, Gabriel, Pinzón, Carlos Eduardo, López, Catalina, & Ramírez, Juan Camilo. (2011). Costo-efectividad de la colecistectomía laparoscópica y de la abierta en una muestra de población colombiana. Biomédica, 31(4), 514-524. Retrieved January 13, 2023, from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-41572011000400006&lng=en&tlng=es
dc.relation.referencesGuevara O, Martinez JS, Junca EG, Ruiz OF, Vega O, Sanchez AY, Acosta GA (2022). Estándar clínico basado en la evidencia: Diagnóstico y tratamiento del paciente con colecistitis aguda calculosa en el Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia. Código IN-EC-11.
dc.relation.referencesMadni, T. D., Leshikar, D. E., Minshall, C. T., Nakonezny, P. A., Cornelius, C. C., Imran, J. B., Clark, A. T., Williams, B. H., Eastman, A. L., Minei, J. P., Phelan, H. A., & Cripps, M. W. (2018). The Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis. American journal of surgery, 215(4), 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.017
dc.relation.referencesKimura, Y., Takada, T., Strasberg, S. M., Pitt, H. A., Gouma, D. J., Garden, O. J., Büchler, M. W., Windsor, J. A., Mayumi, T., Yoshida, M., Miura, F., Higuchi, R., Gabata, T., Hata, J., Gomi, H., Dervenis, C., Lau, W. Y., Belli, G., Kim, M. H., Hilvano, S. C., … Yamashita, Y. (2013). TG13 current terminology, etiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 20(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0564-0
dc.relation.referencesKimura, Y., Takada, T., Kawarada, Y., Nimura, Y., Hirata, K., Sekimoto, M., Yoshida, M., Mayumi, T., Wada, K., Miura, F., Yasuda, H., Yamashita, Y., Nagino, M., Hirota, M., Tanaka, A., Tsuyuguchi, T., Strasberg, S. M., & Gadacz, T. R. (2007). Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 14(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1152-y
dc.relation.referencesYokoe, M., Hata, J., Takada, T., Strasberg, S. M., Asbun, H. J., Wakabayashi, G., Kozaka, K., Endo, I., Deziel, D. J., Miura, F., Okamoto, K., Hwang, T. L., Huang, W. S., Ker, C. G., Chen, M. F., Han, H. S., Yoon, Y. S., Choi, I. S., Yoon, D. S., Noguchi, Y., … Yamamoto, M. (2018). Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 25(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.515
dc.relation.referencesBrazzelli, M., Cruickshank, M., Kilonzo, M., Ahmed, I., Stewart, F., McNamee, P., Elders, A., Fraser, C., Avenell, A., & Ramsay, C. (2015). Systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of cholecystectomy versus observation/conservative management for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis. Surgical endoscopy, 29(3), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3712-6
dc.relation.referencesShaffer E. A. (2006). Gallstone disease: Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 20(6), 981–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.004.
dc.relation.referencesLoozen, C. S., Blessing, M. M., van Ramshorst, B., van Santvoort, H. C., & Boerma, D. (2017). The optimal treatment of patients with mild and moderate acute cholecystitis: time for a revision of the Tokyo Guidelines. Surgical endoscopy, 31(10), 3858–3863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5412-x
dc.relation.referencesChang, Y. R., Ahn, Y. J., Jang, J. Y., Kang, M. J., Kwon, W., Jung, W. H., & Kim, S. W. (2014). Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in patients with high comorbidity and re-evaluation of treatment efficacy. Surgery, 155(4), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.026
dc.relation.referencesDimou, F. M., Adhikari, D., Mehta, H. B., & Riall, T. S. (2017). Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 224(4), 502–511.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.021
dc.relation.referencesAmirthalingam, V., Low, J. K., Woon, W., & Shelat, V. (2017). Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too restrictive and patients with moderate and severe acute cholecystitis can be managed by early cholecystectomy too. Surgical endoscopy, 31(7), 2892–2900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5300-4
dc.relation.referencesCao, A. M., Eslick, G. D., & Cox, M. R. (2016). Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Surgical endoscopy, 30(3), 1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4325-4
dc.relation.referencesKutluer, N. (2020). Complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed due to acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science. https://doi.org/10.14744/less.2020.25901
dc.relation.referencesRadunovic, M., Lazovic, R., Popovic, N., Magdelinic, M., Bulajic, M., Radunovic, L., Vukovic, M., & Radunovic, M. (2016). Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Our Experience from a Retrospective Analysis. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 4(4), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.128
dc.relation.referencesGutt, C. N., Encke, J., Köninger, J., Harnoss, J. C., Weigand, K., Kipfmüller, K., Schunter, O., Götze, T., Golling, M. T., Menges, M., Klar, E., Feilhauer, K., Zoller, W. G., Ridwelski, K., Ackmann, S., Baron, A., Schön, M. R., Seitz, H. K., Daniel, D., Stremmel, W., … Büchler, M. W. (2013). Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Annals of surgery, 258(3), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599
dc.relation.referencesCoccolini, F., Catena, F., Pisano, M., Gheza, F., Fagiuoli, S., Di Saverio, S., Leandro, G., Montori, G., Ceresoli, M., Corbella, D., Sartelli, M., Sugrue, M., & Ansaloni, L. (2015). Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of surgery (London, England), 18, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083
dc.relation.referencesMadni, T. D., Nakonezny, P. A., Barrios, E., Imran, J. B., Clark, A. T., Taveras, L., Cunningham, H. B., Christie, A., Eastman, A. L., Minshall, C. T., Luk, S., Minei, J. P., Phelan, H. A., & Cripps, M. W. (2019). Prospective validation of the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis. American journal of surgery, 217(1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.005
dc.relation.referencesSisa-Segovia, C. G., Guggiari, B., Cacace, K., Acosta, R., & Luraschi, V. (2022). Application of the parkland grading scale in video laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Cirugía Paraguaya, 46(2), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.18004/sopaci.2022.agosto.7
dc.relation.referencesLee, W., Jang, J. Y., Cho, J. K., Hong, S. C., & Jeong, C. Y. (2020). Does surgical difficulty relate to severity of acute cholecystitis? Validation of the parkland grading scale based on intraoperative findings. American journal of surgery, 219(4), 637–641.
dc.relation.referencesGS, A. R., K, A., BD, M., HR, H., CS, A., Ali, M. A., & T, K. (2019). Pre-operative evaluation with parkland grading system in assessing difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and expectant operative and post-operative complications. International Journal of Surgery Science, 3(3), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2019.v3.i3a.141
dc.relation.referencesPeduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3
dc.relation.referencesNg, H. J., & Nassar, A. H. M. (2022). Reinterventions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration. A review of prospective data from 5740 patients. Surgical endoscopy, 36(5), 2809–2817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08568-x
dc.relation.referencesWarren, D. K., Nickel, K. B., Wallace, A. E., Mines, D., Tian, F., Symons, W. J., Fraser, V. J., & Olsen, M. A. (2017). Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Cholecystectomy. Open forum infectious diseases, 4(2), ofx036. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx036
dc.relation.referencesDen Hoed, P. T., Boelhouwer, R. U., Veen, H. F., Hop, W. C., & Bruining, H. A. (1998). Infections and bacteriological data after laparoscopic and open gallbladder surgery. The Journal of hospital infection, 39(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90240-7
dc.relation.referencesKim, H. J., Kang, S. H., Roh, Y. H., Kim, M. C., & Kim, K. W. (2017). Are prophylactic antibiotics necessary in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, regardless of patient risk?. Annals of surgical treatment and research, 93(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.93.2.76
dc.relation.referencesStatistical software for data science | Stata [Internet]. [Citado 30 de diciembre de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.stata.com
dc.relation.referencesNg, H. J., & Nassar, A. H. M. (2022). Reinterventions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration. A review of prospective data from 5740 patients. Surgical endoscopy, 36(5), 2809–2817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08568-x
dc.relation.referencesGriffiths, E. A., Hodson, J., Vohra, R. S., Marriott, P., Katbeh, T., Zino, S., Nassar, A. H. M., & West Midlands Research Collaborative (2019). Utilisation of an operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy, 33(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6281-2
dc.relation.referencesSugrue, M., Sahebally, S. M., Ansaloni, L., & Zielinski, M. D. (2015). Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0005-x
dc.relation.referencesSugrue, M., Coccolini, F., Bucholc, M., & Johnston, A. (2019). Intra-operative gallbladder scoring predicts conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: A WSES Prospective Collaborative Study. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0230-9
dc.relation.referencesHernandez, M., Murphy, B., Aho, J. M., Haddad, N. N., Saleem, H., Zeb, M., Morris, D. S., Jenkins, D. H., & Zielinski, M. (2018). Validation of the AAST EGS acute cholecystitis grade and comparison with the Tokyo Guidelines. Surgery, 163(4), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.041
dc.relation.referencesSutcliffe, R. P., Hollyman, M., Hodson, J., Bonney, G., Vohra, R. S., Griffiths, E. A., & CholeS study group, West Midlands Research Collaborative (2016). Preoperative risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a validated risk score derived from a prospective U.K. database of 8820 patients. HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 18(11), 922–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.015
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalColecistectomía
dc.subject.proposalLaparoscopia
dc.subject.proposalColecistitis
dc.subject.proposalColelitiasis
dc.subject.proposalEscala de Parkland
dc.subject.proposalParkland Score
dc.subject.proposalCholecystectomy
dc.subject.proposalLaparoscopy
dc.subject.proposalCholecystitis
dc.subject.proposalCholelithiasi
dc.title.translatedParkland scale as a prognostic factor associated with post-surgical outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the National University Hospital of Colombia
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito