Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorEspinosa Almansa, Carmelo José
dc.contributor.advisorRuiz Ávila, Héctor Andrés
dc.contributor.authorGomez Tobar, Juan Esteban
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-03T20:53:03Z
dc.date.available2023-02-03T20:53:03Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83300
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: La evaluación del estado de volemia y la sobrecarga de volumen, son consideraciones importantes en el manejo del paciente críticamente enfermo. Esta última condición ha sido reconocida como un problema con desenlaces adversos asociados. El auge del ultrasonido, ha llevado a crear nuevos índices de monitoreo hemodinámico; uno de los más destacados recientemente, ha sido el sistema VEXUS usado para evaluar la congestión venosa Objetivo principal: Evaluar si existe relación entre el grado de sobrecarga de volumen de los pacientes críticos y el nivel de congestión demostrado por sistema VEXUS en las primeras 72 horas de inicio de tratamiento en UCI y establecer factores asociados a la presencia de grados mayores de VEXUS. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, realizado en pacientes críticamente enfermos hospitalizados en UCI del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia en el periodo comprendido entre noviembre 2021- julio 2022. Resultados: Se incluyeron 123 pacientes, 73 (59.3%) fueron hombres, el promedio de edad en años fue 60,7 (RIQ 30). El volumen de fluidos acumulado al tercer día de hospitalización fue -151.5 ml (DE ± 2713). Los pacientes con congestión venosa sistémica catalogados con un puntaje de VEXUS ≥ 2 correspondieron al 22% (n=27) de la población. la edad mostró ser un factor protector con un (OR) de 0,97 (IC 95% 0.94 - 0,99; p: 0.02). La hipertensión pulmonar resultó ser un factor asociado a congestión con un OR de 6.55 (IC 95% 2,02 - 21,2; p.0.02); al igual que el balance acumulado de fluidos medido en litros al tercer día de la evaluación OR de 1.29 (Por cada litro de balance positivo - IC 95% 1.06 - 1,59; p. 0.008). Conclusión. La prevalencia de congestión venosa en una unidad de cuidados intensivos fue del 22.8%. El edema clínicamente evaluado al examen físico, no se asoció a grados de congestión venosa medidos por ecografía. Los factores asociados a congestión fueron la edad la hipertensión arterial pulmonar y el balance acumulado de 1 litro a las 72 horas de manejo. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractBackground The evaluation of the state of volemia and volume overload are important considerations in the management of the critically ill patient. This last condition has been recognized as a problem with associated adverse outcomes. The rise of ultrasound has led to the creation of new hemodynamic monitoring indices; one of the most prominent recently has been the VEXUS system used to assess venous congestion. Primary objective: To assess whether there is a relationship between the degree of volume overload in critically ill patients and the level of congestion demonstrated by the VEXUS system in the first 72 hours of treatment initiation in the ICU and to establish factors associated with the presence of higher degrees of VEXUS. Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study, carried out in critically ill patients hospitalized in the ICU of the National University Hospital of Colombia in the period between November 2021- July 2022. Results: 123 patients were included, 73 (59.3%) were men, the mean age in years was 60.7 (IQR 30). The accumulated fluid volume on the third day of hospitalization was -151.5 ml (SD ± 2713). Patients with systemic venous congestion classified as having a VEXUS score ≥ 2 corresponded to 22% (n=27) of the population. Age was shown to be a protective factor with an (OR) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.94 - 0.99; p: 0.02). Pulmonary hypertension turned out to be a factor associated with congestion with an OR of 6.55 (95% CI 2.02 - 21.2; p.0.02); as well as the accumulated balance of fluids measured in liters on the third day of the evaluation OR of 1.29 (For each liter of positive balance - 95% CI 1.06 - 1.59; p. 0.008). Conclusions. The prevalence of venous congestion in an intensive care unit was 22.8%. The clinically assessed edema on physical examination was not associated with degrees of venous congestion measured by ultrasound. The factors associated with congestion were age, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and the accumulated balance of 1 liter after 72 hours of treatment.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud
dc.titleRelación entre el balance hídrico y grado de congestión venosa medido por protocolo VEXUS en pacientes hospitalizados en unidad de cuidados intensivos del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialización
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Medicina Interna
dc.coverage.countryColombia
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicas
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Medicina Interna
dc.description.methodsEstudio de corte transversal.
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Administración
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesO’Connor ME, Prowle JR. Fluid Overload. Vol. 31, Critical Care Clinics. W.B. Saunders; 2015.p. 803–21.
dc.relation.referencesMarik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness? An Updated Meta-Analysis and a Plea for Some Common Sense*. 2013; Available from: www.ccmjournal.org
dc.relation.referencesDugar S, Choudhary C, Duggal A. Sepsis and septic shock: Guideline-based management. Vol. 87, Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. Cleveland Clinic Educational Foundation; 2020. p. 53–64.
dc.relation.referencesNieto ORP, Wong A, Fermín JL, López EIZ, Aguilar JAM, Tomas ED, et al. Aiming for zero fluid accumulation: First, do no harm. Vol. 53, Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy. Termedia Publishing House Ltd.; 2021. p. 162–78.
dc.relation.referencesBeaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, Bouchard J, Lamarche Y, Spiegel R, et al. Quantifying systemic congestion with Point-Of-Care ultrasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound Journal. 2020 Dec 1;12(1).
dc.relation.referencesBeaubien-Souligny W, Benkreira A, Robillard P, Bouabdallaoui N, Chassé M, Desjardins G, et al. Alterations in portal vein flow and intrarenal venous flow are associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: A prospective observational cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Oct 1;7(19).
dc.relation.referencesSeymour CW, Rosengart MR. Septic shock: Advances in diagnosis and treatment. Vol. 314, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. American Medical Association; 2015. p. 708–17.
dc.relation.referencesVan Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, et al. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Vol. 136, Circulation. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017. p. e232–68.
dc.relation.referencesPayen D, de Pont AC, Sakr Y, Spies C, Reinhart K, Vincent JL. A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care. 2008 Jun 4;12(3).
dc.relation.referencesMarik PE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Bittner EA, Sahatjian J, Hansell D. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med. 2017 May 1;43(5):625–32.
dc.relation.referencesRosenberg AL, Dechert RE, Park PK, Bartlett RH. Review of a large clinical series: Association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury: A retrospective review of the ARDSnet tidal volume study cohort. Vol. 24, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2009. p. 35–46.
dc.relation.referencesAcheampong A, Vincent JL. A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis. Crit Care. 2015 Jun 15;19(1).
dc.relation.referencesAlsous F, Khamiees M, DeGirolamo A, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Negative fluid balance predicts survival in patients with septic shock: A retrospective pilot study. Chest. 2000;117(6):1749–54.
dc.relation.referencesDe Almeida JP, Palomba H, Galas FRBG, Fukushima JT, Duarte FA, Nagaoka D, et al. Positive fluid balance is associated with reduced survival in critically ill patients with cancer. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):712–7.
dc.relation.referencesSánchez M, Jiménez-Lendínez M, Cidoncha M, et al: Comparison of fluid compartments and fluid responsiveness in septic and non-septic patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39:1022–1029
dc.relation.referencesHise AC da R, Gonzalez MC. Assessment of hydration status using bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in critical patients with acute kidney injury. Clinical Nutrition. 2018 Apr 1;37(2):695–700.
dc.relation.referencesGreenway C v, Lautt WW. Distensibility of hepatic venous resistance sites and consequences on portal pressure [Internet]. Available from: www.physiology.org/journal/ajpheart
dc.relation.referencesHuguet R, Fard D, d’Humieres T, Brault-Meslin O, Faivre L, Nahory L, et al. Three-Dimensional Inferior Vena Cava for Assessing Central Venous Pressure in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2018 Sep 1;31(9):1034–43.
dc.relation.referencesTestani JM, Khera A v., st. John Sutton MG, Keane MG, Wiegers SE, Shannon RP, et al. Effect of Right Ventricular Function and Venous Congestion on Cardiorenal Interactions During the Treatment of Decompensated Heart Failure. American Journal of Cardiology. 2010 Feb 15;105(4):511–6.
dc.relation.referencesIida N, Seo Y, Sai S, Machino-Ohtsuka T, Yamamoto M, Ishizu T, et al. Clinical Implications of Intrarenal Hemodynamic Evaluation by Doppler Ultrasonography in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Aug 1;4(8):674–82.
dc.relation.referencesIkeda Y, Ishii S, Yazaki M, Fujita T, Iida Y, Kaida T, et al. Portal congestion and intestinal edema in hospitalized patients with heart failure. Heart Vessels. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):740–51.
dc.relation.referencesEljaiek R, Cavayas YA, Rodrigue E, Desjardins G, Lamarche Y, Toupin F, et al. High postoperative portal venous flow pulsatility indicates right ventricular dysfunction and predicts complications in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Feb 1;122(2):206–14.
dc.relation.referencesMiklos AC, Li C, Sorrell CD, Lyon LA, Pielak GJ. An upper limit for macromolecular crowding effects. BMC Biophys. 2011 May 31;4(1).
dc.relation.referencesFlores-Villegas B, Flores-Lazcano I, de Lourdes Lazcano-Mendoza M, Baldomero Flores Villegas C. edema. enfoque clínico. Vol. 30, Med Int Méx. 2014.
dc.relation.referencesRothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
dc.relation.referencesWhitley, E., & Ball, J. Statistics review 3: hypothesis testing and P values. Critical Care, 2002. 6, 1-4.
dc.relation.referencesAli Z, Bhaskar SB. Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis. Vol. 60, Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. Indian Society of Anaesthetists; 2016. p. 662–9.
dc.relation.referencesDoğan NÖ. Bland-Altman analysis: A paradigm to understand correlation and agreement. Vol. 18, Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine. Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey; 2018. p. 139–41.
dc.relation.referencesKelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD. Methods in observational epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press;1996.
dc.relation.referencesKleinbaum DG, Klein M. Logistic regression: a self-learning text. 3rd ed. New York: Springer;2010.
dc.relation.referencesAngeli P, Bernardi M, Villanueva C, Francoz C, Mookerjee RP, Trebicka J, et al. EASL ClinicalPractice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Hepatol. 2018 Aug 1;69(2):406–60.
dc.relation.referencesRogers WK, Garcia L. Intraabdominal Hypertension, Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, and the Open Abdomen. Vol. 153, Chest. Elsevier Inc; 2018. p. 238–50.
dc.relation.referencesKDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease kidney I N T E R N A T I O N A L [Internet]. Available from: www.kidney-international.org
dc.relation.referencesRosenkranz, S., Howard, L. S., Gomberg-Maitland, M., & Hoeper, M. M. (2020). Systemic consequences of pulmonary hypertension and right-sided heart failure. Circulation, 141(8), 678-693.
dc.relation.referencesMalbrain MLNG, Marik PE, Witters I, Cordemans C, Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, et al. Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: A systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014 Nov 1;46(5):361–80.
dc.relation.referencesMagee G, Zbrozek A. Fluid overload is associated with increases in length of stay and hospital costs: Pooled analysis of data from more than 600 US hospitals. Clinic Economics and Outcomes Research. 2013 Jun 25;5(1):289–96.
dc.relation.referencesArgaiz, E. R., Koratala, A., & Reisinger, N. (2021). Comprehensive assessment of fluid status by point-of-care ultrasonography. Kidney360, 2(8), 1326.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/opendAccess
dc.subject.decsCuidados Críticos
dc.subject.decsCritical Care
dc.subject.decsMétodos
dc.subject.decsMethods
dc.subject.proposalSobrecarga de fluidos
dc.subject.proposalEnfermo crítico
dc.subject.proposalLesión renal aguda
dc.subject.proposalEdema
dc.subject.proposalFluid overload
dc.subject.proposalCritical illness
dc.subject.proposalAcute kidney injury
dc.subject.proposalEdema
dc.title.translatedRelationship between fluid balance and degree of venous congestion measured by the VEXUS protocol in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit of the National University Hospital of Colombia
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentDataPaper
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
oaire.awardtitleRelación entre el balance hídrico y grado de congestión venosa medido por protocolo VEXUS en pacientes hospitalizados en unidad de cuidados intensivos del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2762-6455


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento