Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorTamayo Arias, Johnny Alexander
dc.contributor.advisorBurgos, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCastro Benavides, Lina Maria
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T20:38:17Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T20:38:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84029
dc.descriptiongraficas, tablas
dc.description.abstractLas Instituciones de Educación Superior (instituciones de educación superior) han sido permeadas, por un lado, al avance tecnológico que trae consigo la cuarta revolución industrial, por otro lado, al cumplimiento de reglamentaciones plasmadas en las políticas de Estado/Nación, y soluciones/servicios requeridos por situaciones externas tan poderosas que las ha obligado a enfrentarse a una transformación digital en todas sus dimensiones. Aunque desde la literatura se evidencia el creciente interés en el área, aún son escasas las investigaciones que se desarrollan al respecto en el sector de la educación superior. Es necesario dilucidar el camino de la aplicación de los enfoques de la transformación digital al dominio instituciones de educación superior como un campo emergente que ha despertado interés durante el pasado reciente, desarrollando un modelo de implementación que permita describir complejas relaciones entre dimensiones intervinientes en un dominio educativo con soporte tecnológico. Se requieren realizar estudios de carácter empírico sobre la naturaleza de las interrelaciones entre las dimensiones involucradas (organizacional, socio-cultural y tecnológico) y su efecto en el nivel de madurez de la transformación digital de las instituciones de educación superior. Es por este motivo, que la presente investigación tiene como propósito abordar este gap mediante diseño de un modelo de implementación que permita describir complejas relaciones entre dimensiones y que además facilite el entendimiento e implementación de la transformación digital en instituciones de educación superior. Para alcanzar este objetivo, se realiza una revisión sistemática de literatura (RSL) que facilita la identificación de las dimensiones involucradas en los procesos de transformación digital y sus características principales. Luego, se crea un instrumento de medición de la transformación digital en las instituciones de educación superior, y a través del Método Delphi, 9 jueces expertos validan su contenido. Finalmente, se emplean los modelos de ecuaciones estructurales para comprobar la validez y ajuste del modelo propuesto. Una de las principales contribuciones de este trabajo radica en la confirmación de un modelo que integra la relación entre un conjunto de variables (organizacionales, socio-culturales y tecnológicas) que influyen positivamente en la Madurez de la transformación digital en las instituciones de educación superior. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractHigher Education Institutions have been permeated, on the one hand, to the technological advance that brings with it the fourth industrial revolution, on the other hand, to compliance with regulations embodied in State/Nation policies, and solutions/services required by external situations so powerful as the Covid-19 pandemic that have forced Higher Education Institutions to face a digital transformation in all its dimensions. Although the growing interest in the area is evident from the literature, there is still little research carried out in this regard in the higher education sector. It is necessary to elucidate the way of applying digital transformation approaches to the Higher Education Institutions domain as an emerging field that has aroused interest in the recent past, developing an implementation model that allows describing complex relationships between dimensions involved in an educational domain with technological support. It is necessary to carry out empirical studies on the nature of the interrelationships between the dimensions involved (organizational, sociocultural, and technological) and their effect on the level of maturity of the digital transformation of Higher Education Institutions. It is for this reason that this research aims to address this gap by creating an implementation model that allows describing complex relationships between dimensions and facilitates the understanding and implementation of digital transformation in Higher Education Institutions. To achieve this objective, a systematic literature review (RSL) is carried out to facilitates the identification of the dimensions involved in the digital transformation processes and their main characteristics. Subsequently, a digital transformation at HEIs measurement instrument is created, and through the Delphi Method, 9 expert judges validate its content. Finally, the structural equations model theory was used to check the validity and adjust the proposed implementation model. One of the main contributions of this work lies in the confirmation of a model that integrates the relationship between a set of variables (Organizational, Sociocultural and Technological) that positively influences the Maturity of digital transformation in HEIs.
dc.format.extentxviii, 159 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc370 - Educación::378 - Educación superior (Educación terciaria)
dc.titleTransformación digital en instituciones de educación superior. Modelo de implementación
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programManizales - Ingeniería y Arquitectura - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
dc.contributor.researchgroupGestión del Conocimiento, E-Business
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.methodsCuantitativa
dc.description.researchareaOrganizaciones, sistemas y gestión de la tecnología, información, el conocimiento, y la innovación tecnológica.
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura
dc.publisher.placeManizales, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizales
dc.relation.referencesAbdulfattah, O., & Almaghthawi, A. (2020). Towards an integrated model of data governance and integration for the implementation of digital transformation processes in the Saudi Universities. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(8), 588–593. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110873
dc.relation.referencesAdams, J. D. (2005). Transforming Work (J. D. Adams (ed.)). Miler Rivers Press.
dc.relation.referencesAiken, L. R. (1980). Educational and Psychological Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 955–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
dc.relation.referencesAiken, L. R. (2015). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
dc.relation.referencesAlmaraz, F. E., Fernando, A. :, & Almaraz Menéndez, E. (2013). Implicaciones del proceso de transformación digital en las Instituciones de Educación Superior. El caso de la Universidad de Salamanca. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
dc.relation.referencesAmador-Rodríguez, R. Y., & Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2014). Afirmaciones epistemológicas con “alta carga teórica” que pueden tener incidencia en la didáctica de las ciencias: un estudio comparativo. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 20(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-73132014000200011
dc.relation.referencesAmir, L., & Uri, M. (1986). Organizational Transformation. Praeger.
dc.relation.referencesArango Serna, M. D., Branch, J. W., Castro Benavides, L. M., & Burgos, D. (2019). Un modelo conceptual de transformación digital. Openergy y el caso de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 19(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks201819495107
dc.relation.referencesAslanova IV, & Kulichkina AI. (2020). Digital Maturity: Definition and Model. https://sloanreview.mit.edu.
dc.relation.referencesAzarenko, N. Y., Mikheenko, O. V, Chepikova, E. M., & Kazakov, O. D. (2018). Formation of Innovative Mechanism of Staff Training in the Conditions of Digital Transformation of Economy. 2018 IEEE International Conference “‘Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies’”, IT and QM and IS 2018, 764–768. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMQIS.2018.8525021
dc.relation.referencesBarcos, J. B. (2008). Reflexiones acerca de los sistemas de información universitarios ante los desafíos y cambios generados por los procesos de evaluación y acreditación. Avaliação: Revista Da Avaliação Da Educação Superior (Campinas), 13(1), 209–244.
dc.relation.referencesBartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638702300404
dc.relation.referencesBeckett, C., Eriksson, L., Johansson, E., & Wikström, C. (2017). Multivariate Data Analysis (MVDA). In Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: A Practical Approach. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895238.ch8
dc.relation.referencesBernal-García, M. I., Salamanca Jiméneza, D. R., Norton Perez, G., & Mónica Paola, Q. M. (2018). Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica. Educación Médica, 21(6), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.08.008
dc.relation.referencesBetchoo, N. K. (2016). Digital transformation and its impact on human resource management: A case analysis of two unrelated businesses in the Mauritian public service. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices for the Transformation of Societies (EmergiTech), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/EmergiTech.2016.7737328
dc.relation.referencesBharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., Venkatraman, N., Bharadwa, A., Sawy, O. A. El, Pavlou, P. A., Venkatraman, N., Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
dc.relation.referencesBlaschke, L., & Hase, S. (2016). heutagogy: A framework for creating 21st Century learners. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3
dc.relation.referencesBond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
dc.relation.referencesBondar, S., Hsu, J. C., Pfouga, A., & Stjepandic, J. (2017). Zachman framework in the agile digital transformation. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 5. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-779-5-67
dc.relation.referencesBozhko, Y. V, Maksimkin, A. I., Baryshev, G. K., Voronin, A. I., & Kondratyeva, A. S. (2016). Digital transformation as the key to synthesis of educational and innovation process in the research university. In K. Y., K. G., W. M., B. R., & C. A.V. (Eds.), 1st International Conference on Digital Transformation and Global Society, DTGS 2016 (Vol. 674, pp. 386–391). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_37
dc.relation.referencesBresinsky, M., & Von Reusner, F. (2018). GLOBE – Learn and innovate digitization by a virtual collaboration exercise and living lab. In B. E., B. A.L., & V. N. (Eds.), 6th EAI International Conference on Interactivity and Game Creation, ArtsIT 2017 and the 2nd International Conference on Design, Learning and Innovation, DLI 2017 (Vol. 229, pp. 273–281). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76908-0_26
dc.relation.referencesCalderón Hernández, G., Cuartas Castaño, J., & Álvarez Giraldo, C. M. (2010). Transformación organizacional y prácticas innovadoras de gestión humana. Innovar, 19(35), 151–166.
dc.relation.referencesCarbajal, A. B., & Tamari, K. (2017). Validez de contenido y confiabilidad inter-observadores de Escala Integral Calidad de Vida. Revista de Psicologia (Peru), 35(2), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201702.009
dc.relation.referencesCarcary, M., Doherty, E., & Conway, G. (2002). A dynamic capability approach to digital transformation – a focus on key foundational themes. Mycological Research, 106(11), 1323–1330.
dc.relation.referencesCastro Benavides, Lina María, Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(11), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
dc.relation.referencesCastro Benavides, Lina Maria, Tamayo Arias, J. A., & Burgos, D. (2021). Mistakes That Limit the Success of Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions. EDULEARN21 Proceedings, 1, 609–617. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.0169
dc.relation.referencesCastro Benavides, Lina María, Tamayo Arias, J. A., & Burgos, D. (2021). Behavioural Analysis of Digital Transformation in Latin American and Colombian Universities, Based on a General Identificacion of Variables. In D. Burgos & J. W. Branch Bedoya (Eds.), Radical Solutions for Digital Transformation in Latin American Universities (pp. 129–155). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3941-8_8
dc.relation.referencesCastro Benavides, Lina María, Tamayo Arias, J. A., Burgos, D., & Martens, A. (2022). Measuring digital transformation in higher education institutions – content validity instrument transformation. Applied Computing and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1108/ACI-03-2022-0069
dc.relation.referencesCepeda Carrión, G., & Roldán Salgueiro, J. L. (2003). Aplicando en la práctica la técnica PLS en la Administración de empresas. In Depósito de Investigación Universidad de Sevilla. https://core.ac.uk/display/161254889?utm_source=pdf&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=pdf-decoration-v1
dc.relation.referencesChandler, A. D. (1992). Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise. Economic Perspectives, 6(3), 79–100.
dc.relation.referencesChanias, S., & Hess, T. (2016). How digital are we? Maturity models for the assessment of a company’s status in the digital transformation. LMU Munich, 14.
dc.relation.referencesCohen, J. (1992). Quantitative Methods in Psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
dc.relation.referencesCorral, Y. (2009). Validez y Confiabilidad de los Instrumentos de Investigación para la Recolección de Datos. Revista Ciencias de La Educación, 19(33), 228–247.
dc.relation.referencesCortés-Reyes, É., Rubio-Romero, J. A., & Gaitán-Duarte, H. (2010). Statistical methods for evaluating diagnostic test agreement and reproducibility. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, 61(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.271
dc.relation.referencesCruz Ramírez, M., & Martínez Cepena, M. C. (2019). Origen y desarrollo de un índice de competencia experta : el coeficiente k. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de La Investigación Social, 16, 40–56.
dc.relation.referencesDemirkan, H., Spohrer, J. C., & Welser, J. J. (2016). Digital Innovation and Strategic Transformation. IT Professional, 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.115
dc.relation.referencesDevon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle-wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas-polston, E. (2007). A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 155–164.
dc.relation.referencesDevon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas-Polston, E. (2007). Clinical Scholarship A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability. In JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP (Vol. 39, Issue 2).
dc.relation.referencesDolganova, O. (2020). Multi-criteria assessment of university readiness for digital transformation. 1–9.
dc.relation.referencesDräger, J., Friedrich, J.-D., & Müller-Eiselt, R. (2014). Digital as the new normal-How digitalisation is changing higher education. Centrum Für Hochschulentwicklung, November, 4–11. http://www.che.de/downloads/Digital_as_the_new_normal.pdf
dc.relation.referencesEaton, C., & Stevens, M. L. (2020). Universities as peculiar organizations. Sociology Compass, 14(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12768
dc.relation.referencesElgin, D. S., & Bushnell, R. A. (1977). Limits to the Management of Large Complex Systems. The Futurist, 11(6), 336–349.
dc.relation.referencesEscobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). VALIDEZ DE CONTENIDO Y JUICIO DE EXPERTOS: UNA APROXIMACIÓN A SU UTILIZACIÓN. Avances En Medición, 6, 27–36.
dc.relation.referencesEscurra, L. M. (1988). Cuantificación de la validez de contenido por criterio de jueces. Revista de Psicología, 6(1–2), 103–111.
dc.relation.referencesFaria, J A, & Nóvoa, H. (2017). Digital transformation at the university of porto. In D. M., C. M., & Z. S. (Eds.), 8th International Conference on Exploring Service Science, IESS 2017 (Vol. 279, pp. 295–308). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_24
dc.relation.referencesFaria, José António, & Nóvoa, H. (2017). Digital transformation at the university of porto. 8th International Conference on Exploring Service Science, IESS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 279, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_24
dc.relation.referencesFerlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The New Public Management in Action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198289029.001.0001
dc.relation.referencesFernández, A., Gómez, B., Binjaku, K., & Meçe, E. K. (2023). Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review. In Education and Information Technologies (Issue 0123456789). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0
dc.relation.referencesFischer, M., Imgrund, F., Janiesch, C., & Winkelmann, A. (2020). Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: Defining meta objectives using business process management. Information and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103262
dc.relation.referencesFitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2013). Embracing Digital Technology A New Strategic Imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 1–15.
dc.relation.referencesFleacă, E. (2017). Embedding Digital Teaching and Learning Practices in the Modernization of Higher Education Institutions. 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017, 17(54), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/54/s22.006
dc.relation.referencesGarner. (2023). Gartner Virtual Briefings. https://webinar.gartner.com/440676/agenda/session/1041012
dc.relation.referencesGobble, M. M. (2018). Digital Strategy and Digital Transformation. Research-Technology Management, 61(5), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1495969
dc.relation.referencesGollhardt, T., Halsbenning, S., Hermann, A., Karsakova, A., & Becker, J. (2020). Development of a Digital Transformation Maturity Model for IT Companies. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE 22nd Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2020, 1, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI49978.2020.00018
dc.relation.referencesGrab, B., Olaru, M., & Gavril, R. (2019). Self-managed as a key to unlocking digital transformation in business management. Quality-Access to Success, 20(2), 280–286.
dc.relation.referencesGurbaxani, V., & Dunkle, D. (2019). Gearing up for successful digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00017
dc.relation.referencesHair, Joe F, Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). The Results of PLS-SEM Article information. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
dc.relation.referencesHair, Joseph F., M.Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). In Sage (Ed.), Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. (Second). SAGE Publications Inc.
dc.relation.referencesHair, Joseph F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
dc.relation.referencesHair, Joseph F, M.Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In SAGE.
dc.relation.referencesHarmsen, F., Proper, H. A., & Kok, N. (2009). Informed Governance of Enterprise Transformations. Advances in Enterprise Engineering II, 28, 155–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01859-6_9
dc.relation.referencesHarvard Business Review Analytic Services. (2015). Driving Digital Transformation : New Skills for Leaders , New Role for the Cio. Harvard Business Review (HBR), 1–16. https://hbr.org/resources/pdfs/comm/RedHat/RedHatReportMay2015.pdf
dc.relation.referencesHasson, F., Sinead, K., & Hugh, M. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
dc.relation.referencesHenriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2015). The Shape of Digital Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review. MCIS 2015 Proceedings, 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.LAB.0000092228.51605.6A
dc.relation.referencesHenseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
dc.relation.referencesHernandez-Nieto, R. (2002). Contributions to Statistical Analysis: The Coefficients of Proportional Variance, Content Validity and Kappa (C. I. P. Platform (ed.)).
dc.relation.referencesHess, T, Benlian, A., Matt, C., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123–139. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011959099&partnerID=40&md5=6fb58c898148e5fa1970287aa0174399
dc.relation.referencesHess, Thomas, Benlian, A., Matt, C., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2016(June), 17–33.
dc.relation.referencesHiekkanen, K., Helenius, M., Korhonen, J., & Patricio, E. (2012). Business and IT: Beyond Alignment. Proceedings of the 8Th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance, 217–224.
dc.relation.referencesHulla, M., Karre, H., Hammer, M., & Ramsauer, C. (2019). A Teaching Concept Towards Digitalization at the LEAD Factory of Graz University of Technology. In A. M.E. & T. T. (Eds.), 21st International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2018 (Vol. 917, pp. 393–402). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11935-5_38
dc.relation.referencesi-scoop. (2018). Business Process Optimization/Management and Digital.
dc.relation.referencesIDC infodoc. (2019). Madurez de las universidades latinoamericanas en la Transformación Digital. IDC Latin America Integrated Marketing Programs. https://info.microsoft.com/rs/157-GQE-382/images/LA17021_IDC Latin America_InfoDoc_Education 2017_Microsoft -ESP_MGC0001638.pdf
dc.relation.referencesJuárez-Hernández, L. G., & Tobón, S. (2018). Análisis de los elementos implícitos en la validación de contenido de un instrumento de investigación Analysis of the elements implicit in the validation of the content of a research instrument. Espacios, 39(53), 23–30. https://www.revistaespacios.com/cited2017/cited2017-23.pdf
dc.relation.referencesKaminskyi, O. Y., Yereshko, Y. O., & Kyrychenko, S. O. (2018). Digital transformation of University Education in Ukraine: trajectories of development in the conditions of new technological and economic order. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 64(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v64i2.2083
dc.relation.referencesKampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Devine, J. (2015). Promoción de un Aprendizaje Eficaz en la Era Digital. https://doi.org/10.2791/54070
dc.relation.referencesKilmann, R. ., Covin, T. ., & Associates. (1988). Corporate transformation: revitalizing organizations for a competitive world (Jossey-Bass (ed.)).
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, Babara, Charters, S., Budgen, D., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Linkman, S., Jørgensen, M., Mendes, E., & Visaggio, G. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Proceeding of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering - ICSE ’06, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, Barbara, & Ebse, C. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering Executive summary. https://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~laemmel/esecourse/slides/slr.pdf
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, Barbara, Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
dc.relation.referencesKrell, T., & Gale, J. (2005). E-business migration : a process model. 18(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810510589552
dc.relation.referencesKuzu, Ö. H. (2020). Digital Transformation in Higher Education: A Case Study on Strategic Plans. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 29(3), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-29-3-9-23
dc.relation.referencesLawrence, C. (2005). The Transformation of IT Governance: A Neo-lnstitutional Interpretation [University of London]. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/1892/1/U213616.pdf
dc.relation.referencesLawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Pshycology, 28, 569–575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
dc.relation.referencesLewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change. In Human Relations (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
dc.relation.referencesLópez Segrera, F. (2008). Tendencias de la educación superior en el mundo y en América Latina y el Caribe. Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, El Caribe, España y Portugal, 13(1414–4077), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10732
dc.relation.referencesLópez Vidal, J. F., & Africa Calvo, L. (2019). Delphy Method validation and design of a questionnaire to assess physical activity characteristics in elderly from residences. Retos, 36, 515–520. www.retos.org
dc.relation.referencesMagdalena, L., Sierra, P., Enselmina, M., & Vargas, M. (2015). Análisis de validez de contenido de un instrumento de transferencia de Tecnología Universidad-Industria de Baja California, México. XX Congreso Internacional de Contaduría, Administración e Informática. http://congreso.investiga.fca.unam.mx/docs/xx/docs/2.02.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMartín García, A. V., García del Dujo, Á., & Muñoz Rodríguez, J. M. (2014). Factores determinantes de adopción de blended learning en educación superior. Adapta ción del modelo UTAUT. Educacion XX1, 17(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17.2.11489
dc.relation.referencesMartínez A, M., & Fierro M., E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS-SEM en la gestión del conocimiento : un enfoque técnico práctico. Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación y El Desarrollo Educativo, 8, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.336
dc.relation.referencesMartínez Ávila, M., & Fierro Moreno, E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS-SEM en la gestión del conocimiento: un enfoque técnico práctico / Application of the PLS-SEM technique in Knowledge Management: a practical technical approach. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación y El Desarrollo Educativo, 8(16), 130–164. https://doi.org/10.23913/RIDE.V8I16.336
dc.relation.referencesMatt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital Transformation Strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
dc.relation.referencesMcKinsey & Company. (2020). The recovery will be digital. McKinsey Global Publishing, August, 172. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business Functions/McKinsey Digital/Our Insights/How six companies are using technology and data to transform themselves/The-next-normal-the-recovery-will-be-digital.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMengual-andrés, S., Roig-vila, R., & Mira, J. B. (2016). Delphi study for the design and validation of a questionnaire about digital competences in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0009-y
dc.relation.referencesMiranda Torrez, J. (2017). Las Teorías y la Conceptualización de las Capacidades Dinámicas Estratégicas y Organizacionales. XXII Congreso Internacional de Contaduría, Administración e Informática.
dc.relation.referencesMosley, M., Development, E., Brackett, M., Production, E., Earley, S., Editor, A., Henderson, D., & Sponsor, P. (2016). The DAMA Guide to The Data Management Body of Knowledge ( DAMA-DMBOK Guide ) First Edition.
dc.relation.referencesMuzyka, D., Koning, A. de, & Churchill, N. (1995). On Transformation and Building the Entrepreneurial Corporation. European Managemente Journal, 13(4), 346–362.
dc.relation.referencesNadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 233–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7
dc.relation.referencesNitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modelling, Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
dc.relation.referencesNoreña, D. (2020). Diccionario de Términos de PLS-SEM.
dc.relation.referencesOkoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management, 42(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
dc.relation.referencesOlanrewaju, T., Smaje, K., & Willmott, P. (2014). The seven traits of effective digital enterprises. McKinsey&Company, 0–4.
dc.relation.referencesPalos-Sanchez, P., Reyes-Menendez, A., & Saura, J. R. (2019). Models of adoption of information technology and cloud computing in organizations. Informacion Tecnologica, 30(3), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642019000300003
dc.relation.referencesPanichkina, M. V., Sinyavskaya, I. A., & Shestova, E. V. (2019). Challenges of Professional Adaptation of University Graduates in Response to the Economics’ Digital Transformation. Proceedings of 2018 17th Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on Planning and Teaching Engineering Staff for the Industrial and Economic Complex of the Region, PTES 2018, 44–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/PTES.2018.8604207
dc.relation.referencesPedrosa, I., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & García-Cueto, E. (2014). Evidencias sobre la Validez de Contenido: Avances Teóricos y Métodos para su Estimación [Content Validity Evidences: Theoretical Advances and Estimation Methods]. Acción Psicológica, 10(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11820
dc.relation.referencesPenfield, R. D., & Giacobbi, P. R. (2004). Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Applying a Score Confidence Interval to Aiken’s Item Content-Relevance Index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804
dc.relation.referencesPenprase, B. E. (2018). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Vallejo, L., Vilariño-Corella, C., & Ronda-Pupo, G. (2017). The organizational change as tool to facilitate the implementation of the strategy. Ingeniería Industrial, 38(3), 223–332. http://www.rii.cujae.edu.cu
dc.relation.referencesPérez Gama, J. A. (2019). Intelligent educational dual architecture for university digital transformation. 48th Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2018, 2018-Octob. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658844
dc.relation.referencesPeterson, M. (2012). EFL learner collaborative interaction in Second Life. ReCALL, 24(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000279
dc.relation.referencesPinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other. In Social Studies of Science (Vol. 14, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
dc.relation.referencesPwC. (2018). The 2018 digital university. Staying relevant in the digital age. 1–18.
dc.relation.referencesRamírez Montoya, M. S. (2020). Transformación Digital e Innovación Educativa en Latinoamérica en el Marco del COVID-19. Campus Virtuales : Revista Científica Iberoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 9, 123–139.
dc.relation.referencesReis, J., Amorim, M., Melao, N., & Matos, P. (2018). Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research. Springer Nature, 206(March), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36981-0
dc.relation.referencesRiemer, K., Uri, G., Hamann, J., Gilchriest, B., & Teixeira, M. (2015). Digital Disruptive Intermediaries. 137.
dc.relation.referencesRodrigues, L. S. (2017). Challenges of digital transformation in higher education institutions: A brief discussion. 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference - Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic Development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth, IBIMA 2017, 2017-Janua(November 2017), 4490–4493. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048618825&partnerID=40&md5=65525232d18dbc0ae37a733eb45b100d
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez-Abitia, G., & Bribiesca-Correa, G. (2019). Modelo de Transformación Digital en las Empresas Modelo de Transformación Digital en las Empresas. XXXII Congreso Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Abitia, G., & Bribiesca-Correa, G. (2021). Assessing digital transformation in universities. Future Internet, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13020052
dc.relation.referencesRosing, M. Von, & Etzel, G. (2020). Introduction to The Digital Transformation Lifecycle Overview of the Digital Transformation Lifecycle. 2018, 92–99.
dc.relation.referencesRossmann, A., & Reutlingen, H. (2018). Digital Maturity: Conceptualization and Measurement Model Social media View project Startups in cooperation with incumbent firms View project Digital Maturity: Conceptualization and Measurement Model. Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, 1–9. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/04/ch-digital-readiness-assessment-en.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesRubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. In Social Work Research (Vol. 27, Issue 2). https://academic.oup.com/swr/article/27/2/94/1659075
dc.relation.referencesSampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Baptista, M. del P. (2014). Metodologia de la Investigación (MacGrawHill (ed.); Sexta, Vol. 1, Issue 4).
dc.relation.referencesSandhu, G. (2018). The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Transformation of the Universities. In A. K. J.P., S. G., K. S., & G. R. (Eds.), 5th IEEE International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services, ETTLIS 2018 (pp. 292–296). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETTLIS.2018.8485258
dc.relation.referencesSandhu, Gurdish. (2018). The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Transformation of the Universities. 2018 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS), 292–296.
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi Surveys Using Nonparametric Statistical Techniques *. 28(3).
dc.relation.referencesSchwab, K. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution
dc.relation.referencesSchwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P., Duman, D., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). How does the digital transformation affect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership. Management Revue, 29(2), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-114
dc.relation.referencesScott, P. (1993). The Idea of the University in the 21St Century: A British Perspective. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1993.9973945
dc.relation.referencesSebastián, M. G. D. B., Guede, J. R. S., & Antonovica, A. (2022). Tam Versus Utaut Models: a Contrasting Study of Scholarly Production and Its Bibliometric Analysis. TECHNO Review. International Technology, Science and Society Review / Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad, 11. https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4445
dc.relation.referencesShaheen, S., & Khatoon, S. (2017). Impact of ICT Enriched Modular Approach on Academic Achievement of Biology Students. 11(1).
dc.relation.referencesShamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., Altman, D. G., Booth, A., Chan, A. W., Chang, S., Clifford, T., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Gøtzsche, P. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Groves, T., Helfand, M., … Whitlock, E. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ (Online), 349(January), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
dc.relation.referencesShmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049
dc.relation.referencesSingh, A., & Hess, T. (2017). How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(1), 1–17.
dc.relation.referencesSlocumb, E. M., & Cole, F. L. (1991). A practical approach to content validation. Applied Nursing Research, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80097-7
dc.relation.referencesSolis, B., Li, C., & Szymanski, J. (2014). Digital Transformation. Altimeter Group. https://pdfslide.net/technology/altimeter-brian-solis-digital-transformation-559c076318dcb.html
dc.relation.referencesStolze, A., Sailer, K., & Gillig, H. (2018). Entrepreneurial mindset as a driver for digital transformation - A novel educational approach from university-industry interactions. In A. M.P.C., C. C., A.-Y.-O. M., & A. M.P.C. (Eds.), 13th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE 2018 (Vols. 2018-Septe, pp. 806–813). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055453507&partnerID=40&md5=e7d4b0ddb7aa113aeec05f5e02aff738
dc.relation.referencesSugarman, B. (2001). PUSH and PULL theories in change management: Gateways to understanding organisational learning. May, 24.
dc.relation.referencesSugarman, B. (2015). A Hybrid Theory of Organizational Transformation. Research in Organizational Change and Development, iii. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3016(06)16002-4
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, C, & Staib, A. (2018). Digital disruption “syndromes” in a hospital: Important considerations for the quality and safety of patient care during rapid digital transformation. Australian Health Review, 42(3), 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16294
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, Clair, & Staib, A. (2018). Digital disruption ‘syndromes’ in a hospital: important considerations for the quality and safety of patient care during rapid digital transformation. Australian Health Review, 42(3), 294. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16294
dc.relation.referencesTaherdoost, H., Business, H., Sdn, S., Group, C., & Lumpur, K. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology ; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for. 5(2), 18–27.
dc.relation.referencesTastle, W J, & Wierman, M. J. (2006). An information theoretic measure for the evaluation of ordinal scale data. 38(3), 487–494.
dc.relation.referencesTastle, William J., & Wierman, M. J. (2007). Consensus and dissention: A measure of ordinal dispersion. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 45(3), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.06.024
dc.relation.referencesTay, H. L., & Low, S. W. K. (2017). Digitalization of learning resources in a HEI – a lean management perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(5), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0193
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_689-1
dc.relation.referencesTeichert, R. (2019). Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(6), 1673–1687. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061673
dc.relation.referencesThoring, A., Rudolph, D., & Vogl, R. (2018). The digital transformation of teaching in higher education from an academic’s point of view: An explorative study. In Z. P. & I. A. (Eds.), 5th International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, LCT 2018 Held as Part of HCI International 2018: Vol. 10924 LNCS (pp. 294–309). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91743-6_23
dc.relation.referencesTichy, N. M. (1982). Political and Cultural Keys. Organizational Dynamics, 11(2), 59–80.
dc.relation.referencesValderrama, A. (2004). Teoría y crítica de la construcción social de la tecnología. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 23, 217–233. http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/recs/article/view/11278/11937
dc.relation.referencesVillaverde, K., & Kosheleva, O. (2010). Towards a New Justification of the Tastle-Wierman ( TW ) Dissention and Consensus Measures ( and Their Potential Role in Education ). Reunión Anual 2010 de La Sociedad Norteamericana de Procesamiento de La Información Difusa, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109 / NAFIPS.2010.5548273
dc.relation.referencesWade, M. (2015). Digital Business Transformation A Conceptual Framework. Global Center for Digital Business Transformation, June. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vala-afshar/accenture-digital-7-digital-business-transformation-lessons_b_6622648.html
dc.relation.referencesWieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., & Rolland, C. (2006). Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion. Requirements Engineering, 11(1), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0021-6
dc.relation.referencesWildan Zulfikar, M., Umri, H. U. B. A., Hashim, A. I. B., & Dahlan, A. R. A. (2018). A business case for digital transformation of a Malaysian-based University. 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World, ICT4M 2018, 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4M.2018.00028
dc.relation.referencesWorld Economic Forum. (2017). Realizing Human Potential in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: An Agenda for Leaders to Shape the Future of Education, Gender and work. World Economic Forum White Paper, July, 22.
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2009). Case study research : design and methods. In Applied social research methods series ; Vol. 5. (Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9e
dc.relation.referencesZamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., & Alavi-, H. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study : Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(5), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
dc.relation.referencesZamora-de-Ortiz, M. S., Serrano-Pastor, F. J., & Martínez-Segura, M. J. (2020). Content validity of the A-SIWT (ask, see, interpret, walk, tell) teaching model by expert judgment. Formacion Universitaria, 13(3), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062020000300043
dc.relation.referencesZartha Sossa, J. W., Montes Hincapié, J. M., Toro Jaramillo, I. D., & Villada, H. S. (2014). Método Delphi-Propuesta para el cálculo del número de expertos en un estudio Delphi sobre empaques biodegradables al 2032. Espacios, 35(13), 10.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalTransformación digital
dc.subject.proposalInstituciones de educación superior
dc.subject.proposalModelo de implementación
dc.subject.proposalModelo de ecuaciones estructurales
dc.subject.proposalDigital transformation
dc.subject.proposalHigher education institution
dc.subject.proposalImplementation model
dc.subject.proposalStructural equation model
dc.subject.unescoCambio tecnológico
dc.subject.unescoTechnological change
dc.title.translatedDigital transformation in higher education institutions. Implementation model
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentImage
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentAdministradores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentConsejeros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticos
dc.description.curricularareaIndustrial, Organizaciones Y Logística.Sede Manizales
dc.contributor.orcidCastro Benavides, Lina María [0000-0002-4280-7529]
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000453293
dc.contributor.researchgatehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Castro-Benavides-2
dc.contributor.researchgatehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lina-Castro-Benavides
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=F_LBqOYAAAAJ&hl=es


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito