Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Evaluación de la adopción del teletrabajo y sus implicaciones en la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones de Medellín

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorBotero Botero, Sergio
dc.contributor.advisorMontoya Restrepo, Iván Alonso
dc.contributor.authorSilva Cortés, Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T14:56:21Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T14:56:21Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84856
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas, etc.
dc.description.abstractEl teletrabajo trae consigo múltiples beneficios para los empleados y para la sostenibilidad de las empresas, su evaluación e implementación tomó gran relevancia durante la pandemia de COVID-19, al impulsar el teletrabajo obligatorio, marcando el comienzo de una nueva era en el funcionamiento de las empresas, y dejando preguntas sobre su evaluación y adopción, ya que un significativo número de empresas sigue siendo reacio a adoptar este modo de funcionamiento operativo y laboral dentro de las mismas; mientras que otras continúan bajo este modelo después de su evaluación, al encontrar numerosas ventajas. La presente tesis doctoral evaluó la adopción del teletrabajo y sus efectos sobre la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones en Medellín, Colombia. Para llevar acabo esto, en primer lugar, se encuestaron a 72 directivos con poder de decisión sobre la adopción del teletrabajo en sus áreas u organizaciones a cargo, y mediante el modelamiento de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM), se examinó el cambio en el tiempo de los factores que influyen en la decisión de adoptar el teletrabajo y sus consiguientes impactos en sus intenciones; luego, se adaptó el modelo de dinámica de sistemas de difusión de Bass para simular la adopción organizacional e individual del teletrabajo y los impactos resultantes sobre la sostenibilidad ambiental de las mismas, tomando como indicadores el consumo energético y las emisiones de CO2 equivalentes del sector transporte. Los resultados del modelamiento SEM indican que la importancia del teletrabajo para las operaciones y su facilidad de uso determinan significativamente las actitudes de los directivos hacia su adopción. A partir de la información recopilada de 2012 a 2022 para validar el modelo de dinámica de sistemas difusión de Bass que integró estos factores descritos anteriormente, y simuló escenarios para evaluar la adopción a 2032, y se espera que para este año 1.6 millones de colombianos adopten esta modalidad de trabajo. Además, desde el punto de vista de la sostenibilidad, se prevé que la adopción del teletrabajo potencialmente contribuiría en una reducción del 1,55% de la demanda energética asociada al sector transporte de Colombia y a una disminución del 2% de las emisiones de CO2 equivalentes para el sector transporte de Colombia. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto la necesidad de que las empresas adopten el teletrabajo como estrategia para mejorar y contribuir a las metas sostenibilidad en articulación con las políticas públicas. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractTelework brings multiple benefits for employees and for the sustainability of companies, its evaluation and implementation took great relevance during the COVID-19 pandemic, by pushing for mandatory telework, and marking the beginning of a new era in the functioning of companies, but leaving questions about its evaluation and adoption, as a significant number of companies are still reluctant to adopt this mode of operational and work functioning within the same; while others continue under this model after its evaluation, finding numerous advantages. This doctoral thesis evaluated the adoption of telework and its effects on the sustainability of organisations in Medellín, Colombia. To do this, firstly, 72 managers with decision-making power were surveyed about the adoption of telework in their areas or organisations, and through structural equation modelling (SEM), the change over time of the factors influencing the decision to adopt telework and its consequent impacts on their intentions were examined. Subsequently, Bass' system dynamics diffusion model was adapted to simulate organisational and individual adoption of telework and the resulting impacts on their environmental sustainability using energy consumption and CO2 equivalent emissions in the transport sector as indicators. The results of the SEM modelling indicate that the importance of telework to operations and its ease of use significantly determine managers' attitudes towards its adoption. Based on information collected from 2012 to 2022 to validate Bass' system dynamics diffusion model that integrated these factors described above, and simulated scenarios to assess adoption to 2032, 1.6 million of Colombians are expected to adopt this mode of working by 2032. Furthermore, from a sustainability point of view, the adoption of telework is expected to potentially contribute to a 1.55% reduction in energy demand associated with the Colombian transport sector and a 2% reduction in CO2 equivalent emissions for the Colombian transport sector. The results highlight the need for companies to adopt telework as a strategy to improve and contribute to sustainability goals in articulation with public policies.
dc.format.extentxvi, 155 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería
dc.subject.ddc650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia general
dc.titleEvaluación de la adopción del teletrabajo y sus implicaciones en la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones de Medellín
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
dc.contributor.researchgroupModelamiento y Análisis Energía Ambiente Economía
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ingeniería
dc.description.researchareaAnálisis de las Relaciones Energía-Ambiente-Economía
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Minas
dc.publisher.placeMedellín, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relation.indexedRedCol
dc.relation.indexedLaReferencia
dc.relation.referencesAdisa, T. A., Aiyenitaju, O., & Adekoya, O. D. (2021). The work–family balance of British working women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-07-2020-0036
dc.relation.referencesAguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2021). Talent management challenges during COVID-19 and beyond: Performance management to the rescue. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/23409444211009528, 24(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211009528
dc.relation.referencesAhmadi Achachlouei, M., & Hilty, L. M. (2016). Using Systems Thinking and System Dynamics Modeling to Understand Rebound Effects. 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23455-7_13
dc.relation.referencesAinsworth, J. D., Carruthers, E., Couch, P., Green, N., O’Flaherty, M., Sperrin, M., Williams, R., Asghar, Z., Capewell, S., & Buchan, I. E. (2011). IMPACT: A generic tool for modelling and simulating public health policy. Methods of Information in Medicine, 50(5), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME11-02-0006/ID/JR0006-24
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-1816.2002.TB00236.X
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
dc.relation.referencesAllen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1529100615593273, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
dc.relation.referencesAl-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Yusof, F. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2021). The Influence of Information System Success and Technology Acceptance Model on Social Media Factors in Education. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 7770, 13(14), 7770. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13147770
dc.relation.referencesAmini, M., & Bienstock, C. C. (2014). Corporate sustainability: an integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.02.016
dc.relation.referencesAmini, M., & Jahanbakhsh Javid, N. (2023). A Multi-Perspective Framework Established on Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) Theory and Technology, Organization and Environment (TOE) Framework Toward Supply Chain Management System Based on Cloud Computing Technology for Small and Medium Enterprises. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4340207
dc.relation.referencesAndersen, D. L., Luna-Reyes, L. F., Diker, V. G., Black, L., Rich, E., & Andersen, D. F. (2012). The disconfirmatory interview as a strategy for the assessment of system dynamics models. System Dynamics Review, 28(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/SDR.1479
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J. C., Anderson, J. C., Kellogg, J. L., Gerbing, D. W., Brett, J., Fornell, C., Larcker, D., Jr, W. P., & Steiger, J. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 411--423. http://130.203.136.60/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1087.7520
dc.relation.referencesAnsong, E., & Boateng, R. (2018). Organisational adoption of telecommuting: Evidence from a developing country. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(1), e12008. https://doi.org/10.1002/ISD2.12008
dc.relation.referencesArbelaez-Velasquez, C. A., Giraldo, D., & Quintero, S. (2022). Analysis of a Teleworking Technology Adoption Case: An Agent-Based Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16), 9930. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14169930/S1
dc.relation.referencesAristovnik, A., Murko, E., & Ravšelj, D. (2022). From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government. Administrative Sciences 2022, Vol. 12, Page 26, 12(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ADMSCI12010026
dc.relation.referencesAthanasiadou, C., & Theriou, G. (2021). Telework: systematic literature review and future research agenda. Heliyon, 7(10), e08165. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E08165
dc.relation.referencesAxelrod, R. (2006). Chapter 33 Agent-based Modeling as a Bridge Between Disciplines. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2, 1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02033-2
dc.relation.referencesAzar, A. T. (2012). System dynamics as a useful technique for complex systems. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 10(4), 377–410. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2012.046298
dc.relation.referencesBagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (2009). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/10705519409539961, 1(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519409539961
dc.relation.referencesBailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.144
dc.relation.referencesBaker, S., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. (2020). Macroeconomic Policy in the Time of COVID-19: A Primer for Developing Countries. https://doi.org/10.3386/W21633
dc.relation.referencesBaker, S., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. (2020). Macroeconomic Policy in the Time of COVID-19: A Primer for Developing Countries. https://doi.org/10.3386/W21633
dc.relation.referencesBarlas, Y. (1989). Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research, 42(1), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(89)90059-3
dc.relation.referencesBass, F. M. (2004). “A New Product Growth f or Model Consumer Durables” The Bass Model. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 50(12), 1833–1840. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0300
dc.relation.referencesBass, F. M., Krishnan, T. V., & Jain, D. C. (1994). Why the Bass Model Fits without Decision Variables. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Mksc.13.3.203, 13(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/MKSC.13.3.203
dc.relation.referencesBeauregard, T. A., Basile, K. A., & Canonico, E. (2019). Telework: Outcomes and facilitators for employees. The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior, 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649636.020
dc.relation.referencesBeham, B., Baierl, A., & Poelmans, S. (2014). Managerial telework allowance decisions – a vignette study among German managers. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/09585192.2014.934894, 26(11), 1385–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.934894
dc.relation.referencesBelostecinic, G., Mogoș, R. I., Popescu, M. L., Burlacu, S., Rădulescu, C. V., Bodislav, D. A., Bran, F., & Oancea-Negescu, M. D. (2021). Teleworking—An Economic and Social Impact during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Data Mining Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, Vol. 19, Page 298, 19(1), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19010298
dc.relation.referencesBelzunegui-Eraso, A., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Teleworking in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 3662, 12(9), 3662. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12093662
dc.relation.referencesBhattacherjee, A., Davis, C. J., Connolly, A. J., & Hikmet, N. (2017). User response to mandatory IT use: a coping theory perspective. Https://Doi.Org/10.1057/S41303-017-0047-0, 27(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41303-017-0047-0
dc.relation.referencesBhui, K. S., Dinos, S., Stansfeld, S. A., & White, P. D. (2012). A Synthesis of the Evidence for Managing Stress at Work: A Review of the Reviews Reporting on Anxiety, Depression, and Absenteeism. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/515874
dc.relation.referencesBonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl_3), 7280–7287. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.082080899
dc.relation.referencesBontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142/FULL/XML
dc.relation.referencesBorsatto, J. M. L. S., & Bazani, C. L. (2021). Green innovation and environmental regulations: a systematic review of international academic works. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 63751–63768. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-11379-7/TABLES/3
dc.relation.referencesBourhis, A., & Mekkaoui, R. (2010). Beyond Work-Family Balance: Are Family-Friendly Organizations More Attractive? Relations Industrielles, 65(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.7202/039529AR
dc.relation.referencesCaraiani, C., Lungu, C. I., Dascalu, C., & Stoian, C. A. (2022). The impact of telework on organisational performance, behaviour, and culture: evidence from business services industry based on employees’ perceptions. Http://Www.Tandfonline.Com/Action/AuthorSubmission?JournalCode=rero20&page=instructions. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2142815
dc.relation.referencesCarillo, K., Cachat-Rosset, G., Marsan, J., Saba, T., & Klarsfeld, A. (2020). Adjusting to epidemic-induced telework: empirical insights from teleworkers in France. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1829512, 30(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1829512
dc.relation.referencesCarr, J. C., & Sequeira, J. M. (2007). Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A Theory of Planned Behavior approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2006.12.016
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, M., Hagerman, A. D., & Whitacre, B. (2022). Telework and COVID-19 Resiliency in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 52(1), 19–34.
dc.relation.referencesCavana, R. Y. (2003). Modeling the environment: an introduction to system dynamics models of environmental systems. Andrew Ford Island Press, Washington DC, 1999, viii + 401 pp. ISBN: 1-55963-601-7. System Dynamics Review, 19(2), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/SDR.272
dc.relation.referencesCharalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2018). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886, 28(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
dc.relation.referencesChênevert, D., Fournier, P.-L., Menvielle, L., Bruneau, J., Jutras-Aswad, D., & Bissonnette, A. (2022). Lockdowns and Telework: Psychological and Work-Related Consequences. Relations Industrielles, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.7202/1088552AR
dc.relation.referencesChoo, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2005). Does telecommuting reduce vehicle-miles traveled? An aggregate time series analysis for the U.S. Transportation, 32(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11116-004-3046-7/METRICS
dc.relation.referencesClauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12186
dc.relation.referencesCompeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Isre.6.2.118, 6(2), 118–143. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.6.2.118
dc.relation.referencesConfecámaras. (2013). Impacto de la Formalización Empresarial en Colombia. Impacto de La Formalización Empresarial En Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. (2008, June 16). LEY 1221 DE 2008-Por la cual se establecen normas para promover y regular el Teletrabajo y se dictan otras disposiciones.
dc.relation.referencesDamanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers1. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8551.2006.00498.X
dc.relation.referencesDamanpour, F., Szabat, K. A., & Evan, W. M. (1989). The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6486.1989.TB00746.X
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2022). Encuesta Pulso Social. Https://Www.Dane.Gov.Co/Index.Php/Estadisticas-Por-Tema/Encuesta-Pulso-Social. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/encuesta-pulso-social
dc.relation.referencesDaniels, K., Lamond, D., & Standen, P. (2001). Teleworking: Frameworks for Organizational Research. Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1151–1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00276
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F. D. (2014). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/35465050
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1287/Mnsc.35.8.982, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.35.8.982
dc.relation.referencesDe Marco, M., Marcone, F., & Scarozza, D. (2022). Smart Working in Public Administration: Anti Pandemic Tool or Work Organization Model? Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 53, 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94252-6_21/COVER
dc.relation.referencesdel Río González, P. (2009). The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2008.07.004
dc.relation.referencesDeterminants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model on JSTOR. (n.d.). Retrieved September 30, 2022, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011042
dc.relation.referencesDhirasasna, N. N., & Sahin, O. (2021). A system dynamics model for renewable energy technology adoption of the hotel sector. Renewable Energy, 163, 1994–2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2020.10.088
dc.relation.referencesDias, P., Lopes, S., & Peixoto, R. (2022). Mastering new technologies: does it relate to teleworkers’ (in)voluntariness and well-being? Journal of Knowledge Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0003/FULL/XML
dc.relation.referencesDimitrova, D. (2003). Controlling teleworkers: supervision and flexibility revisited. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00120
dc.relation.referencesDonthu, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117, 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.06.008
dc.relation.referencesEckert, E., & Kovalevska, O. (2021). Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the Discourse of the European Green Deal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 2021, Vol. 14, Page 80, 14(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/JRFM14020080
dc.relation.referencesEgbuta, I. C., Thomas, B., & Al-Hasan, S. (2001). Teleworking and a Green Computing Environment: A Conceptual Model. Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/IJICTHD.2017010104, 9(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTHD.2017010104
dc.relation.referencesFan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (2009). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10705519909540119, 6(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540119
dc.relation.referencesFishman, G. S., & Kiviat, P. J. (1967). The Analysis of Simulation-Generated Time Series. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Mnsc.13.7.525, 13(7), 525–557. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.13.7.525
dc.relation.referencesFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
dc.relation.referencesForrester, J. W. (1993). System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years. A Systems-Based Approach to Policymaking, 199–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3226-2_7
dc.relation.referencesForrester, J. W. (2017). Industrial Dynamics. Https://Doi.Org/10.1057/Palgrave.Jors.2600946, 48(10), 1037–1041. https://doi.org/10.1057/PALGRAVE.JORS.2600946
dc.relation.referencesGajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown About Telecommuting: Meta-Analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
dc.relation.referencesGallivan, M. J. (2001). Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 51–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506729
dc.relation.referencesGálvez, A., Tirado, F., & Martínez, M. J. (2020). Work–Life Balance, Organizations and Social Sustainability: Analyzing Female Telework in Spain. Sustainability, 12(9), 1–21. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3567-d351215.html
dc.relation.referencesGhaleb, E. A. A., Dominic, P. D. D., Fati, S. M., Muneer, A., & Ali, R. F. (2021). The Assessment of Big Data Adoption Readiness with a Technology–Organization–Environment Framework: A Perspective towards Healthcare Employees. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 8379, 13(15), 8379. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13158379
dc.relation.referencesGolden, T. D. (2012). Applying technology to work: toward a better understanding of telework. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1057/Omj.2009.33, 6(4), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1057/OMJ.2009.33
dc.relation.referencesGolden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The Impact of Professional Isolation on Teleworker Job Performance and Turnover Intentions: Does Time Spent Teleworking, Interacting Face-to-Face, or Having Access to Communication-Enhancing Technology Matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0012722
dc.relation.referencesGómez V., J. J., & Jochem, P. (2019). Simulating vehicle fleet composition: A review of system dynamics models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 115, 109367. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2019.109367
dc.relation.referencesGoodhue, D. L., Klein, B. D., & March, S. T. (2000). User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Information & Management, 38(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00057-4
dc.relation.referencesGoodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 19(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
dc.relation.referencesGreenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0887-378X.2004.00325.X
dc.relation.referencesGruenhagen, J. H., & Parker, R. (2020). Factors driving or impeding the diffusion and adoption of innovation in mining: A systematic review of the literature. Resources Policy, 65, 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2019.101540
dc.relation.referencesHaddon, L., & Brynin, M. (2005). The character of telework and the characteristics of teleworkers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-005X.2005.00142.X
dc.relation.referencesHage, J. (2018). Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. 345–372. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429449482-17
dc.relation.referencesHaider, M., & Anwar, A. I. (2023). The prevalence of telework under Covid-19 in Canada. Information Technology and People, 36(1), 196–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2021-0585/FULL/XML
dc.relation.referencesHale, J. L., Householder, B. J., & Greene, K. L. (2002). The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice - James Price Dillard, Michael Pfau - Google Books (Vol. 14).
dc.relation.referencesHassan, A. M., & Lee, H. (2015). Toward the sustainable development of urban areas: An overview of global trends in trials and policies. Land Use Policy, 48, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2015.04.029
dc.relation.referencesHeijkoop, G., & Cunningham, S. (2007). Using System Dynamics for Modeling Benefit Realization in the Adoption of New Business Software.
dc.relation.referencesHenry, M. S., le Roux, D. B., & Parry, D. A. (2021). Working in a post Covid-19 world: Towards a conceptual framework for distributed work. South African Journal of Business Management, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJBM.V52I1.2155
dc.relation.referencesHook, A., Court, V., Sovacool, B. K., & Sorrell, S. (2020). A systematic review of the energy and climate impacts of teleworking. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), 093003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/AB8A84
dc.relation.referencesHooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Evaluating Model Fit:a Synthesis of the Structural Equation Modelling Literature. Conference Papers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73
dc.relation.referencesHorvat, A., Fogliano, V., & Luning, P. A. (2020). Modifying the Bass diffusion model to study adoption of radical new foods–The case of edible insects in the Netherlands. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0234538. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0234538
dc.relation.referencesIllegems, V., & Verbeke, A. (2004). Telework: What Does it Mean for Management? Long Range Planning, 37(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LRP.2004.03.004
dc.relation.referencesIveroth, E., & Bengtsson, F. (2014). Changing behavior towards sustainable practices using Information Technology. Journal of Environmental Management, 139, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2013.11.054
dc.relation.referencesKaluza, A. J., & van Dick, R. (2022). Telework at times of a pandemic: The role of voluntariness in the perception of disadvantages of telework. Current Psychology, 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-022-03047-5/FIGURES/3
dc.relation.referencesKazekami, S. (2020). Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2019.101868
dc.relation.referencesKitou, E., & Horvath, A. (2003). Energy-related emissions from telework. Environmental Science and Technology, 37(16), 3467–3475. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES025849P/SUPPL_FILE/ES025849PSI20020606_015814.PDF
dc.relation.referencesKwon, T. H., & Zmud, R. W. (1987). Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, 227–251. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=54905.54915
dc.relation.referencesLai, C. P. (2019). Personality Traits and Stock Investment of Individuals. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 5474, 11(19), 5474. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11195474
dc.relation.referencesLanzolla, G., Pesce, D., & Tucci, C. L. (2021). The Digital Transformation of Search and Recombination in the Innovation Function: Tensions and an Integrative Framework*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/JPIM.12546
dc.relation.referencesLaumer, S., & Maier, C. (2021). Why do People (not) Want to Work from Home? An Individual-focused Literature Review on Telework. SIGMIS-CPR 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 Computers and People Research Conference, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458026.3462155
dc.relation.referencesLebopo, C. M., Seymour, L. F., & Knoesen, H. (2020). Explaining factors affecting telework adoption in South African organisations pre-COVID-19. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410886.3410906
dc.relation.referencesLee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 61(1), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.10.001
dc.relation.referencesLee, J., Lee, H., & Suh, A. (2009). Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Information Technology and Crafting of Job: Shaping Future of Work? Retrieved February 19, 2023, from https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/275
dc.relation.referencesLeonard, D. A. (2011). Managing knowledge assets, creativity and innovation. Managing Knowledge Assets, Creativity and Innovation, 1–571. https://doi.org/10.1142/7638
dc.relation.referencesLimayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 31(4), 705–737. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817
dc.relation.referencesLucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616
dc.relation.referencesMahler, J. (2012). The Telework Divide. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0734371X12458127, 32(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X12458127
dc.relation.referencesMalhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772658
dc.relation.referencesMalik, S., Chadhar, M., Vatanasakdakul, S., & Chetty, M. (2021). Factors Affecting the Organizational Adoption of Blockchain Technology: Extending the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) Framework in the Australian Context. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 9404, 13(16), 9404. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13169404
dc.relation.referencesMallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2018). Assessing Indirect Environmental Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT): A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2018, Vol. 10, Page 2662, 10(8), 2662. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10082662
dc.relation.referencesManstead, A. S. R., & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000012
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, J., J. E., Arango, A., S., Álvarez, U., K. C., & Jaramillo, A., P. (2017). Assessing the impacts of transport policies through energy system simulation: The case of the Medellin Metropolitan Area, Colombia. Energy Policy, 101, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2016.11.026
dc.relation.referencesMartinez, M., I. J., & Richardson, G. P. (2013). Best practices in system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 29(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/SDR.1495
dc.relation.referencesMartins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2013.06.002
dc.relation.referencesMayo, M., Pastor, J. C., Gomez, Mejia, L., & Cruz, C. (2009). Why some firms adopt telecommuting while others do not: A contingency perspective. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/HRM.20322
dc.relation.referencesMcMaster, M., Nettleton, C., Tom, C., Xu, B., Cao, C., & Qiao, P. (2020). Risk Management: Rethinking Fashion Supply Chain Management for Multinational Corporations in Light of the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 2020, Vol. 13, Page 173, 13(8), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/JRFM13080173
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación. (2018). Estudio de penetración del Teletrabajo en empresas-Colombia. Https://Www.Teletrabajo.Gov.Co/622/W3-Article-75985.Html. https://www.teletrabajo.gov.co/622/w3-article-75985.html
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (MinTIC). (2020). Penetración de Teletrabajo en Colombia –Quinta medición. Mintic. https://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/715/articles-179742_recurso_1.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio del Trabajo. (2012). Línea de Base del Teletrabajo en Colombia . Https://Www.Teletrabajo.Gov.Co/622/Articles-8145_archivo_pdf_diagnostico_2012.Pdf.
dc.relation.referencesMinTIC. (2020). QUINTO ESTUDIO DE PERCEPCIÓN Y PENETRACIÓN EN EMPRESAS COLOMBIANAS 2020. QUINTO ESTUDIO DE PERCEPCIÓN Y PENETRACIÓN EN EMPRESAS COLOMBIANAS 2020.
dc.relation.referencesMinTIC. (2021, December 30). Penetración y percepción del teletrabajo. MinTIC. https://www.teletrabajo.gov.co/622/articles-209505_recurso_1.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMoglia, M., Hopkins, J., & Bardoel, A. (2021). Telework, Hybrid Work and the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Policy Coherence. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 9222, 13(16), 9222. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13169222
dc.relation.referencesMohammadi, M., Rahimi, E., Davatgari, A., Javadinasr, M., Mohammadian, A., Bhagat-Conway, M. W., Salon, D., Derrible, S., Pendyala, R. M., & Khoeini, S. (2022). Examining the persistence of telecommuting after the COVID-19 pandemic. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2077582. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2077582
dc.relation.referencesMokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (1994). Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting: Setting the Context. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1068/A260749, 26(5), 749–766. https://doi.org/10.1068/A260749
dc.relation.referencesMontoya, R., L. A., & Montoya, R., I. (2022). La restauración organizacional, estrategia emergente como metáfora para la adaptación de los ecosistemas empresariales. Criterio Libre, 20(36), e459084–e459084. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/CRITERIOLIBRE.2022V20N36.9084
dc.relation.referencesMoore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Isre.2.3.192, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.2.3.192
dc.relation.referencesMoore, G. C., Benbasat, I., Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.2.3.192
dc.relation.referencesMorlán, S. C., I., Davalillo, A., A., & Dolado, C., J. J. (2010). Modelo de dinámica de sistemas para la implantación de tecnologías de la información en la gestión estratégica universitaria. http://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/12277
dc.relation.referencesMüller, T., & Niessen, C. (2019). Self-leadership in the context of part-time teleworking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.2371
dc.relation.referencesMustonen, O., E. (2014). Methodologies Choice and Adoption: Using Diffusion of Innovations as the Theoretical Framework. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228997645
dc.relation.referencesNeufeld, D. J., & Fang, Y. (2005). Individual, social and situational determinants of telecommuter productivity. Information & Management, 42(7), 1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2004.12.001
dc.relation.referencesNunnally, J. C. (1978). An Overview of Psychological Measurement. Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders, 97–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
dc.relation.referencesO’Brien, W., & Yazdani, A., F. (2020). Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods. Energy and Buildings, 225, 110298. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2020.110298
dc.relation.referencesOng, T. F., & Musa, G. (2011). An examination of recreational divers’ underwater behaviour by attitude–behaviour theories. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/13683500.2010.545370, 14(8), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2010.545370
dc.relation.referencesPalliya, N., Sasika, G., & Naotunna, I. (2018). Autonomy and Creativity of Professional Teleworkers: The Mediating Role of Creative Self Efficacy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324080932
dc.relation.referencesPan, M.-J., & Jang, W.-Y. (2016). Taiwan’s Communications Industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2008.11646025
dc.relation.referencesPark, S., & Cho, Y. J. (2020). Does telework status affect the behavior and perception of supervisors? Examining task behavior and perception in the telework context. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1777183, 33(7), 1326–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1777183
dc.relation.referencesParker, L. D. (2020). The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(8), 1943–1967. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609/FULL/XML
dc.relation.referencesParra, J. F., Jaramillo, P., & Arango, A., S. (2018). Metaheuristic optimization methods for calibration of system dynamics models. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/17477778.2018.1467850, 12(2), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2018.1467850
dc.relation.referencesPerez, P., M., Martinez, S., A., & De Luis Carnicer, M. P. (2010). Top Manager and Institutional Effects on the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of Teleworking 1. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/0810902032000051018, 21(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0810902032000051018
dc.relation.referencesPérez, P., M., Martínez, S., A., de Luis Carnicer, P., & José Vela Jiménez, M. (2004). A technology acceptance model of innovation adoption: The case of teleworking. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565038/FULL/XML
dc.relation.referencesPicoto, W. N., Bélanger, F., & Palma-Dos-Reis, A. (2014). A technology-organisation-environment (TOE)-based m-business value instrument. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 12(1), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2014.059240
dc.relation.referencesPintelas, E., Livieris, I. E., & Pintelas, P. (2020). A Grey-Box Ensemble Model Exploiting Black-Box Accuracy and White-Box Intrinsic Interpretability. Algorithms 2020, Vol. 13, Page 17, 13(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/A13010017
dc.relation.referencesPorter, L., Rickards, L., Verlie, B., Moloney, S., Lay, B., Latham, B., Anguelovski, I., Pellow, D., Porter, L., Bosomworth, K., Rickards, L., Verlie, B., Moloney, S., Lay, B., Latham, B., BCNUEJ, I. A., Pellow, D. N., Naarm/Birrarung-ga, Porter, L., … Lay, B. (2020). Climate Justice in a Climate Changed World. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1748959, 21(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1748959
dc.relation.referencesQudrat, U., H., & Seong, B. S. (2010). How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2216–2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2009.12.009
dc.relation.referencesRachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2019). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1143–1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020/FULL/PDF
dc.relation.referencesRaghuram, S., & Fang, D. (2014). Telecommuting and the role of supervisory power in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10490-013-9360-X/FIGURES/1
dc.relation.referencesRaghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019). Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Annals.2017.0020, 13(1), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.5465/ANNALS.2017.0020
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1496176
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1496176
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. The Free Press, 866 Third Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10022.
dc.relation.referencesRoth, K. W., Rhodes, T., & Ponoum, R. (2008). The energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of telecommuting in the U.S. IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2008.4562945
dc.relation.referencesRoth, K. W., Rhodes, T., & Ponoum, R. (2008). The energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of telecommuting in the U.S. IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2008.4562945
dc.relation.referencesRuppel, C., & Howard, G. S. (1998). The Effects of Environmental Factors on the Adoption and Diffusion of Telework. Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/Joeuc.1998100101, 10(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.1998100101
dc.relation.referencesRuppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (1995). Telework. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 26(2–3), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/217278.217288
dc.relation.referencesRuppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (1995). Telework: an innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon? ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 26(2–3), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/217278.217288
dc.relation.referencesRuth, S., & Chaudhry, I. (2008). Telework: A productivity paradox? IEEE Internet Computing, 12(6), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2008.132
dc.relation.referencesSalgado y Burruezo, A. (2022). Teletreball, gènere i corresponsabilitat: anàlisi i projecte en l’àmbit de l’administració de la Generalitat de Catalunya. http://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/53967
dc.relation.referencesScott, J. (2022). Phishing ecosystem : A Qualitative Analysis of Phishing Susceptibility in Employees Who Work from Home. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-22262
dc.relation.referencesShamsi, M., Iakovleva, T., Olsen, E., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2021). Employees’ Work-Related Well-Being during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model and JD-R Theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, Vol. 18, Page 11888, 18(22), 11888. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH182211888
dc.relation.referencesShayan, N. F., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 1222, 14(3), 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14031222
dc.relation.referencesShin, B. (2003). Telework Effectiveness: Task, Technology and Communication Fit Perspective. Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/978-1-93177-745-2.Ch001, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-93177-745-2.CH001
dc.relation.referencesShin, B., Liu Sheng, O. R., & Higa, K. (2009). Telework: Existing Research and Future Directions. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1002_2, 10(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1002_2
dc.relation.referencesSilva C, A., Montoya R, I. A., & Valencia A, J. A. (2019). The attitude of managers toward telework, why is it so difficult to adopt it in organizations? Technology in Society, 59, 101133. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2019.04.009
dc.relation.referencesSivakumar, V., Higa, K., Yen, J., & Bui, T. X. (1996). Telework : a diffusion of administrative innovations. Proceedings of the First Asia-Pacific Decision Sciences Institute Conference, Hong Kong,, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.2/VALIDATOR.MIN.JS
dc.relation.referencesSpencer, A. J., Buhalis, D., & Moital, M. (2012). A hierarchical model of technology adoption for small owner-managed travel firms: An organizational decision-making and leadership perspective. Tourism Management, 33(5), 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOURMAN.2011.11.011
dc.relation.referencesStacks, D. W., & Salwen, M. Brian. (2014). Diffusion of Innovations. 432–448. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887011-36
dc.relation.referencesSterman, J. D. (2002). System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/102741
dc.relation.referencesSwinerd, C., & McNaught, K. R. (2017). Simulating the diffusion of technological innovation with an integrated hybrid agent-based system dynamics model. Https://Doi.Org/10.1057/Jos.2014.2, 8(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1057/JOS.2014.2
dc.relation.referencesTabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics Title: Using multivariate statistics. https://lccn.loc.gov/2017040173
dc.relation.referencesTaber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-016-9602-2/TABLES/1
dc.relation.referencesTanimoto, K. (2013). Sustainability and Sustainable Development. Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2370–2378. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_662
dc.relation.referencesTarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/ISJ.12042
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00895-5
dc.relation.referencesTerazumi, W., Murata, H., & Kobayashi, H. (2022). System dynamics model for changing transportation demand during the pandemic in Japan. Procedia CIRP, 105, 805–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2022.02.133
dc.relation.referencesTornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, Mitchell., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). processes of technological innovation. The Processes of Technological Innovation, 298. https://doi.org/10.3/JQUERY-UI.JS
dc.relation.referencesTremblay, D. G. (2002). Balancing work and family with telework? Organizational issues and challenges for women and managers. Women in Management Review, 17(3/4), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420210425309/FULL/XML
dc.relation.referencesTurk, T., & Trkman, P. (2012). Bass model estimates for broadband diffusion in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2011.06.010
dc.relation.referencesUllman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.HOP202023
dc.relation.referencesUPME. (2019). PLAN ENERGÉTICO NACIONAL 2020- 2050.
dc.relation.referencesUrbaniec, M., Małkowska, A., & Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H. (2022). The Impact of Technological Developments on Remote Working: Insights from the Polish Managers’ Perspective. Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 552, 14(1), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14010552
dc.relation.referencesUtterback, J. M., & Afuah, A. N. (2006). The Dynamic ‘Diamond’: A Technological Innovation Perspective. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/10438599800000019, 6(2–3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000019
dc.relation.referencesVan Steenbergen, E. F., Van Der Ven, C., Peeters, M. C. W., Taris, T. W., & Steenbergen, E. F. Van. (2022). Telework and Worker Health and Well-Being: A Review and Recommendations for Research and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, Vol. 19, Page 3879, 19(7), 3879. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19073879
dc.relation.referencesVendramin, N., Nardelli, G., & Ipsen, C. (2021). Task-Technology Fit Theory: An Approach For Mitigating Technostress. A Handbook of Theories on Designing Alignment Between People and the Office Environment, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-4/TASK-TECHNOLOGY-FIT-THEORY-NELDA-VENDRAMIN-GIULIA-NARDELLI-CHRISTINE-IPSEN
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-5915.2008.00192.X
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–205. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&issn=00251909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA62347235&sid=googleScholar&linkaccess=fulltext
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., & Speier, C. (2000). Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(6), 991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1006/IJHC.1999.0367
dc.relation.referencesWang, W.-T., & Liu, C.-Y. (2005). The Application of the Technology Acceptance Model: A New Way to Evaluate Information System Success.
dc.relation.referencesWilson, M., & Greenhill, A. (2004). Gender and teleworking identities in the risk society: a research agenda. New Technology, Work and Employment, 19(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-005X.2004.00138.X
dc.relation.referencesWood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.1989.4279067, 14(3), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4279067
dc.relation.referencesYen, J., Sivakumar, V., Higa, K., Bui, T. X., Yen, J. ;, Sivakumar, V. ;, Higa, K. ;, & Higaand, K. (1996). Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) A Model for Diffusion of Telework Recommended Citation A Model for Diffusion of Telework. AMCIS. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis1996/32
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembTrabajo en casa
dc.subject.lembHome labor
dc.subject.lembTelecommuting
dc.subject.lembTeleconmutación
dc.subject.proposalAdopción organizacional del teletrabajo
dc.subject.proposalImpactos en la sostenibilidad ambiental
dc.subject.proposalDinámica de sistemas
dc.subject.proposalModelamiento de ecuaciones estructurales
dc.subject.proposalOrganisational adoption of telework
dc.subject.proposalImpacts on environmental sustainability
dc.subject.proposalSystem dynamics
dc.subject.proposalStructural equation modelling
dc.title.translatedEvaluation of telework adoption and its implications in the sustainability of organizations in Medellin
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dc.description.curricularareaÁrea Curricular de Ingeniería Administrativa e Ingeniería Industrial
dc.contributor.orcidMontoya Restrepo, Iván Alonso [0000-0003-0959-3466]
dc.contributor.orcidSilva Cortés, Alejandro [0000-0002-2910-1417]


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
1026139667.2023.pdf
Tamaño:
2.530Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería ...
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito