Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorOrrego Suaza, Sergio Alonso
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Álvarez, Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T16:03:13Z
dc.date.available2024-01-30T16:03:13Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85520
dc.description.abstractEste estudio utiliza un experimento de elección, basado en la teoría de la utilidad, para investigar las preferencias individuales relacionadas con el riesgo de mortalidad asociado con la exposición a la contaminación atmosférica. Precio, duración y costo se utilizan como atributos para analizar las preferencias individuales. A través de una encuesta representativa, se recopilaron directamente datos sociodemográficos y psicométricos de los encuestados. La inclusión de variables psicológicas en un modelo de clases latentes permitió capturar información individual no observable. Los resultados indican que un modelo híbrido mejora significativamente las estimaciones en comparación con un modelo que no incluye clases latentes diferenciadas por perfiles psicológicos. La primera clase (71% de la población) tiende a preferir escenarios donde las políticas públicas mitiguen el riesgo de mortalidad por contaminación atmosférica, mientras que la segunda clase (29% de la población) tiende a no preferir la intervención estatal. La probabilidad de participar en programas de políticas públicas destinados a reducir el riesgo de mortalidad por contaminación atmosférica aumenta con la estabilidad laboral, los niveles más altos de miedo y la percepción de evitabilidad (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractA choice experiment, based on utility theory, was used to study individual preferences of associated with the risk of mortality because of exposition to air pollution. Price, duration, and cost were the attributes used to examine the individual preferences. Sociodemographic and psychometric information was directly elicited from the respondents by using a representative survey. The inclusion of psychological variables in a latent class model allows to capture unobservable individual information. The results suggest that a hybrid model substantially improves the estimates of a model in which two latent classes were included and differentiated based on two psychological profiles. The first class (71% of the population) is more likely to prefer scenarios where the application of public policies reduces the risk of mortality due to air pollution, compared to a second class (29% of the population) that is more likely not to prefer state intervention. The probability of being part of a public policy program aimed at reducing the risk of death due to air pollution increases by having job stability, higher levels of fear and perception of avoidability.
dc.format.extent49 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía
dc.subject.ddc360 - Problemas y servicios sociales; asociaciones::363 - Otros problemas y servicios sociales
dc.titleUso de experimentos de elección y modelos híbridos para estudiar la valoración económica del riesgo de mortalidad por COVID-19 y contaminación atmosférica en Colombia
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Ciencias Humanas y Económicas - Maestría en Ciencias Económicas
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ciencias Económicas
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanas y Económicas
dc.publisher.placeMedellín, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relation.indexedLaReferencia
dc.relation.referencesAbou-Zeid, M., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2014). Hybrid choice models. Chapters, 17(2), 383–412. https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/14820_17.html
dc.relation.referencesAlmaguer, C. D. (2008). El riesgo: una reflexión filosófica. Universidad de La Habana, 1, 1–159. https://temas.sld.cu/saludydesastres/2010/11/03/el-riesgo-de-desastres-una-reflexion/
dc.relation.referencesAmoatey, Sicard P. A., D. M., & Y.O, K. (2019). Long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 and impacts on health in Roma. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2020;8(2):531–535. Doi: 10.1016/j.Cegh.2019.11.009, 8(2), 531–535.
dc.relation.referencesAshenfelter, O. C. (2011). Measuring the Value of a Statistical Life: Problems and Prospects. SSRN Electronic Journal, 16(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.877890
dc.relation.referencesAshok, K., Dillon, W. R., & Yuan, S. (2002). Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.31.18937
dc.relation.referencesBarrientos, M. A. C. (2019). Incorporación de variables latentes en la estimación del valor estadístico de la vida. 1(1), 64. http://repositorio.udec.cl/jspui/handle/11594/5867
dc.relation.referencesBhat, C. R., & Dubey, S. K. (2014). A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.011
dc.relation.referencesBolduc, D., Boucher, N., & Alvarez-Daziano, R. (2008). Hybrid choice modeling of new technologies for car choice in Canada. Transportation Research Record, 2(2082), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.3141/2082-08
dc.relation.referencesBrody, S. D., Peck, B. M., & Highfield, W. E. (2004). Examining localized patterns of air quality perception in Texas: a spatial and statistical analysis. Risk Analysis : An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 24(6), 1561–1574. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0272-4332.2004.00550.X
dc.relation.referencesCameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics. In Microeconometrics. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811241
dc.relation.referencesChen, G., & Tsurumi, H. (2011). Probit and logit model selection. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920903377799
dc.relation.referencesCoccia, M. (2020). An index to quantify environmental risk of exposure to future epidemics of the COVID-19 and similar viral agents: Theory and practice. Environmental Research, 29(4), 110–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110155
dc.relation.referencesCollins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. In Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470567333
dc.relation.referencesCori, L., Donzelli, G., Gorini, F., Bianchi, F., & Curzio, O. (2020). Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH17176424
dc.relation.referencesDaly, A., Hess, S., Patruni, B., Potoglou, D., & Rohr, C. (2012). Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: A study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour. Transportation, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9351-z
dc.relation.referencesDiffenbaugh, N. S., Field, C. B., Appel, E. A., Azevedo, I. L., Baldocchi, D. D., Burke, M., Burney, J. A., Ciais, P., Davis, S. J., Fiore, A. M., Fletcher, S. M., Hertel, T. W., Horton, D. E., Hsiang, S. M., Jackson, R. B., Jin, X., Levi, M., Lobell, D. B., McKinley, G. A., … Wong-Parodi, G. (2020). The COVID-19 lockdowns: a window into the Earth System. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(2), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0079-1
dc.relation.referencesDrottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. (1991). Perception of risk: Studies of risk attitudes, perceptions and definitions. Risk Analysis, 11(4), 123–144. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227446971_Perceived_Risk_Attitudes_Relating_Risk_Perception_to_Risky_Choice
dc.relation.referencesEslami, H., & Jalili, M. (2020). The role of environmental factors to transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). AMB Express, 10(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01028-0
dc.relation.referencesFabiani, J.-L., & Theys, J. (1987). La Société vulnérable - Evaluer et maîtriser les risques. Presses de l’École Normale Supérieure, 1(1), 678. https://ulysse.univ-lorraine.fr/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001404709705596&context=L&vid=33UDL_INST:UDL&adaptor=Local Search Engine&tab=Everything&mode=advanced
dc.relation.referencesFischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
dc.relation.referencesGany, F., Bari, S., Prasad, L., Leng, J., Lee, T., Thurston, G. D., Gordon, T., Acharya, S., & Zelikoff, J. T. (2017). Perception and reality of particulate matter exposure in New York City taxi drivers. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 27(2), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/JES.2016.23
dc.relation.referencesGigerenzer, G. (2015). Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions - Gerd Gigerenzer (2015) - BehavioralEconomics.com | The BE Hub (Viking Penguin, Vol. 1). Penguin Group. https://www.behavioraleconomics.com/resources/books/risk-savvy-how-to-make-good-decisions-gerd-gigerenzer-2015/
dc.relation.referencesGrima, S., Hamarat, B., Özen, E., Girlando, A., & Dalli-Gonzi, R. (2021). The Relationship between Risk Perception and Risk Definition and Risk-Addressing Behaviour during the Early COVID-19 Stages. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14060272
dc.relation.referencesHensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. In Cambridge University Press (Ed.), Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610356
dc.relation.referencesHess, S., & Palma, D. (2019). Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application. Journal of Choice Modelling, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170
dc.relation.referencesHuang, L., Rao, C., van der Kuijp, T. J., Bi, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). A comparison of individual exposure, perception, and acceptable levels of PM 2.5 with air pollution policy objectives in China. Environmental Research, 157, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2017.05.012
dc.relation.referencesINS. (2018). Carga de enfermedad ambiental en Colombia. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública de Colombia, 10(1), 96. https://www.ins.gov.co/Direcciones/ONS/Informes/10 Carga de enfermedad ambiental en Colombia.pdf
dc.relation.referencesINS. (2022). COVID-19 en Colombia. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública de Colombia, 1(1), 2. https://www.ins.gov.co/Noticias/paginas/coronavirus.aspx
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, B. B., Swedlow, B., & Mayorga, M. W. (2019). Cultural theory and cultural cognition theory survey measures: confirmatory factoring and predictive validity of factor scores for judged risk. Journal of Risk Research, 23(11), 1467–1490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1687577
dc.relation.referencesKrupnick, A., Alberini, A., Cropper, M., Simon, N., O’Brien, B., Goeree, R., & Heintzelman, M. (2002). Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24(4), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014020027011
dc.relation.referencesKucharski, T.W., R., C., D., Y., L., J., E., S., F., & R.M., E. (2020). On behalf of the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 working group 2020. Early Dynamics of Transmission and Control of COVID-19: A Mathematical Modelling Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020 Doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4., 2(5), 553–558. https://www.thelancet.com/article/S1473-3099(20)30144-4/fulltext
dc.relation.referencesLanza, S. T., & Rhoades, B. L. (2013). Latent Class Analysis: An Alternative Perspective on Subgroup Analysis in Prevention and Treatment. Prevention Science, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0201-1
dc.relation.referencesLawless, R., Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Environmental Review: ER, 7(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.2307/3984511
dc.relation.referencesLi, F., & Zhou, T. (2020). Effects of objective and subjective environmental pollution on well-being in urban China: A structural equation model approach. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2020.112859
dc.relation.referencesLi, X., Song, Y., Wong, G., & Cui, J. (2020). Bat origin of a new human coronavirus: there and back again. Science China Life Sciences, 63(3), 461–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1645-7
dc.relation.referencesMalmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2011). Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 373–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq004
dc.relation.referencesManski, C. F. (1977). The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision, 8(3), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133443
dc.relation.referencesMariel, P., Hoyos, D., Meyerhoff, J., Czajkowski, M., Dekker, T., Glenk, K., Jacobsen, J. B., Liebe, U., Olsen, S. B., Sagebiel, J., & Thiene, M. (2021). Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments. Springer Nature, 62–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3)
dc.relation.referencesMartelletti, L., & Martelletti, P. (2020). Air Pollution and the Novel Covid-19 Disease: a Putative Disease Risk Factor. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 4(2), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00274-4
dc.relation.referencesMcFadden, D. (1986). The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research. Marketing Science, 5(4), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.5.4.275
dc.relation.referencesMirabelli, M. C., Ebelt, S., & Damon, S. A. (2020). Air Quality Index and air quality awareness among adults in the United States. Environmental Research, 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2020.109185
dc.relation.referencesNelson, J. W., Scammell, M. K., Altman, R. G., Webster, T. F., & Ozonoff, D. M. (2009). A New Spin on Research Translation: The Boston Consensus Conference on Human Biomonitoring. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(4), 495. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP.0800037
dc.relation.referencesOMS. (2020). Las 10 principales causas de defunción. Organización Mundial de La Salud, 1(1), 1–2. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
dc.relation.referencesOMS. (2022). Calidad del aire - OPS/OMS | Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Organización Mundial de La Salud, 1(1), 1–2. https://www.paho.org/es/temas/calidad-aire
dc.relation.referencesPalacios, I. H., & Santos, T. J. (2004). A theory of markets, institutions, and endogenous preferences. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00162-7
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Cardenas, J. E. (2017). La calidad del aire en Colombia: un problema de salud pública, un problema de todos. Biosalud, 16(2), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.17151/BIOSA.2017.16.2.1
dc.relation.referencesPidgeon, N. (1998). Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 59(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2
dc.relation.referencesPotoglou, D., Palacios, J. F., & Feijóo, C. (2015). An integrated latent variable and choice model to explore the role of privacy concern on stated behavioural intentions in e-commerce. Journal of Choice Modelling, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2015.12.002
dc.relation.referencesRaveau, S., Álvarez-Daziano, R., Yáñez, M. F., Bolduc, D., & De Dios Ortúzar, J. (2010). Sequential and simultaneous estimation of hybrid discrete choice models: Some new findings. Transportation Research Record, 2156(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.3141/2156-15
dc.relation.referencesReames, T. G., & Bravo, M. A. (2019). People, place and pollution: Investigating relationships between air quality perceptions, health concerns, exposure, and individual- and area-level characteristics. Environment International, 122, 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2018.11.013
dc.relation.referencesRenn, O. (2004). Perception of risks. Toxicology Letters, 149(1–3), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOXLET.2003.12.051
dc.relation.referencesRojas-Rueda, D., Morales-Zamora, E., Alsufyani, W. A., Herbst, C. H., AlBalawi, S. M., Alsukait, R., & Alomran, M. (2021). Environmental risk factors and health: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 74–200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020704
dc.relation.referencesRopeik, D. (2020). Understanding factors of risk perception. Nieman Reports, 56(4), 52. https://niemanreports.org/articles/understanding-factors-of-risk-perception/
dc.relation.referencesRosa, E. A., Renn, O., & McCright, A. M. (2013). The risk society revisited: Social theory and governance. The Risk Society Revisited: Social Theory and Governance, 1–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306117714500GG
dc.relation.referencesRosenzweig, M. R., & Binswanger, H. P. (1993). Wealth, weather risk and the composition and profitability of agricultural investments. Economic Journal, 103(416), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234337
dc.relation.referencesSavadori, L., & Lauriola, M. (2021). Risk Perception and Protective Behaviors During the Rise of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577331
dc.relation.referencesSCOPE. (1980). Environmental risks. Comité Científico de Problemas Del Medio Ambiente, 1(1), 1–14. https://scope.dge.carnegiescience.edu/SCOPE_15/SCOPE_15_1.1_chapter1_1-14.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSemenza, J. C., Wilson, D. J., Parra, J., Bontempo, B. D., Hart, M., Sailor, D. J., & George, L. A. (2008). Public perception and behavior change in relationship to hot weather and air pollution. Environmental Research, 107(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2008.03.005
dc.relation.referencesSlovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M. L., & MacGregor, D. G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology : Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 24(4S). https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35
dc.relation.referencesSzumilas, M. (2010). Explaining Odds Ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(3), 227–229. /pmc/articles/PMC2938757/
dc.relation.referencesTilt, B. (2006). Perceptions of Risk from Industrial Pollution in China: a Comparison of Occupational Groups. Human Organization, 65(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.17730/HUMO.65.2.69DUFCR1HATNPU5V
dc.relation.referencesUeberham, M., Schlink, U., Dijst, M., & Weiland, U. (2019). Cyclists’ Multiple Environmental Urban Exposures—Comparing Subjective and Objective Measurements. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 1412, 11(5), 1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11051412
dc.relation.referencesVarela, J. M. (2018). Parameter bias in misspecified Hybrid Choice Models: An empirical study. Transportation Research Procedia, 33(12), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.081
dc.relation.referencesVoors, M. J., Nillesen, E. E. M., Verwimp, P., Bulte, E. H., Lensink, R., & Van Soest, D. P. (2012). Violent conflict and behavior: A field experiment in Burundi. American Economic Review, 102(2), 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.941
dc.relation.referencesWalker, J., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2002). Generalized random utility model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43(3), 303–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00023-9
dc.relation.referencesWen, X. J., Balluz, L., & Mokdad, A. (2009). Association between media alerts of air quality index and change of outdoor activity among adult asthma in six states, BRFSS, 2005. Journal of Community Health, 34(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10900-008-9126-4
dc.relation.referencesWildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why? Bioethics Research Library of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, 119(4), 41–60. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/840519
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, G. A., & Kibwoski, F. (2016). Latent Class Analysis and Latent Profile Analysis Glenn A . Williams Leeds Beckett University , United Kingdom Fraenze Kibowski Nottingham Trent University , United Kingdom This is a draft of a chapter that has been accepted for publication by Oxford Univ. Handbook of Methodological Approaches to Community-Based Research: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods, 4(13), 143–151. http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/35496/1/12946_Williams.pdf
dc.relation.referencesYun, K., Lurie, N., & Hyde, P. S. (2010). Moving mental health into the disaster-preparedness spotlight. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363(13), 1193–1195. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMP1008304
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembEconometría
dc.subject.proposalExperimentos de elección discreta
dc.subject.proposalClases latentes
dc.subject.proposalContaminación atmosférica
dc.subject.proposalPreferencias de riesgo
dc.subject.proposalEconomía del comportamiento
dc.subject.proposalDiscrete choice experiment
dc.subject.proposalLatent class analysis
dc.subject.proposalAtmospheric pollution
dc.subject.proposalRisk preferences
dc.subject.proposalEconomic behavior
dc.title.translatedUsing choice experiments and hybrid models to study the economic valuation of mortality risk from COVID-19 and Air Pollution in Colombia Inglés
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dc.description.curricularareaÁrea Curricular de Economía
dc.subject.wikidataRiesgo ambiental
dc.subject.wikidataContaminación atmosférica
dc.subject.wikidataPsicométrica


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito