Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorMoreno Mantilla, Carlos Eduardo
dc.contributor.advisorGarcía Díaz, Cesar Enrique
dc.contributor.authorZambrano García, Paola Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-02T15:36:26Z
dc.date.available2024-02-02T15:36:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85601
dc.descriptionilustraciones (algunas a color), diagramas, fotografías
dc.description.abstractEsta investigación encuentra en el estudio de las redes de franquicias un campo propicio para aportar en el mejoramiento de los efectos ambientales de la producción y consumo humano. El análisis se enfoca en el efecto de los mecanismos de gobernanza presentes en la relación franquiciante-franquiciado sobre la sostenibilidad ambiental y se realiza un modelo de simulación basado en agentes para comprender el fenómeno. Este modelo simula un paisaje de fitness determinado por las interdependencias (K) de las prácticas ambientales (N) para diferentes tipos de franquicias, clasificadas según el grado de implementación de estas prácticas. Así, franquicias rezagadas, seguidoras y líderes, configuran cada una un paisaje de fitness, donde en un marco definido por la configuración de mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales, se determinan cuatro modos de gobernanza (confianza, red relacional, liderazgo y gobierno formal). Con este modelo se quiere encontrar bajo qué modos de gobernanza se desarrolla una mayor capacidad de exploración, donde las decisiones locales de los franquiciados influyen en el uso de prácticas ambientales. Después de realizar entrevistas semi-estructuradas y desarrollar el modelo y hacer las simulaciones para cada modo de gobernanza, se encuentra que en modos de gobernanza donde se combinan ambos tipos de mecanismos, la capacidad de exploración es mayor, dando oportunidad a los franquiciados de explorar e incorporar el uso de prácticas ambientales en la red de franquicia. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractThis research finds the study of franchise networks a favorable field to contribute to the improvement of the environmental effects of human production and consumption. The analysis focuses on the effect of the governance mechanisms present in the franchisor-franchisee relationship on environmental sustainability and an agent-based simulation model is performed to understand the phenomenon. This model simulates a fitness landscape determined by the interdependencies (K) of environmental practices (N) for different types of franchises, classified according to the degree of implementation of these practices. Thus, lagging, following, and leading franchises each configures a fitness landscape, wherein a framework is defined by the configuration of formal and informal governance mechanisms, and four modes of governance are determined (trust, relational network, leadership, and formal government). With this model, we want to find out under which modes of governance a greater capacity for exploration is developed, where the local decisions of the franchisees influence the use of environmental practices. After conducting semi-structured interviews, developing the model, and running the simulations for each governance mode, it was found that in governance modes where both types of mechanisms are combined, the exploration capacity is greater, allowing franchisees to explore and incorporate the use of best practices. environmental in the franchise network.
dc.format.extentxx, 177 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::333 - Economía de la tierra y de la energía
dc.subject.lccAnálisis del impacto ambiental - Política gubernamental
dc.subject.lccEnvironmental impact analysis - Government policy
dc.subject.lccEconomía ambiental
dc.subject.lccEnvironmental economics
dc.titleSostenibilidad ambiental de la cadena de suministro de la franquicia: un modelo basado en agentes para el análisis de la influencia de los mecanismos de gobernanza en la adopción de prácticas verdes
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ingeniería
dc.description.researchareaIndustria y Organizaciones
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAgrawal, A., Brown, D. G., Rao, G., Riolo, R., Robinson, D. T., & Bommarito II, M. (2013). Interactions between organizations and networks in common-pool resource governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 25, 138–146.
dc.relation.referencesAhmed, W., Ashraf, M. S., Khan, S. A., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Arhin, F. K., Kusi-Sarpong, H., & Najmi, A. (2020). Analyzing the impact of environmental collaboration among supply chain stakeholders on a firm’s sustainable performance. Operations Management Research, 13, 4–21.
dc.relation.referencesAntia, K. D., Mani, S., & Wathne, K. H. (2017). Franchisor–franchisee bankruptcy and the efficacy of franchisee governance. Journal of marketing research, 54(6), 952–967.
dc.relation.referencesAssumpção, J.J., Campos, L. M. d. S., Jabbour, A. B. L. d. S., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Vazquez- Brust, D. A. (2019). Green supply chain practices: a comprehensive and theoretically multidimensional framework for categorization. Production, 29.
dc.relation.referencesBaena, Graciá, V. (2010). Teorías y líneas de investigación en el sistema de franquicia: una revisión desde los años 60 hasta 2009.
dc.relation.referencesBaker, B. L. & Dant, R. P. (2008). Stable plural forms in franchise systems: An examination of the evolution of ownership redirection research. Strategy and governance of networks: Cooperatives, franchising, and strategic alliances, (pp. 87–112).
dc.relation.referencesBakshi, B. R. (2019). Sustainable engineering: principles and practice. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBennett, J. W. (1976). The ecological transition: From equilibrium to disequilibrium. The Ecological Transition: Cultural Anthropology and Human Adaptation, (pp. 123–55).
dc.relation.referencesBharwani, S. (2004). Adaptive knowledge dynamics and emergent artificial societies: ethno- graphically based multi-agent simulations of behavioral adaptation in agro-climatic systems. University of Kent (United Kingdom).
dc.relation.referencesBlume, L. (2015). Agent-based models for policy analysis. In Assessing the Use of Agent- Based Models for Tobacco Regulation. National Academies Press (US).
dc.relation.referencesBorshchev, A. & Filippov, A. (2004). From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference of the system dynamics society, volume 22 (pp. 25–29).: Oxfort England.
dc.relation.referencesBradach, J. L. (1998). Franchise organizations. Harvard Business Press.
dc.relation.referencesBrandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European journal of operational research, 233(2), 299–312.
dc.relation.referencesBush, S. R., Oosterveer, P., Bailey, M., & Mol, A. P. (2015). Sustainability governance of chains and networks: A review and future outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 8–19.
dc.relation.referencesBuysse, K. & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.
dc.relation.referencesCarter, C. R. & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 38(5), 360–387.
dc.relation.referencesChang, P. C. E. & Kleiner, B. (2007). Managing for excellence in the food and beverages industry. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 10(3), 107–119.
dc.relation.referencesCiccullo, F., Pero, M., Gosling, J., Caridi, M., & Purvis, L. (2020). When sustainability becomes an order winner: Linking supply uncertainty and sustainable supply chain strategies. Sustainability, 12(15), 6009.
dc.relation.referencesClement, J. & Puranam, P. (2018). Searching for structure: Formal organization design as a guide to network evolution. Management Science, 64(8), 3879–3895.
dc.relation.referencesComplexSystemSociety (2022). Complex systems science. https://cssociety.org/about. Accedido en junio de 2022.
dc.relation.referencesCook, C., Grainger, M., Gore, T., Tamir, I., & Watson, G. (2014). Standing on the Sidelines: Why food and beverage companies must do more to tackle climate change. Oxfam International.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. (2009). Research desing: Quialitive, quantitive and mixed methods approaches.
dc.relation.referencesDarr, E. D., Argote, L., & Epple, D. (1995). The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science, 41(11), 1750–1762.
dc.relation.referencesDosi, G. & Marengo, L. (2015). The dynamics of organizational structures and performances under diverging distributions of knowledge and different power structures. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 535–559.
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532–550.
dc.relation.referencesEspectador, E. (2018a). Mcdonald’s cambiará pitillos de plástico por papel en irlanda y reino unido. https://www.elespectador.com/ambiente/mcdonalds-cambiara-pitillos-de-plastico- por-papel-en-irlanda-y-reino-unido-article-794555/. Accedido en junio de 2018.
dc.relation.referencesEspectador, E. (2018b). Mcdonald’s rechaza retirar pitillos de plástico de sus refrescos. https://www.elespectador.com/ambiente/mcdonalds-rechaza-retirar-pitillos-de- plastico-de-sus-refrescos-article-790442/. Accedido en mayo de 2018.
dc.relation.referencesFormentini, M. & Taticchi, P. (2016). Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 1920–1933.
dc.relation.referencesGanco, M. & Hoetker, G. (2009). Nk modeling methodology in the strategy literature: Bounded search on a rugged landscape. In Research methodology in strategy and management (pp. 237–268). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
dc.relation.referencesGavetti, G. & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.
dc.relation.referencesGere , G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of international political economy, 12(1), 78–104.
dc.relation.referencesGhobadian, A. & O’Regan, N. (2014). A case study and interview with jill mcdonald ceo and president of mcdonald’s northern europe division. Journal of Strategy and Management, 7(1), 87–100.
dc.relation.referencesGiannoccaro, I. (2011). Assessing the influence of the organization in the supply chain management using nk simulation. International journal of production economics, 131(1), 263–272.
dc.relation.referencesGimenez, C. & Sierra, V. (2013). Sustainable supply chains: Governance mechanisms to greening suppliers. Journal of business ethics, 116, 189–203.
dc.relation.referencesGimenez, C. & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: an international journal, 17(5), 531–543.
dc.relation.referencesGorovaia, N. & Windsperger, J. (2013). Determinants of knowledge transfer strategy in franchising: integrating knowledge-based and relational governance perspectives. The Service Industries Journal, 33(12), 1117–1134.
dc.relation.referencesGovindan, K., Seuring, S., Zhu, Q., & Azevedo, S. G. (2016). Accelerating the transition towards sustainability dynamics into supply chain relationship management and governance structures. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 1813–1823.
dc.relation.referencesGrace, D., Weaven, S., Frazer, L., & Giddings, J. (2013). Examining the role of franchisee normative expectations in relationship evaluation. Journal of Retailing, 89(2), 219–230.
dc.relation.referencesGreen, K. W., Zelbst, P. J., Meacham, J., & Bhadauria, V. S. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply chain management: an international journal, 17(3), 290–305.
dc.relation.referencesGrößler, A. & Schieritz, N. (2005). Of stocks, flows, agents and rules—“strategic” simulations in supply chain research. Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management: In Collaboration with Magnus Westhaus, (pp. 445–460).
dc.relation.referencesHart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, 20(4), 986–1014.
dc.relation.referencesHeide, J. B. & Wathne, K. H. (2006). Friends, businesspeople, and relationship roles: A conceptual framework and a research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 90–103.
dc.relation.referencesHuylenbroeck, G. V., Vuylsteke, A., & Verbeke, W. (2009). Public good markets: the possible role of hybrid governance structures in institutions for sustainability. Institutions and Sustainability: Political Economy of Agriculture and the Environment-Essays in Honour of Konrad Hagedorn, (pp. 175–191).
dc.relation.referencesIddy, J. J. & Alon, I. (2019). Knowledge management in franchising: a research agenda. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(4), 763–785.
dc.relation.referencesJanssen, M. A. & Ostrom, E. (2006). Empirically based, agent-based models. Ecology and society, 11(2).
dc.relation.referencesJell-Ojobor, M. & Windsperger, J. (2014). The choice of governance modes of international franchise firms—development of an integrative model. Journal of International Management, 20(2), 153–187.
dc.relation.referencesJeon, H. J. & Gleiberman, A. (2017). Examining the role of sustainability and green strategies in channels: Evidence from the franchise industry. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 25(2), 189–199.
dc.relation.referencesJia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of cleaner production, 189, 263–278.
dc.relation.referencesKalnins, A. & Mayer, K. J. (2004). Franchising, ownership, and experience: A study of pizza restaurant survival. Management Science, 50(12), 1716–1728.
dc.relation.referencesKang, M. J. & Hwang, J. (2017). Interactions among inter-organizational measures for green supply chain management. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 691–698.
dc.relation.referencesKarmeni, K., de La Villarmois, O., & Beldi, A. (2018). Impact of control on innovation: the case of franchising. Management Decision, 56(7), 1485–1505.
dc.relation.referencesKauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, USA.
dc.relation.referencesLaari, S., Töyli, J., Solakivi, T., & Ojala, L. (2016). Firm performance and customer-driven green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1960–1970.
dc.relation.referencesLabarthe, O., Espinasse, B., Ferrarini, A., & Montreuil, B. (2007). Toward a methodological framework for agent-based modelling and simulation of supply chains in a mass customization context. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15(2), 113–136.
dc.relation.referencesLaver, M. & Sergenti, E. (2011). Party competition: An agent-based model, volume 18. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLevinthal, D. A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management science, 43(7), 934–950.
dc.relation.referencesLi, J., Tangpong, C., Hung, K.-T., & R. Johns, T. (2013). The role of interfirm reciprocity norm and agent’s conscientiousness in supply contract adjustment decision. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(8), 660–671.
dc.relation.referencesMacy, M. & Sato, Y. (2008). Reply to will and hegselmann. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 11.
dc.relation.referencesManzo, G. & Matthews, T. (2014). Potentialities and limitations of agent-based simulations. Revue fran ̧caise de sociologie, 55(4), 653–688.
dc.relation.referencesMarch, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71–87.
dc.relation.referencesMarengo, L. & Pasquali, C. (2012). How to get what you want when you do not know what you want: A model of incentives, organizational structure, and learning. Organization Science, 23(5), 1298–1310.
dc.relation.referencesMarks, R. E. (2007). Validating simulation models: a general framework and four applied examples. Computational economics, 30, 265–290.
dc.relation.referencesMatinheikki, J., Kauppi, K., Brandon-Jones, A., & van Raaij, E. M. (2022). Making agency theory work for supply chain relationships: a systematic review across four disciplines. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(13), 299–334.
dc.relation.referencesMiller, J. H. & Page, S. E. (2009). Complex adaptive systems: an introduction to computational models of social life: an introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMin, H. & Kim, I. (2012). Green supply chain research: past, present, and future. Logistics Research, 4, 39–47.
dc.relation.referencesMoreno-Mantilla, C. E., Mejía-Salazar, I., Loaiza-Ramírez, J., Leguízamo-Díaz, T., & Romero-Larrahondo, P. (2018). Development and validation of a green supply chain management taxonomy in colombian smes. In International Congress on Logistics & Supply Chain–CiLOG (pp. 361–368).
dc.relation.referencesMundial, F. E. (2012). Informe de competitividad mundial 2012-13.
dc.relation.referencesOstrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422.
dc.relation.referencesOxfam, I. (2014). De brazos cruzados. https://www.oxfam.org/es/informes/ de-brazos-cruzados. Accedido en mayo de 2018.
dc.relation.referencesO’Rourke, D. (2014). The science of sustainable supply chains. Science, 344(6188), 1124– 1127.
dc.relation.referencesPagell, M. & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of supply chain management, 50(1), 44–55.
dc.relation.referencesPohoaţă, I. & Socoliuc, O.-R. (2014). Franchise’s place within sustainable development matrix: an institutional economics approach. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 21(12).
dc.relation.referencesPortafolio (2017). Casi la mitad de la contaminación que se produce en el país, proviene del altiplano cundiboyacense. https://www.portafolio.co/negocios/empresas/ contaminacion-en-colombia-2017-503504. Accedido en febrero de 2017.
dc.relation.referencesPorter, M. & Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, (pp. 120–134).
dc.relation.referencesPrats, J. O. (2003). El concepto y el análisis de la gobernabilidad. Revista instituciones y desarrollo, 14(15), 239–269.
dc.relation.referencesQuesada, F. J. M. (2006). Gilbert, Nigel; Troitzsch, Klaus (2005). simulation for the social scientist. Papers. Revista de sociologia, 80, 303–306.
dc.relation.referencesRajeev, A., Pati, R. K., Padhi, S. S., & Govindan, K. (2017). Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 162, 299–314.
dc.relation.referencesRegalado-Cerda, A. (2021). The importance of business associations in promoting the socio-environmental sustainability innovation concept. In Environment and Innovation (pp. 82–107). CRC Press.
dc.relation.referencesReiche, D. (2013). Climate policies in the us at the stakeholder level: A case study of the national football league. Energy policy, 60, 775–784.
dc.relation.referencesRing, P. S. & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic management journal, 13(7), 483–498.
dc.relation.referencesRivkin, J. W. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management science, 46(6), 824–844.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Zoya, L. G. & Roggero, P. (2015). Modelos basados en agentes: aportes epistemológicos y teóricos para la investigación social. Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, 60(225), 227–261.
dc.relation.referencesRosales-Carreón, J., García-Díaz, C., et al. (2015). Exploring transitions towards sustainable construction: The case of near-zero energy buildings in the Netherlands. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(1).
dc.relation.referencesRoy, V., Schoenherr, T., & Charan, P. (2018). The thematic landscape of literature in sustainable supply chain management (sscm): A review of the principal facets in sscm development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(4), 1091– 1124.
dc.relation.referencesSampieri, R. H. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill México.
dc.relation.referencesSancha, C., Wong, C. W., & Thomsen, C. G. (2016). Buyer–supplier relationships on environmental issues: A contingency perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1849–1860.
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Flores, R. B., Cruz-Sotelo, S. E., & Ojeda-Benitez, S. (2020). Green practices in supply chain management to improve sustainable performance. In Global Perspectives on Green Business Administration and Sustainable Supply Chain Management (pp. 45–71). IGI Global.
dc.relation.referencesSarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K.-h. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International journal of production economics, 130(1), 1–15.
dc.relation.referencesSellers, M. (2009). Corporate environmental strategy: extending the natural resource based view of the firm. 2009. 222 f. PhD thesis, Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia)-Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta.
dc.relation.referencesSeuring, S. (2013). A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decision support systems, 54(4), 1513–1520.
dc.relation.referencesSeuring, S. & Mu ̈ller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 16(15), 1699–1710.
dc.relation.referencesShane, S. (2001). Organizational incentives and organizational mortality. Organization Science, 12(2), 136–160.
dc.relation.referencesSiggelkow, N. & Rivkin, J. W. (2005). Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organization science, 16(2), 101–122.
dc.relation.referencesSmajgl, A. (2010). Challenging beliefs through multi-level participatory modelling in Indonesia. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1470–1476.
dc.relation.referencesSmajgl, A. & Barreteau, O. (2014). Empirical agent-based modelling-challenges and solutions, volume 1. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesSorenson, O. & Sørensen, J. B. (2001). Finding the right mix: Franchising, organizational learning, and chain performance. Strategic management journal, 22(6-7), 713–724.
dc.relation.referencesSrivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 53–80.
dc.relation.referencesSun, Z., Lorscheid, I., Millington, J. D., Lauf, S., Magliocca, N. R., Groeneveld, J., Balbi, S., Nolzen, H., Mu ̈ller, B., Schulze, J., et al. (2016). Simple or complicated agent-based models? a complicated issue. Environmental Modelling & Software, 86, 56–67.
dc.relation.referencesTachizawa, E. M. & Wong, C. Y. (2015). The performance of green supply chain management governance mechanisms: A supply network and complexity perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 18–32.
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO (2017). Unesco thesaurus. https://vocabularies.unesco.org/browser/ thesaurus/en/. Accedido en abril de 2017.
dc.relation.referencesVermeulen, B., Pyka, A., La Poutr ́e, J., & de Kok, A. (2018). Capability-based governance patterns over the product life-cycle: an agent-based model. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 13, 311–349.
dc.relation.referencesVurro, C., Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2009). Shaping sustainable value chains: Network determinants of supply chain governance models. Journal of business ethics, 90, 607–621.
dc.relation.referencesWalley, N. & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Reader in Business and the Environment, 36(81), 4.
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative science quarterly, (pp. 269–296).
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford university press.
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, O. E. (1998). Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed. De economist, 146, 23–58.
dc.relation.referencesWindrum, P., Fagiolo, G., & Moneta, A. (2007). Empirical validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10(2), 8.
dc.relation.referencesWindsperger, J. (2013). 27. the governance of franchising networks.
dc.relation.referencesWindsperger, J. & Gorovaia, N. (2010). Knowledge and trust as determinants of the know- ledge transfer strategy in networks. In Fifth International Conference of the School of Economics and Business in Sarajevo (ICES2010). Proceedings (pp. 1AQ).: University of Sarajevo, School of Economics and Business.
dc.relation.referencesWindsperger, J. & Yurdakul, A. (2007). The governance structure of franchising firms: a property rights approach. In economics and Management of networks: Franchising, strategic alliances, and cooperatives (pp. 69–95). Springer.
dc.relation.referencesWinston, A. (2014). The big pivot: Radically practical strategies for a hotter, scarcer, and more open world. Harvard Business Review Press.
dc.relation.referencesZaima, K. (2013). Conditions to di↵use green management into smes and the role of knowledge support: Agent-based modeling. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 17(2), 252–262.
dc.relation.referencesZhang, M., Tse, Y. K., Doherty, B., Li, S., & Akhtar, P. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: Confirmation of a higher-order model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 206–221.
dc.relation.referencesZheng, X., Lu, Y., & Chang, R. (2019). Governing behavioral relationships in megaprojects: Examining e↵ect of three governance mechanisms under project uncertainties. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(5), 04019016.
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-h. (2019). Choosing the right approach to green your supply chains. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 1(1), 54–67.
dc.relation.referencesMénard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, (pp. 345– 376).
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.agrovocSistemas de gobernanza
dc.subject.agrovocGovernance systems
dc.subject.agrovocProducción sostenible
dc.subject.agrovocSustainable production
dc.subject.lembFranquicias (Comercio minorista) - Aspectos ambientales
dc.subject.lembFranchises (retail trade) - Environmental aspects
dc.subject.proposalFranquicias
dc.subject.proposalMecanismos de gobernanza
dc.subject.proposalPrácticas ambientales
dc.subject.proposalModelo NK
dc.subject.proposalComplejidad
dc.subject.proposalFranchises
dc.subject.proposalGovernance Mechanisms
dc.subject.proposalGreen Practices
dc.subject.proposalNK Model
dc.subject.proposalComplexity
dc.title.translatedEnvironmental sustainability of the franchise supply chain: An agent-based model for analyzing the influence of governance mechanisms on the adoption of green practices
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentAdministradores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMedios de comunicación
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticos


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito