Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorVera Acevedo, Luz Dinora
dc.contributor.authorQuiroz Carvajal, Jorge Alonso
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T16:58:23Z
dc.date.available2024-02-13T16:58:23Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-30
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85695
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficos
dc.description.abstractDistintos estudios y divulgaciones científicas a nivel mundial han hallado relaciones directas y positivas entre la ética ambiental corporativa, la innovación verde, el desempeño organizacional y el desempeño ambiental. No obstante, el comprensión teórica y empírica referente al qué y al cómo, se relaciona la ética ambiental corporativa y la innovación verde y cómo influyen en el desempeño organizacional y ambiental en industrias de orden manufacturero en Colombia, son escazas y adolecen de mayores disertaciones. Por tanto, esta tesis doctoral tuvo como principal propósito determinar qué influencia tiene la racionalidad verde en industria manufacturera de mediana y baja tecnología en Colombia. La investigación se desarrolló bajo un enfoque metodológico mixto “puro” de orden concurrente “CUANTI y CUALI”. Para la recolección de la información en el enfoque “CUALI” se realizaron dos (2) estudios de caso comparativos entre organizaciones de tipo manufacturero. De otra parte, el enfoque “CUANTI” aplicó modelos de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM) para la exploración de las relaciones entre los constructos objeto de estudio, aplicándose 236 encuestas a líderes empresariales de industria manufacturera en Colombia. En suma, los resultados de esta tesis indican que la ética ambiental corporativa tiene una relación directa y positiva sobre la innovación verde y que esta a su vez, influye de manera positiva en el desempeño organizacional y ambiental. Sin embargo, la competitividad de las organizaciones puede verse afectada en la velocidad de adaptación a los mercados, ya que, las exigencias financieras para la operación pueden ser altas y las tasas de retorno lentas en el tiempo. (Tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractVarious studies and scientific disclosures worldwide have found direct and positive relationships between corporate environmental ethics, green innovation, organizational performance, and environmental performance. However, theoretical and empirical knowledge of how corporate environmental ethics and green innovation are related and how they influence organizational and environmental performance in manufacturing industries in Colombia is scarce and lacks further dissertation. Therefore, the main purpose of this doctoral thesis was to determine the influence of green rationality in Colombian medium and low-technology manufacturing industries. The research was developed under a "pure" mixed methodological approach of concurrent "QUANTITATIVE and QUALITATIVE" types. For the "QUALITATIVE" approach, two (2) comparative case studies were carried out among manufacturing organizations to gather information. The "QUANTITATIVE" approach applied structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the relationships between the constructs under study, based on a survey of 236 business leaders from Colombia’s manufacturing industry. This doctoral thesis findings reveal that corporate environmental ethics has a direct and positive relationship with green innovation and that the latter, in turn, positively influences organizational and environmental performance. Nevertheless, organizations’ competitiveness may be affected by the speed of market adaptation since the financial requirements for operating may be high while the rates of return may be slow over time.
dc.format.extent308 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines
dc.titleAnálisis de la relación de la ética ambiental corporativa y la innovación verde sobre el desempeño organizacional y ambiental
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Economia y Medio Ambiente
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.degreenameDoctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
dc.description.methodsMixta
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Minas
dc.publisher.placeMedellín, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relation.indexedLaReferencia
dc.relation.referencesAAPOR. (2010). The Code of Professional Ethics and Practices. https://www-archive.aapor.org/Standards-Ethics/AAPOR-Code-of-Ethics.aspx
dc.relation.referencesAbbas, J. (2019). Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development : A structural analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.024
dc.relation.referencesAbid, N., Ceci, F., Ahmad, F., & Aftab, J. (2022). Financial development and green innovation, the ultimate solutions to an environmentally sustainable society: Evidence from leading economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 369(September 2021), 133223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133223
dc.relation.referencesAbu Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M. Z., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211
dc.relation.referencesAdams. (2008). Green Development Environment and Sustainability in a Developing World. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929711
dc.relation.referencesAdela Cortina. (1994). La ética en la empresa 13. Etica de La Empresa , Claves Para Una Nueva Cultura Empresarial. http://aechile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Etica-MH.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAguilera-Caracuel, J., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2013). Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach. Organization and Environment, 26(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026613507931
dc.relation.referencesAlbort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Cepeda-Carrión, G., & Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2018). Potential and realized absorptive capacity as complementary drivers of green product and process innovation performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020381
dc.relation.referencesAlbort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061011
dc.relation.referencesAlbort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912–4917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052
dc.relation.referencesAldáz, j. (2017). Modelización estructural con PLS-SEM: Constructos de segundo orden. Universitat de València-Ivie.
dc.relation.referencesANDI. (2020). Colombia Balance 2019 y perspectivas 2020. http://www.andi.com.co/Uploads/ANDI - Balance 2019 y Perspectivas 2020 - VF.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAngelsen, A. (2010). The poverty-environment thesis: Was Brundtland wrong? Forum for Development Studies, 24(1): 135–154.
dc.relation.referencesArdichvili, A. (2012). Sustainability or limitless expansion: Paradigm shift in HRD practice and teaching. European Journal of Training and Development.
dc.relation.referencesArias, J. (2017). La sostenibilidad justa como paradigma sistémico ambiental. Gestión y Ambiente, 20(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v20n2.64257
dc.relation.referencesArici, H. E., & Uysal, M. (2022). Leadership, green innovation, and green creativity: a systematic review. Service Industries Journal, 42(5–6), 280–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.1964482
dc.relation.referencesASA. (2008). The American Sociological Association’s (ASA’s) Code of Ethics. American Sociological Association. American Sociological Association.
dc.relation.referencesAslinda, N., Seman, A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., & Zakuan, N. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211
dc.relation.referencesAwaluddin, I., Hamid, W., & Abady, C. (2021). The model of consumers’ intention to purchase SMEs’ green products in indonesia: Study case of SMEs in Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Quality - Access to Success, 22(184), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/22.184.09
dc.relation.referencesAzorín, J. M., & Cameron, R. (2010). The application of mixed methods in organisational research: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(2), 95–105.
dc.relation.referencesBanerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2018). Corporate Environmentalism: Antecedents and Influence of Industry Type: Https://Doi.Org/10.1509/Jmkg.67.2.106.18604, 67(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.67.2.106.18604
dc.relation.referencesBen Arfi, W., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2018a). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129(August 2017), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017
dc.relation.referencesBen Arfi, W., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2018b). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129(October 2017), 210–220.
dc.relation.referencesBhutta, A. I., Ullah, M. R., Sultan, J., Riaz, A., & Sheikh, M. F. (2022). Impact of Green Energy Production, Green Innovation, Financial Development on Environment Quality: A Role of Country Governance in Pakistan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(1), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.11986
dc.relation.referencesBisgaard, T., Henriksen, K., & Bjerre, M. (2012). Green Business Model Innovation: Conceptualisation, Next Practice and Policy. In Nordic Innovation Publication (Issue October). http://www.nordicinnovation.org/publications
dc.relation.referencesBonzanini, M., Dutra, M., Barcellos, D., & Marques, L. (2016). The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.033
dc.relation.referencesBorsatto, J. M. L. S., & Bazani, C. L. (2021). Green innovation and environmental regulations: a systematic review of international academic works. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 63751–63768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11379-7
dc.relation.referencesBossle, M. B., Dutra De Barcellos, M., Vieira, L. M., & Sauvée, L. (2016). The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.033
dc.relation.referencesCai, W. G., & Zhou, X. L. (2014). On the drivers of eco-innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.035
dc.relation.referencesCai, W., & Li, G. (2018a). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance : Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
dc.relation.referencesCai, W., & Li, G. (2018b). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
dc.relation.referencesCarnahan, S., Agarwal, R., & Campbell, B. (2010). The Effect of Firm Compensation Structures on the Mobility and Entrepreneurship of Extreme Performers. Business, 490(September 2009), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
dc.relation.referencesChan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181(Part. B), 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.006
dc.relation.referencesChang, C. H. (2011). The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0914-x
dc.relation.referencesChang, Y., Huang, Y., Li, M., & Duan, Z. (2021). Threshold effect in the relationship between environmental regulations and haze pollution: Empirical evidence from pstr estimation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312423
dc.relation.referencesChen, X., & Chen, Z. (2021). Can green finance development reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from 30 Chinese provinces. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112137
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y., Gao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2022). The Impact of Green Organizational Identity on Green Competitive Advantage: The Role of Green Ambidexterity Innovation and Organizational Flexibility. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4305900
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image - Green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Utilize structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the influence of corporate environmental ethics: The mediation effect of green human capital. Quality and Quantity, 47(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9504-3
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006a). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006b). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
dc.relation.referencesChiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016
dc.relation.referencesCIMAS. (2008). Innovación y medio ambiente. Innovación y Medio Ambiente. http://www.thinkgaureuskadi2020.eus/adjuntos/pnvDocumentos/8102_archivo.pdf
dc.relation.referencesClegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00493.x
dc.relation.referencesColciencias. (2018). Libro verde 2030 – Colciencias. Colciencias. http://repositorio.colciencias.gov.co/bitstream/handle/11146/33995/LibroVerde2030-5Julio-web _1_ %281%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.relation.referencesColombia by Fintech. (2021). El 62% de las pymes colombianas no tiene acceso a financiamiento. Fintech. https://colombiafintech.co/lineaDeTiempo/articulo/el-62-de-las-pymes-colombianas-no-tiene-acceso-a-financiamiento
dc.relation.referencesConding, J., Habidin, N. F., Mohd Zubir, A. F., Hashim, S., & Seri Lanang Jaya, N. A. (2012). The Structural Analysis of Green Innovation ( GI ) and Green Performance ( GP ) in Malaysian Automotive Industry. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(6), 172–179.
dc.relation.referencesCortina, A. (1996). El estatuto de la ética aplicada. Hermenéutica crítica de las actividades humanas. ISEGORIA, 13, 119–134.
dc.relation.referencesCortina, A. (2002). La dimensión pública de las éticas aplicadas. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 29, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie290950
dc.relation.referencesCortina, A. (2009). Ética de la Empresa: no sólo responsabilidad social. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 65(1/4), 113–127. https://serviciosenlinea.comfama.com/contenidos/servicios/Gerenciasocial/html/Cursos/Oxford/documentos _estudio/Adela_Cortina_Etica_empresarial_y_responsabilidad_social_2009.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCortina, A., Martínez, E., & Cobucci, S. (2005). Ética. Ediciones Akal.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2019). Encuesta anual manufacturera en Colombia. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/eam/boletin_eam_2019.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDangelico, R. M. (2015a). Improving Firm Environmental Performance and Reputation: The Role of Employee Green Teams. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1842
dc.relation.referencesDangelico, R. M. (2015b). Improving Firm Environmental Performance and Reputation: The Role of Employee Green Teams. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1842
dc.relation.referencesDangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0
dc.relation.referencesDavid. L. Morgan. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470750841.ch9
dc.relation.referencesDe-Berríos, O. G & Briceño, M. Y. (2009). (2009). Enfoques epistemológicos que orientan la investigación de 4to. nivel. Visión Gerencial, 8(Esp), 47–54. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4655/465545882009.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCONPES 3918. Estrategia para la implementación de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) en Colombia, Pub. L. No. Conpes 3918 (2018). https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/3918.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2015). Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 17(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060
dc.relation.referencesDobson, A. (1998). Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and theories of distributive justice. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesDriessen, P. H., Hillebrand, B., Kok, R. A. W., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (2013). Green new product development: The pivotal role of product greenness. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2013.2246792
dc.relation.referencesEiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.012
dc.relation.referencesEl-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2018). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, December, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016
dc.relation.referencesEl-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(December), 483–498.
dc.relation.referencesEurostat. (2018). Eurostat indicators on High-tech industry and Knowledge-intensive services. Eurostat, 3. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/Annexes/htec_esms_an3.pdf
dc.relation.referencesFaul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
dc.relation.referencesFeilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691
dc.relation.referencesFerrell, O. C., Harrison, D. E., Ferrell, L., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 95(January), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.039
dc.relation.referencesFiedler, P. L., & Jain, S. K. (1992). Conservation biology: The theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation and management. New York/London: Chapman & Hall. Fleith de Medeiros, J., Bisognin Garlet, T., Duarte Ribeiro, J. L., & Nogueira
dc.relation.referencesFoladori, G., & Tommasino, H. (2000). El enfoque técnico y el enfoque social de la sustentabilidad. Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento, 98, 67–75.
dc.relation.referencesFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (2016). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research This, 18(1), 39–50.
dc.relation.referencesFrancione, G. L., & Carlton, A. (2015). Animal rights: The abolitionist approach. Newark: Exempla Press.
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, R. E., York, J. G., & Stewart, L. (2008). Environment, Ethics, and Business. In Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics. Thought Leader Commentary.
dc.relation.referencesFremeth, A. R., & Richter, B. K. (2011). Profiting from environmental regulatory uncertainty: Integrated strategies for competitive advantage. California Management Review, 54(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.145
dc.relation.referencesGallopín, G. C. (2003). A systems approach to sustainability and sustainable development. ECLAC.
dc.relation.referencesGardiner, S. M., & Thompson, A. (2017). The Oxford handbook of environmental ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGarriga, E., & Melé, D. (2013). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Citation Classics from The Journal of Business Ethics: Celebrating the First Thirty Years of Publication, 53(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4126-3_4
dc.relation.referencesGhobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021). Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4237–4257. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2867
dc.relation.referencesGodfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.750
dc.relation.referencesGoel, M., & Ramanathan, M. P. E. (2014). Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility – Is there a Dividing Line? Procedia Economics and Finance, 11(14), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00175-0
dc.relation.referencesGuinot, J., Barghouti, Z., & Chiva, R. (2022). Understanding Green Innovation: A Conceptual Framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105787
dc.relation.referencesGuoyou, Q., Saixing, Z., Chiming, T., Haitao, Y., & Hailiang, Z. (2013). Stakeholders’ Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.283
dc.relation.referencesHair, J.; Hult, T.; Ringle, C. & Sartedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
dc.relation.referencesHaley, U., & Schuler, D. A. (2011). Government policy and firm strategy in the solar photovoltaic industry: Implications for technology and production. California Management Review, 54(1): 17–39.
dc.relation.referencesHan, M., Lin, H., Wang, J., Wang, Y., & Jiang, W. (2019). Turning corporate environmental ethics into firm performance: The role of green marketing programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2290
dc.relation.referencesHan, M., & Xu, B. (2021). Distance with Customers Effects on Green Product Innovation in SMEs: A Way Through Green Value Co-creation. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061539
dc.relation.referencesHashim, R., Bock, A. J., & Cooper, S. (2015). The Relationship between Absorptive Capacity and Firm Innovation Performance. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 9(4), 31. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsocd&AN=edsocd.jsjjyglyj201104007&site=eds-live&scope=site
dc.relation.referencesHe, F., Miao, X., Wong, C. W. Y., & Lee, S. (2018). Contemporary corporate eco-innovation research : A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 502–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.314
dc.relation.referencesHernandez Sampieri, R., Fernandez Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Definición del alcance de la investigación a realizar: exploratoria, descriptiva, correlacional o explicativa. In Metodología de la investigación. http://www.casadellibro.com/libro-metodologia-de-la-investigacion-5-ed-incluye-cd-rom/9786071502919/1960006
dc.relation.referencesHerrero, L. M. (2002). La sostenibilidad como proceso de equilibrio dinámico y adaptación al cambio. Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de Economía., 65–84.
dc.relation.referencesHuang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2017). Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y
dc.relation.referencesIrfan, M., Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., & Yang, X. (2022). Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121882
dc.relation.referencesJ.E., Carranza, A., F., Ias-Rodríguez, J., Bejarano, C., Casas, A.X., González-Ramírez, S.A., Moreno-Burbano, &, & González-Ramírez, A. X. (2018). La industria colombiana en el siglo XXI. Revista Ensayos Sobre Política Económica;, 87, 1–69.
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
dc.relation.referencesJonas, H. (2014). El principio de responsabilidad: ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica.
dc.relation.referencesKammerbauer, J. (2001). Las dimensiones de la sostenibilidad: Fundamentos ecológicos, modelos paradigmáticos y senderos. Interciencia.
dc.relation.referencesKaptein, M. (2004). Code of Cond 2. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000021051.53460.da
dc.relation.referencesKerlinger, F. & Lee, H. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento. Métodos de investigación en las ciencias sociales. México: McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. J., Kaur, P., Jabeen, F., & Dhir, A. (2021). Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3273–3296. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2802
dc.relation.referencesKhanra, S., Dhir, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2020). Big data analytics and enterprises: a bibliometric synthesis of the literature. Enterprise Information Systems, 14(6), 737–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1734241
dc.relation.referencesKhanra, S., Kaur, P., Joseph, R. P., Malik, A., & Dhir, A. (2022a). A resource-based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1395–1413. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2961
dc.relation.referencesKhanra, S., Kaur, P., Joseph, R. P., Malik, A., & Dhir, A. (2022b). A resource-based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1395–1413. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2961
dc.relation.referencesKing, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2009). Lean and Green? an Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Lean Production and Environmental Performance. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00373.x
dc.relation.referencesLee, K. H., Cin, B. C., & Lee, E. Y. (2016). Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1855
dc.relation.referencesLee, K. H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114
dc.relation.referencesLeenders, M. A. A. M., & Chandra, Y. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of green innovation in the wine industry: The role of channel structure. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.759203
dc.relation.referencesLele, S. M. (1991). Suatainable Development: Critical Review. In World Development (Vol. 19, Issue 6, pp. 607–621).
dc.relation.referencesLi, C., Firdousi, S. F., & Afzal, A. (2022). China’s Jinshan Yinshan sustainability evolutionary game equilibrium research under government and enterprises resource constraint dilemma. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(27), 41012–41036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18786-y
dc.relation.referencesLi, D., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Cao, C. (2018). Impact of quality management on green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.158
dc.relation.referencesLi, G., Wang, X., & Wu, J. (2019). How scientific researchers form green innovation behavior: An empirical analysis of China’s enterprises. 56(June 2018), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.09.012
dc.relation.referencesLi, M., Tian, Z., Liu, Q., & Lu, Y. (2022). Literature Review and Research Prospect on the Drivers and Effects of Green Innovation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169858
dc.relation.referencesLi, W., Wang, J., Chen, R., Xi, Y., Qiang, S., Wu, F., ;Masoud, M., & Wu, X. (2019). Innovation-driven industrial green development : The moderating role of regional factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.027
dc.relation.referencesLin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.001
dc.relation.referencesLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2009). Berbagai Paradigma yang Bersaing dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 129–145.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Y., Liu, S., Shao, X., & He, Y. (2022). Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation: Evidence from China’s carbon emissions trading policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153(October 2021), 111779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111779
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2017). Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity. International Journal of Production Economics, 187(March), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.007
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Santamaría. (2017). Retos de la Formación Doctoral: Hacia la Disciplinarización de los Estudios Organizacionales. Doctoral Training Challenges: Toward Disciplining Organizational Studies. PODIUM, 31, 30–41.
dc.relation.referencesLozano, J.-F. (2007). Códigos éticos y auditorías éticas. En este artículo vamos a presentar una definición.
dc.relation.referencesLozano, J.-F. (2013). Ethical decision making in business: The contribution of neuroethics. Daimon, 59, 213–226.
dc.relation.referencesLuan, N. T., Hau, D. N. D., & Thu, N. T. A. (2022). The Influence of Green Product Development Performance to Enhance Enterprise Effectiveness and Innovation. Economies, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050113
dc.relation.referencesLuffiego y Rabadán. (2000). La evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad y su introducción en la enseñanza. Ensenanza de Las Ciencias, 18(3), 473–486.
dc.relation.referencesMa, X., Ock, Y.-S., Wu, F., & Zhang, Z. (2022). The Effect of Internal Control on Green Innovation: Corporate Environmental Investment as a Mediator. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031755
dc.relation.referencesMa, Y., Hou, G., & Xin, B. (2017). Green process innovation and innovation benefit: The mediating effect of firm image. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101778
dc.relation.referencesMacedo, B. (2005). El concepto de sostenibilidad. Ofiicina Regional de Educacion Para America Latina y El Caribe-UNESCO, 4.
dc.relation.referencesMackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Paradigms, Methods and Methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16(3), 213–231.
dc.relation.referencesMcWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4011987
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, A. D., Brooks, G. R., & Goes, J. B. (1990). Environmental Jolts and Industry Revolutions: Organizational Responses to Discontinuous Change. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 93–110. http://202.154.59.182/ejournal/files/ENVIRONMENTAL JOLTS AND INDUSTRY REVOLUTIONS- ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO DISCONTINUOUS CHANGE.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMonje Álvarez, C. A. (2011). Metodología de la investigación cuantitativa y cualitativa. Guía didáctica. Universidad Surcolombiana, 1–216. http://carmonje.wikispaces.com/file/view/Monje+Carlos+Arturo+-+Guía+didáctica+Metodología+de+la+investigación.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz-Martín, J. (2013). Ética empresarial, Responsabilidad Social Corporativa (RSC) y Creación de Valor Compartido (CVC). Journal Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability, 7(3), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.3232/GCG.2013.V7.N3.05
dc.relation.referencesMurshed, M., Mahmood, H., Ahmad, P., Rehman, A., & Alam, M. S. (2022). Pathways to Argentina’s 2050 carbon-neutrality agenda: the roles of renewable energy transition and trade globalization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(20), 29949–29966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17903-7
dc.relation.referencesNæss, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep: Long-range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16: 95–100.
dc.relation.referencesNeumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms.
dc.relation.referencesNikpour, A. (2017). The impact of organizational culture on organizational performance: The mediating role of employee’s organizational commitment. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2017.60432
dc.relation.referencesNoreña, A. L., Alcaraz-Moreno, N., Rojas, J. G., & Rebolledo-Malpica, D. (2012). Aplicabilidad de los criterios de rigor y éticos en la investigación cualitativa. Aquichan, 12(3), 263–274.
dc.relation.referencesNorström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A., Campbell, B. M., Canadell, J. G., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Fulton, E. A., Gaffney, O., Gelcich, S., Jouffray, J. B., Leach, M., … Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3(3), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
dc.relation.referencesNorth, B. G. (1987). Conservation and preservation: A conceptual rehabilitation. Environmental Ethics, 8(3): 195–220.
dc.relation.referencesOECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. In The Measurement of Scientific; Technological and Innovation Activities. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oslo-manual-2018_9789264304604-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oslo-manual-2018_9789264304604-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/scie
dc.relation.referencesOECD, European Commission, & Eurostat. (2005). Manual de Oslo. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación. Eurostat, OCDE. http://www.itq.edu.mx/convocatorias/manualdeoslo.pdf
dc.relation.referencesOMPI. (2021). Índice Mundial de Innovación 2021. Indice Mundial de Innovacion, 1–28. https://tind.wipo.int/record/44367
dc.relation.referencesOnwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 114–139. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.3.2.114
dc.relation.referencesOnwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality and Quantity, 41(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1
dc.relation.referencesOrlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
dc.relation.referencesOrrego, R., & Guevara, D. (2008). Responsabilidad social empresarial: entre la ética discursiva y la Racionalidad técnica. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, 62, 125–139.
dc.relation.referencesOrsato, R. J. (2006). Competitive Environmental Strategies: California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.
dc.relation.referencesPadrón, J. (2007). Tendencias Epistemológicas de la Investigación Científica en el Siglo XXI. Cinta de Moebio, 28, 1–28.
dc.relation.referencesPaniagua, S. G., García, L. D. R., & Arias-Pérez, J. (2017). Capacity for information technologies and organizational performance: Mediating effect of the absorption capacity. Cuadernos de Administracion, 30(55), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao30-55.ctido
dc.relation.referencesParra-Sabaj. (2005). Fundamentos epistemológicos, metodológicos y teóricos que sustentan un modelo de investigación cualitativa en las ciencias sociales. Universidad de Chile. Facultad de ciencias sociales facultad de filosofía y humanidades. Doctorado en filosofía con mención en epistemología de las ciencias sociales. Santiago – Chile.
dc.relation.referencesPearce, D. W., & Atkinson, G. D. (2017). Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: An indicator of “weak” sustainability. Sustainability, 8, 397–402. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315241951-34
dc.relation.referencesPenalva, C., Alaminos, A., Fránces, F. y Santacreu, O. (2015). La investigación cualitativa: técnica de investigación y análisis con Atlas t.i.,. PYDLOS Ediciones.
dc.relation.referencesPeng, Y., Fan, Y., & Liang, Y. (2021). A green technological innovation efficiency evaluation of technology-based smes based on the undesirable sbm and the malmquist index: A case of hebei province in china. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911079
dc.relation.referencesPerdomo, G. (2012). Análisis del cambio organizacional e institucional. Estudio comparado de dos incubadoras de empresas: “Centro Integral de Servicios Empresariales (CREAME) en Medellin, Colombia (1996- 2010) y Barcelona Activa, Barcelona, España (1986- 2010).” Universidad EAFIT.
dc.relation.referencesPojman, L. P., & Fieser, J. (2011). Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong. http://dl.booktolearn.com/ebooks2/science/philosophy/9781111298173_ethics_bd79.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPopesku, M. (2015). Clarifying value use and value creation process. University of Nottingham.
dc.relation.referencesPorter & Kramer. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12): 78–92.
dc.relation.referencesPrzychodzen, W., Leyva-de la Hiz, D. I., & Przychodzen, J. (2020). First-mover advantages in green innovation—Opportunities and threats for financial performance: A longitudinal analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1809
dc.relation.referencesQiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1780
dc.relation.referencesRaufflet, E. ., Lozano, J. F. ., Barrera, E. ., & García de la Torre, C. (2012). Responsabilidad social empresarial.
dc.relation.referencesRawwas, M. Y. A., Arjoon, S., & Sidani, Y. (2013). An Introduction of Epistemology to Business Ethics: A Study of Marketing Middle-Managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1537-6
dc.relation.referencesRennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.013
dc.relation.referencesRueda-Manzanares, A., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2008). The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: The moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence. In British Journal of Management (Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 185–203). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00538.x
dc.relation.referencesSalehi, K., & Golafshani, N. (2010). Commentary: Using mixed methods in research studies: An opportunity with its challenges. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.186
dc.relation.referencesSalvadó, Javier Amores; De Castro Gregorio Martin; Navas Jose Emilio; Delgado, M. (2012). Innovación medio ambiental: conceptualización, tratamiento empirico y propuestas de futuro. Universidad Complutence de Madrid, 1–24.
dc.relation.referencesSalzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A. M., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007
dc.relation.referencesSanabria, M., Saavedra, J. J., & Smida, A. (2014). Los estudios organizacionales ('organization studies’): fundamentos, evolución y estado actual del campo. Universidad del Rosario.
dc.relation.referencesSandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Barroso, J. (2006). Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies. Research in the Schools : A Nationally Refereed Journal Sponsored by the Mid-South Educational Research Association and the University of Alabama, 13(1), 29. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098638%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC2809982
dc.relation.referencesSandoval, A. V. (2022). Recuperación económica y del tejido empresarial en recuperación económica y del tejido empresarial en Colombia. Banca & Economía, 1341, 1–12. https://www.asobancaria.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/1341_BE.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSanni, M. (2018). Drivers of eco-innovation in the manufacturing sector of Nigeria. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131(October 2016), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.007
dc.relation.referencesSaunila, M., Ukko, J., & Rantala, T. (2018). Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.211
dc.relation.referencesSchaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944
dc.relation.referencesScherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x
dc.relation.referencesSchiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review. R and D Management, 42(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00672.x
dc.relation.referencesSchuler, D. A., Rehbein, K., & Cramer, R. D. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069303
dc.relation.referencesSchuler, D., Rasche, A., Etzion, D., & Newton, L. (2017a). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Corporate Sustainability Management and Environmental Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.80
dc.relation.referencesSchuler, D., Rasche, A., Etzion, D., & Newton, L. (2017b). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Corporate Sustainability Management and Environmental Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.80
dc.relation.referencesSchwartz, M. S. (2005). Universal moral values for corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3403-2
dc.relation.referencesSchwartz, M. S. (2016). Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8
dc.relation.referencesSegarra-Oña, M., Peiró-Signes, A., Miret-Pastor, L., & Albors-Garrigós, J. (2011). ¿Eco-innovación, una evolución de la innovación? Análisis empírico en la industria cerámica española. Boletin de La Sociedad Espanola de Ceramica y Vidrio, 50(5), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.3989/cyv.332011
dc.relation.referencesharma, V. K., Chandna, P., & Bhardwaj, A. (2017). Green supply chain management related performance indicators in agro industry: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1194–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.103
dc.relation.referencesShort, J. C., McKenny, A. F., Ketchen, D. J., Snow, C. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). An Empirical Examination of Firm, Industry, and Temporal Effects on Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society, 55(8), 1122–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315574848
dc.relation.referencesShu, X., Li, M., Ma, Z., & Qureshi, M. A. (2022). The asymmetric effect of film and drama industry, energy efficiency and economic growth on green innovation: Empirical evidence from quantile estimation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja . https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2032784
dc.relation.referencesSimmons, J. (2008). Ethics and morality in human resource management. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110810856794
dc.relation.referencesSinger, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Random House.
dc.relation.referencesSinger, P. (1993). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSinger, P. (2007). Pratical Ethics. Cambridge University Press .
dc.relation.referencesSingh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 500–514.
dc.relation.referencesSkala, A. (2022). Sustainable Transport and Mobility—Oriented Innovative Startups and Business Models. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095519
dc.relation.referencesSnyder, H. (2019a). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(August), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
dc.relation.referencesSnyder, H. (2019b). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(August), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
dc.relation.referencesSOLABILITY. (2017). The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index 2017. 1–60. http://solability.com/the-global-sustainable-competitiveness-index/the-index Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization
dc.relation.referencesSOLABILITY. (2017). The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index 2017. 1–60. http://solability.com/the-global-sustainable-competitiveness-index/the-index Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604042409
dc.relation.referencesStarik, M., & Kanashiro, P. (2013). Toward a Theory of Sustainability Management: Uncovering and Integrating the Nearly Obvious. Organization and Environment, 26(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612474958
dc.relation.referencesStucki, T., Woerter, M., Arvanitis, S., Peneder, M., & Rammer, C. (2018). How different policy instruments affect green product innovation: A differentiated perspective. Energy Policy, 114(December 2017), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.049
dc.relation.referencesSu, H. Y. (2014). Business Ethics and the Development of Intellectual Capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1623-4
dc.relation.referencesSukamolson, S. (2007). Fundamentals of quantitative research Suphat Sukamolson, Ph.D. Language Institute Chulalongkorn University. Language Institute, 20. https://doi.org/9781848608641
dc.relation.referencesSuriyankietkaew, S., Krittayaruangroj, K., & Iamsawan, N. (2022). Sustainable Leadership Practices and Competencies of SMEs for Sustainability and Resilience: A Community-Based Social Enterprise Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105762
dc.relation.referencesTang, M., Walsh, G., Lerner, D., Fitza, M. A., & Li, Q. (2018). Green Innovation, Managerial Concern and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1981
dc.relation.referencesTariq, A., Badir, Y., & Chonglerttham, S. (2019). Green innovation and performance: moderation analyses from Thailand. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(3), 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2018-0148
dc.relation.referencesTariq, A., Ehsan, S., Badir, Y. F., Memon, M. A., & Khan Sumbal, M. . (2022). Does green process innovation affect a firm’s financial risk? The moderating role of slack resources and competitive intensity. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2021-0265
dc.relation.referencesTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social &Behavioral Research. In 2a ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks. CA, EEUU.
dc.relation.referencesTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2015). Overview of Contemporary Issues in Mixed Methods Research. In SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n1
dc.relation.referencesTecnalia. (2018). Estudio en la intensidad de utilización de materiales y economía circular en Colombia para la Misión de Crecimiento Verde. Producto 1.
dc.relation.referencesTeddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
dc.relation.referencesTeddlie & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
dc.relation.referencesTeddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2012). Common “Core” Characteristics of Mixed Methods Research: A Review of Critical Issues and Call for Greater Convergence. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433795
dc.relation.referencesTeddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
dc.relation.referencesTrad, N. (2018). Countries 2018 Country RepTrak ® Today ’ s presenters.
dc.relation.referencesTurner, B. L., & Thompson, A. L. (2013). Beyond the Paleolithic prescription: Incorporating diversity and flexibility in the study of human diet evolution. Nutrition Reviews, 71(8), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/nure.12039
dc.relation.referencesVan Leeuwen, G., & Mohnen, P. (2017). Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: an empirical analysis of Green innovation for the Netherlands. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1–2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202521
dc.relation.referencesVelenturf, A. P. M., & Purnell, P. (2021). Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018
dc.relation.referencesVera Acevedo, L. D., & Peláez Villada, D. C. (2013). Análisis de los dominios ético, legal y económico de la responsabilidad social empresarial: un caso empresarial. Civilizar, 13(25), 85. https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.130
dc.relation.referencesWaddock, S. (2008). Corporate responsibility/corporate citizenship: The development of a construct. Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship, 50-73.
dc.relation.referencesWaldau, P. (2011). Animal rights: What everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWang, M., Li, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2021). Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: A survey and structural model. Journal of Environmental Management, 297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113282
dc.relation.referencesWang, Q. J., Wang, H. J., & Chang, C. P. (2022). Environmental performance, green finance and green innovation: What’s the long-run relationships among variables? Energy Economics, 110(October 2021), 106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106004
dc.relation.referencesWong, S. K. S. (2012). The influence of green product competitiveness on the success of green product innovation: Empirical evidence from the Chinese electrical and electronics industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 468–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272385
dc.relation.referencesWoo, C., Chung, Y., Chun, D., Han, S., & Lee, D. (2014). Impact of green innovation on labor productivity and its determinants: An analysis of the Korean manufacturing industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(8), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1807
dc.relation.referencesWorld Economic Forum. (2022). Global Gender Gap Report 2022. Insight Report. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2022.pdf
dc.relation.referencesXavier, A. F., Naveiro, R. M., Aoussat, A., & Reyes, T. (2017). Systematic literature review of eco-innovation models: Opportunities and recommendations for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 1278–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.145
dc.relation.referencesXiang, X., Liu, C., & Yang, M. (2022). Who is financing corporate green innovation? International Review of Economics and Finance, 78(December 2021), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.12.011
dc.relation.referencesXie, X., Huo, J., Qi, G., & Zhu, K. X. (2016). Green Process Innovation and Financial Performance in Emerging Economies: Moderating Effects of Absorptive Capacity and Green Subsidies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2015.2507585
dc.relation.referencesXie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019a). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research, 101(January), 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010
dc.relation.referencesXie, X., Zhu, Q., & Wang, R. (2019). Turning green subsidies into sustainability: How green process innovation improves firms’ green image. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2323
dc.relation.referencesXue, M., Boadu, F., & Xie, Y. (2019). The penetration of green innovation on firm performance: Effects of absorptive capacity and managerial environmental concern. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092455
dc.relation.referencesYale University. (2018). Environmental Performance Index.
dc.relation.referencesYan, C., Di, D., Li, G., & Wang, J. (2022). Environmental regulation and the supply efficiency of environmental public services: Evidence from environmental decentralization of 289 cities in China. Growth and Change, 53(2), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12596
dc.relation.referencesYan, Z., Shi, R., Du, K., & Yi, L. (2022). The role of green production process innovation in green manufacturing: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2083569
dc.relation.referencesYao, Q. ., Zeng, S. . &, & Gong, S. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation , and corporate financial performance : A content analysis method ☆. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229(June 2018), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
dc.relation.referencesYao, Q., Zeng, S., Sheng, S., & Gong, S. (2019). Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09664-2
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. (2003). Investigación sobre estudio de casos. Diseño y métodos., London, SAGE.
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. (2014). Case study research: desing and methods. SAGE, California.
dc.relation.referencesYuan, B., & Cao, X. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society, 68(December 2021), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101868
dc.relation.referencesZhang, D., Rong, Z., & Ji, Q. (2019). Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144(November 2018), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.023
dc.relation.referencesZhang, D., Zheng, M., Feng, G.-F., & Chang, C.-P. (2022). Does an environmental policy bring to green innovation in renewable energy? Renewable Energy, 195, 1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.074
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020a). Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121701.
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020b). Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembEtica de los negocios
dc.subject.lembEtica del medio ambiente
dc.subject.lembResponsabilidad social de los negocios
dc.subject.proposalÉtica Ambiental Corporativa
dc.subject.proposalInnovación de verde producto
dc.subject.proposalInnovación de verde proceso
dc.subject.proposalDesempeño organizacional
dc.subject.proposalDesempeño ambiental
dc.subject.proposalCorporate environmental ethics
dc.subject.proposalGreen product innovation
dc.subject.proposalGreen process innovation
dc.subject.proposalOrganizational performance
dc.subject.proposalEnvironmental performance
dc.subject.unescoEtica ambiental
dc.title.translatedAnalysis of the relationship between corporate environmental ethics and green innovation on organizational and environmental performance
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dc.description.curricularareaIngeniería Administrativa E Ingeniería Industrial.Sede Medellín


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito