Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorCarrillo González, Gloria Mabel
dc.contributor.authorCorredor Parra, Lina Rocío
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-17T22:35:12Z
dc.date.available2024-06-17T22:35:12Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86249
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: El cáncer de próstata es el cáncer de mayor prevalencia en hombres. La enfermedad y el tratamiento generan síntomas urinarios, intestinales, sexuales, hormonales y emocionales que repercuten en el rendimiento funcional de los hombres quienes las padecen, el automanejo de los síntomas ha sido considerada desde la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) como una estrategia para permitir que los hombres puedan conocer mejor su enfermedad y generar habilidades para manejarla desde un ámbito domiciliario. Objetivo: Determinar la efectividad de la Intervención Prostactive para el automanejo de síntomas y su repercusión en el rendimiento funcional, en personas con cáncer de próstata en tratamiento que asisten a la Unidad Oncológica de la Clínica Nogales entre 2022 y 2023. Materiales y métodos: Es un diseño experimental paralelo determinado por la conformación aleatoria de dos grupos con un tamaño de muestra de 100 participantes, 50 para el control (GC) que recibirá el cuidado habitual y 50 para el experimental (GI) al cual se implementó la intervención Prostactive que consta de 4 sesiones presenciales en las cuales se le explicará cómo manejar los síntomas que presenta debido al cáncer de próstata y el tratamiento. Posteriormente se realizó el seguimiento telefónico para conocer el estado de salud a la semana 8 después de las sesiones presenciales. Resultados: la Intervención Prostactive mejoró los niveles de autoeficacia en los participantes del GI, el rendimiento funcional (0,0001) además del automanejo de síntomas urinarios con diferencias estadísticamente significativas frente al GC. No se identificaron cambios en los síntomas obstructivos (valor P= 0.6), síntomas sexuales y síntomas hormonales. Conclusión: La Intervención Prostactive mejora el automanejo de síntomas en hombres con CP en tratamiento, además de la autoeficacia y el Rendimiento Funcional. (Texto tomado de la fuente).
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Prostate cancer is more prevalent in men. The disease and treatment generate urinary, intestinal, sexual, hormonal and emotional symptoms that impact the functional performance of men who suffer from them. Self-management of symptoms has been considered since the World Health Organization (WHO) as a strategy to allow men to better understand their disease and generate skills to manage it from a home environment. Objective: Determine the effectiveness of the Prostactive Intervention for the selfmanagement of symptoms and its impact on functional performance, in people with prostate cancer undergoing treatment who attend the Oncology Unit of the Nogales Clinic between 2022 and 2023. Materials and methods: It is a parallel experimental design determined by the random formation of two groups with a sample size of 100 participants, 50 for the control (CG) who will receive the usual care and 50 for the experimental (GI) to which the Prostactive intervention was implemented, which It consists of 4 face-to-face sessions in which you will be explained how to manage the symptoms you present due to prostate cancer and the treatment. Subsequently, telephone follow-up was carried out to determine the health status at week 8 after the face-to-face sessions. Results: the Prostactive Intervention improved the levels of self-efficacy in the IG participants, functional performance (0.0001) in addition to the self-management of urinary symptoms with statistically significant differences compared to the CG. No changes were identified in obstructive symptoms (P value= 0.6), sexual symptoms, and hormonal symptoms. Conclusion: The Prostactive Intervention improves symptom self-management in men with CP undergoing treatment, in addition to self-efficacy and Functional Performance.
dc.description.sponsorshipMinciencias: bajo el Marco de la Convocatoria de Becas de Excelencia Doctoral del Bicentenario Corte I.
dc.format.extentxviii, 202 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::616 - Enfermedades
dc.titleEfectividad de la intervención de enfermería Prostactive para el automanejo de síntomas en hombres con cáncer de próstata en tratamiento
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Enfermería - Doctorado en Enfermería
dc.contributor.researchgroupCuidado y Práctica en Enfermería, Salud Familiar Enfermería Familiar y Medicion en Salud
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Enfermería
dc.description.methodsEs un diseño experimental paralelo determinado por la conformación aleatoria de dos grupos con un tamaño de muestra de 100 participantes, 50 para el control (GC) que recibirá el cuidado habitual y 50 para el experimental (GI) al cual se implementó la intervención Prostactive que consta de 4 sesiones presenciales en las cuales se le explicará cómo manejar los síntomas que presenta debido al cáncer de próstata y el tratamiento. Posteriormente se realizó el seguimiento telefónico para conocer el estado de salud a la semana 8 después de las sesiones presenciales.
dc.description.researchareaPráctica de enfermería
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Enfermería
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesOMS. Directrices de la OMS sobre intervenciones de autocuidado para la salud y el bienestar, revisión 2022. Ginebra; 2022.
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ. Enhancing self-efficacy for optimized patient outcomes through the theory of symptom self-management. Cancer Nurs. 2013 Jan;36(1).
dc.relation.referencesWhite LL, Kupzyk KA, Berger AM, Cohen MZ, Bierman PJ. Self-efficacy for symptom management in the acute phase of hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A pilot study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing [Internet]. 2019;42(November 2018):21–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2019.07.006
dc.relation.referencesBlomberg K, Wengström Y, Sundberg K, Browall M, Isaksson AK, Nyman MH, et al. Symptoms and self-care strategies during and six months after radiotherapy for prostate cancer - Scoping the perspectives of patients, professionals and literature. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2016;21:139–45.
dc.relation.referencesReeve BB, Tan X, Chen RC, Usinger DS, Pinheiro LC. Symptom and function profiles of men with localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2018;124(13):2832–40.
dc.relation.referencesHaack M, Kofahl C, Kramer S, Seidel G, von dem Knesebeck O, Dierks ML. Participation in a prostate cancer support group and health literacy. Psychooncology. 2018;27(10):2473–81.
dc.relation.referencesPaterson C, Nabi G. A Model of Consultation in Prostate Cancer Care: Evidence From a Systematic Review. Cancer Nurs. 2017;40(4):276–88.
dc.relation.referencesBernat JK, Wittman DA, Hawley ST, Hamstra DA, Helfand AM, Haggstrom DA, et al. Symptom burden and information needs in prostate cancer survivors: a case for tailored long-term survivorship care. BJU Int. 2016 Sep 1;118(3):372–8.
dc.relation.referencesGrunfeld EA, Hunter MS, Yousaf O. Men’s experience of a guided self-help intervention for hot flushes associated with prostate cancer treatment. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(4):425–33.
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud. El cáncer hoy [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 16]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-multi-bars?v=2020&mode=cancer&mode
dc.relation.referencesGlobocan. Cancer Today [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 29]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-multi-bars?v=2020&mode=cancer&mode_population=countries&population=900&populations=900&key=asr&sex=0&cancer=39&type=0&statistic=5&prevalence=0&population_group=0&ages_group%5B%5D=0&ages_group%5B%5D=17&nb_items=10&
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social. Guía de práctica clínica ( GPC ) para la detección temprana , seguimiento y rehabilitación del cáncer de próstata. Bogotá; 2013. 717 p.
dc.relation.referencesObservatorio Nacional de Cáncer. Incidencia cáncer de próstata en Colombia. 2022 [cited 2020 May 25]. Incidencia Cáncer de próstata en Colombia. Available from: https://www.sispro.gov.co/observatorios/oncancer/indicadores/Paginas/Cáncer-de-próstata.aspx
dc.relation.referencesCuenta de Alto Costo. Situación del cáncer en la población adulta atendida en el SGSSS de Colombia 2020 Cuenta de Alto Costo Fondo Colombiano de Enfermedades de Alto Costo. 2020.
dc.relation.referencesCuenta de Alto Costo. Día mundial de la prevención del cáncer de próstata 2023 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 20]. Available from: https://cuentadealtocosto.org/cancer/dia-mundial-de-la-prevencion-del-cancer-de-prostata-2023/
dc.relation.referencesMinisiterio de Salud y Protección Social. Observatorio Nacional de Cáncer. ONC Colombia. 2018;1–59.
dc.relation.referencesCarrillo González GM. Los grupos de síntomas en personas con cáncer: una revisión integrativa. Aquichan. 2017;17(3):257–69.
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. Ley 1384 de 2010. Ley Sandra Ceballos. Diario Oficial. 2010;2010(47):1–9.
dc.relation.referencesVergara-Dagobeth E, Suárez-Causado A, Gómez-Arias RD. Plan Control del cáncer en Colombia 2012-2021. Un análisis formal. Revista Gerencia y Politicas de Salud. 2017;16(33):16–8.
dc.relation.referencesBernat JK, Wittman DA, Hawley ST, Hamstra DA, Helfand AM, Haggstrom DA, et al. Symptom burden and information needs in prostate cancer survivors: a cancer survivos: a case for tailored long-term survivorship care. BJU Int. 2016;118(3):372–8
dc.relation.referencesSkolarus TA, Metreger T, Hwang S, Kim HM, Grubb RL, Gingrich JR, et al. Optimizing veteran-centered prostate cancer survivorship care: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):1–14.
dc.relation.referencesSkolarus TA, Wittmann D, Hawley ST. Enhancing prostate cancer survivorship care through self-management. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations [Internet]. 2017;35(9):564–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.05.008
dc.relation.referencesStanciu MA, Morris C, Makin M, Watson E, Bulger J, Evans R, et al. Trial of personalised care after treatment—Prostate cancer: A randomised feasibility trial of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(2):1–11.
dc.relation.referencesSkolarus TA, Ragnoni JA, Garlinghouse C, Schafenacker A, Webster D, Hager P, et al. Multilingual Self-Management Resources for Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Partners: Results of a Long-Term Academic-State Health Department Partnership to Promote Survivorship Care. Urology [Internet]. 2017;110:92–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.017
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud. Resolución 3280 de 2018 [Internet]. Febrero 25 2018. Available from: http://normograma.supersalud.gov.co/normograma/docs/resolucion_minsalud_r0412000.htm
dc.relation.referencesKim S, Shen S, Moore DF, Shih W, Lin Y, Li H, et al. Late gastrointestinal toxicities following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011;60(5):908–16.
dc.relation.referencesvan den Bergh RCN, Korfage IJ, Roobol MJ, Bangma CH, de Koning HJ, Steyerberg EW, et al. Sexual function with localized prostate cancer: Active surveillance vs radical therapy. BJU Int. 2012;110(7):1032–9.
dc.relation.referencesTewari A, Divine G, Chang P, Shemtov MM, Milowsky M, Nanus D, et al. Long-Term Survival in Men With High Grade Prostate Cancer: A Comparison Between Conservative Treatment, Radiation Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy-A Propensity Scoring Approach. Journal of Urology. 2007;177(3):911–5.
dc.relation.referencesFransson P, Damber JE, Widmark A. Health-related quality of life 10 years after external beam radiotherapy or watchful waiting in patients with localized prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(2):119–26.
dc.relation.referencesProstate Cancer Foundation. Prostate Cancer - Patient guide. 2022.
dc.relation.referencesLenz ER, Pugh LC. The theory of unpleasant symptoms. In: Smith M jane, Liehr patricia, editors. Middle Range Theory of Nursing. Third Edit. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2014. p. 165–95.
dc.relation.referencesSong L, Guo P, Tan X, Chen RC, Nielsen ME, Birken SA, et al. Enhancing survivorship care planning for patients with localized prostate cancer using a couple-focused web-based, mHealth program: the results of a pilot feasibility study. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2021;15(1):99–108.
dc.relation.referencesDirksen SR, Belyea MJ, Wong W, Epstein DR. Transitions in symptom cluster subgroups among men undergoing prostate cancer radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(1):3–11.
dc.relation.referencesCrawford-Williams F, March S, Goodwin BC, Ralph N, Galvão DA, Newton RU, et al. Interventions for prostate cancer survivorship: A systematic review of reviews. Psychooncology. 2018;27(10):2339–48.
dc.relation.referencesBowler M, Dehek R, Thomas E, Ngo K, Grose L. Evaluating the Impact of Post-Treatment Self-Management Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Survivors. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019;50:398–407.
dc.relation.referencesCockle-Hearne J, Barnett D, Hicks J, Simpson M, White I, Faithfull S. A web-based intervention to reduce distress after prostate cancer treatment: Development and feasibility of the getting down to coping program in two different clinical settings. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4).
dc.relation.referencesHsiao CP, Moore IM (Ki), Insel KC, Merkle CJ. Symptom self-management strategies in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(3–4):440–9.
dc.relation.referencesPaterson C, Primeau C, Pullar I, Nabi G. Development of a prehabilitation multimodal supportive care interventions for men and their partners before radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2019;42(4):E47–53.
dc.relation.referencesCockle-Hearne J, Faithfull S. Self-management for men surviving prostate cancer: A review of behavioural and psychosocial interventions to understand what strategies can work, for whom and in what circumstances. Psychooncology. 2010;19(9):909–22.
dc.relation.referencesStefanopoulou E, Yousaf O, Grunfeld EA, Hunter MS. A randomised controlled trial of a brief cognitive behavioural intervention for men who have hot flushes following prostate cancer treatment (MANCAN). Psychooncology. 2015;24(9):1159–66.
dc.relation.referencesQan’ir Y, Song L. Systematic review of technology-based interventions to improve anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life among patients with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2019;28(8):1601–13.
dc.relation.referencesCrawford-williams DF, Sonja D, Goodwin DBC, Nicholas D, Galvão PDA, Newton PRU, et al. Intervenciones para la supervivencia del cáncer de próstata : una revisión sistemática de comentarios. 2019;1–17
dc.relation.referencesSundberg K, Wengström Y, Blomberg K, Hälleberg-Nyman M, Frank C, Langius-Eklöf A. Early detection and management of symptoms using an interactive smartphone application (Interaktor) during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2017;25(7):2195–204.
dc.relation.referencesWatson E, Shinkins B, Frith E, Neal D, Hamdy F, Walter F, et al. Symptoms, unmet needs, psychological well-being and health status in survivors of prostate cancer: Implications for redesigning follow-up. BJU Int. 2016;117(6):E10–9.
dc.relation.referencesPaterson C, Primeau C, Nabi G. A pilot randomised controlled trial of a multimodal supportive care (ThriverCare) intervention for managing unmet supportive care needs in men with metastatic prostate cancer on hormonal treatment and their partner/caregivers. European Journal of Oncology Nursing [Internet]. 2018 Dec;37(March):65–73. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1462388918301297
dc.relation.referencesAnderson C, Omar M, Campbell S, Hunter K, Cody J, Glazener C. Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;(1).
dc.relation.referencesGlazener C, Boachie C, Buckley B, Cochran C, Dorey G, Grant A, et al. Urinary incontinence in men after formal one-to-one pelvic-fl oor muscle training following radical prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials. Lancet [Internet]. 2011;378:328–65. Available from: www.thelancet.com
dc.relation.referencesNovick BJ assani, Angie M, Walker E, Kitay R, Monday K, Albert NM. The Effect of Intensive Education On Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Control Trial. Urol Nurs. 2014 Sep 1;34(5):246–51.
dc.relation.referencesZopf EM, Bloch W, Machtens S, Zumbé J, Rübben H, Marschner S, et al. Effects of a 15-Month Supervised Exercise Program on Physical and Psychological Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Following Prostatectomy: The ProRehab Study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2015 Sep 18;14(5):409–18.
dc.relation.referencesCentemero A, Rigatti L, Giraudo D, Lazzeri M, Lughezzani G, Zugna D, et al. Preoperative Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise for Early Continence After Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomised Controlled Study. Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):1039–44.
dc.relation.referencesGeraerts I, Van Poppel H, Devoogdt N, Joniau S, Van Cleynenbreugel B, De Groef A, et al. Influence of preoperative and postoperative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with postoperative PFMT on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):766–72.
dc.relation.referencesDijkstra-Eshuis J, Van Den Bos TWL, Splinter R, Bevers RFM, Zonneveld WCG, Putter H, et al. Effect of preoperative pelvic floor muscle therapy with biofeedback versus standard care on stress urinary incontinence and quality of life in men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A randomised control trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Feb 1;34(2):144–50.
dc.relation.referencesNeal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Davis M, Young GJ, et al. Ten-year Mortality, Disease Progression, and Treatment-related Side Effects in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer from the ProtecT Randomised Controlled Trial According to Treatment Received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar 1;77(3):320–30.
dc.relation.referencesLane JA, Donovan JL, Young GJ, Davis M, Walsh EI, Avery KNL, et al. Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study). BJU Int. 2022 Sep 1;130(3):370–80.
dc.relation.referencesIlie G, Rendon R, Mason R, MacDonald C, Kucharczyk MJ, Patil N, et al. A Comprehensive 6-mo Prostate Cancer Patient Empowerment Program Decreases Psychological Distress Among Men Undergoing Curative Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2023 Jun 1;83(6):561–70.
dc.relation.referencesWortel RC, Oomen-de Hoop E, Heemsbergen WD, Pos FJ, Incrocci L. Moderate Hypofractionation in Intermediate- and High-Risk, Localized Prostate Cancer: Health-Related Quality of Life From the Randomized, Phase 3 HYPRO Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Mar 15;103(4):823–33.
dc.relation.referencesKatz A. Quality of life for men with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2007;30(4):302–8.
dc.relation.referencesCoulter A, Parsons S, Askham J. Where are the patients in decision-making about their own care? [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Enfermedades no transmisibles [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology. Estreñimiento. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Cancer.Net. Available from: https://www.cancer.net/es/asimilación-con-cáncer/efectos-físicos-emocionales-y-sociales-del-cáncer/manejo-de-los-efectos-secundarios-físicos/estreñimiento
dc.relation.referencesHsiao CP, Moore IM (Ki), Insel KC, Merkle CJ. Vol. 23, Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2014. p. 440–9 Symptom self-management strategies in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer.
dc.relation.referencesVan Vu D, Molassiotis A, Ching SSY, Le TT. Effects of Qigong on symptom management in cancer patients: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017;29(2017):111–21.
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ. Enhancing self-efficacy for optimized patient outcomes through the theory of symptom self-management. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(1).
dc.relation.referencesFu MR, LeMone P, McDaniel RW. An integrated approach to an analysis of symptom management in patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31(1):65–70.
dc.relation.referencesWatson E, Rose P, Frith E, Hamdy F, Neal D, Kastner C, et al. PROSPECTIV - A pilot trial of a nurse-led psychoeducational intervention delivered in primary care to prostate cancer survivors: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):1–7.
dc.relation.referencesCockle-Hearne J, Barnett D, Hicks J, Simpson M, White I, Faithfull S. A web-based intervention to reduce distress after prostate cancer treatment: Development and feasibility of the getting down to coping program in two different clinical settings. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4).
dc.relation.referencesGalvão DA, Newton RU, Girgis A, Lepore SJ, Gardiner RA, Taaffe DR, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a peer led multimodal intervention for men with prostate cancer to increase exercise participation. Psychooncology. 2018;27(1):199–207.
dc.relation.referencesAllen C, Vassilev I, Kennedy A, Rogers A. Long-term condition self-management support in online communities: A meta-synthesis of qualitative papers. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(3):1–17.
dc.relation.referencesRincon E, Monteiro-Guerra F, Rivera-Romero O, Dorronzoro-Zubiete E, Sanchez-Bocanegra CL, Gabarron E. Mobile Phone Apps for Quality of Life and Well-Being Assessment in Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(12):e187.
dc.relation.referencesFaithfull S, Cockle-Hearne J, Khoo V. Self-management after prostate cancer treatment: Evaluating the feasibility of providing a cognitive and behavioural programme for lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int. 2011;107(5):783–90.
dc.relation.referencesMccaughan E, Prue G, Mcsorley O, Northouse L, Schafenacker A, Parahoo K. A randomized controlled trial of a self-management psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: A study protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(11):2572–83.
dc.relation.referencesCockle-Hearne J, Faithfull S. Self-management for men surviving prostate cancer: A review of behavioural and psychosocial interventions to understand what strategies can work, for whom and in what circumstances. Psychooncology. 2010;19(9):909–22.
dc.relation.referencesBana M, Ribi K, Kropf-Staub S, Zürcher-Florin S, Näf E, Manser T, et al. Implementation of the Symptom Navi © Programme for cancer patients in the Swiss outpatient setting: A study protocol for a cluster randomised pilot study (Symptom Navi© Pilot Study). BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):1–11.
dc.relation.referencesPaterson C, Kata SG, Nandwani G, Das Chaudhury D, Nabi G. Unmet Supportive Care Needs of Men with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Prostate Cancer on Hormonal Treatment: A Mixed Methods Study. Cancer Nurs. 2017;40(6):497–507.
dc.relation.referencesStanciu MA, Morris C, Makin M, Watson E, Bulger J, Evans R, et al. Trial of personalised care after treatment—Prostate cancer: A randomised feasibility trial of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(2):1–11.
dc.relation.referencesWhite LL, Cohen MZ, Berger AM, Kupzyk KA, Bierman PJ. Self-efficacy for management of symptoms and symptom distress in adults with cancer: An integrative review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019;46(1):113–28.
dc.relation.referencesFaithfull S, Cockle-Hearne J, Khoo V. Self-management after prostate cancer treatment: Evaluating the feasibility of providing a cognitive and behavioural programme for lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int. 2011;107(5):783–90.
dc.relation.referencesPaterson C, Robertson A, Nabi G. Exploring prostate cancer survivors’ self-management behaviours and examining the mechanism effect that links coping and social support to health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression: A prospective longitudinal study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2015;19(2):120–8.
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, Brown JK, Von Eye A, Jones LW, Alderink G, et al. Virtual reality bringing a new reality to postthoracotomy lung cancer patients via a home-based exercise intervention targeting fatigue while undergoing adjuvant treatment. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(1):23–33.
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ. Enhancing self-efficacy for optimized patient outcomes through the theory of symptom self-management. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(1).
dc.relation.referencesWhite L, Cohen M, Berger A, Kupzyk K, Swore B, Bierman P. Perceived Self-Efficacy. A concept analysis for symptom management in patients with cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016;21(6):272–9.
dc.relation.referencesRuland CM, Andersen T, Jeneson A, Moore S, Grimsbø GH, Børøsund E, et al. Effects of an internet support system to assist cancer patients in reducing symptom distress: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(1):6–17.
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, von Eye A, Jones LW, Alderink G, Patzelt LH, et al. A rehabilitation program for lung cancer patients during postthoracotomy chemotherapy. Onco Targets Ther. 2014;7:415–23.
dc.relation.referencesCockle-Hearne J, Cooke D, Faithfull S. Developing peer support in film for cancer self-management: what do men want other men to know? Supportive Care in Cancer. 2016;24(4):1625–31.
dc.relation.referencesCoulter A, Parsons S, Askham J. Where are the patients in decision-making about their own care? Copenhagen : WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2008. p. 1–18.
dc.relation.referencesMurillo R, Wiesner C, Acosta J, Piñeros M, Pérez JJ, Orozco M. Modelo de Cuidado del Paciente con Cáncer. Bogotá, D.C.; 2015.
dc.relation.referencesBernat JK, Wittman DA, Hawley ST, Hamstra DA, Helfand AM, Haggstrom DA, et al. Symptom burden and information needs in prostate cancer survivors: a cancer survivos: a case for tailored long-term survivorship care. BJU Int. 2016;118(3):372–8.
dc.relation.referencesPaterson C, Primeau C, Nabi G. A pilot randomised controlled trial of a multimodal supportive care (ThriverCare) intervention for managing unmet supportive care needs in men with metastatic prostate cancer on hormonal treatment and their partner/caregivers. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2018;37(March):65–73.
dc.relation.referencesBrant JM, Dudley WN, Beck S, Miaskowski C. Evolution of the dynamic symptoms model. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016;43(5):651–4.
dc.relation.referencesGrady PA, Gough LL. Self-management: A comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:S430–6.
dc.relation.referencesGrady PA, Gough LL. El automanejo de las enfermedades crónicas: Un método integral de atención. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health. 2015;37(3):187–94.
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Apoyo al Automanejo. 2013; Available from: https://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8503:2013-self-management-support&Itemid=1353&lang=es%0Ahttps://cursospaises.campusvirtualsp.org/pluginfile.php/47555/mod_resource/content/1/Binder6.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCoolbrandt A, Wildiers H, Laenen A, Aertgeerts B, De Casterlé BD, Van Achterberg T, et al. A nursing intervention for reducing symptom burden during chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018;45(1):115–28.
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, Given BA, Von Eye A, Jones LW, Brown JK. Using perceived self-efficacy to improve fatigue and fatigability in postsurgical lung cancer patients: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2017;40(1):1–12.
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, Given BA, Von Eye A, Jones LW, Brown JK. Using perceived self-efficacy to improve fatigue and fatigability in postsurgical lung cancer patients: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Vol. 40, Cancer Nursing. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017. p. 1–12.
dc.relation.referencesCockle-Hearne J, Faithfull S. Self-management for men surviving prostate cancer: A review of behavioural and psychosocial interventions to understand what strategies can work, for whom and in what circumstances. Vol. 19, Psycho-Oncology. 2010. p. 909–22.
dc.relation.referencesStanciu MA, Morris C, Makin M, Watson E, Bulger J, Evans R, et al. Trial of personalised care after treatment—Prostate cancer: A randomised feasibility trial of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Mar 1;28(2).
dc.relation.referencesSidani S. An overview of health intervention research. In: Health Intervention Research: Understanding Research Design and Methods. SAGE Publication Ltd; 2015.
dc.relation.referencesUniversity of Michigan. EPIC | Urology | Michigan Medicine | University of Michigan [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 7]. Available from: https://medicine.umich.edu/dept/urology/research/epic
dc.relation.referencesJuárez F, Contreras F. Psychometric properties of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Colombian sample. Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2011;1(2):6–12.
dc.relation.referencesBallesteros M, Sánchez R, Merchán B, Varela R. Estudio de la estructura factorial de la escala de calidad de vida FACIT-P para los pacientes con cáncer de próstata. Revista Colombiana de Cancerología. 2012;16(3):162–9.
dc.relation.referencesShowalter TN, Mishra M V., Bridges JFP. Factors that influence patient preferences for prostate cancer management options: A systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jul 2;9:899–911
dc.relation.referencesReal Academia Española. Síntoma | Definición | Diccionario de la lengua española | RAE - ASALE [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 11]. Available from: https://dle.rae.es/síntoma?m=form
dc.relation.referencesRhodes VA, Watson PM. Symptom distress—The concept: Past and present. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1987;3(4):242–7.
dc.relation.referencesDodd M, Janson S, Facione N, Faucett J, Froelicher ES, Humphreys J, et al. Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(5):668–76.
dc.relation.referencesQiu C, Shao D, Yao Y, Zhao Y, Zang X. Self-management and psychological resilience moderate the relationships between symptoms and health-related quality of life among patients with hypertension in China. Quality of Life Research [Internet]. 2019;28(9):2585–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02191-z
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ, Von Eye A, Gift AG, Given BA, Given CW, Rothert M. Testing a theoretical model of perceived self-efficacy for cancer-related fatigue self-management and optimal physical functional status. Nurs Res. 2009 Jan;58(1):32–41
dc.relation.referencesNakagawa‐Kogan H, Garber A, Jarrett M, Egan KJ, Hendershot S. Self‐management of hypertension: Predictors of success in diastolic blood pressure reduction. Res Nurs Health. 1988;11(2):105–15.
dc.relation.referencesClark N, Becker M, Janz N, Lorig K, Anderson L. Self-management of chronic disease by older adults. J Aging Health. 1991;3(1):3–27.
dc.relation.referencesAlderson M, Starr L, Gow S, Moreland J. The program for rheumatic independent self-management: A pilot evaluation. Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(4):283–92.
dc.relation.referencesBarlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.
dc.relation.referencesLorig K R, Holman H R. Self Management Education: History, Definition, Outcomes and Mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine [Internet]. 2003;26(1):1–7. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/96t1713736v23t27.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMcCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, Schulman-Green D, Schilling LS, Lorig K, et al. Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(1):50–62.
dc.relation.referencesHoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, Given BA, Von Eye A, Jones LW, Brown JK. Using perceived self-efficacy to improve fatigue and fatigability in postsurgical lung cancer patients: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2017;40(1):1–12.
dc.relation.referencesBallesteros M, Sánchez R, Merchán B, Varela R. Estudio de la estructura factorial de la escala de calidad de vida FACIT-P para los pacientes con cáncer de próstata. Revista Colombiana de Cancerología. 2012;16(3):162–9.
dc.relation.referencesAllen C, Vassilev I, Kennedy A, Rogers A. Long-term condition self-management support in online communities: A meta-synthesis of qualitative papers. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(3):1–17.
dc.relation.referencesMosher CE, Winger JG, Hanna N, Jalal SI, Einhorn LH, Birdas TJ, et al. Randomized Pilot Trial of a Telephone Symptom Management Intervention for Symptomatic Lung Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;52(4):469–82.
dc.relation.referencesZhang M, Chan SW chi, You L, Wen Y, Peng L, Liu W, et al. The effectiveness of a self-efficacy-enhancing intervention for Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow up. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(8):1083–92.
dc.relation.referencesRuland CM, Andersen T, Jeneson A, Moore S, Grimsbø GH, Børøsund E, et al. Effects of an internet support system to assist cancer patients in reducing symptom distress: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(1):6–17.
dc.relation.referencesOakley C, Johnson J, Ream E. Developing an intervention for cancer patients prescribed oral chemotherapy: A generic patient diary. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010;19(SUPPL. 1):21–8.
dc.relation.referencesCampbell DTJ ulian GS. Disenos experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigacion social. Digestive and Liver Disease. 1967;182.
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri R, Fernández C, Baptista P. Metodología de la investigación [Internet]. 6ta edició. México: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. 1–589 p. Available from: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/#inbox/15a4cf4b02ab7f85?projector=1
dc.relation.referencesIbáñez Pinilla M. Mentefactos conceptuales como estrategia didácticopedagógica de los conceptos básicos de la teoría de muestreo aplicados en investigación en salud. Mentefactos conceptuales como estrategia didácticopedagógica de los conceptos básicos de la teoría de muestreo aplicados en investigación en salud. 2006;4(2):62–72.
dc.relation.referencesMcCaughan E, Curran C, Northouse L, Parahoo K. Evaluating a psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: Outcomes and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial. Applied Nursing Research [Internet]. 2018;40(January):143–51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.008
dc.relation.referencesTurrero A ZP. Métodos descriptivos. In: Estadística para biología y ciencias de la salud. Tercera. Madrid: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2001. p. 1.
dc.relation.referencesFACIT. Org. FACIT Measures and Languages [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 7]. Available from: https://www.facit.org/measures-scoring-downloads/fact-p-scoring-downloads
dc.relation.referencesSidani S, Braden C. Design, Evaluation, and Translation of Nursing Interventions. 2013. 1–304 p.
dc.relation.referencesAli Mansournia M, Higgins J, Sterne J, Hernán M. Biases in randomized trials: a conversation between trialists and epidemiologists. Epidemiology. 2017;28(1):54–9.
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri R, Fernández C, Baptista P. Metodología de la investigación. 6ta edició. México: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. 1–589 p.
dc.relation.referencesMcCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Vol. 67, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Elsevier USA; 2014. p. 267–77.
dc.relation.referencesManterola C, Otzen T. Los Sesgos en Investigación Clínica Bias in Clinical Research. Vol. 33, Int. J. Morphol. 2015.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud. Resolución Número 8430 de 1993. 8430 Colombia; 1993 p. 471.
dc.relation.referencesConsejo de Organizaciones Internacionales de las Ciencias Médicas (CIOMS) en colaboración con la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Pautas éticas internacionales para la investigación relacionada con la salud con seres humanos, [Internet]. Pautas éticas internacionales para la investigación biomédica en seres humanos. 2016. 136 p. Available from: www.paho.org
dc.relation.referencesOrgano Oficial de difusión y Comunicación Cíentifica del Colegio Médico de Honduras. Principios de la ética de la investigación y su aplicación. Rev Med Hondur [Internet]. 2012;80(2):75–6. Available from: http://www.bvs.hn/RMH/pdf/2012/pdf/Vol80-2-2012.pdf
dc.relation.referencesFaithfull S, Cockle-Hearne J, Khoo V. Self-management after prostate cancer treatment: Evaluating the feasibility of providing a cognitive and behavioural programme for lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int. 2011 Mar;107(5):783–90.
dc.relation.referencesMosher CE, Winger JG, Hanna N, Jalal SI, Einhorn LH, Birdas TJ, et al. Randomized Pilot Trial of a Telephone Symptom Management Intervention for Symptomatic Lung Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage [Internet]. 2016;52(4):469–82. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.006
dc.relation.referencesZeng Y, Zhang JE, Cheng ASK, Cheng H, Wefel JS. Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Virtual Reality–Based Interventions in Cancer-Related Symptom Management. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019;18.
dc.relation.referencesOakley C, Johnson J, Ream E. Developing an intervention for cancer patients prescribed oral chemotherapy: A generic patient diary. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010;19(SUPPL. 1):21–8.
dc.relation.referencesFernández Sánchez H, Guzmán Facundo F, Herrera Medina D, Sidani S. Importancia del estudio piloto en un proyecto de intervención. Index de Enfermería. 2020;1–5.
dc.relation.referencesSekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: An overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1).
dc.relation.referencesReb A, Ruel N, Fakih M, Lai L, Salgia R, Ferrell B, et al. Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention. In: European Journal of Oncology Nursing. Churchill Livingstone; 2017. p. 125–34.
dc.relation.referencesPedrosa I, Suárez-Álvarez J, García-Cueto E. Evidencias sobre la Validez de Contenido: Avances Teóricos y Métodos para su Estimación [Content Validity Evidences: Theoretical Advances and Estimation Methods]. Acción Psicológica. 2014 Jun 6;10(2):3.
dc.relation.referencesCuenta de Alto Costo. Una mirada al cáncer de próstata en Colombia - Cuenta de Alto Costo [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Oct 23]. Available from: https://cuentadealtocosto.org/cancer/una-mirada-al-cancer-de-prostata-en-colombia/
dc.relation.referencesCáncer. Net. Cáncer de próstata: Estadísticas | Cancer.Net [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 23]. Available from: https://www.cancer.net/es/tipos-de-c%C3%A1ncer/c%C3%A1ncer-de-pr%C3%B3stata/estad%C3%ADsticas
dc.relation.referencesMoraes-Araújo MS, Sardinha AH de L, Neto JA de F, da Silva EL, Holanda-Lopes ML. Sociodemographic and clinical characterization of men with prostate cancer. Revista de Salud Publica. 2019;21(3):1–6.
dc.relation.referencesWatson EK, Shinkins B, Matheson L, Burns RM, Frith E, Neal D, et al. Supporting prostate cancer survivors in primary care: Findings from a pilot trial of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention (PROSPECTIV). European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2018 Feb 1;32:73–81.
dc.relation.referencesTagai EK, Miller SM, Hudson S V., Diefenbach MA, Handorf E, Bator A, et al. Improved cancer coping from a web-based intervention for prostate cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2021 Sep 1;30(9):1466–75.
dc.relation.referencesTraeger L, Penedo FJ, Benedict C, Dahn JR, Lechner SC, Schneiderman N, et al. Identifying how and for whom cognitive-behavioral stress management improves emotional well-being among recent prostate cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):250–9.
dc.relation.referencesFaithfull S, Cockle-Hearne J, Lemanska A, Otter S, Skene SS. Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the symptom management after radiotherapy (SMaRT) group intervention to ameliorate lower urinary tract symptoms in men treated for prostate cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2022 Apr 1;30(4):3165–76.
dc.relation.referencesYang R, Lu Z, Gu X, Dai B. The Effect of an Information Support Program on Self-Efficacy of Prostate Cancer Patients during Hormonal Therapy. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Nov 1;8(6):639–52.
dc.relation.referencesLambert SD, Duncan LR, Culos-Reed SN, Hallward L, Higano CS, Loban E, et al. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Clinical Significance of a Dyadic, Web-Based, Psychosocial and Physical Activity Self-Management Program (TEMPO) Tailored to the Needs of Men with Prostate Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Multi-Center Randomized Pilot Trial. Current Oncology. 2022 Feb 1;29(2):785–804.
dc.relation.referencesCraike MJ, Gaskin CJ, Mohebbi M, Courneya KS, Livingston PM. Mechanisms of physical activity behavior change for prostate cancer survivors: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2018 Aug 16;52(9):798–808.
dc.relation.referencesGalvão DA, Newton RU, Girgis A, Lepore SJ, Stiller A, Mihalopoulos C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a peer led multimodal intervention for men with prostate cancer to increase exercise participation. Psychooncology. 2018 Jan 1;27(1):199–207.
dc.relation.referencesLepore SJ, Eton DT, Helgeson VS, Schulz R. Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychology. 2003 Sep;22(5):443–52.
dc.relation.referencesPenedo FJ, Antoni MH, Schneiderman N. Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Management for Prostate Cancer Recovery Facilitator Guide [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. (Treatments That Work). Available from: https://login.ezproxy.javeriana.edu.co/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=234722&lang=es&site=eds-live
dc.relation.referencesda Mata LRF, Azevedo C, Bernardes MFVG, Chianca TCM, Pereira M da G, de Carvalho EC. Effectiveness of a home care teaching program for prostatectomized patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem. 2019;53.
dc.relation.referencesPenedo FJ, Fox RS, Oswald LB, Moreno PI, Boland CL, Estabrook R, et al. Technology-Based Psychosocial Intervention to Improve Quality of Life and Reduce Symptom Burden in Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Behav Med. 2020 Oct 1;27(5):490–505.
dc.relation.referencesSong L, Nielsen ME, Chen RC, Rini C, Keyserling TC, Idiagbonya E, et al. Testing the efficacy of a couple-focused, tailored eHealth intervention for symptom self-management among men with prostate cancer and their partners: the study protocol. Trials. 2022 Dec 1;23(1).
dc.relation.referencesSkolarus TA, Metreger T, Wittmann D, Hwang S, Hyungjin ;, Kim M, et al. Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial [Internet]. Vol. 37, J Clin Oncol. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.
dc.relation.referencesZhang M, Chan SW chi, You L, Wen Y, Peng L, Liu W, et al. The effectiveness of a self-efficacy-enhancing intervention for Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow up. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(8):1083–92.
dc.relation.referencesRuland CM, Andersen T, Jeneson A, Moore S, Grimsbø GH, Børøsund E, et al. Effects of an internet support system to assist cancer patients in reducing symptom distress: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2013 Jan;36(1):6–17.
dc.relation.referencesTempleton H, Coates V. Evaluation of an evidence-based education package for men with prostate cancer on hormonal manipulation therapy. Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Oct;55(1):55–61.
dc.relation.referencesChen Y, Zhang X, Hu X, Deng Y, Chen J, Li S, et al. The potential role of a self-management intervention for benign prostate hyperplasia. Urology. 2012;79(6):1385–9.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.decsNeoplasias de la Próstata/enfermería
dc.subject.decsProstatic Neoplasms/nursery
dc.subject.decsAutomanejo/estadística & datos numéricos
dc.subject.decsSelf-Management/statistics & numerical data
dc.subject.decsAtención de Enfermería/métodos
dc.subject.decsNursing Care/methods
dc.subject.proposalAutomanejo
dc.subject.proposalSignos y síntomas
dc.subject.proposalNeoplasias de la próstata
dc.subject.proposalEvaluación de eficacia-efectividad de intervenciones
dc.subject.proposalself management
dc.subject.proposalsigns and symptoms
dc.subject.proposalprostate neoplasms
dc.subject.proposalEvaluation of Efficacy-Effectiveness of Interventions
dc.title.translatedEffectiveness of the Prostactive nursing intervention for symptoms self-management in men with prostate cancer under treatment
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
oaire.fundernameMinciencias
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dc.contributor.orcidCorredor Parra LR (0000-0002-6565-086X)
dc.contributor.cvlacCorredor Parra LR (https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001459187)


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito