Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Procesamiento de eventos: estudio comparativo en adultos mayores con y sin enfermedad de Alzheimer

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorLara Díaz, María Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorBeltran Rojas, Judy Costanza
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-27T19:30:37Z
dc.date.available2024-06-27T19:30:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-27
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86316
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas
dc.description.abstractEsta tesis explora la relación entre la atención visual y el lenguaje, centrándose en el procesamiento en línea de eventos estáticos y dinámicos en adultos mayores, con y sin enfermedad de Alzheimer. La investigación involucró la participación de 48 personas con enfermedad Alzheimer y un grupo control, se aplicó una batería de evaluación neuropsicológica completa, se realizaron dos experimentos para explorar las producciones orales, uno con eventos estáticos y otro con eventos dinámicos y se capturaron métricas de fijación ocular. La metodología aplicada incorporó tecnología de seguimiento ocular mediante EyeTracking. Los resultados revelaron la importancia de los eventos dinámicos como herramientas efectivas en la evaluación e intervención para individuos con enfermedad de Alzheimer, el promedio de los aciertos en nombrar eventos estáticos en el grupo con EA fue de 7,39, mientras que el de eventos dinámicos fue de 10,64. Se establecieron conexiones significativas entre aspectos lingüísticos, medidas neuropsicológicas y la orientación atencional, especificando la complejidad de la relación entre estos elementos en el contexto de la enfermedad, es así como en eventos estáticos la cantidad de verbos producidos por el grupo EA fue en promedio fue de 9,1 en eventos estáticos 12,04, mientras que en el grupo control este promedio fue en estáticos 18,3, en dinámicos 20,64. La conclusión central de esta investigación resalta que el procesamiento de eventos es una herramienta en la evaluación e intervención de personas con enfermedad de Alzheimer, ampliando la comprensión de la enfermedad tanto en términos lingüísticos como atencionales. Adicionalmente, se subraya la utilidad de la tecnología de seguimiento ocular on-line para el diseño de evaluaciones e intervenciones más precisas en beneficio de aquellos afectados por la enfermedad. Este enfoque innovador proporciona una perspectiva integral que puede transformar la forma en que abordamos y comprendemos la enfermedad de Alzheimer. (Texto tomado de la fuente).
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores the relationship between visual attention and language, focusing on the online processing of static and dynamic events in older adults, with and without Alzheimer's disease. The research involved 48 individuals with Alzheimer's disease and a control group, who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery. Two experiments were conducted to explore oral productions, one with static events and another with dynamic events, and eye fixation metrics were captured. The methodology employed incorporated eye-tracking technology. The results revealed the importance of dynamic events as effective tools in the assessment and intervention for individuals with Alzheimer's disease. The average number of correct responses in naming static events in the AD group was 7.39, while for dynamic events it was 10.64. Significant connections were established between linguistic aspects, neuropsychological measures, and attentional orientation, specifying the complexity of the relationship between these elements in the context of the disease. For static events, the average number of verbs produced by the AD group was 9.1, compared to 12.04 for controls; for dynamic events, these averages were 18.3 for controls and 20.64 for AD group. The central conclusion of this research highlights that event processing is a tool in the assessment and intervention of people with Alzheimer's disease, expanding understanding of the disease both linguistically and attentionally. Additionally, the utility of online eye-tracking technology is underscored for the design of more precise assessments and interventions for the benefit of those affected by the disease. This innovative approach provides a comprehensive perspective that can transform how we approach and understand Alzheimer's disease.
dc.format.extent135 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psicología::152 - Percepción sensorial, movimiento, emociones, impulsos fisiológicos
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::616 - Enfermedades
dc.titleProcesamiento de eventos: estudio comparativo en adultos mayores con y sin enfermedad de Alzheimer
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Doctorado en Psicología
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Neurociencias-Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Psicología
dc.description.methodsLa presente investigación siguió un diseño trasversal de corte observacional y descriptivo en el que se comparó un grupo de 48 personas con enfermedad de Alzheimer y un grupo de controles neurotípicos. Tipo de estudio: descriptivo transversal. Tipo de muestreo: no probabilístico, por conveniencia.
dc.description.researchareaNeuropsicología clínica y cognoscitiva
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanas
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.indexedBireme
dc.relation.referencesArabpour, M., Nakhshab, M., Humphry, S., & Kazemi, Y. (2023). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts’ (SALT) transcribing method and Narrative Assessment Protocol (NAP) online coding method: are they interchangeable? Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 48(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2021.1986572
dc.relation.referencesAthanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross‐linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive science, 37(2), 286-309.
dc.relation.referencesAwh, E., Belopolsky, A. V, & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(8), 437-443.
dc.relation.referencesBaddeley, A. D., Bressi, S., Della Sala, S., Logie, R., & Spinnler, H. (1991). The decline of working memory in Alzheimer’s disease: A longitudinal study. Brain, 114(6), 2521-2542.
dc.relation.referencesBaldassano, C., Chen, J., Zadbood, A., Pillow, J. W., Hasson, U., & Norman, K. A. (2017). Discovering event structure in continuous narrative perception and memory. Neuron, 95(3), 709-721.
dc.relation.referencesBastiaanse, R., & Van Zonneveld, R. (2004). Broca’s aphasia, verbs and the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 198-202.
dc.relation.referencesBastin, C., Delhaye, E., Moulin, C., & Barbeau, E. J. (2019). Novelty processing and memory impairment in Alzheimer’s disease: A review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 100, 237-249.
dc.relation.referencesBaudouin, A., Isingrini, M., & Vanneste, S. (2019). Executive functioning and processing speed in age-related differences in time estimation: A comparison of young, old, and very old adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 26(2), 264-281.
dc.relation.referencesBaumann, O., & Mattingley, J. B. (2016). Functional organization of the parahippocampal cortex: dissociable roles for context representations and the perception of visual scenes. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(8), 2536-2542.
dc.relation.referencesBeal, D. J., & Weiss, H. M. (2012). The episodic structure of life at work. En A day in the life of a happy worker (pp. 8-24). Psychology Press.
dc.relation.referencesBeber, B. C., da Cruz, A. N., & Chaves, M. L. (2015). A behavioral study of the nature of verb production deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 149, 128-134.
dc.relation.referencesBécu, M., Sheynikhovich, D., Tatur, G., Agathos, C. P., Bologna, L. L., Sahel, J.-A., & Arleo, A. (2020). Age-related preference for geometric spatial cues during real-world navigation. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 88-99.
dc.relation.referencesBell, R., & Buchner, A. (2007). Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults. Memory & cognition, 35(2), 352-364.
dc.relation.referencesBeltrami, D., Gagliardi, G., Rossini Favretti, R., Ghidoni, E., Tamburini, F., & Calzà, L. (2018). Speech analysis by natural language processing techniques: a possible tool for very early detection of cognitive decline? Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 10, 369.
dc.relation.referencesBenton, A. L. (1967). Problems of test construction in the field of aphasia. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior.
dc.relation.referencesBerggren, R., Nilsson, J., Brehmer, Y., Schmiedek, F., & Lövdén, M. (2020). Foreign language learning in older age does not improve memory or intelligence: Evidence from a randomized controlled study. Psychology and Aging, 35(2), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000439
dc.relation.referencesBerlingeri, M., Crepaldi, D., Roberti, R., Scialfa, G., Luzzatti, C., & Paulesu, E. (2008). Nouns and verbs in the brain: Grammatical class and task specific effects as revealed by fMRI. Cognitive neuropsychology, 25(4), 528-558.
dc.relation.referencesBezdek, M. A., Nguyen, T. T., Hall, C. S., Braver, T. S., Bobick, A. F., & Zacks, J. M. (2023). The multi-angle extended three-dimensional activities (META) stimulus set: A tool for studying event cognition. Behavior Research Methods, 55(7), 3629-3644.
dc.relation.referencesBisley, J. W. (2011). The neural basis of visual attention. The Journal of physiology, 589(1), 49-57.
dc.relation.referencesBlankestijn-Wilmsen, J., Damen, I., Voorbraak-Timmerman, V., Hurkmans, J., Brouwer de Koning, J., Pross, A., & Jonkers, R. (2017). The effect of static versus dynamic depictions of actions in verb and sentence production in aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(10), 1166-1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1258537
dc.relation.referencesBocanegra, Y., García, A. M., Lopera, F., Pineda, D., Baena, A., Ospina, P., Alzate, D., Buriticá, O., Moreno, L., & Ibáñez, A. (2017). Unspeakable motion: Selective action-verb impairments in Parkinson’s disease patients without mild cognitive impairment. Brain and language, 168, 37-46.
dc.relation.referencesBogard, S. (2020). Finite vs infinitive inflexion or indicative vs subjunctive mood. Which establishes the crucial distinction in spanish complement clauses? Nueva revista de filología hispánica, 68(2), 551-570.
dc.relation.referencesBortolon, C., Capdevielle, D., Salesse, R. N., & Raffard, S. (2016). Self-face recognition in schizophrenia: an eye-tracking study. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 10, 3.
dc.relation.referencesBoucart, M., Bubbico, G., Szaffarczyk, S., & Pasquier, F. (2014). Animal spotting in Alzheimer’s disease: an eye tracking study of object categorization. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 39(1), 181-189.
dc.relation.referencesBowerman, M. (2018). Verb Learning and Argument Structure. En Ten Lectures on Language, Cognition, and Language Acquisition (pp. 140-163). Brill.
dc.relation.referencesBowerman, M., & Levinson, S. C. (2001). Language acquisition and conceptual development (Número 3). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBrandão, L., Parente, M. A., & Peña-Casanova, J. (2008). Turnos e atos de fala do interlocutor de pessoas com doença de Alzheimer. ReVEL, 6(11), 1-32.
dc.relation.referencesBrennan, A. A., Bruderer, A. J., Liu-Ambrose, T., Handy, T. C., & Enns, J. T. (2017). Lifespan changes in attention revisited: Everyday visual search. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 71(2), 160.
dc.relation.referencesBruckert, A., Christie, M., & Le Meur, O. (2023). Where to look at the movies: Analyzing visual attention to understand movie editing. Behavior Research Methods, 55(6), 2940-2959.
dc.relation.referencesBunger, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Event structure influences language production: Evidence from structural priming in motion event description. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 299-323.
dc.relation.referencesCaballero, R., & Paradis, C. (2018). Verbs in speech framing expressions: Comparing English and Spanish1. Journal of Linguistics, 54(1), 45-84.
dc.relation.referencesCarone, D. A. (2007). E. Strauss, EMS Sherman, & O. Spreen, A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary: A Review of:“, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.” Taylor & Francis.
dc.relation.referencesCastellanos, E., Vega, I., & Cristancho Fajardo, C. (2022). Envejecimiento y la transición de la estructura poblacional por edades en Colombia. Tendencias, 23(1), 29-57.
dc.relation.referencesCiurea, A. V, Mohan, A. G., Covache-Busuioc, R.-A., Costin, H.-P., Glavan, L.-A., Corlatescu, A.-D., & Saceleanu, V. M. (2023). Unraveling Molecular and Genetic Insights into Neurodegenerative Diseases: Advances in Understanding Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s Diseases and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. En International Journal of Molecular Sciences (Vol. 24, Número 13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310809
dc.relation.referencesConroy, P., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Errorless and errorful therapy for verb and noun naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1311-1337.
dc.relation.referencesCorbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature reviews neuroscience, 3(3), 201-215.
dc.relation.referencesCoughlan, G., Laczó, J., Hort, J., Minihane, A.-M., & Hornberger, M. (2018). Spatial navigation deficits—overlooked cognitive marker for preclinical Alzheimer disease? Nature Reviews Neurology, 14(8), 496-506.
dc.relation.referencesCoull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(18), 7426-7435.
dc.relation.referencesCrawford, T. J., Devereaux, A., Higham, S., & Kelly, C. (2015). The disengagement of visual attention in Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal eye-tracking study. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 7, 118.
dc.relation.referencesCulbertson, W. C., & Zillmer, E. A. (1998). The Tower of LondonDX: A standardized approach to assessing executive functioning in children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13(3), 285-301.
dc.relation.referencesDainton, B. (2002). Stream of consciousness: Unity and continuity in conscious experience. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesDavis, R., & Sikorskii, A. (2020). Eye tracking analysis of visual cues during wayfinding in early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 49(1), 91-97.
dc.relation.referencesDe Aguiar, V., Paolazzi, C. L., & Miceli, G. (2015). tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: the role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics. Cortex, 63, 296-316.
dc.relation.referencesde Almeida, R. G., Mobayyen, F., Antal, C., Kehayia, E., Nair, V. P., & Schwartz, G. (2021). Category-specific verb-semantic deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from static and dynamic action naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 38(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2020.1858772
dc.relation.referencesDe Lillo, M., Foley, R., Fysh, M. C., Stimson, A., Bradford, E. E. F., Woodrow-Hill, C., & Ferguson, H. J. (2021). Tracking developmental differences in real-world social attention across adolescence, young adulthood and older adulthood. Nature human behaviour, 5(10), 1381-1390.
dc.relation.referencesDijkstra, K., Bourgeois, M. S., Allen, R. S., & Burgio, L. D. (2004). Conversational coherence: Discourse analysis of older adults with and without dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(4), 263-283.
dc.relation.referencesDruks, J., Masterson, J., Kopelman, M., Clare, L., Rose, A., & Rai, G. (2006). Is action naming better preserved (than object naming) in Alzheimer’s disease and why should we ask? Brain and Language, 98(3), 332-340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.003
dc.relation.referencesDruks, J., & Shallice, T. (2000). Selective preservation of naming from description and the “restricted preverbal message”. Brain and Language, 72(2), 100-128.
dc.relation.referencesDuarte Pedroza, L., Espitia, A., & Montañés, P. (2016). Aportes y limitaciones del Boston Naming Test: evidencia a partir de controles colombianos. Acta Neurológica Colombiana, 32(4), 290-296.
dc.relation.referencesEpstein, R. A., & Julian, J. B. (2013). Scene areas in humans and macaques. Neuron, 79(4), 615-617.
dc.relation.referencesErel, H., & Levy, D. A. (2016). Orienting of visual attention in aging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 69, 357-380.
dc.relation.referencesErel, H., Zivony, A., & Levy, D. A. (2020). Cognitive processes in aging effects on attentional alerting. Neurobiology of Aging, 92, 28-33.
dc.relation.referencesEspitia, A., & Duarte, L. (2023). Neuronorma Colombia: contributions and methodological characteristics. Neurología (English Edition).
dc.relation.referencesFairfield, B., Di Domenico, A., Serricchio, S., Borella, E., & Mammarella, N. (2017). Emotional prosody effects on verbal memory in older and younger adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24(4), 408-417.
dc.relation.referencesFan, J., Gu, X., Guise, K. G., Liu, X., Fossella, J., Wang, H., & Posner, M. I. (2009). Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional networks. Brain and cognition, 70(2), 209-220.
dc.relation.referencesFeist, M. I., & Gentner, D. (2007). Spatial language influences memory for spatial scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 283-296.
dc.relation.referencesFergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & West, T. M. (2013). Measuring lexical diversity in narrative discourse of people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), S397-408. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0083)
dc.relation.referencesFernández-Ortiz, Y. N., Fernández-Ortíz, Y. N., & Mora-Villalobos, C. A. (2020). Población Adulta Mayor en Colombia, 2020: índice de envejecimiento poblacional, relación de dependencia demográfica y afiliación en Salud.(Elder Population in Colombia, 2020: Population Aging Index, Relationship of Demographic Dependence and Membership in. Elder Population in Colombia, 1-38.
dc.relation.referencesFerreira, F., & Rehrig, G. (2019). Linearisation during language production: evidence from scene meaning and saliency maps. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1129-1139.
dc.relation.referencesFiebelkorn, I. C., & Kastner, S. (2020). Functional specialization in the attention network. Annual review of psychology, 71, 221-249.
dc.relation.referencesFiez, J. A., & Tranel, D. (1997). Standardized stimuli and procedures for investigating the retrieval of lexical and conceptual knowledge for actions. Memory & Cognition, 25(4), 543-569.
dc.relation.referencesFlecken, M., Athanasopoulos, P., Kuipers, J. R., & Thierry, G. (2015). On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition, 141, 41-51.
dc.relation.referencesFleken, M., Gerwien, J., Carroll, M., & Stutterheim, C. (2015). Analyzing gaze allocation during language planning: a cross-linguistic study on dynamic events. Language and Cognition, 7(1), 138-166. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2014.20
dc.relation.referencesFolk, C. L., & Hoyer, W. J. (1992). Aging and shifts of visual spatial attention. Psychology and aging, 7(3), 453.
dc.relation.referencesFraser, K. C., Meltzer, J. A., & Rudzicz, F. (2016). Linguistic features identify Alzheimer’s disease in narrative speech. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 49(2), 407-422.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, A. M., de Leon, J., Tee, B. L., Blasi, D. E., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2023). Speech and language markers of neurodegeneration: a call for global equity. Brain, 146(12), 4870-4879.
dc.relation.referencesGarlitch, S. M., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2021). Directing attention to event changes improves memory updating for older adults. Psychology and Aging, 36(4), 475.
dc.relation.referencesGarófalo, C. S., & Soler, J. (2023). Dimensiones del envejecimiento exitoso en personas mayores: estudio piloto.
dc.relation.referencesGauvin, H. S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020). Towards a new model of verbal monitoring. Journal of Cognition, 3(1).
dc.relation.referencesGetzmann, S., Reiser, J. E., Gajewski, P. D., Schneider, D., Karthaus, M., & Wascher, E. (2023). Cognitive aging at work and in daily life—a narrative review on challenges due to age-related changes in central cognitive functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
dc.relation.referencesGolden, C. J. (1999). Stroop: Test de colores y palabras. Tea Madrid.
dc.relation.referencesGoodglass, H. (1996). Test de vocabulario de Boston. En Test de vocabulario de Boston (p. 60).
dc.relation.referencesGraham, S., Aitken, A. A., Hebert, M., Camping, A., Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., Eustice, K., Sweet, J. D., & Ng, C. (2020). Do children with reading difficulties experience writing difficulties? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000643
dc.relation.referencesGuarino, A., Favieri, F., Boncompagni, I., Agostini, F., Cantone, M., & Casagrande, M. (2019). Executive functions in Alzheimer disease: A systematic review. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 10, 437.
dc.relation.referencesGuo, M.-H., Xu, T.-X., Liu, J.-J., Liu, Z.-N., Jiang, P.-T., Mu, T.-J., Zhang, S.-H., Martin, R. R., Cheng, M.-M., & Hu, S.-M. (2022). Attention mechanisms in computer vision: A survey. Computational visual media, 8(3), 331-368.
dc.relation.referencesHardy, J. L., Delahunt, P. B., Okajima, K., & Werner, J. S. (2005). Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. I. Detection under conditions controlling for optical factors. JOSA A, 22(1), 49-59.
dc.relation.referencesHaroon, M., Dissanayaka, N. N., Angwin, A. J., & Comans, T. (2023). How effective are pictures in eliciting information from people living with dementia? A systematic Review. Clinical Gerontologist, 46(4), 511-524.
dc.relation.referencesHart, N. J., Koronyo, Y., Black, K. L., & Koronyo-Hamaoui, M. (2016). Ocular indicators of Alzheimer’s: exploring disease in the retina. Acta neuropathologica, 132, 767-787.
dc.relation.referencesHernández, L., Montañés, P., Gamez, A., Cano, C., & Nuñez, E. (2007). Neuropsicología del envejecimiento normal. Rev Asoc Colomb Gerontol Geriatr.[Internet] 2007.[citado 12 Abr 2017]; 21 (1) (pp. 992-1004).
dc.relation.referencesHu, Y., Yang, D., Zhang, Z., Yang, T., & Peng, J. (2020). Application of artificial intelligence in dynamic image recognition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1533(3), 32093.
dc.relation.referencesHumphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition:“Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and brain sciences, 24(3), 453-476.
dc.relation.referencesIbáñez, A., Reiss, A. B., Custodio, N., & Agosta, F. (2023). Insights in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias: 2022. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15.
dc.relation.referencesIsaacs, B., & Kennie, A. T. (1973). The Set test as an aid to the detection of dementia in old people. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 123(575), 467-470.
dc.relation.referencesJackendoff, R. S. (2010). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. (No Title).
dc.relation.referencesJones, A., Silas, J., Anderson, W., & Ward, E. V. (2023). Null effects of temporal prediction on recognition memory but evidence for differential neural activity at encoding. A registered report. Cortex, 169, 130-145.
dc.relation.referencesJosephs, K. A., Whitwell, J. L., Duffy, J. R., Vanvoorst, W. A., Strand, E. A., Hu, W. T., Boeve, B. F., Graff-Radford, N. R., Parisi, J. E., & Knopman, D. S. (2008). Progressive aphasia secondary to Alzheimer disease vs FTLD pathology. Neurology, 70(1), 25-34.
dc.relation.referencesKaplan, E. (1983). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination booklet. Lea & Febiger Philadelphia, PA.
dc.relation.referencesKaplan, E. (1991). WAIS-R as a Neuropsychological Instrument (WAIS-R NI). Psychological Corporation.
dc.relation.referencesKarimi, M. N., & Asadnia, F. (2020). Applied linguistics researchers’ possible selves as motivational resources guiding their research productivity. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 25(2), 214-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1742994
dc.relation.referencesKavcic, V., Vaughn, W., & Duffy, C. J. (2011). Distinct visual motion processing impairments in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Vision research, 51(3), 386-395.
dc.relation.referencesKim, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2004). Verb deficits in Alzheimer’s disease and agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and language, 88(1), 1-20.
dc.relation.referencesKurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events. Memory & cognition, 39, 75-91.
dc.relation.referencesLane, C. A., Hardy, J., & Schott, J. M. (2018). Alzheimer’s disease. European journal of neurology, 25(1), 59-70.
dc.relation.referencesLara Díaz, M. F., Beltrán Rojas, J. C., Rodríguez Montoya, S. R., Arias Castro, D. M., & Araque Jaramillo, S. M. (2016). Análisis de la percepción de eventos estáticos y dinámicos en personas con enfermedad de Alzheimer. Universitas Psychologica, 15(SPE5), 1-13.
dc.relation.referencesLauer, T., & Võ, M. L.-H. (2022). The ingredients of scenes that affect object search and perception. Human perception of visual information: Psychological and computational perspectives, 1-32.
dc.relation.referencesLázaro, J. C. F., García, C. N. S., Ortega, J. M., Córdova, E. A. E., & González, H. J. P. (2015). Desarrollo del uso y la fluidez de verbos, su importancia para la neuropsicología. Salud mental, 38(1), 59-65.
dc.relation.referencesLenoble, Q., Corveleyn, X., Szaffarczyk, S., Pasquier, F., & Boucart, M. (2018). Attentional capture by incongruent object/background scenes in patients with Alzheimer disease. Cortex, 107, 4-12.
dc.relation.referencesLevelt, W. (1993). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT press.
dc.relation.referencesLevelt, W., & Maasen, B. (1981). Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. Crossing the boundaries in linguistics: Studies presented to Manfred Bierwisch, 221-252.
dc.relation.referencesLevin, B., Hovav, M. R., & Portner, P. (2008). Lexical conceptual structure. Lexical Structures and Adjectives, 126.
dc.relation.referencesLi, W., Wang, P., & Qiao, H. (2016). Top–down visual attention integrated particle filter for robust object tracking. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 43, 28-41.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Z., Paek, E. J., Yoon, S. O., Casenhiser, D., Zhou, W., & Zhao, X. (2022). Detecting Alzheimer’s Disease Using Natural Language Processing of Referential Communication Task Transcripts. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 86, 1385-1398. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215137
dc.relation.referencesLopis, D., Baltazar, M., Geronikola, N., Beaucousin, V., & Conty, L. (2019). Eye contact effects on social preference and face recognition in normal ageing and in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychological Research, 83(6), 1292-1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0955-6
dc.relation.referencesLoriette, C., Amengual, J. L., & Ben Hamed, S. (2022). Beyond the brain-computer interface: Decoding brain activity as a tool to understand neuronal mechanisms subtending cognition and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 811736.
dc.relation.referencesLukic, S., Borghesani, V., Weis, E., Welch, A., Bogley, R., Neuhaus, J., Deleon, J., Miller, Z. A., Kramer, J. H., & Miller, B. L. (2021). Dissociating nouns and verbs in temporal and perisylvian networks: Evidence from neurodegenerative diseases. Cortex, 142, 47-61.
dc.relation.referencesLuzzatti, C., Mauri, I., Castiglioni, S., Zuffi, M., Spartà, C., Somalvico, F., & Franceschi, M. (2020). Evaluating semantic knowledge through a semantic association task in individuals with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias®, 35, 1533317520917294.
dc.relation.referencesMac Lochlainn, C., Nic Giolla Mhichíl, M., & Beirne, E. (2020). Diversity, exclusion and inclusion: a case study of welcome online & minority language representation in MOOCs. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1823988
dc.relation.referencesMack, J. E., Mesulam, M.-M., Rogalski, E. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2019). Verb-argument integration in primary progressive aphasia: real-time argument access and selection. Neuropsychologia, 134, 107192.
dc.relation.referencesMadden, D. J., Gottlob, L. R., & Allen, P. A. (1999). Adult age differences in visual search accuracy: attentional guidance and target detectability. Psychology and aging, 14(4), 683.
dc.relation.referencesMalyutina, S., & Zelenkova, V. (2020). Verb argument structure effects in aphasia are different at single-word versus sentence level. Aphasiology, 34(4), 431-457.
dc.relation.referencesManouilidou, C., de Almeida, R. G., Schwartz, G., & Nair, N. P. V. (2009). Thematic roles in Alzheimer’s disease: Hierarchy violations in psychological predicates. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.10.002
dc.relation.referencesMansur, L. L., Carthery-Goulart, M. T., Bahia, V. S., Bak, T. H., & Nitrini, R. (2013). Semantic Memory: nouns and action verbs in cognitively unimpaired individuals and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 7, 48-54.
dc.relation.referencesMartzoukou, M., Nasios, G., Kosmidis, M. H., & Papadopoulou, D. (2022). Aging and the perception of affective and linguistic prosody. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(5), 1001-1021.
dc.relation.referencesMasterson, J., Druks, J., & Gallienne, D. (2008). Object and action picture naming in three-and five-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 35(2), 373-402.
dc.relation.referencesMaylor, E. A., Watson, D. G., & Hartley, E. L. (2011). Effects of distraction on visual enumeration in children and adults. Developmental psychology, 47(5), 1440.
dc.relation.referencesMcClelland, J. L., Mirman, D., Bolger, D. J., & Khaitan, P. (2014). Interactive activation and mutual constraint satisfaction in perception and cognition. Cognitive science, 38(6), 1139-1189.
dc.relation.referencesMcKendrick, A. M., Sampson, G. P., Walland, M. J., & Badcock, D. R. (2007). Contrast sensitivity changes due to glaucoma and normal aging: low-spatial-frequency losses in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 48(5), 2115-2122.
dc.relation.referencesMeltzer, J. A. (2020). Towards early prediction of Alzheimer’s disease through language samples. EClinicalMedicine, 29.
dc.relation.referencesMerten, N., Fischer, M. E., Tweed, T. S., Breteler, M. M. B., & Cruickshanks, K. J. (2020). Associations of hearing sensitivity, higher-order auditory processing, and cognition over time in middle-aged adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 75(3), 545-551.
dc.relation.referencesMok, R. M., Myers, N. E., Wallis, G., & Nobre, A. C. (2016). Behavioral and neural markers of flexible attention over working memory in aging. Cerebral Cortex, 26(4), 1831-1842.
dc.relation.referencesMontañés, P., Espitia, A., & Duarte, L. (2020). Neuronorma. Colombia.: Protocolo, normas, plataforma de perfiles neuropsicológicos y aplicaciones clínicas. Centro Editorial de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas de la Universidad
dc.relation.referencesMoore, T., & Zirnsak, M. (2017). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual review of psychology, 68, 47-72.
dc.relation.referencesMorello, A. N. da C., Lima, T. M., & Brandão, L. (2017). Language and communication non-pharmacological interventions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Communication intervention in Alzheimer. Dementia & neuropsychologia, 11, 227-241.
dc.relation.referencesMorton, J., & Frith, U. (2001). Why we need cognition: Cause and developmental disorder. Language, brain, and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler, 263.
dc.relation.referencesMousavi, S. Z., Mehri, A., Maroufizadeh, S., & Koochak, S. E. (2014). Comparing Verb Fluency With Verbal Fluency in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease. Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health, 1(2).
dc.relation.referencesMuiños, M., Palmero, F., & Ballesteros, S. (2016). Peripheral vision, perceptual asymmetries and visuospatial attention in young, young-old and oldest-old adults. Experimental gerontology, 75, 30-36.
dc.relation.referencesMusicco, M., Palmer, K., Salamone, G., Lupo, F., Perri, R., Mosti, S., Spalletta, G., Di Iulio, F., Pettenati, C., & Cravello, L. (2009). Predictors of progression of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease: the role of vascular and sociodemographic factors. Journal of neurology, 256, 1288-1295.
dc.relation.referencesMyachykov, A., Thompson, D., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2012). Referential and visual cues to structural choice in visually situated sentence production. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 396.
dc.relation.referencesNaber, M., Frässle, S., Rutishauser, U., & Einhäuser, W. (2013). Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes. Journal of vision, 13(2), 11.
dc.relation.referencesNasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695-699.
dc.relation.referencesNobre, A. C., & Van Ede, F. (2018). Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(1), 34-48.
dc.relation.referencesOhyama, J., & Watanabe, K. (2016). Temporal and Spatial Predictability of an Irrelevant Event Differently Affect Detection and Memory of Items in a Visual Sequence. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 65.
dc.relation.referencesOken, B. S., Salinsky, M. C., & Elsas, S. (2006). Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement. Clinical neurophysiology, 117(9), 1885-1901.
dc.relation.referencesOlk, B., & Kingstone, A. (2015). Attention and ageing: Measuring effects of involuntary and voluntary orienting in isolation and in combination. British Journal of Psychology, 106(2), 235-252.
dc.relation.referencesOrimaye, S. O., Wong, J. S. M., Golden, K. J., Wong, C. P., & Soyiri, I. N. (2017). Predicting probable Alzheimer’s disease using linguistic deficits and biomarkers. BMC bioinformatics, 18(1), 1-13.
dc.relation.referencesOstarek, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2017). Reading sky and seeing a cloud: On the relevance of events for perceptual simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 579-590. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000318
dc.relation.referencesPapafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108(1), 155-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007
dc.relation.referencesPark, D. C., & Festini, S. B. (2017). Theories of memory and aging: A look at the past and a glimpse of the future. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(1), 82-90.
dc.relation.referencesPetersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual review of neuroscience, 35, 73-89.
dc.relation.referencesPi, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Zhou, W., & Yang, J. (2023). Generative learning supports learning from video lectures: evidence from an EEG study. Instructional Science, 51(2), 231-249.
dc.relation.referencesPillon, A., & d’Honincthun, P. (2010). The organization of the conceptual system: The case of the “object versus action” dimension. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(7), 587-613.
dc.relation.referencesPino, M., Rigaud, A., de Rotrou, J., & Jouen, F. (2011). P1‐460: How older adults with Alzheimer’s disease allocate gaze during visual search. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 7, S261-S261.
dc.relation.referencesPoliakoff, E., Miles, E., Li, X., & Blanchette, I. (2007). The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch. Cognition, 102(3), 405-414.
dc.relation.referencesPosner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 32(1), 3-25.
dc.relation.referencesRadvansky, G., & Zacks, J. (2014). Event cognition. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesRamzaoui, H., Faure, S., David, R., & Spotorno, S. (2022). Top-down and bottom-up sources of eye-movement guidance during realistic scene search in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology.
dc.relation.referencesRémy, F., Saint-Aubert, L., Bacon-Macé, N., Vayssière, N., Barbeau, E., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2013). Object recognition in congruent and incongruent natural scenes: A life-span study. Vision research, 91, 36-44.
dc.relation.referencesReuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Cappell, K. A. (2008). Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current directions in psychological science, 17(3), 177-182.
dc.relation.referencesRey-Mermet, A., & Gade, M. (2018). Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 25, 1695-1716.
dc.relation.referencesRey, A. (2009). REY. Test de copia de una figura compleja. Madrid: TEA ediciones.
dc.relation.referencesRiccardi, N., Yourganov, G., Rorden, C., Fridriksson, J., & Desai, R. H. (2019). Dissociating action and abstract verb comprehension post-stroke. Cortex, 120, 131-146.
dc.relation.referencesRichmond, L. L., Gold, D. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event perception: Translations and applications. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 111-120.
dc.relation.referencesRizzo, M., Anderson, S. W., Dawson, J., & Nawrot, M. (2000). Vision and cognition in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 38(8), 1157-1169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00023-3
dc.relation.referencesRochon, E., Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000). Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: Further development and new data. Brain and language, 72(3), 193-218.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Davies, R., González-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., & Cuetos, F. (2009). Name agreement, frequency and age of acquisition, but not grammatical class, affect object and action naming in Spanish speaking participants with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.05.003
dc.relation.referencesRubin, D. C., & Umanath, S. (2015). Event memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events. Psychological review, 122(1), 1.
dc.relation.referencesSalmazo-Silva, H., Parente, M. A. de M. P., Rocha, M. S., Baradel, R. R., Cravo, A. M., Sato, J. R., Godinho, F., & Carthery-Goulart, M. T. (2017). Lexical-retrieval and semantic memory in Parkinson’s disease: The question of noun and verb dissociation. Brain and Language, 165, 10-20.
dc.relation.referencesSalvato, G., Patai, E. Z., & Nobre, A. C. (2016). Preserved memory-based orienting of attention with impaired explicit memory in healthy ageing. cortex, 74, 67-78.
dc.relation.referencesSantamaria-Garcia, H., Sainz-Ballesteros, A., Hernandez, H., Moguilner, S., Maito, M., Ochoa-Rosales, C., Corley, M., Valcour, V., Miranda, J. J., & Lawlor, B. (2023). Factors associated with healthy aging in Latin American populations. Nature Medicine, 29(9), 2248-2258.
dc.relation.referencesSantin, M., van Hout, A., & Flecken, M. (2021). Event endings in memory and language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(5), 625-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1868542
dc.relation.referencesSargent, J. Q., Zacks, J. M., Hambrick, D. Z., Zacks, R. T., Kurby, C. A., Bailey, H. R., Eisenberg, M. L., & Beck, T. M. (2013). Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory. Cognition, 129(2), 241-255.
dc.relation.referencesScheltens, P., De Strooper, B., Kivipelto, M., Holstege, H., Chételat, G., Teunissen, C. E., Cummings, J., & van der Flier, W. M. (2021). Alzheimer’s disease. The Lancet, 397(10284), 1577-1590.
dc.relation.referencesSchröder, J., & Pantel, J. (2016). Neuroimaging of hippocampal atrophy in early recognition of Alzheimer´ s disease–a critical appraisal after two decades of research. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 247, 71-78.
dc.relation.referencesSerra, M. (2013). Comunicación y lenguaje. La nueva neuropsicología cognitiva, II (Vol. 2). Edicions Universitat Barcelona.
dc.relation.referencesShafto, M. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346(6209), 583-587.
dc.relation.referencesSharma, S., Kim, H., Harris, H., Haberstroh, A., Wright, H. H., & Rothermich, K. (2021). Eye tracking measures for studying language comprehension deficits in aphasia: A systematic search and scoping review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(3), 1008-1022.
dc.relation.referencesSkordos, D., Bunger, A., Richards, C., Selimis, S., Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A. (2020). Motion verbs and memory for motion events. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(5-6), 254-270.
dc.relation.referencesSlegers, A., Filiou, R.-P., Montembeault, M., & Brambati, S. M. (2018). Connected speech features from picture description in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease, 65(2), 519-542.
dc.relation.referencesSmirnova, D., Smirnova, T., & Cumming, P. (2021). Language Impairments in Dementia: From Word-Finding Difficulties to Everyday Conversation in a Dementia-Friendly Community. Dementia Care: Issues, Responses and International Perspectives, 85-108.
dc.relation.referencesSmith, A. (1973). Symbol digit modalities test. Western psychological services Los Angeles.
dc.relation.referencesSpezzano, L. C., & Radanovic, M. (2010). Naming abilities: Differentiation between objects and verbs in aphasia. Dementia & neuropsychologia, 4, 287-292.
dc.relation.referencesStuss, D. T. (2011). Functions of the frontal lobes: relation to executive functions. Journal of the international neuropsychological Society, 17(5), 759-765.
dc.relation.referencesSuárez Rodríguez, A. (2022). The Aktionsart of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Corpus-Based Analysis.
dc.relation.referencesTalmy, L. (1976). Semantic causative types. En The grammar of causative constructions (pp. 41-116). Brill.
dc.relation.referencesTanaka, J. W., & Sung, A. (2016). The “eye avoidance” hypothesis of autism face processing. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 46, 1538-1552.
dc.relation.referencesTang, M. F., Ford, L., Arabzadeh, E., Enns, J. T., Visser, T. A. W., & Mattingley, J. B. (2020). Neural dynamics of the attentional blink revealed by encoding orientation selectivity during rapid visual presentation. Nature Communications, 11(1), 434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14107-z
dc.relation.referencesTorralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychological review, 113(4), 766.
dc.relation.referencesTraikapi, A., Kalli, I., Kyriakou, A., Stylianou, E., Symeou, R. T., Kardama, A., Christou, Y. P., Phylactou, P., & Konstantinou, N. (2023). Episodic memory effects of gamma frequency precuneus transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized multiple baseline study. Journal of neuropsychology, 17(2), 279-301.
dc.relation.referencesVanGilder, J. L., Hengge, C. R., Duff, K., & Schaefer, S. Y. (2018). Visuospatial function predicts one-week motor skill retention in cognitively intact older adults. Neuroscience letters, 664, 139-143.
dc.relation.referencesVarlokosta, S., Fragkopoulou, K., Arfani, D., & Manouilidou, C. (2023). Methodologies for assessing morphosyntactic ability in people with Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders.
dc.relation.referencesVerheij, S., Muilwijk, D., Pel, J. J. M., van der Cammen, T. J. M., Mattace-Raso, F. U. S., & van der Steen, J. (2012). Visuomotor impairment in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: changes in relative timing of eye and hand movements. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 30(1), 131-143.
dc.relation.referencesVerma, M., & Howard, R. J. (2012). Semantic memory and language dysfunction in early Alzheimer’s disease: a review. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 27(12), 1209-1217.
dc.relation.referencesViccaro, E., Sands, E., & Springer, C. (2019). Spaced Retrieval Using Static and Dynamic Images to Improve Face–Name Recognition: Alzheimer’s Dementia and Vascular Dementia. American journal of speech-language pathology, 28(3), 1184-1197.
dc.relation.referencesVigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407-426.
dc.relation.referencesVu, T. A., Fenwick, E. K., Gan, A. T. L., Man, R. E. K., Tan, B. K. J., Gupta, P., Ho, K. C., Reyes-Ortiz, C. A., Trompet, S., & Gussekloo, J. (2021). The bidirectional relationship between vision and cognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology, 128(7), 981-992.
dc.relation.referencesWang, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, J., Huang, S., Wang, J., Feng, Y., Jiang, Z., Wang, H., & Yin, S. (2022). Bottom-up and top-down attention impairment induced by long-term exposure to noise in the absence of threshold shifts. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 836683.
dc.relation.referencesWasylyshyn, C., Verhaeghen, P., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2011). Aging and task switching: a meta-analysis. Psychology and aging, 26(1), 15.
dc.relation.referencesWatzl, S. (2014). Attentional organization and the unity of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(7-8), 56-87.
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, E., McAuliffe, M., & Theys, C. (2021). Language changes in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of verb processing. Brain and Language, 223, 105041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105041
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, E. S. (2022). Influences of cognitive impairment and healthy ageing on conversational use of verbs, nouns, and pronouns.
dc.relation.referencesWittenberg, E. (2016). With light verb constructions from syntax to concepts (Vol. 7). Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
dc.relation.referencesWolf, A., Tripanpitak, K., Umeda, S., & Otake-Matsuura, M. (2023). Eye-tracking paradigms for the assessment of mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
dc.relation.referencesWolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2017). Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 58.
dc.relation.referencesZacks, J. M. (2020). Event perception and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 165-191.
dc.relation.referencesZacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Vettel, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2006). Event understanding and memory in healthy aging and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Psychology and aging, 21(3), 466.
dc.relation.referencesZacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological bulletin, 127(1), 3.
dc.relation.referencesZanto, T. P., Pan, P., Liu, H., Bollinger, J., Nobre, A. C., & Gazzaley, A. (2011). Age-related changes in orienting attention in time. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(35), 12461-12470.
dc.relation.referencesZimianiti, E., Dimitrakopoulou, M., & Tsangalidis, A. (2021). Τhematic roles in dementia: the case of psychological verbs. 12th International Conference of Experimental Linguistics (ExLing 2021), 269-272.
dc.relation.referencesZivony, A., Erel, H., & Levy, D. A. (2020). Predictivity and manifestation factors in aging effects on the orienting of spatial attention. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(9), 1863-1872.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.decsEnfermedad de Alzheimer
dc.subject.decsAlzheimer Disease
dc.subject.decsAnciano
dc.subject.decsAged
dc.subject.decsTecnología de Seguimiento Ocular
dc.subject.decsEye-Tracking Technology
dc.subject.proposalProcesamiento de eventos
dc.subject.proposalEnvejecimiento
dc.subject.proposalEnfermedad de Alzheimer
dc.subject.proposalLenguaje
dc.subject.proposalAtención visual
dc.subject.proposalEvent processing
dc.subject.proposalAlzheimer's disease
dc.subject.proposalLanguage
dc.subject.proposalAttention
dc.title.translatedEvent Processing: Comparative Study in Older Adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7997-5059
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000095845
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?hl=es&user=sHml3cYAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
1018455185.2024.pdf
Tamaño:
1.391Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Psicología
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito