Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento
Influencia de la rugosidad superficial y la macrogeometría sobre la calidad del ajuste entre tornillo de fijación e implante en prótesis implanto-soportadas
dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional |
dc.contributor.advisor | Cortés Rodríguez, Carlos Julio |
dc.contributor.advisor | Sarmiento Delgado, Martha Lucía |
dc.contributor.advisor | Sarmiento |
dc.contributor.author | Roberto Vargas, Eliana Marcela |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-02T17:41:28Z |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-02T17:41:28Z |
dc.date.issued | 2023 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86342 |
dc.description | ilustraciones (principalmente a color), diagramas, fotografías |
dc.description.abstract | Grandes empresas internacionales como MIS se dedican al diseño y manufactura de componentes protésicos con procesos estandarizados y controles de calidad. En Colombia existen centros de torneado que fabrican tornillos de fijación que aseguran ajustarse adecuadamente a los implantes originales, sin embargo, no existen evaluaciones ni estándares para ser certificados como contratipos. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la calidad de ajuste de tornillos de fijación obtenidos por CAD/CAM de dos centros de torneado nacionales sobre implantes dentales y análogo originales. Para esto se hace la caracterización de 5 parámetros macrogeométricos y 12 parámetros de rugosidad con Alicona InfiniteFocus G5 para 9 tornillos de fijación, 2 implantes y un análogo, análisis de tolerancias dimensionales bajo ISO 965-1. El análisis estadístico bajo prueba T para dos muestras asumiendo varianzas desiguales (α=0.05); y finalmente un ensamble tornillo-implante para percibir el ajuste y generar la propuesta de características de manufactura para los centros de torneado CNC. El análisis de tolerancia y la prueba T indican que tornillos CT2 presentan menor compatibilidad con los tornillos MIS, excediendo el ángulo y longitud roscada de los implantes y análogo. Se observan diferencias significativas de parámetros de rugosidad de amplitud, geometría y funcionalidad de ambos CT2 y CT1 frente a originales, considerándose no aptos para usarse como contratipos. Para implantes y análogo se aceptan las características macrogeométricas gracias al fenómeno de deformación elástica, el análisis de rugosidad indica que el implante 2 presenta la superficie menos uniforme siendo considerado el más susceptible a retener fluidos. Ensamble inicial sin indicios de micromovimientos o desajustes (Texto tomado de la fuente). |
dc.description.abstract | Large international companies such as MIS are dedicated to the design and manufacture of prosthetic components with standardized processes and quality controls. In Colombia there are turning centers that manufacture fixation screws that ensure adequate adjustment to the original implants; however, there are no evaluations or standards to be certified as countertypes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the adjustment quality of fixation screws obtained by CAD/CAM from two national turning centers on original dental implants and analogues. For this purpose, the characterization of 5 macrogeometric parameters and 12 roughness parameters with Alicona InfiniteFocus G5 for 9 fixation screws, 2 implants and an analog, analysis of dimensional tolerances under ISO 965-1. Statistical analysis under T-test for two samples assuming unequal variances (α=0.05); and finally a screw-implant assembly to perceive the fit and generate the proposed manufacturing characteristics for the CNC turning centers. Tolerance analysis and T-test indicate that CT2 screws present lower compatibility with MIS screws, exceeding the angle and threaded length of implants and analog. Significant differences of amplitude roughness parameters, geometry and functionality of both CT2 and CT1 against originals are observed, considering them not suitable to be used as countertypes. For implants and analogues the macrogeometric characteristics are accepted thanks to the elastic deformation phenomenon, the roughness analysis indicates that implant 2 presents the less uniform surface being considered the most susceptible to retain fluids. Initial assembly without signs of micromovement or misalignment (Texto tomado de la fuente). |
dc.format.extent | xvi, 20-123 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf |
dc.language.iso | spa |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.subject.ddc | 620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería |
dc.subject.ddc | 680 - Manufactura para usos específicos::681 - Instrumentos de precisión y otros dispositivos |
dc.subject.ddc | 610 - Medicina y salud::617 - Cirugía, medicina regional, odontología, oftalmología, otología, audiología |
dc.title | Influencia de la rugosidad superficial y la macrogeometría sobre la calidad del ajuste entre tornillo de fijación e implante en prótesis implanto-soportadas |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Materiales y Procesos |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | Grupo de Investigación en Biomecánica |
dc.description.degreelevel | Maestría |
dc.description.degreename | Magíster en Ingeniería - Materiales y Procesos |
dc.description.researcharea | Implantes dentales |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingeniería |
dc.publisher.place | Bogotá, Colombia |
dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
dc.relation.references | F. Rupp, L. Liang, J. Geis-Gerstorfer, L. Scheideler, and F. Hüttig, “Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review,” Dental Materials, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 40–57, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007 |
dc.relation.references | M. J. Han, H. C. Choe, and C. H. Chung, “Surface characteristics of clinically used dental Implant screws,” Metals and Materials International, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 449–456, 2005, doi: 10.1007/BF03027494. |
dc.relation.references | A. Curiqueo, C. Salamanca, E. Borie, P. Navarro, and R. Fuentes, “Evaluación de la fuerza masticatoria máxima funcional en adultos jóvenes chilenos,” International Journal of Odontostomatology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 443–447, 2015, doi: 10.4067/s0718-381x2015000300014. |
dc.relation.references | C. M. L. Bollen, W. Papaioanno, J. Van Eldere, E. Schepers, M. Quirynen, and D. Van Steenberghe, “The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis,” Clin Oral Implants Res, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 201–211, 1996, doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x. |
dc.relation.references | T. Barbin et al., “3D metal printing in dentistry: An in vitro biomechanical comparative study of two additive manufacturing technologies for full-arch implant-supported prostheses,” J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, vol. 108, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103821. |
dc.relation.references | M. Ferreira Kunrath, “Customized dental implants: Manufacturing processes, topography, osseointegration and future perspectives of 3D fabricated implants,” Bioprinting, vol. 20, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00107. |
dc.relation.references | V. Dobrovolski, K. Zablonski, S. Mak, A. Radtckik, and L. Erlikh, Elementos de máquinas. 1991. |
dc.relation.references | R. Hernández and F. Fernández, “Elementos de Máquinas: Cálculo de uniones roscadas,” Villa Clara, 2012. |
dc.relation.references | “Tolerancias dimensionales.” Accessed: Jan. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sites.google.com/site/brazoromer/home/proyecto/tolerancias-dimensionales?tmpl=%2Fsystem%2Fapp%2Ftemplates%2Fprint%2F&showPrintDialog=1 |
dc.relation.references | I.A.Rem., “ Elementos de una rosca,” https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Elementos_de_Rosca.png. |
dc.relation.references | Tivoly, “Catalogue tivoly threading,” 2015. Accessed: Jan. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://es.calameo.com/tivoly/read/0042243878efc86fb9b6d |
dc.relation.references | R. G. Budynas and J. K. Nisbett, Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design, 10th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2015. |
dc.relation.references | R. L. M. Mott, Diseño de Elementos de Máquinas -, 4th ed. México: Pearson Educación, 2006. |
dc.relation.references | B. Al-Nawas et al., “Validation of three-dimensional surface characterising methods: Scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy,” Scanning, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 227–231, 2001, doi: 10.1002/sca.4950230401. |
dc.relation.references | C. N. Elias, “Factors affecting the success of dental implants, implant dentistry - a rapidly evolving practice,” Implant Dentistry - A Rapidly Evolving Practice, pp. 319–365, 2011. |
dc.relation.references | Clínica Dental Verona, “¿Qué es un implante dental?” [Online]. Available: https://clinicaverona.com/implantes-dentales |
dc.relation.references | Dental Solutions Cumdente, “Neuheiten - Cumdente.” Accessed: Jun. 14, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cumdente.de/neuheiten.html |
dc.relation.references | P. P. Binon, “Implants and Components: Entering the new millennium,” 2000. |
dc.relation.references | B. Kim, I. Yeo, J. Lee, S. Kim, S. Heo, and J. Koak, “Effect of screw length on fracture load and abutment strain in dental implants with external abutment connections,” Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol. 27, pp. 820–823, 2012. |
dc.relation.references | J. H. Lee and H. S. Cha, “Screw loosening and changes in removal torque relative to abutment screw length in a dental implant with external abutment connection after oblique cyclic loading,” Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 415–421, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.6.415. |
dc.relation.references | Implantes dentales Pifer, “Implantes Dentales de Titanio, Biocompatibilidad y Anodizado,” https://www.implantesdentalespifer.es/implantes-dentales-de-titanio-biocompatibilidad-y-anodizado/. |
dc.relation.references | Y.-T. Hsu, J.-H. Fu, K. Al-Hezaimi, and H.-L. Wang, “Biomechanical implant treatment complications: A systematic review of clinical studies of implants with at least 1 year of functional loading,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants ·, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 894–904, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230590510 |
dc.relation.references | Ş. Gheorghe, I. A. Popovici, F. Popovici, and S. M. Croitoru, “Implant, instrumentary kit for inserting the same and endosseous implant made by using the same,” 121362, Apr. 30, 2007 |
dc.relation.references | M. Rismanchian, F. Bajoghli, Z. Mostajeran, A. Fazel, and ; P Sadr Eshkevari, “Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients,” Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 196–200, 2009, [Online]. Available: http://meridian.allenpress.com/joi/article-pdf/35/4/196/2036038/1548-1336-35_4_196.pdf |
dc.relation.references | S. M. Croitoru and I. A. Popovici, “R&D on dental implants breakage,” Appl Surf Sci, vol. 417, pp. 262–268, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.110. |
dc.relation.references | P. Binon and M. McHugh, “The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability,” Int J Prosthodont, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 511–9, 1996. |
dc.relation.references | M. Hernandez-Rodriguez, G. Contreras-Hernandez, A. Juarez-Hernandez, B. Beltran-Ramirez, and E. Garcia-Sanchez, “Failure analysis in a dental implant,” Eng Fail Anal, vol. 57, pp. 236–242, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.07.035. |
dc.relation.references | C. Wadhwani, L. Canullo, and T. Schoenbaum, “Delivery of the definitive abutment/prosthesis: biologics, aesthetics, and mechanical considerations,” Implants in the Aesthetic Zone, pp. 279–293, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-72601-4_14. |
dc.relation.references | L. Jimenez Balboa, Prontuario de ajustes y tolerancias. Mexico: Alfaomega - Marcombo, 1996. |
dc.relation.references | International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 965-1:2013 general purpose metric screw threads — Tolerances — Part 1: Principles and basic data.” Suiza, 2013. |
dc.relation.references | Evident, “Medición de la rugosidad superficial: Parámetros,” https://www.olympus-ims.com/es/metrology/surface-roughness-measurement-portal/parameters/#!cms[focus]=023. |
dc.relation.references | S. Poveda Martínez, “Lecturas complementarias:Tolerancias de fabricación.” Visual Graphics Group. |
dc.relation.references | J. P. B. van Dam, S. Abrahami, A. Yilmaz, Y. Gonzalez-Garcia, H. Terryn, and J. Mol, “Effect of surface roughness and chemistry on the adhesion and durability of a steel-epoxy adhesive interface,” Int J Adhes Adhes, vol. 96, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102450. |
dc.relation.references | L. Tonietto, L. Gonzaga, M. Roberto Veronez, C. de Souza Kazmierczak, D. C. Metz Arnold, and C. A. da Costa, “New method for evaluating surface roughness parameters acquired by laser scanning,” Sci Rep, vol. 9, pp. 1–16, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51545-7. |
dc.relation.references | C. J. Cortés, I. Z. Araque, F. A. Herreño, and N. Bahamón, Medición de rugosidad 3D mediante métodos ópticos: Manual metodológico de medición, 1st ed. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2019. |
dc.relation.references | M. Jaarda, M. Razzoog, and D. Gratton, “Geometric comparison of five interchangeable implant prosthetic retaining screws,” J Prosthet Dent, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 373–379, 1995. |
dc.relation.references | J. Estupiñan Ayala, A. Gómez, and Á. Pulido, “Evaluación de la tolerancia de tornillos de fijación y abutments de conexión hexagonal interna pasiva prefabricados y personalizados,” Posgrado/línea docente, Universidad del Bosque, Bogotá, 2018. |
dc.relation.references | H. Zipprich, F. Rathe, S. Pinz, L. Schlotmann, H.-C. Lauer, and C. Ratka, “Effects of screw configuration on the preload force of implant-abutment screws,” Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. e25–e32, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.11607/jomi.5837. |
dc.relation.references | F. J. Gil, M. Herrero-Climent, P. Lázaro, and J. V. Rios, “Implant–abutment connections: influence of the design on the microgap and their fatigue and fracture behavior of dental implants,” J Mater Sci Mater Med, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1825–1830, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5211-7. |
dc.relation.references | E. Atzeni et al., “Tolerance analysis for cast vs machined dental implants,” in Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V., 2015, pp. 263–268. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.06.047. |
dc.relation.references | A. Khraisat, O. Abu-Hammad, A. M. Al-Kayed, and N. Dar-Odeh, “Stability of the implant/abutment joint in a single-tooth external-hexagon implant system: Clinical and mechanical review,” Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 222–229, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00038.x. |
dc.relation.references | A. Gárate-Arias, V. Ccahuana Vásquez, and C. Chang, “Condiciones favorables para el desempeño de prótesis sobre implantes utilizando conexiones externas,” Rev Estomatol Herediana, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 2012. |
dc.relation.references | Y. Al Jabbari, R. Fournelle, S. Zinelis, and A. Lacopino, “Biotribological behavior of two retrieved implant abutment screws after long-term use in vivo,” Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1474–1481, 2012. |
dc.relation.references | Alicona Imaging GmbH, “Bruker Alicona,” http://www.alicona.com. |
dc.relation.references | Alicona Imaging GmbH, “The Magazine about Alicona-metrology: Alicona Focus Variation,” Edición 4, Alemania, pp. 1–68, 2013. |
dc.relation.references | I. Z. Araque, “Metodología de micro medición de superficies: forma y rugosidad 3D con método óptico de variación focal,” Universidad Nacional de Colombia , 2018. |
dc.relation.references | J. Valentí, J. Guasch, P. Sevilla, and F. Gil, “Anodización del titanio para la mejora ante la degra-dación química de material quirúrgico,” Biomecánica, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2004 |
dc.relation.references | MIS Corporation, “An innovative implant by MIS.” Accessed: Nov. 09, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://misimplants.co.za/downloads/seven.pdf |
dc.relation.references | Alicona Imaging GmbH, “Technical Specifications InfiniteFocus G5plus.” Accessed: Oct. 22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.alicona.com/products/infinitefocus/ |
dc.relation.references | R. Alonso-Pérez, J. F. Bartolomé, A. Ferreiroa, M. P. Salido, and G. Pradíes, “Original vs. non-original abutments for screw-retained single implant crowns: An in vitro evaluation of internal fit, mechanical behaviour and screw loosening,” Clin Oral Implants Res, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1230–1238, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1111/clr.13390 |
dc.relation.references | S. Szmukler-Moncler, T. Testori, and J. P. Bernard, “Etched Implants: A comparative surface analysis of four implant systems,” J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 46–57, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.20021 |
dc.relation.references | A. Wennerberg and T. Albrektsson, “Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review,” Clinical Oral Implant Research, vol. 20, pp. 172–184, 2009 |
dc.relation.references | O. Andrukhov et al., “Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness,” Dental Materials, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1374–1384, Nov. 2016 |
dc.relation.references | V. Fröjd, V. Franke-Stenport, L. Meirelles, and A. Wennerberg, “Increased bone contact to a calcium-incorporated oxidized commercially pure titanium implant: an in-vivo study in rabbits,” International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 37, pp. 561–566, 2008 |
dc.relation.references | A. Örtorp, T. Jemt, A. Wennerberg, C. Berggren, and M. Brycke, “Screw preloads and measurements of surface roughness in screw joints: An in vitro study on implant frameworks,” Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 141–149, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00058.x. |
dc.relation.references | T. Jemt, U. Lekholm, and K. Gröndahl, “3-year follow up study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark,” Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 340–349, 1990 |
dc.relation.references | E. S. Im, J. E. Kim, J. H. Kim, and Y. B. Park, “Finite element analysis of the effect of novel lock screw system preventing abutment screw loosening,” Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 132–142, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.14368/jdras.2019.35.3.132 |
dc.relation.references | P. Binon, “Implants and components: entering the new millennium,” Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 76–94, 2000 |
dc.relation.references | A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, and J. Lindhe, “Surface topography of titanium implants,” Clinical Periodontology and clinical dentistry. Blackwell Munksgaard, a Blackwell Publishing Company, Oxford, UK, pp. 821–828, 2003 |
dc.relation.references | F. Y. Hernández, “Control de mecanizados: roscas unificadas e ISO métricas", https://inm.gov.co/web/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Trabajo-No.4.pdf |
dc.relation.references | S. Lehmann, “Alicona IF-VerificationTool, Version G2 VA2 - Calibration certificate and Technical description,” Raaba, Oct. 2015 |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject.lemb | Prótesis dental |
dc.subject.lemb | Prosthodontics |
dc.subject.lemb | Implantes dentarios |
dc.subject.lemb | Implant dentures |
dc.subject.lemb | Materiales dentales |
dc.subject.lemb | Dental materials |
dc.subject.lemb | Calidad de los productos |
dc.subject.lemb | Quality of products |
dc.subject.proposal | Rugosidad |
dc.subject.proposal | Tolerancia dimensional |
dc.subject.proposal | Tornillos de fijación |
dc.subject.proposal | Implantes dentales |
dc.subject.proposal | Calidad de ajuste |
dc.subject.proposal | Macrogeometría |
dc.subject.proposal | Elongación |
dc.subject.proposal | Roughness |
dc.subject.proposal | Dimensional tolerance |
dc.subject.proposal | Retaining screws |
dc.subject.proposal | Implants |
dc.subject.proposal | Fit quality |
dc.subject.proposal | Macrogeometry |
dc.subject.proposal | Elongation |
dc.title.translated | Influence of surface roughness and macrogeometry on the quality of the fit between retaining screw and implant in implant-supported prostheses |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.content | Text |
dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Bibliotecarios |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Estudiantes |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Investigadores |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Maestros |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Proveedores de ayuda financiera para estudiantes |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Público general |
dc.description.curriculararea | Ingeniería Mecánica y Mecatrónica.Sede Bogotá |
dc.subject.umls | Tornillo de fijación |
dc.subject.umls | Locking screw |
Archivos en el documento
Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito