Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Prototipo de arquitectura empresarial con énfasis en procesos de negocio. Caso de estudio. Vicerrectoría de Investigación de Institución de Educación Superior

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorDuarte Amaya, Helga
dc.contributor.authorFernández Riomalo, Carlos Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-30T15:48:43Z
dc.date.available2020-01-30T15:48:43Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-18
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationIEEE
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75539
dc.description.abstractEste trabajo presenta el diseño y construcción de un prototipo de arquitectura empresarial, con énfasis en procesos de negocio para la vicerrectoría de investigación de una Institución de Educación Superior. El diseño de la arquitectura está centrado en TOGAF y se complementa con Archimate para la visualización arquitectónica. El diseño de los procesos de negocio se realiza bajo el estándar BPMN, utilizando Bizagi. Para llevar a cabo este proyecto, fue necesario levantar un estado del arte que dio como resultado un modelo de gestión de investigación, que integra las características relevantes de los marcos de gestión de investigación europeo, estadounidense, y la política nacional de CTeI de Colciencias. A lo largo del documento se muestra el análisis realizado a la vicerrectoría de investigación identificando su arquitectura actual del negocio. Una vez identificada esta arquitectura, se plantea la arquitectura objetivo del negocio y se lleva a cabo el análisis de brechas. Posteriormente se delimita el alcance del prototipo, diseñando su arquitectura de datos, aplicaciones y tecnología. Con el desarrollo del prototipo en la plataforma Bizagi, se comprueba que el llevar los procesos de negocio a determinado nivel de automatización, permite fácilmente a los stakeholder y a la alta dirección, conocer el estado de ejecución de cada uno de los procesos y tener alta disponibilidad de información, facilitando la toma de decisiones.
dc.description.abstractThis work presents the design and construction of a prototype of enterprise architecture, with emphasis on business processes for the research vice-rectory of an Institution of Higher Education. The design of the architecture is focused on TOGAF and is complemented with Archimate for architectural visualization. The design of the business processes is done under the BPMN standard, using Bizagi. To carry out this project, it was necessary to build a state of the art that resulted in a research management model, which integrates the relevant features of the European and American research management frameworks, and the national policy of CTeI de Colciencias. Throughout the document is shown the analysis made to the research vicerectory identifying its current business architecture. Once this architecture has been identified, the objective architecture of the business is proposed and the gap analysis is carried out. Then the scope of the prototype is defined, designing its data architecture, applications and technology. With the development of the prototype on the Bizagi platform, it is verified that taking business processes to a certain level of automation easily allows stakeholders and senior management to know the state of execution of each of the processes and have high availability of information, facilitating decision making
dc.format.extent225
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddcIngeniería de Sistemas y Computación
dc.titlePrototipo de arquitectura empresarial con énfasis en procesos de negocio. Caso de estudio. Vicerrectoría de Investigación de Institución de Educación Superior
dc.typeDocumento de trabajo
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.coverage.sucursalUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.description.additionalMagíster en Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computación. Línea de Investigación: Ingeniería de Software.
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.contributor.corporatenameDuarte-Amaya, Helga
dc.contributor.researchgroupColectivo de Investigación en Ingeniería de Software - ColSWE
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.references[1] Congreso de la República de Colombia, Ley 30 de Diciembre 28 de 1992. Colombia, 1992, p. 26. [2] Congreso de Colombia, “Ley 1286 de 2009,” El Congr. Colomb., vol. 2009, no. enero 23, pp. 1–19, 2009. [3] NTC 5800: Gestión de la Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (I+D+I). Terminologia y definición de las actividades de I+D+I. Colombia, 2008, pp. 1–12. [4] NTC 5801: Gestión de la Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (I+D+I). Requisitos del sistema de gestión de la I+D+I. Colombia, 2008, pp. 1–11. [5] NTC 5802: Gestión de la Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (I+D+I). Requisitos de un proyecto de I+D+I. Colombia, 2008, pp. 1–11. [6] L. Urbaczewski and S. Mrdalj, “A comparison of enterprise architecture frameworks,” Issues Inf. Syst., vol. VII, no. 2, pp. 18–23, 2006. [7] J. Mentz, P. Kotzé, and A. Van der Merwe, “A comparison of practitioner and researcher definitions of enterprise architecture using an interpretation method,” Adv. Enterp. Inf. Syst. II, pp. 11–26, 2012. [8] R. Ansyori, N. Qodarsih, and B. Soewito, “A systematic literature review: Critical Success Factors to Implement Enterprise Architecture,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 135, pp. 43–51, 2018. [9] T. Brown, “Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation,” vol. 31. Harper Collins, New York, USA, pp. viii, 264 p., 2009. [10] Vicrrectoría de investigación ECCI, “VICERRECTORÍA DE INVESTIGACIÓN PLAN ESTRATÉGICO DE INVESTIGACIÓN 2017-2021.,” Bogotá, 2017. [11] N. A. A. Bakar, S. Harihodin, and N. Kama, “Assessment of Enterprise Architecture Implementation Capability and Priority in Public Sector Agency,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 100, pp. 198–206, 2016. [12] A. Alwadain, E. Fielt, A. Korthaus, and M. Rosemann, “Empirical insights into the development of a service-oriented enterprise architecture,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 105, pp. 39–52, 2016. [13] Gartner, “EA Practitioners Have Significant Influence on $1.1 Trillion in Enterprise IT Spend.” [Online]. Available: https://www.gartner.com/id=2286216. [Accessed: 24-Jan-2018]. [14] W. A., B. P., L. L.-S., R. G., and R. I., “A method and tool for business-IT alignment in enterprise architecture,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 161, pp. 113–118, 2005. [15] J. A. Zachman, “A Framework for Information Systems Architecture,” in IBM Systmes Journal, 1987, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 454–470. [16] B. D. Rouhani, M. N. Mahrin, F. Nikpay, R. B. Ahmad, and P. Nikfard, “A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 62, pp. 1–20, 2015. [17] S. Spewak and M. Tiemann, “Updating the Enterprise Architecture Planning Model,” J. Enterp. Archit., vol. 2, no. May, pp. 11–19, 2006. [18] K. Medini and J. P. Bourey, “SCOR-based enterprise architecture methodology,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 594–607, 2012. [19] B. D. Rouhani, M. N. ri Mahrin, F. Nikpay, and P. Nikfard, “A comparison enterprise architecture implementation methodologies,” Proc. - 2013 Int. Conf. Informatics Creat. Multimedia, ICICM 2013, pp. 1–6, 2013. [20] S. Leist and G. Zellner, “Evaluation of Current Architecture Frameworks,” in Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing, 2006, pp. 1546–1553. [21] N. D. Duarte Osorio and A. D. Morales Botett, “Arquitectura Empresarial para el grupo de investigación E-soluciones,” pp. 1–134, 2013. [22] U. Congress, “Clinger-Cohen Act,” Public Law, vol. 1996, no. 5. pp. 1–55, 1996. [23] M. Arango Serna, J. Londoño Salazar, and J. Zapata Cortés, “Arquitectura Empresarial – Una Visión General,” Rev. Ing. Univ. Medellín, vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 101–111, 2010. [24] Z.-G. Tao, Y.-F. Luo, C.-X. Chen, M.-Z. Wang, and F. Ni, “Enterprise application architecture development based on DoDAF and TOGAF,” Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 627–651, 2017. [25] S. Buckl and C. M. Schweda, “On the State-of-the-Art in Enterprise Architecture Management Literature,” p. 144, 2011. [26] J. Varnus and N. Panaich, “TOGAF 9 Survey Results,” Palo Alto CA, 2009. [27] A. Josey, TOGAF Version 9.1 Enterprise Edition. 2011. [28] E. Arroyo, “Definición de principios de arquitectura para arquitectura empresarial de la organización,” 2015. [29] The Open Group, “Architecture Development Method (ADM).” [Online]. Available: http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap05.html. [Accessed: 23-Jan-2018]. [30] V. der M. P. Harrison Rachel, Homan Paul, Josey Andrew, Rouse Matthew F., Van Sante Tom, “TOGAF VERSION 9.1 - Guia de bolsillo,” 2013. [31] I. En et al., “Diseño de un framework de arquitectura empresarial usando enfoque agil, para un centro de investigación y transferencia de tecnologías de una institución de educación superior del Ecuador,” Escula Politécnica Nacional, 2015. [32] E. Rasdiana and Y. Bandung, “A centralized design of information network architecture for local government: A case study of Hulu Sungai Selatan regency,” 2016 Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Syst. Innov. ICITSI 2016 - Proc., 2017. [33] Y. Ruldeviyani, E. Wisnuwardhanu, and Y. Giri, “Designing enterprise architecture Case study of the ministry of energy and mineral resources,” J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 2185–2188, 2017. [34] I. Y. M. Edward, W. Shalannanda, S. I. Lestariningati, and A. Agusdian, “E-government master plan design with togaf framework,” Proc. 2014 8th Int. Conf. Telecommun. Syst. Serv. Appl. TSSA 2014, pp. 1–6, 2015. [35] Open Group, “Case Studies show TOGAF in use in a variety of situations,” 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.opengroup.org/public/arch/p4/cases/case_intro.htm#MoD. [Accessed: 27-Sep-2017]. [36] W. N. Bernal, G. C. Caballero, J. O. Sanchez, and H. Paez-Logreira, “Enterprise architecture framework oriented to cloud computing services,” 2016 6th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Control, no. Icccc, pp. 64–69, 2016. [37] I. Santikarama and A. A. Arman, “Designing enterprise architecture framework for non-cloud to cloud migration using TOGAF, CCRM, and CRMM,” 2016 Int. Conf. ICT Smart Soc. ICISS 2016, no. July, pp. 32–37, 2016. [38] R. Covington and H. Jahangir, “The Oracle Enterprise Architecture Framework,” 2009. [39] A. Ahmad Rais and R. Pecinovsky, “TOGAF usage in outsourcing of software development,” Acta Inform. Pragensia, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 68–76, 2013. [40] MinTIC, “Estrategia de Gobierno en línea 2012 - 2017,” Bogota, D.C, 2012. [41] MINTIC, “Manual Estrategia de Gobierno en Línea,” p. 74, 2015. [42] P. María and I. Mejía, “Arquitectura empresarial El camino hacia un gobierno integrado,” Bogotá, 2013. [43] H. C. Bueno and W. B. Pineda, “Identificación de principios de arquitectura empresarial para la gestión de factores de impacto en entidades públicas colombianas utilizando TOGAF,” Rev. Inven., pp. 22–28, 2016. [44] Min TIC, “Generalidades del Marco de Referencia de AE para la gestión de TI,” Bogota, D.C, 2017. [45] El Tiempo, “ENTIDADES, A CONSULTAR EL SICE.” [Online]. Available: http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/MAM-1555651. [Accessed: 16-Feb-2018]. [46] El Espectador, “Descalabro del SICE | ELESPECTADOR.COM,” 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/economia/descalabro-del-sice-articulo-332911. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2017]. [47] euroCRIS, “Main features of CERIF.” [Online]. Available: https://www.eurocris.org/cerif/main-features-cerif. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2018]. [48] D. Ivanović, D. Surla, M. Trajanović, D. Misić, and Z. Konjović, “Towards the Information System for Research Programmes of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 106, no. June 2016, pp. 122–129, 2017. [49] “CERIF - the Common European Research Information Format.” [Online]. Available: https://ercim-news.ercim.eu/en68/european-scene-qsupport-of-the-research-processq/cerif-the-common-european-research-information-format. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2018]. [50] J. Schöpfel, H. Prost, and V. Rebouillat, “Research Data in Current Research Information Systems,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 106, no. June 2016, pp. 305–320, 2017. [51] B. Jorg, J. Ferlez, E. Grabcewski, and M. Jermol, “IST world: European RTD information and service portal,” in CRIS 2006: Enabling Interaction and Quality: Beyond the Hanseatic League - 8th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, 2006, no. May, p. SAP AG-. [52] “SICRIS.” [Online]. Available: http://sicris.izum.si/default.aspx?lang=eng. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2018]. [53] Ministry of Education and Research, “Cristin.” [Online]. Available: http://www.cristin.no/. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2018]. [54] Elsevier, “Pure.” [Online]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/pure. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2018]. [55] Thomsonreuters, “Converis.” [Online]. Available: http://ipscience-help.thomsonreuters.com/converisLive/aboutConveris.html. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2018]. [56] L. Siciliano, S. Schmidt, and M. Kinzler, “BoRIS and BIA: CRIS and institutional repository integration at the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 33, no. 0, pp. 68–73, 2014. [57] R. McDonnell and S. Kerridge, “Research Information Management System (KRIMSON) at Kent,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 106, no. June 2016, pp. 160–167, 2017. [58] E. Amalia and H. Supriadi, “Development of enterprise architecture in university using TOGAF as framework,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 060004, p. 060004. [59] “About SICRIS.” [Online]. Available: http://www.sicris.si/about/cris.aspx?lang=eng. [Accessed: 19-Apr-2018]. [60] “About Crisitin- Cristin.” [Online]. Available: http://www.cristin.no/om-cristin/. [Accessed: 19-Apr-2018]. [61] “Features - Pure | Elsevier.” [Online]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/pure/features#modules. [Accessed: 19-Apr-2018]. [62] SIGMA, “SIGMA lidera la implementación de CERIF en EuroCRIS - SIGMA | helping universities succeed.” [Online]. Available: http://www.sigmaaie.org/es/noticia/sigma-lidera-la-implementacion-de-cerif-en-eurocris. [Accessed: 20-Apr-2018]. [63] N. I. of F. and Agriculture, “About REEIS.” [Online]. Available: https://reeis.usda.gov/about. [Accessed: 09-Nov-2018]. [64] N. I. of F. and Agriculture, “USDA / CRIS.” [Online]. Available: https://cris.nifa.usda.gov/aboutus.html. [Accessed: 09-Nov-2018]. [65] E. M. Cortez, “RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND ECONOMICS INFORMATION SYSTEM: AN ENGINE FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING AND INFORMATION POLICY DEVELOPMENT AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,” J. Gov. Inf., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 119–129, 1999. [66] “IRES: Integrated Research Enterprise Solution.” [Online]. Available: https://your.yale.edu/work-yale/training/research-training/ires-integrated-research-enterprise-solution. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2018]. [67] U. of Columbia, “Online Research Systems.” [Online]. Available: https://research.columbia.edu/content/online-research-systems. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2018]. [68] Columbia University’s, “Columbia University’s RASCAL - Research and Compliance Administration System.” [Online]. Available: https://www.rascal.columbia.edu/. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2018]. [69] P. Mangiafico, “Research Information Management at Duke University: A Researcher-Centered Approach,” 2017. [70] Symplectic, “Capture the evidence of impact.” [Online]. Available: https://symplectic.co.uk/elements-updates/capture-evidence-impact/. [Accessed: 13-Nov-2018]. [71] “Digital Science.” [Online]. Available: https://www.digital-science.com/. [Accessed: 07-Jun-2019]. [72] “Reputation - Digital Science.” [Online]. Available: https://www.digital-science.com/institutions/reputation/. [Accessed: 04-Mar-2019]. [73] R. Bryant et al., “Research Information Management : Defining RIM and the Library’s Role,” p. 24, 2017. [74] The University of Arizona, “About UA Vitae.” [Online]. Available: https://uavitae.arizona.edu/content/about-ua-vitae. [Accessed: 14-Nov-2018]. [75] Virginia Tech, “Electronic Faculty Activity Reporting.” [Online]. Available: https://www.provost.vt.edu/who_we_are/faculty_affairs/electronic_faculty_activity_reporting.html. [Accessed: 14-Nov-2018]. [76] Texas A&M University, “Scholars@TAMU.” [Online]. Available: http://scholars.library.tamu.edu/index.php. [Accessed: 14-Nov-2018]. [77] Syracuse University, “Experts@Syracuse.” [Online]. Available: https://experts.syr.edu/. [Accessed: 14-Nov-2018]. [78] Z. Z. Medzinárodnej Konferencie and B. Ebert, “Using a CRIS to Reduce Workload and Increase Quality for Research Reporting and University Marketing,” in Integration for Open Access to Scientific Outputs conference, 2014, pp. 1–48. [79] L. Dempsey, “Research information management systems - a new service category?,” Lorcan Dempsey’s Weblog, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://orweblog.oclc.org/research-information-management-systems-a-new-service-category/. [Accessed: 19-Nov-2018]. [80] J.-C. Plantin, C. Lagoze, and P. N. Edwards, “Re-integrating scholarly infrastructure: The ambiguous role of data sharing platforms,” Big Data Soc., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 205395171875668, 2018. [81] D. N. de Planeación, Politica Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Colombia, 2009, pp. 1–69. [82] M. Acosta et al., Colciencias cuarenta años: Entre la legitimidad, la normatividad y la práctica, 2013th ed. Bogota, D.C: Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología, 2013. [83] C. U. R. NUÑEZ, “PLAN ESTRATEGICO DE TECNOLOGÍA INFORMÁTICA (2009-2013),” Cartagena, 2010. [84] M. Bonfante, “Arquitectura empresarial con modelado integrado. Caso de estudio: Corporación Universitaria Rafael Nuñez,” Ing. y Tecnol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2011. [85] Universidad de Antioquia, “Sistema de Información para la Investigación Universitaria,” Universidad de Antioquia, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.udea.edu.co/wps/portal/udea/web/inicio/investigacion/gestion-investigacion/contenido/ascontenidosmenu/siiu. [Accessed: 28-Jun-2017]. [86] D. Angelica and C. Paola, “MANUAL DEL USUARIO Procesos de investigación y laboratorios,” Bogota, D.C, 2016. [87] V. de Investigación, “Sistema de información HERMES Componente de extensión Versión 2.0,” Bogota, D.C, 2017. [88] Universidad ECCI, “Historia Universidad ECCI.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ecci.edu.co/es/Bogota/historia-80. [Accessed: 09-Apr-2018]. [89] Universidad ECCI, “Organigrama - Universidad ECCI.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ecci.edu.co/es/Bogota/organigrama-919?language_content_entity=es. [Accessed: 09-Apr-2018]. [90] M. Porter, “Cadena de valor,” Estrategia magazine, no. 19, pp. 1–4, 2004. [91] Icontec, “NTC - ISO 9001: SISTEMA DE GESTIÓN DE LA CALIDAD,” pp. 1–21, 2008. [92] Colciencias, Modelo De Medición De Grupos De Investigación , Desarrollo Tecnológico O De Innovación Y De Reconocimiento De Investigadores Del Sistema Nacional De Ciencia , Tecnología E Innovación 2017, vol. 2017. 2017. [93] Consejo Nacional de Acreditación, “Lineamientos para la acreditación de programas de Pregrado,” Bogota, D.C, 2013. [94] “Entidad de proceso - Bizagi 11.2 BPM Suite User Guide - Digital Business Platform.” [Online]. Available: http://help.bizagi.com/bpm-suite/es/index.html?make_an_entity_a_process_entit.htm. [Accessed: 24-Jul-2019].
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalEnterprise Architecture; Business Processes; TOGAF; BPM; BPMN; Archimate
dc.subject.proposalArquitectura Empresarial; Procesos de negocio; TOGAF; BPM; BPMN; Archimate
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Nombre:
1061753918.2019.pdf
Tamaño:
6.047Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descargar

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito