Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorCorrea Motta, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorNovoa Lara, Jazmín Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T15:14:01Z
dc.date.available2020-08-13T15:14:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-30
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78020
dc.description.abstractQuod animi mores (QAM) se identifica a menudo con una defensa materialista y determinista de la sustancia del alma y su relación con el cuerpo. De acuerdo con esta identificación, la discusión académica contemporánea sobre la psicología moral de Galeno limita en cierta medida las conclusiones de QAM a la negación de toda responsabilidad moral y agencia personal. En la presente disertación, argumento que tales posiciones malinterpretan el interés de Galeno en la naturaleza moral de los seres humanos en tanto substancialmente corporizados (embodied) y animados (ensouled). Propongo, entonces, estudiar las tesis de Galeno con un énfasis en los análisis epistemológicos, ontológicos y éticos de su aproximación a la naturaleza humana y planteo la noción de sí mismo (self) como una posibilidad conceptual que nos permite entender la articulación entre concepciones de causalidad distintas y contradictorias, así como entre explicaciones distintas y complementarias, respecto a los fenómenos psicológicos y fisiológicos.
dc.description.abstractQuod animi mores (QAM) is frequently read as a materialist and determinist defence of the substance of the soul and its relation to the body. Among contemporary scholarly discussions on Galen's moral psychology, the outcomes of QAM are also framed by this reading, which entails somehow a denial of any account of moral responsibility and personal agency. In this dissertation, I argue that those interpretations misunderstand Galen’s interest in the moral nature of human beings as substantially ensouled and embodied, so I propose understanding Galen’s thesis with a focus on the epistemological, ontological, and ethical analysis involved in his approach to human nature. I address the notion of self as a conceptual possibility that allows us to understand the articulations between different and conflicting accounts of causation as well as between different and complementary kinds of explanations regarding physiological and psychological phenomena.
dc.format.extent118
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc100 - Filosofía y Psicología
dc.subject.ddc180 - Filosofía antigua , medieval, oriental
dc.subject.ddc128 - Humanidad
dc.titleEmbodied Soul and Ensouled Body: Moral Self in Galen’s Account of Soul and Body
dc.title.alternativeAlma corporizada y cuerpo animado: sí mismo moral en el análisis de Galeno sobre alma y cuerpo
dc.typeOtro
dc.rights.spaAcceso abierto
dc.description.additionalLínea de Investigación: Filosofía Antigua
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Filosofía
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Filosofía
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAnnas, J. (1992). Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Berkely: University of California Press.
dc.relation.referencesBazou, A. (2011). Γαλενοῦ Ὅτι ταῖς τοῦ σώματος κράσεσιν αἱ τῆς ψυχῆς δυνάμεις ἕπονται. Athens: Ακαδημια Αθηνων.
dc.relation.referencesBurnet, J. (1900). Phaedo. En: Platonis opera. vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesCaston, V. (1997). Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern. The Philosophical Review, 106(3), 309–363.
dc.relation.referencesChiaradonna, R. (2014). Galen on what is persuasive (pithanon) and what approximates to truth. In P. Adamson, R. Hansberger, & J. Wilberding (Eds.), Philosophical Themes in Galen (pp. 62–88). London: Institute of Classical Studies.
dc.relation.referencesDe Lacy, P. (1972). Galen's Platonism. The American Journal of Philology, 93(1), 27–39.
dc.relation.referencesDe Lacy, P. (2005). Galeni De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesDonini, P. (2008). Psychology. In J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (pp. 184–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesFrede, M. (1981). On Galen’s Epistemology. In V. Nutton (Ed.), Galen: Problems and prospects: A collection of papers submitted at the 1979 Cambridge conference. London: Wellcome Inst. for the History of Medicine.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Ballester, L. (1972). Alma y enfermedad en la obra de Galeno. Traducción y comentario del escrito ‘Quod animi mores corporis temperamenta sequantur’. Valencia: Cuadernos.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Ballester, L. (1988). Soul and Body, Disease of the Soul and Disease of the Body in Galen’s medical thought. In P. Manuli & M. Vegetti (Eds.), Le Opere Psicologiche Di Galeno (pp. 117–152). Pavia: Bibliopolis.
dc.relation.referencesGill, C. (2009). Galen and the Stoics: What each could learn from the other about embodied psychology. In D. Frede & B. Reis (Eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy (pp. 409– 423). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216523
dc.relation.referencesGill, C. (2010). Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (1993). Actions and passions: affection, emotion, and moral self-management in Galen’s philosophical psychology. In J. Brunschwig & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), Passions & Perceptions. Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum (pp. 184–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (2006). Body and Soul in Galen. In R. A. H. King (Ed.), Common to Body and Soul. Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity (pp. 232–258). Berlin: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (2008a). Epistemology. In J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (pp. 157–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (2008b). Philosophy of Nature. In J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (pp. 210–241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (2008c). The man and his work. In J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (2014a). Galen and the Ontology of Powers. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(5), 951–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2014.988118
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (2014b). Partitioning the Soul: Galen on the Anatomy of the Psychic Functions and Mental Illness. In K. Corcilius & D. Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz (pp. 85–106). Berlin: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (2017a). Substance, Element, Quality, Mixture: Galen’s Physics and His Hippocratic Inheritance. Aitia. Regards Sur La Culture Hellénistique Au XXIe Siècle, 7(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/aitia.1863
dc.relation.referencesHankinson, J. (2017b). Survival and the Self. Materialism and Metempsychosis — Ancient Attitudes, Modern Perspectives. In R. Seaford, J. Wilkins, & M. Wright (Eds.), Selfhood and the Soul. Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill (pp. 67–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, B. (2014). Galen on the chances of life. In V. Wohl (Ed.), Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought (pp. 230–250). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279551.014
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, B. (2017). The Body of Western Embodiment. Classical Antiquity and the Early History of a Problem. In J. E. H. Smith (Ed.), Embodiment. A History (pp. 17–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHustvedt. (2016). Philosophy Matters in Brain Matters. In A Woman Looking at Men Looking at Women. London: Simon & Schuster.
dc.relation.referencesKühn, C. G. (1821). Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia, editionen curavit C.G. Kühn. Leipzig.
dc.relation.referencesKupreeva, I. (2004). Aristotelian Dynamics in the 2ND Century School Debates: Galen and Alexander of Aphrodisias on Organic Powers and Movements. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 83, 71–95.
dc.relation.referencesLang, H. (2017). Embodied or ensouled: Aristotle and the Relation between Soul and Body. In J. Smith (Ed.), Embodiment. A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLloyd, G. E. R. (1988). Scholarship, Authority and Argument in Galen’s Quod Animi Mores. In P. Manuli & M. Vegetti (Eds.), Le opere psicologiche di Galeno (pp. 11–42). Pavia: Bibliopolis.
dc.relation.referencesLloyd, G. E. R. (2003). In the Grip of Disease. Studies in the Greek Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLong, A. A. (2015). Greek Models of Mind and Self. London: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLong, A. A., & Sedly, D. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165907
dc.relation.referencesMaiese, M. (2011). Embodiment, Emotion, and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesMarechal, P. (2019). Galen’s constitutive materialism. Ancient Philosophy, 39(1), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil201939110
dc.relation.referencesMolina González, L. C. (2012). Fisiología y ética. Fundamentos fisiológicos de la psicología moral en Galeno de Pérgamo. Universidad de Valladolid.
dc.relation.referencesMoreno Rodríguez, R. M. (2013). Ética y medicina en la obra de Galeno. Dynamis, 33(2), 441– 460.
dc.relation.referencesMüller, I. (1891). Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora. Leipzig.
dc.relation.referencesRocca, J. (2008). Anatomy. In J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (pp. 242–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSalles, R. (2013). Determinism, Fatalism, and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. In H. Dyke & D. Bardon (Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time (pp. 59–72). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.relation.referencesSalles, R. (2017). Soul as Harmony in Phaedo 85e–86d and Stoic Pneumatic Theory. In V. Harte & R. Woolf (Eds.), Rereading Ancient Philosophy: Old Chestnuts and Sacred Cows (pp. 221–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesScaltsas, T. (1990). Soul as Attunement: An Analogy or a Model? In P. Nicolacopoulos (Ed.), Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (pp. 109–119). Dordrecht: Springer.
dc.relation.referencesSheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). Why a mind is not a brain and a brain is not a body. In The Primacy of Movement. (pp. 348–390). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
dc.relation.referencesSinger, P. N. (1997a). Galen: Selected Works, translated with an introduction and notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSinger, P. N. (1997b). Levels of Explanation in Galen. The Classical Quarterly, 47(2), 525–542.
dc.relation.referencesSinger, P. N. (2013). Galen: Psychological Writings. In P. N. Singer (Ed.), Cambridge Galen Translations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSinger, P. N. (2014). Galen and the Philosophers: Philosophical Engagement, Shadowy Contemporaries, Aristotelian Transformations. In P. Adamson, R. Hansberger, & J. Wilberding (Eds.), Philosophical Themes in Galen (pp. 7–38). London: Institute of Classical Studies.
dc.relation.referencesSorabji, R. (1999). Soul and Self in Ancient Philosophy. In M. J. C. Crabbe (Ed.), From Soul to Self (pp. 8–32). London and New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesSorabji, R. (2006). Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesSteel, C. (2001). The Moral Purpose of the Human Body" A Reading of ‘Timaeus’ 69-72. Phronesis, 46(2), 105–128.
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, J. S. (Ed.). (2013). The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death. New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesTieleman, T. (1996). Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul. Leiden: Brill.
dc.relation.referencesTieleman, T. (2003). Galen’s Psychology. In J. Barnes & J. Jouanna (Eds.), Galien et la Philosophie (pp. 131–169). Vandoeuvres-Genève: Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique XLIX.
dc.relation.referencesVan der Eijk, Philip. (2005). Medicine and Philosophy In Classical Antiquity. Doctors and Philosophers on Nature, Soul, Health and Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesVan der Eijk, Philiph. (forthcoming). Galen on soul, mixture and pneuma. In B. Inwood & J. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Symposium of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesVan der Eijk, Philiph. (2014). Galen on the Nature of Human Beings. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement(114), 89–134.
dc.relation.referencesVan der Eijk, Philiph. (2015). Galen on the Assessment of Bodily Mixtures. In B. Holmes (Ed.), The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (pp. 675– 698). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110336337-031
dc.relation.referencesVinkesteijn, R. (2019). Mixing Body and Soul: Galen on the Substance of Soul in QAM and De Propriis Placitis. Phronesis, 1–23.
dc.relation.referencesZaragoza, J. (2003). Sobre las facultades naturales. Las facultades del alma siguen los temperamentos del cuerpo. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.proposalfacultades del alma
dc.subject.proposalfaculties of the soul
dc.subject.proposalmezclas de las cualidades elementales
dc.subject.proposalmixtures of the elementary qualities
dc.subject.proposalmaterialismo
dc.subject.proposalmaterialism
dc.subject.proposaldeterminism
dc.subject.proposaldeterminismo
dc.subject.proposalrelación alma-cuerpo
dc.subject.proposalcausation
dc.subject.proposalsoul-body relation
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito