Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento
Diseño y validación interna de un instrumento de autoinforme para caracterizar las estrategias de aprendizaje de programación de computadores
dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ramírez Echeverry, Jhon Jairo |
dc.contributor.advisor | Restrepo Calle, Felipe |
dc.contributor.author | Torres Jiménez, Stephanie |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-02T17:38:23Z |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-02T17:38:23Z |
dc.date.issued | 2021 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79877 |
dc.description | ilustraciones, tablas |
dc.description.abstract | En virtud de la gran acogida que la programación de computadores ha tenido en los últimos años tanto en la academia como en la industria, una inmensa mayoría de universidades la han incluido en sus currículos de Ingeniería. Sin embargo, la complejidad que la programación representa para muchos estudiantes producen altos niveles de deserción y pérdida de las asignaturas relacionadas con este conocimiento. Diversos autores han empleado instrumentos de autoinforme para determinar los aspectos que influyen positivamente durante el proceso de aprendizaje de la programación y que a su vez permiten lograr un aprendizaje significativo. Aunque en el marco del aprendizaje autorregulado se evidencia una gran cantidad de instrumentos que caracterizan aspectos como la motivación, no se encuentra un instrumento enfocado en la caracterización de las estrategias de aprendizaje de la programación de computadores. En ese sentido, este trabajo de investigación explora e identifica diferentes estrategias de aprendizaje con el objetivo de recopilarlas en un instrumento de autoinforme, el cual se denominó Cuestionario sobre Estrategias de Aprendizaje de la Programación de Computadores - CEAPC. La construcción del CEAPC se logró gracias a los procesos de diseño y validación llevados a cabo a través de una metodología mixta compuesta por métodos cuantitativos, como el Análisis Factorial Exploratorio y el cálculo del coeficiente del α de Cronbach, y métodos cualitativos como los grupos focales y las entrevistas semi-estructuradas. Los resultados fueron positivos en cuanto a las propiedades psicométricas obtenidas para el instrumento, como la validez de constructo y los índices de confiabilidad. Cuenta por un lado, con ítems de cargas factoriales mayores a 0.3 y por otro lado con valores de α de Cronbach entre 0.6 y 0.8, los cuales son aceptables de acuerdo con la literatura. Cabe resaltar que este instrumento permitirá identificar las estrategias que influyen en un proceso de aprendizaje profundo de la programación de computadores y, además, dará la posibilidad de determinar el rol que desempeña la autorregulación en el aprendizaje en esta área en particular. Así mismo, la caracterización de las estrategias de aprendizaje autorregulado, llevada a cabo a través del instrumento propuesto, permitirá plantear modos de aprendizaje fuera y dentro del aula. (Texto tomado de la fuente) |
dc.description.abstract | Due to the great reception of computer programming in recent years, both in academia and in industry, several universities have included it in their Engineering curricula. However, the complexity that programming represents to many students produces high dropout rates and failing grades in subjects related to this knowledge. Various authors have used self-report instruments to determine the aspects that positively influence the programming learning process and allow significant learning to be achieved. Although there is evidence of a large number of instruments in self-regulated learning that characterize aspects such as motivation, there is no instrument focused on characterizing the learning strategies of computer programming. In this sense, this research explores and identifies different learning strategies to compile them in a self-report instrument, which was called Cuestionario sobre Estrategias de Aprendizaje de la Programación de Computadores - CEAPC. The construction of the CEAPC was achieved thanks to the design and validation processes carried out through a mixed methodology composed of quantitative methods, such as Exploratory Factor Analysis and the calculation of the coefficient of Cronbach’s α, and qualitative methods such as focus groups and semi-structured interviews. The results were positive regarding the psychometric properties obtained for the instrument, such as construct validity and reliability indices. On the one hand, items had factor loadings greater than 0.3 and, on the other hand, values of Cronbach’s α range between 0.6 and 0.8, which are acceptable according to the literature. It should be noted that this instrument will allow identifying the strategies that influence a profound learning process of computer programming and, determining the role that self-regulation plays in learning in this particular area. Likewise, the characterization of the self-regulated learning strategies accomplished through the proposed instrument will allow proposing of learning modes outside and inside the classroom. (Text taken from source) |
dc.format.extent | 176 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf |
dc.language.iso | spa |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights | Derechos reservados al autor, 2021 |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.subject.ddc | 000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::005 - Programación, programas, datos de computación |
dc.title | Diseño y validación interna de un instrumento de autoinforme para caracterizar las estrategias de aprendizaje de programación de computadores |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
dcterms.audience | General |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computación |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | PLaS - Programming Languages and Systems |
dc.description.degreelevel | Maestría |
dc.description.degreename | Magíster en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computación |
dc.description.researcharea | Computación Aplicada - Educación en Ingeniería |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
dc.publisher.department | Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingeniería |
dc.publisher.place | Bogotá, Colombia |
dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
dc.relation.references | Ambrosio, A. P., Almeida, L., Franco, A., Martins, S. & Georges, F. (2012). Assessment of self-regulated attitudes and behaviors of introductory programming students. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462314 |
dc.relation.references | Aron, J. D. (1974). The Program Development Process, Addison-Wesley. |
dc.relation.references | Babakus, E. & Mangold, W. G. (1992). Adapting the SERVQUAL Scale to Hospital Services: An empirital investigation. |
dc.relation.references | Bandura, A. (2005). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 |
dc.relation.references | Begel, A. & Simon, B. (2008). Novice software developers, all over again. ICER’08 - Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on International Computing Education Research, 1(425), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1404520.1404522 |
dc.relation.references | Berger, J.-L. & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 416-428. |
dc.relation.references | Bergin, S., Reilly, R. & Traynor, D. (2005). Examining the role of self-regulated learning on introductory programming performance. First International Workshop on Computing Education Research, 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089786.1089794 |
dc.relation.references | Biggs, J. B. (1987). Study Process Questionnaire Manual. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED308200.pdf |
dc.relation.references | Bishop-Clark, C. (1995). Cognitive style, personality, and computer programming. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(2), 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(94)00034-F |
dc.relation.references | Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated Learning at the Junction of Cognition and Motivation. |
dc.relation.references | Boekaerts, M. (1999). Motivated learning: Studying student * situation transactional units. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173110 |
dc.relation.references | Bryman, A. (2012). Social Reseach Methods (4th, Vol. 66). Oxford University Press. |
dc.relation.references | Cárdenas, S. F. (2013). Los constructos en las investigaciones pedagógicas: cuantificación y tratamiento estadístico. Revista Científico Pedagógica, 24(23). |
dc.relation.references | Carretero-Dios, H. & Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(3), 521-551. |
dc.relation.references | Caruso, T., Hill, N., Van DeGrift, T. & Simon, B. (2011). Experience report: Getting novice programmers to THINK about improving their software development process. SIGCSE’11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 493-498. https://doi.org/10. 1145/1953163.1953307 |
dc.relation.references | Castellanos, H., Restrepo-Calle, F., González, F. A. & Echeverry, J. J. R. (2017). Understanding the relationships between self-regulated learning and students source code in a computer programming course. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2017-Octob, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190467 |
dc.relation.references | Cetin, I. & Ozden, M. Y. (2015). Development of computer programming attitude scale for university students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(5), 667-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21639 |
dc.relation.references | Chen, C. & Whitesel, J. (2012). The Validity and Reliability Study of a Revised Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for Assessing Computer Software Learning Strategies. International Journal of E-Adoption, 4(2), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.4018/jea.2012040103 |
dc.relation.references | Cheng, G., Poon, L. K., Lau, W. W. & Zhou, R. C. (2019). Applying eye tracking to identify students’ use of learning strategies in understanding program code. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 140-144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345120.3345144 |
dc.relation.references | Chyung, Y. S., Moll, A. J. & Berg, S. A. (2010). The Role of Intrinsic Goal Orientation, Self-Efficacy, and E-Learning Practice in Engineering Education. |
dc.relation.references | Cicchinelli, A., Veas, E., Pardo, A., Pammer-Schindler, V., Fessl, A., Barreiros, C. & Lindstädt, S. (2018). Finding traces of self-regulated learning in activity streams. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge - LAK ’18, 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170381 |
dc.relation.references | Clement, C. A., Kurland, D. M., Mawby, R. & Pea, R. D. (1986). Analogical Reasoning and Computer Programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(4), 473-486. https://doi.org/10.2190/dfh5-e0pg-1ml4-m34j |
dc.relation.references | Creswell, J. W. (2009). Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications. |
dc.relation.references | Croasmun, J. T. . & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-type scales in the social sciences. |
dc.relation.references | Curione, K. & Huertas, J. A. (2017). MSLQ-UY , validation with Uruguayan university students. 17(2),1-17. |
dc.relation.references | Danielsiek, H., Toma, L. & Vahrenhold, J. (2017). An instrument to assess self-Efficacy in introductory algorithms courses. ACM International Computing Education Research, 9(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3106171 |
dc.relation.references | Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10- point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 61-104. |
dc.relation.references | Decker, A. & McGill, M. M. (2019). A topical review of evaluation instruments for computing education. SIGCSE 2019 - Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 558-564. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287393 |
dc.relation.references | Demir, O. & Seferoglu, S. S. (2020). A Comparison of Solo and Pair Programming in Terms of Flow Experience, Coding Quality, and Coding Achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1-19. |
dc.relation.references | Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M. & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La Entrevista, Recurso Flexible y Dinámico. Investigación en educación médica, 2(7), 162-167. |
dc.relation.references | Dorn, B. & Elliott Tew, A. (2015). Empirical validation and application of the computing attitudes survey. Computer Science Education, 25(1), 1-36. |
dc.relation.references | Ebomoyi, J. I. (2020). Metacognition and Peer Learning Strategies as Predictors in Problem-Solving Performance in Microbiology. 21(1). |
dc.relation.references | Eltegani, N. & Butgereit, L. (2015). Attributes of students engagement in fundamental programming learning. Proceedings - 2015 International Conference on Computing, Control, Networking, Electronics and Embedded Systems Engineering, ICCNEEE 2015, 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCNEEE.2015.7381438 |
dc.relation.references | Entwistle, N. & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0 |
dc.relation.references | Escobar-Avila, J., Venuti, D., Di Penta, M. & Haiduc, S. (2019). A survey on online learning preferences for computer science and programming. Proceedings - 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training, ICSE-SEET 2019, 41, 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2019.00026 |
dc.relation.references | Falkner, K., Vivian, R. & Falkner, N. J. (2014). Identifying computer science self-regulated learning strategies. ITICSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, 291-296. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591715 |
dc.relation.references | Ferrando, P. J. & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 28-33. |
dc.relation.references | Fuller, U., Johnson, C. G., Ahoniemi, T., Cukierman, D., Hernán-Losada, I., Jackova, J., Lahtinen, E., Lewis, T. L., Thompson, D. M., Riedesel, C. & Thompson, E. (2007). Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomy. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(4), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1345375.1345438 |
dc.relation.references | Gallego-Romero, J. M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I. & Delgado Kloos, C. (2020). Analyzing learners’ engagement and behavior in MOOCs on programming with the Codeboard IDE. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09773-6 |
dc.relation.references | Garcia, R., Falkner, K. & Vivian, R. (2018). Systematic literature review: Self-Regulated Learning strategies using e-learning tools for Computer Science. Computers and Education, 123, 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.006 |
dc.relation.references | García, T. & McKeachie, W. (2006). The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 19(3), 717-736. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-05-00517-5 |
dc.relation.references | González-Torres, M.-C. & Torrano, F. (2012). Methods and instruments for measuring self-regulated learning. En A. Valle y J. C. Nunez (Eds.), Handbook of Instructional Resources & Applications. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. |
dc.relation.references | Hamui-Sutton, A. & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La técnica de grupos focales. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(5), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2007-5057(13)72683-8 |
dc.relation.references | Hulin, C., Netemeyer, R. & Cudeck, R. (2001). Can a Reliability Coefficient Be Too High? |
dc.relation.references | Inzunza, B., Pérez, C., Márquez, C., Ortiz, L., Marcellini, S. & Duk, S. (2016). Estructura Factorial y Confiabilidad del Cuestionario de Motivación y Estrategias de Aprendizaje, MSLQ, en Estudiantes Universitarios Chilenos de Primer Año. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP47.2.02 |
dc.relation.references | Jackson, C. R. (2018). Validating and Adapting the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for STEM Courses at an HBCU. AERA Open, 4, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418809346 |
dc.relation.references | Jacobse, A. E. & Harskamp, E. G. (2012). Towards efficient measurement of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7(2), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9088-x |
dc.relation.references | Juarez-Ramirez, R., Navarro, C. X., Tapia-Ibarra, V., Macias-Olvera, R. & Guerra-Garcia, C. (2019). What is Programming? Putting all Together - A Set of Skills Required. 2018 6th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1109/conisoft.2018.8645956 |
dc.relation.references | Konecki, M. (2014). Problems in Programming Education and Means of Their Improvement. https://doi.org/10.2507/daaam.scibook.2014.37 |
dc.relation.references | Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R. & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 |
dc.relation.references | Kumar, V., Winne, P., Hadwin, A., Nesbit, J., Jamieson-Noel, D., Calvert, T. & Samin, B. (2005). Effects of self-regulated learning in programming. Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’05), 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2005.131 |
dc.relation.references | Linhorst, D. M. (2002). A Review of the Use and Potential of Focus Groups in Social Work Research. Qualitative Social Work, 1(2), 208-228. |
dc.relation.references | Loksa, D. & Ko, A. J. (2016). The Role of Self-Regulation in Programming Problem Solving Process and Success. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research -ICER ’16, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960334 |
dc.relation.references | Loksa, D., Ko, A. J., Jernigan, W., Oleson, A., Mendez, C. J. & Burnett, M. M. (2016). Programming, Problem Solving, and Self-Awareness: Effects of Explicit Guidance. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1449-1461. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858252 |
dc.relation.references | McDougall, A., Boyle, M., Pellas, N. & Peroutseas, E. (2016). Student Strategies for Learning Computer Programming: Implications for Pedagogy in Informatics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000027924.69726.b5 |
dc.relation.references | McGill, T. J. & Volet, S. E. (1997). A conceptual framework for analyzing students’ knowledge of programming. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(3), 276-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1997.10782199 |
dc.relation.references | Méndez Martínez, C. & Sepúlveda Rondón, M. A. (2012). Introducción al análisis factorial exploratorio. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 41(1), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-7450(14)60077-9 |
dc.relation.references | Muñiz, J., Elosua, P. & Hambleton, R. (1975). International Test Commission Guidelines for Test Translation and Adaptation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1975.tb00322.x |
dc.relation.references | Nassar-McMillan, S. C., Wyer, M., Oliver-Hoyo, M. & Ryder-Burge, A. (2010). Using Focus Groups in Preliminary Instrument Development: Expected and Unexpected Lessons Learned Sylvia. The Qualitative Report, 15(6), 1621-1634. |
dc.relation.references | Nausheen, M. (2016). An Adaptation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for Postgraduate Students in Pakistan: Results of an Exploratory Factor Analysis An Adaptation of the MSLQ for PGS in Pakistan: Results of an Exploratory Factor Analysis. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(1), 1-16. |
dc.relation.references | Niemczyk, M. C. & Savenye, W. C. (2001). The Relationship of student motivation and self-regulated learning strategies to performance in an undergraduate computer literacy course. Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 311-322. |
dc.relation.references | Osterlind, S. J. (1991). Constructing Test Items: Multiple-Choice, Constructed-Response, Performance, and Other Formats (Vol. 14). https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(91)90058-o |
dc.relation.references | Ostroff, C. & Kozlowski, S. W. (1992). Organizational Socialization As a Learning Process: the Role of Information Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00971.x |
dc.relation.references | Ott, C., Robins, A., Haden, P. & Shephard, K. (2015). Illustrating performance indicators and course characteristics to support students’ self-regulated learning in CS1. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 174-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1033129 |
dc.relation.references | Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 |
dc.relation.references | Park, H., Kim, K., Robertson, C. & Kim, D. (2019). The Effect of Memorization on the Retention and Learning Acquisition of Programming Practice. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v14i2.1378 |
dc.relation.references | Pedrosa, D., Cravino, J., Morgado, L. & Barreira, C. (2016). Self-regulated learning in computer programming: Strategies students adopted during an assignment. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 621, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41769-1_7 |
dc.relation.references | Pedrosa, D., Cravino, J., Morgado, L. & Barreira, C. (2017). Self-regulated learning in higher education: strategies adopted by computer programming students when supported by the SimProgramming approach. Production, 27(spe), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.225516 |
dc.relation.references | Pett, M. & Lackey, N. (2003). Making Sense of Factor Analysis (Vol. 50). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984898 |
dc.relation.references | Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, 3(2), 13-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02338175 |
dc.relation.references | Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Learning Questionnaire Motivated Strategies for (MSLQ). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p156 |
dc.relation.references | Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024 |
dc.relation.references | Porter, R. & Calder, P. (2004). Patterns in learning to program: an experiment? http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=980000 |
dc.relation.references | Prather, J., Pettit, R., Becker, B. A., Denny, P., Loksa, D., Peters, A., Albrecht, Z. & Masci, K. (2019). First Things First: Providing Metacognitive Scaffolding for Interpreting Problem Prompts. Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’19, 531-537. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287374 |
dc.relation.references | Rafique, W., Dou, W., Hussain, K. & Ahmed, K. (2020). Factors influencing programming expertise in a web-based e-learning paradigm. Online Learning Journal, 24(1), 162-181. https://doi.org/10. 24059/olj.v24i1.1956 |
dc.relation.references | Ramalingam, V. & Wiedenbeck, S. (2005). Development and Validation of Scores on a Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Scale and Group Analyses of Novice Programmer Self-Efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(4), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.2190/c670-y3c8-ltj1-ct3p |
dc.relation.references | Ramírez, M. d. C., Canto, J. E., Bueno, J. A. & Echazarreta, A. (2013). Validación Psicométrica del Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire en Universitarios Mexicanos. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(1). |
dc.relation.references | Ramírez Echeverry, J. J., Rosales Castro, L. F., Restrepo Calle, F. & González, F. A. (2018). Self-regulated learning in a computer programming course. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 13(2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2018.2831758 |
dc.relation.references | Ramírez-Echeverry, J. J., García-Carrillo, À. & Olarte Dussán, F. A. (2016). Adaptation and Validation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire - MSLQ - in Engineering Students in Colombia. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 1774-1787. |
dc.relation.references | Renumol, V., Jayaprakash, S. & Janakiram, D. (2009). Classification of cognitive difficulties of students to learn computer programming. Indian Institute of Technology, India, 12. |
dc.relation.references | Rodríguez-Mesa, F., Kolmos, A. & Du, X. (2017). Diversidad del PBL - Principios y modelos de apren. Aprendizaje basado en problemas en ingeniería Teoría y práctica. |
dc.relation.references | Rovers, S. F., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H. H., de Bruin, A. B. & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2019). Granularity matters: comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09188-6 |
dc.relation.references | Rum, S. N. & Ismail, M. (2016). Metacognitive awareness assessment and introductory computer programming course achievement at university. International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 13(6), 667-676. |
dc.relation.references | Sabogal, L. F., Barraza, E., Hernández, A. & Zapata, L. (2011). Validación del cuestionario de motivación y estrategias de aprendizaje forma corta-MSLQ SF, en estudiantes universitarios de una institución pública-Santa Marta. Psicogente, 14(25), 36-50. |
dc.relation.references | Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Edovald, T. & Õun, K. (2015). Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Estonian Version of MSLQ. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 597-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.278 |
dc.relation.references | Schellings, G. (2011). Applying learning strategy questionnaires: Problems and possibilities. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9069-5 |
dc.relation.references | Schellings, G. & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2011). Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: theoretical and empirical considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9081-9 |
dc.relation.references | Schellings, G. L., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., Veenman, M. V. & Meijer, J. (2013). Assessing metacognitive activities: The in-depth comparison of a task-specific questionnaire with think-aloud protocols. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 963-990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0149-y |
dc.relation.references | Schraw, G. & Sperling, R. (1994). Assesing Metacognitive Awareness. |
dc.relation.references | Smrithi Rekha, V. & Venkatapathy, S. (2015). Understanding the usage of online forums as learning platforms. Procedia Computer Science, 46(Icict 2014), 499-506. https: / /doi.org /10.1016 /j.procs.2015.02.074 |
dc.relation.references | Soemantri, D., McColl, G. & Dodds, A. (2018). Measuring medical students’ reflection on their learning: Modification and validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1384-y |
dc.relation.references | Soloway, E. & Ehrlich, K. (1984). Empirical Studies of Programming Knowledge. Ieee Transactions on Software Engineering, 10(5), 595-609. |
dc.relation.references | Suárez, O. & Mora, C. (2016). Adaptación y validación del inventario MSLQ para los cursos iniciales de física en la educación superior. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 10(3), 1-11. |
dc.relation.references | Susac, A., Bubic, A., Kaponja, J., Planinic, M. & Palmovic, M. (2014). Eye movements reveals student’s strategies in simple equation solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 555-577. |
dc.relation.references | Tek, F. B., Benli, K. S. & Deveci, E. (2018). Implicit Theories and Self-Efficacy in an Introductory Programming Course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(3), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2017.2789183 |
dc.relation.references | Tong, F., Guo, H., Wang, Z., Min, Y., Guo, W. & Yoon, M. (2019). Examining cross-cultural transferability of self- regulated learning model: an adaptation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire for Chinese adult learners. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1590183 |
dc.relation.references | Tsai, C. Y. (2019). Improving students’ understanding of basic programming concepts through visual programming language: The role of self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 95(May 2018), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.038 |
dc.relation.references | Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. A. & Zait, A. (2013). How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. 7th International Conference on Globalization and Higher Education in Economics and Business Administration GEBA. |
dc.relation.references | Watson, J. C. (2017). Establishing evidence for internal structure using exploratory factor analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336931 |
dc.relation.references | Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. En M. C. Wittrock (Handbooko). MacMillan. |
dc.relation.references | Weinstein, C Palmen, D. (1990). LASSI-HS User’s Manual, 1-32. |
dc.relation.references | Whittall, S. J., Prashandi, W. A. C., Himasha, G. L. S., Silva, D. I. D. & Suriyawansa, T. K. (2017). CodeMage: Educational Programming Environment For Beginners. 9th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST), Chonburi, 2017, pp. 311-316., 311-316. |
dc.relation.references | Williams, B., Onsman, A. & Brown, T. (1996). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Journl of Emergency Primary Health Care, 19(May), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763982 |
dc.relation.references | Winne, P. H. & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring Self-Regulated Learning. Handbook of Self-Regulation. |
dc.relation.references | Wolters, C. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. (August 1995), 27-47. |
dc.relation.references | Zhao, W. X., Zhang, W., He, Y., Xie, X. & Wen, J. R. (2018). Automatically learning topics and difficulty levels of problems in online judge systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3158670 |
dc.relation.references | Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Springer Series in Cognitive Development (p. 25). Springer, New York, NY. |
dc.relation.references | Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-67. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102 |
dc.relation.references | Zimmerman, B. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 |
dc.relation.references | Zimmermann, S. A., Weinstein, C. E. & Palmer, D. R. (1988). Assessing learning strategies: the design and development of the lassi. Learning and Study Strategies(pp. 25-40). ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-742460-6.50009-8 |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject.proposal | Aprendizaje autorregulado |
dc.subject.proposal | Programación de computadores |
dc.subject.proposal | Estrategias de aprendizaje |
dc.subject.proposal | Instrumento de autoinforme |
dc.subject.proposal | CEAPC |
dc.subject.proposal | propiedad psicométrica |
dc.subject.proposal | MSLQ |
dc.subject.proposal | LASSI |
dc.subject.proposal | Self-regulated learning |
dc.subject.proposal | Computer programming |
dc.subject.proposal | Learning strategies |
dc.subject.proposal | Self-report instrument |
dc.subject.proposal | Psychometric property |
dc.subject.spines | Programación de computadores |
dc.subject.spines | Computer programming |
dc.subject.unesco | Método de enseñanza |
dc.subject.unesco | Teaching methods |
dc.title.translated | Design and internal validation of a self-report instrument to characterize computer programming learning strategies |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa |
dc.type.content | Text |
dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
Archivos en el documento
Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
![Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional](/themes/Mirage2//images/creativecommons/cc-generic.png)