Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorHerrera Jiménez, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Jimenez, Michelle
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T14:57:57Z
dc.date.available2021-09-08T14:57:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80133
dc.descriptionIlustraciones
dc.description.abstractEn el presente estudio se recopilan las principales asimetrías de la información y sus causas en la etapa preliminar de los proyectos de edificaciones, mediante un estudio de caso cualitativo a una empresa constructora del sector privado, con el fin de proponer alternativas para su gestión y contribuir con el cumplimiento de los objetivos de costo, plazo y calidad. Además, contribuir a la percepción de servicio al cliente de la empresa, que es uno de los principales indicadores en su gestión de proyectos, pero que se ve afectado por los atrasos, la calidad y la pérdida de utilidad que generan la selección adversa y el riesgo moral en las diversas fases. Bajo la mirada de la teoría de la agencia se formuló un instrumento de entrevista cualitativa, dirigido a los gerentes de proyectos de la empresa, que se consideran intermediarios fundamentales entre los agentes externos y los proyectos de la empresa, con lo cual se recopilaron las principales asimetrías de la información, que generalmente se presentan en la etapa preliminar de los proyectos de edificaciones y en el proceso de negociación y validación de señales para la selección de los agentes externos. Así mismo, se propone una guía que contribuya al manejo de asimetrías y mitigue sus efectos. Con el adecuado manejo de señales en el proceso preliminar de las obras, que incluye la validación de la experiencia y capacidad de los agentes externos y la implementación de buenas prácticas, como el juicio de expertos y la revisión de lecciones aprendidas, se puede minimizar el problema de selección adversa en la etapa de inicio y de riesgo moral en la etapa de ejecución; adicionalmente, lograr el óptimo cumplimiento de los objetivos empresariales y de los proyectos de edificaciones. (Texto tomado de la fuente).
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the main asymmetries of information in the preliminary stage of building projects are collected; as well as their causes. A qualitative case study of a construction company in the private sector is conducted to propose alternatives for their management strategies and contribute to the fulfillment of cost, time, and quality objectives. In addition, this study aims to improve the perception of the company's customer service, which is one of the main indicators of its project management performance. However, the image of customer service is affected by circumstances, such as delays, quality and loss of profit. These conditions are generated by adverse selection and moral hazard in the different phases of a project. Under the gaze of agency theory, a qualitative interview focused on the company’s project managers is to be formulated. Project managers are considered fundamental intermediaries between external agents and the company's projects, with whom the main information asymmetries lie. These asymmetries generally appear in the preliminary stage of building projects and in the process of negotiation and validation of signals for the selection of external agents. Likewise, a guide is proposed that contributes to the management of asymmetries and mitigates their effects. With the proper handling of signals in the preliminary process of construction projects the adverse selection problem in the initial stage and moral hazard in the execution stage can be minimized. Approaches to manage signals include the validation of the experience and capacity of the external agents; and the implementation of good practices, such as the application of experts’ judgment and review of learned lessons. In addition, it enables achieving optimal compliance with business objectives and building projects.
dc.format.extentx, 128 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc690 - Construcción de edificios
dc.titleAsimetrías de la información en el proceso de contratación de la etapa preliminar de los proyectos de edificaciones de una empresa constructora colombiana
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Administración
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Administración
dc.description.researchareaGestión de Proyectos
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Administración y Contaduría Pública
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAdeleke, A. Q., Bahaudin, A. Y., & Kamaruddeen, A. M. (2017). Organizational Internal Factors and Construction Risk Management among Nigerian Construction Companies. Global Business Review, 097215091667746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916677460
dc.relation.referencesAnumba, C. J., Baugh, C., & Khalfan, M. M. A. (2002). Organisational structures to support concurrent engineering in construction. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 102(5), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570210428294
dc.relation.referencesAkerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/1879431
dc.relation.referencesArtículo 2053, Código Civil. Naturaleza de la confeccion de una obra material. Artículo 2053 (CC) - Legislación colombiana 2019. (n.d.). Recuperado febrero 27, 2019, de http://leyes.co/codigo_civil/2053.htm
dc.relation.referencesBahamid, R. A., & Doh, S. I. (2017). A review of risk management process in construction projects of developing countries. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 271(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/271/1/012042
dc.relation.referencesBarney, J. B. (1986). Organizational Culture : Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? 11(3), 656-665. doi:10.2307/258317. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/258317
dc.relation.referencesBasel (2011). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document Operational Risk. Recuperado de https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs184.pdf
dc.relation.referencesBasilea (2004). Convergencia internacional de medidas y normas de capital. en Banco de Pagos Internacionales. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0250569X00016873
dc.relation.referencesBonilla Botía, G., & Buitrago Vargas, N. (2018). Informe de Productividad Sector Construcción de Edificaciones Camacol. Recuperado de https://camacol.co/sites/default/files/documentosinteres/INFORME PRODUCTIVIDAD VF.pdf
dc.relation.referencesBower, D., Ashby, G., Gerald, K., & Smyk, W. (2002). Incentive mechanisms for project success. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(1), 37-43. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2002)18:1(37)
dc.relation.referencesBryde, D. J., Unterhitzenberger, C., & Joby, R. (2019). Resolving agency issues in client–contractor relationships to deliver project success. Production Planning and Control, 30(13), 1049-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1557757
dc.relation.referencesCamacol (2020). Tendencias de la construcción Colombia. Tendencias de la construcción, 17, 1-48. Recuperado de https://camacol.co/sites/default/files/sala-prensa/TENDENCIAS ENERO 10 DE 2020.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCamacol, Cámara Colombiana de la Construcción, & McKinsey (2018). Medición de la eficiencia en la industria de la construcción y su relación con el capital de trabajo. Revista Ingeniería de Construcción, 33(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50732018000100069
dc.relation.referencesCamacol, & Sena. (2015). Proyecto de investigación del sector de la construcción de edificación en Colombia
dc.relation.referencesCampero, Q. M. (2013). Rol de los principios de administración de proyectos en el manejo de contratos de obras civiles. Revista Ingeniería de Construccion, 28(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.4067/SO718-50732013000100005
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, I. C. (2005). An Uncertainty-Based Framework To Support Decision-Making in Geotechnical Engineering Projects. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/an-uncertainty-based-framework-to-support-decision-making-in-geot
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, M., & Quintero, J. F. (2004). Determinantes de la actividad constructora en colombia. Fedesarrollo, (2003), 1-50
dc.relation.referencesCeric, A. (2014). Strategies for minimizing information asymmetries in construction projects: Project managers’ perceptions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(3), 424-440. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.720601
dc.relation.referencesCeric, A. (2014). Minimizing communication risk in construction: A Delphi study of the key role of project managers. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(6), 829-838. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802739
dc.relation.referencesCeric, A. (2012). Communication risk in contruction Projects: Application of principal-agent theory. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 4(2), 522-533. https://doi.org/10.5592/otmcj.2012.2.8
dc.relation.referencesCeric, A. (2013). The principal-agent theory and the role of project managers in construction: Guidelines for future research. Proceedings of the Joint CIB International Conference, Management of Construction: Research to Practice, 766-776. Recuperado de https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB_DC25687.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCheng, M. M., Schulz, A. K. D., & Booth, P. (2009). Knowledge transfer in project reviews: The effect of self-justification bias and moral hazard. Accounting and Finance, 49(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2008.00271.x
dc.relation.referencesChin, L. S., & Hamid, A. R. A. (2015). The practice of time management on construction project. Procedia Engineering, 125, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.006
dc.relation.referencesChung, D., & Hensher, D. (2015). Risk Management in Public-Private Partnerships. Australian Accounting Review, 25(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12062
dc.relation.referencesCifuentes, S., & Ibagon, M. (2016). Introducción a las asociaciones público-privadas en Colombia. Recuperado de https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=Y1i6DAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA10&dq=+“Introducción+a+las+asociaciones+público-privadas+en+Colombia”&ots=d15AB3_A6b&sig=xW9izrDVkhPgynOZmadAITG3x3s#v=onepage&q=“Introducción a las asociaciones público-privadas en Colom
dc.relation.referencesCoase, A. R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. 4, 1689–1699. http://www.jstor.com/stable/724810
dc.relation.referencesConlon, E. J., & McLean Parks, J. (1990). Effects of Monitoring and Tradition on Compensation Arrangements : An Experiment with Principal-Agent Dyads. The Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 603-622
dc.relation.referencesConlon, E. J., & McLean Parks, J. (1995). Compensation Contracts : Do Agency Theory Assumptions Predict Negotiated Agreements ? The Academy of Management, 38(3), 821-838. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/256747
dc.relation.referencesContraloría (2018). Fueron entregadas obras de mantenimiento al aeropuerto el embrujo de providencia. Recuperado de https://www.contraloria.gov.co/contraloria/sala-de-prensa/boletines-de-prensa/boletines-de-prensa-2018/-/asset_publisher/9IOzepbPkrRW/content/fueron-entregadas-obras-de-mantenimiento-al-aeropuerto-el-embrujo-de-providencia?inheritRedirect=false
dc.relation.referencesCRA, C. de R. de A. P. & S. B. (2006). Documento de trabajo. Recuperado de https://cra.gov.co/documents/DOCUMENTO_TRABAJO_TUBERIAS_Oct28_05.doc
dc.relation.referencesCrnković, D., & Vukomanović, M. (2016). Comparison Of Trends In Risk Management Theory And Practices Within The Construction Industry. Elektronički Časopis Građevinskog Fakulteta Osijek, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.13167/2016.13.1
dc.relation.referencesCuevas-Rodríguez, G., Gómez-Mejía, L. R., & Wiseman, R. M. (2012). Has Agency Theory Run its Course?: Making the Theory more Flexible to Inform the Management of Reward Systems. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 526-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12004
dc.relation.referencesDANE (2012). Clasificación industrial internacional uniforme de todas las actividades económicas. 496. Recuperado de https://www.dane.gov.co/files/nomenclaturas/CIIU_Rev4ac.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDas, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/259291
dc.relation.referencesDemirkesen, S., & Ozorhon, B. (2017). Impact of integration management on construction project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1639-1654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.09.008
dc.relation.referencesDemski, J. S., & Feltham, G. A. (1978). Economic Incentives in Budgetary Control Systems. The Accounting Review, 53(2), 336-359. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/245898
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadísticas, DANE (2020). Boletín Técnico. 1-30
dc.relation.referencesDess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., Eisner, A. B., Sacristán, P. M., Villarreal, P. C., Estañol, R. M., ... & Pérez, Y. D. M. V. (2011). Administración estratégica: textos y casos. McGraw-Hill
dc.relation.referencesDíaz Bautista, O. (2015). La información de las organizaciones un bien público. 1-34. Retrieved from http://www.unilibre.edu.co/bogota/pdfs/2016/4sin/B62.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDoloi, H., Sawhney, A., Iyer, K. C., & Rentala, S. (2012). Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 479-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Agency- and Institutional-Theory Explanations : The Case of Retail Sales Compensation. The Academy of Management, 31(3), 488-511
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/258191
dc.relation.referencesFalla Zúñiga, L. M. (2014). La responsabilidad civil de las agencias calificadoras de riesgo en Colombia. Revista de Derecho Privado, 52, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.15425/redepriv.52.2014.22
dc.relation.referencesFama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2) (Apr., 1980), pp. 288-307, 88(2), 288-307. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/1837292
dc.relation.referencesFama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 327–349. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/725105
dc.relation.referencesFasecolda :: Estadísticas del sector (2019). Recuperado en febrero 10, 2019, de http://www.fasecolda.com/index.php/fasecolda/estadisticas-del-sector/
dc.relation.referencesFasecolda :: Nosotros. (n.d.). Recuperado en mayo 11, 2018, de http://www.fasecolda.com/index.php/fasecolda/nosotros/
dc.relation.referencesFawcett, S. E., & Fawcett, S. A. (1995). The firm as a value‐added system. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25(5), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039510089695
dc.relation.referencesGao, S., & Zhang, Z. (2008). Opportunism and alliance risk factors in asymmetric alliances. Proceedings of 2008 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, IEEE/SOLI 2008, 1, 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2008.4686484
dc.relation.referencesGrossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1983). Implicit Contracts Under Asymmetric Information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1983), 123-156. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.or
dc.relation.referencesHarris, M., Kriebel, C. ., & Raviv, A. (1982). Asymmetric Information , Incentives and Intrafirm Resource Allocation. Journal: Management Science 28(6), 604–620. Recuperado de from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631044
dc.relation.referencesHarris, M., & Raviv, A. (1978). Some Results on Incentive Contracts with Applications to Education and Employment , Health Insurance , and Law Enforcement. American Economic Association Stable, 68(1), 20-30. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/1809684 Linked references are available on JST
dc.relation.referencesHaseeb, M., Lu, X., & Bibi, A. (2014). Construction safety management related dominant issues in the construction sector of Pakistan. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35548-6_81
dc.relation.referencesHaque, B. (2003). Problems in concurrent new product development: An in-depth comparative study of three companies. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060310463154
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6th ed., vol. 91). Recuperado de http://observatorio.epacartagena.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/metodologia-de-la-investigacion-sexta-edicion.compressed.pdf
dc.relation.referencesHillson, D. (2003). Using a Risk Breakdown Structure in project management. Journal of Facilities Management, 2(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960410808131
dc.relation.referencesHolmstrom, B. (1979). Moral Hazard and Observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
dc.relation.referencesIcontec (2011). Norma Técnica Colombiana NTC-ISO 31000. Icontec, (571), 34. Recuperado de https://sitios.ces.edu.co/Documentos/NTC-ISO31000_Gestion_del_riesgo.pdf
dc.relation.referencesJensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-XJin, X., Zhang, G., Liu, J., Feng, Y., & Zuo, J. (2017). Major Participants in the Construction Industry and Their Approaches to Risks: A Theoretical Framework. Procedia Engineering, 182, 314-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.100
dc.relation.referencesJoblot, L., Paviot, T., Deneux, D., & Lamouri, S. (2017). Literature review of Building Information Modeling (BIM) intended for the purpose of renovation projects. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 10518-10525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1298
dc.relation.referencesKeil, M., Jeff Smith, H., Pawlowski, S., & Jin, L. (2004). ‘Why Didn’t Somebody Tell Me?: Climate, Information Asymmetry, and Bad News About Troubled Projects. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 35(2), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/1007965.1007971
dc.relation.referencesLambert, R. A. (1983). Long-Term Contracts and Moral Hazard. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(2), 441-452. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/3003645
dc.relation.referencesLedesma Agudelo, j. A., ochoa almanza, n., lopez cleves, m. A., & perez calderón, r. A. (2013). Propuesta de mejoramiento de la cadena de valor de inversiones alcabama s.a con enfoque en el proceso de compras como un pilar de la misma
dc.relation.referencesLove, P. E. D., Gunasekaran, A., & Li, H. (1998). Concurrent engineering: A strategy for procuring construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 16(6), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00066-5
dc.relation.referencesLozano Serna, S., Patiño Galindo, I., Gómez Cabrera, A., & Torres, A. (2018). Identificación de factores que generan diferencias de tiempo y costos en proyectos de construcción en Colombia. Ingeniería y Ciencia, 14(27), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.17230/ingciencia.14.27.6
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, G., Moreno, B., & Rubio, M. C. (2012). Gestión del riesgo en proyectos de ingeniería. El caso del campus universitario Pts. Universidad de Granada (España) Risk. DYNA (Colombia), 79(173 PART I), 7-14. Recuperado de http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84862871016&partnerID=40&md5=667ed29899c727f0f27b48b2685aec15
dc.relation.referencesMemon, A. H., & Rahman, I. A. (2014). SEM-PLS analysis of inhibiting factors of cost performance for large construction projects in malaysia: Perspective of clients and consultants. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/165158
dc.relation.referencesMercado Villalba, A. (2019). Riesgo moral en la garantía de cumplimiento colombiana. 1-43. Fuente: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/view/7089/9635
dc.relation.referencesMissbauer, H., & Hauber, W. (2006). Bid calculation for construction projects: Regulations and incentive effects of unit price contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(3), 1005-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.014
dc.relation.referencesMüller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2005). The impact of principal-agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager. International Journal of Project Management, 23(5 SPEC. ISS.), 398-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.03.001
dc.relation.referencesNorth, D. (1984). Transaction Costs , Institutions , and Economic History Author ( s ): Douglass C . North Source : Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft / Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , Bd . 140 , H . 1 ., The New Institutional Economics : A. März 1984, 7–17
dc.relation.referencesNorth, D. C., & Wallis, J. J. (1994). Integrating Institutional Change and Technical Change in Economic History A Transaction Cost Approach. 150(4), 609–624
dc.relation.referencesOlatunji, O. A. (2008). A comparative analysis of tender sums and final costs of public construction and supply projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 13(1), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/13664380810882084
dc.relation.referencesOlivera, M. (2008). Sobre teoría de juegos, proceso presupuestal y situación fiscal. Recuperado de https://www.repository.fedesarrollo.org.co/handle/11445/891
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Fuente: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962
dc.relation.referencesPeris-Ortiz, M., Rueda-Armengot, C., De Souza Rech, C., & Pérez Montiel, M. (2012). Fundamentos de la teoría organizativa de agencia. Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de Economía, (865), 107-118
dc.relation.referencesPMI. (2007). Construction Extension to the PMBOK Guide. In Project Management Institute. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj
dc.relation.referencesProject Management Institute PMI. (2017). Guía de los fundamentos para la dirección de proyectos (guía del PMBOK®)
dc.relation.referencesPorter, M. E. (1991). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy Author. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95–117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486436
dc.relation.referencesPorter M.E. (1980)“Competitive Strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors” The Free Press 1980 Editorial Free Pr, ISBN, 13, 9780029253601
dc.relation.referencesRojas Sarmiento, A. J., & Rincón González, C. (2020). Analysis of the Impact of the Construction Sector on the Colombian Economy. (Julio), 7-10. Fuente: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-921X2020000400109
dc.relation.referencesSafa, M., Sabet, A., Macgillivray, S., Davidson, M., Kaczmarczyk, K., Haas, C. T., … Rayside, D. (2015). Classification of Construction Projects. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(6), 625-633. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280102672_Classification_of_Construction_Projects
dc.relation.referencesSchieg, M. (2008). Strategies for avoiding asymmetric information in construction project management. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(1), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.47-51
dc.relation.referencesSchieg, M. (2010). Risk management in construction project management. 1699(May), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/16111699.2006.9636126. Fuente: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330517866_Risk_management_in_construction_project_management
dc.relation.referencesSerpell, A., Ferrada, X., & Rubio, N. L. (2017). Fostering the effective usage of risk management in construction. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(7), 858-867. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1321578
dc.relation.referencesSerpella, A. F., Ferrada, X., Howard, R., & Rubio, L. (2014). Risk Management in Construction Projects: A Knowledge-based Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 653-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.03.073
dc.relation.referencesShavell, S. (1979). Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003319
dc.relation.referencesShehu, Z., Endut, I. R., & Akintoye, A. (2014). Factors contributing to project time and hence cost overrun in the Malaysian construction industry. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 19(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-04-2013-0009
dc.relation.referencesShrestha, A., Tamošaitiene, J., Martek, I., Hosseini, M. R., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). A principal-agent theory perspective on PPP risk allocation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(22), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226455
dc.relation.referencesSimister, S., & Turner, R. (2017). Standard forms of contract. In Contracting for Project Management. Recuperado de https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85072857157&partnerID=40&md5=fe4aa33b031fa069c4adedeed7c8c906
dc.relation.referencesSpence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling Published by : Oxford University Press. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374
dc.relation.referencesStanley, E. F. and Stanley, A. F. (1995) “The firm as a value-added system; integrating logistics, operations and purchasing”.International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management Vol 25 No 5 24-42 (Fawcett & Fawcett, 1995)
dc.relation.referencesStiglitz, J. E. (1975). Incentives, Risk , and Information: Notes Towards a Theory of Hierarchy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 6(2), 552. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003243
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. En Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada
dc.relation.referencesSymon, G., & Cassell, C. (2012). Qualitative organizational research. Fuente: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-organizational-research/book235422
dc.relation.referencesSzymański, P. (2017). Risk management in construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 208, 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036
dc.relation.referencesTang, Y., Chen, Y., Hua, Y., & Fu, Y. (2020). Impacts of risk allocation on conflict negotiation costs in construction projects: Does managerial control matter? International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), 188-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.03.002
dc.relation.referencesTaroun, A. (2011). Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence: Potential usage for decision making and risk analysis in construction project management. The Built & Human Environment Review, 4(1), 155-166. Recuperado de http://www.tbher.org/index.php/tbher/article/view/51
dc.relation.referencesVélez Ortiz, S. M. (2018). Estudio de caso: Concesión vial Cartagena-Barranquilla y Circunvalar de la Prosperidad. Análisis de política pública. 173-207. Revista de Derecho y Economía, No, 49. Recuperado de https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/contxto49&div=11&id=&page=
dc.relation.referencesWalker, G., & Weber, D. (1984). A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 373-391. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393030
dc.relation.referencesWang, W., Zhao, J., Zhang, W., & Wang, Y. (2015). Conceptual Framework for Risk Propensity , Risk Perception , and Risk Behaviour of Construction Project Managers. Recuperado de https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Conceptual-Framework-for-Risk-Propensity-%2C-Risk-%2C-Wang-Zhao/6ccc06ff8fece71d1da8b760e726ef4e86a4a618
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, O. E. (1979). Assessing Vertical Market Restrictions: Antitrust Ramifications of the Transaction Cost Approach. 127(4), 953-993
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization : The Transaction Cost Approach Author ( s ): Oliver E . Williamson Published by : The University of Chicago Press Stable URL : https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778934 All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Economi. 87(3), 548–577
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, O. E. (1985). Reflections on the New Institutional Economics. May, 187–195. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40750794
dc.relation.referencesXiang, P., Huo, X., & Shen, L. (2015). Research on the phenomenon of asymmetric information in construction projects - The case of China. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 589-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.007
dc.relation.referencesXiang, P., & Song, X. (2015). Preventing Adverse Selection Risk of Construction Project Based on Signaling. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 8(1), 439-443. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801408010439
dc.relation.referencesXiang, P., Zhou, J., Zhou, X., & Ye, K. (2016). Construction Project Risk Management Based on the View of Asymmetric Construction Project Risk Management Based on the View of Asymmetric Information. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO
dc.relation.referencesYang, K., Zhao, R., & Lan, Y. (2016). Impacts of uncertain project duration and asymmetric risk sensitivity information in project management. International Transactions in Operational Research, 23(4), 749-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12156
dc.relation.referencesYildiz, A. E., Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, M. T. (2014). Using Expert Opinion for Risk Assessment: A Case Study of a Construction Project Utilizing a Risk Mapping Tool. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 519-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.058
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9e
dc.relation.referencesZhang, L., & Li, F. (2014). Risk/reward compensation model for integrated project delivery. Engineering Economics, 25(5), 558-567. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.25.5.3733
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembProject management
dc.subject.lembAdministración de proyectos
dc.subject.lembConstruction industry
dc.subject.lembIndustria de la construcción
dc.subject.lembHousing projects
dc.subject.lembProyectos de vivienda
dc.subject.proposalAsimetrías de la información
dc.subject.proposalProyectos de edificaciones
dc.subject.proposalTeoría de la agencia
dc.subject.proposalSelección adversa
dc.subject.proposalRiesgo moral
dc.subject.proposalGestión de riesgos
dc.subject.proposalInformation asymmetries
dc.subject.proposalBuilding projects
dc.subject.proposalAgency theory
dc.subject.proposalAdverse selection
dc.subject.proposalMoral hazard
dc.subject.proposalRisk management
dc.title.translatedInformation asymmetries in the contracting process of the preliminary stage of a Colombian construction company building projects
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito