Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorCorrea Ospina, Martha Liliana
dc.contributor.advisorDiaz Pinzón, Beatriz Helena
dc.contributor.authorCeballos Martínez, Germán Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T16:43:13Z
dc.date.available2021-09-08T16:43:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-18
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80135
dc.descriptionIlustraciones
dc.description.abstractSMEs represent a relevant sector in the Colombian economy; however, their lack of competitiveness has reduced their level of success. One of the factors that have been detected in the face of these competitiveness problems has been the lack of technology that supports their business processes and leverages decision making, this largely originated by the limited budgets they have and the perception of needing large investments when acquiring information systems. This paper explored and compared the traditional infrastructure, Cloud Computing and Grid Computing, based on the factors that should be considered to conduct a study of the total cost of ownership to determine which options may be viable for Bogota's SMEs in the textile sector. Likewise, six interviews were made to SMEs of the textile sector in Bogota to contrast the information systems, their investment in technology, type of infrastructure and the way they manage technology-related costs in such a way that they could be compared against the factors investigated in the literature. According to the research carried out, the differentials that were found in terms of expense attributes between On premise infrastructure, Grid and Cloud Computing, are mostly part of investment expenses where the attributes that must be taken into account for the infrastructure are more numerous. On premise and the Grid compared to Cloud Computing, due to these investment expenses, SMEs tend to direct their decisions towards Cloud technology.
dc.description.abstractLas Pymes representan un sector relevante en la economía de Colombia, sin embargo, su falta de competitividad ha hecho que el nivel de éxito de estas se vea reducido. Uno de los factores que se han detectado de cara a estos problemas de competitividad ha sido la falta de tecnología que soporta sus procesos de negocio y apalancan la toma de decisiones, esto originado en gran parte por los presupuestos limitados que se tienen y a la percepción de necesitar inversiones grandes al momento de adquirir tecnologías de información. En este trabajo se examinaron y se compararon la infraestructura física (On premise), el Cloud Computing y el Grid Computing, tomando como base los factores que se deben tener en cuenta de cara a realizar un estudio del costo total de propiedad con el fin de explorar qué opciones pueden ser viables para las Pymes bogotanas del sector textil. De igual manera se realizaron entrevistas a seis Pymes del sector textil de Bogotá con el fin de contrastar su inversión en tecnología, tipo de infraestructura y la forma como administran los costos relacionados con tecnología de forma tal que se pudiera comparar contra los factores encontrados en la literatura. De acuerdo con la investigación realizada los diferenciales que se encontraron en cuanto a atributos de gastos entre infraestructura física, Grid y Cloud Computing en su mayoría hacen parte de los gastos de inversión donde son más numerosos los atributos que se deben tener en cuenta para la infraestructura física y el Grid comparando con el Cloud Computing, debido a estos gastos de inversión las Pymes suelen direccionar sus decisiones hacía la tecnología Cloud. (Texto tomado de la fuente).
dc.format.extentxv, 99 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales
dc.subject.otherComputación en malla
dc.subject.otherComputación en la nube
dc.titleEstudio comparativo del costo total de propiedad entre cloud, grid computing e infraestructura física en pymes de Bogotá del sector textil
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Administración
dc.description.notesIncluye anexos
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones - GISTIC
dc.coverage.cityBogotá
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Administración
dc.description.researchareaSistemas y tecnologías de información en las organizaciones
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Administración y Contaduría Pública
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesAbramson, D., Buyya, R., & Giddy, J. (2002). A computational economy for grid computing and its implementation in the Nimrod-G resource broker. Future Generation Computer Systems, 18(8), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X(02)00085-7
dc.relation.referencesAcopi. (2018). ACOPI logra una Comisión Accidental Mipyme dentro. 1–9.
dc.relation.referencesAkkermans, H. A., & Van der Horst, H. (2002). Managing it infrastructure standardisation in the networked manufacturing firm. International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1–2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00201-8
dc.relation.referencesAli, N. (2018). A Comparison between Cluster, Grid, and Cloud Computing. International Journal of Computer Applications, 179(32), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2018916732
dc.relation.referencesArmbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., & Zaharia, M. (2010). A view of cloud computing. 53(4), 50–58.
dc.relation.referencesBarney, J. (1991). firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.
dc.relation.referencesBeltran, A. (2006). Los 20 problemas de la pequeña y mediana empresa.
dc.relation.referencesBliedy, D., Mazen, S., & Ezzat, E. (2018). Datacenter Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Models : A Survey. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Applications, 8(2/3/4), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsea.2018.8404
dc.relation.referencesButhelezi, M. E., Adigun, M. O., Ekabua, O. O., & Iyilade, J. S. (2008). Accounting, pricing and charging service models for a GUISET grid-based service provisioning environment. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on E-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government, EEE 2008, March 2014, 350–355.
dc.relation.referencesCastro, F., Devis, L., & Olivera, M. (2011). Impacto de las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (TIC) en el Desarrollo y la Competitividad del País. Fedesarrollo, 225. http://www.repository.fedesarrollo.org.co/handle/11445/180
dc.relation.referencesChauhan, S., Raman, A., & Singh, N. P. (2013). A Comparative Cost Analysis of on Premises IT Infrastructure and Cloud-Based Email Services in an Indian Business School. 3(June), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcac.2013040103
dc.relation.referencesCode, R., Date, P., & Dawson, K. (2013). The Total Cost of Ownership of Cloud and Premise ­ Based Contact Center Systems. 1–22.
dc.relation.referencesCustomers, M. (2011). The Total Economic Impact Of Microsoft Office 365 Midsize Customers. June.
dc.relation.referencesDembla, V., Chaudhari, R., Joglekar, B., & Chhabra, S. (2018). Implementation of Grid System over Li-Fi Network. Proceedings - 2018 4th International Conference on Computing, Communication Control and Automation, ICCUBEA 2018, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCUBEA.2018.8697429
dc.relation.referencesDittner, R., Rule, D., Majors, K., Ten Seldam, M., Grotenhuis, T., & Green, G. (2006). Virtualization with Microsoft Virtual Server 2005. In Virtualization with Microsoft Virtual Server 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-59749-106-8.x5000-2
dc.relation.referencesDuncan, N. B. (2016). Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518080
dc.relation.referencesFedesarrollo, & CCIT. (2013). El papel de las TIC en el desarrollo de la pequeña empresa: reflexiones de política a la luz del caso colombiano. Coyuntura TIC, 1–35.
dc.relation.referencesFeoktistov, A., Gorsky, S., Sidorov, I., Kostromin, R., Edelev, A., & Massel, L. (2019). Orlando tools: Energy research application development through convergence of grid and cloud computing. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 965). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05807-4_25
dc.relation.referencesFeria, J., & Nunn, S. (2006). ( 12 ) United States Patent. 1(12).
dc.relation.referencesFisher, C. (2018). Cloud versus On-Premise Computing. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 08(09), 1991–2006. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2018.89133
dc.relation.referencesFoster, I. (2002). What is the grid? a three point checklist, {July} 2002. ThreePoint-Check. Pdf, January 2002.
dc.relation.referencesFoster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., & Lu, S. (2014). Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared.
dc.relation.referencesGrot, B. (2012). O Ptimizing D Ata -C Enter Tco With S Cale -O Ut P Rocessors Introduced Processors Based on Low - Power Cores Can Improve Both on - Chip Computing Density To Deliver the Highest Performance Per Tco and. 52–63.
dc.relation.referencesGuharoy, R., Sur, S., Rakshit, S., Kumar, S., Ahmed, A., Chakborty, S., Dutta, S., & Srivastava, M. (2017). A theoretical and detail approach on grid computing a review on grid computing applications. 2017 8th Industrial Automation and Electromechanical Engineering Conference, IEMECON 2017, 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMECON.2017.8079578
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, L., Callaghan, C., Balasubramanian, M., Haq, H., & Spallek, H. (2019). Cost Comparison of an On-Premise IT Solution with a Cloud-Based Solution for Electronic Health Records in a Dental School Clinic. Journal of Dental Education, 83(8), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.21815/jde.019.089
dc.relation.referencesJuhasz, Z. (2020). Quantitative cost comparison of on-premise and cloud infrastructure based EEG data processing. Cluster Computing, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03141-y
dc.relation.referencesKamoun, F. (2009). Virtualizing the Datacenter Without Compromising Server Performance By Faouzi Kamoun College of Information Technology , University of Dubai. ACM Ubiquity, 2009(9).
dc.relation.referencesKesselman, C., & Foster, I. (2004). Preface to the second edition. Molecular Diagnostics of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110278927
dc.relation.referencesKoomey, J., Brill, K., Turner, P., Stanley, J., & Taylor, B. (2008). A Simple Model for Determining True Total Cost of Ownership for Data Centers. Uptime Institute, Llc, 2.1(March), 1–9.
dc.relation.referencesLynn, T., Mooney, J. G., Rosati, P., & Fox, G. (2020). The Business Value of Cloud Computing.
dc.relation.referencesMell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST-National Institute of Standars and Technology- Definition of Cloud Computing. NIST Special Publication 800-145, 7.
dc.relation.referencesMieritz, L., & Kirwin, B. (2005). Defining Gartner Total Cost of Ownership. Gartner Research, December, 1–11.
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J. (2006). A critique of statistical modelling in management science from a critical realist perspective: Its role within multimethodology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601980
dc.relation.referencesMontoya, A., Montoya, I., & Castellanos, O. (2010). Situación de la competitividad de las Pyme en Colombia elementos actuales y retos. Agronomía Colombiana, 28(1), 107–117.
dc.relation.referencesNazir, A., & Sørensen, S. A. (2010). Cost-benefit analysis of high performance computing infrastructures. Proceedings - 2010 IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications, SOCA 2010, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCA.2010.5707134
dc.relation.referencesOpitz, A., König, H., & Szamlewska, S. (2008). What does grid computing cost? Journal of Grid Computing, 6(4), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-008-9098-8
dc.relation.referencesPadhi, N. (2018). Should Manufacturing Applications be hosted on Cloud. Researchgate.Net, November. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nikhil_Padhi/publication/328725538_Should_Manufacturing_Applications_be_hosted_on_Cloud/links/5bdde3264585150b2b9d3afe/Should-Manufacturing-Applications-be-hosted-on-Cloud.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPatel, A., Seyfi, A., Tew, Y., & Jaradat, A. (2011). Comparative study and review of grid, cloud, utility computing and software as a service for use by libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 28(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/07419051111145145
dc.relation.referencesRasmussen, N. (2011). Determining Total Cost of Ownership for Data Center and Network Room Infrastructure. White Paper. http://apcpartnercentral.com/assets/2012/07/CMRP-5T9PQG_R4_EN.pdf
dc.relation.referencesTalukder, A. K., Zimmerman, L., & Prahalad, H. A. (2010). Cloud Economics : Principles , Costs , and Benefits. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-241-4
dc.relation.referencesVMware Inc. (2006). Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software. Vmware, 18. https://www.vmware.com/pdf/TCO.pdf
dc.relation.referencesWeill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.4.307
dc.relation.referencesXu, X. (2012). From cloud computing to cloud manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 28(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2011.07.002
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembInformation networks
dc.subject.lembSistemas de información
dc.subject.lembTextile industry
dc.subject.lembIndustria textil
dc.subject.proposalInfraestructura física
dc.subject.proposalCloud computing
dc.subject.proposalGrid computing
dc.subject.proposalCosto total de propiedad
dc.subject.proposalTotal cost of ownership (TCO)
dc.title.translatedTotal cost of ownership comparative study between cloud, grid computing and on premise infraestructure on Bogota’s SMEs textile sector
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito