Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.contributor.advisorHernández Romero, Daira
dc.contributor.authorNorato Chávez, Maria Angélica
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-21T23:05:56Z
dc.date.available2023-06-21T23:05:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84047
dc.descriptionilustraciones, fotografías
dc.description.abstractThis research is about how design education and design thinking can support the development of agency in children aged 10 and 11 in primary education. As part of the theoretical background, the literature review first provides information about design, design skills, design thinking, design as a human activity, and key elements within design education. Secondly, it explains information about agency, how it is developed, and the different dimensions and components. This is a research through design, which means that the design is both the subject and object of the research, where the design itself, in this case an educational service, is the instrument of research. In terms of methodological and scientific rigor, action research is used. The aim of this type of research is to improve the design practice starting from the educational context of the research itself, primary. As a design teacher, in this case in primary school, I have seen the benefits of design education in an early stage of human development, and the ways students make sense of our artificial world while acquiring lifelong design skills. Nevertheless, the benefits of this approach within a curriculum are not offered, nor documented, as often as one would prefer. Therefore, my interest is to open this door to discussion, development and improvement of our practice as designers and design educators. This research was conducted in the primary section of a Colombian international school with fourth grade students and teachers. Through participatory methods and co-design, we developed toolkits to guide the students on the development of the PYPx (Primary Years Programme Exhibition: Student led final project of the primary program). By the inclusion of design thinking and design education methods, we focused on the agency development of the students throughout all stages of their project.(Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractEsta investigación trata de cómo la educación en diseño puede apoyar el desarrollo de la agencia en niños de 10 y 11 años en la educación primaria. Como parte de los antecedentes teóricos, la revisión de la literatura propor- ciona, en primer lugar, información sobre el diseño, las habilidades de diseño, el pensamiento de diseño y el diseño como actividad humana, elementos clave dentro de la educación del diseño; en segundo lugar, información sobre la agencia, cómo se desarrolla, las diferentes dimensiones y componentes de la agencia humana. Se trata de una investigación a través del diseño, lo que significa que el diseño es sujeto y objeto de la investigación, donde el propio diseño, en este caso un servicio educativo, es el instrumento de investigación. En cuanto al rigor metodológico y científico, se utiliza la investigación-acción. El objetivo de este tipo de investigación es mejorar la práctica del diseño. Como profesora de diseño, en este caso en la escuela primaria, he visto los ben- eficios de la enseñanza del diseño en una etapa temprana del desarrollo humano, la forma en que los estudiantes dan sentido a nuestro mundo artificial mientras adquieren habilidades de diseño para toda la vida. Sin embargo, los beneficios de este enfoque dentro de un plan de estudios no se ofrecen ni se documentan con la frecuencia que uno preferiría. Por lo tanto, mi interés es abrir esta puerta a la discusión, el desarrollo y la mejora de nuestra práctica como diseñadores y edu- cadores de diseño. Esta investigación se llevó a cabo en un colegio internacional colombiano, en la sección de primaria con estudiantes y profesores de cuarto grado. A través de mét- odos participativos y de co-diseño se desarrollaron kits de herramientas para guiar a los estudiantes en el desarrollo del PYPx (Exhibición del Programa de Escuela Pri- maria: Proyecto final del programa de primaria dirigido por los estudiantes). Medi- ante la inclusión de métodos de diseño y educación del diseño centrados en el desarrollo de la agencia de los estudiantes a lo largo de las etapas del proyecto.
dc.format.extent201 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc370 - Educación::372 - Educación primaria
dc.titleDesign Education for Agency Development in children aged 10-11
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Artes - Maestría en Diseño
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.methodsDesign research aims to focus on the design phenomenon. Whether it is to construct a solid theoretical framework or to understand and explain what design is through intellectual, experiential and experimental activities. The objects of study within design research have corresponding sectors driving the research. These are, the design discipline driven by the academy, the design user driven by sociology or philosophy and the design product driven by industry (Herrera, 2010). There are three main types of research in design, research about design, research for design and research through design, being this last one selected for the development of this thesis.
dc.description.researchareaDesign thinking and cognition
dc.description.technicalinfoContents 1. Research Approach 2. State of the art 3. Research methodology 4. Reference framework 5. The proposal 6. Study results and analysis 7. Conclusions and Recommendations 8. References 9. Annexes
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Administración
dc.publisher.placeBogotá,Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesARRANZ, M. (2013). COMPRENDER LA NATURALEZA: DOCTRINA ARISTOT LICA DE LAS CAUSAS. Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía, 40, 57-69.
dc.relation.referencesAustralian Curriculum. (n.d.). Design and Technologies Aims. Australian Curric- ulum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/ design-and-technologies/aims/
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (Ed.). (1997). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (2001). SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY: An Agentic Perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://www.academia.edu/33975677/Bandura?bulk- Download=thisPaper-topRelated-sameAuthor-citingThis-citedByThis-secon- dOrderCitations&from=cover_page.
dc.relation.referencesBecome an IB World School. (n.d.). International Baccalaureate. Retrieved Sep- tember 22, 2021, from https://www.ibo.org/become-an-ib-school/
dc.relation.referencesBonsiepe, G. (1992). Las 7 columnas del diseño.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7. cloudfront.net/62206916/Design_Thinking_por_Tim_Brown_Septiembre20200226- 88457-1bayaa7-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1664676192&Signature=OTyz- jH~zlZzbVNyotqEjUjWFP6blXjvH2xuTa~LzzQzMwhr8usjAkVWTVQujTnSiZ5kZ8kdJuY- 65bAakmtJ8if7u-tUuw-
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1992, Spring). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, The MIT Press, 8(2), 5-21.
dc.relation.referencesCambridge Assessment. (n.d.). Our standards. Cambridge Assessment Inter- national Education. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/about-us/ our-standards/
dc.relation.referencesCentro de investigación en pólizas de salud de UCLA Health DATA. (n.d.). APÉNDICE D: CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS EN INVESTIGACIONES CON SERES HUMANOS. https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/. https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/pro- grams/health-data-espanol/Documents/apendice_D_elaborando.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCOBIS. (2020). COBIS Patron’s Accreditation and Compliance Standards. https:// resources.finalsite.net/images/v1601543805/cobis/oombo4s2u1tk4ooktnzv/ COBISRevisedStandards2020.pdf
dc.relation.referencesColegio Anglo Colombiano. (2018, December 5). Anglo PYP Exhibition 2022 - 23. Anglo PYPx. Retrieved January 15, 2021, from https://sites.google.com/anglo. edu.co/anglo-pypx/home?authuser=0
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de Colombia. (n.d.). Leyes desde 1992 - Vigencia expresa y con- trol de constitucionalidad [LEY_0115_1994]. Secretaria del Senado. Retrieved October 3, 2021, from http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ ley_0115_1994.html
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (1992). Design Ability. N O R D I S K A R K I T E K T U R F O R S K N I N G, 4, 19-25.
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer-Verlag London.
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (2006). Intrinsic Value of Design Education. In DesignerlyWays of Know- ing (pp. 10-12). Springer Science+Business Media.
dc.relation.referencesDesign Council. (n.d.). The Double Diamond: 15 years on. Designcouncil.org. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/double-diamond-15-years
dc.relation.referencesDewey, J. (1917). The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy [Creative Intelligence: Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude]. In Project Gutenberg. http://www.thehanged- man.com/teaching-files/american/Dewey-Recovery.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2004, 09 02-03). LEVELS OF EXPERTISE IN DESIGN EDUCATION [INTERNA- TIONAL ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION CONFERENCE]. DELFT.
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2010, 01). The Nature of Design Thinking (Issue Conference Proceed- ing). DTRS8 Interpreting Design Thinking: Design Thinking Research Symposium Proceedings.
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2015). Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesEmbedding Values and Attitudes in Curriculum: Shaping a Better Future. (2018, December 5). OECD. Retrieved June 10, 2022, from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/ education/embedding-values-and-attitudes-in-curriculum_5d94796e-en#page3
dc.relation.referencesFletcher-Watson, S., De Jaegher, H., van Dijk, J., Frauenberger, C., Magnée, M., & Ye, J. (2018, Sep-Oct). Diversity Computing. INT ER ACT IONS, 29-33. 10.1145/3243461
dc.relation.referencesFrayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1-5. https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/384/3/frayling_research_in_ art_and_design_1993.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, K. (2017). Conversation, Discourse, and Knowledge. she ji The Jour- nal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sheji.2017.10.001
dc.relation.referencesHerrera, M. Á. (2010). Investigación y diseño: reflexiones y consideraciones con respecto al estado de la investigación actual en diseño. Universidad Interna- cional de la Rioja. https://www.nosolousabilidad.com/articulos/investigacion_ diseno.htm
dc.relation.referencesHILLNER, M. (2018). DESIGN THINKING — A BUZZWORD OR THE HOLY GRAIL OF DESIGN? [INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION]. DYSON SCHOOL OF DESIGN ENGINEERING, IMPERIAL COL- LEGE, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM. http://radar.gsa.ac.uk/6652/1/EPDE18_Final_ Paper_No1185_hillner.pdf
dc.relation.referencesIB. (n.d.). La exposición. ib.org. https://resources.ibo.org/pyp/works/pyp_1116 2-51463?root=1.6.2.10.5.3&lang=en&alang=es
dc.relation.referencesInternational Baccalaureate. (n.d.). The Learner. ib.org. Retrieved July 20, 2022, from https://resources.ibo.org/pyp/videos/pyp-the-learner-2018?
dc.relation.referencesInternational Baccalaureate. (2018, December 5). The learner. ib.org. Retrieved September 25, 2022, from https://resources.ibo.org/data/the-learner_fc17a71a- 2344-4b26-84cb-caca3a02750d/the-learner-en_d32875a1-8611-4de3-9f7d- 14a22127adc2.pdf
dc.relation.referencesInternational Baccalaureate Organization (UK) Ltd. (2019, noviembre). ¿Qué es la educación del IB? 3-17. https://www.ibo.org/globalassets/what-is-an-ib- education-es.pdf
dc.relation.referencesInternational School Accreditation Agencies | CIS Accreditation. (n.d.). Coun- cil of International Schools. Retrieved September 22, 2021, from https://www. cois.org/for-schools/international-accreditation
dc.relation.referencesIrbīte, A., & Strode, A. (2016). DESIGN THINKING MODELS IN DESIGN RESEARCH AND EDUCATION [SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION, Proceedings of the Inter- national Scientific Conference]. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol4.1584
dc.relation.referencesKimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II. Design and Culture, 4(2), 129-148. 10.2752/175470812X13281948975413
dc.relation.referencesKrokfors, L., Kangas, M., Kopisto, K., Rikabi-Sukkari, L., Salo, L., & Vesterinen, O. (2015). Learning Creatively Together. Educational Change Report 2016. Depart- ment of Teacher Education, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, University of Hel- sinki. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2015091011502.
dc.relation.referencesLages, L., Ricard, A., Hemonnet-Goujot, A., & Guerin, A.-M. (2020). Frameworks for innovation, collaboration, and change: Value creation wheel, design think- ing, creative problem‐solving, and lean. Research Gate. DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2321
dc.relation.referencesLawson, B. (2006). How designers think: the design process demystified. Archi- tectural Press.
dc.relation.referencesLearner Agency. (2018, December 5). Ib.org. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from https:// resources.ibo.org/pyp/works/pyp_11162-51463?lang=en
dc.relation.referencesLey 115 de Febrero 8 de 1994. (1994). In EL CONGRESO DE LA REPÚBLICA DE COLOMBIA (Ed.), Ley general de educación (pp. 1-50). EL CONGRESO DE LA REPÚBLICA DE COLOMBIA.
dc.relation.referencesLuka, I. (2014). Design Thinking in Pedagogy. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2, 63-74. DOI: 10.15503/jecs20142.63.74
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation (R. Coad, Trans.). MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesMettas, A. (2011). Design decision-making by children aged 12-15 within design and technology education. Loughborough University. Thesis. https://hdl.han- dle.net/2134/9251
dc.relation.referencesMineducacion. (n.d.). Estándares Básicos de competencia. Mineducacion. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/Preescolar-basica-y-media/ Referentes-de-calidad/340021:Estandares-Basicos-de-competencia
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional de Colombia. (n.d.). Cumbre mun- dial sobre la Transformación de la Educación convocada por Naciones Unidas. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Retrieved September 19, 2022, from https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/salaprensa/Comunicados/412154:Para-continuar-cimentando-las-bases-de-la-socie- dad-del-conocimiento-el-ministro-Alejandro-Gaviria-participa-en-la-Cum- bre-mundial-sobre-la-Transformacion-de-la-Educacion-convocada-por-Naci
dc.relation.referencesMustafa, E., & Mische, A. (1998, January). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
dc.relation.referencesNord Anglia Education. (n.d.). Internationally Respected Curricula. Nord Anglia Education. https://www.nordangliaeducation.com/about-us/ about-nord-anglia-education
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D., & Meyer, M. W. (2020, Spring). Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D. A., & Verganti, R. (2014, Winter). Incremental and Radical Innova- tion: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues, The MIT Press, 30(1), 78-96.
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (n.d.). OECD: Better policies for better lives. OECD.org. https://www. oecd.org/
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2019). OECD FUTURE OF EDUCATION AND SKILLS 2030. OECD. https:// www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
dc.relation.referencesPanke, S. (2019). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies, De Gruyter, 1, 281–306. https://doi. org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
dc.relation.referencesParra Marín, C. (2019). AGENDA VISUAL Y HABILIDADES DE AUTONOMÍA PER- SONAL Y SOCIAL. Universidad Católica Luis Amigo. https://arasaac.org/ materials/es/2057?
dc.relation.referencesPeralta López, F., & Arellano Torres, A. (2014, julio 2). La autodetermi- nación de las personas con discapacidad intelectual: situación actual en España. CES Psicología, 7, 59-77. ISSN 2011-3080. https://www.redalyc.org/ pdf/4235/423539424006.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPMC, PubMed Central. (n.d.). Measuring agency as a dimension of empower- ment among young adolescents globally; findings from the Global Early Adoles- cent Study. NCBI, National center of biotechnology information. https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6660556/#sec5title
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10:1, 5-14. DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
dc.relation.referencesSantillán, P. (n.d.). Design for Social Change. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. https://www.ntnu.edu/documents/139799/1273574286/ TPD4505.Patricia.Santillan.pdf/17b9083d-eb8f-4e86-8372-daeb6a7ae3aa
dc.relation.referencesSchon, D. A. (2008). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books.
dc.relation.referencesSchuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Taylor & Francis.
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (Third edition ed.). The MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesSirendi, R., & Taveter, K. (2016). Bringing Service Design Thinking into the Public Sector to Create Proactive and User-Friendly Public Services. Tal- linn University of Technology, Akadeemia tee 15a, Tallinn, Estonia, 221–230. 10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_21
dc.relation.referencesSirkin, J., Givaudan, M., & Xolocotzin Eligio, U. (2007, 12). Escala Para Medir Agen- cia Personal y Empoderamiento (ESAGE). Revista Interamericana de psicologia/ Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 295-304. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/26604737
dc.relation.referencesSivasubramanian, S. (2013). PROMOTING INNOVATION IN CORPORATE PROJECTS THROUGH LEADERSHIP PRACTICES. University of Technology, Sydney. https:// opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/23475/5/02whole.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSPINUZZI, C. (2005, May). The Methodology of Participatory Design. Technical- COMAlNCATION, 52(2), 163-174.
dc.relation.referencesTellez, F. (2017). Empathy Expression and Development in the Context of Indus- trial Design Education. North Carolina State University. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/ resolver/1840.20/33702
dc.relation.referencesThibodeaux, T., Harapnuik, D., & Cummings, C. (2019). Student Perceptions of the Influence of Choice, Ownership, and Voice in Learning and the Learning Environment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Educa- tion, 31(1), 50-62. ISSN 1812-9129. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE3199.pdf
dc.relation.referencesTransforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Depart- ment of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (n.d.). UNESCO in brief - Mission and Mandate. United Nations Edu- cational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://en.unesco.org/about-us/ introducing-unesco
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2012). International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/inter- national-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations: Depart- ment of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. https://sdgs. un.org/goals
dc.relation.referencesVerganti,, R. (2017). Design Thinkers Think Like Managers. she ji The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 100-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sheji.2017.10.006
dc.relation.referencesWong, B., Koh, J. H. L., Hong, H.-Y., & Chai, C. S. (2015). Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning. Springer Nature Singapore.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lembEducación de niños
dc.subject.lembEducation of children
dc.subject.lembPedagogía
dc.subject.lembTeaching
dc.subject.lembMétodos de enseñanaza
dc.subject.lembEducational method
dc.subject.proposalAgencia
dc.subject.proposalDiseño
dc.subject.proposalPensamiento de diseño
dc.subject.proposalHabilidades de diseño
dc.subject.proposalAgency
dc.subject.proposalDesign
dc.subject.proposalDesign thinking
dc.subject.proposalDesign skills
dc.title.translatedEducación en Diseño para el desarrollo de Agencia en Niñas y Niños de 10-11 años
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
oaire.awardtitleDesign Education for Agency Development in children aged 10-11
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPersonal de apoyo escolar
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalEsta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito