Caracterización cualitativa de los factores incidentes presentes en los prestadores de servicios de movilidad compartida en la transición hacia un MaaS, bajo el enfoque de movilidad sostenible

dc.contributor.advisorBulla Cruz, Lenin Alexander
dc.contributor.advisorMangones Matos, Sonia Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorAcosta Mora, Andrés Felipe
dc.contributor.orcidAcosta Mora, Andrés Felipe [0009000682275818]
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Logística para El Transporte Sostenible y la Seguridad Translogyt
dc.coverage.countryColombia
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-25T15:23:46Z
dc.date.available2025-08-25T15:23:46Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionilustraciones a color, diagramas, mapasspa
dc.description.abstractEl presente estudio analiza los factores incidentes en el carpooling y su potencial transición hacia un modelo de Movilidad como Servicio (Mobility as a Service - MaaS), con énfasis en comunidades universitarias en Bogotá. Se realizó una revisión de literatura sobre movilidad sostenible, movilidad compartida y MaaS, destacando su impacto en la reducción del tráfico y las emisiones de CO₂. Se llevó a cabo un diagnóstico exploratorio de la oferta de servicios de carpooling en campus universitarios, identificando barreras y motivadores claves para los conductores. Mediante una metodología cualitativa basada en entrevistas semiestructuradas y grupos focales, se evaluaron a 26 conductores de carpooling en comunidades universitarias donde se identificaron patrones de operación, percepciones sobre seguridad y disposición para integrarse a un MaaS. Los resultados indican que la mayoría son hombres jóvenes de estratos 3 y 4, estudiantes con ingresos medios, que operan mediante WhatsApp, pagos electrónicos y vehículos pequeños. Entre los factores que desencadenan y motivan la adopción del carpooling se encuentran la rentabilidad, los incentivos por exención de restricciones y la posibilidad de socializar en el viaje. Las principales barreras están relacionadas con la congestión vial y el riesgo de robo o violencia. Frente a la transición hacia MaaS, los conductores muestran alta disposición, motivados por la integración multimodal y beneficios tecnológicos, aunque persisten preocupaciones sobre la seguridad personal y la privacidad de los datos. Finalmente, se compararon casos internacionales exitosos y se proponen estrategias para facilitar la integración efectiva del carpooling en modelos MaaS (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes the factors involved in carpooling and its potential transition to a Mobility as a Service (MaaS) model, with emphasis on university communities in Bogota. A literature review was conducted on sustainable mobility, shared mobility and MaaS, highlighting their impact on traffic reduction and CO₂ emissions. An exploratory diagnosis of the supply of carpooling services on university campuses was carried out, identifying key barriers and motivators for drivers. Using a qualitative methodology based on semi-structured interviews and focus groups, 26 carpooling drivers in university communities were evaluated where patterns of operation, perceptions about safety and willingness to join a MaaS were identified. The results indicate that the majority are young men from strata 3 and 4, students with average income, operating through WhatsApp, electronic payments and small vehicles. Among the factors that trigger and motivate the adoption of carpooling are cost-effectiveness, incentives for exemption from restrictions and the possibility of socializing while traveling. The main barriers are related to road congestion and the risk of theft or violence. Regarding the transition to MaaS, drivers show high willingness, motivated by multimodal integration and technological benefits, although concerns about personal security and data privacy persist. Finally, successful international cases are compared, and strategies are proposed to facilitate the effective integration of carpooling into MaaS models.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Ingeniería - Transporte
dc.description.methodsMediante una metodología cualitativa basada en entrevistas semiestructuradas y grupos focales, se evaluaron a 26 conductores de carpooling en comunidades universitarias donde se identificaron patrones de operación, percepciones sobre seguridad y disposición para integrarse a un MaaS.
dc.description.researchareaMovilidad, medio ambiente y desarrollo tecnológico
dc.description.sponsorshipDe conformidad con el Resolución 8 de la 0- Vicerrectoría de sede, en el marco de la Convocatoria Nacional para el Fortalecimiento de la formación a través del apoyo a proyectos de investigación, creación artística e innovación de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2022-2024, modalidad única: proyectos de investigación, creación artística e innovación de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2022-2024, se aprobó la ejecución del proyecto "Identificación de factores desencadenantes, motivadores y barreras para la adopción de servicios de movilidad compartida en la transición hacia un MaaS ", código HERMES 57548.
dc.format.extentxviii, 198 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88447
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Transporte
dc.relation.referencesAba, A., Kerényi, T., y Esztergár-Kiss, D. (2021). Overview of the potential of Mobility as a Service. https://stumejournals.com/journals/tm/2021/3/88.full.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAcevedo, J., Bocarejo, J. P. (2009). Movilidad Sostenible: Una Construcción Multidisciplinaria. Revista de Ingeniería, 29, 71–74. https://doi.org/10.16924/revinge.29.8
dc.relation.referencesAckermann, M. (2021). Why Mobility-as-a-Service? (pp. 7–34). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75590-4_2
dc.relation.referencesAcosta, A. (2021). Análisis de cifras de siniestralidad vial en Bogotá: Oportunidades y retos para el fortalecimiento de la política distrital de seguridad vial. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21631.52646
dc.relation.referencesAgatz, N., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M., Wang, X. (2012). Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.028
dc.relation.referencesAlbalate, D., Fageda, X. (2019). Congestion, Road Safety, and the Effectiveness of Public Policies in Urban Areas. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 5092, 11(18), 5092. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11185092
dc.relation.referencesAlessandretti, L., Natera Orozco, L. G., Saberi, M., Szell, M., y Battiston, F. (2023). Multimodal urban mobility and multilayer transport networks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(8), 2038–2070. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221108190
dc.relation.referencesAl-Masaeid, H. R., y Al Olaimat, G. A. (2023). Modeling Determinants of Carpooling Intentions in Jordan. In Transportation Research Record (Vol. 2677, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221117819
dc.relation.referencesAlogdianakis, F., Gkartzonikas, C., y Dimitriou, L. (2024). Development of a credit scheme for managing mobility in university communities: Results from a feasibility study. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 53, 101106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RTBM.2024.101106
dc.relation.referencesAlonso-González, M. J., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., van Oort, N., Cats, O., Hoogendoorn, S. (2020). Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 378–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.022
dc.relation.referencesAlyavina, E., Nikitas, A., Njoya, E. T. (2024). Mobility-as-a-Service and unsustainable travel behaviour: Exploring the car ownership and public transport trip replacement side-effects of the MaaS paradigm. Transport Policy, 150, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2024.03.001
dc.relation.referencesAman, J. J. C., Smith-Colin, J. (2022). Application of crowdsourced data to infer user satisfaction with Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 15, 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIP.2022.100672
dc.relation.referencesAmbrosino, G., Nelson, J. D., Boero, M., Pettinelli, I. (2016). Enabling intermodal urban transport through complementary services: From Flexible Mobility Services to the Shared Use Mobility Agency: Workshop 4. Developing inter-modal transport systems. Research in Transportation Economics, 59, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RETREC.2016.07.015
dc.relation.referencesAnthony, B. (2024). Developing a decentralized community of practice-based model for on-demand electric car-pooling towards sustainable shared mobility. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 15, 101136. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSTP.2023.101136
dc.relation.referencesArias-Molinares, D., García-Palomares, J. C. (2020). The Ws of MaaS: Understanding mobility as a service fromaliterature review. IATSS Research, 44(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.02.001
dc.relation.referencesArnold, T., Bachmann, F., Haefeli, Ueli. (2017). Sharing Economy: Blosser Hype oder echtes Versprechen? https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-148310
dc.relation.referencesAshraf Javid, M., Al-Khayyat, M. A. (2021). Factors affecting the student’s intentions to choose carpooling: a case study in Oman. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 44(4), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2021.1897685
dc.relation.referencesBachmann, F., Hanimann, A., Artho, J., Jonas, K. (2018). What drives people to carpool? Explaining carpooling intention from the perspectives of carpooling passengers and drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.022
dc.relation.referencesBanister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2007.10.005
dc.relation.referencesBanister, D. (2011). Cities, mobility and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1538–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2011.03.009
dc.relation.referencesBarrios, B. E. (2015). Tres momentos críticos de la Teoría Fundamentada Clásica. In Revista Universitaria de Investigación (Vol. 16).
dc.relation.referencesBastos, J. T., dos Santos, P. A. B., Amancio, E. C., Gadda, T. M. C., Ramalho, J. A., King, M. J., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2021). Is organized carpooling safer? Speeding and distracted driving behaviors from a naturalistic driving study in Brazil. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 152, 105992. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2021.105992
dc.relation.referencesBaumgarte, F., Brandt, T., Keller, R., Röhrich, F., Schmidt, L. (2021). You’ll never share alone: Analyzing carsharing user group behavior. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 93, 102754. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2021.102754
dc.relation.referencesBebber, S., Libardi, B., De Atayde Moschen, S., Correa da Silva, M. B., Cristina Fachinelli, A., Nogueira, M. L. (2021). Sustainable mobility scale: A contribution for sustainability assessment systems in urban mobility. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 5, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLET.2021.100271
dc.relation.referencesBecker, H., Balac, M., Ciari, F., Axhausen, K. W. (2020). Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2019.09.027
dc.relation.referencesBeirão, G., Sarsfield Cabral, J. A. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009
dc.relation.referencesBergman, N., Schwanen, T., Sovacool, B. K. (2017). Imagined people, behaviour and future mobility: Insights from visions of electric vehicles and car clubs in the United Kingdom. Transport Policy, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.07.016
dc.relation.referencesBicocchi, N., Mamei, M. (2014). Investigating ride sharing opportunities through mobility data analysis. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 14, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PMCJ.2014.05.010
dc.relation.referencesBongardt, D., Stiller, L., Swart, A., Wagner, A. (2019). Sustainable Urban Transport: Avoid-Shift-Improve (A-S-I). iNUA #9.
dc.relation.referencesBrasileiro, A., Andrade, M. O. de Vasconcelos, D. (2023). Mobilidade sustentável e tecnologias digitais: uma agenda baseada nos comuns urbanos. Cadernos Metrópole, 25(57). https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2023-5706
dc.relation.referencesBruglieri, M., Ciccarelli, D., Colornia, A., Luè, A. (2011). PoliUniPool: a carpooling system for universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2011.08.062
dc.relation.referencesBuldeo Rai, H., Verlinde, S., Merckx, J., Macharis, C. (2017). Crowd logistics: an opportunity for more sustainable urban freight transport? European Transport Research Review, 9(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0256-6
dc.relation.referencesBurghard, U., Dütschke, E. (2019). Who wants shared mobility? Lessons from early adopters and mainstream drivers on electric carsharing in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.011
dc.relation.referencesButler, L., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A. (2021a). Barriers and risks of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) adoption in cities: A systematic review of the literature. Cities, 109, 103036. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2020.103036
dc.relation.referencesButler, L., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A. (2021b). Barriers and risks of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) adoption in cities: A systematic review of the literature. Cities, 109, 103036. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2020.103036
dc.relation.referencesCalatayud, A., Rivas, M. E., Camacho, J., Beltrán, C., Ansaldo, M., Café, E. (2023). Transporte 2050: el camino hacia la descarbonización y la resiliencia climática en América Latina y el Caribe. https://doi.org/10.18235/0005196
dc.relation.referencesCaliskan, M., Graupner, D., Mauve, M. (2006). Decentralized discovery of free parking places. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/1161064.1161070
dc.relation.referencesCandia, S., Pirlone, F., Spadaro, I. (2019). SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY AND URBAN SAFETY AND SECURITY: A CASE STUDY OF THE CITY CENTRE OF GENOA, ITALY. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 182, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.2495/UT180181
dc.relation.referencesCanitez, F. (2019). Pathways to sustainable urban mobility in developing megacities: A socio-technical transition perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2019.01.008
dc.relation.referencesCastañeda-Meneses, P. L., Castañeda-Meneses, P. L. (2023). Efectos de la movilidad urbana en la salud mental. El caso de Valparaíso Metropolitano, Chile. Prospectiva, 36, e21712927. https://doi.org/10.25100/PRTS.V0I36.12927
dc.relation.referencesCastro-Nuño, M., Castillo-Manzano, J. I., Fageda, X. (2018). The role of road safety in a sustainable urban mobility: An econometric assessment of the Spanish NUTS-3 case. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1346733
dc.relation.referencesCavalcanti, C. de O., Limont, M., Dziedzic, M., Fernandes, V. (2017). Sustainability of urban mobility projects in the Curitiba metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 60, 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2016.11.015
dc.relation.referencesCellina, F., Derboni, M., Giuffrida, V., Tomic, U., Hoerler, R. (2024). Trust me if you can: Practical challenges affecting the integration of carpooling in Mobility-as-a-Service platforms. Travel Behaviour and Society, 37, 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TBS.2024.100832
dc.relation.referencesChakraborty, S., Kumar, N. M., Jayakumar, A., Dash, S. K., Elangovan, D. (2021). Selected Aspects of Sustainable Mobility Reveals Implementable Approaches and Conceivable Actions. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 12918, 13(22), 12918. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU132212918
dc.relation.referencesChan, N. D., Shaheen, S. A. (2012). Ridesharing in North America: Past, Present, and Future. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.621557
dc.relation.referencesChatziioannou, I., Alvarez-Icaza, L., Bakogiannis, E., Kyriakidis, C., Chias-Becerril, L. (2020). A Structural Analysis for the Categorization of the Negative Externalities of Transport and the Hierarchical Organization of Sustainable Mobility’s Strategies. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 6011, 12(15), 6011. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12156011
dc.relation.referencesChatziioannou, I., Nikitas, A., Tzouras, P. G., Bakogiannis, E., Alvarez-Icaza, L., Chias-Becerril, L., Karolemeas, C., Tsigdinos, S., Wallgren, P., Rexfelt, O. (2023). Ranking sustainable urban mobility indicators and their matching transport policies to support liveable city Futures: A MICMAC approach. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 18, 100788. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIP.2023.100788
dc.relation.referencesChaube, V., Kavanaugh, A. L., Pérez-Quiñones, M. A. (2010). Leveraging social networks to embed trust in rideshare programs. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.255
dc.relation.referencesCoppola, P., Silvestri, F., Pastorelli, L. (2025). Mobility as a Service (MaaS) for university communities: Modeling preferences for integrated public transport bundles. Travel Behaviour and Society, 38, 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TBS.2024.100890
dc.relation.referencesCorreia, C. R., Roseland, M. (2022). Addressing Negative Externalities of Urban Development: Toward a More Sustainable Approach. Urban Science 2022, Vol. 6, Page 38, 6(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/URBANSCI6020038
dc.relation.referencesCorreia, G., Viegas, J. M. (2011). Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.11.001
dc.relation.referencesD’Alberto, R., Giudici, H. (2023a). A sustainable smart mobility? Opportunities and challenges from a big data use perspective. Sustainable Futures, 6, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SFTR.2023.100118
dc.relation.referencesD’Alberto, R., Giudici, H. (2023b). A sustainable smart mobility? Opportunities and challenges from a big data use perspective. Sustainable Futures, 6, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SFTR.2023.100118
dc.relation.referencesDaraio, E., Cagliero, L., Chiusano, S., Garza, P., Giordano, D. (2020). Predicting car availability in free floating car sharing systems: Leveraging machine learning in challenging contexts. Electronics (Switzerland), 9(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081322
dc.relation.referencesDelgado-Fernández, V., Rey-Merchán, M. del C., Rosa, M. P. (2024). Development and Assessment of a Carpooling Applied System: Perspective of Users from Public-Education Sector. Sustainability, 16(23), 10330. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310330
dc.relation.referencesDelhomme, P., Gheorghiu, A. (2016). Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: Which factors contribute the most to carpooling? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 42, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.014
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. In Inv Ed Med (Vol. 2, Issue 7). www.elsevier.es
dc.relation.referencesDjavadian, S., Farooq, B., Meshkani, S. M. (2021). Demand for shared mobility to complement public transportation: Human driven and autonomous vehicles.
dc.relation.referencesDurand, A., Harms, L., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., Zijlstra, T. (2018). Mobility-as-a-Service and changes in travel preferences and travel behaviour: a literature review (The KiM Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis, Ed.). Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anne-Durand-6/publication/330958677_Mobility-as-a-Service_and_changes_in_travel_preferences_and_travel_behaviour_a_literature_review/links/5c5d5bae45851582c3d60c0f/Mobility-as-a-Service-and-changes-in-travel-preference
dc.relation.referencesEfthymiou, D., Antoniou, C., Waddell, P. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers. Transport Policy, 29, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2013.04.009
dc.relation.referencesEscobar, J., Francy, Y., Bonilla-Jimenez, I. (2017). Grupos focales: una guía conceptual y metodológica. Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología CUADERNOS HISPANOAMERICANOS DE PSICOLOGÍA, 9(1), 51–67.
dc.relation.referencesFarooq, A. S., Javid, M. A., Hassan, M. K., Anwer, I. (2025). Evaluating the carpooling potential among travelers in the suburbs of Islamabad considering carpooling clubs, monetary incentives, and digital apps. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 60, 101363. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RTBM.2025.101363
dc.relation.referencesFaus, M., Alonso, F., Esteban, C., Velarte, J. L. (2025). More Sustainable but More Dangerous Cities: The Role of Communication Campaigns in Protecting Vulnerable Road Users. Sustainability 2025, Vol. 17, Page 2002, 17(5), 2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU17052002
dc.relation.referencesFenton, P., Chimenti, G., Kanda, W. (2020). The role of local government in governance and diffusion of Mobility-as-a-Service: exploring the views of MaaS stakeholders in Stockholm. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(14), 2554–2576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1740655
dc.relation.referencesFerreyra. (2014). ¿Qué quiere decir Movilidad sustentable? Autocosmos. https://noticias.autocosmos.com.ar/2014/08/01/que-quiere-decir-movilidad-sustentable
dc.relation.referencesFitschen, P., Merfeld, K., Klein, J. F., Henkel, S. (2024). Understanding the urban mobility challenge: Why shared mobility providers fail to attract car drivers. Transport Policy, 158, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2024.09.010
dc.relation.referencesFuruhata, M., Dessouky, M., Ordóñez, F., Brunet, M.-E., Wang, X., Koenig, S. (2013). Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 57, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.08.012
dc.relation.referencesGallo, M., Marinelli, M. (2020). Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 7499, 12(18), 7499. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12187499
dc.relation.referencesGheorghiu, A., Delhomme, P. (2018). For which types of trips do French drivers carpool? Motivations underlying carpooling for different types of trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2018.05.002
dc.relation.referencesGiesecke, R., Surakka, T., Hakonen, M. (2016). Conceptualising Mobility as a Service. 2016 Eleventh International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/EVER.2016.7476443
dc.relation.referencesGivoni, M., Banister, D. (2010). Integrated Transport: From Policy to Practice (M. Givoni D. Banister, Eds.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850886
dc.relation.referencesGonzález Pérez, M. G. (2020). Caracterización de la movilidad compartida de las empresas de redes de transporte en México: entropía, homeostasis, negentropía. Ingeniare. Revista Chilena de Ingeniería, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33052020000400731
dc.relation.referencesGu, Q.-P., Liang, J. L. (2021). Multimodal Transportation with Ridesharing of Personal Vehicles.
dc.relation.referencesGuzman, L. A., Arellana, J. Alvarez, V. (2020). Confronting congestion in urban areas: Developing Sustainable Mobility Plans for public and private organizations in Bogotá. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.019
dc.relation.referencesGuzman, L. A., Oviedo, D., Rivera, C. (2017). Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region. Journal of Transport Geography, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.016
dc.relation.referencesHaroon, W., Khan, M. A., Ilyas, Z., Almujibah, H. R., Ashfaq, M., Hamza, M. (2023). Analyzing Travelers’ Perception and Impacts of Carpooling on Traffic Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.2155.v1
dc.relation.referencesHaroon, W., Khan, M. A., Ilyas, Z., Almujibah, H. R., Zubair, M. U., Ashfaq, M., Hamza, M. (2024). Analyzing Young Adult Travelers’ Perception and Impacts of Carpooling on Traffic Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(14), 6098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146098
dc.relation.referencesHasselwander, M., Bigotte, J. F. (2023). Mobility as a Service (MaaS) in the Global South: research findings, gaps, and directions. European Transport Research Review, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12544-023-00604-2/TABLES/4
dc.relation.referencesHeikkilä S. (2014). Mobility as a Service-A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration Case Helsinki. www.aalto.fi
dc.relation.referencesHensher, D. A. (2020). What might Covid-19 mean for mobility as a service (MaaS)? Transport Reviews, 40(5), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1770487
dc.relation.referencesHensher, D. A., Mulley, C., Nelson, J. D. (2021). Mobility as a service (MaaS) – Going somewhere or nowhere? Transport Policy, 111, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2021.07.021
dc.relation.referencesHensher, D., Ho, C., Mulley, C., Nelson, J., Smith, G., Wong, Y. (2020). Understanding Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Past, Present and Future.
dc.relation.referencesHernández Sampieri, Roberto., Fernández Collado, Carlos., Baptista Lucio, Pilar. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation.referencesHickman, R., Hall, P., Banister, D. (2013). Planning more for sustainable mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 33, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2013.07.004
dc.relation.referencesHietanen, S. (2014a). Mobility as a service The New Transport Paradigm. https://doi.org/10.3.2015
dc.relation.referencesHietanen, S. (2014b). Mobility as a service The New Transport Paradigm. https://doi.org/10.3.2015
dc.relation.referencesHorton, J. (2020). Carpooling Cultures: learning from University students on-the-move. https://ro.uow.edu.au/thss
dc.relation.referencesHuang, K., Liu, Z., Kim, I., Zhang, Y., Zhu, T. (2019). Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Carpooling Schemes. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 11(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2019.2919550
dc.relation.referencesHughes, J. E., Kaffine, D. (2019). When should drivers be encouraged to carpool in hov lanes? Economic Inquiry, 57(1), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12728
dc.relation.referencesJain, T., Johnson, M., Rose, G. (2020). Exploring the process of travel behaviour change and mobility trajectories associated with car share adoption. Travel Behaviour and Society, 18, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TBS.2019.10.006
dc.relation.referencesJavid, M. A., Mehmood, T., Asif, H. M., Vaince, A. U., Raza, M. (2017). Travelers’ attitudes toward carpooling in Lahore: motives and constraints. Journal of Modern Transportation, 25(4), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-017-0135-9
dc.relation.referencesJelti, F., Allouhi, A., Tabet Aoul, K. A. (2023). Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2023, Vol. 15, Page 15457, 15(21), 15457. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU152115457
dc.relation.referencesJie, F., Standing, C., Biermann, S., Standing, S., Le, T. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of shared mobility systems: Evidence from Australia. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 41, 100651. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RTBM.2021.100651
dc.relation.referencesJin, Z. R., Qiu, A. Z. (2019). Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) Testbed as an Integrated Approach for New Mobility - A Living Lab Case Study in Singapore. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11596 LNCS, 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22666-4_32/FIGURES/2
dc.relation.referencesJittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A. M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., Alonso-González, M. J., Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i2.931
dc.relation.referencesJusticia de la Torre, M. del C. (2017). Nuevas técnicas de minería de textos: Aplicaciones. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/46975
dc.relation.referencesKamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., Schäfer, A. (2016a). A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3294–3303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277
dc.relation.referencesKamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., Schäfer, A. (2016b). A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3294–3303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2016.05.277
dc.relation.referencesKamargianni, M., Matyas, M. (2017). The Business Ecosystem of Mobility-as-a-Service. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314760234
dc.relation.referencesKiba-Janiak, M., Witkowski, J. (2019a). Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work? Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 4605, 11(17), 4605. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11174605
dc.relation.referencesKiba-Janiak, M., Witkowski, J. (2019b). Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work? Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 4605, 11(17), 4605. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11174605
dc.relation.referencesKorosec, K. (2021). Trafi lleva su plataforma de movilidad como servicio a Latinoamérica, empezando por Bogotá | TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2021/02/15/trafi-takes-its-mobility-as-a-service-platform-to-latam-starting-with-bogota/
dc.relation.referencesLa Rota S. (2011). Factores que determinan la participación de las personas en un sistema de carpooling en la Universidad de los Andes. https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstream/handle/1992/14619/u442634.pdf?sequence=1
dc.relation.referencesLabee, P., Rasouli, S., Liao, F. (2022). The implications of Mobility as a Service for urban emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103128
dc.relation.referencesLagadic, M., Verloes, A., Louvet, N. (2019). Can carsharing services be profitable? A critical review of established and developing business models. Transport Policy, 77, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2019.02.006
dc.relation.referencesLanzini, P., Stocchetti, A. (2021). From techno-centrism to socio-centrism: The evolution of principles for urban sustainable mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(11), 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1827315;SUBPAGE:STRING:ACCESS
dc.relation.referencesLe Boennec, R., Roger, S., Cœugnet, S. (2024). The impact of personality on the propensity of carpooling to work. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 107, 1144–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2024.11.006
dc.relation.referencesLe Pira, M., Tavasszy, L. A., Correia, G. H. de A., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G. (2021). Opportunities for integration between Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and freight transport: A conceptual model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2021.103212
dc.relation.referencesLeat, S. R., Ravi, K. E., Nordberg, A., Voth Schrag, R. (2022). Exploring the feasibility of shared mobility services for reducing transportation disadvantage among survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Transport and Health, 27, 101517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2022.101517
dc.relation.referencesLevin, I. P. (1982). Measuring tradeoffs in carpool driving arrangement preferences. Transportation, 11(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165595
dc.relation.referencesLi, M., Zhu, L., Lin, X. (2019). Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Carpooling Using Blockchain-Assisted Vehicular Fog Computing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(3), 4573–4584. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2868076
dc.relation.referencesLin, J., Silfvenius, C. (2025). Some Critical Thinking on Electric Vehicle Battery Reliability: From Enhancement to Optimization. Batteries 2025, Vol. 11, Page 48, 11(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/BATTERIES11020048
dc.relation.referencesLiu, X., Titheridge, H., Yan, X., Wang, R., Tan, W., Chen, D., Zhang, J. (2020). A passenger-to-driver matching model for commuter carpooling: Case study and sensitivity analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 117, 102702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102702
dc.relation.referencesLoo, B. P., Tsoi, K. H. (2022). Road safety strategies necessary in the second Decade of Road Safety. Journal of Global Health, 12, 03081. https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.12.03081
dc.relation.referencesLue, A., Colorni, A. (2009). A software tool for commute carpooling: a case study on university students in Milan. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2(3/4), 222. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2009.026540
dc.relation.referencesLund, E., Kerttu, J., Koglin, T. (2017a). Drivers and Barriers for Integrated Mobility Services A review of research.
dc.relation.referencesLund, E., Kerttu, J., Koglin, T. (2017b). Drivers and Barriers for Integrated Mobility Services A review of research.
dc.relation.referencesMa, Y., Rong, K., Mangalagiu, D., Thornton, T. F., Zhu, D. (2018). Co-evolution between urban sustainability and business ecosystem innovation: Evidence from the sharing mobility sector in Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 942–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.323
dc.relation.referencesMaas, B. (2022). Literature Review of Mobility as a Service. Sustainability, 14(14), 8962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148962
dc.relation.referencesMahrez, Z., Sabir, E., Badidi, E., Saad, W., Sadik, M. (2022). Smart Urban Mobility: When Mobility Systems Meet Smart Data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(7), 6222–6239. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3084907
dc.relation.referencesMakarova, I., Buyvol, P., Shubenkova, K., Fatikhova, L., Parsin, G. (2023). Editorial: Sustainable transport systems. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1161361. https://doi.org/10.3389/FBUIL.2023.1161361/BIBTEX
dc.relation.referencesMalik, S., Swapan, M. S. H., Khan, S. (2020). Sustainable Mobility through Safer Roads: Translating Road Safety Strategy into Local Context in Western Australia. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 8929, 12(21), 8929. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12218929
dc.relation.referencesMaltese, I., Gatta, V., Marcucci, E. (2021). Active Travel in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. An Italian overview. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 40, 100621. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RTBM.2021.100621
dc.relation.referencesManzoni, V., Codecà, F., Moia, A., Savaresi, S. M. (2009). Integration of electric pedal assisted bikes in a bike-sharing system. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 42(15), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.3182/20090902-3-US-2007.0062
dc.relation.referencesMarx, R., De Mello, A. M., Zilbovicius, M., De Lara, F. F. (2015). Spatial contexts and firm strategies: applying the multilevel perspective to sustainable urban mobility transitions in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1092–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.09.001
dc.relation.referencesMella, O. (2000). Grupos focales (“focus groups”). técnica de investigación cualitativa. In Publicado como Documento de Trabajo N° (Vol. 3).
dc.relation.referencesMetz, Y., Ackermann, D., Keim, D. A., Fischer, M. T. (2024). Interactive Public Transport Infrastructure Analysis through Mobility Profiles: Making the Mobility Transition Transparent. 2024 IEEE Visualization in Data Science (VDS), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/VDS63897.2024.00006
dc.relation.referencesMillard-Ball, A., Murray, G., Ter Schure, J., Fox, C., Burkhardt, J. (2005). Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds. Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.17226/13559
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Transportes, M. y A. U. (2023). Observatorio del transporte y la logística en España. https://observatoriotransporte.mitma.gob.es/monografico/movilidad_ciudades_sxxi/5tendencias-medidas-y-buenaspracticas-en-el-ambito-de-la-movilidad-metropolitana/55-plataformas-multimodales-de-servicios-de-transporte-publico-
dc.relation.referencesMitropoulos, L., Kortsari, A., Ayfantopoulou, G. (2021a). Factors Affecting Drivers to Participate in a Carpooling to Public Transport Service. Sustainability, 13(16), 9129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169129
dc.relation.referencesMitropoulos, L., Kortsari, A., Ayfantopoulou, G. (2021b). Factors Affecting Drivers to Participate in a Carpooling to Public Transport Service. Sustainability, 13(16), 9129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169129
dc.relation.referencesMohammed, A., Salam, S., Tahmasseby, S., Alhajyaseen, W. (2025). Governance as Success Factor for Implementing MaaS in Countries with High Share of Expatriates: Qatar’s Case Study. Transportation Research Procedia, 82, 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2024.12.059
dc.relation.referencesMolina F, Espitia A. (2016). Propuesta de diseño e implementación de una aplicación móvil (App) como plataforma para compartir el uso del carro particular (carpooling) entre empleados de las sucursales en Bogotá de la empresa Claro Colombia s.a., para teléfonos inteligentes cuyo sistema operativo sea Android 5.1. https://repository.udistrital.edu.co/handle/11349/4536
dc.relation.referencesMolina, J. A., Ignacio Giménez-Nadal, J., Velilla, J. (2020). Sustainable commuting: Results from a social approach and international evidence on carpooling. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229587
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro, C. M., Machado, C. A. S., Nardocci, A. C., Berssaneti, F. T., Quintanilha, J. A., Davis, C. A. (2021). Shared Mobility Opportunities and Their Computational Challenges for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life. International Encyclopedia of Transportation: Volume 1-7, 7, 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10754-7
dc.relation.referencesMovilidad Conectada. (2018). Los 7 principios del ‘Mobility as a Service’ (MaaS) – movilidad conectada. https://movilidadconectada.com/2018/06/14/los-7-principios-del-mobility-as-a-service-maas/
dc.relation.referencesMulley, C. (2017). Mobility as a Services (MaaS)–does it have critical mass? Transport Reviews, 37(3), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1280932
dc.relation.referencesMulley, C., Nelson, J. D., Ho, C., Hensher, D. A. (2023). MaaS in a regional and rural setting: Recent experience. Transport Policy, 133, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.014
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz B., M. R., Panagakos, G., Shrestha, S., Martin, E., Hasselwander, M., Bonsu, S., López Realpe, G., Bachetti, F., Bruhn Barfod, M. (2024). Analyzing the enabling factors to implement MaaS in Asian, African and Latin American cities.
dc.relation.referencesMusolino, G., Rindone, C., Vitale, A., Vitetta, A. (2023). Pilot survey of passengers’ preferences in Mobility as a Service (MaaS) scenarios: a case study. Transportation Research Procedia, 69, 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.179
dc.relation.referencesNarayanan, S., Antoniou, C. (2023). Shared mobility services towards Mobility as a Service (MaaS): What, who and when? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103581
dc.relation.referencesNeoh, J. G., Chipulu, M., Marshall, A., Tewkesbury, A. (2018). How commuters’ motivations to drive relate to propensity to carpool: Evidence from the United Kingdom and the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 110, 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2018.02.013
dc.relation.referencesOficina de Gestión Ambiental. (2022). Glosario Ambiental - OGA. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://ogabogota.unal.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Sistema-de-Gesti%C3%B3n-Ambiental-Documentaci%C3%B3n-y-Otros-T%C3%A9rminos-Ambientales.pdf
dc.relation.referencesOlsson, L. E., Maier, R., Friman, M. (2019). Why Do They Ride with Others? Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing Travelers to Carpool. Sustainability, 11(8), 2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082414
dc.relation.referencesOviedo, D., Cavoli, C., Levy, C., Koroma, B., Macarthy, J., Sabogal, O., Arroyo, F., Jones, P. (2022). Accessibility and sustainable mobility transitions in Africa: Insights from Freetown. Journal of Transport Geography, 105, 103464. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2022.103464
dc.relation.referencesPagoni, I., Gatto, M., Tsouros, I., Tsirimpa, A., Polydoropoulou, A., Galli, G., Stefanelli, T. (2022). Mobility-as-a-service: insights to policymakers and prospective MaaS operators. Transportation Letters, 14(4), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2020.1815141
dc.relation.referencesPangbourne, K., Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D., Milakis, D. (2020). Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.033
dc.relation.referencesPark, Y., Chen, N., Akar, G. (2018). Who is Interested in Carpooling and Why: The Importance of Individual Characteristics, Role Preferences and Carpool Markets. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(8), 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118756883
dc.relation.referencesPlyushteva, A. (2023). Affording mobility: Attending to the socio-material affordances of transport un/affordability. Journal of Transport Geography, 108, 103558. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2023.103558
dc.relation.referencesPolydoropoulou, A., Pagoni, I., Tsirimpa, A. (2020a). Ready for Mobility as a Service? Insights from stakeholders and end-users. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.11.003
dc.relation.referencesPolydoropoulou, A., Pagoni, I., Tsirimpa, A. (2020b). Ready for Mobility as a Service? Insights from stakeholders and end-users. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.11.003
dc.relation.referencesPrieto, M., March, J. (2009). Investigación Cualitativa ¿Qué son los grupos focales?
dc.relation.referencesQuintero-González, J. R. (2019). Desarrollo Orientado al Transporte Sostenible (DOTS). Una prospectiva para Colombia. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 29(3), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.15446/BITACORA.V29N3.65979
dc.relation.referencesRamírez-Pisco, R., Vásquez Stanescu, C. L. (2020). Principios para un transporte urbano sostenible en Iberoamérica hacia la transición energética. TRIM. Tordesillas, Revista de Investigación Multidisciplinar, 17, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.24197/trim.17.2019.7-14
dc.relation.referencesRavindra, K., Singh, T., Vardhan, S., Shrivastava, A., Singh, S., Kumar, P., Mor, S. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic: What can we learn for better air quality and human health? Journal of Infection and Public Health, 15(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIPH.2021.12.001
dc.relation.referencesReck, D. J., Hensher, D. A., Ho, C. Q. (2020). MaaS bundle design. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 141, 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2020.09.021
dc.relation.referencesRen, C., An, L., Gu, Z., Wang, Y., Gao, Y. (2020). Rebalancing the car-sharing system with reinforcement learning. World Wide Web, 23(4), 2491–2511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-020-00804-z
dc.relation.referencesRey-Moreno, M., Periáñez-Cristóbal, R., Calvo-Mora, A. (2022). Reflections on Sustainable Urban Mobility, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and Adoption Models. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010274
dc.relation.referencesRichter, N., Hunecke, M., Blumenschein, P. (2024). Beyond private-sphere pro-environmental action: Explaining shared mobility using the Theory of Planned Behavior and solidarity-oriented variables. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 107, 620–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2024.09.014
dc.relation.referencesRindone, C., Vitetta, A. (2024a). Measuring Potential People’s Acceptance of Mobility as a Service: Evidence from Pilot Surveys. Information, 15(6), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060333
dc.relation.referencesRindone, C., Vitetta, A. (2024b). Measuring Potential People’s Acceptance of Mobility as a Service: Evidence from Pilot Surveys. Information, 15(6), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060333
dc.relation.referencesRobles-Andrade, E., Soto-Flores, M. del R., Muñoz-Sánchez, C. (2023). Análisis comparativo de la movilidad sustentable en la CDMX y Santiago de Chile. Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales, 33. https://doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.33.2023.5594
dc.relation.referencesRosenthal, S., Tan, J. Y. C., Poh, T. F. (2020). Reputation Cues as Signals in the Sharing Economy. Social Sciences 2020, Vol. 9, Page 49, 9(4), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOCSCI9040049
dc.relation.referencesSalazar-Serna, K., Cadavid, L., Franco, C. J. (2024). Modeling Urban Transport Choices: Incorporating Sociocultural Aspects. http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21307
dc.relation.referencesSecretaría Distrital de Movilidad. (2024). Cartilla Encuesta de Movilidad 2023.
dc.relation.referencesShaheen, S. (2018). Shared Mobility: The Potential of Ridehailing and Pooling. In Three Revolutions (pp. 55–76). Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-906-7_3
dc.relation.referencesShaheen, S. A., Chan, N. D., Gaynor, T. (2016). Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: Understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations. Transport Policy, 51, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.003
dc.relation.referencesShaheen, S. A., Martin, E. W. (2011). Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America.
dc.relation.referencesShaheen, S., Chan, N. (2016). Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Overcome First-and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections. https://doi.org/10.7922/G2862DN3
dc.relation.referencesShaheen, S., Cohen, A. (2019). Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling. Transport Reviews, 39(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728
dc.relation.referencesShaheen, S., Cohen, A. (2021). Shared Mobility: An Overview of Definitions, Current Practices, and Its Relationship to Mobility on Demand and Mobility as a Service. International Encyclopedia of Transportation: Volume 1-7, 5, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10420-8
dc.relation.referencesShaheen, S., Cohen, A., Zohdy, I., Org, E. (2016). Shared Mobility Current Practices and Guiding Principles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gz3b3fx
dc.relation.referencesShamsuddoha, M., Kashem, M. A., Nasir, T. (2025). A Review of Transportation 5.0: Advancing Sustainable Mobility Through Intelligent Technology and Renewable Energy. Future Transportation 2025, Vol. 5, Page 8, 5(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/FUTURETRANSP5010008
dc.relation.referencesShen, Y., Li, M., Zhou, Y. (2025). Enhancing shared mobility via connected vehicle-driven dispatch and dynamic pricing. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 123, 110010. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPELECENG.2024.110010
dc.relation.referencesShevchuk, O., Berezka, K., Zakharchuk, O., Falovych, N., Siran, R. (2024). Institutional and legal aspects of regulating sustainable urban mobility. Central Ukrainian Scientific Bulletin. Technical Sciences, 2(9(40)), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.32515/2664-262X.2024.9(40).2.247-256
dc.relation.referencesShita, H., Novat, N., Kasubi, F., Novat, N. K., Alluri, P., Kwigizile, V. (2025). Age-related driver injury occurrence from crashes at curve–grade combined segments. Traffic Injury Prevention, 26(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2390093
dc.relation.referencesSimancas, W., Vinasco, C., Rosas-Satizábal, D., Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, H., Rodriguez-Valencia, A. (2024). Decision-making in open carpooling programs: Perspectives of drivers versus passengers. Travel Behaviour and Society, 36, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TBS.2024.100759
dc.relation.referencesSkedGo. (2024). ¿Qué es la movilidad como servicio (MaaS)? Definición, concepto y futuro de MaaS. https://skedgo.com/es/movilidad-como-servicio-maas/
dc.relation.referencesSmith, G., Sochor, J., Karlsson, I. C. M. (2019a). Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden. Public Management Review, 21(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1462399
dc.relation.referencesSmith, G., Sochor, J., Karlsson, I. C. M. (2019b). Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden. Public Management Review, 21(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1462399
dc.relation.referencesSochor, J., Arby, H., Karlsson, I. C. M. A., Sarasini, S. (2018a). A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: A proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 27, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.12.003
dc.relation.referencesSochor, J., Arby, H., Karlsson, I. C. M., Sarasini, S. (2018b). A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: A proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 27, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.12.003
dc.relation.referencesSovacool, B. K., Kim, J., Yang, M. (2021). The hidden costs of energy and mobility: A global meta-analysis and research synthesis of electricity and transport externalities. Energy Research and Social Science, 72, 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2020.101885
dc.relation.referencesSovacool, B. K., Upham, P., Martiskainen, M., Jenkins, K. E. H., Torres Contreras, G. A., Simcock, N. (2023). Policy prescriptions to address energy and transport poverty in the United Kingdom. Nature Energy, 8(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01196-w
dc.relation.referencesSpadaro, I., Pirlone, F. (2021). Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan and Health Security. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 4403, 13(8), 4403. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13084403
dc.relation.referencesStange, V., Behrens, L., Kuhlmann, K., Schräder, T., Johann Brettin, L., Maurer, M. (2024). Parents’ perspectives on transporting their children in autonomous vehicles – A contextual interview study with parents in Germany. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 107, 436–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2024.08.030
dc.relation.referencesStiglic, M., Agatz, N., Savelsbergh, M., Gradisar, M. (2016). Enhancing Urban Mobility: Integrating Ride-sharing and Public Transit. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2805342
dc.relation.referencesStyre, E., Johansson, F. (2025). From shared to residential mobility services? Carsharing and bike-sharing development under the influence of flexible parking requirements. Travel Behaviour and Society, 39, 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TBS.2024.100968
dc.relation.referencesSvenfelt, Å., Alfredsson, E. C., Bradley, K., Fauré, E., Finnveden, G., Fuehrer, P., Gunnarsson-Östling, U., Isaksson, K., Malmaeus, M., Malmqvist, T., Skånberg, K., Stigson, P., Aretun, Å., Buhr, K., Hagbert, P., Öhlund, E. (2019). Scenarios for sustainable futures beyond GDP growth 2050. Futures, 111, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUTURES.2019.05.001
dc.relation.referencesSystra, Cleuet, F.-M., Jehanno, A. (2023). “Developing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans-Guidelines for MobiliseYourCity geographies” Disclaimer: Introduction: mobility planning for MobiliseYourCity geographies 7. www.MobiliseYourCity.net
dc.relation.referencesSztangret, I. (2020). Systemic Sustainable Development in the Transport Service Sector. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 9525, 12(22), 9525. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12229525
dc.relation.referencesTammaru, T., Sevtsuk, A., Witlox, F. (2023). Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition. Journal of Transport Geography, 112, 103686. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2023.103686
dc.relation.referencesTanwar, R., Agarwal, P. K. (2025). Multimodal Integration in India: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies for Sustainable Urban Mobility. Multimodal Transportation, 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MULTRA.2025.100210
dc.relation.referencesTapia Gómez, M. (2018). LA CIUDAD, PARA QUIÉN: DESAFÍOS DE LA MOVILIDAD A LA PLANIFICACIÓN URBANA.
dc.relation.referencesTeal, R. F. (1987). Carpooling: Who, how and why. Transportation Research Part A: General, 21(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(87)90014-8
dc.relation.referencesTian, C., Tu, K., Sui, H., Sun, Q. (2024). Value co-creation in shared mobility: The case of carpooling in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123481. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2024.123481
dc.relation.referencesTomaino, G., Teow, J., Carmon, Z., Lee, L., Ben-Akiva, M., Chen, C., Leong, W. Y., Li, S., Yang, N., Zhao, J. (2020). Mobility as a service (MaaS): the importance of transportation psychology. Marketing Letters, 31(4), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09533-9
dc.relation.referencesTsai, Y. Te, Yu, C. H., Boonprakob, R. (2021). Assessing carpooling drivers and barriers: Evidence from Bangkok, Thailand. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.07.017
dc.relation.referencesTsao, H. S. J., Eirinaki, M. (2015). A Human-centered Credit-banking System for Convenient, Fair and Secure Carpooling Among Members of an Association. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3599–3606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROMFG.2015.07.729
dc.relation.referencesUrteaga, E. (2017). Reseña: La société hyper-industrielle de Pierre Veltz. Ensayos de Economía, 27(51), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.15446/ede.v27n51.69918
dc.relation.referencesUtriainen, R., Pöllänen, M. (2018). Review on mobility as a service in scientific publications. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 27, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RTBM.2018.10.005
dc.relation.referencesVan Der Waerden, P., Lem, A., Schaefer, W. (2015). Investigation of Factors that Stimulate Car Drivers to Change from Car to Carpooling in City Center Oriented Work Trips. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2015.09.083
dc.relation.referencesvan ’t Veer, R., Annema, J. A., Araghi, Y., Homem de Almeida Correia, G. van Wee, B. (2023). Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A latent class cluster analysis to identify Dutch vehicle owners’ use intention. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 169, 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2023.103608
dc.relation.referencesVanoutrive, T., Van De Vijver, E., Van Malderen, L., Jourquin, B., Thomas, I., Verhetsel, A., Witlox, F. (2012). What determines carpooling to workplaces in Belgium: Location, organisation, or promotion? Journal of Transport Geography, 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.006
dc.relation.referencesVargas, H., Rodríguez, A. (2023). Encuesta de Movilidad Uniandina. https://sostenibilidad.uniandes.edu.co/images/EMU22_ReporteResultados_Inicial.pdf
dc.relation.referencesVij, A., Dühr, S. (2022). The commercial viability of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): what’s in it for existing transport operators, and why should governments intervene? Transport Reviews, 42(5), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2028032
dc.relation.referencesWei, X., Yu, W., Wang, W., Zhao, D., Hua, X. (2020). Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Traffic Restriction Policy by Jointly Considering Carpool Exemptions. Sustainability, 12(18), 7734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187734
dc.relation.referencesWhittle, C., Whitmarsh, L., Hagger, P., Morgan, P., Parkhurst, G. (2019). User decision-making in transitions to electrified, autonomous, shared or reduced mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2018.12.014
dc.relation.referencesWitlox, F. (2024). Driving change: A comprehensive meta-analysis of community benefits in MaaS deployments across urban and rural landscapes. Journal of Public Transportation, 26, 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUBTR.2024.100105
dc.relation.referencesWright, S., Nelson, J. D., Cottrill, C. D. (2020). MaaS for the suburban market: Incorporating carpooling in the mix. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2019.09.034
dc.relation.referencesWu, C., Vine, S. Le, Sivakumar, A. (2025). Assessment of the barriers in establishing passenger mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) systems: An analogy with multimodal freight transport. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 20, 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSTP.2025.101433
dc.relation.referencesXia, J., Curtin, K. M., Huang, J., Wu, D., Xiu, W., Huang, Z. (2019). A carpool matching model with both social and route networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.01.008
dc.relation.referencesXie, K., Mao, Z. (2017). The impacts of quality and quantity attributes of Airbnb hosts on listing performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(9), 2240–2260. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2016-0345/FULL/XML
dc.relation.referencesXu, W., Sobhani, A., Fu, T., Khabooshani, A. M., Vazirinasab, A., Shokoohyar, S., Sobhani, A., Raouf, B. (2023). An analysis of ridesharing trip time using advanced text mining techniques. Digital Transportation and Safety, 2(4), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.48130/DTS-2023-0026
dc.relation.referencesYi, W., Yan, J. (2020). Energy consumption and emission influences from shared mobility in China: A national level annual data analysis. Applied Energy, 277, 115549. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2020.115549
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y., Kamargianni, M. (2022). A review on the factors influencing the adoption of new mobility technologies and services: autonomous vehicle, drone, micromobility and mobility as a service. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2119297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2119297
dc.relation.referencesZhao, Y., Hu, Y., Feng, T. (2025). Exploring the integration of urban air mobility into Mobility-as-a-Service: A stated preference analysis of commuters. Travel Behaviour and Society, 39, 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TBS.2025.100990
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.lembAUTOMOVILES-ASPECTOS SOCIALESspa
dc.subject.lembAutomobiles - social aspectseng
dc.subject.lembCAPACIDAD DE CARRETERASspa
dc.subject.lembHighway Capacityeng
dc.subject.lembFLUJO DE TRAFICOspa
dc.subject.lembTraffic floweng
dc.subject.lembINGENIERIA DEL TRANSITOspa
dc.subject.lembTraffic engineeringeng
dc.subject.lembRUIDO POR TRAFICOspa
dc.subject.lembTraffic noiseeng
dc.subject.lembCONDUCCION DE AUTOMOVILESspa
dc.subject.lembAutomobile drivingeng
dc.subject.proposalMovilidad sosteniblespa
dc.subject.proposalMovilidad compartidaspa
dc.subject.proposalMovilidad como servicio (MaaS)spa
dc.subject.proposalDesencadenantesspa
dc.subject.proposalMotivadoresspa
dc.subject.proposalBarrerasspa
dc.subject.proposalCarpoolingspa
dc.subject.proposalSustainable mobilityeng
dc.subject.proposalShared mobilityeng
dc.subject.proposalMobility as a service (MaaS)eng
dc.subject.proposalEnablerseng
dc.subject.proposalMotivatorseng
dc.subject.proposalBarrierseng
dc.titleCaracterización cualitativa de los factores incidentes presentes en los prestadores de servicios de movilidad compartida en la transición hacia un MaaS, bajo el enfoque de movilidad sosteniblespa
dc.title.translatedQualitative characterization of the incident factors present in shared mobility service providers in the transition towards a MaaS, under the sustainable mobility approacheng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMedios de comunicación
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticos
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
oaire.awardtitleIdentificación de factores desencadenantes, motivadores y barreras para la adopción de servicios de movilidad compartida en la transición hacia un MaaS
oaire.fundernameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1113668331.2025.pdf
Tamaño:
3.12 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería - Transporte

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: