Efecto de los incendios forestales sobre los ensamblajes de escarabajos coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en la transición bosque de galería-sabana, Vichada, Colombia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorArmenteras Pascual, Dolors
dc.contributor.advisorNoriega Alvarado, Jorge Ari
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Fonseca, Carlos Julian
dc.contributor.orcidMoreno Fonseca, Carlos Julian [0000000247858114]
dc.contributor.orcidArmenteras Pascual, Dolors [0000000309227298]
dc.contributor.orcidNoriega Alvarado, Jorge Ari [0000000317607020]
dc.contributor.researchgroupEcología del Paisaje y Modelación de Ecosistemas
dc.coverage.countryColombia
dc.coverage.regionVichada
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-04T15:00:45Z
dc.date.available2026-02-04T15:00:45Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionilustraciones a color, diagramas, fotografías, mapas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractEl fuego constituye una fuerza de disturbio que genera transformaciones profundas en los ecosistemas tropicales, particularmente en las transiciones entre bosques y sabanas, afectando su estructura y dinámica. En la Orinoquía colombiana, los bosques riparios y sabanas cumplen un papel estratégico como reservorios de biodiversidad y elementos de conectividad biogeográfica entre los Andes y la Amazonía. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los efectos de los incendios sobre el ensamblaje de escarabajos coprófagos en la transición bosque de galería–sabana. Para ello se integraron datos de sensores remotos sobre ocurrencia de incendios con información de campo y experimentos enfocados en las comunidades de escarabajos. Se analizó la respuesta de estos ensamblajes a nivel de composición (riqueza de especies y gremios), estructura (abundancia y diversidad) y función (remoción de excremento, movimiento de suelo y dispersión de semillas pequeñas y medianas) en escenarios contrastantes de régimen de fuego y conservación en dos reservas naturales. Los resultados mostraron que el impacto del fuego sobre los escarabajos coprófagos en bosques de galería es heterogéneo: en algunos casos disminuye la riqueza y abundancia, en otros aumenta, y en otros no se evidencian cambios significativos. Estas variaciones se relacionaron principalmente con la frecuencia y temporalidad de los incendios, así como con el grado de presión antrópica en cada reserva. Los hábitats con alta recurrencia de incendios y recientes focos de fuego en áreas sometidas a perturbación humana presentaron los efectos más notorios. En el ámbito funcional, se observó un efecto de compensación ejercido por especies pequeñas adaptadas a ambientes abiertos, lo que permitió mantener estables procesos clave como la remoción de excremento y suelo, y en menor medida la dispersión de semillas. El análisis temporal (22 años) evidenció un gradiente de recuperación funcional postfuego, en el cual los aportes a los servicios ecosistémicos se incrementaron con el tiempo transcurrido desde el último incendio. Asimismo, se encontró que la configuración del paisaje y el nivel de conservación influyen en la resiliencia de las comunidades, siendo determinante la presencia de áreas no quemadas como refugios para el mantenimiento de la funcionalidad. En conjunto, los hallazgos de esta tesis resaltan la relevancia de los escarabajos coprófagos como bioindicadores para comprender las respuestas al fuego en ecosistemas tropicales. Además, aportan insumos clave para el diseño de estrategias de monitoreo y gestión adaptativa del fuego, orientadas a la conservación de la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos a mediano y largo plazo en la Orinoquía colombiana. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractFire is a major disturbance force that drives structural and functional changes in tropical ecosystems, particularly at the ecotones between forests and savannas. In the Colombian Orinoquía, riparian forests and savannas act as key biodiversity reservoirs and provide ecological connectivity between the Andes and the Amazon. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fire on dung beetle assemblages in the gallery forest–savanna transition. We combined remote sensing data on fire occurrence with field surveys and experimental approaches to assess dung beetle responses at taxonomic (species richness and guilds), structural (abundance and diversity), and functional (dung removal, soil bioturbation, and dispersal of small and medium seeds) levels. Analyses were conducted across contrasting fire regimes and conservation contexts in two protected areas. Results revealed heterogeneous fire effects on dung beetle assemblages. In some cases, fire reduced richness and abundance; in others, it increased them, while in certain contexts no significant changes were detected. These patterns were strongly associated with fire frequency, time since last fire, and the degree of anthropogenic disturbance. Habitats with high fire recurrence combined with recent burning events in human-impacted forests showed the most pronounced effects. Functional assessments indicated compensatory responses by small, open-habitat species, which maintained stable levels of dung removal and soil turnover, with a lesser but positive contribution to seed dispersal. A temporal analysis covering 22 years revealed a functional recovery gradient, where ecosystem service provision increased with time elapsed since the last fire. Landscape configuration and conservation status were also key factors, as unburned refuges provided critical habitat heterogeneity and supported resilience. Overall, this thesis highlights the role of dung beetles as bioindicators of fire disturbance and provides valuable tools for long-term monitoring of ecosystem services. Findings contribute to adaptive fire management strategies aimed at biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes.eng
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Biología
dc.description.methodsSe realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica siguiendo la metodología PRISMA (Page et al., 2021) para identificar artículos relacionados con escarabajos de la familia Scarabaeidae e incendios durante el rango entre 1995-2023 (ventana de búsqueda de tiempo máximo). En primer lugar, se realizaron consultas bibliográficas en las bases de datos de Web of Science (WoS) y Scopus utilizando la cadena de palabras clave: (escarabajo* OR escarabajo pelotero* OR Scarabaeidae*) AND (“fuego* OR incendios* OR quemas*), a partir de las coincidencias en el título, resumen y/o palabras clave. De la búsqueda inicial, actualizada en febrero de 2024, se recuperaron un total de 1097 registros (WoS = 1062 y Scopus= 35). Seguido de esto, se efectuó la eliminación de registros duplicados, estudios fuera de los límites temáticos y experimentales. Se excluyeron a su vez todas las referencias no relacionadas con ninguna especie de escarabajo de la familia Scarabaeidae.
dc.description.researchareaEcología
dc.format.extent222 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/89388
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias - Doctorado en Ciencias - Biología
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, A., Gracia, M., Vayreda, J., & Retana, J. (2012). Patterns of fuel types and crown fire potential in Pinus halepensis forests in the Western Mediterranean Basin. Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.039
dc.relation.referencesAmézquita, S., & Favila, M. E. (2010). Removal rates of native and exotic dung by dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in a fragmented tropical rain forest. Environmental Entomology, 39(2), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09182
dc.relation.referencesAmore, V., Da Silva, P. G., Hensen, M. C., Hernández, M. I. M., & Lobo, J. M. (2018). Variation in dung removal by dung beetles in subtropical Atlantic Rainforests. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 166(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12724
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, D. J., Berson, J. D., Didham, R. K., Simmons, L. W., & Evans, T. A. (2024). Dung beetles increase plant growth: a meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 291(2019), 20232885. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPB.2023.2885
dc.relation.referencesAndresen, E. (1999). Seed dispersal by monkeys and the fate of dispersed seeds in a Peruvian Rain Forest. Biotropica, 31(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744- 7429.1999.tb00125.x
dc.relation.referencesAndresen, E. (2003). Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration. Ecography, 26(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03362.x
dc.relation.referencesAndresen, E. (2005). Effects of season and vegetation type on community organization of dung beetles in a tropical dry forest. Biotropica, 37(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744- 7429.2005.00039.X
dc.relation.referencesAndresen, E., & Laurance, S. G. W. (2007). Possible indirect effects of mammal hunting on dung beetle assemblages in Panama. Biotropica, 39
dc.relation.referencesAndresen, E., & Levey, D. J. (2004). Effects of dung and seed size on secondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees. Oecologia, 139(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1480-4
dc.relation.referencesAndresen, & Feer, F. (2005). The role of dung beetles as secondary seed dispersers and their effect on plant regeneration in tropical rainforests. Seed Fate: Predation, Dispersal and Seedling Establishment, 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851998060.0331
dc.relation.referencesAntunes, S. C., Curado, N., Castro, B. B., & Gonçalves, F. (2009). Short-term recovery of soil functional parameters and edaphic macro-arthropod community after a forest fire. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 9(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-009-0076-y
dc.relation.referencesArellano, L., & Castillo-Guevara, C. (2014). Efecto de los incendios forestales no controlados en el ensamble de escarabajos coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en un bosque templado del centro de México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85(3), 854–865. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.41756
dc.relation.referencesArmenteras, Bernal, Toro, González, Morales, Rivas, Pabón, Caicedo, Páramo, & Parra. (2011). Incendios de la cobertura vegetal en Colombia (A. P.- Lara, Ed.; 1st ed.). Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. http://gfmc.online/wp-content/uploads/Incendios-de- la-Cobertura-Vegetal-en-Colombia-Tomo-I-2011.pdf
dc.relation.referencesArmenteras, D., Barreto, J. S., Tabor, K., Molowny, R., & Retana, J. (2017). Changing patterns of fire occurrence in proximity to forest edges, roads and rivers between NW Amazonian countries. Biogeosciences Discussions, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2016-532
dc.relation.referencesArmenteras, D., González, T. M., & Retana, J. (2013). Forest fragmentation and edge influence on fire occurrence and intensity under different management types in Amazon forests. Biological Conservation, 159, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2012.10.026
dc.relation.referencesArmenteras, D., Meza, M. C., González, T. M., Oliveras, I., Balch, J. K., & Retana, J. (2021). Fire threatens the diversity and structure of tropical gallery forests. Ecosphere, 12(1), e03347. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECS2.3347
dc.relation.referencesArmenteras, D., Romero, M., & Galindo, G. (2005). Vegetation fire in the savannas of the World Resource Review Vol., 17(4), 531–543.
dc.relation.referencesArmenteras, D., Romero, M., & Galindo, G. (2005b). Vegetation fire in the savannas of the Llanos Orientales of Colombia. World Resource Review Vol., 17(4), 531–543. http://www.docentes.unal.edu.co/darmenterasp/docs/wrr Armenteras et al.pdf
dc.relation.referencesArmenteras-Pascual, D., Retana-Alumbreros, J., Molowny-Horas, R., Roman-Cuesta, R. M., González-Alonso, F., & Morales-Rivas, M. (2011). Characterising fire spatial pattern interactions with climate and vegetation in Colombia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.11.002
dc.relation.referencesArnan, X., Rodrigo, A., & Retana, J. (2006). Post-fire recovery of Mediterranean ground ant communities follows vegetation and dryness gradients. Journal of Biogeography, 33(7), 1246–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01506.x
dc.relation.referencesAuclerc, A., Le Moine, J. M., Hatton, P.-J., Bird, J. A., & Nadelhoffer, K. J. (2019). Decadal post- fire succession of soil invertebrate communities is dependent on the soil surface properties in a northern temperate forest. Science of The Total Environment, 647, 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.041
dc.relation.referencesAudino, L. D., Louzada, J., & Comita, L. (2014). Dung beetles as indicators of tropical forest restoration success: Is it possible to recover species and functional diversity? Biological Conservation, 169, 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.023
dc.relation.referencesBalázs, A., Bezděk, J., & Šipoš, J. (2024). Beetle assemblage distribution along edge–forest gradient in a managed oak forest. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 26(4), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/AFE.12640
dc.relation.referencesBarber, N. A., Hosler, S. C., Whiston, P., & Jones, H. P. (2019). Initial responses of dung beetle communities to Bison reintroduction in restored and remnant tallgrass prairie. Natural Areas Journal, 39(4), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.039.0405
dc.relation.referencesBarlow, J., Berenguer, E., Carmenta, R., & França, F. (2020). Clarifying Amazonia’s burning crisis. In Global Change Biology (Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp. 319–321). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14872
dc.relation.referencesBarlow, J., Lennox, G. D., Ferreira, J., Berenguer, E., Lees, A. C., Nally, R. Mac, Thomson, J. R., Ferraz, S. F. D. B., Louzada, J., Oliveira, V. H. F., Parry, L., Ribeiro De Castro Solar, R., Vieira, I. C. G., Aragaõ, L. E. O. C., Begotti, R. A., Braga, R. F., Cardoso, T. M., Jr, R. C. D. O., Souza, C. M., … Gardner, T. A. (2016). Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature, 535(7610), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18326
dc.relation.referencesBarlow, J., & Peres, C. A. (2004). Ecological responses to El Nino-induced surface fires in central Brazilian Amazonia: management implications for flammable tropical forests. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1443), 367– 380. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1423
dc.relation.referencesBarnes, A. D., Emberson, R. M., Chapman, H. M., Krell, F. T., & Didham, R. K. (2014). Matrix habitat restoration alters dung beetle species responses across tropical forest edges. Biological Conservation, 170, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2013.12.006
dc.relation.referencesBarragán, F., Moreno, C. E., Escobar, F., Halffter, G., & Navarrete, D. (2011). Negative Impacts of Human Land Use on Dung Beetle Functional Diversity. PLOS ONE, 6(3), e17976. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0017976
dc.relation.referencesBates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/JSS.V067.I01
dc.relation.referencesBeiroz, W., Slade, E. M., Barlow, J., Silveira, J. M., Louzada, J., & Sayer, E. (2017). Dung beetle community dynamics in undisturbed tropical forests: implications for ecological evaluations of land-use change. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 10(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ICAD.12206
dc.relation.referencesBell, A. J., Calladine, K. S., Wardle, D. A., & Phillips, I. D. (2022). Rapid colonization of the post- burn environment improves egg survival in pyrophilic ground beetles. Ecosphere, 13(8), e4213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4213
dc.relation.referencesBerlinck, C. N., & Batista, E. K. L. (2020). Good fire, bad fire: It depends on who burns. Flora, 268, 151610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151610
dc.relation.referencesBernardino, G. V. dos S., Mesquita, V. P., Bobrowiec, P. E. D., Iannuzzi, L., Salomão, R. P., & Cornelius, C. (2024). Habitat loss reduces abundance and body size of forest-dwelling dung beetles in an Amazonian urban landscape. Urban Ecosystems, 27(4), 1175–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01520-6
dc.relation.referencesBernaschini, M. L., Trumper, E., Valladares, G., & Salvo, A. (2019). Are all edges equal? Microclimatic conditions, geographical orientation and biological implications in a fragmented forest. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 280, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.035
dc.relation.referencesBeucke, K. (2009). Beetles (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae, Scarabaeidae, and Silphidae) in burned and unburned pine barrens in Long Island, New York. Entomologica Americana, 115(2), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1664/07-sn-008.1
dc.relation.referencesBirkett, A. J., Blackburn, G. A., & Menéndez, R. (2018). Linking species thermal tolerance to elevational range shifts in upland dung beetles. Ecography, 41(9), 1510–1519. https://doi.org/10.1111/ECOG.03458
dc.relation.referencesBitencourt, B. S., Dimas, T. M., Da Silva, P. G., & Morato, E. F. (2020). Forest complexity drives dung beetle assemblages along an edge-interior gradient in the southwest Amazon rainforest. Ecological Entomology, 45(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/EEN.12795
dc.relation.referencesBogoni, J. A., da Silva, P. G., & Peres, C. A. (2019). Co-declining mammal–dung beetle faunas throughout the Atlantic Forest biome of South America. Ecography, 42(11), 1803–1818. https://doi.org/10.1111/ECOG.04670
dc.relation.referencesBohle, M., Damborsky, M., Bar, M., & Ocampo, F. (2009). Registros y distribución de la especie afroasiática Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) en Argentina. Revista de La Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, 68, 373–376.
dc.relation.referencesBond, W. J. (2010). Do nutrient-poor soils inhibit development of forests? A nutrient stock analysis. Plant and Soil, 334(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0440-0
dc.relation.referencesBowman, D. M. J. S., Balch, J. K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W. J., Carlson, J. M., Cochrane, M. A., D’Antonio, C. M., DeFries, R. S., Doyle, J. C., Harrison, S. P., Johnston, F. H., Keeley, J. E., Krawchuk, M. A., Kull, C. A., Marston, J. B., Moritz, M. A., Prentice, I. C., Roos, C. I., Scott, A. C., … Pyne, S. J. (2009). Fire in the Earth System. Science, 324(5926), 481–484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163886
dc.relation.referencesBowman, D., O’Brien, J., & Goldammer, J. G. (2013). Pyrogeography and the global quest for sustainable fire management. Ssrn. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-082212- 134049
dc.relation.referencesBraga, R. F., Korasaki, V., Andresen, E., & Louzada, J. (2013). Dung beetle community and functions along a habitat-disturbance gradient in the Amazon: A rapid assessment of ecological functions associated to Biodiversity. PLOS ONE, 8(2), e57786. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0057786
dc.relation.referencesBriceño, D. R. (2004). La biodiversidad en la ecorregión de los Llanos de Venezuela y las prioridades para su conservación. Ecosistemas, 13(2).
dc.relation.referencesBrooks, M., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K., Magnusson, A., Berg, C., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H., Mächler, M., & Bolker, B. (2017). glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. R Journal, 9, 378–400. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066
dc.relation.referencesBrown, J., Scholtz, C. H., Janeau, J.-L., Grellier, S., & Podwojewski, P. (2010). Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) can improve soil hydrological properties. Applied Soil Ecology, 46(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSOIL.2010.05.010
dc.relation.referencesBrowne, J., & Scholtz, C. H. (1998). Evolution of the scarab hindwing articulation and wing base: a contribution toward the phylogeny of the Scarabaeidae (Scarabaeoidea: Coleoptera). Systematic Entomology, 23(4), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 3113.1998.00059.x
dc.relation.referencesBui, V. B., Ziegler, T., & Bonkowski, M. (2020). Morphological traits reflect dung beetle response to land use changes in tropical karst ecosystems of Vietnam. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105697. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2019.105697
dc.relation.referencesCáceres, M. De, & Legendre, P. (2009). Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology, 90(12), 3566–3574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, J. W., Grodsky, S. M., Keller, O., Vigueira, C. C., Vigueira, P. A., Waite, E. S., & Greenberg, C. H. (2018). Response of beetles (Coleoptera) to repeated applications of prescribed fire and other fuel reduction techniques in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, 429, 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2018.07.022
dc.relation.referencesCano, E. B. (1998). Deltochilum valgum acropyge Bates (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae): habits and distribution. Coleopterists Bulletin, 52(2), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/4009382
dc.relation.referencesCarrión-Paladines, V., Fries, A., Muñoz, A., Castillo, E., García-Ruiz, R., & Marín-Armijos, D. (2021). Effects of land-use change on the community structure of the dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) in an altered ecosystem in Southern Ecuador. Insects 2021, Vol. 12, Page 306, 12(4), 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/INSECTS12040306
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, R. L., Andresen, E., Barônio, G. J., Oliveira, V. H. F., Louzada, J., & Braga, R. F. (2020). Is dung removal a good proxy for other dung beetle functions when monitoring for conservation? A case study from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Indicators, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105841
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, R. L., Weir, T., Vasconcelos, H. L., & Andersen, A. N. (2020). Dung beetles of an Australian tropical savanna: Species composition, food preferences and responses to experimental fire regimes. Austral Ecology, 45(7), 958–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12910
dc.relation.referencesCastellanos, M. C., S, F. E., & Stevenson, P. R. (1999). Dung Beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) Attracted to Woolly Monkey (Lagothrix lagothricha Humboldt) Dung at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 53(2), 155–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4009396
dc.relation.referencesCerling, T. E., Wang, Y., & Quade, J. (1993). Expansion of C4 ecosystems as an indicator of global ecological change in the late Miocene. Nature, 361(6410), 344–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/361344a0
dc.relation.referencesChafer, C. J., Noonan, M., & Macnaught, E. (2004). The post-fire measurement of fire severity and intensity in the Christmas 2001 Sydney wildfires. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 13(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF03041
dc.relation.referencesChao, A., & Jost, L. (2012). Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology, 93(12), 2533–2547. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1952.1
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y., Morton, D. C., Jin, Y., Collatz, G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., van der Werf, G. R., DeFries, R. S., & Randerson, J. T. (2013). Long-term trends and interannual variability of forest, savanna and agricultural fires in South America. Carbon Management, 4(6), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.61
dc.relation.referencesChin, K., & Gill, B. D. (1996). Dinosaurs, Dung Beetles, and Conifers: Participants in a Cretaceous Food Web. PALAIOS, 11(3), 280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3515235
dc.relation.referencesChown, S. L., & Klok, J. (2011). The Ecological Implications of Physiological Diversity in Dung Beetles. In Ecology and Evolution of Dung Beetles (pp. 200–219). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342000.ch10
dc.relation.referencesClarke, K. R., Somerfield, P. J., & Chapman, M. G. (2006). On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray–Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 330(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.017
dc.relation.referencesCochrane, M. A. (2003). Fire science for rainforests. Nature, 421(6926), 913–919. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01437
dc.relation.referencesCochrane, M. A. (2009). Tropical fire ecology: climate change, land use, and ecosystem dynamics. Choice Reviews Online, 47(03), 47–1397. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.47- 1397
dc.relation.referencesCochrane, M. A., Cochrane, M. A., & Ryan, K. C. (2009). Fire and fire ecology: Concepts and principles. Tropical Fire Ecology, 25–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77381-8_2
dc.relation.referencesConard, S. G., Sukhinin, A. I., Stocks, B. J., Cahoon, D. R., Davidenko, E. P., & Ivanova, G. A. (2002). Determining effects of area burned and fire severity on carbon cycling and emissions in Siberia. 55(1), 197-211.
dc.relation.referencesCorrea, C. M. A., Audino, L. D., Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z., & Louzada, J. (2022). Diversity and structure of dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) assemblage in natural grasslands of the Brazilian Pantanal. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 42(5), 3253–3261. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42690-022-00805-7/FIGURES/4
dc.relation.referencesCorrea, H. D, Ruiz, S. L. y Arévalo, L. M., Avila, P. G., Fundación, R., & Trujillo, O.-F. (2005). Plan de acción en biodiversidad de la cuenca del Orinoco – Colombia 2005 - 2015 PROPUESTA TÉCNICA.
dc.relation.referencesCorrea-Gómez, D. F., & Stevenson, P. R. (2010). Estructura y diversidad de bosques de galería en una sabana estacional de los llanos orientales colombianos (Reserva tomo grande, Vichada). Orinoquia, 14, 31–48. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121- 37092010000300004&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
dc.relation.referencesCosta, A. D. G., Lima, G. S., Torres, F. T. P., Rodríguez, V. B., da Silva Júnior, M. R., & de Almeida, M. P. (2023). Causes and period of occurrence of forest fires in Brazilian federal protected areas from 2006 to 2012. 1-16. Ciencia Florestal, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509869028
dc.relation.referencesCuesta, E., & Lobo, J. M. (2019). A comparison of dung beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) collected 34 years apart in an Iberian mountain locality. Journal of Insect Conservation, 23(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-00119-5
dc.relation.referencesda Silva, & Hernández. (2015). Scale-dependence of processes structuring dung beetle metacommunities using functional diversity and community deconstruction approaches. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0123030. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0123030
dc.relation.referencesda Silva, P. G., & Hernández, M. I. M. (2014). Local and regional effects on community structure of dung beetles in a mainland-island scenario. PLOS ONE, 9(10), e111883. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.011188
dc.relation.referencesda Silva, P. G., Nunes, C. A., Ferreira, L. F., Braga, R. F., Beiroz, W., Perillo, L. N., Solar, R. R. C. C., & de Siqueira Neves, F. (2019). Patch and landscape effects on forest-dependent dung beetles are masked by matrix-tolerant dung beetles in a mountaintop rainforest archipelago. Science of The Total Environment, 651, 1321–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.195
dc.relation.referencesDabrowski, J., Venter, G., Truter, W. F., & Scholtz, C. H. (2019). Dung beetles can tunnel into highly compacted soils from reclaimed mined sites in eMalahleni, South Africa. Applied Soil Ecology, 134, 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.10.015
dc.relation.referencesDavis, A. J., Hanski, I., & Cambefort, Y. (1991). Dung Beetle Ecology. In: I. Hanski & Y. Cambefort (Eds.), The Journal of Animal Ecology (Vol. 62, Issue 2). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/5374
dc.relation.referencesDavis, A. L. V., Van Aarde, R. J., Scholtz, C. H., & Delport, J. H. (2002). Increasing representation of localized dung beetles across a chronosequence of regenerating vegetation and natural dune forest in South Africa. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1466-822X.2002.00283.X
dc.relation.referencesDavis, A., & Philips, T. (2005). Effect of deforestation on a southwest Ghana dung beetle assemblage (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) at the periphery of Ankasa Conservation Area. Environmental Entomology, 34, 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/34.5.1081
dc.relation.referencesDavis, A. L. V, van Aarde, R. J., Scholtz, C. H., & Delport, J. H. (2002). Increasing representation of localized dung beetles across a chronosequence of regenerating vegetation and natural dune forest in South Africa. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00283.x
dc.relation.referencesde Andrade, R. B., Barlow, J., Louzada, J., Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z., Silveira, J. M., & Cochrane, M. A. (2014). Tropical forest fires and biodiversity: dung beetle community and biomass responses in a northern Brazilian Amazon forest. Journal of Insect Conservation, 18(6), 1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9719-4
dc.relation.referencesde Andrade, R. B., Barlow, J., Louzada, J., Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z., Souza, M., Silveira, J. M., & Cochrane, M. A. (2011). Quantifying responses of dung beetles to fire disturbance in tropical forests: The importance of trapping method and seasonality. PLoS ONE, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026208
dc.relation.referencesDe Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
dc.relation.referencesde Moura, R. S., Noriega, J. A., Cerboncini, R. A. S., Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z., & Klemann Junior, L. (2021). Dung beetles in a tight-spot, but not so much: Quick recovery of dung beetles assemblages after low-impact selective logging in Central Brazilian Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management, 494, 119301. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2021.119301
dc.relation.referencesDe Oca T, E. M., & Halffter, G. (1995). Daily and seasonal activities of a guild of the coprophagous, burrowing beetle (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae Scarabaeinae) in tropical grassland. Tropical Zoology, 8(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03946975.1995.10539277
dc.relation.referencesdeCastro-Arrazola, I., Andrew, N. R., Berg, M. P., Curtsdotter, A., Lumaret, J. P., Menéndez, R., Moretti, M., Nervo, B., Nichols, E. S., Sánchez-Piñero, F., Santos, A. M. C., Sheldon, K. S., Slade, E. M., & Hortal, J. (2023). A trait-based framework for dung beetle functional ecology. Journal of Animal Ecology, 92(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2656.13829
dc.relation.referencesdeCastro-Arrazola, I., Hortal, J., Noriega, J. A., & Sánchez-Piñero, F. (2020). Assessing the functional relationship between dung beetle traits and dung removal, burial, and seedling emergence. Ecology, 101(10), e03138. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECY.3138
dc.relation.referencesDelaney, E. J. (2009). Tropical fire ecology: climate change, land use, and ecosystem dynamics. In Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries (Vol. 47, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77381-8
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, C., Gervásio Pereira, M., Armenteras-Pascual, D., Garcia-Suabita, W., Sebastian Garcia-Samaca, A., & Reyes-Palacios, A. (2025). Tree Functional Traits’ Responses to Forest Edges and Fire in the Savanna Landscapes of Northern South America. Forests . 1616(2), 208??. https://doi.org/10.3390/F16020208
dc.relation.referencesDoamba, S. W. M. F., Savadogo, P., & Nacro, H. B. (2014). Effects of burning on soil macrofauna in a savanna-woodland under different experimental fuel load treatments. Applied Soil Ecology, 81, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.04.005
dc.relation.referencesDodonov, P., Menezes, G. S. C., Caitano, B., Cazetta, E., & Mielke, M. S. (2019). Air and soil temperature across fire-created edges in a Neotropical rainforest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 276–277, 107606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.06.005
dc.relation.referencesDole, H. E., Villamarin-Cortez, S., & Richards, L. A. (2023). Facing the flames: insect responses to megafires and changing fire regimes. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 60, 101129. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COIS.2023.101129
dc.relation.referencesDonohue, I., Petchey, O. L., Montoya, J. M., Jackson, A. L., Mcnally, L., Viana, M., Healy, K., Lurgi, M., O’Connor, N. E., & Emmerson, M. C. (2013). On the dimensionality of ecological stability. Ecology Letters, 16( 4), 421–429 https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12086
dc.relation.referencesDosso, K., Konate, S., Akoua, T., Kouakou, M., Dembele, A., Aidara, D., & Linsenmair, K. E. (2013). The study of unburned savanna sections serving as temporary refuges for insects. An experiment in a tropical humid savanna in Côte d’Ivoire. www.biosciences.elewa.org
dc.relation.referencesDoube, B. M. (1990). A functional classification for analysis of the structure of dung beetle assemblages. Ecological Entomology, 15(4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2311.1990.tb00820.x
dc.relation.referencesDray, S., Pélissier, R., Couteron, P., Fortin, M. J., Legendre, P., Peres-Neto, P. R., Bellier, E., Bivand, R., Blanchet, F. G., De Cáceres, M., Dufour, A. B., Heegaard, E., Jombart, T., Munoz, F., Oksanen, J., Thioulouse, J., & Wagner, H. H. (2012). Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecological Monographs, 82(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1183.1
dc.relation.referencesDriscoll, D. A., & Weir, T. (2005). Beetle responses to habitat fragmentation depend on ecological traits, habitat condition, and remnant size. Conservation Biology, 19(1), 182– 194. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1523-
dc.relation.referencesDufrêne, M., & Legendre, P. (1997). Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2
dc.relation.referencesDutra, D. J., Anderson, L. O., Fearnside, P. M., Graça, P. M. L. de A., Yanai, A. M., Dalagnol, R., Burton, C., Jones, C., Betts, R., & Aragão, L. E. O. e. C. de. (2023). Fire Dynamics in an Emerging Deforestation Frontier in Southwestern Amazonia, Brazil. Fire, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6010002
dc.relation.referencesEdmonds, W. D., & Zídek, J. (2012). Taxonomy of Phanaeus revisited: Revised keys to and comments on species of the New World dung beetle genus Phanaeus MacLeay, 1819 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Phanaeini). Insecta Mundi, 2012(0271–0276), 1–108.
dc.relation.referencesEngstrom, R. T. (2010). First-order fire effects on animals: Review and recommendations. Fire Ecology, 6(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0601115
dc.relation.referencesEscobar, S. F. (2003). Feeding habits and distributional records of 11 species of Neotropical Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Https://Doi.Org/10.1649/642, 57(2), 131–132. https://doi.org/10.1649/642
dc.relation.referencesEsquivel-román, A., Baena-díaz, F., Bustos-segura, C., & González-Tokman, D. (2023). Synergistic effects of elevated temperature with pesticides on reproduction, development and survival of dung beetles. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-3740664/V1
dc.relation.referencesEstrada, A., & Coates-Estrada, R. (2002). Dung beetles in continuous forest, forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11(11), 1903–1918. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020896928578/METRICS
dc.relation.referencesEvans, A. V. (2010). The African Dung Beetle Genera. In The Coleopterists Bulletin (Vol. 64, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065x-64.4.394
dc.relation.referencesFahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34(1), 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
dc.relation.referencesFauth, J. E., Bernardo, J., Camara, M., Resetarits, W. J., Van Buskirk, J., & McCollum, S. A. (1996). Simplifying the jargon of community ecology: A conceptual approach. American Naturalist, 147(2), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.1086/285850
dc.relation.referencesFavila, M. E., & Halffter, G. (1997). The use of indicator groups for measuring biodiversity as related to community structure and function. Acta Zoologica Mexicana, 72, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.1997.72721734
dc.relation.referencesFeer, F. (1999). Effects of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) on seeds dispersed by howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in the French Guianan rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 15(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467499000711
dc.relation.referencesFidelis, A. (2020). Is fire always the “bad guy”? Flora, 268, 151611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151611
dc.relation.referencesFilgueiras, B. K. C., Peres, C. A., Iannuzzi, L., Tabarelli, M., & Leal, I. R. (2021). Recovery of dung beetle assemblages in regenerating Caatinga dry forests following slash-and-burn agriculture. Forest Ecology and Management, 496, 119423. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2021.11942
dc.relation.referencesFinney, M. A. (2001). Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior. Forest Science, 47(2), 219-228.
dc.relation.referencesFloate, K. D., Watson, D. W., Weiss, R. M., & Olfert, O. (2017). Bioclimatic analyses for the distributions of Onthophagus nuchicornis, Onthophagus taurus, and Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in North America. The Canadian Entomologist, 149(4), 504–524. https://doi.org/10.4039/TCE.2017.20
dc.relation.referencesFrança, F. M., Ferreira, J., Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z., Maia, L. F., Berenguer, E., Ferraz Palmeira, A., Fadini, R., Louzada, J., Braga, R., Hugo Oliveira, V., & Barlow, J. (2020). El Niño impacts on human-modified tropical forests: Consequences for dung beetle diversity and associated ecological processes. Biotropica, 52(2), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/BTP.12756
dc.relation.referencesFranke, J., Barradas, A. C. S., Borges, M. A., Menezes Costa, M., Dias, P. A., Hoffmann, A. A., Orozco Filho, J. C., Melchiori, A. E., & Siegert, F. (2018). Fuel load mapping in the Brazilian Cerrado in support of integrated fire management. Remote Sensing of Environment, 217, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.018
dc.relation.referencesFuzessy, L. F., Benítez-López, A., Slade, E. M., Bufalo, F. S., Magro-de-Souza, G. C., Pereira, L. A., & Culot, L. (2021). Identifying the anthropogenic drivers of declines in tropical dung beetle communities and functions. Biological Conservation, 256, 109063. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2021.109063
dc.relation.referencesGarcia-Suabita, W., Pacheco, M. J., & Armenteras, D. (2024). Multitemporal dynamics of fuels in forest systems present in the Colombian Orinoco river basin forests. Fire, 7(6), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/FIRE7060171
dc.relation.referencesGardner, T. A., Hernández, M. I. M., Barlow, J., & Peres, C. A. (2008). Understanding the biodiversity consequences of habitat change: the value of secondary and plantation forests for neotropical dung beetles. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(3), 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2664.2008.01454.X
dc.relation.referencesGeorgieva, S., Christensen, S., Petersen, H., Gjelstrup, P., & Thorup-Kristensen, K. (2005). Early decomposer assemblages of soil organisms in litterbags with vetch and rye roots. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37(6), 1145–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.012
dc.relation.referencesGigliotti, M. S., Togni, P. H. B., & Frizzas, M. R. (2023). Attractiveness of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) to faeces from native mammals in different trophic guilds. Austral Ecology, 48(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/AEC.13253
dc.relation.referencesGillard, P. (1967). Coprophagous beetles in pasture ecosystems. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 33(1), 30-34.
dc.relation.referencesGiller, P. S., & Doube, B. M. (1989). Experimental Analysis of Inter- and Intraspecific Competition in Dung Beetle Communities. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 58(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.2307/4990
dc.relation.referencesGiménez Gómez, V. C., Verdú, J. R., Casanoves, F., & Zurita, G. A. (2022). Functional responses to anthropogenic disturbance and the importance of selected traits: A study case using dung beetles. Ecological Entomology, 47(4), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/EEN.13135
dc.relation.referencesGiménez Gómez, V. C., Verdú, J. R., Guerra Alonso, C. B., & Zurita, G. A. (2018). Relationship between land uses and diversity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the southern Atlantic forest of Argentina: which are the key factors? Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(12), 3201–3213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1597-8
dc.relation.referencesGiménez Gómez, V. C., Verdú, J. R., & Zurita, G. A. (2020). Thermal niche helps to explain the ability of dung beetles to exploit disturbed habitats. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70284-8
dc.relation.referencesGittings, T., & Giller, P. S. (1997). Life history traits and resource utilisation in an assemblage of north temperate Aphodius dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecography, 20(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0587.1997.TB00347.X
dc.relation.referencesGittings, T., & Giller, P. S. (1998). Resource quality and the colonisation and succession of coprophagous dung beetles. Ecography, 21(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600- 0587.1998.TB00550.X
dc.relation.referencesGómez-González, S., Paula, S., Cavieres, L. A., & Pausas, J. G. (2017). Postfire responses of the woody flora of Central Chile: Insights from a germination experiment. PLOS ONE, 12(7), e0180661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180661
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves, T. F., Correa, C. M. A., Audino, L. D., Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z., Fontoura, F. M., & Guedes, N. M. R. (2022). Quantifying the post-fire recovery of taxonomic and functional diversity of dung beetles in the Brazilian Pantanal. Ecological Entomology, 47(4), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/EEN.13144
dc.relation.referencesGongalsky, K. B., & Persson, T. (2013). Recovery of soil macrofauna after wildfires in boreal forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 57, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.005
dc.relation.referencesGongalsky, K. B., & Zaitsev, A. S. (2016). The role of spatial heterogeneity of the environment in soil fauna recovery after fires. Doklady Earth Sciences, 471(2), 1265–1268. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X16120035
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, T. M., González-Trujillo, J. D., Muñoz, A., & Armenteras, D. (2022). Effects of fire history on animal communities: a systematic review. Ecolo
dc.relation.referencesGosz, J. R. (1993). Ecotone hierarchies. Ecological Applications, 3(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941905
dc.relation.referencesGunter, N. L., Weir, T. A., Slipinksi, A., Bocak, L., & Cameron, S. L. (2016). If dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) arose in association with dinosaurs, did they also suffer a mass co-extinction at the K-Pg boundary? PloS One, 11(5), e0153570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153570
dc.relation.referencesHaddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. D., Lovejoy, T. E., Sexton, J. O., Austin, M. P., Collins, C. D., Cook, W. M., Damschen, E. I., Ewers, R. M., Foster, B. L., Jenkins, C. N., King, A. J., Laurance, W. F., Levey, D. J., Margules, C. R., … Townshend, J. R. (2015). Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances, 1(2), e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052
dc.relation.referencesHalffter & Favila. (1993). The Scarabaeinae an Animal Group for Analyzing, inventorying and Monitoring Biodiversity in Tropical Rainforest and Modified Landscapes. Biology International. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261795848_Halffter_G_Favila_ME_The_Scaraba einae_Insecta_Coleoptera_an_animal_group_for_analysing_inventorying_and_monitoring _biodiversity_in_tropical_rainforest_and_modified_landscapes_Biology_International
dc.relation.referencesHalffter, G., & Edmonds, W. (1982). The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae). An Ecological and Evolutive Approach, 10. Instituto de Ecología, A. C. México
dc.relation.referencesHalffter, G., & Favila, M. E. (2023). The relationships between dung beetles and monkeys in the Neotropical region. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 1212879. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEVO.2023.1212879/BIBTEX
dc.relation.referencesHalffter, G., Favila, M., & Halffter, V. (1992). A comparative study of the structure of the scarab guild in Mexican tropical rain forests and derived ecosystems. Folia Entomologica Mexicana, 84, 131–156.
dc.relation.referencesHalffter, G., & Halffter, V. (1989). Behavioral evolution of the non-rolling roller beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) ( 32), 1–52.
dc.relation.referencesHalffter, & Matthews, E. G. (1966). The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomologica Mexicana, 45(2), 426–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnz.19690450211
dc.relation.referencesHardesty, J., Myers, R., & Fulks, W. (2005). Fire, ecosystems and people: A preliminary assessment of fire as a global conservation issue. The George Wright Forum, 22(4), 10.
dc.relation.referencesHarper, K. A., Drapeau, P., Lesieur, D., & Bergeron, Y. (2014). Forest structure and composition at fire edges of different ages: Evidence of persistent structural features on the landscape. Forest Ecology and Management, 314, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.009
dc.relation.referencesHarper, K. A., Macdonald, S. E., Burton, P. J., Chen, J., Brosofske, K. D., Saunders, S. C., Euskirchen, E. S., Roberts, D., Jaiteh, M. S., & Esseen, P. A. (2005). Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology ( 19 ( 3), 768–782 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x
dc.relation.referencesHasan, F., Wallace, K. J., Fowler, S. V., Schipper, L. A., Hemmings, Z., Berson, J. D., & Barnes, A. D. (2024). Dung beetles drive direct and indirect changes in ecosystem multifunctionality. Functional Ecology, 38(9), 1971–1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2435.14607
dc.relation.referencesHea, S. B., Lee, J. H., Oh, S. K., Young, E. N., Yong, S. J., & Won, H. K. (2005). Effects of paracoprid dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on the growth of pasture herbage and on the underlying soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 29(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.11.001
dc.relation.referencesHernández, J., & Sánchez, H. (1992). Biomas terrestres de Colombia. In G. Halffter (Ed.), La Diversidad Biológica de Iberoamérica I. Volumen Especial (pp. 153–173). Acta Zoológica Mexicana.
dc.relation.referencesHiggins, S. I., Bond, W. J., & Trollope, W. S. W. (2000). Fire, resprouting and variability: a recipe for grass-tree coexistence in savanna. Journal of Ecology, 88(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00435.x
dc.relation.referencesHoffmann, W. A., Adasme, R., Haridasan, M., De Carvalho, M. T., Geiger, E. L., Pereira, M. A. B., Gotsch, S. G., & Franco, A. C. (2009). Tree topkill, not mortality, governs the dynamics of savanna-forest boundaries under frequent fire in central Brazil. Ecology, 90(5), 1326– 1337. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0741.1
dc.relation.referencesHoffmann, W. A., Geiger, E. L., Gotsch, S. G., Rossatto, D. R., Silva, L. C. R., Lau, O. L., Haridasan, M., & Franco, A. C. (2012). Ecological thresholds at the savanna-forest boundary: how plant traits, resources and fire govern the distribution of tropical biomes. Ecology Letters, 15(7), 759–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01789.x
dc.relation.referencesHofmeister, J., Hošek, J., Brabec, M., Střalková, R., Mýlová, P., Bouda, M., Pettit, J. L., Rydval, M., & Svoboda, M. (2019). Microclimate edge effect in small fragments of temperate forests in the context of climate change. Forest Ecology and Management, 448, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.069
dc.relation.referencesHolley, J. M., & Andrew, N. R. (2019). Experimental warming alters the relative survival and emigration of two dung beetle species from an Australian dung pat community. Austral Ecology, 44(5), 800–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/AEC.12750
dc.relation.referencesHolmquist, A. J., Cody Markelz, R. J., Martinez, C. C., & Gillespie, R. G. (2024). The importance of habitat type and historical fire regimes in arthropod community response following large- scale wildfires. Global Change Biology, 30(1), e17135. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCB.17135
dc.relation.referencesHolter, P., Scholtz, C. H., & Wardhaugh, K. G. (2002). Dung feeding in adult scarabaeines (tunnellers and endocoprids): even large dung beetles eat small particles. Ecological Entomology, 27(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00399.x
dc.relation.referencesHorgan, F. (2008). Dung beetle assemblages in forests and pastures of El Salvador: A functional comparison. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 2961–2978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9408-2
dc.relation.referencesHorgan, F. G. (2001). Burial of bovine dung by coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from horse and cow grazing sites in El Salvador. European Journal of Soil Biology, 37(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01073-1
dc.relation.referencesHorgan, F. G., & Fuentes, R. C. (2005). Asymmetrical competition between Neotropical dung beetles and its consequences for assemblage structure. Ecological Entomology, 30(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0307-6946.2005.00673.X
dc.relation.referencesHosler, S. C., Jones, H. P., Nelson, M., & Barber, N. A. (2021). Management actions shape dung beetle community structure and functional traits in restored tallgrass prairie. Ecological Entomology, 46(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/EEN.12950
dc.relation.referencesHsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H., & Chao, A. (2016). iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(12), 1451–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12613
dc.relation.referencesHuerta, C., Martínez, M. I., de Oca, E. M., Cruz-Rosales, M., & Favila, M. E. (2013). The role of dung beetles in the sustainability of pasture and grasslands. WIT Transactions on State-of-the-art in Science and Engineering, 64.
dc.relation.referencesIves, A. R., & Carpenter, S. R. (2007). Stability and diversity of ecosystems. In Science (Vol. 317, Issue 5834, pp. 58–62). American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133258
dc.relation.referencesJost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2006.0030-1299.14714.X
dc.relation.referencesJost, L. (2007). Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology, 88(10), 2427–2439. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1736.1
dc.relation.referencesKazuhira, Y., Hdeaki, K., Takuro, K., & Toshiharu, A. (1991). Nitrogen mineralization and microbial populations in cow dung, dung balls and underlying soil affected by paracoprid dung beetles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 23(7), 649–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038- 0717(91)90078-X
dc.relation.referencesKeane, R. E., Burgan, R., & van Wagtendonk, J. (2001). [No Title]. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 10(4), 301. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF01028
dc.relation.referencesKirkpatrick, W. H., & Sheldon, K. S. (2022). Experimental increases in temperature mean and variance alter reproductive behaviours in the dung beetle Phanaeus vindex. Biology Letters, 18(7), 20220109. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSBL.2022.0109
dc.relation.referencesKohlmann, B., & Sanchez-Colon, S. (1984). Structure of a Scarabaeinae Community: A Numerical-Behavioural Study (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). Acta Zoologica Mexicana, 2, 1– 25.
dc.relation.referencesKoltz, A. M., Burkle, L. A., Pressler, Y., Dell, J. E., Vidal, M. C., Richards, L. A., & Murphy, S. M. (2018). Global change and the importance of fire for the ecology and evolution of insects. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 29, 110–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.07.015
dc.relation.referencesKorasaki, V., Lopes, J., Gardner Brown, G., & Louzada, J. (2013). Using dung beetles to evaluate the effects of urbanization on Atlantic Forest biodiversity. Insect Science, 20(3), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-7917.2012.01509.X
dc.relation.referencesKruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289694/METRICS
dc.relation.referencesKuchenbecker, J., Camarota, F., da Silva, P. G., Perillo, L. N., do Vale Beirão, M., de Castro, F. S., Fernandes, G. W., do Espírito-Santo, M. M., Santos, N. C., Cardoso, I. G. S., & Neves, F. de S. (2023). Differential response of fire on the community dynamics of five insect taxa in a tropical mountaintop forest archipelago. Ecology and Evolution, 13(12), e10806. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECE3.10806
dc.relation.referencesLaCroix, J. J., Li, Q., Chen, J., Henderson, R., & John, R. (2008). Edge effects on fire spread in a disturbed Northern Wisconsin landscape. Landscape Ecology, 23(9), 1081–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9265-0
dc.relation.referencesLarsen, T. H., Lopera, A., & Forsyth, A. (2008). Understanding trait-dependent community disassembly: dung beetles, density functions, and forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 22(5), 1288–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00969.x
dc.relation.referencesLarsen, T. H., Lopera, A., Forsyth, A., & Génier, F. (2009). From coprophagy to predation: a dung beetle that kills millipedes. Biology Letters, 5(2), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0654
dc.relation.referencesLarsen, T. H., Williams, N. M., & Kremen, C. (2005). Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters, 8(5), 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00749.x
dc.relation.referencesLaurance, W. F., Didham, R. K., & Power, M. E. (2001). Ecological boundaries: A search for synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16(2), 70–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169- 5347(00)02070-X
dc.relation.referencesLavelle, P., Decaëns, T., Aubert, M., Barot, S., Blouin, M., Bureau, F., Margerie, P., Mora, P., & Rossi, J. P. (2006). Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002
dc.relation.referencesLavelle, P., Rodríguez, N., Arguello, O., Bernal, J., Botero, C., Chaparro, P., Gómez, Y., Gutiérrez, A., Hurtado, M. del P., Loaiza, S., Pullido, S. X., Rodríguez, E., Sanabria, C., Velásquez, E., & Fonte, S. J. (2014). Soil ecosystem services and land use in the rapidly changing Orinoco River Basin of Colombia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 185, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.020
dc.relation.referencesLegendre, P., & Gallagher, E. D. (2001). Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 129(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/S004420100716/METRICS
dc.relation.referencesLeibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J. M., Hoopes, M. F., Holt, R. D., Shurin, J. B., Law, R., Tilman, D., Loreau, M., & Gonzalez, A. (2004). The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. In Ecology Letters (Vol. 7, Issue 7, pp. 601–613). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x
dc.relation.referencesLima, A. S., Maciel, R., Togni, P. H. B., & Frizzas, M. R. (2024). The functional guilds of dung beetles mediate secondary seed dispersal in a tropical savanna. Applied Soil Ecology, 204, 105736. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSOIL.2024.105736
dc.relation.referencesLindenmayer, D. B., Hunter, M. L., Burton, P. J., & Gibbons, P. (2009). Effects of logging on fire regimes in moist forests. Conservation Letters, 2(6), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00080.x
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Y., Liu, H., Zhou, Y., & Sun, C. (2018). Spread vector induced cellular automata model for real-time crown fire behavior simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 108, 14–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.005
dc.relation.referencesLobo, J. M., Lumaret, J. P., & Jay-Robert, P. (2002). Modelling the species richness distribution of French dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) and delimiting the predictive capacity of different groups of explanatory variables. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11(4), 265– 277. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1466-822X.2002.00291.X
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Bedoya, P. A., Bohada-Murillo, M., Ángel-Vallejo, M. C., Audino, L. D., Davis, A. L. V., Gurr, G., & Noriega, J. A. (2022). Primary forest loss and degradation reduces biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A global meta-analysis using dung beetles as an indicator taxon. Journal of Applied Ecology, 59(6), 1572–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2664.14167
dc.relation.referencesLosey, J. E., & Vaughan, M. (2006). The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects. BioScience, 56(4), 311. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006- 3568(2006)56[311:tevoes]2.0.
dc.relation.referencesLouzada, J., Lima, A. P., Matavelli, R., Zambaldi, L., & Barlow, J. (2010). Community structure of dung beetles in Amazonian savannas: role of fire disturbance, vegetation and landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 25(4), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9448-3
dc.relation.referencesLouzada, J. N. C., & Silva, P. R. C. E. (2009). Utilisation of introduced Brazilian pastures ecosystems by native dung beetles: Diversity patterns and resource use. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2008.00038.x
dc.relation.referencesLucas-Borja, M. E., Zhou, G., Zema, D. A., & Delgado-Baquerizo, M. (2024). Fostering biodiversity research in post-fire biology. Science of The Total Environment, 926, 171985. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2024.171985
dc.relation.referencesMacagno, A. L. M., Moczek, A. P., & Pizzo, A. (2016). Rapid Divergence of Nesting Depth and Digging Appendages among Tunneling Dung Beetle Populations and Species. The American Naturalist, 187(5), E143–E151. https://doi.org/10.1086/685776
dc.relation.referencesMacedo, R., Audino, L. D., Korasaki, V., & Louzada, J. (2020). Conversion of Cerrado savannas into exotic pastures: The relative importance of vegetation and food resources for dung beetle assemblages. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106709
dc.relation.referencesMaldonado, M. B., Aranibar, J. N., Serrano, A. M., Chacoff, N. P., & Vázquez, D. P. (2019). Dung beetles and nutrient cycling in a dryland environment. Catena, 179, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.03.035
dc.relation.referencesMamantov, M. A., & Sheldon, K. S. (2021). Behavioural responses to warming differentially impact survival in introduced and native dung beetles. Journal of Animal Ecology, 90(1), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13366
dc.relation.referencesManning, P., Slade, E. M., Beynon, S. A., & Lewis, O. T. (2016). Functionally rich dung beetle assemblages are required to provide multiple ecosystem services. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 218, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.007
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Falcón, A. P., Zurita, G. A., Ortega-Martínez, I. J., & Moreno, C. E. (2018). Populations and assemblages living on the edge: Dung beetle responses to forests-pasture ecotones. PeerJ, 2018(12), e6148. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.6148/SUPP-4
dc.relation.referencesMatthews, E. G., & Halffter, G. (1966). The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:86044958
dc.relation.referencesMay, R. M. (1973). Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. In Monographs in population biology (Vol. 6). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3743
dc.relation.referencesMbora, D. N. M., & Mutua, M. N. (2023). The joint effects of forest habitat area and fragmentation on dung beetles. Ecology and Evolution, 13(8), e10429. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECE3.10429
dc.relation.referencesMcGill, B. J., Enquist, B. J., Weiher, E., & Westoby, M. (2006). Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(4), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002
dc.relation.referencesMcLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., Balch, J. K., Baker, P., Batllori, E., Bigio, E., Brando, P., Cattau, M., Chipman, M. L., Coen, J., Crandall, R., … Watts, A. C. (2020). Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers. In Journal of Ecology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2745.13403
dc.relation.referencesMéndez, J. (2012). Escarabajos coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) asociados a excrementos de mamíferos en un fragmento de bosque seco tropical en el Departamento del Atlántico, Colombia. Ecología Austral, 22, 203–210.
dc.relation.referencesMenéndez, R., & Gutiérrez, D. (2004). Shifts in habitat associations of dung beetles in northern Spain: Climate change implications1. Écoscience, 11(3), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2004.11682840
dc.relation.referencesMenéndez, R., Monteith, G. B., van Oosterzee, P., & Preece, N. D. (2024). Identifying the best method for restoring dung beetle biodiversity and function in the early stages of rainforest restoration. Restoration Ecology, 32(4), e14104. https://doi.org/10.1111/REC.14104
dc.relation.referencesMenéndez, R., Webb, P., & Orwin, K. H. (2016). Complementarity of dung beetle species with different functional behaviours influence dung–soil carbon cycling. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 92, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2015.10.004
dc.relation.referencesMenta, C. (2012). Soil Fauna Diversity - Function, Soil Degradation, Biological Indices, Soil Restoration. In G. A. Lameed (Ed.), Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in a Diverse World. InTech.
dc.relation.referencesMichael, B., C.R., T., & Harper, J. L. (2006). Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems. In Blackwell Publishing (Vol. 51, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01592.x
dc.relation.referencesMilotić, T., Baltzinger, C., Eichberg, C., Eycott, A. E., Heurich, M., Müller, J., Noriega, J. A., Menendez, R., Stadler, J., Ádám, R., Bargmann, T., Bilger, I., Calatayud, J., Ciubuc, C., Boros, G., Hauso, M., Jay-Robert, P., Kruus, M., Merivee, E., … Hoffmann, M. (2018). Dung beetle assemblages,dung removal and secondary seed dispersal: data from a large- scale, multi-site experiment in the Western Palaearctic. Frontiers of Biogeography, 10 (1-2).
dc.relation.referencesMiyanishi, K. (2001). Duff Consumption. In Forests Fires: Behavior and ecological effects (Johnson, E, p. 594). Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesMontes De Oca, E., & Halffter, G. (1998). Invasion of Mexico by two dung beetles previously introduced into the United States. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 33(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1076/SNFE.33.1.37.2174
dc.relation.referencesMontes-Rodríguez, J. M., Molina, O. E. O., & Vélez, Y. E. (2019). Efecto de borde en ensamblajes de escarabajos coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en fragmentos de bosque de un paisaje andino. Caldasia, 41(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v41n2.70845
dc.relation.referencesMorales-Alba, A. F., & Carvajal-Cogollo, J. E. (2023). Quantifying the distribution and morphological variation of the beetles Homocopris achamas and Uroxys coarctatus in Andean ecosystems of Colombia. Austral Ecology, 48(8), 1961–1977. https://doi.org/10.1111/AEC.13433
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, C. E., Verdú, J. R., & Arita, H. T. (2007). Elementos ecológicos e históricos como determinantes de la diversidad de especies en comunidades. In Escarabajos, diversidad y conservación biológica (pp. 179–192).
dc.relation.referencesMoretti, M., Dias, A. T. C., de Bello, F., Altermatt, F., Chown, S. L., Azcárate, F. M., Bell, J. R., Fournier, B., Hedde, M., Hortal, J., Ibanez, S., Öckinger, E., Sousa, J. P., Ellers, J., & Berg, M. P. (2017). Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits. Functional Ecology, 31(3), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12776
dc.relation.referencesMurcia, C. (1995). Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. In Trends in Ecology & Evolution (Vol. 10, Issue 2, pp. 58–62). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169- 5347(00)88977-6
dc.relation.referencesMyers, R. L. (2006). Living with Fire— Sustaining Ecosystems and Livelihoods Through Integrated Fire Management Global Fire Initiative June 2006.
dc.relation.referencesNeita, J. C., & Escobar, F. (2012). The potential value of agroforestry to dung beetle diversity in the wet tropical forests of the Pacific lowlands of Colombia. Agroforestry Systems, 85(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9445-9
dc.relation.referencesNepstad, D. C., Moreira, A. G., & Alencar, A. A. (1999). Flames in the Rain Forest: Origins, Impacts and Alternatives to Amazonian Fires. 186.
dc.relation.referencesNervo, B., Roggero, A., Isaia, M., Chamberlain, D., Rolando, A., & Palestrini, C. (2021). Integrating thermal tolerance, water balance and morphology: An experimental study on dung beetles. Journal of Thermal Biology, 101, 103093. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTHERBIO.2021.103093
dc.relation.referencesNervo, B., Tocco, C., Caprio, E., Palestrini, C., & Rolando, A. (2014). The effects of body mass on dung removal efficiency in dung beetles. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e107699. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107699
dc.relation.referencesNew, T. R. (2014). Insects, fire and conservation. Insects, Fire and Conservation, 9783319080, 1–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08096-3
dc.relation.referencesNichols, E., Gardner, T. A., Peres, C. A., Spector, S., & Network, T. S. R. (2009a). Co-declining mammals and dung beetles: an impending ecological cascade. Oikos, 118(4), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17268.x
dc.relation.referencesNichols, E., Larsen, T., Spector, S., Davis, A. L., Escobar, F., Favila, M., & Vulinec, K. (2007). Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: A quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 137(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023
dc.relation.referencesNichols, E., Spector, S., Louzada, J., Larsen, T., Amezquita, S., & Favila, M. E. (2008). Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation, 141(6), 1461–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, U. N., Wall, D. H., & Six, J. (2015). Soil Biodiversity and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- environ-102014-021257
dc.relation.referencesNiero, M. M., Loss, A., Brunetto, G., & Hernández, M. I. M. (2025). Efficiency of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in improving soil and forage grasses by incorporating nutrients through the removal of cattle dung. Austral Entomology, 64(1), e12724. https://doi.org/10.1111/AEN.12724
dc.relation.referencesNoriega, J. (2012). Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) Attracted to Lagothrix lagotricha (Humboldt) and Alouatta seniculus (Linnaeus) (Primates: Atelidae) Dung in a Colombian Amazon Forest. Psyche, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/437589
dc.relation.referencesNoriega, J. A., Floate, K. D., Génier, F., Reid, C. A. M., Kohlmann, B., Horgan, F. G., Davis, A. L. V., Forgie, S. A., Aguilar, C., Ibarra, M. G., Vaz-de-Mello, F., Ziani, S., & Lobo, J. M. (2020). Global distribution patterns provide evidence of niche shift by the introduced African dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 168(10), 766–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/EEA.12961
dc.relation.referencesNoriega, J. A., March-Salas, M., Castillo, S., García-Q, H., Hortal, J., & Santos, A. M. C. (2021). Human perturbations reduce dung beetle diversity and dung removal ecosystem function. Biotropica, 53(3), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/BTP.12953
dc.relation.referencesNoriega, J. A., Santos, A. M. C., Calatayud, J., Chozas, S., & Hortal, J. (2021). Short- and long- term temporal changes in the assemblage structure of Amazonian dung beetles. Oecologia, 195(3), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00442-020-04831-5/METRICS
dc.relation.referencesNoriega, J., Moreno, J., & Otavo, S. (2011). Quince años del arribo del escarabajo coprófago Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) a Colombia: Proceso de invasión y posibles efectos de su establecimiento. Biota Colombiana, 12, 35– 44.
dc.relation.referencesNunes, C. A., Beiroz, W., da Silva, P. G., Braga, R. F., Fernandes, G. W., & Neves, F. D. S. (2019). Fire? They don’t give a dung! The resilience of dung beetles to fire in a tropical savanna. Ecological Entomology, 44(3), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12705
dc.relation.referencesNyaga, D., & Mbora, M. (2022). Dung Beetle abundance, and species diversity, are maintained by primates in tropical forest fragments. https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-1422996/V1
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, U., Soares-Filho, B., Bustamante, M., Gomes, L., Ometto, J. P., & Rajão, R. (2022). Determinants of Fire Impact in the Brazilian Biomes. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 5, 735017. https://doi.org/10.3389/FFGC.2022.735017/BIBTEX
dc.relation.referencesOliveras, I., & Malhi, Y. (2016). Many shades of green: The dynamic tropical forest–savannah transition zones. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (Vol. 371, Issue 1703, p. 20150308). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0308
dc.relation.referencesOrtega-Martínez, I. J., Moreno, C. E., Escobar, F., Ortega-Martínez, I. J., Moreno, C. E., Escobar, F., Ortega-Martínez, I. J., Moreno, C. E., & Escobar, F. (2016). A dirty job: manure removal by dung beetles in both a cattle ranch and laboratory setting. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 161(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12488
dc.relation.referencesPalmeirim, A. F., Santos-Filho, M., & Peres, C. A. (2020). Marked decline in forest-dependent small mammals following habitat loss and fragmentation in an Amazonian deforestation frontier. PLOS ONE, 15(3), e0230209. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0230209
dc.relation.referencesPalusci, E., Mantoni, C., Strona, G., & Fattorini, S. (2021). Wildfire does not affect the dung beetle diversity of high-altitude Mediterranean habitats. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 30(8), 636–642. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20120
dc.relation.referencesParkins, K., York, A., & Di Stefano, J. (2018). Edge effects in fire-prone landscapes: Ecological importance and implications for fauna. Ecology and Evolution, 8(11), 5937–5948. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4076
dc.relation.referencesPastro, L. A., Dickman, C. R., & Letnic, M. (2014). Fire type and hemisphere determine the effects of fire on the alpha and beta diversity of vertebrates: A global meta-analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23(10), 1146–1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12195
dc.relation.referencesPausas, J. (2018). Generalized fire response strategies in plants and animals. Oikos, 00(1–7). https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05907
dc.relation.referencesPausas, J. G., Belliure, J., Mínguez, E., & Montagud, S. (2018). Fire benefits flower beetles in a Mediterranean ecosystem. PLoS ONE, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198951
dc.relation.referencesPausas, J. G., & Parr, C. L. (2018). Towards an understanding of the evolutionary role of fire in animals. Evolutionary Ecology, 32(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-018-9927-6
dc.relation.referencesPeters, D. P. C., Gosz, J. R., Pockman, W. T., Small, E. E., Parmenter, R. R., Collins, S. L., & Muldavin, E. (2006). Integrating patch and boundary dynamics to understand and predict biotic transitions at multiple scales. In Landscape Ecology (Vol. 21, Issue 1, pp. 19–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-1063-3
dc.relation.referencesPeyras, M., Vespa, N. I., Bellocq, M. I., & Zurita, G. A. (2013). Quantifying edge effects: The role of habitat contrast and species specialization. Journal of Insect Conservation, 17(4), 807– 820. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10841-013-9563-Y/METRICS
dc.relation.referencesPiccini, I., Nervo, B., Forshage, M., Celi, L., Palestrini, C., Rolando, A., & Roslin, T. (2018). Dung beetles as drivers of ecosystem multifunctionality: Are response and effect traits interwoven? Science of the Total Environment, 616–617, 1440–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.171
dc.relation.referencesPickett, S. T. A., & White, P. S. (1985). The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-02952-3
dc.relation.referencesPivello, V. R., Oliveras, I., Miranda, H. S., Haridasan, M., Sato, M. N., & Meirelles, S. T. (2010). Effect of fires on soil nutrient availability in an open savanna in Central Brazil. Plant and Soil, 337(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0508-x
dc.relation.referencesPortela Salomão, R., González-Tokman, D., Dáttilo, W., López-Acosta, J. C., & Favila, M. E. (2018). Landscape structure and composition define the body condition of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in a fragmented tropical rainforest. Ecological Indicators, 88, 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.033
dc.relation.referencesPyne, S. J., Andrews, P. L., & Laven, R. D. (1996). Introduction to wildland fire. Introduction to Wildland Fire., Ed. 2.
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, I., & Roslin, T. (2005). Rapid recovery of Ddng beetle communities following habitat fragmentation in Central Amazonia. Ecology, 86(12), 3303–3311. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3450739
dc.relation.referencesRaine, E. H., & Slade, E. M. (2019). Dung beetle–mammal associations: methods, research trends and future directions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286(1897). https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPB.2018.2002
dc.relation.referencesRalph, N. (2001). Water Relations of Forest Fuels. In Forests Fires: Behavior and ecological effects (Johnson, E, p. 594). Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesRangel-Acosta, J. L., Blanco-Rodríguez, O. R., Gutiérrez-Rapalino, B. P., & Martínez- Hernández, N. J. (2012). Coleópteros coprófagos asociados a excrementos de mamíferos en la Reserva Natural Luriza (RNL), Departamento del Atlántico, Colombia. Boletín de La Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 50, 409–419
dc.relation.referencesRangel-Acosta, J. L., Martínez-Hernández, N. J., & Yonoff-Zapata, R. (2020). Response of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) to habitat modification caused by a forest fire in the Bijibana Reserve, Atlántico-Colombia. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 91. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2020.91.2879
dc.relation.referencesRies, L., Fletcher, R. J., Battin, J., & Sisk, T. D. (2004). Ecological responses to habitat edges: Mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35(1), 491–522. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130148
dc.relation.referencesRipple, W. J., Whalen, D. N., Wolf, C., Cao, Y., Schulte, J., Swann, S., Woodrich, S. T., Newsome, T., Cairncross, R., & Wirsing, A. J. (2024). Trophic cascades and climate change. Food Webs, 41, e00362. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOOWEB.2024.E00362
dc.relation.referencesRivera, J. D., de los Monteros, A. E., Saldaña-Vázquez, R. A., & Favila, M. E. (2023). Beyond species loss: How anthropogenic disturbances drive functional and phylogenetic homogenization of Neotropical dung beetles. Science of The Total Environment, 869, 161663. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2023.161663
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, S. I., McLaughlin, Ó. B., Marteinsdóttir, B., & O’Gorman, E. J. (2018). Soil temperature effects on the structure and diversity of plant and invertebrate communities in a natural warming experiment. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87(3), 634–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12798
dc.relation.referencesRoces-Díaz, J. V., Santín, C., Martínez-Vilalta, J., & Doerr, S. H. (2022). A global synthesis of fire effects on ecosystem services of forests and woodlands. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 20(3), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/FEE.2349
dc.relation.referencesRohner, P. T., Jones, J. A., & Moczek, A. P. (2024). Plasticity, symbionts and niche construction interact in shaping dung beetle development and evolution. Journal of Experimental Biology, 227(Suppl_1). https://doi.org/10.1242/JEB.245976/344073
dc.relation.referencesRomero-Ruiz, M. H., Flantua, S. G. A., Tansey, K., & Berrio, J. C. (2012). Landscape transformations in savannas of northern South America: Land use/cover changes since 1987 in the Llanos Orientales of Colombia. Applied Geography, 32(2), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.010
dc.relation.referencesRosan, T. M., Sitch, S., Mercado, L. M., Heinrich, V., Friedlingstein, P., & Aragão, L. E. O. C. (2022). Fragmentation-driven divergent trends in burned area in Amazonia and Cerrado. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 5, 801408. https://doi.org/10.3389/FFGC.2022.801408/BIBTEX
dc.relation.referencesRoslin, T., & Koivunen, A. (2001). Distribution and abundance of dung beetles in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia, 127(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000565
dc.relation.referencesRyan, K. (2002). Dynamic interactions between forest structure and fire behavior in boreal ecosystems. Silva Fennica, 36(1), 13–39.
dc.relation.referencesRyu, S. R., & Nakamura, F. (2014). Ecological impacts of fire and postfire restoration in Korea. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 10(1), 201–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355- 013-0232-9
dc.relation.referencesSaifutdinov, R. A., Gongalsky, K. B., & Zaitsev, A. S. (2018). Evidence of a trait-specific response to burning in springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) in the boreal forests of European Russia. Geoderma, 332, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.021
dc.relation.referencesSalomão, R. P., Correa, C. M. de A., Santorelli Junior, S., Lima, A. P., Magnusson, W. E., Arruda, E. F., de Oliveira, A. P. V., & Cabral, R. C. C. (2023). Species diet and the effect of different spatial bait distribution on assemblage of dung beetles in Amazonian white-sand forest. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 43(3), 1153–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42690-023-01012-8/FIGURES/3
dc.relation.referencesSalomão, R. P., Favila, M. E., & González-Tokman, D. (2020). Spatial and temporal changes in the dung beetle diversity of a protected, but fragmented, landscape of the northernmost Neotropical rainforest. Ecological Indicators, 111, 105968. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2019.105968
dc.relation.referencesSauvadet, M., Chauvat, M., Cluzeau, D., Maron, P.-A., Villenave, C., & Bertrand, I. (2016). The dynamics of soil micro-food web structure and functions vary according to litter quality. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 95, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.003
dc.relation.referencesScheffler, P. (2005). Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) diversity and community structure across three disturbance regimes in eastern Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21, 9– 19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467404001683
dc.relation.referencesSchmitz, A., & Schmitz, H. (2021). Sensory equipment and adaptations to the fire habitat of the antennae of the Australian ´firebeetle´ Merimna atrata (Coleoptera; Buprestidae). Zoomorphology, 140(4), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-021-00543-3
dc.relation.referencesScott, J. H., & Reinhardt, E. D. (2001). Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
dc.relation.referencesSilva, P. G. da, & Hernández, M. I. M. (2015). Spatial Patterns of Movement of Dung Beetle Species in a Tropical Forest Suggest a New Trap Spacing for Dung Beetle Biodiversity Studies. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0126112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126112
dc.relation.referencesSilva, S. S. da, Fearnside, P. M., Graça, P. M. L. de A., Brown, I. F., Alencar, A., & Melo, A. W. F. de. (2018). Dynamics of forest fires in the southwestern Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management, 424, 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.041
dc.relation.referencesSilva, M. C., Teodoro, G. S., Bragion, E. F. A., & van den Berg, E. (2019). The role of intraspecific trait variation in the occupation of sharp forest-savanna ecotones. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 253, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.03.003
dc.relation.referencesSilveira, J. M., Louzada, J., Barlow, J., Andrade, R., Mestre, L., Solar, R., Lacau, S., & Cochrane, M. A. (2016). A Multi-Taxa Assessment of Biodiversity Change After Single and Recurrent Wildfires in a Brazilian Amazon Forest. Biotropica, 48(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12267
dc.relation.referencesSlade, E. M., Kirwan, L., Bell, T., Philipson, C. D., Lewis, O. T., & Roslin, T. (2017). The importance of species identity and interactions for multifunctionality depends on how ecosystem functions are valued. Ecology, 98(10), 2626–2639. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECY.1954
dc.relation.referencesSlade, E. M., Mann, D. J., Villanueva, J. F., & Lewis, O. T. (2007). Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 76(6), 1094–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01296.x
dc.relation.referencesSlade, E. M., Roslin, T., Santalahti, M., & Bell, T. (2016). Disentangling the ‘brown world’ faecal- detritus interaction web: dung beetle effects on soil microbial properties. Oikos, 125(5), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02640
dc.relation.referencesSladecek, F. X. J., Dötterl, S., Schäffler, I., Segar, S. T., & Konvicka, M. (2021). Succession of Dung-Inhabiting Beetles and Flies Reflects the Succession of Dung-Emitted Volatile Compounds. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 47(4–5), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10886-021-01266-X
dc.relation.referencesSladecek, F. X. J., Hrcek, J., Klimes, P., & Konvicka, M. (2013). Interplay of succession and seasonality reflects resource utilization in an ephemeral habitat. Acta Oecologica, 46, 17– 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAO.2012.10.012
dc.relation.referencesSmolka, J., Baird, E., Byrne, M. J., El Jundi, B., Warrant, E. J., & Dacke, M. (2012). Dung beetles use their dung ball as a mobile thermal refuge. Current Biology, 22(20), R863– R864. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2012.08.057
dc.relation.referencesSpector, S., & Ayzama, S. (2003). Rapid turnover and edge effects in dung beetle assemblages (Scarabaeidae) at a Bolivian Neotropical forest-savanna ecotone. Biotropica, 35(3), 394– 404. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-7429.2003.TB00593.X
dc.relation.referencesStott, P. (2000). Combustion in tropical biomass fires: A critical review. In Progress in Physical Geography (Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 355–377). https://doi.org/10.1191/030913300701542679
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, A. L., Surawski, N. C., Crawford, D., Hurley, R. J., Volkova, L., Weston, C. J., & Meyer, C. P. (2018). Effect of woody debris on the rate of spread of surface fires in forest fuels in a combustion wind tunnel. Forest Ecology and Management, 424, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.039
dc.relation.referencesSwengel, A. (2001). A literature review of insect responses to fire, compared to other conservation managements of open habitat. Biodiversity and Conservation - BIODIVERS CONSERV, 10, 1141–1169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016683807033
dc.relation.referencesThomas, J. A., White, J. D., & Murray, D. B. (2016). Tree species influence woodland canopy characteristics and crown fire potential. Forest Ecology and Management, 362, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.004
dc.relation.referencesThompson, H. M., Lesser, M. R., Myers, L., & Mihuc, T. B. (2022). Insect Community Response Following Wildfire in an Eastern North American Pine Barrens. In Forests (Vol. 13, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010066
dc.relation.referencesTixier, T., Lumaret, J.-P., & Sullivan, G. T. (2015). Contribution of the timing of the successive waves of insect colonisation to dung removal in a grazed agro-ecosystem. European Journal of Soil Biology, 69, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.06.001
dc.relation.referencesTomlinson, K. W., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Borghetti, F., Ward, D., de Bie, S., & van Langevelde, F. (2013). Leaf adaptations of evergreen and deciduous trees of semi-arid and humid savannas on three continents. Journal of Ecology, 101(2), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12056
dc.relation.referencesTorello-Raventos, M., Feldpausch, T. R., Veenendaal, E., Schrodt, F., Saiz, G., Domingues, T. F., Djagbletey, G., Ford, A., Kemp, J., Marimon, B. S., Hur Marimon Junior, B., Lenza, E., Ratter, J. A., Maracahipes, L., Sasaki, D., Sonké, B., Zapfack, L., Taedoumg, H., Villarroel, D., … Lloyd, J. (2013). On the delineation of tropical vegetation types with an emphasis on forest/savanna transitions. Plant Ecology and Diversity, 6(1), 101–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2012.762812
dc.relation.referencesTowsend, C. R., & Hildrew, A. G. (1994). Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biology, 31(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2427.1994.tb01740.x
dc.relation.referencesTregidgo, D. J., Qie, L., Barlow, J., Sodhi, N. S., & Lim, S. L.-H. (2010). Vertical stratification responses of an arboreal dung beetle species to Tropical Forest fragmentation in Malaysia: Arboreal dung beetles in fragments. Biotropica, 42(5), 521–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00649.x
dc.relation.referencesTurner, M. G., Romme, W. H., Gardner, R. H., & Hargrove, W. W. (1997). Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Monographs, 67(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0411:EOFSAP]
dc.relation.referencesValente, F., & Laurini, M. (2023). A spatio-temporal analysis of fire occurrence patterns in the Brazilian Amazon. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023- 39875-z
dc.relation.referencesVasconcelos, H. L., Pacheco, R., Silva, R. C., Vasconcelos, P. B., Lopes, C. T., Costa, A. N., & Bruna, E. M. (2009). Dynamics of the Leaf-Litter Arthropod Fauna Following Fire in a Neotropical Woodland Savanna. PLoS ONE, 4(11), e7762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007762
dc.relation.referencesVaz-de-Mello, F., & Louzada, J. N. C. (1997). Considerações sobre forrageio arbóreo por Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea), e dados sobre sua ocorrência em floresta tropical do Brasil. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 72, 55–61.
dc.relation.referencesVaz-de-Mello, F. Z. (2007). Revision and phylogeny of the dung beetle genus Zonocopris Arrow 1932 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), a phoretic of land snails. Annales de La Societe Entomologique de France, 43(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2007.10697516
dc.relation.referencesVeneklaas, E. J., Fajardo, A., Obregon, S., & Lozano, J. (2005). Gallery forest types and their environmental correlates in a Colombian savanna landscape. Ecography, 28(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03934.x
dc.relation.referencesVerdú, J., Arellano, L., Numa, C., & Micó, E. (2007). Roles of endothermy in niche differentiation for ball-rolling dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) along an altitudinal gradient. Ecological Entomology, 32, 544–551.
dc.relation.referencesVerdú, J. R., Arellano, L., & Numa, C. (2006). Thermoregulation in endothermic dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): Effect of body size and ecophysiological constraints in flight. Journal of Insect Physiology, 52(8), 854–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.05.005
dc.relation.referencesVerdú, J. R., Arellano, L., Numa, C., & Micó, E. (2007). Roles of endothermy in niche differentiation for ball-rolling dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) along an altitudinal gradient. Ecological Entomology, 32(5), 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2311.2007.00907.x
dc.relation.referencesVerdú, J. R., Cortez, V., Oliva, D., & Giménez-Gómez, V. (2019). Thermoregulatory syndromes of two sympatric dung beetles with low energy costs. Journal of Insect Physiology, 118, 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2019.103945
dc.relation.referencesVerdú, J. R., Oliva, D., Giménez Gómez, V. C., & Cortez, V. (2022). Differential ecophysiological syndromes explain the partition of the thermal niche resource in coexisting Eucraniini dung beetles. Ecological Entomology, 47(4), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/EEN.13153
dc.relation.referencesVieira, L., Louzada, J. N. C., & Spector, S. (2008). Effects of degradation and replacement of Southern Brazilian Coastal sandy vegetation on the dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Biotropica, 40(6), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744- 7429.2008.00432.X
dc.relation.referencesVillada-Bedoya, S., Cultid-Medina, C. A., Escobar, F., Guevara, R., & Zurita, G. (2017). Edge effects on dung beetle assemblages in an Andean mosaic of forest and coffee plantations. Biotropica, 49(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/BTP.12373
dc.relation.referencesVulinec, K. (2000). Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), monkeys, and conservation in Amazonia. The Florida Entomologist, 83(3), 229. https://doi.org/10.2307/3496341
dc.relation.referencesVulinec, K., Mellow, D. J., & da Fonseca, C. R. V. (2007). Arboreal foraging height in a common Neotropical dung beetle, Canthon subhyalinus Harold (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 61(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1649/915.1
dc.relation.referencesWard, D. (2001). Combustion Chemistry and Smoke. In Forest Fires (pp. 55–77). Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesWardle, D. A., & Nicholson, K. S. (1996). Synergistic Effects of Grassland Plant Species on Soil Microbial Biomass and Activity: Implications for Ecosystem-Level Effects of Enriched Plant Diversity. Functional Ecology, 10(3), 410. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390291
dc.relation.referencesWong, M. K. L., Guénard, B., & Lewis, O. T. (2018). Trait-based ecology of terrestrial arthropods. Biological Reviews, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12488
dc.relation.referencesYodzis, P. (1986). Competition, Mortality and Community Structure. In J. M. Diamond & T. J. Case (Eds.), Community Ecology (pp. 480–491). Harper and Row.
dc.relation.referencesZaitsev, A. S., Gongalsky, K. B., Malmström, A., Persson, T., & Bengtsson, J. (2016). Why are forest fires generally neglected in soil fauna research? A mini-review. Applied Soil Ecology, 98, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.012
dc.relation.referencesZaitsev, A. S., Gongalsky, K. B., Persson, T., & Bengtsson, J. (2014). Connectivity of litter islands remaining after a fire and unburnt forest determines the recovery of soil fauna. Applied Soil Ecology, 83, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.01.007
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc570 - Biología
dc.subject.ddc570 - Biología::577 - Ecología
dc.subject.lembINCENDIOS FORESTALESspa
dc.subject.lembForest fireseng
dc.subject.lembDESASTRES NATURALESspa
dc.subject.lembNatural disasterseng
dc.subject.lembESCARABAJOS-IDENTIFICACIONspa
dc.subject.lembBeetles - identificationeng
dc.subject.lembBOSQUES TROPICALESspa
dc.subject.lembTropical forestseng
dc.subject.lembECOLOGIA DE SABANASspa
dc.subject.lembSavanna ecologyeng
dc.subject.proposalBioindicadoresspa
dc.subject.proposalOcurrencia de incendiosspa
dc.subject.proposalOrinoquíaspa
dc.subject.proposalRecuperación post-fuegospa
dc.subject.proposalScarabaeinaespa
dc.subject.proposalServicios ecosistémicosspa
dc.subject.proposalBioindicatorseng
dc.subject.proposalFire occurrenceeng
dc.subject.proposalPost-fire recoveryeng
dc.subject.proposalScarabaeinaeeng
dc.subject.proposalEcosystem serviceseng
dc.titleEfecto de los incendios forestales sobre los ensamblajes de escarabajos coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) en la transición bosque de galería-sabana, Vichada, Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedEffect of forest fires on dung beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in the gallery forest–savanna ecotone, Vichada, Colombiaeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
oaire.fundernameMinisterio de Ciencia y Tecnología

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tesis CJMF 2025 FINAL Diciembre Final.pdf
Tamaño:
6.33 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Docotrado en Ciencias - Biología
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Doctorado en Ciencias - Biología