NNLO Vacuum Stability Analysis in the SM and the Higgs Bosons of the MSSM at Three-Loop Accuracy

dc.contributor.advisorFazio, Angelo Raffaelespa
dc.contributor.authorReyes Rojas, Edilson Alfonsospa
dc.contributor.corporatenameUNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIAspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Campos y Particulasspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-11T04:02:48Zspa
dc.date.available2020-08-11T04:02:48Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-08-06spa
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis we provide a fixed-order Feynman diagrammatic computation of the quantum corrections to the lightest CP-even Higgs Boson mass in the real version of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. We have computed the contributions coming from the SUSY-QCD sector with a precision of three-loops at order O(α_t α_s^2 ). The adopted regularization procedure is based on the dimensional reduction scheme in order to preserve supersymmetry to all perturbative orders. The calculation extends the region of validity of previous studies to the whole supersymmetric parameter space. The Higgs mass corrections are expressed in terms of a set of three-loop vacuum integrals which have been computed by exploiting dispersion relation techniques which allows their numerical evaluation for an arbitrary hierarchy of the involved mass scales. A numerical comparison of our results with the other predictions found in literature has been done. In particular, the code FeynHiggs combines one- and two-loop fixed-order with the effective-field-theory calculations and gives a reliable prediction for the same Higgs mass at three-loop level. The two numerical predictions agree considering the scenario of only one SUSY-scale and vanishing stop mixing parameter below 10 TeV. For large scales above 10 TeV we have observed sizeable numerical differences between the two predictions. The difference grows monotonically with the SUSY scale due to the effects of large logarithmic terms in the fixed-order computation which spoil the perturbativity of the corrections. Therefore, we have developed an additional numerical analysis where we look for constraints on the supersymmetric scale. The combined CMS/ATLAS Higgs mass value and the vacuum stability problem of the SM are used to derive an upper bound on the needed SUSY scale. In the considered scenario, for a large size of the ratio between the vacuum expectation values of the two CP-even Higgs boson fields (tanβ ≥ 10), values above the SUSY scale 12.5 ± 1.2 TeV are excluded. For small values of tanβ ≈ 1, a higher upper bound of about 10^11 GeV was found.spa
dc.description.abstractEn esta tesis proporcionamos un cálculo diagramático a orden fijo de las correcciones cuánticas a la masa del boson de Higgs liviano en el modelo super-simétrico minimal con parámetros reales. Hemos calculado las contribuciones provenientes del sector de la QCD super-simétrica con una precisión de tres-loops al orden O(α_t α_s^2 ). El procedimiento de regularización adoptado esta basado en el esquema de reducción dimensional con el fin de preservar la super-simetría en todos los ordenes perturbativos. El cálculo extiende la región de validez de estudios previos al espacio completo de parámetros super-simétricos. Las correcciones a la masa del Higgs son expresadas en términos de un conjunto de integrales del vacío a tres-loops las cuales han sido calculadas explotando las técnicas del método de dispersión que permite realizar su evaluación numérica para una jerarquía arbitraria de las escalas de masa involucradas. Por otro lado, hemos realizado una comparación numérica de nuestros resultados con las demás predicciones teóricas encontradas en la literatura. En particular, el código FeynHiggs combina cálculos a orden fijo con los cálculos provenientes de la teoría efectiva de campos cuánticos dando una predicción confiable para la masa del boson de Higgs hasta el orden de tres-loops. Las dos predicciones numéricas son compatibles en el escenario donde solo hay una escala de la super-simetrı́a que toma valores menores a 10 TeV y donde el parámetro de mezcla del quark stop se anula. Para escalas mayores a 10 TeV observamos diferencias numéricas significativas. La diferencia crece sin acotarse al aumentar la escala de la super-simetría debido a los efectos de los términos con logaritmos grandes en el cálculo a orden fijo que dañan la perturbatividad de las correcciones cuánticas. Por lo tanto, hemos realizado un análisis numérico adicional donde buscamos restricciones al valor que puede tomar la escala super-simétrica. El valor experimental combinado para la masa del boson de Higgs obtenido por los laboratorios CMS y ATLAS y el problema de la estabilidad del vacío en el modelo estándar son usados para derivar cotas superiores sobre esta escala. En el escenario considerado en este trabajo, para un valor grande de la razón entre los valores esperados en el vacío de los dos campos de Higgs pares bajo CP (tanβ ≥ 10), hemos encontrado que valores de la escala super-simétrica superiores a 12.5 ± 1.2 TeV están excluidos. Para valores pequeños de tanβ ≈ 1, una cota superior muy grande de alrededor de 10^11 GeV fue encontrada.spa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.format.extent158spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77990
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Físicaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias - Doctorado en Ciencias - Físicaspa
dc.relation.referencesE. A. Reyes R., A. R. Fazio, EPJ Web Conf. 192, 00033 (2018).spa
dc.relation.referencesA. R. Fazio and E. A. Reyes R., Nucl. Phys. B 942, 164-183 (2019). [arXiv:1901.03651 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesE.A. Reyes R., A.R. Fazio, Phys. Rev. D 100, no.11, 115017 (2019). [arXiv:1908.00693 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 - 29 (2012). [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]].spa
dc.relation.referencesCMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 - 61 (2012). [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]].spa
dc.relation.referencesATLAS, CMS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 191803 (2015). [arXiv:1503.07589 [hep-ex]].spa
dc.relation.referencesCMS Collaboration, JHEP 1711, 047 (2017). [arXiv:1706.09936 [hep-ex]].spa
dc.relation.referencesATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 784, 345-366 (2018). [arXiv:1806.00242 [hep-ex]].spa
dc.relation.referencesL. D. Landau, A. A. Abrikosov, and I. M. Khalatnikov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 95, 497, 773, 1177 (1954).spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miró, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Strumia, JHEP 1208, 098 (2012). [arXiv:1205.6497 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Bezrukov, M. Yu. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl, M. Shaposhnikov, JHEP 1210, 140 (2012). [arXiv:1205.2893 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesD. Buttazzo, G. Degrassi, P. P. Giardino, G. Giudice, F. Sala, A. Salvio and A. Strumia, JHEP 1312, 089 (2013). [arXiv:1307.3536 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesB. A. Kniehl and O. L. Veretin, Nucl. Phys. B 885, 459 (2014). [Erratum:Nucl. Phys. B 894, 56 (2015)]. [arXiv:1401.1844 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesB. A. Kniehl, A. F. Pikelner and O. L. Veretin, Nucl. Phys. B 896, 19 (2015). [arXiv:1503.02138 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. V. Bednyakov, B. A. Kniehl, A. F. Pikelner, O. L. Veretin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, no.20, 201802 (2015). [arXiv:1507.08833 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesK. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 3, 1818 (1971).spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Gildener and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 13, 3333 (1976).spa
dc.relation.referencesG. ’t Hooft, NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. B Phys. 59, 135 (1980).spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. D. Bjorken, S. Pakvasa, S. F. Tuan, Phys. Rev. D 66, 053008 (2002).spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Jegerlehner, M. Yu. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 608, no.1, 012074 (2015). [arXiv:1412.4215 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Nucl. Phys. B 757, 19 (2006). [hep-ph/0606105].spa
dc.relation.referencesT. Barklow, J. Brau, K. Fujii, J. Gao, J. List, N. Walker and K. Yokoya, [arXiv:1506.07830 [hep-ex]] (2015).spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Bicer, et al., JHEP 1401, 164 (2014). https://fcc.web.cern.ch. [arXiv:1308.6176 [hep-ex]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Fayet and S. Ferrara, Phys. Rep. 32, 249 (1977).spa
dc.relation.referencesH. P. Nilles, Phys. Rept. 110, 1 (1984).spa
dc.relation.referencesH. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, Phys. Rept. 117, 75–263 (1985).spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Drees, R. Godbole, and P. Roy, Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles, World Scientific, Singapore, (2005).spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Kuroda, [hep-ph/9902340] (2005).spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Terning, Modern Supersymmetry - Dinamics and Duality, CLARENDON PRESS - Oxford, (2006).spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Baer and X. Tata, Weak Scale Supersymmetry: from Superfields to Scattering Events, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (2006).spa
dc.relation.referencesI.J.R. Aitchison, Supersymmetry in Particle Physics: an elementary introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (2007).spa
dc.relation.referencesN. Sakai, Z. Phys. C 11, 153 (1981).spa
dc.relation.referencesR. K. Kaul, Phys. Lett. B 109, 19 (1982).spa
dc.relation.referencesR. K. Kaul and M. Parthasarathi, Nucl. Phys. B 199, 36 (1982).spa
dc.relation.referencesL. Susskind, Phys. Reports 104, 181 (1984).spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, G. Weiglein, Phys. Lett. B 710, 201-206 (2012). [arXiv:1112.3026 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Carena, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, C.E.M. Wagner, G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C73, no.9, 2552 (2013). [arXiv:1302.7033 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Bagnaschi, et al. Eur. Phys. J. C79, no.7, 617 (2019). [arXiv:1808.07542 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Bahl, S. Liebler, T. Stefaniak, Eur. Phys. J. C79, no.3, 279 (2019). [arXiv:1901.05933 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Athron, J.h. Park, T. Steudtner, D. Stöckinger, A. Voigt, JHEP 1701, 079 (2017). [arXiv:1609.00371 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesB.C. Allanach, A. Voigt, Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.7, 573 (2018). [arXiv:1804.09410 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesCERN Report No. CERN-LHCC-2006-021; http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/cpt/tdr/.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. A. Aguilar-Saavedra et al. [ECFA/DESY LC Physics Working Group]. [arXiv:0106315 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesW. Siegel, Phys. Lett. B 84, 193 (1979).spa
dc.relation.referencesD. M. Capper, D. R. T. Jones and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Nucl. Phys. B 167, 479 (1980).spa
dc.relation.referencesI. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, S. P. Martin, M. T. Vaughn and Y. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5481 (1994). [hep-ph/9407291].spa
dc.relation.referencesC. Gnendiger et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.7, 471 (2017). [arXiv:1705.01827 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. D. L. Kronig, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 12, 547-556 (1926).spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Bjorken and S. Drell, Relativistic quantum mechanics. International series in pure and applied physics. McGraw-Hill, 1964.spa
dc.relation.referencesZ. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower, Nucl.Phys. B 425, 217-260 (1994). [hep-ph/9403226].spa
dc.relation.referencesZ. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower, Nucl.Phys. B435, 59-101 (1995). [hep-ph/9409265].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Bauberger, F. A. Berends, M. Boehm, M. Buza, Nucl.Phys. B 434, 383-407 (1995). [hep-ph/9409388].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Bauberger, M. Boehm, Nucl.Phys. B 445, 25-48 (1995). [hep-ph/9501201].spa
dc.relation.referencesZ. Bern, L. J. Dixon and D. A. Kosower, Annals Phys. 322, 1587-1634 (2007). [arXiv:0704.2798 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. V. Harlander, J. Klappert, A. Voigt, Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.12, 814 (2017). [arXiv:1708.05720 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Bahl, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, S. Paßehr, H. Rzehak, G. Weiglein, (2018). [arXiv:1811.09073 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Haag, J. T. Lopuszanski and M. Sohnius, Nucl. Phys. B 88, 257 (1975).spa
dc.relation.referencesS. R. Coleman and J. Mandula, Phys. Rev. 159, 1251 (1967).spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Langacker, The Standard Model and Beyond, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, (2010).spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 188 513 (1981).spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Dimopoulos, H. Georgi, Nucl.Phys. B 193, 150 (1981).spa
dc.relation.referencesL. Girardello, M. T. Grisaru, Nucl.Phys. B 194, 65 (1982).spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Barbieri, M. Frigeni and F. Caravaglios, Phys. Lett. B 258, 167 - 170 (1991).spa
dc.relation.referencesC. Bollini, J. Giambiagi, Nuovo Cim. B 12, 20 (1972).spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Ashmore, Nuovo Cim. Lett. 4, 289 (1972).spa
dc.relation.referencesG. ’t Hooft, M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B 44, 189 (1972).spa
dc.relation.referencesR. V. Harlander, L. Mihaila, M. Steinhauser, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 383-390 (2009). [arXiv:0905.4807 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesD. Stöckinger, J. Unger, Nucl.Phys. B 935, 1-16 (2018). [arXiv:1804.05619 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesG. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 61, 455 (1973).spa
dc.relation.referencesW. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, D. W. Duke, T. Muta, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3998 (1978).spa
dc.relation.referencesA. J. Buras, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 199 (1980).spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Passarino, M. Veltman, Phys. Lett. C 237, 537 (1990).spa
dc.relation.referencesW. J. Marciano, A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 163 (1981).spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Sirlin, Phys. Lett. B 232, 123 (1989).spa
dc.relation.referencesS. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 65, 116003 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0111209].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Böhm, W. Hollik, H. Spiesberger, Fortschr. Phys. 34, 687 (1986).spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Denner, Fortschr. Phys. 41, 307 (1993).spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Freitas, D. Stöckinger, Phys. Rev. D 66, 095014 (2002). [hep-ph/0205281].spa
dc.relation.referencesD. R. T. Jones and L. Mezincescu, Phys. Lett. B 136, 242 (1984); Ibid. 138, 293 (1984).spa
dc.relation.referencesA. J. Parkes and P. C. West, Nucl. Phys. B 256, 340 (1985).spa
dc.relation.referencesThe ATLAS, CDF, CMS and D0 Collaborations, (2014). [arXiv:1403.4427 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Beneke, V. M. Braun, Nucl.Phys. B 426, 301-343 (1994). [hep-ph/9402364].spa
dc.relation.references’t Hooft G., Nuclear Physics B. 61, 455 (1973).spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Alekhin, A. Djouadi and S. Moch, Phys. Lett. B, 716, 214 (2012). [arXiv:1207.0980 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov and B. A. Kniehl, Phys. Lett. B 722, 123 (2013). [arXiv:1212.4319 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Tarrach, Nucl. Phys. B 183, 384 (1981).spa
dc.relation.referencesN. Gray, D. J. Broadhurst, W. Grafe and K. Schilcher, Z. Phys. C 48, 673 (1990).spa
dc.relation.referencesL. V. Avdeev and M. Y. Kalmykov, Nucl. Phys. B 502, 419 (1997). [hep-ph/9701308].spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Fleischer, F. Jegerlehner, O. V. Tarasov and O. L. Veretin, Nucl. Phys. B 539, 671 (1999). [Erratum:Nucl. Phys. B 571, 511 (2000)]. [hep-ph/9803493].spa
dc.relation.referencesK. Melnikov and T. V. Ritbergen, Phys. Lett. B 482, 99 (2000). [hep-ph/9912391].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Marquard, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, no. 14, 142002 (2015).spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Bohm, H. Spiesberger and W. Hollik, Fortsch. Phys. 34, 687 (1986).spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Hempfling and B. A. Kniehl, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1386 (1995). [hep-ph/9408313].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov and O. Veretin, Nucl. Phys. B 658, 49 (2003). [hep-ph/0212319].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Jegerlehner and M. Y. Kalmykov, Nucl. Phys. B 676, 365 (2004). [hep-ph/0308216].spa
dc.relation.referencesB. A. Kniehl, A. F. Pikelner, O. L. Veretin, Comput. Phys. Commun. 206, 84-96 (2016). [arXiv:1601.08143 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. P. Martin, D. G. Robertson, Phys. Rev. D 90, no.7, 073010 (2014). [arXiv:1407.4336 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 93, no.9, 094017 (2016). [arXiv:1604.01134 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. P. Martin, D. G. Robertson, Phys. Rev. D 100, no.7, 073004 (2019). [arXiv:1907.02500 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Beneke, Phys. Lett. B 434, 115 (1998). [hep-ph/9804241].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Pineda and F. J. Yndurain, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094022 (1998).spa
dc.relation.referencesA. H. Hoang and T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D 60, 114027 (1999). [hep-ph/9904468].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. H. Hoang, A. Jain, I. Scimemi and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 151602 (2008). [arXiv:0803.4214 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. H. Chankowski, S. Pokorski and J. Rosiek, Nucl. Phys. B 423, 437 - 496 (1994). [hep-ph/9303309].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Dabelstein, Nucl. Phys. B 456, 25 (1995). [hep-ph/9503443].spa
dc.relation.referencesD. M. Pierce, J. A. Bagger, K. T. Matchev and R.J. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B 491, 3 - 67 (1997). [hep-ph/9606211].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Frank, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak and G. Weiglein, JHEP 0702, 047 (2007). [hep-ph/0611326].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 343 (1999). [hep-ph/9812472].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 39, 465 (2005). [hep-ph/0411114].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, G. Weiglein, Phys. Lett. B 652, 300-309 (2007). [arXiv:0705.0746 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Carena, M. Quiros and C. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B 461, 407 (1996). [hep-ph/9508343].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Carena, H. Haber, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, C. Wagner, and G. Weiglein, Nucl. Phys. B 580, 29 (2000). [hep-ph/0001002].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Martin, Phys. Rev. D71, 016012 (2005). [hep-ph/0405022].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Borowka, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, G. Heinrich and W. Hollik, Eur. Phys. J. C74, no.8, 2994 (2014). [arXiv:1404.7074 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Degrassi, S. Di Vita and P. Slavich, Eur. Phys. J. C75, no.2, 61 (2015). [arXiv:1410.3432 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Borowka, S. Paßehr, G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.7, 576 (2018). [arXiv:1802.09886 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Harlander, P. Kant, L. Mihaila and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 191602 (2008). Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 039901 (2008). [arXiv:0803.0672 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Harlander, P. Kant, L. Mihaila and M. Steinhauser, JHEP 1008, 104 (2010). [arXiv:1005.5709 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. L. Feng, P. Kant, S. Profumo, D. Sanford, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 131802 (2013). [arXiv:1306.2318 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesT. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, no. 14, 141801 (2014). [arXiv:1312.4937 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Bagnaschi, G. F. Giudice, P. Slavich, and A. Strumia, JHEP 1409, 092 (2014). [arXiv:1407.4081 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Draper, G. Lee, C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D89, no.5, 055023 (2014). [arXiv:1312.5743 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Lee and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D92, 075032 (2015). [arXiv:1508.00576 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro, JHEP 1507, 159 (2015). [arXiv:1504.05200 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Bagnaschi, J. Pardo Vega, P. Slavich, Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.5, 334 (2017). [arXiv:1703.08166 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Bahl, JHEP 1902, 121 (2019). [arXiv:1812.06452 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Bagnaschi, F. Brümmer, W. Buchmüller, A. Voigt, and G. Weiglein, JHEP 1603, 158 (2016). [arXiv:1512.07761 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Bahl, W. Hollik, JHEP 1807, 182 (2018). [arXiv:1805.00867 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesN. Murphy, H. Rzehak, (2019) [arXiv:1909.00726 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, S. Paßehr, P. Slavich, (2019). [arXiv:1908.01670 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesL. N. Mihaila, J. Salomon, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 151602 (2012). [arXiv:1201.5868 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesL. N. Mihaila, J. Salomon, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. D 86, 096008 (2012). [arXiv:1208.3357 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesK. G. Chetyrkin and M. F. Zoller, JHEP 1206, 033 (2012). [arXiv:1205.2892 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. V. Bednyakov, A. F. Pikelner, and V. N. Velizhanin, Phys. Lett. B 722, 336–340 (2013). [arXiv:1212.6829 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesK. G. Chetyrkin and M. F. Zoller, JHEP 1304, 091 (2013). [Erratum: JHEP 1309, 155 (2013)]. [arXiv:1303.2890 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. V. Bednyakov, A. F. Pikelner, and V. N. Velizhanin, Nucl. Phys. B 875, 552–565 (2013). [arXiv:1303.4364 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. P. Martin and D. G. Robertson, Phys. Rev. D 100, no.7, 073004 (2019). [arXiv:1907.02500 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR.V. Harlander, J. Klappert, A. Voigt. (2019) [arXiv:1910.03595 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesB. Allanach, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143, 305 - 331 (2002). [hep-ph/0104145].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur and G. Moultaka, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 426–455 (2007). [hep-ph/0211331].spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. S. Lee, M. Carena, J. Ellis, A. Pilaftsis and C. E. M. Wagner, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 312 - 331 (2009). [arXiv:0712.2360 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. V. Harlander, J. Klappert, A. Voigt, Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.12, 814 (2017). [arXiv:1708.05720 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR.V. Harlander, J. Klappert, A.D. Ochoa, A. Voigt, Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.10, 874 (2018). [arXiv:1807.03509 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Athron, M. Bach, D. Harries, T. Kwasnitza, J. Park, D. Stöckinger, A. Voigt, J. Ziebell, Comput. Phys. Commun. 230, 145-217 (2018). [arXiv:1710.03760 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Athron, M. Bach, D. Harries, W. Kotlarski, T. Kwasnitza, J. Park, T. Steudtner, D. Stöckinger, A. Voigt, J. Ziebell, [arXiv:1810.05371 [hep-ph]] (2018).spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Lee and C. Wagner, MhEFT package, http://gabrlee.com/code (2016).spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Bahl and W. Hollik, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, no. 9, 499 (2016). [arXiv:1608.01880 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Athron, J. Park, D. Stöckinger and A. Voigt, Comput. Phys. Commun. 190, 139 - 172 (2015). [arXiv:1406.2319 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1077-1086 (2010). [arXiv:0909.2863 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 808-833 (2011). [arXiv:1002.0840 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1792-1809 (2013). [arXiv:1207.0906 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1773 - 1790 (2014). [arXiv:1309.7223 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesW. Porod and F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2458 - 2469 (2012). [arXiv:1104.1573 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Staub and W. Porod, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 338 (2017). [arXiv:1703.03267 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein, Comput. Phys. Commun. 124, 76 - 89 (2000). [hep-ph/9812320].spa
dc.relation.referencesT. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak and G. Weiglein, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1426 - 1427 (2009).spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Bahl, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.1, 57 (2018). [arXiv:1706.00346 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesT. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001). [hep-ph/0012260].spa
dc.relation.referencesV. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 432-444 (2016). [arXiv:1601.01167 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesD. Stockinger, JHEP 0503, 076 (2005). [hep-ph/0503129].spa
dc.relation.referencesC. Gnedinger et al., Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.7, 471 (2017). [arXiv:1705.01827 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesL. V. Avdeev, G. A. Chochia and A. A. Vladimirov, Phys. Lett. B 105, 272 (1981).spa
dc.relation.referencesL. V. Avdeev and A. A. Vladimirov, Nucl. Phys. B 219, 262 (1983).spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Jegerlehner, Eur. Phys. J. C18, 673-679 (2001). [hep-th/0005255].spa
dc.relation.referencesC. Studerus, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1293-1300 (2010). [arXiv:0912.2546 [physics.comp-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Freitas, JHEP 1611, 145 (2016) [arXiv:1609.09159 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Bauberger, A. Freitas, [arXiv:1702.02996 [hep-ph]] (2017).spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Bauberger, A. Freitas, D. Wiegand, JHEP 2001, 024 (2020). [arXiv:1908.09887 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Piessens, E. de Doncker-Kapenga, C. W. Überhuber, D. K. Kahanger, Quadpack, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (1983).spa
dc.relation.referencesK. Briggs, doubledouble version 2.2, boutell.com/fracster-src/doubledouble/doubledouble.html.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, T. Zirke, Comput. Phys. Comm. 196, 470-491 (2015). [arXiv:1502.06595 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesO. V. Tarasov, Nucl. Phys. B 502, 455-482 (1997). [hep-ph/9703319].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Mertig and R. Scharf, Comput. Phys. Commun. 111, 265-273 (1998). [hep-ph/9801383].spa
dc.relation.referencesL. Mihaila, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013, 607807 (2013). [arXiv:1310.6178 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesD. J. Broadhurst, Z. Phys. C 54, 599 (1992).spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Fleischer and M. Y. Kalmykov, Phys. Lett. B 470, 168 (1999). [hep-ph/9910223].spa
dc.relation.referencesD. J. Broadhurst, Eur. Phys. J. C 8, 311 (1999). [hep-th/9803091].spa
dc.relation.referencesA. I. Davydychev and M. Y. Kalmykov, Nucl. Phys. B 699, 3 (2004). [hep-th/0303162].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Y. Kalmykov, Nucl. Phys. B 718, 276 (2005). [hep-ph/0503070].spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Y. Kalmykov, JHEP 0604, 056 (2006). [hep-th/0602028].spa
dc.relation.referencesV. V. Bytev, M. Y. Kalmykov and B. A. Kniehl, Nucl. Phys. B 836, 129 (2010). [0904.0214].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. P. Martin, D. G. Robertson, Phys. Rev. D95, no.1, 016008 (2017). [arXiv:1610.07720 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Marquard, N. Zerf, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1153–1171 (2014). [arXiv:1309.1731 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Marquard, L. Mihaila, J.H. Piclum, M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B 773, 1-18 (2007). [hep-ph/0702185].spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Draper, H. Rzehak Phys. Rept. 619, 1-24 (2016). [arXiv:1601.01890 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.feynhiggs.de/cgi-bin/fhman.cgi?man=FHSetFlagsspa
dc.relation.referencesK. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuehn, M. Steinhauser, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133, 43-65 (2000). [arXiv:0004189 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesB. Schmidt, M. Steinhauser, (2012). [arXiv:1201.6149 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Herren, M. Steinhauser, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 333-345 (2018). [arXiv:1703.03751 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesN. K. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B 101, 173 (1975).spa
dc.relation.referencesC. Ford, I. Jack and D. R. T. Jones, Nucl. Phys. B 387, 373 (1992). [Erratum-ibid. B 504, 551 (1997)]. [hep-ph/0111190].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 89, 013003 (2014). [arXiv:1310.7553 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesS. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 92, no. 5, 054029 (2015). [arXiv:1508.00912 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.relation.referencesR. A. Flores and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D 27, 1679 (1983).spa
dc.relation.referencesB. Kastening, Phys. Lett. B 283, 287-292 (1992).spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Bando, T. Kugo, N. Maekawa, H. Nakano, Phys. Lett. B 301, 83-89 (1993). [hep-ph/9210228].spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Isidori, G. Ridolfi and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B, 609, 387 (2001). [hep-ph/0104016].spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. R. Espinosa and R. -J. Zhang, JHEP 0003, 026 (2000). [arXiv:9912236 [hep-ph]].spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc530 - Físicaspa
dc.subject.proposalrMSSMeng
dc.subject.proposalrMSSMspa
dc.subject.proposalSQCDeng
dc.subject.proposalSQCDspa
dc.subject.proposalhiggs boson masseng
dc.subject.proposalmasa del boson de higgsspa
dc.subject.proposalsupersimetríaspa
dc.subject.proposalsupersymmetryeng
dc.subject.proposalauto-energíaspa
dc.subject.proposalself-energyeng
dc.subject.proposaltadpolespa
dc.subject.proposaltadpoleeng
dc.subject.proposalintegral del vacíospa
dc.subject.proposalvacuum integraleng
dc.subject.proposaldispersion methodeng
dc.subject.proposalmétodo de dispersiónspa
dc.subject.proposalestabilidad del vacíospa
dc.subject.proposalvacuum stabilityeng
dc.titleNNLO Vacuum Stability Analysis in the SM and the Higgs Bosons of the MSSM at Three-Loop Accuracyspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_dc82b40f9837b551spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/updatedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
80858503-2020.pdf
Tamaño:
2.99 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.8 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: