Evaluación de una planta de gasificación integrada a un ciclo de descarbonatación de caliza para la producción simultánea de CO2, energía eléctrica, energía térmica y otros productos de alto valor agregado

dc.contributor.advisorChejne Janna, Faridspa
dc.contributor.advisorMejía Cárdenas, Juan Manuelspa
dc.contributor.authorArroyave Roa, Juan Diegospa
dc.contributor.researchgroupTermodinámica Aplicada y Energías Alternativasspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-27T15:09:59Zspa
dc.date.available2020-02-27T15:09:59Zspa
dc.date.issued2019-10-31spa
dc.description.abstractIIn this research, an evaluation of the gas production capacity with direct application for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) from CO2 capture and generation technologies is carried out. Four power plants based on coal gasification, combustion and oxy-fuel combustion integrated with post-combustion and pre-combustion CO2 capture methods are compared, through a thermodynamic evaluation. An integrated gasification combined cycle plant integrated with a Calcium Looping Process (CaL) is evaluated for the generation of electric power, CO2 and CaO as a clinker precursor. In this way, is used a two-phase model for the coal gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed and a particle model is proposed to simulate the operating conditions that govern the chemical reaction and phenomena of sintering and overlapping of grains in CaL. According to the results, it is possible to conclude that a CO2 capture system decreases the energy and exergy efficiency of the plant, since additional energy consumption is required for the regeneration of the sorbent and for the CO2 capture up to 90%. However, in CaL it is possible to carry out an energy integration to improve the overall performance of the plant and the exergoeconomic cost of the products of interest, especially CO2 (31 COP/kg). For its part, the particle model studied in the CaL process allows predict the material durability and its reuse during several cycles of CO2 capture.spa
dc.description.abstractEn el presente estudio se realiza una evaluación de la capacidad de producción de gas con aplicación directa para recobro mejorado de petróleo (EOR) a partir de tecnologías de generación y captura de CO2. Mediante una evaluación termodinámica, se comparan cuatro plantas basadas en gasificación, combustión y oxicombustión de carbón, integradas con métodos de captura de CO2 pos-combustión y pre-combustión. También se evalúa una planta de gasificación de carbón integrada a un ciclo combinado de potencia y a un ciclo de carbonatación-calcinación de caliza (CaL) para la generación de potencia eléctrica, CO2 y CaO como precursor de clínker. Para ello, se emplea un modelo de dos fases para simular la gasificación de carbón en lecho fluidizado burbujeante y se propone un modelo de partícula para simular las condiciones de operación que gobiernan la reacción química y fenómenos de sinterización y traslape de granos en CaL. Se puede concluir que un sistema de captura de CO2 disminuye la eficiencia energética y exergética de la planta, dado que se requiere un consumo adicional de energía para la regeneración del sorbente y para alcanzar una captura de CO2 mayor al 90%. Sin embargo, en CaL es posible realizar una integración energética para mejorar el rendimiento global de la planta y el costo exergoeconómico de los productos de interés, especialmente del CO2 (31 COP/kg). Por su parte, el modelo de partícula estudiado en el proceso CaL permite predecir la durabilidad del material y su reutilización durante varios ciclos de captura de CO2.spa
dc.description.additionalMaestría en Ingeniería Químicaspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.projectPlan nacional para el potenciamiento de la tecnología CEOR con gas mejorado químicamente (contrato 273-2017)spa
dc.description.sponsorshipFondo Nacional de Financiamiento para la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación “Francisco José de Caldas”, Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos (ANH), Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS), Equion Energía Limitada, Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.format.extent209spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75769
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Procesos y Energíaspa
dc.relation.referencesE. Yáñez, A. Ramírez, A. Uribe, E. Castillo, and A. Faaij, “Unravelling the potential of energy efficiency in the Colombian oil industry,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 176, pp. 604–628, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Rudyk, S. Hussain, and P. Spirov, “The Journal of Supercritical Fluids Supercritical extraction of crude oil by methanol- and ethanol-modified carbon dioxide,” J. Supercrit. Fluids, vol. 78, pp. 63–69, 2013spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Gazzani, M. C. Romano, and G. Manzolini, “CO2 capture in integrated steelworks by commercial-ready technologies and SEWGS process,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 41, pp. 249–267, 2015spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Adánez, A. Abad, T. Mendiara, P. Gayán, L. F. de Diego, and F. García-Labiano, “Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 65, pp. 6–66, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesD. F. Vallejos Cifuentes, “Efecto de la peletización de biomasa sobre el desempeño del proceso gasificación en un reactor de lecho fluidizado - Caso de estudio: cascarilla de arroz,” Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín, 2018spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Cau, V. Tola, and P. Deiana, “Comparative performance assessment of USC and IGCC power plants integrated with CO2 capture systems,” Fuel, vol. 116, pp. 820–833, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesV. Tola and A. Pettinau, “Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies,” Appl. Energy, vol. 113, pp. 1461–1474, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesB. M. Abraham, J. G. Asbury, and E. P. Lynch, “Coal-oxygen process provides CO2 for enhanced recovery,” Oil Gas J., vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 68–75, 1982.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Kramp, A. Thon, E. U. Hartge, S. Heinrich, and J. Werther, “Carbon Stripping - A Critical Process Step in Chemical Looping Combustion of Solid Fuels,” Chem.Eng. Technol., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 497–507, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesF. J. Velasco-Sarria, C. R. Forero, I. Adánez-Rubio, A. Abad, and J. Adánez, “Assessment of low-cost oxygen carrier in South-western Colombia, and its use in the in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion technology,” Fuel, vol. 218, no.May 2017, pp. 417–424, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Sundqvist, M. Arjmand, T. Mattisson, M. Rydén, and A. Lyngfelt, “Screening of different manganese ores for chemical-looping combustion (CLC) and chemicallooping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU),” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 43, pp. 179–188, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Pérez-Vega et al., “Chemical Looping Combustion of gaseous and solid fuels with manganese-iron mixed oxide as oxygen carrier,” Energy Convers. Manag.,vol. 159, no. September 2017, pp. 221–231, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Kraussler, M. Binder, P. Schindler, and H. Hofbauer, “Hydrogen production within a polygeneration concept based on dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasification,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 111, pp. 320–329, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Sakwattanapong, A. Aroonwilas, and A. Veawab, “Reaction rate of CO2 in aqueous MEA-AMP solution: Experiment and modeling,” Energy Procedia, vol. 1,no. 1, pp. 217–224, 2009spa
dc.relation.referencesC. C. Lin, Y. H. Lin, and C. S. Tan, “Evaluation of alkanolamine solutions for carbon dioxide removal in cross-flow rotating packed beds,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 175, no. 1–3, pp. 344–351, 2010spa
dc.relation.referencesC. C. Cormos and L. Petrescu, “Evaluation of calcium looping as carbon capture option for combustion and gasification power plants,” Energy Procedia, vol. 51, pp.154–160, 2013spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Casero, F. G. Peña, P. Coca, and J. Trujillo, “ELCOGAS 14 MWth precombustion carbon dioxide capture pilot. Technical & economical achievements,” Fuel, vol. 116, no. July, pp. 804–811, 2014spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Parraga, K. R. Khalilpour, and A. Vassallo, “Polygeneration with biomassintegrated gasification combined cycle process: Review and prospective,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 92, no. March, pp. 219–234, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Hikita, S. Asai, H. Ishikawa, and M. Honda, “The kinetics of reactions of carbon dioxide with monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine by a rapid mixing method,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 1977.spa
dc.relation.referencesK. Li, W. Leigh, P. Feron, H. Yu, and M. Tade, “Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO 2 capture process: Techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements,” Appl. Energy, vol. 165, pp. 648–659, 2016spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Rostamian and M. N. Lotfollahi, “Modified Redlich-Kwong and Peng-Robinson Equations of State for solubility calculation of solid compounds in supercritical carbon dioxide,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 16, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesY. Cao, B. He, G. Ding, L. Su, and Z. Duan, “Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2capture schemes,” Energy, vol. 140, pp. 47–57, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Bejan, G. Tsatsaronis, and M. Moran, “Thermal Design and Optimization-John Wiley & Sons (1995).pdf.” pp. 1–542, 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesV. Chou, A. Lyengar, V. Shah, and M. Woods, “Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Supplement: Sensivity to CO2 capture Rate in Coal-Fired Power Plants,” 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesN. S. Siefert, B. Y. Chang, and S. Litster, “Exergy and economic analysis of a CaOlooping gasifier for IGFC-CCS and IGCC-CCS,” Appl. Energy, vol. 128, pp. 230–245, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Hartman, O. Trnka, and M. Pohořelý, “Minimum and terminal velocities in fluidization of particulate ceramsite at ambient and elevated temperature,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 46, no. 22, pp. 7260–7266, 2007.spa
dc.relation.references] C. Sánchez, E. Arenas, F. Chejne, C. A. Londoño, S. Cisneros, and J. C. Quintana, “A new model for coal gasification on pressurized bubbling fluidized bed gasifiers,”Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 126, pp. 717–723, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Rolfe, Y. Huang, M. Haaf, S. Rezvani, A. Dave, and N. J. Hewitt, “Technoeconomic and Environmental Analysis of Calcium Carbonate Looping for CO2Capture from a Pulverised Coal-Fired Power Plant,” Energy Procedia, vol. 142, pp. 3447–3453, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. C. Maya, F. Chejne, C. A. Gómez, and S. K. Bhatia, “Effect of the CaO sintering on the calcination rate of CaCO3 under atmospheres containing CO2,” AIChE J., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3638–3648, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. E. Evangelos and V. S. Stratis, “A partially overlapping grain model for gas-solid reactions,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1201–1212, 1993.spa
dc.relation.referencesY. Wu, J. Blamey, E. J. Anthony, and P. S. Fennell, “Morphological changes of limestone sorbent particles during carbonation/calcination looping cycles in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) and reactivation with steam,” Energy and Fuels, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2768–2776, 2010.spa
dc.relation.references[116] M. C. Romano, “Modeling the carbonator of a Ca-looping process for CO 2 capture from power plant flue gas,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 257–269, 2012.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddcIngeniería químicaspa
dc.subject.proposalCaptura de CO2spa
dc.subject.proposalCO2 captureeng
dc.subject.proposalEnhanced oil recoveryeng
dc.subject.proposalRecobro mejorado de petróleospa
dc.subject.proposalCalizaspa
dc.subject.proposalLimestoneeng
dc.titleEvaluación de una planta de gasificación integrada a un ciclo de descarbonatación de caliza para la producción simultánea de CO2, energía eléctrica, energía térmica y otros productos de alto valor agregadospa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1115087857.2019.pdf
Tamaño:
4.33 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Química

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.9 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: