Modelo de evaluación de éxito de sistemas E-government para administraciones tributarias: Reconociendo la creación del valor público desde la perspectiva del contribuyente

dc.contributor.advisorDiaz Pinzón, Beatriz Helenaspa
dc.contributor.authorJaimes Martínez, Cindy Paolaspa
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3627-3361spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gisticspa
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-13T17:41:07Z
dc.date.available2025-06-13T17:41:07Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramasspa
dc.description.abstractLas Administraciones tributarias adoptan sistemas e-government para poner a disposición de sus contribuyentes y demás partes interesadas, información y servicios a través de internet con el fin de que éstos cumplan sus obligaciones fiscales de manera eficiente. Estos sistemas de información (en adelante SI) son importantes y relevantes para el cumplimiento de la misionalidad estatal delegada a estas organizaciones públicas, el cual consiste en la correcta gestión del recaudo tributario a la par de velar por el cumplimiento de la normatividad tributaria vigente. Al ser herramientas tan importantes para el cumplimiento de los objetivos institucionales de este tipo de organizaciones, es necesario estructurar un modelo de evaluación que permita explicar y comprender si estos sistemas e-government son exitosos, a la par de reconocer, si estas iniciativas gubernamentales construyen valor público, el cual empieza a referenciarse en la literatura académica como un beneficio central que deben percibir los contribuyentes, su usuario objetivo. Por lo anterior, el objetivo principal del presente estudio es determinar un modelo de evaluación de éxito de sistemas e-government para administraciones tributarias, que reconozca la construcción del valor público desde la perspectiva del contribuyente (G2C – G2B). Con un enfoque epistemológico y metodológico del realismo crítico, se utilizan métodos mixtos de corte transversal, en la cual mediante aplicación de una Revisión Sistemática de Literatura, entrevistas a expertos y encuestas a 312 contribuyentes, se busca explicar las interrelaciones entre los mecanismos causales del modelo propuesto. Tomando como referentes constructos propios del modelo de éxito de SI de DeLone y McLean (1992, 2003) tales como Calidad del sistema, calidad de la información, calidad del servicio, uso, satisfacción del usuario, beneficios organizacionales y beneficios individuales, en el desarrollo de la investigación se agregan dimensiones como capacidad de adaptación por cambios normativos, valor público, beneficios ambientales y beneficios sociales, los cuales enriquecen el proceso de evaluación para este contexto. Entre los hallazgos centrales de la investigación, se pudo determinar que la percepción de valores públicos como la confianza, la participación, el compromiso ciudadano, la transparencia, la comunicación constante y la equidad por parte de los contribuyentes, son creados por la satisfacción positiva del usuario, y a su vez, son beneficios que contribuyen al éxito de este tipo de SI, lo cual es un aporte central de la presente investigación y es una ampliación al cuerpo de conocimiento existente sobre sistemas de información, teoría del éxito de SI, tributación y administración pública. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractTax administrations adopt e-government systems to make information and services available to their taxpayers and other stakeholders through the Internet so that they can efficiently meet their tax obligations. These information systems (hereinafter IS) are important and relevant for the fulfillment of the state’s mission delegated to these public organizations, which consists of the correct management of tax collection while ensuring compliance with current tax regulations. As these are such important tools for the fulfillment of the institutional objectives of this type of organization, it is necessary to structure an evaluation model that allows explaining and understanding whether these e-government systems are successful, while recognizing whether these government initiatives build public value, which is beginning to be referenced in academic literature as a central benefit that should be perceived by taxpayers, their target users. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to determine a model for evaluating the E-government’s success systems for tax administrations, which recognizes the construction of public value from taxpayer’s perspective (G2C – G2B). With an epistemological and methodological approach of critical realism, mixed cross-sectional methods are used, in which through the application of systematic literature review, interviews with experts and surveys of 312 taxpayers, the interrelations between the causal mechanisms of the proposed model are explained. Taking as references constructs from the IS success model of DeLone & McLean (1992, 2003) such as quality system, quality information, quality service, usage, user’s satisfaction, organizational benefits and individual benefits, in the development of the research dimensions such as adaptability to regulatory changes, public value, environmental benefits and social benefits are added, which enrich the evaluation process for this context. Among the central research’s findings, it was possible to determine that the public values’ perception such as trust, participation, citizen commitment, transparency, constant communication and equity on the part of taxpayers, are created by positive user’s satisfaction, additionally, there are benefits that contribute to the success of this type of IS, which is a central contribution of this research and is an extension to the existing body of knowledge on information systems, IS success theory, taxation and public administration.eng
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Administraciónspa
dc.description.researchareaGestión Funcional - Sistemas de información gerencialspa
dc.format.extentxvii, 231 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88224
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Doctorado en Administraciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAbdelsalam, H., & Reddick, G. (2012). Success and Failure of Local E- Government Projects: Lessons Learned from Egypt. En S. Kwamena Aikins, Managing E-Government Projects: Concepts, Issues, and Best Practices.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbdulkareem, A., & Mohd Ramli, R. (2021). Does trust in e-government influence the performance of e-government? An integration of information system success model and public value theory . Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(1), 1-17.spa
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlhendawi, K., & Baharudin, A. (2017). The Assesment of Information System Effectiveness in e-Learning, e-commerce and e-Government Contexts: A Critical Review and Conceptual Model. . Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95, 4897-4912.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlhyari, S., Alazab, M., Alazab, A., Venkatraman, S., & Alazab, M. (2013). Performance evaluation of e-government services using balanced scorecard: An empirical study in Jordan. Benchmarking, 20(4), 512–536.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlkraiji, A. (2020). An examination of citizen satisfaction with mandatory e-government services: comparison of two information systems success models. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 36-58.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Naimat, A., & Fraihat, A. (2020). E-Government's Service Quality; User perception Significance and Measurement. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20(10), 101-107.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Rahmi, W., Uddin, M. &., Aldhlan, K., Cifuentes Faura, J., Al-Rahmi, A., & Al-Adwan, A. (2022). Validation of an Integrated IS Success Model in the Study of E-Government. Mobile Information Systems, 1-16.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Sulami, Z., & Hashim, H. (2018). Measuring the success of e-government systems: Applying the success model of the delone and mclean information system. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(22), 7654-7670.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlthonayan, M., & Althonayan, A. (2017). E-government system evaluation: The case of users’ performance using ERP systems in higher education. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(3), 306-342. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2015-0045.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Investigating the impact of citizens’ trust toward the successful adoption of e-government: A multigroup analysis of gender, age, and internet experience. Information Systems Management, 35(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1440730.spa
dc.relation.referencesAL-Zahrani, M. (2020). Integrating IS success model with cybersecurity factors for e-government implementation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10 (5), 4937-4955- Doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4937-4955.spa
dc.relation.referencesAndersen, K. N., Henriksen, H. Z., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J. N., Sannarnes, M. K., & Enemærke, M. (2010). Fads and Facts of e-Government: A Review of Impacts of e-Government (2003–2009). International Journal of Public Administration 33(11), 564–579.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnwer Anwer, M., Esichaikul, V., Rehman, M., & Anjum, M. (2016). E-government services evaluation from citizen satisfaction perspective: A case of Afghanistan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 139-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2015-0017.spa
dc.relation.referencesBailey, J., & Pearson, S. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer. Management Science., 29(5), 530–545.spa
dc.relation.referencesBakon, K. A., & Elias, N. F. (2020). Culture and Digital Divide Influence on E-Government Success of Developing Countries: A Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 1362-1378.spa
dc.relation.referencesBannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, Public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for Research. Government Information Quartely, 31(1), 119-128.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarbosa, A. F., Pozzebon, M., & Diniz, E. H. (2013). Rethinking E-Government Performance Assessment from a Citizen Perspective. Public Administration, 91(3), 744-762.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public Value Theory & Practice. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.spa
dc.relation.referencesBhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press, 284.spa
dc.relation.referencesBhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science. Londres: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBhaskar, R. (2011). Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.spa
dc.relation.referencesBryson, J., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.spa
dc.relation.referencesByrd, T., Thrasher, E., Lang, T., & Davidson, N. (2006). A process-oriented perspective of IS success: examining the impact of IS on operational cost. Omega 34(5), 448–460.spa
dc.relation.referencesCanales Cerón, M. (2006). Metodologías de investigación social . Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarrera Mora, O. Y., Villafuerte Valdés, L. F., Romero León, D. A., & Reyes Mendoza, S. (2021). Local e-government in México in times of covid-19. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 26(94), 678-695.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastañeda Rodríguez, V. M. (2012). UNA REVISIÓN DE LOS DETERMINANTES DE LA ESTRUCTURA Y EL RECAUDO TRIBUTARIO: EL CASO LATINOAMERICANO TRAS LA CRISIS DE LA DEUDA EXTERNA. Cuadernos de Economía, 31(58), 77-112.spa
dc.relation.referencesCatólico Segura, D., Suárez Barreto, S. Y., & Velandia Espitia, J. P. (2016). El gobierno electrónico en las administraciones tributarias de America Latina. Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 7(2), 50-65.spa
dc.relation.referencesCebreiro López, B., & Fernández Morante, M. (2004). Estudio de casos. En F. Salvador Mata, J. L. Rodríguez Diéguez, & A. Bolívar Botia, Diccionario enciclopédico de didáctica. Málaga: Aljibe.spa
dc.relation.referencesCEPAL. (2011). El gobierno electrónico en la gestión pública. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.spa
dc.relation.referencesChae, H. C. (2007). IS success model and perceived IT value. Association for Information Systems. 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007: Reaching New Heights, 7, (págs. 4808–4813).spa
dc.relation.referencesChan, S. C., & Ngai, E. W. (2007). A qualitative study of information technology adoption: How ten organizations adopted web-based training. Information Systems Journal, 17(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J., Capistrano, E. P., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing – An application of the IS success model and trust theory. Computer in Human Behavior,43, 251–262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, S.-C., Wu, C.-C., & Miau, S. (2015). Constructing an integrated e-invoice system: The Taiwan experience. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 370-383.spa
dc.relation.referencesCochcrane Iberoamérica. (01 de 05 de 2005). https://es.cochrane.org/es. Obtenido de https://es.cochrane.org/sites/es.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/glosario_manual_cochrane_425.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCórdoba, J.-R. (2014). Systemic patterns of practice to improve e-government evaluation. Public Administration and Information Technology, 5, 9-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4), 60-95.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4) , 9-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeng, H., Karunasena, K., & Xu, W. (2018). Evaluating the performance of e-Government in developing countries: A public value perspective. Internet Research, 28(1), 169–190. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0296.spa
dc.relation.referencesDIAN. (08 de 12 de 2021). www.dian.gov.co. Obtenido de dian.gov.co/dian/cifras/Paginas/TributosDIAN.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Metodología de investigación en educación médica, 162-167.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoll, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 259–275.spa
dc.relation.referencesEaston, G., & Harrison, D. (2004). Temporally Embedded Case Comparison in Industrial Marketing Research. En S. Fleetwood, & S. Ackroyd, Critical Realism Applications in Organization and Management Studies (págs. 194-210). Londres: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2016). Exploratory – Sequential Aproach. En W. A. Edmonds, An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (págs. 201 – 207). Los Angeles: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesElla, W. (2020). ASSESSING CORRELATION ON E-GOVERNMENT AND TRUST AT LOCAL LEVEL IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences 2(3), 237-246.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Pérez, J., & Cuervo Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición (6) 1, 27-36.spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández-Santillán, J. (2018). Valor público, gobernanza y Tercera Vía. Convergencia , 175-193.spa
dc.relation.referencesFishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publication Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesFiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.spa
dc.relation.referencesFloropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek Taxation Information System. International Journal of Information Management 30, 47–56.spa
dc.relation.referencesFu, J. R., Farn, C. K., & Chao, W. P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax filing: a study of taxpayer intentions. . Informantion & Management, 43., 109-126.spa
dc.relation.referencesFuruholt, B., & Wahid, F. ( 2008). E-Government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: The Case of Sragen. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI, USA: IEEE.spa
dc.relation.referencesGable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 377-408.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcia-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600 | e28600.spa
dc.relation.referencesGatian, A. (1994). Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? Information & Management, 26(3), 119–131.spa
dc.relation.referencesGemoets, L., Mahmood, M., Adenso-Díaz, B., & Gonzalez, P. (2011). A cross-national comparison of e-government success measures: A theory-based empirical research. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 184-208.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoh, J. M., & Arenas, A. E. (2020). IT Value Creation in Public Sector: How IT-Enabled Capabilities Mitigate Tradeoffs in Public Organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 25–43.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez Sabaini, J.C.; Morán, D. (2020). Estrategias para abordar la evasión tributaria en América Latina y el Caribe: avances en su medición y panorama de las medidas recientes para reducir su magnitud. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2007). E-government success: some principles from a Spanish case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(6), 845-861.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quaterly, 19(2), 213–236.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134-148.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrover, V., Lyytinen, K., Srinivasan, A., & Tan, B. (2008). Contributing to Rigorous and Forward Thinking Explanatory Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 40-47.spa
dc.relation.referencesGupta, K. P., Singh, S., & Bhaskar, P. (2016). Citizen Adoption of e-Government: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. Electronic Government, an International Journal 12(2), 160–85.spa
dc.relation.referencesGupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365–387.spa
dc.relation.referencesHabermas, J. (1984). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Volumen 1 y 2. . Boston, Massachussets: Beacon Press Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Hult, T., Danks, N., & Soumya, R. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A workbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesHefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 14(2), 171–190.spa
dc.relation.referencesHenman, P. (2010). Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesHenseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.spa
dc.relation.referencesHidayat Ur Rehman, I., Ali Turi, J., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Alam, M., & Pilař, L. (2023). The role of awareness in appraising the success of E-government systems. Cogent Business & Management, 10, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2186739.spa
dc.relation.referencesHooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Clarifying the role of e-Government Trust in e-Government Success Models: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 27, Doi: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4079.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoran, T. A., Abhichandani, T., & Rayalu, R. (2006). Assessing user satisfaction of egovernment services: development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information systems (ATIS). Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS’06).spa
dc.relation.referencesHu, G., Lin, H., & Pan, W. (2013). Conceptualizing and Examining e-Government Service Capability: A Review and Empirical Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(11), 2379-2395.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2014). Usability and Credibility of E-Government Websites. Government Information Quarterly, 584-595.spa
dc.relation.referencesIbbott, C. J., & O’Keefe, R. M. (2004). Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system. Information Systems Journal 14(2), 131–152.spa
dc.relation.referencesIdoughi, D., & Abdelhakim, D. (2018). Developing Countries E-Government Services Evaluation Identifying and Testing Antecedents of Satisfaction Case of Algeria. International Journal Of Electronic Government Research, 14(1), 63-85.spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Telecommunication Union. (2024). Measuring digital development: The ICT Development Index 2024. Ginebra: ITU Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesİskender, G., & Özkan, S. (2015). Analysis of success factors in e-government transformation in Turkey: are these factors really the causes of success?. Information Development, 323-332.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaimes Martínez, C. P. (2020). ADOPCIÓN DE LA FACTURACIÓN ELECTRÓNICA Y SU INFLUENCIA EN LA ORGANIZACIÓN. CASO DE ESTUDIO: ENTIDAD DEL SECTOR AGROPECUARIO. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaimes Martínez, C. P., & Díaz Pínzón, B. H. (2022). Success evaluation model of E-government systems for tax administrations: Recognizing the public value from the taxpayer's perspective. 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Madrid: IEEE. DOI: 10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820607.spa
dc.relation.referencesJeyaraj, A. (2020). DeLone & McLean models of information system success: Critical metareview and research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102139. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102139.spa
dc.relation.referencesJonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). Conceptual Models. En J. Jonker, & B. Pennink, The Essence of Research Methodology (págs. 43-63). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.spa
dc.relation.referencesJørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values – an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354-381.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaisara, G., & Pather, S. (2011). The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 211-221.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaliannan, M., Raman, M., & Dorasamy, M. (2010). Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management. Capitulo: Assessing e-Government Services: The Case of e-Filing of Personal Income Tax in Malaysia. 317-333: IGI GLOBAL.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeutel, M., Michalik, B., & Richter, J. (2014). Towards mindful case study research in IS: a critical analysis of the past ten years. European Journal of Information Systems, 23., 256–272.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhatib, H., Lee, H., Suh, C., & Weerakkody, V. (2019). e-Government systems success and user acceptance in developing countries: The role of perceived support quality. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 1-34.spa
dc.relation.referencesKilani, Y. M. (2021). The moderating role of innovation valance between adoption and actual use of e-government services: an extension of DeLone and McLean information success model. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 26(3), 273-295.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlamo, L., Huang, W., Wang, K., & Le, T. (2006). Successfully implementing e-government: Fundamental issues and a case study in the USA. Electronic Government, 3(2), 158-173.spa
dc.relation.referencesKoh, C., & Prybutok, V. (2003). The three ring model and development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of e-government functions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 34-39.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. (2016). Sistemas de información gerencial. Décimocuarta edición. México: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York: Guilford Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, B. B., Lee, E. H., & Lee, T. (2022). The effect of E-Government website evaluation on user satisfaction and intention to use: the mediating role of warmth and competence judgment on government. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1868-1889. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2041701.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, G. L., & Pai, J. (2005). Influence of environmental and organizational factors on the success of internet‐based interorganizational systems planning. Internet Research, 15(5), 527–543.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220-230.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucas, H. (1978). Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation. MIS Quaterly, 2(2), 27–42.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e-Government: A Public Value Perspective. Public Administration Review 82(1), 23-38.spa
dc.relation.referencesMadsen, C. Ø., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2015). Channel Choice: A Literature Review. Electronic Government. Proceedings of the 14th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV 2015). Thessaloniki, Grecia.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaldonado, C. (2018). La incorporación de Tecnologías de Información y comunicación en organizaciones gubernamentales y la creación de valor. El caso de la Dirección Nacional de Migraciones (2007-2015). Buenos Aires: Universidad de San Andrés.spa
dc.relation.referencesMalodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 1-17.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Salgado, C. (2012). El muestreo en investigación cualitativa. Principios básicos y algunas controversias. Ciênc. saúde coletiva, 17(3), 613-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300006.spa
dc.relation.referencesMellouli, M., Bouaziz, F., & Bentahar, O. (2020). E-government success assessment from a public value perspective. International Review of Public Administration, 25(3), 153-174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2020.1799517.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeneses, J., & Rodriguez, D. (2011). El cuestionario y la entrevista. Universidad Abierta de Cataluña.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: what is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219.spa
dc.relation.referencesMihuandayani, Utami, E., & Luthfi, E. T. (2018). Text mining based on tax comments as big data analysis using SVM and feature selection. International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT) (págs. 537–542). IEEE.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Londrés: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information. Info Systems, 233–249.spa
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J. (2004). Real-izing Information Systems: Critical Realism as an Underpinning Philosophy for Information Systems. Information & Organization, 145-153.spa
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509.spa
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical realism in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795-802.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoore, M. H. (1994). Public value as the focus of strategy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53(3), 296-304.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government. USA: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoore, M. H. (2014). Public Value Accounting: Establishing the Philosophical Basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465–477.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorales, V., & Bayona, S. (2019). Critical success factors in the development of e-government: A systematic review of the literature | [Factores Críticos de Éxito en el Desarrollo de E-Gobierno: Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao (E23), 233-247.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorales, V., Bayona, S., & Morales, J. (2020). Categorization of critical success factors in the development of e-government | [Categorización de factores críticos de éxito en el desarrollo de e-gobierno]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 590-602.spa
dc.relation.referencesMüller, S. D., & Skau, S. A. (2015). Success factors influencing implementation of e-government at different stages of maturity: a literature review. Int. J. Electronic Governance, 7 (2), 136-170.spa
dc.relation.referencesNam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. . Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006.spa
dc.relation.referencesNguyen, T. D., Nguyen, J. M., & Cao, T. H. (2015). Information Systems Success: A Literature Review. En Lecture Notes in Computer Science (págs. 242–256). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_18.spa
dc.relation.referencesNookhao, S. K. (2023). Achieving a successful e-government: Determinants of behavioral intention from Thai citizens’ perspective. Heliyon, 9(8).spa
dc.relation.referencesNusir, M., & Bell, D. (2013). Systematic Literature Review: Taxonomy of Services in e-Government. UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/236405667766.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398–427.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz-Rodríguez, F., Mishra Tiwari, S., Amara, F. Z., & Sahagun, M. (2023). E-Government Success: An End-User Perspective. En J. M. Medina-Quintero, & A. J. Sahagun M. A., Global Perspectives on the Strategic Role of Marketing Information Systems (págs. 168-186). IGI Global.spa
dc.relation.referencesOwusu, A. (2023). Assessing the impact of e-government systems from citizens' perspective: evidence from Ghana. . Electronic Government, 19(3), 376-400. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2023.130583.spa
dc.relation.referencesOwusu, A., Akpe-Doe, C., & Taana, I. (2022). Assessing the Effectiveness of E-Government Services in Ghana: A Case of the Registrar General's Department. . International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18, 1-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesParada Corrales, J. (2004). Realismo crítico en investigación en ciencias sociales: una introducción. Investigación & Desarrollo, 12 (2), 396-429.spa
dc.relation.referencesParasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. En J. Dawson, F. A., & L. Sparks, The Retailing Reader (págs. 30-51). New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesParé, G. (2004). Investigating information systems with positivist case study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 233-264.spa
dc.relation.referencesParra Jiménez, O. D., & Patino Jacinto, R. A. (2010). Evasión de impuestos nacionales en Colombia: años 2001 - 2009. Revista Facultad De Ciencias Económicas, 18(2), 177-198.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeña, J. I., Díaz, B. H., & Favier, M. (2010). Multiméthodologie dans la recherche en systèmes d’information. Deux exemples de recherche en cours en Colombie. París.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2012). The Past, Present, and Future of “IS Success.”. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 341–362.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetter, S., Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (2013). Information systems success: the quest for the independet variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7-61.spa
dc.relation.referencesPodsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.spa
dc.relation.referencesRahman, A. (2015). Toward a Comprehensive Conceptualization of Digital Divide and its Impact on E-Government System Success. En M. Quaddus, & A. G. Woodside, E-Services Adoption: Processes by Firms in Developing (págs. 291-488). Emerald Publishing Limited. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1069-096420150000023003.spa
dc.relation.referencesRainer, R., & Watson, H. (1995). The keys to executive information system success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 83–98.spa
dc.relation.referencesRana, N., Dwivedi, Y., Williams, M., & Weerakkody, V. (2015). Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 127-142.spa
dc.relation.referencesReddick, G. (2004). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, (22), 38-57.spa
dc.relation.referencesRigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM : Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Marketing: ZFP – Journal of Research and Management, 39(3), 4–16.spa
dc.relation.referencesRingle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (Accedido: 18 de noviembre de 2024). SmartPLS 4. Disponible en: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobbins, G., Mulligan, E., & Keenan, F. (2015). e-Government in the Irish Revenue: The Revenue On-Line Service (ROS): A success story? Financial Accountability and Management, 31(4), 363-394.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuel, E., Wagner, W. E., & Gilllespie, B. J. (2016). The practice of survey research: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaunders, M. N. (2019). Capitulo 4: Understanding research philosophy and approaches ti theory development. En M. N. Saunders, P. Lewis, & A. Thornhill, Research methods for business students (págs. 128-171). Reino Unido: Pearson Education Limited.spa
dc.relation.referencesScott, M., DeLone, W., & Golden, W. (2016). Measuring eGovernment success: a public value approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 187-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.11.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeddon, P. B. (1997). respecification and extension of the DeLone and Mc Lean model of IS success. Information systems research, 8(3), 240-253.spa
dc.relation.referencesSedera, D. (2006). Enterprise system success: a measurement model. Queensland, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.spa
dc.relation.referencesShmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. (2019). Evaluación de modelos predictivos en PLS-SEM: pautas para usar PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53 (11), 2322-2347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189.spa
dc.relation.referencesSiddaway, A., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Meta-syntheses. . Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770.spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, H., Grover, P., Kar, A., & Ilavarasan, V. (2020). Review of performance assessment frameworks of e-government projects. . Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(1), Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2019-0011.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoper, D. (11 de 21 de 2024). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. . Obtenido de https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalcspa
dc.relation.referencesSorongan, E., & Hidayati, Q. (2020). Integration of eucs variables into delone and mclean models for E-government evaluation: Conceptual models. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 32-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesStefanovic, D., Marjanovic, U., Delić, M., Culibrk, D., & Lalic, B. (2016). Assessing the success of e-government systems: An employee perspective. . Information & Management, 53(6), 717–726. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.007 .spa
dc.relation.referencesSterrenberg, G., & L'Espoir Decosta, P. (2023). Identifying the crucial factors of e-government success from the perspective of Australian citizens living with disability using a public value approach. Government Information Quarterly, 40 (3), 101813.spa
dc.relation.referencesSugumaran, V., & Arogyaswamy, B. (2003). Measuring it performance: “Contingency”. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 79-86.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeo, T. S., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-131.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeo, T., & Wong, P. (2005). Implementing electronic filing of tax returns: insights form. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application, 7(2), 3-16.spa
dc.relation.referencesThomas, P. (2006). Information systems success and technology acceptance within government organization. Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, (págs. 4404–4411).spa
dc.relation.referencesTitah, R., & Barki, H. (2006). e-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 2(3), 23–57.spa
dc.relation.referencesTorres, M., Vásquez, C., & Viloria, A. (2010). GESTIÓN Y CALIDAD DE LA INFORMACIÓN EN EL GOBIERNO ELECTRÓNICO. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología.spa
dc.relation.referencesTwizeyimana, J., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 167–178.spa
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nations. (2018). UNITED NATIONS E-GOVERNMENT SURVEY 2018. New York: United Nations.spa
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nations E-government survey 2024. (2024). Nueva York: United Nations.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Maanen, J., Sørensen, J., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145-1154.spa
dc.relation.referencesVeeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161–174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004.spa
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.spa
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.spa
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., & Venkatraman, S. (2014). Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. . Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 249–269. Doi:10.1111/isj.12008.spa
dc.relation.referencesVerkijika, S., & De Wet, L. (2018). A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 20-29.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt, W. P., Vogt, E. R., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2014). Selecting the right analyses. New York: Guilford.spa
dc.relation.referencesWakhu, S., He, J., & Xu, F. (2019). The 3D Integrated Model for E-Government Systems Success: A Case of the e-EIA System in Kenya. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ARCHIVES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 29(1), 63-78.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717–733.spa
dc.relation.referencesWestland, J. (2012). Erratum to ‘‘Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling’’. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (10), 445; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.001.spa
dc.relation.referencesWestland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (9), 476-487.spa
dc.relation.referencesWill, D. J. (1981). Roy Bhaskar, A realist theory of science, Brighton, Sussex, Harvester Press, 1978, (1st ed., 1975), 8vo, pp. 284, £3.95 (paperback). - Roy Bhaskar, The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Medical History, 25(1), 91-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesWynn, D., & Williams, C. (2012). PRINCIPLES FOR CONDUCTING CRITICAL REALIST CASE STUDY RESEARCH IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787-810.spa
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. (2003). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc350 - Administración pública y ciencia militar::351 - Administración públicaspa
dc.subject.ddc000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::003 - Sistemasspa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::336 - Finanzas públicasspa
dc.subject.proposalSistemas e-governmentspa
dc.subject.proposalValor públicospa
dc.subject.proposalModelo de evaluación de éxito de SIspa
dc.subject.proposalAdministraciones tributariasspa
dc.subject.proposalGestión públicaspa
dc.subject.proposalE-government systemseng
dc.subject.proposalPublic valueeng
dc.subject.proposalIS success evaluation modeleng
dc.subject.proposalTax administrationseng
dc.subject.proposalPublic managementeng
dc.subject.unescoTributaciónspa
dc.subject.unescoTaxationeng
dc.subject.unescoGobierno electrónicospa
dc.subject.unescoElectronic governanceeng
dc.subject.wikidatasistema de pago electrónicospa
dc.subject.wikidatae-commerce payment systemeng
dc.titleModelo de evaluación de éxito de sistemas E-government para administraciones tributarias: Reconociendo la creación del valor público desde la perspectiva del contribuyentespa
dc.title.translatedE-government systems’ success evaluation model for tax administrations: recognizing public value creation from the taxpayer’s perspectiveeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticosspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1090412767.2025.pdf
Tamaño:
4.17 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Administración

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: