Modelo de evaluación de éxito de sistemas E-government para administraciones tributarias: Reconociendo la creación del valor público desde la perspectiva del contribuyente
dc.contributor.advisor | Diaz Pinzón, Beatriz Helena | spa |
dc.contributor.author | Jaimes Martínez, Cindy Paola | spa |
dc.contributor.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3627-3361 | spa |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gistic | spa |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-13T17:41:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-06-13T17:41:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
dc.description | ilustraciones, diagramas | spa |
dc.description.abstract | Las Administraciones tributarias adoptan sistemas e-government para poner a disposición de sus contribuyentes y demás partes interesadas, información y servicios a través de internet con el fin de que éstos cumplan sus obligaciones fiscales de manera eficiente. Estos sistemas de información (en adelante SI) son importantes y relevantes para el cumplimiento de la misionalidad estatal delegada a estas organizaciones públicas, el cual consiste en la correcta gestión del recaudo tributario a la par de velar por el cumplimiento de la normatividad tributaria vigente. Al ser herramientas tan importantes para el cumplimiento de los objetivos institucionales de este tipo de organizaciones, es necesario estructurar un modelo de evaluación que permita explicar y comprender si estos sistemas e-government son exitosos, a la par de reconocer, si estas iniciativas gubernamentales construyen valor público, el cual empieza a referenciarse en la literatura académica como un beneficio central que deben percibir los contribuyentes, su usuario objetivo. Por lo anterior, el objetivo principal del presente estudio es determinar un modelo de evaluación de éxito de sistemas e-government para administraciones tributarias, que reconozca la construcción del valor público desde la perspectiva del contribuyente (G2C – G2B). Con un enfoque epistemológico y metodológico del realismo crítico, se utilizan métodos mixtos de corte transversal, en la cual mediante aplicación de una Revisión Sistemática de Literatura, entrevistas a expertos y encuestas a 312 contribuyentes, se busca explicar las interrelaciones entre los mecanismos causales del modelo propuesto. Tomando como referentes constructos propios del modelo de éxito de SI de DeLone y McLean (1992, 2003) tales como Calidad del sistema, calidad de la información, calidad del servicio, uso, satisfacción del usuario, beneficios organizacionales y beneficios individuales, en el desarrollo de la investigación se agregan dimensiones como capacidad de adaptación por cambios normativos, valor público, beneficios ambientales y beneficios sociales, los cuales enriquecen el proceso de evaluación para este contexto. Entre los hallazgos centrales de la investigación, se pudo determinar que la percepción de valores públicos como la confianza, la participación, el compromiso ciudadano, la transparencia, la comunicación constante y la equidad por parte de los contribuyentes, son creados por la satisfacción positiva del usuario, y a su vez, son beneficios que contribuyen al éxito de este tipo de SI, lo cual es un aporte central de la presente investigación y es una ampliación al cuerpo de conocimiento existente sobre sistemas de información, teoría del éxito de SI, tributación y administración pública. (Texto tomado de la fuente). | spa |
dc.description.abstract | Tax administrations adopt e-government systems to make information and services available to their taxpayers and other stakeholders through the Internet so that they can efficiently meet their tax obligations. These information systems (hereinafter IS) are important and relevant for the fulfillment of the state’s mission delegated to these public organizations, which consists of the correct management of tax collection while ensuring compliance with current tax regulations. As these are such important tools for the fulfillment of the institutional objectives of this type of organization, it is necessary to structure an evaluation model that allows explaining and understanding whether these e-government systems are successful, while recognizing whether these government initiatives build public value, which is beginning to be referenced in academic literature as a central benefit that should be perceived by taxpayers, their target users. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to determine a model for evaluating the E-government’s success systems for tax administrations, which recognizes the construction of public value from taxpayer’s perspective (G2C – G2B). With an epistemological and methodological approach of critical realism, mixed cross-sectional methods are used, in which through the application of systematic literature review, interviews with experts and surveys of 312 taxpayers, the interrelations between the causal mechanisms of the proposed model are explained. Taking as references constructs from the IS success model of DeLone & McLean (1992, 2003) such as quality system, quality information, quality service, usage, user’s satisfaction, organizational benefits and individual benefits, in the development of the research dimensions such as adaptability to regulatory changes, public value, environmental benefits and social benefits are added, which enrich the evaluation process for this context. Among the central research’s findings, it was possible to determine that the public values’ perception such as trust, participation, citizen commitment, transparency, constant communication and equity on the part of taxpayers, are created by positive user’s satisfaction, additionally, there are benefits that contribute to the success of this type of IS, which is a central contribution of this research and is an extension to the existing body of knowledge on information systems, IS success theory, taxation and public administration. | eng |
dc.description.degreelevel | Doctorado | spa |
dc.description.degreename | Doctor en Administración | spa |
dc.description.researcharea | Gestión Funcional - Sistemas de información gerencial | spa |
dc.format.extent | xvii, 231 páginas | spa |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | spa |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ | spa |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88224 | |
dc.language.iso | spa | spa |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá | spa |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ciencias Económicas | spa |
dc.publisher.place | Bogotá, Colombia | spa |
dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Doctorado en Administración | spa |
dc.relation.references | Abdelsalam, H., & Reddick, G. (2012). Success and Failure of Local E- Government Projects: Lessons Learned from Egypt. En S. Kwamena Aikins, Managing E-Government Projects: Concepts, Issues, and Best Practices. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Abdulkareem, A., & Mohd Ramli, R. (2021). Does trust in e-government influence the performance of e-government? An integration of information system success model and public value theory . Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(1), 1-17. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Alhendawi, K., & Baharudin, A. (2017). The Assesment of Information System Effectiveness in e-Learning, e-commerce and e-Government Contexts: A Critical Review and Conceptual Model. . Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95, 4897-4912. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Alhyari, S., Alazab, M., Alazab, A., Venkatraman, S., & Alazab, M. (2013). Performance evaluation of e-government services using balanced scorecard: An empirical study in Jordan. Benchmarking, 20(4), 512–536. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Alkraiji, A. (2020). An examination of citizen satisfaction with mandatory e-government services: comparison of two information systems success models. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 36-58. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Al-Naimat, A., & Fraihat, A. (2020). E-Government's Service Quality; User perception Significance and Measurement. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20(10), 101-107. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Al-Rahmi, W., Uddin, M. &., Aldhlan, K., Cifuentes Faura, J., Al-Rahmi, A., & Al-Adwan, A. (2022). Validation of an Integrated IS Success Model in the Study of E-Government. Mobile Information Systems, 1-16. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Al-Sulami, Z., & Hashim, H. (2018). Measuring the success of e-government systems: Applying the success model of the delone and mclean information system. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(22), 7654-7670. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Althonayan, M., & Althonayan, A. (2017). E-government system evaluation: The case of users’ performance using ERP systems in higher education. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(3), 306-342. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2015-0045. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Investigating the impact of citizens’ trust toward the successful adoption of e-government: A multigroup analysis of gender, age, and internet experience. Information Systems Management, 35(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1440730. | spa |
dc.relation.references | AL-Zahrani, M. (2020). Integrating IS success model with cybersecurity factors for e-government implementation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10 (5), 4937-4955- Doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4937-4955. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Andersen, K. N., Henriksen, H. Z., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J. N., Sannarnes, M. K., & Enemærke, M. (2010). Fads and Facts of e-Government: A Review of Impacts of e-Government (2003–2009). International Journal of Public Administration 33(11), 564–579. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Anwer Anwer, M., Esichaikul, V., Rehman, M., & Anjum, M. (2016). E-government services evaluation from citizen satisfaction perspective: A case of Afghanistan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 139-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2015-0017. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bailey, J., & Pearson, S. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer. Management Science., 29(5), 530–545. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bakon, K. A., & Elias, N. F. (2020). Culture and Digital Divide Influence on E-Government Success of Developing Countries: A Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 1362-1378. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, Public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for Research. Government Information Quartely, 31(1), 119-128. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Barbosa, A. F., Pozzebon, M., & Diniz, E. H. (2013). Rethinking E-Government Performance Assessment from a Citizen Perspective. Public Administration, 91(3), 744-762. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public Value Theory & Practice. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press, 284. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science. Londres: Routledge. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bhaskar, R. (2011). Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Bryson, J., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Byrd, T., Thrasher, E., Lang, T., & Davidson, N. (2006). A process-oriented perspective of IS success: examining the impact of IS on operational cost. Omega 34(5), 448–460. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Canales Cerón, M. (2006). Metodologías de investigación social . Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Carrera Mora, O. Y., Villafuerte Valdés, L. F., Romero León, D. A., & Reyes Mendoza, S. (2021). Local e-government in México in times of covid-19. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 26(94), 678-695. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Castañeda Rodríguez, V. M. (2012). UNA REVISIÓN DE LOS DETERMINANTES DE LA ESTRUCTURA Y EL RECAUDO TRIBUTARIO: EL CASO LATINOAMERICANO TRAS LA CRISIS DE LA DEUDA EXTERNA. Cuadernos de Economía, 31(58), 77-112. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Católico Segura, D., Suárez Barreto, S. Y., & Velandia Espitia, J. P. (2016). El gobierno electrónico en las administraciones tributarias de America Latina. Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 7(2), 50-65. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cebreiro López, B., & Fernández Morante, M. (2004). Estudio de casos. En F. Salvador Mata, J. L. Rodríguez Diéguez, & A. Bolívar Botia, Diccionario enciclopédico de didáctica. Málaga: Aljibe. | spa |
dc.relation.references | CEPAL. (2011). El gobierno electrónico en la gestión pública. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Chae, H. C. (2007). IS success model and perceived IT value. Association for Information Systems. 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007: Reaching New Heights, 7, (págs. 4808–4813). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Chan, S. C., & Ngai, E. W. (2007). A qualitative study of information technology adoption: How ten organizations adopted web-based training. Information Systems Journal, 17(3). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Chen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J., Capistrano, E. P., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing – An application of the IS success model and trust theory. Computer in Human Behavior,43, 251–262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Chen, S.-C., Wu, C.-C., & Miau, S. (2015). Constructing an integrated e-invoice system: The Taiwan experience. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 370-383. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Cochcrane Iberoamérica. (01 de 05 de 2005). https://es.cochrane.org/es. Obtenido de https://es.cochrane.org/sites/es.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/glosario_manual_cochrane_425.pdf | spa |
dc.relation.references | Córdoba, J.-R. (2014). Systemic patterns of practice to improve e-government evaluation. Public Administration and Information Technology, 5, 9-24. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. | spa |
dc.relation.references | DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4), 60-95. | spa |
dc.relation.references | DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4) , 9-30. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Deng, H., Karunasena, K., & Xu, W. (2018). Evaluating the performance of e-Government in developing countries: A public value perspective. Internet Research, 28(1), 169–190. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0296. | spa |
dc.relation.references | DIAN. (08 de 12 de 2021). www.dian.gov.co. Obtenido de dian.gov.co/dian/cifras/Paginas/TributosDIAN.aspx | spa |
dc.relation.references | Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Metodología de investigación en educación médica, 162-167. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Doll, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 259–275. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Easton, G., & Harrison, D. (2004). Temporally Embedded Case Comparison in Industrial Marketing Research. En S. Fleetwood, & S. Ackroyd, Critical Realism Applications in Organization and Management Studies (págs. 194-210). Londres: Routledge. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2016). Exploratory – Sequential Aproach. En W. A. Edmonds, An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (págs. 201 – 207). Los Angeles: Sage. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ella, W. (2020). ASSESSING CORRELATION ON E-GOVERNMENT AND TRUST AT LOCAL LEVEL IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences 2(3), 237-246. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Escobar Pérez, J., & Cuervo Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición (6) 1, 27-36. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fernández-Santillán, J. (2018). Valor público, gobernanza y Tercera Vía. Convergencia , 175-193. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publication Company. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek Taxation Information System. International Journal of Information Management 30, 47–56. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Fu, J. R., Farn, C. K., & Chao, W. P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax filing: a study of taxpayer intentions. . Informantion & Management, 43., 109-126. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Furuholt, B., & Wahid, F. ( 2008). E-Government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: The Case of Sragen. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI, USA: IEEE. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 377-408. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Garcia-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600 | e28600. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gatian, A. (1994). Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? Information & Management, 26(3), 119–131. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gemoets, L., Mahmood, M., Adenso-Díaz, B., & Gonzalez, P. (2011). A cross-national comparison of e-government success measures: A theory-based empirical research. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 184-208. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Goh, J. M., & Arenas, A. E. (2020). IT Value Creation in Public Sector: How IT-Enabled Capabilities Mitigate Tradeoffs in Public Organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 25–43. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gómez Sabaini, J.C.; Morán, D. (2020). Estrategias para abordar la evasión tributaria en América Latina y el Caribe: avances en su medición y panorama de las medidas recientes para reducir su magnitud. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2007). E-government success: some principles from a Spanish case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(6), 845-861. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quaterly, 19(2), 213–236. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134-148. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Grover, V., Lyytinen, K., Srinivasan, A., & Tan, B. (2008). Contributing to Rigorous and Forward Thinking Explanatory Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 40-47. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gupta, K. P., Singh, S., & Bhaskar, P. (2016). Citizen Adoption of e-Government: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. Electronic Government, an International Journal 12(2), 160–85. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365–387. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Habermas, J. (1984). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Volumen 1 y 2. . Boston, Massachussets: Beacon Press Books. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Hult, T., Danks, N., & Soumya, R. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A workbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 14(2), 171–190. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Henman, P. (2010). Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hidayat Ur Rehman, I., Ali Turi, J., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Alam, M., & Pilař, L. (2023). The role of awareness in appraising the success of E-government systems. Cogent Business & Management, 10, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2186739. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Clarifying the role of e-Government Trust in e-Government Success Models: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 27, Doi: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4079. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Horan, T. A., Abhichandani, T., & Rayalu, R. (2006). Assessing user satisfaction of egovernment services: development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information systems (ATIS). Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS’06). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Hu, G., Lin, H., & Pan, W. (2013). Conceptualizing and Examining e-Government Service Capability: A Review and Empirical Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(11), 2379-2395. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2014). Usability and Credibility of E-Government Websites. Government Information Quarterly, 584-595. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ibbott, C. J., & O’Keefe, R. M. (2004). Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system. Information Systems Journal 14(2), 131–152. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Idoughi, D., & Abdelhakim, D. (2018). Developing Countries E-Government Services Evaluation Identifying and Testing Antecedents of Satisfaction Case of Algeria. International Journal Of Electronic Government Research, 14(1), 63-85. | spa |
dc.relation.references | International Telecommunication Union. (2024). Measuring digital development: The ICT Development Index 2024. Ginebra: ITU Publications. | spa |
dc.relation.references | İskender, G., & Özkan, S. (2015). Analysis of success factors in e-government transformation in Turkey: are these factors really the causes of success?. Information Development, 323-332. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jaimes Martínez, C. P. (2020). ADOPCIÓN DE LA FACTURACIÓN ELECTRÓNICA Y SU INFLUENCIA EN LA ORGANIZACIÓN. CASO DE ESTUDIO: ENTIDAD DEL SECTOR AGROPECUARIO. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jaimes Martínez, C. P., & Díaz Pínzón, B. H. (2022). Success evaluation model of E-government systems for tax administrations: Recognizing the public value from the taxpayer's perspective. 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Madrid: IEEE. DOI: 10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820607. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jeyaraj, A. (2020). DeLone & McLean models of information system success: Critical metareview and research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102139. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102139. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). Conceptual Models. En J. Jonker, & B. Pennink, The Essence of Research Methodology (págs. 43-63). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values – an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354-381. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Kaisara, G., & Pather, S. (2011). The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 211-221. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Kaliannan, M., Raman, M., & Dorasamy, M. (2010). Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management. Capitulo: Assessing e-Government Services: The Case of e-Filing of Personal Income Tax in Malaysia. 317-333: IGI GLOBAL. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Keutel, M., Michalik, B., & Richter, J. (2014). Towards mindful case study research in IS: a critical analysis of the past ten years. European Journal of Information Systems, 23., 256–272. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Khatib, H., Lee, H., Suh, C., & Weerakkody, V. (2019). e-Government systems success and user acceptance in developing countries: The role of perceived support quality. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 1-34. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Kilani, Y. M. (2021). The moderating role of innovation valance between adoption and actual use of e-government services: an extension of DeLone and McLean information success model. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 26(3), 273-295. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Klamo, L., Huang, W., Wang, K., & Le, T. (2006). Successfully implementing e-government: Fundamental issues and a case study in the USA. Electronic Government, 3(2), 158-173. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Koh, C., & Prybutok, V. (2003). The three ring model and development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of e-government functions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 34-39. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. (2016). Sistemas de información gerencial. Décimocuarta edición. México: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York: Guilford Publications. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Lee, B. B., Lee, E. H., & Lee, T. (2022). The effect of E-Government website evaluation on user satisfaction and intention to use: the mediating role of warmth and competence judgment on government. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1868-1889. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2041701. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Lee, G. L., & Pai, J. (2005). Influence of environmental and organizational factors on the success of internet‐based interorganizational systems planning. Internet Research, 15(5), 527–543. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Lee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220-230. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Lucas, H. (1978). Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation. MIS Quaterly, 2(2), 27–42. | spa |
dc.relation.references | MacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e-Government: A Public Value Perspective. Public Administration Review 82(1), 23-38. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Madsen, C. Ø., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2015). Channel Choice: A Literature Review. Electronic Government. Proceedings of the 14th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV 2015). Thessaloniki, Grecia. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Maldonado, C. (2018). La incorporación de Tecnologías de Información y comunicación en organizaciones gubernamentales y la creación de valor. El caso de la Dirección Nacional de Migraciones (2007-2015). Buenos Aires: Universidad de San Andrés. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 1-17. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Martínez-Salgado, C. (2012). El muestreo en investigación cualitativa. Principios básicos y algunas controversias. Ciênc. saúde coletiva, 17(3), 613-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300006. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mellouli, M., Bouaziz, F., & Bentahar, O. (2020). E-government success assessment from a public value perspective. International Review of Public Administration, 25(3), 153-174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2020.1799517. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Meneses, J., & Rodriguez, D. (2011). El cuestionario y la entrevista. Universidad Abierta de Cataluña. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: what is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mihuandayani, Utami, E., & Luthfi, E. T. (2018). Text mining based on tax comments as big data analysis using SVM and feature selection. International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT) (págs. 537–542). IEEE. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Londrés: Sage. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information. Info Systems, 233–249. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mingers, J. (2004). Real-izing Information Systems: Critical Realism as an Underpinning Philosophy for Information Systems. Information & Organization, 145-153. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Mingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical realism in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795-802. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Moore, M. H. (1994). Public value as the focus of strategy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53(3), 296-304. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government. USA: Harvard University Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Moore, M. H. (2014). Public Value Accounting: Establishing the Philosophical Basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465–477. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Morales, V., & Bayona, S. (2019). Critical success factors in the development of e-government: A systematic review of the literature | [Factores Críticos de Éxito en el Desarrollo de E-Gobierno: Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao (E23), 233-247. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Morales, V., Bayona, S., & Morales, J. (2020). Categorization of critical success factors in the development of e-government | [Categorización de factores críticos de éxito en el desarrollo de e-gobierno]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 590-602. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Müller, S. D., & Skau, S. A. (2015). Success factors influencing implementation of e-government at different stages of maturity: a literature review. Int. J. Electronic Governance, 7 (2), 136-170. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. . Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, J. M., & Cao, T. H. (2015). Information Systems Success: A Literature Review. En Lecture Notes in Computer Science (págs. 242–256). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_18. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Nookhao, S. K. (2023). Achieving a successful e-government: Determinants of behavioral intention from Thai citizens’ perspective. Heliyon, 9(8). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Nusir, M., & Bell, D. (2013). Systematic Literature Review: Taxonomy of Services in e-Government. UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings 2013. | spa |
dc.relation.references | OECD. (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/236405667766. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398–427. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ortiz-Rodríguez, F., Mishra Tiwari, S., Amara, F. Z., & Sahagun, M. (2023). E-Government Success: An End-User Perspective. En J. M. Medina-Quintero, & A. J. Sahagun M. A., Global Perspectives on the Strategic Role of Marketing Information Systems (págs. 168-186). IGI Global. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Owusu, A. (2023). Assessing the impact of e-government systems from citizens' perspective: evidence from Ghana. . Electronic Government, 19(3), 376-400. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2023.130583. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Owusu, A., Akpe-Doe, C., & Taana, I. (2022). Assessing the Effectiveness of E-Government Services in Ghana: A Case of the Registrar General's Department. . International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18, 1-21. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Parada Corrales, J. (2004). Realismo crítico en investigación en ciencias sociales: una introducción. Investigación & Desarrollo, 12 (2), 396-429. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. En J. Dawson, F. A., & L. Sparks, The Retailing Reader (págs. 30-51). New York: Routledge. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Paré, G. (2004). Investigating information systems with positivist case study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 233-264. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Parra Jiménez, O. D., & Patino Jacinto, R. A. (2010). Evasión de impuestos nacionales en Colombia: años 2001 - 2009. Revista Facultad De Ciencias Económicas, 18(2), 177-198. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Peña, J. I., Díaz, B. H., & Favier, M. (2010). Multiméthodologie dans la recherche en systèmes d’information. Deux exemples de recherche en cours en Colombie. París. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2012). The Past, Present, and Future of “IS Success.”. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 341–362. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Petter, S., Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (2013). Information systems success: the quest for the independet variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7-61. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rahman, A. (2015). Toward a Comprehensive Conceptualization of Digital Divide and its Impact on E-Government System Success. En M. Quaddus, & A. G. Woodside, E-Services Adoption: Processes by Firms in Developing (págs. 291-488). Emerald Publishing Limited. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1069-096420150000023003. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rainer, R., & Watson, H. (1995). The keys to executive information system success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 83–98. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., Williams, M., & Weerakkody, V. (2015). Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 127-142. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Reddick, G. (2004). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, (22), 38-57. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM : Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Marketing: ZFP – Journal of Research and Management, 39(3), 4–16. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (Accedido: 18 de noviembre de 2024). SmartPLS 4. Disponible en: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Robbins, G., Mulligan, E., & Keenan, F. (2015). e-Government in the Irish Revenue: The Revenue On-Line Service (ROS): A success story? Financial Accountability and Management, 31(4), 363-394. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ruel, E., Wagner, W. E., & Gilllespie, B. J. (2016). The practice of survey research: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Saunders, M. N. (2019). Capitulo 4: Understanding research philosophy and approaches ti theory development. En M. N. Saunders, P. Lewis, & A. Thornhill, Research methods for business students (págs. 128-171). Reino Unido: Pearson Education Limited. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Scott, M., DeLone, W., & Golden, W. (2016). Measuring eGovernment success: a public value approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 187-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.11. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Seddon, P. B. (1997). respecification and extension of the DeLone and Mc Lean model of IS success. Information systems research, 8(3), 240-253. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sedera, D. (2006). Enterprise system success: a measurement model. Queensland, Australia: Queensland University of Technology. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. (2019). Evaluación de modelos predictivos en PLS-SEM: pautas para usar PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53 (11), 2322-2347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Siddaway, A., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Meta-syntheses. . Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Singh, H., Grover, P., Kar, A., & Ilavarasan, V. (2020). Review of performance assessment frameworks of e-government projects. . Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(1), Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2019-0011. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Soper, D. (11 de 21 de 2024). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. . Obtenido de https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sorongan, E., & Hidayati, Q. (2020). Integration of eucs variables into delone and mclean models for E-government evaluation: Conceptual models. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 32-42. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Stefanovic, D., Marjanovic, U., Delić, M., Culibrk, D., & Lalic, B. (2016). Assessing the success of e-government systems: An employee perspective. . Information & Management, 53(6), 717–726. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.007 . | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sterrenberg, G., & L'Espoir Decosta, P. (2023). Identifying the crucial factors of e-government success from the perspective of Australian citizens living with disability using a public value approach. Government Information Quarterly, 40 (3), 101813. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Sugumaran, V., & Arogyaswamy, B. (2003). Measuring it performance: “Contingency”. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 79-86. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Teo, T. S., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-131. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Teo, T., & Wong, P. (2005). Implementing electronic filing of tax returns: insights form. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application, 7(2), 3-16. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Thomas, P. (2006). Information systems success and technology acceptance within government organization. Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, (págs. 4404–4411). | spa |
dc.relation.references | Titah, R., & Barki, H. (2006). e-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 2(3), 23–57. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Torres, M., Vásquez, C., & Viloria, A. (2010). GESTIÓN Y CALIDAD DE LA INFORMACIÓN EN EL GOBIERNO ELECTRÓNICO. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Twizeyimana, J., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 167–178. | spa |
dc.relation.references | United Nations. (2018). UNITED NATIONS E-GOVERNMENT SURVEY 2018. New York: United Nations. | spa |
dc.relation.references | United Nations E-government survey 2024. (2024). Nueva York: United Nations. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145-1154. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161–174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., & Venkatraman, S. (2014). Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. . Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 249–269. Doi:10.1111/isj.12008. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Verkijika, S., & De Wet, L. (2018). A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 20-29. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Vogt, W. P., Vogt, E. R., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2014). Selecting the right analyses. New York: Guilford. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wakhu, S., He, J., & Xu, F. (2019). The 3D Integrated Model for E-Government Systems Success: A Case of the e-EIA System in Kenya. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ARCHIVES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 29(1), 63-78. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717–733. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Westland, J. (2012). Erratum to ‘‘Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling’’. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (10), 445; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.001. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (9), 476-487. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Will, D. J. (1981). Roy Bhaskar, A realist theory of science, Brighton, Sussex, Harvester Press, 1978, (1st ed., 1975), 8vo, pp. 284, £3.95 (paperback). - Roy Bhaskar, The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Medical History, 25(1), 91-92. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Wynn, D., & Williams, C. (2012). PRINCIPLES FOR CONDUCTING CRITICAL REALIST CASE STUDY RESEARCH IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787-810. | spa |
dc.relation.references | Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
dc.rights.license | Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional | spa |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | spa |
dc.subject.ddc | 350 - Administración pública y ciencia militar::351 - Administración pública | spa |
dc.subject.ddc | 000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::003 - Sistemas | spa |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 - Economía::336 - Finanzas públicas | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Sistemas e-government | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Valor público | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Modelo de evaluación de éxito de SI | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Administraciones tributarias | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Gestión pública | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | E-government systems | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Public value | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | IS success evaluation model | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Tax administrations | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Public management | eng |
dc.subject.unesco | Tributación | spa |
dc.subject.unesco | Taxation | eng |
dc.subject.unesco | Gobierno electrónico | spa |
dc.subject.unesco | Electronic governance | eng |
dc.subject.wikidata | sistema de pago electrónico | spa |
dc.subject.wikidata | e-commerce payment system | eng |
dc.title | Modelo de evaluación de éxito de sistemas E-government para administraciones tributarias: Reconociendo la creación del valor público desde la perspectiva del contribuyente | spa |
dc.title.translated | E-government systems’ success evaluation model for tax administrations: recognizing public value creation from the taxpayer’s perspective | eng |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Doctorado | spa |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 | spa |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | spa |
dc.type.content | Text | spa |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis | spa |
dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD | spa |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | spa |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Investigadores | spa |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Público general | spa |
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Responsables políticos | spa |
oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- 1090412767.2025.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 4.17 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Tesis de Doctorado en Administración
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 5.74 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción: