Towards a framework building for social systems modelling

dc.contributor.advisorÁlvarez Zapata, Hernán Daríospa
dc.contributor.authorAwad Aubad, Gabriel Albertospa
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGIDIA: Grupo de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificialspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-16T20:00:47Zspa
dc.date.available2020-04-16T20:00:47Zspa
dc.date.issued2017-11-01spa
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de esta tesis doctoral es construir un marco conceptual para los sistemas sociales utilizando el formalismo de especificación de sistemas de eventos discretos (DEVS) para modelar y simular propiedades, interacciones y procesos específicos de los sistemas sociales. La introducción contiene una breve historia del campo del modelado y la simulación, presenta el concepto de ciencia, justifica el enfoque constructivista de los sistemas y presenta las preguntas de investigación, los objetivos y las contribuciones esperadas. El segundo capítulo establece conceptos generales sobre los sistemas sociales, describe su composición, su estructura y su entorno, y explica su comportamiento. Esto es seguido por una discusión de los conceptos de emergencia, autoorganización y computación social. El tercer capítulo presenta conceptos básicos sobre modelado y simulación, justifica el uso de modelos y compara enfoques de modelado simples y complejos. Luego, demuestra la simulación como una nueva frontera en la ciencia y establece el modelado y la simulación (M&S) como un campo unificado e independiente. Esto es seguido por una descripción de los diferentes formalismos de especificación del sistema y su relación con el manejo del tiempo. Finalmente, muestra DEVS y sus extensiones. El cuarto capítulo presenta cómo OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysMLTM) se utiliza para modelar sistemas sociales. Describe un nuevo enfoque de la taxonomía de SysML, muestra diagramas SysML relacionados con propósitos, explica diagramas SysML asociados con la estructura y presenta cómo usar diagramas SysML para representar el comportamiento de un sistema social. El quinto capítulo describe la propuesta marco. Explica el papel de las teorías sociales en las plantillas computacionales, presenta el séxtuplo de modelos computacionales, propone un marco para el modelado y la simulación de sistemas sociales usando DEVS, y muestra un ejemplo del marco propuesto basado en el modelo básico de Agent_Zero.spa
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this doctoral thesis is to build a conceptual framework for social systems using discrete event system specification (DEVS) formalism to model and simulate specific properties, interactions, and processes of social systems. The introduction contains a brief history of the field of modelling and simulation, introduces the concept of science, justifies the constructivist approach to systems, and presents the research questions, the objectives, and the expected contributions. The second chapter establishes general concepts about social systems, describes their composition, their structure, and their environment, and explains their behaviour. This is followed by a discussion of the concepts of emergence, self-organization, and social computations. The third chapter presents basic concepts about modelling and simulation, justifies the use of models, and compares simple and complex modelling approaches. Then, it demonstrates simulation as a new frontier in science and establishes modelling and simulation (M&S) as a unified and independent field. This is followed by a description of different system specification formalisms and their relationship with time handling. Finally, it depicts DEVS and its extensions. The fourth chapter introduces how OMG Systems Modelling Language (OMG SysMLTM) is used to model social systems. It describes a new approach to the taxonomy of SysML, shows SysML diagrams related to purposes, explains SysML diagrams associated with the structure, and presents how to use SysML diagrams for depicting the behaviour of a social system. The fifth chapter describes the framework proposal. It explains the role of social theories in computational templates, presents the sextuple of computational models, proposes a framework for the modelling and simulation of social systems using DEVS, and shows an example of the proposed framework based on basic Agent_Zero’s model.spa
dc.description.additionalDoctor en Ingeniería – Ingeniería de sistemasspa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.format.extent129spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationAWAD, G. (2017). Towards a framework building for social systems modelling (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, Medellín, Colombia).spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77424
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.relation.referencesAckoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl Rowaei, A. A., Buss, A. H., & Lieberman, S. (2011). The effects of time advance mechanism on simple agent behaviors in combat simulations. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 2431–2442). Winter Simulation Conference. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2431809spa
dc.relation.referencesAmbler, S. W. (2005). The Elements of UML (TM) 2.0 Style. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesAuerhahn, K. (2008). Dynamic systems simulation analysis: A planning tool for the new century. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(4), 293–300.spa
dc.relation.referencesAumann, C. A. (2007). A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems. Ecological Modelling, 202(3), 385–396.spa
dc.relation.referencesAxelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 203–226.spa
dc.relation.referencesAxelrod, R. (2003). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences-Japanese journal for management information systems. Special Issue on Agent-Based Modeling, 12(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesAyyub, B. M., & Klir, G. J. (2006). Uncertainty modeling and analysis in engineering and the sciences. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman & Hall/ CRC Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBall, P. (2004). The physical modelling of human social systems. Complexus, 1(4), 190–206.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarros Brito, T., Trevisan, E. F. C., & Botter, R. C. (2011). A conceptual comparison between discrete and continuous simulation to motivate the hybrid simulation methodology. In Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2011 Winter (pp. 3910–3922). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6148082/spa
dc.relation.referencesBarros, F. J. (1997). Modeling formalisms for dynamic structure systems. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 7(4), 501–515.spa
dc.relation.referencesBejan, A., & Merkx, G. W. (2007). Constructal theory of social dynamics. New York, New York: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesBird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., & Lightfoot, E. N. (2004). Transport phenomena. 2002. JohnWiley & Sons, New York.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoon, M., Leitgeb, H., Niiniluoto, I., Seppälä, P., & Sober, E. (2017). Philosophy of science in practice: A proposal for epistemological constructivism. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress. College Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorshchev, A., & Filippov, A. (2004). From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference of the system dynamics society (Vol. 22). Retrieved from https://www.anylogic.ru/upload/iblock/296/296cb8fa43251a1fc803e435b93c8ff2.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesBoulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory—the skeleton of science. Management Science, 2(3), 197–208.spa
dc.relation.referencesBunge, M. A. (1974). The concept of social structure. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science (Vol. 6, pp. 175–215). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesBunge, M. A. (1979). Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: A World of Systems. (Vol. 4). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesBunge, M. A. (2000). Systemism: the alternative to individualism and holism. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 29(2), 147–157.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarley, K. M. (2009). Computational modeling for reasoning about the social behavior of humans. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 15(1), 47–59.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis (Vol. 28). Cambridge university press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 591.spa
dc.relation.referencesChiang, A. C. (2005). Fundamental methods of mathematical economics. Retrieved from http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF2016034993spa
dc.relation.referencesCioffi-Revilla, C. (2009). Simplicity and reality in computational modeling of politics. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 15(1), 26–46.spa
dc.relation.referencesCioffi-Revilla, C. (2014). On the Quality of a Social Simulation Model: A Lifecycle Framework. In Advances in Social Simulation (pp. 13–23). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_2spa
dc.relation.referencesColeman, J. S. (1974). Systems of Social Exchange. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the Methodology of Social Science (Vol. 6, pp. 149–173). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesColeman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesColeman, J. S. (1992). The vision of foundations of social theory. Analyse & Kritik, 14(2), 117–128.spa
dc.relation.referencesConte, R., Edmonds, B., Moss, S., & Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Sociology and social theory in agent based social simulation: A symposium. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 7(3), 183–205.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 480–499.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Marchi, S. (2005). Computational and mathematical modeling in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Wolf, T., & Holvoet, T. (2004). Emergence versus self-organisation: Different concepts but promising when combined. In International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications (pp. 1–15). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F11494676_1spa
dc.relation.referencesDelligatti, L. (2013). SysML distilled: A brief guide to the systems modeling language. Addison-Wesley.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiallo, S. Y., Padilla, J. J., Gore, R., Herencia-Zapana, H., & Tolk, A. (2014). Toward a formalism of modeling and simulation using model theory. Complexity, 19(3), 56–63.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdmonds, B., & Gershenson, C. (2015). 13. Modelling complexity for policy: opportunities and challenges. Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy, 205.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdmonds, B., & Möhring, M. (2005). Agent-based simulation modeling in social and organizational domains. Simulation, 81(3), 173–174.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdmonds, B., & Moss, S. (2004). From KISS to KIDS–an ‘anti-simplistic’modelling approach. In International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation (pp. 130–144). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F978-3-540-32243-6_11spa
dc.relation.referencesEpstein, J. M. (1999). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4(5), 41–60.spa
dc.relation.referencesEpstein, J. M. (2008). Why model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 12.spa
dc.relation.referencesEpstein, J. M. (2013). Agent_Zero: Toward neurocognitive foundations for generative social science. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFinance, G. (2010). SysML modelling language explained. The Object Management Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesForrester, J. W. (1987). Lessons from system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 3(2), 136–149.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalán, J. M., Izquierdo, L. R., Izquierdo, S. S., Santos, J. I., Del Olmo, R., López-Paredes, A., & Edmonds, B. (2009). Errors and artefacts in agent-based modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(1), 1.spa
dc.relation.referencesGale, S. (1974). Evolutionary laws in the social sciences. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the Methodology of Social Science (Vol. 6, pp. 309–336). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarson, G. D. (2009). Computerized simulation in the social sciences: a survey and evaluation. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 267–279.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeorgiou, I. (2003). The idea of emergent property. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(3), 239–247.spa
dc.relation.referencesGiaglis, G. M., Paul, R. J., & Hlupic, V. (1999). Integrating simulation in organizational design studies. International Journal of Information Management, 19(3), 219–236.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).spa
dc.relation.referencesGlucina, M. D., & Mayumi, K. (2010). Connecting thermodynamics and economics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185(1), 11–29.spa
dc.relation.referencesGottinger, H.-W. (1974). Toward fuzzy reasoning in the behavioral sciences. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science (Vol. 6, pp. 287–308). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., … others. (2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198(1), 115–126.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D. L., Polhill, J. G., Giske, J., & Railsback, S. F. (2010). The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221(23), 2760–2768.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrüne-Yanoff, T., & Weirich, P. (2010). The philosophy and epistemology of simulation: A review. Simulation & Gaming, 41(1), 20–50.spa
dc.relation.referencesHall, C. W. (1999). Laws and models: science, engineering, and technology. CRC Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHangos, K. M., & Cameron, I. T. (2001). A formal representation of assumptions in process modelling. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 25(2), 237–255.spa
dc.relation.referencesHanneman, R. A. (1995). Simulation modeling and theoretical analysis in sociology. Sociological Perspectives, 38(4), 457–462.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229–1245.spa
dc.relation.referencesHartmann, S. (1995). Models as a tool for theory construction: Some strategies of preliminary physics. Herfel et Al, 49–67.spa
dc.relation.referencesHartmann, S. (1996). The world as a process. In Modelling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view (pp. 77–100). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-8686-3_5spa
dc.relation.referencesHartmann, W. R., Manchanda, P., Nair, H., Bothner, M., Dodds, P., Godes, D., … Tucker, C. (2008). Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 19(3–4), 287–304.spa
dc.relation.referencesHause, M., & others. (2006). The sysml modelling language. In Fifteenth European Systems Engineering Conference (Vol. 9). Retrieved from http://omgsysml.org/The_SysML_Modelling_Language.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHeath, S. K., Brailsford, S. C., Buss, A., & Macal, C. M. (2011). Cross-paradigm simulation modeling: challenges and successes. In Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2011 Winter (pp. 2783–2797). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6147983/spa
dc.relation.referencesHelbing, D. (2010). Quantitative sociodynamics: stochastic methods and models of social interaction processes. Springer Science & Business Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesHidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575.spa
dc.relation.referencesHieronymi, A. (2013). Understanding systems science: A visual and integrative approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(5), 580–595.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012). Temporal networks. Physics Reports, 519(3), 97–125.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoukes, W., & Zwart, S. D. (2012). Transfer and templates in scientific modeling. Retrieved from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9407spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, C.-C. (2011). Discrete event system modeling using SysML and model transformation. Georgia Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/45830spa
dc.relation.referencesHumphreys, P. (1995). Computational science and scientific method. Minds and Machines, 5(4), 499–512.spa
dc.relation.referencesHumphreys, P. (1997). Computational empiricism. In Topics in the Foundation of Statistics (pp. 119–130). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-8816-4_13spa
dc.relation.referencesHumphreys, P. (2002). Computational models. Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), S1–S11.spa
dc.relation.referencesHumphreys, P. (2004). Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHumphreys, P. (2009). The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods. Synthese, 169(3), 615–626.spa
dc.relation.referencesHunter, J. D. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing In Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55spa
dc.relation.referencesJasny, L. (2007). Corporate Interlock. In A. Bejan & G. W. Merkx (Eds.), Constructal Theory of Social Dynamics (pp. 247–262). New York, New York: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesJovanovski, B., Minovski, R., Voessner, S., & Lichtenegger, G. (2012). Combining system dynamics and discrete event simulations: Overview of hybrid simulation models. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 10(3), 135–142.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlir, G. J. (2005). Uncertainty and information: foundations of generalized information theory. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesKnuuttila, T., & Loettgers, A. (2012). The productive tension: Mechanisms vs. templates in modeling the phenomena. Representations, Models, and Simulations, 2–24.spa
dc.relation.referencesKnuuttila, T., & Loettgers, A. (2016a). Model templates within and between disciplines: from magnets to gases–and socio-economic systems. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(3), 377–400.spa
dc.relation.referencesKnuuttila, T., & Loettgers, A. (2016b). Modelling as Indirect Representation? The Lotka–Volterra Model Revisited. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, axv055.spa
dc.relation.referencesKwapień, J., & Drożdż, S. (2012). Physical approach to complex systems. Physics Reports, 515(3), 115–226.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeinfellner, W., & Köhler, E. (1974). Developments in the methodology of social science (Vol. 6). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesLevis, A. H. (2009). Simple versus realistic modeling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 15(1), 5.spa
dc.relation.referencesLindenberg, S. (1992). The method of decreasing abstraction. Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique, 1, 6.spa
dc.relation.referencesLjung, L. (1998). System identification. In Signal analysis and prediction (pp. 163–173). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4612-1768-8_11spa
dc.relation.referencesLjung, L. (2010a). Approaches to identification of nonlinear systems. In Control Conference (CCC), 2010 29th Chinese (pp. 1–5). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5572936/spa
dc.relation.referencesLjung, L. (2010b). Perspectives on system identification. Annual Reviews in Control, 34(1), 1–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesLjung, L., & Glad, T. (1994). Modeling of dynamic systems. Retrieved from http://engineering.ju.edu.jo/ar/Arabic/Lists/Courses/Attachments/105/MX-0908543-Hydraulic%20and%20Pneumatic%20Control-Feb-2014-Spring.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesLouie, M. A., & Carley, K. M. (2008). Balancing the criticisms: Validating multi-agent models of social systems. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 16(2), 242–256.spa
dc.relation.referencesMalerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (1999). ’History-friendly’models of industry evolution: the computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 3–40.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarsden, P. V. (2005). Recent developments in network measurement. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, 8, 30.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarsili, M., Mastromatteo, I., & Roudi, Y. (2013). On sampling and modeling complex systems. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2013(09), P09003.spa
dc.relation.referencesMazher, A. K. (2000). Toward a Unified Approach to Modeling and Computer Simulation of Social Systems. In Workshop on Norms and Institutions in Multi-Agent Systems, 4th International Conferen-Perspektive nove europske jezične politike: Nova višejezičnost i učenje stranih jezika. Retrieved from http://ccs.mit.edu/dell/aa2001/paper1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMeissner, W., & Wold, N. (1974). The Foundation of Science on Cognitive Mini Models. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the Methodology of Social Science (Vol. 6, pp. 111–146). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerkx, G. W. (2007). Constructal Models in Social Processes. In A. Bejan & G. W. Merkx (Eds.), Constructal Theory of Social Dynamics (pp. 35–50). New York, New York: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesMitchell, M. (2011). Complexity: A guided tour. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMurray-Smith, R. (1998). Modelling Human Control Behaviour with Context-Dependent Markov-Switching Multiple Models. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 31(26), 461–466.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorth, M. J. (2014). A theoretical formalism for analyzing agent-based models. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 2(1), 1–34.spa
dc.relation.referencesOliver, D. W. (1997). Engineering of complex systems with models. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 33(2), 667–685.spa
dc.relation.referencesPabjan, B. (2004). The use of models in sociology. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 336(1), 146–152.spa
dc.relation.referencesPidd, M. (1999). Just modeling through: A rough guide to modeling. Interfaces, 29(2), 118–132.spa
dc.relation.referencesPolhill, J. G., Parker, D., Brown, D., & Grimm, V. (2008). Using the ODD protocol for describing three agent-based social simulation models of land-use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(2), 3.spa
dc.relation.referencesPopova, V., & Sharpanskykh, A. (2007). A formal framework for modeling and analysis of organizations. In Situational Method Engineering: Fundamentals and Experiences (pp. 343–358). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-73947-2_26spa
dc.relation.referencesRahmandad, H., & Sterman, J. (2008). Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: Comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Management Science, 54(5), 998–1014.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, S. (2008). Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(3), 278–290.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, S. (2010). Conceptual modelling: Who needs it. SCS M&S Magazine, 2, 1–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesSage, A. P., & Thissen, W. A. H. (1980). Methodologies for Systems Modeling. Simulation with Discrete Models: A State-of-the-Art View, TI Oren, CM Shub, PF Roth (Eds.), IEEE, New York, 45–62.spa
dc.relation.referencesSahlins, M. D. (2002). Waiting for Foucault, still. Prickly Paradigm Press Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.ugr.es/~aalvarez/observadorcultural/Documentos/Sahlins_2002.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSansores, C., & Pavón, J. (2005). Simulación social basada en agentes. Inteligencia Artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial, 9(25). Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/html/925/92592509/spa
dc.relation.referencesSawyer, R. K. (2004a). Social explanation and computational simulation. Philosophical Explorations, 7(3), 219–231.spa
dc.relation.referencesSawyer, R. K. (2004b). The mechanisms of emergence. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 260–282.spa
dc.relation.referencesSayama, H., Pestov, I., Schmidt, J., Bush, B. J., Wong, C., Yamanoi, J., & Gross, T. (2013). Modeling complex systems with adaptive networks. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 65(10), 1645–1664.spa
dc.relation.referencesSibertin-Blanc, C., Roggero, P., Adreit, F., Baldet, B., Chapron, P., El-Gemayel, J., … Sandri, S. (2013). SocLab: a framework for the modeling, simulation and analysis of power in social organizations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(4), 8.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1991). The architecture of complexity. In Facets of systems science (pp. 457–476). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_31spa
dc.relation.referencesSquazzoni, F. (2008). The micro-macro link in social simulation. Sociologica, 2(1), 0–0.spa
dc.relation.referencesSquazzoni, F. (2012). Agent-based computational sociology. John Wiley & Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesSterman, J. D. (2002). All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review, 18(4), 501–531.spa
dc.relation.referencesSun, R. (2009). Theoretical status of computational cognitive modeling. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 124–140.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuppe, F. (1974). Theories and phenomena. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science (Vol. 6, pp. 45–91). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaleb, N. N. (2016). The bed of Procrustes: philosophical and practical aphorisms. New York, New York: Random House.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe Object Management Group. (2015a). OMG systems modeling language (OMG SysML) version 1.4. The Object Management Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe Object Management Group. (2015b). OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) versión 2.5. The Object Management Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesThompson, N. S., & Derr, P. (2009). Contra Epstein, good explanations predict. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(1), 9.spa
dc.relation.referencesTolk, A., Diallo, S. Y., Padilla, J. J., & Gore, R. (2013). Epistemology of Modeling and Simulation: How can we gain Knowledge from Simulations? ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1306.5215. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5215spa
dc.relation.referencesToral, R., & Tessone, C. J. (2006). Finite size effects in the dynamics of opinion formation. ArXiv Preprint Physics/0607252. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0607252spa
dc.relation.referencesTroitzsch, K. G. (2009). Perspectives and challenges of agent-based simulation as a tool for economics and other social sciences. In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1 (pp. 35–42). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1558016spa
dc.relation.referencesVarenne, F. (2009). Models and Simulations in the Historical Emergence of the Science of Complexity. In From system complexity to emergent properties (pp. 3–21). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02199-2_1spa
dc.relation.referencesViana, J., Brailsford, S. C., Harindra, V., & Harper, P. R. (2014). Combining discrete-event simulation and system dynamics in a healthcare setting: A composite model for Chlamydia infection. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(1), 196–206.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogel, M. P. (2009). Understanding Emergent Social Phenomena Comparatively: The Need for Computational Simulation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 84–92.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Bertalanffy, L., & Sutherland, J. W. (1974). General systems theory: Foundations, developments, applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 4(6), 592–592.spa
dc.relation.referencesWarfield, J. N. (1999). Twenty laws of complexity: Science applicable in organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(1), 3.spa
dc.relation.referencesWarfield, J. N. (2003). A proposal for systems science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 20(6), 507–520.spa
dc.relation.referencesWasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge university press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeaver, W. (1991). Science and complexity. In Facets of Systems Science (pp. 449–456). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_30spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitmeyer, J. M., Khouja, M., Carmichael, T., Saric, A., Eichelberger, C., Sun, M., & Hadzikadic, M. (2008). A Computer Simulation Laboratory for Social Theories. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 2008. WI-IAT’08. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 512–515). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4740676/spa
dc.relation.referencesWu, H.-C., & Sun, C.-T. (2005). What should we do before running a social simulation? The importance of model analysis. Social Science Computer Review, 23(2), 221–234.spa
dc.relation.referencesYang, L., & Gilbert, N. (2008). Getting away from numbers: Using qualitative observation for agent-based modeling. Advances in Complex Systems, 11(02), 175–185.spa
dc.relation.referencesZeigler, B. P., Praehofer, H., & Kim, T. G. (2000). Theory of modeling and simulation: integrating discrete event and continuous complex dynamic systems (2nd ed.). San Diego, California.: Academic press.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::003 - Sistemasspa
dc.subject.proposalModelling and Simulationeng
dc.subject.proposalModelado y simulaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalSistemas socialesspa
dc.subject.proposalSocial Systemseng
dc.subject.proposalComputational templateseng
dc.subject.proposalPlantillas computacionalesspa
dc.subject.proposalSysMLspa
dc.subject.proposalSysMLeng
dc.subject.proposalDEVSeng
dc.subject.proposalDEVSspa
dc.titleTowards a framework building for social systems modellingspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
71628723.2017.pdf
Tamaño:
2.15 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería - Sistemas

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.9 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: