Towards a framework building for social systems modelling
| dc.contributor.advisor | Álvarez Zapata, Hernán Darío | spa |
| dc.contributor.author | Awad Aubad, Gabriel Alberto | spa |
| dc.contributor.corporatename | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín | spa |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup | GIDIA: Grupo de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial | spa |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-16T20:00:47Z | spa |
| dc.date.available | 2020-04-16T20:00:47Z | spa |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-11-01 | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | El objetivo de esta tesis doctoral es construir un marco conceptual para los sistemas sociales utilizando el formalismo de especificación de sistemas de eventos discretos (DEVS) para modelar y simular propiedades, interacciones y procesos específicos de los sistemas sociales. La introducción contiene una breve historia del campo del modelado y la simulación, presenta el concepto de ciencia, justifica el enfoque constructivista de los sistemas y presenta las preguntas de investigación, los objetivos y las contribuciones esperadas. El segundo capítulo establece conceptos generales sobre los sistemas sociales, describe su composición, su estructura y su entorno, y explica su comportamiento. Esto es seguido por una discusión de los conceptos de emergencia, autoorganización y computación social. El tercer capítulo presenta conceptos básicos sobre modelado y simulación, justifica el uso de modelos y compara enfoques de modelado simples y complejos. Luego, demuestra la simulación como una nueva frontera en la ciencia y establece el modelado y la simulación (M&S) como un campo unificado e independiente. Esto es seguido por una descripción de los diferentes formalismos de especificación del sistema y su relación con el manejo del tiempo. Finalmente, muestra DEVS y sus extensiones. El cuarto capítulo presenta cómo OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysMLTM) se utiliza para modelar sistemas sociales. Describe un nuevo enfoque de la taxonomía de SysML, muestra diagramas SysML relacionados con propósitos, explica diagramas SysML asociados con la estructura y presenta cómo usar diagramas SysML para representar el comportamiento de un sistema social. El quinto capítulo describe la propuesta marco. Explica el papel de las teorías sociales en las plantillas computacionales, presenta el séxtuplo de modelos computacionales, propone un marco para el modelado y la simulación de sistemas sociales usando DEVS, y muestra un ejemplo del marco propuesto basado en el modelo básico de Agent_Zero. | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | The objective of this doctoral thesis is to build a conceptual framework for social systems using discrete event system specification (DEVS) formalism to model and simulate specific properties, interactions, and processes of social systems. The introduction contains a brief history of the field of modelling and simulation, introduces the concept of science, justifies the constructivist approach to systems, and presents the research questions, the objectives, and the expected contributions. The second chapter establishes general concepts about social systems, describes their composition, their structure, and their environment, and explains their behaviour. This is followed by a discussion of the concepts of emergence, self-organization, and social computations. The third chapter presents basic concepts about modelling and simulation, justifies the use of models, and compares simple and complex modelling approaches. Then, it demonstrates simulation as a new frontier in science and establishes modelling and simulation (M&S) as a unified and independent field. This is followed by a description of different system specification formalisms and their relationship with time handling. Finally, it depicts DEVS and its extensions. The fourth chapter introduces how OMG Systems Modelling Language (OMG SysMLTM) is used to model social systems. It describes a new approach to the taxonomy of SysML, shows SysML diagrams related to purposes, explains SysML diagrams associated with the structure, and presents how to use SysML diagrams for depicting the behaviour of a social system. The fifth chapter describes the framework proposal. It explains the role of social theories in computational templates, presents the sextuple of computational models, proposes a framework for the modelling and simulation of social systems using DEVS, and shows an example of the proposed framework based on basic Agent_Zero’s model. | spa |
| dc.description.additional | Doctor en Ingeniería – Ingeniería de sistemas | spa |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Doctorado | spa |
| dc.format.extent | 129 | spa |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | spa |
| dc.identifier.citation | AWAD, G. (2017). Towards a framework building for social systems modelling (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, Medellín, Colombia). | spa |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77424 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
| dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Al Rowaei, A. A., Buss, A. H., & Lieberman, S. (2011). The effects of time advance mechanism on simple agent behaviors in combat simulations. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 2431–2442). Winter Simulation Conference. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2431809 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ambler, S. W. (2005). The Elements of UML (TM) 2.0 Style. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Auerhahn, K. (2008). Dynamic systems simulation analysis: A planning tool for the new century. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(4), 293–300. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Aumann, C. A. (2007). A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems. Ecological Modelling, 202(3), 385–396. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Axelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 203–226. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Axelrod, R. (2003). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences-Japanese journal for management information systems. Special Issue on Agent-Based Modeling, 12(3). | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ayyub, B. M., & Klir, G. J. (2006). Uncertainty modeling and analysis in engineering and the sciences. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman & Hall/ CRC Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ball, P. (2004). The physical modelling of human social systems. Complexus, 1(4), 190–206. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Barros Brito, T., Trevisan, E. F. C., & Botter, R. C. (2011). A conceptual comparison between discrete and continuous simulation to motivate the hybrid simulation methodology. In Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2011 Winter (pp. 3910–3922). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6148082/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Barros, F. J. (1997). Modeling formalisms for dynamic structure systems. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 7(4), 501–515. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Bejan, A., & Merkx, G. W. (2007). Constructal theory of social dynamics. New York, New York: Springer. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., & Lightfoot, E. N. (2004). Transport phenomena. 2002. JohnWiley & Sons, New York. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Boon, M., Leitgeb, H., Niiniluoto, I., Seppälä, P., & Sober, E. (2017). Philosophy of science in practice: A proposal for epistemological constructivism. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress. College Publishing. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Borshchev, A., & Filippov, A. (2004). From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference of the system dynamics society (Vol. 22). Retrieved from https://www.anylogic.ru/upload/iblock/296/296cb8fa43251a1fc803e435b93c8ff2.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory—the skeleton of science. Management Science, 2(3), 197–208. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Bunge, M. A. (1974). The concept of social structure. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science (Vol. 6, pp. 175–215). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Bunge, M. A. (1979). Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: A World of Systems. (Vol. 4). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Bunge, M. A. (2000). Systemism: the alternative to individualism and holism. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 29(2), 147–157. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Carley, K. M. (2009). Computational modeling for reasoning about the social behavior of humans. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 15(1), 47–59. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis (Vol. 28). Cambridge university press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 591. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Chiang, A. C. (2005). Fundamental methods of mathematical economics. Retrieved from http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF2016034993 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2009). Simplicity and reality in computational modeling of politics. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 15(1), 26–46. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2014). On the Quality of a Social Simulation Model: A Lifecycle Framework. In Advances in Social Simulation (pp. 13–23). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_2 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Coleman, J. S. (1974). Systems of Social Exchange. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the Methodology of Social Science (Vol. 6, pp. 149–173). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Coleman, J. S. (1992). The vision of foundations of social theory. Analyse & Kritik, 14(2), 117–128. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Conte, R., Edmonds, B., Moss, S., & Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Sociology and social theory in agent based social simulation: A symposium. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 7(3), 183–205. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 480–499. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | De Marchi, S. (2005). Computational and mathematical modeling in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | De Wolf, T., & Holvoet, T. (2004). Emergence versus self-organisation: Different concepts but promising when combined. In International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications (pp. 1–15). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F11494676_1 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Delligatti, L. (2013). SysML distilled: A brief guide to the systems modeling language. Addison-Wesley. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Diallo, S. Y., Padilla, J. J., Gore, R., Herencia-Zapana, H., & Tolk, A. (2014). Toward a formalism of modeling and simulation using model theory. Complexity, 19(3), 56–63. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Edmonds, B., & Gershenson, C. (2015). 13. Modelling complexity for policy: opportunities and challenges. Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy, 205. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Edmonds, B., & Möhring, M. (2005). Agent-based simulation modeling in social and organizational domains. Simulation, 81(3), 173–174. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Edmonds, B., & Moss, S. (2004). From KISS to KIDS–an ‘anti-simplistic’modelling approach. In International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation (pp. 130–144). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F978-3-540-32243-6_11 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Epstein, J. M. (1999). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4(5), 41–60. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Epstein, J. M. (2008). Why model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 12. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Epstein, J. M. (2013). Agent_Zero: Toward neurocognitive foundations for generative social science. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Finance, G. (2010). SysML modelling language explained. The Object Management Group. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Forrester, J. W. (1987). Lessons from system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 3(2), 136–149. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Galán, J. M., Izquierdo, L. R., Izquierdo, S. S., Santos, J. I., Del Olmo, R., López-Paredes, A., & Edmonds, B. (2009). Errors and artefacts in agent-based modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(1), 1. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Gale, S. (1974). Evolutionary laws in the social sciences. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the Methodology of Social Science (Vol. 6, pp. 309–336). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Garson, G. D. (2009). Computerized simulation in the social sciences: a survey and evaluation. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 267–279. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Georgiou, I. (2003). The idea of emergent property. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(3), 239–247. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Giaglis, G. M., Paul, R. J., & Hlupic, V. (1999). Integrating simulation in organizational design studies. International Journal of Information Management, 19(3), 219–236. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Glucina, M. D., & Mayumi, K. (2010). Connecting thermodynamics and economics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185(1), 11–29. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Gottinger, H.-W. (1974). Toward fuzzy reasoning in the behavioral sciences. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science (Vol. 6, pp. 287–308). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., … others. (2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198(1), 115–126. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D. L., Polhill, J. G., Giske, J., & Railsback, S. F. (2010). The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221(23), 2760–2768. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Weirich, P. (2010). The philosophy and epistemology of simulation: A review. Simulation & Gaming, 41(1), 20–50. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hall, C. W. (1999). Laws and models: science, engineering, and technology. CRC Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hangos, K. M., & Cameron, I. T. (2001). A formal representation of assumptions in process modelling. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 25(2), 237–255. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hanneman, R. A. (1995). Simulation modeling and theoretical analysis in sociology. Sociological Perspectives, 38(4), 457–462. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229–1245. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hartmann, S. (1995). Models as a tool for theory construction: Some strategies of preliminary physics. Herfel et Al, 49–67. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hartmann, S. (1996). The world as a process. In Modelling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view (pp. 77–100). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-8686-3_5 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hartmann, W. R., Manchanda, P., Nair, H., Bothner, M., Dodds, P., Godes, D., … Tucker, C. (2008). Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 19(3–4), 287–304. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hause, M., & others. (2006). The sysml modelling language. In Fifteenth European Systems Engineering Conference (Vol. 9). Retrieved from http://omgsysml.org/The_SysML_Modelling_Language.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Heath, S. K., Brailsford, S. C., Buss, A., & Macal, C. M. (2011). Cross-paradigm simulation modeling: challenges and successes. In Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2011 Winter (pp. 2783–2797). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6147983/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Helbing, D. (2010). Quantitative sociodynamics: stochastic methods and models of social interaction processes. Springer Science & Business Media. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hieronymi, A. (2013). Understanding systems science: A visual and integrative approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(5), 580–595. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Holme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012). Temporal networks. Physics Reports, 519(3), 97–125. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Houkes, W., & Zwart, S. D. (2012). Transfer and templates in scientific modeling. Retrieved from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9407 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Huang, C.-C. (2011). Discrete event system modeling using SysML and model transformation. Georgia Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/45830 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Humphreys, P. (1995). Computational science and scientific method. Minds and Machines, 5(4), 499–512. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Humphreys, P. (1997). Computational empiricism. In Topics in the Foundation of Statistics (pp. 119–130). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-8816-4_13 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Humphreys, P. (2002). Computational models. Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), S1–S11. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Humphreys, P. (2009). The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods. Synthese, 169(3), 615–626. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hunter, J. D. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing In Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Jasny, L. (2007). Corporate Interlock. In A. Bejan & G. W. Merkx (Eds.), Constructal Theory of Social Dynamics (pp. 247–262). New York, New York: Springer. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Jovanovski, B., Minovski, R., Voessner, S., & Lichtenegger, G. (2012). Combining system dynamics and discrete event simulations: Overview of hybrid simulation models. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 10(3), 135–142. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Klir, G. J. (2005). Uncertainty and information: foundations of generalized information theory. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Knuuttila, T., & Loettgers, A. (2012). The productive tension: Mechanisms vs. templates in modeling the phenomena. Representations, Models, and Simulations, 2–24. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Knuuttila, T., & Loettgers, A. (2016a). Model templates within and between disciplines: from magnets to gases–and socio-economic systems. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(3), 377–400. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Knuuttila, T., & Loettgers, A. (2016b). Modelling as Indirect Representation? The Lotka–Volterra Model Revisited. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, axv055. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Kwapień, J., & Drożdż, S. (2012). Physical approach to complex systems. Physics Reports, 515(3), 115–226. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Leinfellner, W., & Köhler, E. (1974). Developments in the methodology of social science (Vol. 6). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Levis, A. H. (2009). Simple versus realistic modeling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 15(1), 5. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Lindenberg, S. (1992). The method of decreasing abstraction. Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique, 1, 6. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ljung, L. (1998). System identification. In Signal analysis and prediction (pp. 163–173). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4612-1768-8_11 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ljung, L. (2010a). Approaches to identification of nonlinear systems. In Control Conference (CCC), 2010 29th Chinese (pp. 1–5). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5572936/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ljung, L. (2010b). Perspectives on system identification. Annual Reviews in Control, 34(1), 1–12. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ljung, L., & Glad, T. (1994). Modeling of dynamic systems. Retrieved from http://engineering.ju.edu.jo/ar/Arabic/Lists/Courses/Attachments/105/MX-0908543-Hydraulic%20and%20Pneumatic%20Control-Feb-2014-Spring.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Louie, M. A., & Carley, K. M. (2008). Balancing the criticisms: Validating multi-agent models of social systems. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 16(2), 242–256. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (1999). ’History-friendly’models of industry evolution: the computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 3–40. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Marsden, P. V. (2005). Recent developments in network measurement. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, 8, 30. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Marsili, M., Mastromatteo, I., & Roudi, Y. (2013). On sampling and modeling complex systems. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2013(09), P09003. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Mazher, A. K. (2000). Toward a Unified Approach to Modeling and Computer Simulation of Social Systems. In Workshop on Norms and Institutions in Multi-Agent Systems, 4th International Conferen-Perspektive nove europske jezične politike: Nova višejezičnost i učenje stranih jezika. Retrieved from http://ccs.mit.edu/dell/aa2001/paper1.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Meissner, W., & Wold, N. (1974). The Foundation of Science on Cognitive Mini Models. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the Methodology of Social Science (Vol. 6, pp. 111–146). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Merkx, G. W. (2007). Constructal Models in Social Processes. In A. Bejan & G. W. Merkx (Eds.), Constructal Theory of Social Dynamics (pp. 35–50). New York, New York: Springer. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Mitchell, M. (2011). Complexity: A guided tour. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Murray-Smith, R. (1998). Modelling Human Control Behaviour with Context-Dependent Markov-Switching Multiple Models. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 31(26), 461–466. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | North, M. J. (2014). A theoretical formalism for analyzing agent-based models. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 2(1), 1–34. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Oliver, D. W. (1997). Engineering of complex systems with models. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 33(2), 667–685. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Pabjan, B. (2004). The use of models in sociology. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 336(1), 146–152. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Pidd, M. (1999). Just modeling through: A rough guide to modeling. Interfaces, 29(2), 118–132. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Polhill, J. G., Parker, D., Brown, D., & Grimm, V. (2008). Using the ODD protocol for describing three agent-based social simulation models of land-use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(2), 3. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Popova, V., & Sharpanskykh, A. (2007). A formal framework for modeling and analysis of organizations. In Situational Method Engineering: Fundamentals and Experiences (pp. 343–358). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-73947-2_26 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Rahmandad, H., & Sterman, J. (2008). Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: Comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Management Science, 54(5), 998–1014. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Robinson, S. (2008). Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(3), 278–290. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Robinson, S. (2010). Conceptual modelling: Who needs it. SCS M&S Magazine, 2, 1–7. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sage, A. P., & Thissen, W. A. H. (1980). Methodologies for Systems Modeling. Simulation with Discrete Models: A State-of-the-Art View, TI Oren, CM Shub, PF Roth (Eds.), IEEE, New York, 45–62. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sahlins, M. D. (2002). Waiting for Foucault, still. Prickly Paradigm Press Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.ugr.es/~aalvarez/observadorcultural/Documentos/Sahlins_2002.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sansores, C., & Pavón, J. (2005). Simulación social basada en agentes. Inteligencia Artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial, 9(25). Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/html/925/92592509/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sawyer, R. K. (2004a). Social explanation and computational simulation. Philosophical Explorations, 7(3), 219–231. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sawyer, R. K. (2004b). The mechanisms of emergence. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 260–282. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sayama, H., Pestov, I., Schmidt, J., Bush, B. J., Wong, C., Yamanoi, J., & Gross, T. (2013). Modeling complex systems with adaptive networks. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 65(10), 1645–1664. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sibertin-Blanc, C., Roggero, P., Adreit, F., Baldet, B., Chapron, P., El-Gemayel, J., … Sandri, S. (2013). SocLab: a framework for the modeling, simulation and analysis of power in social organizations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(4), 8. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Simon, H. A. (1991). The architecture of complexity. In Facets of systems science (pp. 457–476). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_31 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Squazzoni, F. (2008). The micro-macro link in social simulation. Sociologica, 2(1), 0–0. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Squazzoni, F. (2012). Agent-based computational sociology. John Wiley & Sons. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sterman, J. D. (2002). All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review, 18(4), 501–531. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sun, R. (2009). Theoretical status of computational cognitive modeling. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 124–140. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Suppe, F. (1974). Theories and phenomena. In W. Leinfellner & E. Köhler (Eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science (Vol. 6, pp. 45–91). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Taleb, N. N. (2016). The bed of Procrustes: philosophical and practical aphorisms. New York, New York: Random House. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | The Object Management Group. (2015a). OMG systems modeling language (OMG SysML) version 1.4. The Object Management Group. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | The Object Management Group. (2015b). OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) versión 2.5. The Object Management Group. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Thompson, N. S., & Derr, P. (2009). Contra Epstein, good explanations predict. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(1), 9. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Tolk, A., Diallo, S. Y., Padilla, J. J., & Gore, R. (2013). Epistemology of Modeling and Simulation: How can we gain Knowledge from Simulations? ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1306.5215. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5215 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Toral, R., & Tessone, C. J. (2006). Finite size effects in the dynamics of opinion formation. ArXiv Preprint Physics/0607252. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0607252 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Troitzsch, K. G. (2009). Perspectives and challenges of agent-based simulation as a tool for economics and other social sciences. In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1 (pp. 35–42). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1558016 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Varenne, F. (2009). Models and Simulations in the Historical Emergence of the Science of Complexity. In From system complexity to emergent properties (pp. 3–21). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02199-2_1 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Viana, J., Brailsford, S. C., Harindra, V., & Harper, P. R. (2014). Combining discrete-event simulation and system dynamics in a healthcare setting: A composite model for Chlamydia infection. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(1), 196–206. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Vogel, M. P. (2009). Understanding Emergent Social Phenomena Comparatively: The Need for Computational Simulation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 84–92. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Von Bertalanffy, L., & Sutherland, J. W. (1974). General systems theory: Foundations, developments, applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 4(6), 592–592. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Warfield, J. N. (1999). Twenty laws of complexity: Science applicable in organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(1), 3. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Warfield, J. N. (2003). A proposal for systems science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 20(6), 507–520. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge university press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Weaver, W. (1991). Science and complexity. In Facets of Systems Science (pp. 449–456). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_30 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Whitmeyer, J. M., Khouja, M., Carmichael, T., Saric, A., Eichelberger, C., Sun, M., & Hadzikadic, M. (2008). A Computer Simulation Laboratory for Social Theories. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 2008. WI-IAT’08. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 512–515). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4740676/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Wu, H.-C., & Sun, C.-T. (2005). What should we do before running a social simulation? The importance of model analysis. Social Science Computer Review, 23(2), 221–234. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Yang, L., & Gilbert, N. (2008). Getting away from numbers: Using qualitative observation for agent-based modeling. Advances in Complex Systems, 11(02), 175–185. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Zeigler, B. P., Praehofer, H., & Kim, T. G. (2000). Theory of modeling and simulation: integrating discrete event and continuous complex dynamic systems (2nd ed.). San Diego, California.: Academic press. | spa |
| dc.rights | Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
| dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional | spa |
| dc.rights.spa | Acceso abierto | spa |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | spa |
| dc.subject.ddc | 000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::003 - Sistemas | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Modelling and Simulation | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Modelado y simulación | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Sistemas sociales | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Social Systems | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Computational templates | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Plantillas computacionales | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | SysML | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | SysML | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | DEVS | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | DEVS | spa |
| dc.title | Towards a framework building for social systems modelling | spa |
| dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Doctorado | spa |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 | spa |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | spa |
| dc.type.content | Text | spa |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis | spa |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | spa |
| oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- 71628723.2017.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 2.15 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería - Sistemas
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 3.9 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción:

