Barreras e impulsores de la construcción sostenible en Colombia. Un enfoque en Análisis de Ciclo de Vida (ACV) y desde Estrategias Organizaciones (EO)

dc.contributor.advisorRomero Larrahondo, Paulo Andrésspa
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Murcia, Susan Liliana
dc.contributor.researchgroupInnovación en producto y construcción sosteniblespa
dc.coverage.countryColombiaspa
dc.coverage.tgnhttp://vocab.getty.edu/page/tgn/1000050
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T17:54:36Z
dc.date.available2021-10-14T17:54:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-10
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramasspa
dc.description.abstractEsta investigación exploró el fenómeno de la construcción sostenible en Colombia desde un diseño de investigación cualitativo, con un enfoque en los conceptos Análisis de Ciclo de Vida (ACV) y Estrategias Organizacionales (EO). Con el objetivo de reconocer cómo se puede promover la construcción sostenible en Colombia, a través de la de identificación de barreras, impulsores, herramientas, estrategias y tendencias de la construcción sostenible, basados en la teoría y la experiencia de las partes interesadas del sector. Su desarrollo metodológico se dividió en tres fases, la primera se realizó por medio de una Revisión Sistemática de Literatura (RSL), la segunda fase se desarrolló a partir de una encuesta de percepción de los temas asociados con la construcción sostenible a las partes interesadas de la cadena de valor en Colombia y la tercera es un reporte final que integra los resultados de las dos primeras dos fases. Los resultados obtenidos reflejan un creciente interés por la integración de la sostenibilidad tanto en la literatura científica como en la percepción y comportamiento de las partes interesadas (Araújo, Pereira Carneiro, & Palha, 2020; Bocken, Short, Rana, & Evans, 2014; Zemigala, 2019). El estudio de las barreras e impulsores de la construcción sostenible permitió comprender los factores determinantes para la generación de estrategias para desarrollar mejores prácticas en la industria con miras al Triple Resultado Final (TRF) y los enfoques en ACV y EO permitieron ahondar en la gestión de la construcción sostenible desde la visión de la gestión ambiental y empresarial, evidenciando implicaciones teórico - prácticas para el sector (Elkington, 1994; Goel et al., 2019; Matar et al., 2008). Este estudio marca una pauta para el desarrollo de futuras investigaciones en este campo, así mismo los resultados acerca de las tendencias a nivel teórico y empírico pueden ser de utilidad para las partes interesadas del sector. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractThis research explored the phenomenon of sustainable construction in Colombia from a qualitative research design, with a focus on the concepts of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Organizational Strategies (OS). With the aim of recognizing how sustainable construction can be promoted in Colombia, through the identification of barriers, drivers, tools, strategies and trends of sustainable construction, based on the theory and experience of the stakeholders in the sector. Its methodological development was divided into three phases, the first was carried out through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), the second phase was developed from a perception survey of the issues associated with sustainable construction for the stakeholders of the value chain in Colombia and the third is a final report that integrates the results of the first two phases. The results obtained reflect a growing interest in the integration of sustainability both in the scientific literature and in the perception and behavior of interested parties (Araújo, Pereira Carneiro, & Palha, 2020; Bocken, Short, Rana, & Evans, 2014; Zemigala, 2019). The study of the barriers and drivers of sustainable construction allowed understanding the determining factors for the generation of strategies to develop best practices in the industry with a view to the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) and the approaches in LCA and OS allowed to delve into the management of sustainable construction from the vision of environmental and business management, showing theoretical and practical implications for the sector (Elkington, 1994; Goel et al., 2019; Matar et al., 2008).eng
dc.description.curricularareaArquitectura y Urbanismospa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Construcciónspa
dc.description.researchareaConstrucción sosteniblespa
dc.format.extentxv, 242 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80551
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Artesspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Artes - Maestría en Construcciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAarseth, W., Ahola, T., Aaltonen, K., Økland, A., & Andersen, B. (2017). Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006spa
dc.relation.referencesAbdallah, T. (2017). Environmental Impacts. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811299-1.00004-6spa
dc.relation.referencesAbidin, N. Z. (2010). Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers. Habitat International, 34(4), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.011spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2006a). UNE - EN 14040 Gestión ambiental. Análisis de ciclo de vida. Principios y marco de referencia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2006b). UNE - EN 14044 Gestión ambiental. Análisis de ciclo de vida. Requisitos y directrices. Requisitos del ciclo de vida.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2010). UNE-EN14025 Etiquetas y declaraciones ambientales. Declaraciones ambientales tipo III. Principios y procedimientos.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2012a). UNE - EN 15643-2 Sostenibilidad en la construcción. Parte 2: Marco para la evaluación del comportamiento ambiental.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2012b). UNE - EN 15978 Sostenibilidad en la construcción. Evaluación del comportamiento ambiental de los edificios. Métodos de cálculo.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2012c). UNE - EN 21930 Sustainability in building construction - Environmental declaration of building products.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2013). UNE - EN 15942 Sostenibilidad en la construcción. Declaraciones ambientales de producto. Formato de comunicación negocio a negocio.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2014). UNE - EN 15804 Sostenibilidad en la construcción. Declaraciones ambientales de producto. Reglas de categoría de productos básicas para productos de construcción.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2018a). 15643-5 Norma Española Sostenibilidad en la construcción Evaluación de la sostenibilidad de los edificios y las obras de ingeniería civil Parte 5 : Marco de principios específicos y requisitos para las obras de ingeniería civil.spa
dc.relation.referencesAENOR. (2018b). UNE- EN 14027 Etiquetas y declaraciones ambientales. Desarrollo de reglas de categoría de producto.spa
dc.relation.referencesAfzal, F., Lim, B., & Prasad, D. (2017). An Investigation of Corporate Approaches to Sustainability in the Construction Industry. Procedia Engineering, 180, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.179spa
dc.relation.referencesAigbavboa, C., Ohiomah, I., & Zwane, T. (2017). Sustainable Construction Practices: “a Lazy View” of Construction Professionals in the South Africa Construction Industry. Energy Procedia, 105, 3003–3010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.743spa
dc.relation.referencesAlcaldia Mayor de Bogotá. (2014). Decreto 566 de 2014. 1(Diciembre 16), 1–13.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlcaldia Mayor de Bogotá. (2015). Decreto 613 de 2015. 1–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesAli, H. H., & Alkayed, A. A. (2019). Constrains and barriers of implementing sustainability into architectural professional practice in Jordan. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(3), 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.09.003spa
dc.relation.referencesAlsanad, S. (2015). Awareness , Drivers , Actions , and Barriers of Sustainable Construction in Kuwait. 118, 969–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.538spa
dc.relation.referencesAlsubeh, M. A. (2013). A strategic framework for sustainable construction in Jordan. 3(2), 102–108.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmetepey, O., Aigbavboa, C., & Ansah, K. (2015). Barriers to successful implementation of sustainable construction in the Ghanaian construction industry. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 1682–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.988spa
dc.relation.referencesAmui, L. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Kannan, D. (2017). Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103spa
dc.relation.referencesAnand, C. K., & Amor, B. (2017). Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.058spa
dc.relation.referencesAndrew Booth, Anthea Sutton, D. P. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=JD1DCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=IYoJGZbS2A&sig=Q4I_kGnl2xJFtciG5Gja4j2aCTw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=falsespa
dc.relation.referencesAntink, R., Garrigan, C., Bonetti, M., & Westaway, R. (2014). Greening the Building Supply Chain. UNEP Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative. United Nations Environment Programme. Job Number: DTI/1753/PA. 86. http://staging.unep.org/sbci/spa
dc.relation.referencesAragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022spa
dc.relation.referencesAraújo, A. G., Pereira Carneiro, A. M., & Palha, R. P. (2020). Sustainable construction management: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120350spa
dc.relation.referencesAsamblea Nacional Constituyente. (1991). Constitución Política de Colombia 1991.spa
dc.relation.referencesAtafo, M., Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., Osei-kyei, R., Abidoye, R., & Adjei-kumi, T. (2020). Critical barriers to sustainability attainment in affordable housing : International construction professionals ’ perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119995spa
dc.relation.referencesAtehortúa, D. A. H. (2017). Aproximación a un Modelo Green Lean integrando el Análisis de Ciclo de Vida (ACV) con el Value Stream Mapping (VSM): Estudio de caso sector construcción. UNAL. http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/58653/spa
dc.relation.referencesBamgbade, J. A., Kamaruddeen, A. M., Nawi, M. N. M., Adeleke, A. Q., Salimon, M. G., & Ajibike, W. A. (2019). Analysis of some factors driving ecological sustainability in construction firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1537–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.229spa
dc.relation.referencesBamgbade, J. A., Nawi, M. N. M., Kamaruddeen, A. M., Adeleke, A. Q., & Salimon, M. G. (2019). Building sustainability in the construction industry though firm capabilities, technology and business innovativeness: empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Construction Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1634666spa
dc.relation.referencesBamgbade, J A, Kamaruddeen, A. M., & Nawi, M. N. M. (2017). Towards environmental sustainability adoption in construction fi rms : An empirical analysis of market orientation and organizational innovativeness impacts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32(November 2016), 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.015spa
dc.relation.referencesBamgbade, Jibril Adewale, Kamaruddeen, A. M., Nasrun, M., Nawi, M., Yusoff, R. Z., & Bin, R. A. (2018). Does government support matter ? Influence of organizational culture on sustainable construction among Malaysian contractors. 3599. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1277057spa
dc.relation.referencesBanihashemi, S., Hosseini, M. R., Golizadeh, H., & Sankaran, S. (2017). Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.014spa
dc.relation.referencesBarletta, I., Berlin, C., Despeisse, M., Van Voorthuysen, E., & Johansson, B. (2018). A Methodology to Align Core Manufacturing Capabilities with Sustainable Manufacturing Strategies. Procedia CIRP, 69(May), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.102spa
dc.relation.referencesBarney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108spa
dc.relation.referencesBartocci, L., Amui, L., Jose, C., Jabbour, C., Beatriz, A., Sousa, L. De, & Kannan, D. (2017). Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability : a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103spa
dc.relation.referencesBilal, M., Oyedele, L. O., Qadir, J., Munir, K., Ajayi, S. O., Akinade, O. O., Owolabi, H. A., Alaka, H. A., & Pasha, M. (2016). Big Data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(3), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001spa
dc.relation.referencesBohari, A. A. M., Skitmore, M., Xia, B., Teo, M., & Khalil, N. (2020). Key stakeholder values in encouraging green orientation of construction procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122246spa
dc.relation.referencesBossink, B. (2020). Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects : What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 131(March), 110025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110025spa
dc.relation.referencesBourdeau, L. (1999). Sustainable development and the future of construction: A comparison of visions from various countries. Building Research and Information, 27(6), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132199369183spa
dc.relation.referencesBribi, I. Z., Us, A. A., & Mostrar, S. S. (2009). Evaluación del ciclo de vida en edificios : metodología LCA avanzada y simplificada como complemento para la certificación de edificios.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development : Note by the Secretary-General. In Oxford paperbacks (Issue A/42/427, p. 400). https://doi.org/10.2307/633499spa
dc.relation.referencesBuyle, M., Braet, J., & Audenaert, A. (2013). Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.001spa
dc.relation.referencesCabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014). Life cycle assessment ( LCA ) and life cycle energy analysis ( LCEA ) of buildings and the building sector : A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 394–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037spa
dc.relation.referencesCAMACOL. (2018). Construcción sostenible informe 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesCAMACOL. (2019). Informe de gestión 2018 -2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesCardona, M. A. (2020). La actualidad del sector retail en la construcción sostenible de Colombia. Green Business Certification Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarneiro, P., Jerónimo, A., Silva, V., Cartaxo, F., & Faria, P. (2016). Improving Building Technologies with a Sustainable Strategy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216(October 2015), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.080spa
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, J. P., Bragança, L., & Mateus, R. (2019). Optimising building sustainability assessment using BIM. In Automation in Construction (Vol. 102, pp. 170–182). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.021spa
dc.relation.referencesCCCS. (2018a). InTEGRA - Edición Especial 10 Años del CCCS por el Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible. https://issuu.com/integra-cccs/docs/integra_marzo_2018_issuespa
dc.relation.referencesCCCS. (2018b). inTEGRA - Segunda Edición by Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible - issuu. https://issuu.com/integra-cccs/docs/arte_integra_2_issuuspa
dc.relation.referencesCCCS. (2019). inTEGRA - Tercera Edición by Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible - issuu. https://issuu.com/integra-cccs/docs/issuu_integra_iiispa
dc.relation.referencesCCCS. (2020). inTEGRA Quinta Edición by Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible - issuu. https://issuu.com/integra-cccs/docs/integra_vspa
dc.relation.referencesChang, R., Soebarto, V., Zhao, Z., & Zillante, G. (2016). Facilitating the transition to sustainable construction : China ’ s policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.147spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, P. H., Ong, C. F., & Hsu, S. C. (2016). The linkages between internationalization and environmental strategies of multinational construction firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.105spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, W., Jin, R., Xu, Y., Wanatowski, D., Li, B., Yan, L., Pan, Z., & Yang, Y. (2019). Adopting recycled aggregates as sustainable construction materials: A review of the scientific literature. Construction and Building Materials, 218, 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.130spa
dc.relation.referencesChew, K. C. (2010). Singapore’s strategies towards sustainable construction. IES Journal Part A: Civil and Structural Engineering, 3(3), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/19373260.2010.491641spa
dc.relation.referencesChong, H. Y., Lee, C. Y., & Wang, X. (2017). A mixed review of the adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4114–4126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.222spa
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. (2019). Plan nacional de desarrollo 2018-2022. “Pacto por Colombia, pacto por la equidad.”spa
dc.relation.referencesConsejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible, Camara Colombiana de la construcción, I. F. C. (2020). Conceptos basicos de sostenibilidad.spa
dc.relation.referencesConsejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social [CONPES 3874]. (2018). CONPES 3874-Politica Nacional Para La Gestión Integral De Residuos Solidos. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 73. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/3874.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesConsejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social [CONPES 3918]. (2018). CONPES 3918 Estrategia para la implementacion de los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS) en Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesConsejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social [CONPES 3919]. (2018). CONPES 3919 Política Nacional de Edificaciones Sostenibles.spa
dc.relation.referencesConsejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social [CONPES 3934]. (2018). CONPES 3934 Política de Crecimiento Verde. 114. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/3934.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. (2012). Educational research (Fourth edi). Pearson.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method. In Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2spa
dc.relation.referencesCui, X. (2018). How can cities support sustainability : A bibliometric analysis of urban metabolism. Ecological Indicators, 93(May), 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.056spa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2020). Boletin déficit habitacional.spa
dc.relation.referencesDarko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Adabre, M. A., Edwards, D. J., Hosseini, M. R., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the AEC industry: Scientometric analysis and visualization of research activities. Automation in Construction, 112(January), 103081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103081spa
dc.relation.referencesDarko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Huo, X., Estate, R., Hong, T., Polytechnic, K., Hom, H., & Kong, H. (2019). A scientometric analysis and visualization of global green building research. Building and Environment, 149(December 2018), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.059spa
dc.relation.referencesDarko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Owusu-manu, D., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2017). Drivers for implementing green building technologies : An international survey of experts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.043spa
dc.relation.referencesDarko, A., Ping, A., Chan, C., Yang, Y., Shan, M., & He, B. (2018). In fl uences of barriers , drivers , and promotion strategies on green building technologies adoption in developing countries : The Ghanaian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 200, 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.318spa
dc.relation.referencesDarko, A., Zhang, C., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Drivers for green building : A review of empirical studies. Habitat International, 60, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.12.007spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Oliveira, E. C., & Gognat, L. (2017). Multi-criteria assessment of sustainable envelop strategies’ performances. Energy Procedia, 122, 703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.373spa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística - DANE. (2019). Indicadores Económicos Alrededor de la Construcción (IEAC). Boletín Técnico, Educación Formal 2014, 1–44. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/pib_const/Bol_ieac_IVtrim18.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento de Planeación Distrital. (2019). Resolución 1874. Letras, no. 7(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Nacional de Planeación, R. de colombia. (2018). Documento CONPES 3919. Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social, 98. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPA.1999.815782spa
dc.relation.referencesDet, A., & Hallinger, P. (2020). A bibliometric review of research on sustainable construction , 1994 e 2018. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120073spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-lópez, C., Carpio, M., & Martín-morales, M. (2019). Analysis of the scienti fi c evolution of sustainable building assessment methods. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49(May), 101610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101610spa
dc.relation.referencesDing, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction-The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025spa
dc.relation.referencesDjokoto, S. D., Dadzie, J., & Ohemeng-Ababio, E. (2014). Barriers to sustainable construction in the ghanaian construction industry: Consultants perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v7n1p134spa
dc.relation.referencesDodge Data & Analytics. (2018). World Green Building Trends 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-94spa
dc.relation.referencesDu plessis, C. (2002). Agenda 21 on sustainable construction in developing countries. CIB (International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction)., 120. https://doi.org/90-6363-015-8spa
dc.relation.referencesDu plessis, C. (2007). A strategic framework for sustainable construction in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics, 25(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600601313spa
dc.relation.referencesDurdyev, S., Ismail, S., Ihtiyar, A., Fatin, N., Abu, S., & Darko, A. (2018). A partial least squares structural equation modeling ( PLS-SEM ) of barriers to sustainable construction in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.304spa
dc.relation.referencesElkington, J. (1994). Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746spa
dc.relation.referencesElkington, J. (2004). Enter the Triple Bottom Line.spa
dc.relation.referencesEsa, M. R., Halog, A., & Rigamonti, L. (2017). Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.014spa
dc.relation.referencesEtzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302553spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability. (2010). ILCD Handbook: Review schemes for Life Cycle Assessment. In European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2788/39791spa
dc.relation.referencesFaiz, A., Rashid, A., & Yusoff, S. (2015). A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.043spa
dc.relation.referencesFink, A. (2019). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=0z1_DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=14OphZWTaB&sig=RzDwfz4h7WTlfo4jiSnHcFyoPw4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=falsespa
dc.relation.referencesForsberg, A., & Malmborg, F. Von. (2004). Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment. Building and Environment, 39, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.004spa
dc.relation.referencesFoster, G. (2020a). Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152(October 2019), 104507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507spa
dc.relation.referencesFoster, G. (2020b). Resources , Conservation & Recycling Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 152(October 2019), 104507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507spa
dc.relation.referencesGan, X., Zuo, J., Ye, K., Skitmore, M., & Xiong, B. (2015). Why sustainable construction ? Why not ? An owner ’ s perspective. Habitat International, 47, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.005spa
dc.relation.referencesGbadebo, M., & Ajibike, W. A. (2019). Analysis of some factors driving ecological sustainability in construction fi rms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1537–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.229spa
dc.relation.referencesGeng, S., Wang, Y., Zuo, J., Zhou, Z., Du, H., & Mao, G. (2017). Building life cycle assessment research : A review by bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76(October 2015), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.068spa
dc.relation.referencesspa
dc.relation.referencesGhaffar, S. H., Burman, M., & Braimah, N. (2020). Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118710spa
dc.relation.referencesGhodrati, N., Yiu, T. W., & Wilkinson, S. (2018). Unintended consequences of management strategies for improving labor productivity in construction industry. Journal of Safety Research, 67, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.001spa
dc.relation.referencesGlavi, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. 15, 1875–1885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006spa
dc.relation.referencesGoel, A., Ganesh, L. S., & Kaur, A. (2019). Sustainability integration in the management of construction projects : A morphological analysis of over two decades ’ research literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117676spa
dc.relation.referencesGolpîra, H. (2020). Optimal integration of the facility location problem into the multi-project multi-supplier multi-resource Construction Supply Chain network design under the vendor managed inventory strategy. Expert Systems with Applications, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112841spa
dc.relation.referencesGomez-Jauregui, V., Manchado, C., Del-Castillo-Igareda, J., & Otero, C. (2019). Quantitative evaluation of overlaying discrepancies in mobile augmented reality applications for AEC/FM. Advances in Engineering Software, 127(September 2018), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.11.002spa
dc.relation.referencesGopanagoni, V., & Velpula, S. L. (2020). Proceedings An analytical approach on life cycle cost analysis of a green building. Materials Today: Proceedings, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.226spa
dc.relation.referencesHäkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and drivers for sustainable building Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. 3218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.561948spa
dc.relation.referencesHamzeh, F., Al Hattab, M., Rizk, L., El Samad, G., & Emdanat, S. (2019). Developing new metrics to evaluate the performance of capacity planning towards sustainable construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.021spa
dc.relation.referencesHan, S. H., Kim, D. Y., Jang, H. S., & Choi, S. (2010). Strategies for contractors to sustain growth in the global construction market. Habitat International, 34(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.04.003spa
dc.relation.referencesHart, S. L. (1995). A Natural Resource Based View of the Firm. 20(4), 986–1014.spa
dc.relation.referencesHart, S. L. (2011). The Third-Generation Corporation.spa
dc.relation.referencesHart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219spa
dc.relation.referencesHart, S. L., & Johnson. (2010). Praise for Capitalism at the Crossroads. http://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780136134398/samplepages/0136134394.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHart, S. L., Milstein, M. B., & Caggiano, J. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–69.spa
dc.relation.referencesHazarika, N., & Zhang, X. (2019). Factors that drive and sustain eco-innovation in the construction industry : The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117816spa
dc.relation.referencesHe, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, G., Zuo, J., Wu, G., & Liu, B. (2020). To be green or not to be: How environmental regulations shape contractor greenwashing behaviors in construction projects. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63(August), 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102462spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004spa
dc.relation.referencesHill, R. C., Bowen, P. A., Hill, R. C., & Bowen, P. A. (1997). Sustainable construction : principles and a framework for attainment Sustainable construction : principles and a framework for attainment. 6193. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372971spa
dc.relation.referencesHong, T., Koo, C., Kim, J., Lee, M., & Jeong, K. (2015). A review on sustainable construction management strategies for monitoring , diagnosing , and retrofitting the building ’ s dynamic energy performance : Focused on the operation and maintenance phase. 155, 671–707.spa
dc.relation.referencesHossain, M. U., & Ng, S. T. (2020). Strategies for enhancing the accuracy of evaluation and sustainability performance of building. Journal of Environmental Management, 261(September 2019), 110230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110230spa
dc.relation.referencesHossain, U., Ng, S. T., Antwi-afari, P., & Amor, B. (2020). Circular economy and the construction industry : Existing trends , challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. 130(May).spa
dc.relation.referencesHussain, K., He, Z., Ahmad, N., & Muhammad, S. (2019). Green , lean , Six Sigma barriers at a glance : A case from the construction sector of Pakistan. 161(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106225spa
dc.relation.referencesHuzaimi, A., Jamil, A., & Syazli, M. (2016). The Integration of Lean Construction and Sustainable Construction : A Stakeholder Perspective in Analyzing Sustainable Lean Construction Strategies in Malaysia. Procedia - Procedia Computer Science, 100, 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.205spa
dc.relation.referencesIDEAM. (2016). Gases de Efecto Invernadero en Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesIdris, N. H., & Ismail, Z. (2011). Framework policy for sustainable construction in Malaysia. ISBEIA 2011 - 2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088855spa
dc.relation.referencesIgnacio Zabalza, A. A., Scarpellini, S., & Bribia. (2009). Life cycle assessment in buildings : State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. 44, 2510–2520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001spa
dc.relation.referencesIHOBE. (2010). Green Building Rating Systems: ¿Cómo evaluar la sostenibilidad en la edificación? Ihobe, 1a Edición, 72.spa
dc.relation.referencesIngrao, C., Messineo, A., Beltramo, R., Yigitcanlar, T., & Ioppolo, G. (2018). How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings ? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy ef fi ciency and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.080spa
dc.relation.referencesInigo, E. A., & Albareda, L. (2019). Sustainability oriented innovation dynamics: Levels of dynamic capabilities and their path-dependent and self-reinforcing logics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139(March 2018), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.023spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC). (2007). ISO 14040 Gestión ambiental. Análisis de ciclo de vida. Principios y marco de referencia. ICONTEC, 571, 1–24. http://files.control-ambiental5.webnode.com.co/200000127-a0991a28c5/NTC-ISO14040-2007 Analisis_CicloVida.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC). (2015). NTC-ISO 14001 Sistemas de gestión ambiental. Requisitos con orientación para su uso. ICONTEC, 571, 55. https://informacion.unad.edu.co/images/control_interno/NTC_ISO_14001_2015.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesInvidiata, A., Lavagna, M., & Ghisi, E. (2018). Selecting design strategies using multi-criteria decision making to improve the sustainability of buildings. Building and Environment, 139(April), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.041spa
dc.relation.referencesIPCC. (2014). Cambio climático, informe de síntesis.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsmail, Z., Idris, N. H., & Nasir, N. M. (2012a). Comparative analysis on the policies in promoting sustainable construction in developed Asian countries. ISBEIA 2012 - IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBEIA.2012.6422969spa
dc.relation.referencesIsmail, Z., Idris, N. H., & Nasir, N. M. (2012b). Sustainable initiative and impediments towards promoting sustainable construction in Malaysia. CHUSER 2012 - 2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, Chuser, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504276spa
dc.relation.referencesJørgensen, S. E. (2000). Environmental Management by Changes in Products and Production Methods. Principles of Pollution Abatement, 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043626-5/50009-4spa
dc.relation.referencesKabirifar, K., Mojtahedi, M., Wang, C., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2020). Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121265spa
dc.relation.referencesKamaruddeen, A. M., Adeleke, A. Q., Salimon, G., & Ajibike, W. A. (2018). Análisis de algunos factores que impulsan la sostenibilidad ecológica en empresas de.spa
dc.relation.referencesKatiyar, R., Meena, P. L., Barua, M. K., Tibrewala, R., & Kumar, G. (2018). Impact of sustainability and manufacturing practices on supply chain performance: Findings from an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.007spa
dc.relation.referencesKein, A. T. T., Ofori, G., & Briffett, C. (1999). ISO 14000: Its relevance to the construction industry of Singapore and its potential as the next industry milestone. Construction Management and Economics, 17(4), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371376spa
dc.relation.referencesKibert, C. J. (2007). The next generation of sustainable construction. Building Research and Information, 35(6), 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701467040spa
dc.relation.referencesKibwami, N., & Tutesigensi, A. (2016). Enhancing sustainable construction in the building sector in Uganda. Habitat International, 57, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.011spa
dc.relation.referencesKissi, E., Abdulai Sadick, M., & Agyemang, D. Y. (2018). Drivers militating against the pricing of sustainable construction materials: The Ghanaian quantity surveyors perspective. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 8, 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.04.003spa
dc.relation.referencesKlewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017spa
dc.relation.referencesKorhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy : The Concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041spa
dc.relation.referencesKrausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K., Haberl, H., & Fischer-kowalski, M. (2009). Growth in global materials use , GDP and population during the 20th century. 68, 2696–2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007spa
dc.relation.referencesKudratova, S., Huang, X., & Zhou, X. (2018). Sustainable project selection : Optimal project selection considering sustainability under reinvestment strategy. 203, 469–481.spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology.spa
dc.relation.referencesKwiatek, C., Sharif, M., Li, S., Haas, C., & Walbridge, S. (2019). Impact of augmented reality and spatial cognition on assembly in construction. Automation in Construction, 108(November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102935spa
dc.relation.referencesKylili, A., & Fokaides, P. A. (2017). Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials : A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35(April), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013spa
dc.relation.referencesLabonnote, N., Skaar, C., & Rüther, P. (2017). The Potential of Decision Support Systems for More Sustainable and Intelligent Constructions: A Short Overview. Procedia Manufacturing, 12(2351), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.006spa
dc.relation.referencesLabuschagne, C., & Brent, A. C. (2005). Sustainable Project Life Cycle Management: The need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Project Management, 23(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.003spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, H., Zhang, X., Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, M. (2018). Quantifying stakeholder influence in decision/evaluations relating to sustainable construction in China – A Delphi approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.151spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, L., Li, Z., Li, X., Zhang, S., & Luo, X. (2020). A new framework of industrialized construction in China: Towards on-site industrialization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118469spa
dc.relation.referencesLin, X., McKenna, B., Ho, C. M. F., & Shen, G. Q. P. (2019). Stakeholders’ influence strategies on social responsibility implementation in construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.253spa
dc.relation.referencesLu, Y., Le, V. H., & Song, X. (2017). Beyond Boundaries: A Global Use of Life Cycle Inventories for Construction Materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 876–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.010spa
dc.relation.referencesLu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2016). Corporate sustainability for architecture engineering and construction ( AEC ) organizations : Framework , transition and implication strategies. Ecological Indicators, 61, 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.046spa
dc.relation.referencesLuiz, G., Benachio, F., Duarte, C., & Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry : A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046spa
dc.relation.referencesMagnin, A. (2014). Triple resultado (3 pilares): sostenibilidad en los negocios - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f5m-jBf81Q&t=185s&ab_channel=SustainabilityIllustratedspa
dc.relation.referencesMajdalani, Z., Ajam, M., & Mezher, T. (2006). Sustainability in the construction industry: A Lebanese case study. Construction Innovation, 6(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170610710613spa
dc.relation.referencesMalmqvist, T., Nehasilova, M., Moncaster, A., Birgisdottir, H., Nygaard Rasmussen, F., Houlihan Wiberg, A., & Potting, J. (2018). Design and construction strategies for reducing embodied impacts from buildings – Case study analysis. Energy and Buildings, 166, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.033spa
dc.relation.referencesMartek, I., Hosseini, M. R., Shrestha, A., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Barriers inhibiting the transition to sustainability within the Australian construction industry : An investigation of technical and social interactions. 211(2019).spa
dc.relation.referencesMartens, Mauro L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2017). Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers’ perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004spa
dc.relation.referencesMartens, Mauro Luiz, & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). The challenge of introducing sustainability into project management function: Multiple-case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.039spa
dc.relation.referencesMatar, M. M., Georgy, M. E., & Ibrahim, M. E. (2008). Sustainable construction management: Introduction of the operational context space (OCS). Construction Management and Economics, 26(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701842972spa
dc.relation.referencesMatinaro, V., & Liu, Y. (2017). Towards increased innovativeness and sustainability through organizational culture: A case study of a Finnish construction business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3184–3193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.151spa
dc.relation.referencesMcDonough, W; Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio De Ambiente y desarrollo sostenible; Ministerio de Comercio Industria y Turismo. (2019). Estrategia Nacional de Economía Circular.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. (2016). El acuerdo de parís, así actuará colombia frente al cambio climático.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de vivienda ciudad y territorio. (2014). Plan de Acción Sectorial (PAS) de Mitigación de Gases Efecto Invernadero (GEI): Sector Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. 7.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de vivienda ciudad y territorio. (2015). Resolución No. 0549 de 2015. In Ministerio de Vivienda Ciudad y Territorio (p. 9).spa
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro, P. J. M., Miller, S. A., & Horvath, A. (2017). Towards sustainable concrete. Nature Materials, 16(7), 698–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4930spa
dc.relation.referencesMoore, S. B., & Manring, S. L. (2009). Strategy development in small and medium sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.004spa
dc.relation.referencesMousa, A. (2015). A Business approach for transformation to sustainable construction: An implementation on a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.007spa
dc.relation.referencesMousavi, S., Bossink, B., & van Vliet, M. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.215spa
dc.relation.referencesMurtagh, N., Scott, L., & Fan, J. (2020). Sustainable and resilient construction : Current status and future challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122264spa
dc.relation.referencesNazirah Zainul Abidin. (2010). Sustainable Construction in Malaysia – Developers ’ Awareness. Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 122–129.spa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE, E. (2006). Manual de Oslo. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065659-esspa
dc.relation.referencesOfori, G. (1998). Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment - Comment. Construction Management and Economics, 16(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461998372448spa
dc.relation.referencesOfori, G. (2007). Guest editorial: Construction in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics, 25(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190601114134spa
dc.relation.referencesOgunbiyi, O., Oladapo, A., & Goulding, J. (2014). An empirical study of the impact of lean construction techniques on sustainable construction in the UK. Construction Innovation, 14(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-08-2012-0045spa
dc.relation.referencesOgunsanya, O. A., Aigbavboa, C. O., Thwala, D. W., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Barriers to sustainable procurement in the Nigerian construction industry : an exploratory factor analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1658697spa
dc.relation.referencesOke, A., Aghimien, D., Aigbavboa, C., & Musenga, C. (2019). Drivers of sustainable construction practices in the Zambian construction industry. Energy Procedia, 158, 3246–3252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.995spa
dc.relation.referencesOlawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2018). A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162spa
dc.relation.referencesOlawumi, T. O., Chan, D. W. M., Wong, J. K. W., & Chan, A. P. C. (2018). Barriers to the integration of BIM and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey of international experts. Journal of Building Engineering, 20(July), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.017spa
dc.relation.referencesONU. (2016). Nueva agenda urbana.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrji, I. J., & Liu, S. (2020). A dynamic perspective on the key drivers of innovation-led lean approaches to achieve sustainability in manufacturing supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 219(August), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.002spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2009). Sustainability in the construction industry : A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2010). Life cycle assessment of two dwellings: One in Spain, a developed country, and one in Colombia, a country under development. Science of the Total Environment, 408(12), 2435–2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.021spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz, O., Pasqualino, J. C., Díez, G., & Castells, F. (2010). The environmental impact of the construction phase: An application to composite walls from a life cycle perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(11), 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.01.002spa
dc.relation.referencesPatnaik, J., & Bhowmick, B. (2019). Revisiting appropriate technology with changing socio-technical landscape in emerging countries. Technology in Society, 57(March 2017), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.11.004spa
dc.relation.referencesPetit-Boix, A., Llorach-Massana, P., Sanjuan-Delmás, D., Sierra-Pérez, J., Vinyes, E., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall, J., & Sanyé-Mengual, E. (2017). Application of life cycle thinking towards sustainable cities: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.030spa
dc.relation.referencesPham, H., & Kim, S. (2019). The effects of sustainable practices and managers ’ leadership competences on sustainability performance of construction firms. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, R., Troup, L., Fannon, D., & Eckelman, M. J. (2017). Do resilient and sustainable design strategies conflict in commercial buildings? A critical analysis of existing resilient building frameworks and their sustainability implications. Energy and Buildings, 146, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.009spa
dc.relation.referencesPieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036spa
dc.relation.referencesPing, A., Chan, C., Darko, A., Olubunmi, A., & Effah, E. (2018). Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries : The case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.235spa
dc.relation.referencesPNUMA. (2014). La situación demográfica en el mundo 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesPocock, J., Steckler, C., & Hanzalova, B. (2016). Improving Socially Sustainable Design and Construction in Developing Countries. Procedia Engineering, 145, 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.076spa
dc.relation.referencesPorter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Estrategia y sociedad Estrategia y sociedad.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorter, M., E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorter, M., E. (1996). What Is Strategy.spa
dc.relation.referencesProgramme, U. N. E. (2015). Guidance on Organizational L ife Cycle Assessment.spa
dc.relation.referencesQi, G. Y., Shen, L. Y., Zeng, S. X., & Jorge, O. J. (2010). The drivers for contractors ’ green innovation : an industry perspective. 18, 1358–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.017spa
dc.relation.referencesRamesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007spa
dc.relation.referencesRohden, A. B., & Garcez, M. R. (2018). Increasing the sustainability potential of a reinforced concrete building through design strategies: Case study. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00174spa
dc.relation.referencesRoy, S., Das, M., Ali, S. M., Raihan, A. S., Paul, S. K., & Kabir, G. (2020). Evaluating strategies for environmental sustainability in a supply chain of an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121389spa
dc.relation.referencesRuparathna, R., & Hewage, K. (2015). Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry : current practices , drivers and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.007spa
dc.relation.referencesRuschi, M., Saade, M., Guest, G., & Amor, B. (2020). Comparative whole building LCAs : How far are our expectations from the documented evidence ? Building and Environment, 167(June 2019), 106449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106449spa
dc.relation.referencesSaleh, M. S., & Alalouch, C. (2015). Towards sustainable construction in Oman : Challenges & Opportunities. 118, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.416spa
dc.relation.referencesSamari, M., Godrati, N., Esmaeilifar, R., Olfat, P., & Shafiei, M. W. M. (2013). The investigation of the barriers in developing green building in Malaysia. Modern Applied Science, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v7n2p1spa
dc.relation.referencesSecretaría Distrital de Ambientespa
dc.relation.referencesShari, Z. (2014). Delivering sustainable building strategies in Malaysia : Stakeholders ’ barriers and inspirations. March.spa
dc.relation.referencesSharma, A., Saxena, A., Sethi, M., & Shree, V. (2011). Life cycle ass. (2014). Resolución 3654 de 2014. 11. https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=61973spa
dc.relation.referencesSerpell, A, & Kort, J. (2006). Sustainable Construction in Chile: a diagnosis. January, 18–20. http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB2081.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSerpell, A, & Kort, J. (2006). Sustainable Construction in Chile: a diagnosis. January, 18–20. http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB2081.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSerpell, Alfredo, Kort, J., & Vera, S. (2013). Awareness, actions, drivers and barriers of sustainable construction in Chile. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(2), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.798597spa
dc.relation.referencesAsessment of buildings : A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 871–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.008spa
dc.relation.referencesSharma, M. (2020). Development of a ‘ Green building sustainability model ’ for Green buildings in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190(2018), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.154spa
dc.relation.referencesShengnan Genga, Yuan Wanga, Jian Zuob, Zhihua Zhoua, Huibin Duc, G. M. a. (2017). Building life cycle assessment research : A review by bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/science/article/pii/S1364032117303830?via%3Dihubspa
dc.relation.referencesShi, Q., Zuo, J., Huang, R., Huang, J., & Pullen, S. (2013). Identifying the critical factors for green construction - An empirical study in China. Habitat International, 40, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.003spa
dc.relation.referencesShin, H., Hwang, J., & Kim, H. (2019). Appropriate technology for grassroots innovation in developing countries for sustainable development : The case of Laos. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.336spa
dc.relation.referencesShuen, D. T. G. P. A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. 18(April 1991), 509–533.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilvius, A. J. G., Utrecht, S., Schipper, R. P. J., Aetsveld, V., & Management, C. (2016). Sustainability in project management : A literature review and impact analysis Delivered by Ingenta to : Guest User Delivered by Ingenta to : Guest User. Social Busniess, 4(1), 63–96.spa
dc.relation.referencesSolaimani, S., & Sedighi, M. (2019). Toward a holistic view on Lean sustainable construction: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119213spa
dc.relation.referencesSoust-Verdaguer, B., Llatas, C., & García-Martínez, A. (2017). Critical review of bim-based LCA method to buildings. Energy and Buildings, 136, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.009spa
dc.relation.referencesSpinak, E. (2001). Indicadores cienciométricos. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1024-94352001000400007spa
dc.relation.referencesStahel, W. (2006). The performance economy.spa
dc.relation.referencesStahel, W. (2019). The circular economy.spa
dc.relation.referencesStanitsas, M., Ph, D., Kirytopoulos, K., & Leopoulos, V. (2021). Integrating sustainability indicators into project management : The case of construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123774spa
dc.relation.referencesSteffens, G. (2017). El análisis PESTEL.spa
dc.relation.referencesSteinberger, J. K., Krausmann, F., & Eisenmenger, N. (2010). Global patterns of materials use : A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.009spa
dc.relation.referencesStephan, A., & Athanassiadis, A. (2018). Towards a more circular construction sector: Estimating and spatialising current and future non-structural material replacement flows to maintain urban building stocks. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 129(April 2017), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.022spa
dc.relation.referencesSun, J., Wu, S., & Yang, K. (2018). An ecosystemic framework for business sustainability. Business Horizons, 61(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesTabassi, A. A., Roufechaei, K. M., Ramli, M., Hassan, A., Bakar, A., Ismail, R., & Pakir, A. H. K. (2016). Leadership competences of sustainable construction project managers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.076spa
dc.relation.referencesTan, Y., Ochoa, J. J., Langston, C., & Shen, L. (2015). An empirical study on the relationship between sustainability performance and business competitiveness of international construction contractors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.034spa
dc.relation.referencesTan, Y., Shen, L., & Yao, H. (2011). Sustainable construction practice and contractors’ competitiveness: A preliminary study. Habitat International, 35(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.008spa
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007spa
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management David. 18(7), 509–533.spa
dc.relation.referencesToledo, R. F. De, Junior, H. L. M., Filho, J. R. F., & Costa, H. G. (2019). A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and project management dataset. Data in Brief, 25, 104312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104312spa
dc.relation.referencesTranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review *. 14, 207–222.spa
dc.relation.referencesTullis, T., & Albert, B. (2013). Self-Reported Metrics. Measuring the User Experience, 121–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-415781-1.00006-6spa
dc.relation.referencesUNEP. (2007). life cycle management.spa
dc.relation.referencesUNEP. (2019). The Business Case For Life Cycle Thinking.spa
dc.relation.referencesUvarova, S., Belyaeva, S., Kankhva, V., & Vlasenko, V. (2016). Implementation of innovative strategy in underground construction as a basis for sustainable economic development of a construction enterprise. Procedia Engineering, 165, 1317–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.857spa
dc.relation.referencesVilches, A., Garcia-Martinez, A., & Sanchez-Montañes, B. (2017). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 135, 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042spa
dc.relation.referencesWebster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future : Writing a Literature Review ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE : WRITING A. 26(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesWibowo, M. A., Elizar, Sholeh, M. N., & Adji, H. S. (2017). Supply Chain Management Strategy for Recycled Materials to Support Sustainable Construction. Procedia Engineering, 171, 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.325spa
dc.relation.referencesWu, P., Song, Y., Hu, X., & Wang, X. (2018). A preliminary investigation of the transition from green building to green community: Insights from LEED ND. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061802spa
dc.relation.referencesWuni, I. Y., Shen, G. Q. P., & Osei-kyei, R. (2019). Energy & Buildings Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy & Buildings, 190, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.010spa
dc.relation.referencesXia, B., Olanipekun, A., Chen, Q., Xie, L., & Liu, Y. (2018). Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.157spa
dc.relation.referencesYin, B. C. L., Laing, R., Leon, M., & Mabon, L. (2018). An evaluation of sustainable construction perceptions and practices in Singapore. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39(December 2017), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.024spa
dc.relation.referencesYu, A. T. W., Yevu, S. K., & Nani, G. (2020). Towards an integration framework for promoting electronic procurement and sustainable procurement in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119493spa
dc.relation.referencesZahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Muneer, S., Butt, B. Z., Isah-Chikaji, A., & Memon, M. A. (2019). Nexus between government initiatives, integrated strategies, internal factors and corporate sustainability practices in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118329spa
dc.relation.referencesZemigala, M. (2019). Tendencies in research on sustainable development in management sciences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.009spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao, Xianbo. (2017). A scientometric review of global BIM research : Analysis and visualization. Automation in Construction, 80(April), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao, Xiaojing, & Hwang, B. (2020). Job Satisfaction of Project Managers in Green Construction Projects : Constituents , Barriers , and Improvement Strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118968spa
dc.relation.referencesZheng, C., Candidate, P. D., Yuan, J., Ph, D., Zhu, L., Ph, D., Zhang, Y., Ph, D., Shao, Q., & Candidate, P. D. (2020). From digital to sustainable : A scientometric review of smart city literature between 1990 and 2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120689spa
dc.relation.referencesZimmermann, R. K., Skjelmose, O., & Jensen, K. G. (2019). Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060spa
dc.relation.referencesZuo, J., Pullen, S., Rameezdeen, R., Bennetts, H., Wang, Y., Mao, G., Zhou, Z., Du, H., & Duan, H. (2017). Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia : A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70(September 2016), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.251spa
dc.relation.referencesZuo, J., & Zhao, Z. Y. (2014). Green building research-current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.021spa
dc.relation.referencesZuo, J., Zillante, G., Wilson, L., Davidson, K., & Pullen, S. (2012). Sustainability policy of construction contractors: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), 3910–3916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.011spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc690 - Construcción de edificiosspa
dc.subject.ddc650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia generalspa
dc.subject.lembConstruction industryeng
dc.subject.lembIndustria de la construcciónspa
dc.subject.lembStrategic Planningeng
dc.subject.lembPlanificación estratégicaspa
dc.subject.proposalOrganizational Strategies (OS)eng
dc.subject.proposalConstrucción Sostenible (CS)spa
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis de Ciclo de Vida (ACV)spa
dc.subject.proposalSustainable Construction (SC)eng
dc.subject.proposalLife Cycle Assessment (LCA)spa
dc.subject.proposalEstrategias Organizacionales (EO)spa
dc.subject.unescoEvaluación del impacto ambientalspa
dc.subject.unescoEnvironmental impact assessmenteng
dc.titleBarreras e impulsores de la construcción sostenible en Colombia. Un enfoque en Análisis de Ciclo de Vida (ACV) y desde Estrategias Organizaciones (EO)spa
dc.title.translatedBarriers and drivers of sustainable construction in Colombia. a focus on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and from Organizational Strategies (OS)eng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1018440550.2021.pdf
Tamaño:
6.68 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Construcción

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: