Modelo de decisión intertemporal para la priorización de alternativas en problemas discretos considerando múltiples criterios

dc.contributor.advisorJaramillo Álvarez, Patricia
dc.contributor.advisorArango Aramburo, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Jiménez, Christian Rafael
dc.contributor.researchgroupCiencias de la decisiónspa
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-23T13:33:45Z
dc.date.available2025-07-23T13:33:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-31
dc.description.abstractAlgunos problemas de priorización de alternativas deben considerar consecuencias respecto a criterios que se distribuyen a lo largo de un horizonte temporal. En este contexto intertemporal, la evaluación de las alternativas respecto a los criterios de priorización se convierte en un conjunto de series de tiempo que representan cómo evolucionan las alternativas. Si bien el contexto dinámico puede afectar la priorización, los modelos tradicionales recomiendan una decisión tomando como referencia el valor actual de cada serie de tiempo y las preferencias asociadas a cada criterio. Aunque esta es una forma práctica de abordar un problema de decisión multicriterio intertemporal y permite hacer uso de métodos ya ampliamente desarrollados, deja de lado importantes singularidades de la distribución temporal de las alternativas respecto a los criterios. Para hacer frente a esta situación, en esta investigación se plantea un modelo de decisión multicriterio que evalúa de forma explícita las series de tiempo que describen cómo se comportan las alternativas respecto a los criterios de decisión. Este modelo tiene como propósito extender la priorización en contextos intertemporales más allá del criterio de valor actual, incluyendo atributos como la tendencia, variabilidad, acumulación en el tiempo, y el cumplimiento de valores mínimos y metas. Como parte de la investigación, se ilustra la propuesta con un caso hipotético y con un caso real, en el que se desea priorizar un conjunto de políticas de descarbonización del transporte terrestre urbano para el Área Metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá, cuyos impactos se perciben entre los años 2023 y 2050, a partir del estudio realizado por Valencia [1]. Los resultados de la investigación muestran que la priorización cambia cuando las alternativas presentan una estructura temporal diferenciadora. (texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractSome alternative prioritization problems must consider consequences related to criteria distributed over a time horizon. In this intertemporal context, the evaluation of alternatives with respect to the prioritization criteria becomes a set of time series that represent how the alternatives evolve. Although the dynamic context can influence prioritization, traditional models recommend making a decision based on the current value of each time series and the preferences associated with each criterion. While this is a practical way to address an intertemporal multicriteria decision problem—making use of well-established methods—it overlooks important features of the temporal distribution of alternatives with respect to the criteria. To address this issue, this research proposes a multicriteria decision model that explicitly evaluates the time series describing how alternatives behave in relation to the decision criteria. The purpose of this model is to extend prioritization in intertemporal contexts beyond the current value criterion, incorporating attributes such as trend, variability, accumulation over time, and the fulfillment of minimum values and targets. As part of the study, the proposal is illustrated with a hypothetical case and a real-world case, in which a set of urban land transport decarbonization policies is prioritized for the Aburrá Valley Metropolitan Area. The impacts of these policies are expected to occur between 2023 and 2050, based on the study conducted by Valencia [1]. The research findings show that prioritization changes when the alternatives exhibit differentiating temporal structures.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemasspa
dc.description.researchareaInvestigación de operacionesspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88376
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Minasspa
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemasspa
dc.relation.references[1] V. Valencia, “Opciones de descarbonización del transporte terrestre en ciudades de Colombia: escenarios a partir de un modelo de dinámica de sistemas,” Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, 2022.spa
dc.relation.references[2] A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. M. D. Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, and A. Valipour, “Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications - A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014,” Econ. Res. Istraz. , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 516–571, 2015, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139.spa
dc.relation.references[3] R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, “Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., vol. 9, no. 7, p. 403, 1979, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310245.spa
dc.relation.references[4] A. Bennet and D. Bennet, “The Decision-Making Process in a Complex Situation,” in Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_1.spa
dc.relation.references[5] J. Krupa, D. Bridges, R. Hunter, D. Baker, G. Johnson, and K. Sorenson, “Guidebook to Decision-Making Methods Decision Making,” 2001.spa
dc.relation.references[6] V. Penadés-Plà, T. García-Segura, J. V. Martí, and V. Yepes, “A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods applied to the sustainable bridge design,” Sustain., vol. 8, no. 12, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8121295.spa
dc.relation.references[7] Q. Dong and Y. Guo, “Multiperiod multiattribute decision-making method based on trend incentive coefficient,” vol. 20, pp. 141–152, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2012.00853.x.spa
dc.relation.references[8] F. Klapproth, “Time and decision making in humans,” Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 509–524, 2008, doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.509.spa
dc.relation.references[9] A. Wong Boren, D. Martha Rodríguez, and D. C. Paula Villalpando, “Decisiones Intertemporales,” XII Congr. Anu. la Acad. Ciencias Adm. A.C., 2008, [Online]. Available: http://acacia.org.mx/busqueda/pdf/M07P41b.pdfspa
dc.relation.references[10] T. L. Saaty, “Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables,” Math. Comput. Model., vol. 46, no. 7–8, pp. 860–891, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.028.spa
dc.relation.references[11] P. C. G. Da Costa and D. M. Buede, “Dynamic decision making: A comparison of approaches,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 243–262, 2000, doi: 10.1002/1099-1360(200011)9:6<243::AID-MCDA281>3.0.CO;2-Z.spa
dc.relation.references[12] G. Campanella and R. A. Ribeiro, “A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.05.003.spa
dc.relation.references[13] Z. Xu, “On multi-period multi-attribute decision making,” vol. 21, pp. 164–171, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2007.05.007.spa
dc.relation.references[14] D. Read and G. Loewenstein, “Time and decision: introduction to the special issue,” J. Behav. Decis. Mak., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 141–144, 2002, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<141::aid-bdm347>3.3.co;2-l.spa
dc.relation.references[15] A. Frini and S. Benamor, “Making Decisions in a Sustainable Development Context : A State-of-the-Art Survey and Proposal of a Multi-period Single Synthesizing Criterion Approach,” Comput. Econ., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 341–385, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10614-017-9677-5.spa
dc.relation.references[16] World Comission on Environment and Development, “The Brundtland Report.,” 1987.spa
dc.relation.references[17] G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec, “Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 573–597, 1992, doi: 10.2307/2118482.spa
dc.relation.references[18] P. H. M. P. Roelofsma, “Modelling intertemporal choices: An anomaly approach,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 93, no. 1–3, pp. 5–22, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(96)00023-6.spa
dc.relation.references[19] G. Loewe, “The Development of a Theory of Rational Intertemporal Choice,” Pap. Rev. Sociol., vol. 80, p. 195, 2006, doi: 10.5565/rev/papers/v80n0.1775.spa
dc.relation.references[20] A. Lazaro, R. Barberan, and E. Rubio, “The discounted utility model and social preferences: Some alternative formulations to conventional discounting,” J. Econ. Psychol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 317–337, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00079-X.spa
dc.relation.references[21] S. Frederick, G. Loewenstein, and T. O’Donoghue, “Time discounting and time preference: A critical review,” Time Decis. Econ. Psychol. Perspect. Intertemporal Choice, vol. XL, no. June, pp. 13–86, 2003, doi: 10.1257/002205102320161311.spa
dc.relation.references[22] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “The Psychology of Preferences.pdf,” Sci. Am., pp. 160–173, 1982.spa
dc.relation.references[23] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “The psychology of preferences,” Sci. Am., vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 160–173, Jan. 1982, doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160.spa
dc.relation.references[24] G. Loewe et al., “Intertemporal choice and the magnitude effect,” J. Econ. Theory, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2018, doi: 10.1037/xge0000198.spa
dc.relation.references[25] Department for Communities and Local Government, Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. 2009. Accessed: Apr. 23, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.communities.gov.ukcommunity,opportunity,prosperityspa
dc.relation.references[26] G. Montibeller and A. Franco, “Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis,” Handb. Multicriteria Anal., vol. 103, no. May 2016, pp. 25–44, 2010, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7.spa
dc.relation.references[27] V. Hongoh, A. Gatewood Hoen, C. Aenishaenslin, J.-P. Waaub, D. Bélanger, and P. Michel, “Spatially explicit multi-criteria decision analysis for managing vector-borne diseases,” 2011. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-10-70.spa
dc.relation.references[28] D. Ubfal, “How general are time preferences? Eliciting good-specific discount rates,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 118, pp. 150–170, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.007.spa
dc.relation.references[29] M. Bystrzanowska and M. Tobiszewski, “How can analysts use multicriteria decision analysis?,” TrAC - Trends Anal. Chem., vol. 105, pp. 98–105, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.05.003.spa
dc.relation.references[30] A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Methods and Software. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.spa
dc.relation.references[31] J. L. Ringuest, “Compromise Programming,” Multiobjective Optim. Behav. Comput. Considerations, pp. 51–59, 1992, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3612-3_4.spa
dc.relation.references[32] V. Podvezko, “The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS,” Eng. Econ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 134–146, 2011, doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.22.2.310.spa
dc.relation.references[33] M. Velasquez and P. Hester, “An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Prog. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 315–322, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s13748-016-0093-1.spa
dc.relation.references[34] B. Muñoz Medina and M. Romana García, “Aplicación de métodos de decisión multicriterio discretos al análisis de alternativas en estudios informativos de infraestructuras de transporte,” Pensam. Matemático, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 27–45, 2016.spa
dc.relation.references[35] A. Kumar et al., “A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 69, no. November 2016, pp. 596–609, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191.spa
dc.relation.references[36] Flavell and RB, “A new goal programming formulation,” Omega, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 731–732, 1976, Accessed: Feb. 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v4y1976i6p731-732.htmlspa
dc.relation.references[37] E. Triantaphyllou, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Springer, Boston, MA, 2000, pp. 5–21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2.spa
dc.relation.references[38] E. Thanassoulis, “Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Use in Banking,” Interfaces (Providence)., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1–13, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1287/inte.29.3.1.spa
dc.relation.references[39] A. Mardani, E. K. Zavadskas, K. Govindan, A. A. Senin, and A. Jusoh, “VIKOR technique: A systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications,” Sustain., vol. 8, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8010037.spa
dc.relation.references[40] S. Erpolat Tasabat and D. Morais, “A novel multicriteria decision-making method based on distance, similarity, and correlation: DSC TOPSIS,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/9125754.spa
dc.relation.references[41] C. Bana e Costa, J.-M. De Corte, and J.-C. Vansnick, “Overview of MACBETH multicriteria decision analysis approach,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 359–387, 2003, [Online]. Available: http://m-macbeth.com/spa
dc.relation.references[42] P. Hansen and F. Ombler, “A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 15, no. 3–4, pp. 87–107, May 2008, doi: 10.1002/mcda.428.spa
dc.relation.references[43] T. L. Saaty, “Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP),” J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–35, 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5.spa
dc.relation.references[44] T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Network Process,” in Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, Springer US, 2006, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1007/0-387-33987-6_1.spa
dc.relation.references[45] C. A. Bana E Costa, J.-M. De Corte, and J.-C. Vansnick, “MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique).” Accessed: Feb. 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: www.m-macbeth.comspa
dc.relation.references[46] H. S. Lee, G. H. Tzeng, W. Yeih, Y. J. Wang, and S. C. Yang, “Revised DEMATEL: Resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 37, no. 10–11, pp. 6746–6757, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.016.spa
dc.relation.references[47] P. Hansen and F. Ombler, “A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 15, no. 3–4, pp. 87–107, 2008, doi: 10.1002/mcda.428.spa
dc.relation.references[48] D. Von Winterfeldt and G. W. Fischer, “Multi-Attribute Utility Theory: Models and Assessment Procedures,” in Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1975, pp. 47–85. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_3.spa
dc.relation.references[49] J. P. Brans and Y. De Smet, “PROMETHEE methods,” Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci., vol. 233, pp. 187–219, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6.spa
dc.relation.references[50] J. R. Figueira, V. Mousseau, and B. Roy, “ELECTRE methods,” Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci., vol. 233, pp. 155–185, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_5.spa
dc.relation.references[51] A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery, Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software. Wiley, 2013. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=oluV7rT6DqIC&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=Ishizaka+multicriteria+decision+analysis&ots=MNsdTsctaA&sig=oaYFEzfsh7lrHOsc1dE8BLyz1sY#v=onepage&q=Ishizaka multicriteria decision analysis&f=falsespa
dc.relation.references[52] B. Roy, “The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods,” Theory Decis., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49–73, Jul. 1991, doi: 10.1007/BF00134132.spa
dc.relation.references[53] J. P. Brans, P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, “How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 228–238, Feb. 1986, doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5.spa
dc.relation.references[54] G. H. Tzeng and K. Y. Shen, New concepts and trends of hybrid multiple criteria decision making. CRC Press, 2017. doi: 10.1201/9781315166650.spa
dc.relation.references[55] C. Kahraman, S. C. Onar, and B. Oztaysi, “Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review,” Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 637–666, 2015, doi: 10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325.spa
dc.relation.references[56] D. Read and G. Loewenstein, “Time and decision: introduction to the special issue,” J. Behav. Decis. Mak., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 141–144, 2000, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<141::aid-bdm347>3.3.co;2-l.spa
dc.relation.references[57] D. Dragone, “Intertemporal decision-making: Economic and cognitive perspectives,” pp. 1–40, 2007.spa
dc.relation.references[58] S. Cruz Rambaud and A. M. Sánchez Pérez, “El efecto peanuts en la toma de decisiones intertemporales.,” Int. J. Dev. Educ. Psychol. Rev. INFAD Psicol., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 163, 2018, doi: 10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n2.v1.1118.spa
dc.relation.references[59] H. Levy and Z. Wiener, “Prospect theory and utility theory: Temporary versus permanent attitude toward risk,” J. Econ. Bus., vol. 68, pp. 1–23, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.01.002.spa
dc.relation.references[60] V. González-Prida, L. Barberá, P. Viveros, and A. Crespo, “Dynamic analytic hierarchy process: AHP method adapted to a changing environment,” IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 45, no. 31, pp. 25–29, 2012, doi: 10.3182/20121122-2-ES-4026.00005.spa
dc.relation.references[61] T. M. Rout and T. Walshe, “Accounting for Time Preference in Management Decisions : An Application to Invasive Species,” vol. 211, no. December 2012, pp. 197–211, 2013, doi: 10.1002/mcda.spa
dc.relation.references[62] S. Hossein, R. Hajiagha, and I. Meidut, “A new dynamic multi-attribute decision making method based on Markov chain and linear assignment,” pp. 159–191, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04644-0.spa
dc.relation.references[63] A. Frini and S. Ben, “MUPOM : A multi-criteria multi-period outranking method for decision- making in sustainable development context,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 76, no. September 2018, pp. 10–25, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.11.002.spa
dc.relation.references[64] B. S. C. Campello, L. T. Duarte, and J. M. T. Romano, “Dealing with multi-criteria decision analysis in time-evolving approach using a probabilistic prediction method,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 116, no. May, p. 105462, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105462.spa
dc.relation.references[65] J. D. Cryer and K.-S. Chan, Time Series With Applications in R. 2008.spa
dc.relation.references[66] G. Piraquive, M. Matamoros, E. Cespedes, and J. Rodríguez Chacón, “Actualización de la tasa de rendimiento del capital en Colombia bajo la metodología de Harberger,” Arch. Econ., vol. 487, p. 44, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/52705spa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingenieríaspa
dc.subject.proposalMulticriteriospa
dc.subject.proposalDecisiones intertemporalesspa
dc.subject.proposalToma de decisiones.spa
dc.subject.proposalMulti-periodospa
dc.titleModelo de decisión intertemporal para la priorización de alternativas en problemas discretos considerando múltiples criteriosspa
dc.title.translatedIntertemporal decision model for the prioritization of alternatives in discrete problems considering multiple criteriaeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1047995737.2023.pdf
Tamaño:
1.35 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: