Modelo de decisión intertemporal para la priorización de alternativas en problemas discretos considerando múltiples criterios
dc.contributor.advisor | Jaramillo Álvarez, Patricia | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Arango Aramburo, Santiago | |
dc.contributor.author | Ortiz Jiménez, Christian Rafael | |
dc.contributor.researchgroup | Ciencias de la decisión | spa |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-23T13:33:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-23T13:33:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-01-31 | |
dc.description.abstract | Algunos problemas de priorización de alternativas deben considerar consecuencias respecto a criterios que se distribuyen a lo largo de un horizonte temporal. En este contexto intertemporal, la evaluación de las alternativas respecto a los criterios de priorización se convierte en un conjunto de series de tiempo que representan cómo evolucionan las alternativas. Si bien el contexto dinámico puede afectar la priorización, los modelos tradicionales recomiendan una decisión tomando como referencia el valor actual de cada serie de tiempo y las preferencias asociadas a cada criterio. Aunque esta es una forma práctica de abordar un problema de decisión multicriterio intertemporal y permite hacer uso de métodos ya ampliamente desarrollados, deja de lado importantes singularidades de la distribución temporal de las alternativas respecto a los criterios. Para hacer frente a esta situación, en esta investigación se plantea un modelo de decisión multicriterio que evalúa de forma explícita las series de tiempo que describen cómo se comportan las alternativas respecto a los criterios de decisión. Este modelo tiene como propósito extender la priorización en contextos intertemporales más allá del criterio de valor actual, incluyendo atributos como la tendencia, variabilidad, acumulación en el tiempo, y el cumplimiento de valores mínimos y metas. Como parte de la investigación, se ilustra la propuesta con un caso hipotético y con un caso real, en el que se desea priorizar un conjunto de políticas de descarbonización del transporte terrestre urbano para el Área Metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá, cuyos impactos se perciben entre los años 2023 y 2050, a partir del estudio realizado por Valencia [1]. Los resultados de la investigación muestran que la priorización cambia cuando las alternativas presentan una estructura temporal diferenciadora. (texto tomado de la fuente) | spa |
dc.description.abstract | Some alternative prioritization problems must consider consequences related to criteria distributed over a time horizon. In this intertemporal context, the evaluation of alternatives with respect to the prioritization criteria becomes a set of time series that represent how the alternatives evolve. Although the dynamic context can influence prioritization, traditional models recommend making a decision based on the current value of each time series and the preferences associated with each criterion. While this is a practical way to address an intertemporal multicriteria decision problem—making use of well-established methods—it overlooks important features of the temporal distribution of alternatives with respect to the criteria. To address this issue, this research proposes a multicriteria decision model that explicitly evaluates the time series describing how alternatives behave in relation to the decision criteria. The purpose of this model is to extend prioritization in intertemporal contexts beyond the current value criterion, incorporating attributes such as trend, variability, accumulation over time, and the fulfillment of minimum values and targets. As part of the study, the proposal is illustrated with a hypothetical case and a real-world case, in which a set of urban land transport decarbonization policies is prioritized for the Aburrá Valley Metropolitan Area. The impacts of these policies are expected to occur between 2023 and 2050, based on the study conducted by Valencia [1]. The research findings show that prioritization changes when the alternatives exhibit differentiating temporal structures. | eng |
dc.description.degreelevel | Maestría | spa |
dc.description.degreename | Magister en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas | spa |
dc.description.researcharea | Investigación de operaciones | spa |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | spa |
dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ | spa |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88376 | |
dc.language.iso | spa | spa |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín | spa |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Minas | spa |
dc.publisher.program | Medellín - Minas - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas | spa |
dc.relation.references | [1] V. Valencia, “Opciones de descarbonización del transporte terrestre en ciudades de Colombia: escenarios a partir de un modelo de dinámica de sistemas,” Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, 2022. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [2] A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. M. D. Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, and A. Valipour, “Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications - A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014,” Econ. Res. Istraz. , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 516–571, 2015, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [3] R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, “Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., vol. 9, no. 7, p. 403, 1979, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310245. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [4] A. Bennet and D. Bennet, “The Decision-Making Process in a Complex Situation,” in Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_1. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [5] J. Krupa, D. Bridges, R. Hunter, D. Baker, G. Johnson, and K. Sorenson, “Guidebook to Decision-Making Methods Decision Making,” 2001. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [6] V. Penadés-Plà, T. García-Segura, J. V. Martí, and V. Yepes, “A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods applied to the sustainable bridge design,” Sustain., vol. 8, no. 12, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8121295. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [7] Q. Dong and Y. Guo, “Multiperiod multiattribute decision-making method based on trend incentive coefficient,” vol. 20, pp. 141–152, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2012.00853.x. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [8] F. Klapproth, “Time and decision making in humans,” Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 509–524, 2008, doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.509. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [9] A. Wong Boren, D. Martha Rodríguez, and D. C. Paula Villalpando, “Decisiones Intertemporales,” XII Congr. Anu. la Acad. Ciencias Adm. A.C., 2008, [Online]. Available: http://acacia.org.mx/busqueda/pdf/M07P41b.pdf | spa |
dc.relation.references | [10] T. L. Saaty, “Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables,” Math. Comput. Model., vol. 46, no. 7–8, pp. 860–891, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.028. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [11] P. C. G. Da Costa and D. M. Buede, “Dynamic decision making: A comparison of approaches,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 243–262, 2000, doi: 10.1002/1099-1360(200011)9:6<243::AID-MCDA281>3.0.CO;2-Z. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [12] G. Campanella and R. A. Ribeiro, “A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.05.003. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [13] Z. Xu, “On multi-period multi-attribute decision making,” vol. 21, pp. 164–171, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2007.05.007. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [14] D. Read and G. Loewenstein, “Time and decision: introduction to the special issue,” J. Behav. Decis. Mak., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 141–144, 2002, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<141::aid-bdm347>3.3.co;2-l. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [15] A. Frini and S. Benamor, “Making Decisions in a Sustainable Development Context : A State-of-the-Art Survey and Proposal of a Multi-period Single Synthesizing Criterion Approach,” Comput. Econ., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 341–385, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10614-017-9677-5. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [16] World Comission on Environment and Development, “The Brundtland Report.,” 1987. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [17] G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec, “Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 573–597, 1992, doi: 10.2307/2118482. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [18] P. H. M. P. Roelofsma, “Modelling intertemporal choices: An anomaly approach,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 93, no. 1–3, pp. 5–22, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(96)00023-6. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [19] G. Loewe, “The Development of a Theory of Rational Intertemporal Choice,” Pap. Rev. Sociol., vol. 80, p. 195, 2006, doi: 10.5565/rev/papers/v80n0.1775. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [20] A. Lazaro, R. Barberan, and E. Rubio, “The discounted utility model and social preferences: Some alternative formulations to conventional discounting,” J. Econ. Psychol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 317–337, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00079-X. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [21] S. Frederick, G. Loewenstein, and T. O’Donoghue, “Time discounting and time preference: A critical review,” Time Decis. Econ. Psychol. Perspect. Intertemporal Choice, vol. XL, no. June, pp. 13–86, 2003, doi: 10.1257/002205102320161311. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [22] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “The Psychology of Preferences.pdf,” Sci. Am., pp. 160–173, 1982. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [23] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “The psychology of preferences,” Sci. Am., vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 160–173, Jan. 1982, doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [24] G. Loewe et al., “Intertemporal choice and the magnitude effect,” J. Econ. Theory, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2018, doi: 10.1037/xge0000198. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [25] Department for Communities and Local Government, Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. 2009. Accessed: Apr. 23, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.communities.gov.ukcommunity,opportunity,prosperity | spa |
dc.relation.references | [26] G. Montibeller and A. Franco, “Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis,” Handb. Multicriteria Anal., vol. 103, no. May 2016, pp. 25–44, 2010, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [27] V. Hongoh, A. Gatewood Hoen, C. Aenishaenslin, J.-P. Waaub, D. Bélanger, and P. Michel, “Spatially explicit multi-criteria decision analysis for managing vector-borne diseases,” 2011. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-10-70. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [28] D. Ubfal, “How general are time preferences? Eliciting good-specific discount rates,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 118, pp. 150–170, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.007. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [29] M. Bystrzanowska and M. Tobiszewski, “How can analysts use multicriteria decision analysis?,” TrAC - Trends Anal. Chem., vol. 105, pp. 98–105, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.05.003. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [30] A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Methods and Software. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [31] J. L. Ringuest, “Compromise Programming,” Multiobjective Optim. Behav. Comput. Considerations, pp. 51–59, 1992, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3612-3_4. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [32] V. Podvezko, “The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS,” Eng. Econ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 134–146, 2011, doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.22.2.310. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [33] M. Velasquez and P. Hester, “An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Prog. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 315–322, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s13748-016-0093-1. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [34] B. Muñoz Medina and M. Romana García, “Aplicación de métodos de decisión multicriterio discretos al análisis de alternativas en estudios informativos de infraestructuras de transporte,” Pensam. Matemático, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 27–45, 2016. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [35] A. Kumar et al., “A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 69, no. November 2016, pp. 596–609, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [36] Flavell and RB, “A new goal programming formulation,” Omega, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 731–732, 1976, Accessed: Feb. 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v4y1976i6p731-732.html | spa |
dc.relation.references | [37] E. Triantaphyllou, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Springer, Boston, MA, 2000, pp. 5–21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [38] E. Thanassoulis, “Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Use in Banking,” Interfaces (Providence)., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1–13, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1287/inte.29.3.1. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [39] A. Mardani, E. K. Zavadskas, K. Govindan, A. A. Senin, and A. Jusoh, “VIKOR technique: A systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications,” Sustain., vol. 8, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8010037. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [40] S. Erpolat Tasabat and D. Morais, “A novel multicriteria decision-making method based on distance, similarity, and correlation: DSC TOPSIS,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/9125754. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [41] C. Bana e Costa, J.-M. De Corte, and J.-C. Vansnick, “Overview of MACBETH multicriteria decision analysis approach,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 359–387, 2003, [Online]. Available: http://m-macbeth.com/ | spa |
dc.relation.references | [42] P. Hansen and F. Ombler, “A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 15, no. 3–4, pp. 87–107, May 2008, doi: 10.1002/mcda.428. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [43] T. L. Saaty, “Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP),” J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–35, 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [44] T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Network Process,” in Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, Springer US, 2006, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1007/0-387-33987-6_1. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [45] C. A. Bana E Costa, J.-M. De Corte, and J.-C. Vansnick, “MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique).” Accessed: Feb. 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: www.m-macbeth.com | spa |
dc.relation.references | [46] H. S. Lee, G. H. Tzeng, W. Yeih, Y. J. Wang, and S. C. Yang, “Revised DEMATEL: Resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 37, no. 10–11, pp. 6746–6757, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.016. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [47] P. Hansen and F. Ombler, “A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 15, no. 3–4, pp. 87–107, 2008, doi: 10.1002/mcda.428. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [48] D. Von Winterfeldt and G. W. Fischer, “Multi-Attribute Utility Theory: Models and Assessment Procedures,” in Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1975, pp. 47–85. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_3. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [49] J. P. Brans and Y. De Smet, “PROMETHEE methods,” Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci., vol. 233, pp. 187–219, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [50] J. R. Figueira, V. Mousseau, and B. Roy, “ELECTRE methods,” Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci., vol. 233, pp. 155–185, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_5. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [51] A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery, Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software. Wiley, 2013. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=oluV7rT6DqIC&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=Ishizaka+multicriteria+decision+analysis&ots=MNsdTsctaA&sig=oaYFEzfsh7lrHOsc1dE8BLyz1sY#v=onepage&q=Ishizaka multicriteria decision analysis&f=false | spa |
dc.relation.references | [52] B. Roy, “The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods,” Theory Decis., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49–73, Jul. 1991, doi: 10.1007/BF00134132. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [53] J. P. Brans, P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, “How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 228–238, Feb. 1986, doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [54] G. H. Tzeng and K. Y. Shen, New concepts and trends of hybrid multiple criteria decision making. CRC Press, 2017. doi: 10.1201/9781315166650. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [55] C. Kahraman, S. C. Onar, and B. Oztaysi, “Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review,” Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 637–666, 2015, doi: 10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [56] D. Read and G. Loewenstein, “Time and decision: introduction to the special issue,” J. Behav. Decis. Mak., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 141–144, 2000, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<141::aid-bdm347>3.3.co;2-l. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [57] D. Dragone, “Intertemporal decision-making: Economic and cognitive perspectives,” pp. 1–40, 2007. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [58] S. Cruz Rambaud and A. M. Sánchez Pérez, “El efecto peanuts en la toma de decisiones intertemporales.,” Int. J. Dev. Educ. Psychol. Rev. INFAD Psicol., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 163, 2018, doi: 10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n2.v1.1118. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [59] H. Levy and Z. Wiener, “Prospect theory and utility theory: Temporary versus permanent attitude toward risk,” J. Econ. Bus., vol. 68, pp. 1–23, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.01.002. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [60] V. González-Prida, L. Barberá, P. Viveros, and A. Crespo, “Dynamic analytic hierarchy process: AHP method adapted to a changing environment,” IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 45, no. 31, pp. 25–29, 2012, doi: 10.3182/20121122-2-ES-4026.00005. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [61] T. M. Rout and T. Walshe, “Accounting for Time Preference in Management Decisions : An Application to Invasive Species,” vol. 211, no. December 2012, pp. 197–211, 2013, doi: 10.1002/mcda. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [62] S. Hossein, R. Hajiagha, and I. Meidut, “A new dynamic multi-attribute decision making method based on Markov chain and linear assignment,” pp. 159–191, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04644-0. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [63] A. Frini and S. Ben, “MUPOM : A multi-criteria multi-period outranking method for decision- making in sustainable development context,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 76, no. September 2018, pp. 10–25, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.11.002. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [64] B. S. C. Campello, L. T. Duarte, and J. M. T. Romano, “Dealing with multi-criteria decision analysis in time-evolving approach using a probabilistic prediction method,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 116, no. May, p. 105462, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105462. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [65] J. D. Cryer and K.-S. Chan, Time Series With Applications in R. 2008. | spa |
dc.relation.references | [66] G. Piraquive, M. Matamoros, E. Cespedes, and J. Rodríguez Chacón, “Actualización de la tasa de rendimiento del capital en Colombia bajo la metodología de Harberger,” Arch. Econ., vol. 487, p. 44, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/52705 | spa |
dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional | spa |
dc.subject.ddc | 620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingeniería | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Multicriterio | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Decisiones intertemporales | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Toma de decisiones. | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Multi-periodo | spa |
dc.title | Modelo de decisión intertemporal para la priorización de alternativas en problemas discretos considerando múltiples criterios | spa |
dc.title.translated | Intertemporal decision model for the prioritization of alternatives in discrete problems considering multiple criteria | eng |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Maestría | spa |
dc.type.content | Text | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- 1047995737.2023.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.35 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 5.74 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción: