Incidencia de las capacidades de exploración y explotación en la innovación. El rol de los factores culturales

dc.contributor.advisorNaranjo Valencia, Julia Clemenciaspa
dc.contributor.authorJurado Salgado, Jorge Ivánspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupCULTURA ORGANIZACIONAL Y GESTION HUMANAspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-19T21:10:58Zspa
dc.date.available2021-01-19T21:10:58Zspa
dc.date.issued2020spa
dc.description.abstractThe present study evaluates the impact of exploration and exploitation capacities on radical and incremental innovation, respectively. Recent studies have indicated the importance of examining said relationship in further depth, through the incorporation of moderating elements, such as culture. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the moderating effect of adaptability and alignment, cultural factors, on the relationship between exploration and exploitation and innovation capacities. On one hand, the moderating effect of adaptability, on the relationship between exploration and radical innovation, was evaluated. On the other, the moderating effect of alignment on the relationship between exploitation and incremental innovation was examined. These relationships were analyzed in a sample of large Colombian companies, from both the industrial and service sectors, by way of structural equation modeling, in Smartpls3. The results indicate a positive relationship between exploration and radical innovation, as well as between exploitation and incremental innovation. Regarding the moderation of cultural factors, it was found that alignment moderated the relationship between exploitation and incremental innovation, but adaptability did not moderate the relationship between exploration and radical innovation. On a practical level, this study may guide companies in their management of cultural factors, in an effort to enhance innovation.spa
dc.description.abstractEste estudio evalúa el impacto de las capacidades de exploración y explotación en la innovación radical e incremental, respectivamente. Estudios recientes han señalado la importancia de profundizar en la relación incorporando elementos moderadores como la cultura. El propósito de este estudio es determinar el efecto moderador de los factores culturales adaptabilidad y alineación, en la relación entre capacidades de exploración y explotación e innovación. Por un lado, se evalúa el efecto moderador de la adaptabilidad en la relación entre exploración e innovación radical. Por otro lado, se evalúa el efecto moderador de la alineación en la relación entre explotación e innovación incremental. Estas relaciones fueron analizadas en una muestra de grandes empresas colombianas tanto del sector industrial como del sector servicios, mediante Structural Equation Modeling in Smartpls3. Los resultados señalan una relación positiva entre exploración e innovación radical, como también entre explotación e innovación incremental. Sobre la moderación de los factores culturales, se encontró que la alineación modera la relación entre explotación e innovación incremental, pero la adaptabilidad no modera la relación entre exploración e innovación radical. A nivel práctico, el estudio orienta las organizaciones sobre la gestión de los factores culturales para mejorar la innovación.spa
dc.description.additionalTesis o trabajo de investigación presentada(o) como requisito parcial para optar al título de: Doctor en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones. -- Línea de Investigación: Organizaciones, sistemas y gestión de la tecnología, la información, el conocimiento y la innovación tecnológica. -- Grupo de Investigación: Cultura Organizacional y Gestión Humana.spa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.format.extent153spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationJurado S. Jorge I. Incidencia de las capacidades de exploración y explotación en la innovación. El rol de los factores culturales.Tesis investigación presentada(o) como requisito parcial para optar al título de: Doctor en Ingeniería- Industria y Organizaciones. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial Manizales, Colombia 2020spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78828
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizalesspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería Industrialspa
dc.publisher.programManizales - Ingeniería y Arquitectura - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizacionesspa
dc.relation.referencesAbernathy, W., & Clark, K. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22.spa
dc.relation.referencesAhuja, G., & Morris, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlbis, N., & Álvarez, I. (2017). A comparative analysis of the innovation performance between foreign subsidiaries and owned domestic firms in Colombian manufacturing sector. Journal Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability, 11(2), 20–41.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013). Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 491-507. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.111/jsbm.12005.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlegre, J., Sengupta, K., & Lapiedra, R. (2013). Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 454–470.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlexiev, A., Jansen, J., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1343-1364.spa
dc.relation.referencesAli, M., & Park, K. (2016). The mediating role of an innovative culture in the relationship between absorptive capacity and technical and non-technical innovation. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1669–1675.spa
dc.relation.referencesAncona, D., Goodman, P., Lawrence, B., & Tushman, M. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645–663.spa
dc.relation.referencesANDI. (2018). Ranking de innovación empresarial. Bogotá: Asociación Nacional de Industriales.spa
dc.relation.referencesANDI. (2019). Insigths del ranking de innovación empresarial. Bogotá: Asociación Nacional de Industriales.spa
dc.relation.referencesArbeláez, M., & Parra, M. (2011). Innovation, R&D Investment and Productivity in Colombian Firms. IDB Working Paper No. IDB-WP-251. Bogotá: Fedesarrollo - Inter-American Development Bank.spa
dc.relation.referencesArias, J. A., & Lozada, N. (2018). Capacidad de innovación de producto y desempeño innovador: efectos moderadores de síndromes organizacionales. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 23(81), 235-252.spa
dc.relation.referencesArnold, T., Fang, E., & Palmatier, R. (2011). The effects of customer acquisition and retention orientations on a firm’s radical and incremental innovation performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 234–251.spa
dc.relation.referencesArranz, N., & De Arroyabe, J. F. (2012). Effect of formal contracts, relational norms and trust on performance of joint research and development projects. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 575-588.spa
dc.relation.referencesAtuahene, K. (2005). Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61–83.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, W., & Sinkula, J. (2007). Does market orientation facilitate balanced innovation programs? An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 316-334.spa
dc.relation.referencesBalachandra, R., & Friar, J. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276–287.spa
dc.relation.referencesBanker, R., Chang, H., & Kemerer, C. (1994). Evidence on economies of scale in software development. Information and Software Technology, 36(5), 275–282.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaum, J. A., Li, S., & Usher, J. (2000). Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains’ Acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 766-811.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeckman, C. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 741–758.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenner, M., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–707.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenner, M., & Tushman, M. (2003). Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerraies, S., & El Abidine, S. (2019). Do leadership styles promote ambidextrous innovation? Case of knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 836-859.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeugelsdijk, S., Koen, C., & Noorderhaven, N. (2009). A dyadic approach to the impact of differences in organizational culture on relationship performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(3), 312-323.spa
dc.relation.referencesBiazzo, S. (2009). Flexibility, structuration, and simultaneity in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 336–353.spa
dc.relation.referencesBooz Allen & Hamilton. (1982). New Product Management for the 1980s. New York: Booz Allen & Hamilton.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoumgarden, P; Nickerson, J & Zenger, T.R (2012). Sailing into the wind: exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 587-610spa
dc.relation.referencesBrem, A., & Voigt, K. (2009). Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry. Technovation, 29(5), 351–367.spa
dc.relation.referencesBryman, A. (1988). Quantity y Quality in Social Research. New York: Ed . Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuccier, D., Javalg, R., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities. International Business Review, 29, 1-15spa
dc.relation.referencesBüschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. (2010). Organizational culture and climate:An integrative review. In Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management.spa
dc.relation.referencesBüschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. (2013). Organizational Culture and Innovation: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 763–781.spa
dc.relation.referencesBusom, I., & Vélez, J. (2017). Innovation, Public Support, and Productivity in Colombia. A Cross-industry Comparison. World Development, 99, 75–94.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. New York: Addison-Wesley.spa
dc.relation.referencesCamio, M. I. (2012). La dimensión emocional en las culturas innovadoras. Un estudio de casos de Pymes de software. Faedpyme international review, 1(2), 53-61.spa
dc.relation.referencesCamisón, C., Boronat, M., & Forés, B. (2018). The interplay between firms’ internal and external capabilities in exploration and exploitation. Management Decision, 56(7), 1559–1580.spa
dc.relation.referencesCamisón, C., Forés, B., & Boronat, M. (2016). Cluster and firm-specific antecedents of organizational innovation. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(6), 617–646.spa
dc.relation.referencesCao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarmeli, A., & Halevi, M. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207-218. doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011.spa
dc.relation.referencesChandy, R., & Tellis, G. (1998). Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 474-487.spa
dc.relation.referencesChandy, R., & Tellis, G. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1-17. doi:www.jstor.org/stable/3203484.spa
dc.relation.referencesChatman, J., Caldwell, D., O’Reilly, C., & Doerr, B. (2014). Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high‐technology firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 785-808.spa
dc.relation.referencesCho, H., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555-575.spa
dc.relation.referencesChudnovsky, D., López, A., & Pupato, G. (2006). Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms’ behavior (1992–2001). Research Policy, 35(2), 266–288.spa
dc.relation.referencesCirera, X., & Maloney, W. (2017). The innovation paradox: Developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. New York: The World Bank.spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumspa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.spa
dc.relation.referencesCooper, R., & De Brentani, U. (1991). New industrial financial services: What distinguishes the winners? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(2), 75-90.spa
dc.relation.referencesCórdoba, J., & Naranjo, J. (2017). Incidencia de la inversión en innovación en las ventas de productos innovadores. Evidencia empírica en empresas manufactureras de Colombia. Información Tecnológica, 28(2), 153–166.spa
dc.relation.referencesCostanza, D., Blacksmith, N., Coats, M., Severt, J., & DeCostanza, A. (2015). The Effect of Adaptive Organizational Culture on Long-Term Survival. Journal Bus Psycholgie - Springer Science+Business, DOI 10.1007/s10869-015-9420-y.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoy, D., Ruiz, O. & Botero, L. (2016). Experiencia de co-creación para la generación de cultura de innovación: hacia la formulación de una estrategia de innovación para una institución universitaria. En COGESTEC, Comunidad de Gestión Tecnológica y de la Innovación. Medellín: COGESTEC.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrespi, G., & Zuñiga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: Evidence from six latin american countries. World Development, 40(2), 273–290.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrossan, M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.spa
dc.relation.referencesCuevas, G., Cabello, C., & Carmona, A. (2014). Product Innovation: Do They Always Work Well Together? British Journal of Management, 25(2), 266-284.spa
dc.relation.referencesDamanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.spa
dc.relation.referencesDamanpour, F. (1996). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models. Management Science, 42, 693-716.spa
dc.relation.referencesDamanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of products and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 45-65.spa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2018). Octava Encuesta Nacional de Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico (Sector Servicios) 2016-2017. Obtenido de Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística: http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-innovacion/encuestade-desarspa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2019). Octava Encuesta Nacional de Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico (Industria Manufacturera) 2017-2018. Obtenido de Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística: http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-innovacion/encuestade-desarspa
dc.relation.referencesde Araújo, A. L., Knudsen, M. P., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2014). Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices. Technovation, 34(3), 149-161.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D. (2014). Contextual ambidexterity in SMEs: the roles of internal and external rivalry. Small Business Economics, 42(1), 191–205.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.spa
dc.relation.referencesDellana, S., & Hauser, R. (1999). Toward defining the quality culture. Engineering Management Journal, 11(2), 11-15.spa
dc.relation.referencesDenison, D. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: Wiley.spa
dc.relation.referencesDenison, D., & Mishra, A. (1995). Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223.spa
dc.relation.referencesDouglas, T., & Judge, W. (2001). Total Quality Management Implementation and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Structural Control and Exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 158-169.spa
dc.relation.referencesDroge, C., Calantone, R., & Harmancioglu, N. (2008). New product success: Is it really controllable by managers in highly turbulent environments? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 272-286.spa
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105–1121.spa
dc.relation.referencesFalk, R., & Miller, N. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFelício, J., Caldeirinha, V., & Dutra, A. (2019). Ambidextrous capacity in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 101, 607–614.spa
dc.relation.referencesFischer, T. A., Huber, T. L., & Dibbern, J. (2011). Contractual and relational governance as substitutes and complements–explaining the development of different relationships. In Theory-guided modeling and empiricism in information systems research (pp. 65-83). Physica-Verlag HD.spa
dc.relation.referencesFornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing research, 18(3), 382-388. doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalbraith, J. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesGallego, J., Gutiérrez, L., & Taborda, R. (2015). Innovation and Productivity in the Colombian Service and Manufacturing Industries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3), 612–634.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, D., & Gálvez, E. (2012). Impacto de la innovación sobre el rendimiento de la MIPYME: Un estudio empírico en Colombia. Estudios gerenciales, 28(122), 11-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, D., Gálvez, E., & Maldonado, G. (2016). Efecto de la innovación en el crecimiento y el desempeño de las Mipymes de la Alianza del Pacífico. Un estudio empírico. Estudios Gerenciales, 32(141), 326-335.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110-32.spa
dc.relation.referencesGatignon, H., Tushman, M., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. (2002). A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics. Management Science, 48(9), 1103–1122.spa
dc.relation.referencesGattermann, M., Hoffmann, C., Jiménez, D., & Cegarra, J. (2016). Network Effects on Radical Innovation and Financial Performance: An Open-mindedness Approach. BAR (Brazilian Administration Review), 13(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160057.spa
dc.relation.referencesGefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407.spa
dc.relation.referencesGhoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 91–112.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterit. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. doi.org/10.5465/20159573.spa
dc.relation.referencesGil, M., & Moreno, M. (2013). Driving human resources towards quality and innovation in a highly competitive environment. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 839–860. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2013-0183.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, H., & Mitchell, D. (2014). Innovación y emprendimiento en Colombia-Balance, perspectivas y recomendaciones de política: 2014-2018. Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo, 73.spa
dc.relation.referencesGordon, G. G. (1985). The relationship of corporate culture to industry sector and corporate performance. Gaining control of the corporate culture, 103, 125.spa
dc.relation.referencesGordon, G., & DiTomaso, N. (1992). Predicting corporate performance from organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6).spa
dc.relation.referencesGrazzi, M., & Pietrobelli, C. (2016). El desempeño de las empresas en América Latina y el Caribe: factores microeconómicos y el rol de la innovación. La Política de innovación en América Latina y el Caribe, 25.spa
dc.relation.referencesHair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.spa
dc.relation.referencesHair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Ángeles: SAGE.spa
dc.relation.referencesHalevi, M., Carmeli, A., & Brueller, N. (2015). Ambidexterity in SBUs: TMT behavioral integration and environmental dynamism. Human Resource Management, 54, 2-16. doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21665.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarmancioglu, N., Grinstein, A., & Goldman, A. (2010). Innovation and performance outcomes of market information collection efforts: The role of top management team involvement. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(1), 33–43. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.09.005.spa
dc.relation.referencesHe, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078.spa
dc.relation.referencesHelfat, C. (2007). Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization, 5(2), 185–192. doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077559.spa
dc.relation.referencesHenseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernandez, M., Molina, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2012). Learning processes, their impact on innovation performance and the moderating role of radicalness. European Journal of Innovation Management. 15(1), 77-98.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la Investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México: McGraw-Hill, Interamericana.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación. México: McGrawHill.spa
dc.relation.referencesHill, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2014). Ambidexterity and Survival in Corporate Venture Units. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1899–1931. doi.org/10.1177/0149206312445925.spa
dc.relation.referencesHofstede, G. (2010). The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1339–1346. doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.31.spa
dc.relation.referencesHogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model. Journal of business research, 67(8), 1609-1621.spa
dc.relation.referencesHollander, S. (1965). The sources of increased efficiency: A study of DuPont rayon plants. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: an empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15(1), 70-81.spa
dc.relation.referencesHu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.spa
dc.relation.referencesHurley, R., & Hult, G. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54.spa
dc.relation.referencesIm, G., & Rai, A. (2008). Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships. Management Science, 54(7), 1281–1296. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0902.spa
dc.relation.referencesJansen, J., Tempelaar, M., van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415.spa
dc.relation.referencesJansen, J., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaramillo, L., Fuentes, N., Ramírez, A., & López, A. (2016). Diagnóstico de la cultura empresarial de innovación en empresas de Medellín-Colombia. En COGESTEC, Comunidad de Gestión Tecnológica y de la Innovación. Medellín: COGESTEC.spa
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, D., & Sanz, R. (2012). Efectos de la estrategia de innovación en el éxito de los nuevos productos: el papel moderador del entorno. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de La Empresa, 21(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rede.spa
dc.relation.referencesJunni, P., Sarala, R., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312. doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015.spa
dc.relation.referencesKang, S., & Snell, S. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous lerning: a framework for human resource management. Journal of Management, 65-92. doi.org/10.11/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesKauppila, O. (2010). Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships. Strategic Organization, 8(4), 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127010387409.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S., & Mir, A. (2019). Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations: The role of organizational slack and environmental factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 652–663. doi.org/10.1002/bse.2287.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhazanchi, S., Lewis, M., & Boyer, K. (2007). Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 871–884. doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.003.spa
dc.relation.referencesKyriakopoulos, K., & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219–240. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.001.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaursen, K., & Slater, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among u.k. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150.spa
dc.relation.referencesLavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. (2010). Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. doi.org/10.1080/19416521003691287.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, C., & Huang, Y. (2012). Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance. Management Decision, 20(6), 1096-1116.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, K., Woo, H., & Joshi, K. (2017). Pro-innovation culture, ambidexterity and new product development performance: Polynomial regression and response surface analysis. European Management Journal, 35(2), 249–26spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, R., Lee, J.-H., & Garrett, T. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, 507–515. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.032.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeifer, R., O’Connor, G., & Rice, M. (2001). Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(3), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.5229646.spa
dc.relation.referencesLennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2020). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal, 38(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.spa
dc.relation.referencesLevinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, W., Ing, H., Wei, H., & Pey, D. (2019) Aligning organizational culture and operations strategy to improve innovation outcomes: An integrated perspective in organizational management. Journal of Organizational Change Management,spa
dc.relation.referencesLichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2006). Attitudes to externally organising knowledge management tasks: a review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome. R&D Management, 36(4), 367-386.spa
dc.relation.referencesLim, E., & António, N. S. (2020). National culture as a moderator in ambidexterity-performance relationships: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 21(1), 128-149.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez, E., Garcia, F., & García, S. (2012). De la organización que aprende a la organización ambidiestra: Evolución teórica del aprendizaje organizativo. Cuadernos de Administración, 25(45), 11–37.spa
dc.relation.referencesMadanmohan, T. (2005). Incremental Technicak innovations and their determinants. International Journal of Innovation Management (Ijim), 09(04), 481–510.spa
dc.relation.referencesMalaver, F., & Vargas, M. (2011). Formas de innovar, desempeño innovador y competitividad industrial. Un estudio a partir de la segunda encuesta de innovación en la industria de Bogotá y Cundinamarca. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarch, J. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarsh, H., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341.spa
dc.relation.referencesMatzler, K., Abfalter, D., Mooradian, T., & Bailom, F. (2013). Corporate culture as an antecedent of successful exploration and exploitation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(05), doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613500254.spa
dc.relation.referencesMay, T. (2011). Social research: Issues, methods and process. New York, NY & Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcLaughlin, P., Bessant, J., & Smart, P. (2008). Developing an organisation culture to facilitate radical innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(3/4), 298-323. doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.021041.spa
dc.relation.referencesMenguc, B., & Auh, S. (2010). Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 820-831.spa
dc.relation.referencesMenon, A., G., S., Bharadwaj, P., Tej, A., & Steven W., E. (1999). Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Strategy Making: A Model and a Test. Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 18-40.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562. doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305755.spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina, F., Jiménez, D., & Munuera, J. (2011). Product competence exploitation and exploration strategies: The impact on new product performance through quality and innovativeness. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1172–1182.spa
dc.relation.referencesMom, T., Fourné, S., & Jansen, J. (2015). Managers’ Work Experience, Ambidexterity, and Performance: The Contingency Role of the Work Context. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s133–s153. doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21663.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoon, H., Quigley, N. R., & Marr, J. C. (2012). How interpersonal motives explain the influence of organizational culture on organizational productivity, creativity, and adaptation: The ambidextrous interpersonal motives (AIM) model of organizational culture. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(2), 109-128.spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, S., & Marquis, D. (1969). Successful industrial innovations. A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaranjo, J. C., Valle, R., & Jiménez, D. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 466-480.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaranjo, J., Calderón, G., Jiménez, D., & Sanz, R. (2018). Entrepreneurship and innovation: Evidence in colombian SMEs. En Handbook of Research on Intrapreneurship and Organizational Sustainability in SMEs (págs. 294–316). IGI Global.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaranjo, J., Jimenez, D., & Sanz, R. (2017a). Impact of Organisational Culture on New Product Success: an Empirical Study of Spanish Firms. European Management Review, 14(4), 377–390. doi.org/10.1111/emre.12116.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaranjo, J. C., Jiménez‐Jiménez, D. & Sanz‐Valle, R. (2017b). Organizational culture and radical innovation: Does innovative behavior mediate this relationship?. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 26, pp. 407-417.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaranjo, J., Valle, R., & Jiménez, D. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaranjo, J., Vidal, R., & Calderón, G. (2019). Characterization of Innovation Research Published in Latin American Journals Indexed in WoS. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), 16(07), 1–38.spa
dc.relation.referencesNatarajan, R. (2002). Computer-aided power system analysis. CRC Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaveh, E., & Erez, M. (2004). Innovation and attention to detail in the quality improvement paradigm. Management Science, 50(11), 1576-1586.spa
dc.relation.referencesNewburry, W., McIntyre, J., & Xavier, W. (2016). Exploring the interconnections between institutions, innovation, geography, and internationalization in emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(2), https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-04-2015-0080.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunnally, J., & Berenstein, I. H. (1967). Teoría psicométrica. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Connor, G. (2008). Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability: A Systems Approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 313–330. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.spa
dc.relation.referencesOcampo, A., Naranjo, J., & Calderón, H. (2020). How the Perception of Obstacles to Innovation Affects Innovation Results. Evidence in a Developing Country. In press.spa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE. (2005). Manual de Oslo: Directrices para la recogida e interpretación de información sobre innovación. Madrid: Grupo Trasga.spa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE. (2013). Estudio de la OCDE de las políticas de innovación en Colombia - punto de evaluación general y recomendaciones. Bogotá: Observatorio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.spa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th edition. Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesPara, L., Jiménez, D., & Martínez, A. (2018). Exploring the mediating effects between transformational leadership and organizational performance. Employee Relations, 40(2), 412–432.doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2016-0190.spa
dc.relation.referencesPelagio, R., & Hechanova, M. (2014). A Study of Culture Dimensions, Organizational Ambidexterity, and Perceived Innovation in Teams. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(3), 21–33.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000300002.spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez, A., & Cambra, J. (2013). Listen to the market: Do its complexity and signals make companies more innovative? Technovation, 33(6–7), 180–192. doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.03.001.spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez, A., Alegre, J., & Valle, R. (2019). The role of tacit knowledge in connecting knowledge exchange and combination with innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(2), 186–198.spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez, A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Cabrera, R. (2014). Innovation and Performance: The Role of Environmental Dynamism on the Success of Innovation Choices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(3), 499–510. doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2014.2318085.spa
dc.relation.referencesPopadiuk, S. (2012). Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 75–87. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.001.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrajogo, D. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance: A comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 218-225.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrajogo, D., & McDermott, C. (2005). The relationship between total quality management practices and organizational culture. The International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(11), 1101-1122.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuinn, R. (1984). Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward an integrative framework. En D. M. J. G. Hunt, Leaders and managers: International perspectives on managerial behavior and leidership (págs. 10-27). New York: Pergamon Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuinn, R. (1988). Beyond rational management: Managing the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey – Bass.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuinn, R., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organisational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.spa
dc.relation.referencesReid, S., & de Brentani, U. (2004). The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(3), 170–184. doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, P., & Amit, R. (2003). The dynamics of innovative activity and competitive advantage: The case of Australian retail banking, 1981-1995. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 25-41.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, J., & Castellanos, O. (2016). La metamorfosis de una organización que innova. En COGESTEC, Comunidad de Gestión Tecnológica y de la Innovación. Medellín: COGESTEC.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuano, L., Echeverri, R., Rodríguez, H., Castellanos, T., & Pineda, D. (2016). Public Policy for the promotion of innovation in the Food Sector in Colombia. Cuadernos de Administración (Universidad Del Valle), 32(56), 100–114.spa
dc.relation.referencesRubera, G., & Droge, C. (2013). Technology versus design innovation’s effects on sales and Tobin’s Q: The moderating role of branding strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 448–464.spa
dc.relation.referencesRubera, G., Chandrasekaran, D., & Ordanini, A. (2016). Open innovation, product portfolio innovativeness and firm performance: the dual role of new product development capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(2), 166–184. doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0423-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchoonhoven, C. (1993). The innovation marathon: lessons from high technology firms. Jossey-Bass Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesSheremata, W. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 389–408.spa
dc.relation.referencesShi, X; Su, L & Peng, A (2020). A meta-analytic study on exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35 (1), 97-115.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilveira, E., Rosseto, C., Lima, N., & Torres, S. (2014). Strategic behavior and ambidexterity : a study applied along the Brazilian wineries. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 16(52), 392–415. doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v16i52.1540.spa
dc.relation.referencesSim, E., Griffin, A., Price, R., & Vojak, B. (2007). Exploring Differences between Inventors, Champions, Implementers and Innovators in Creating and Developing New Products in Large, Mature Firms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 422–436. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00457.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesSolís, M., Hernández, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2020). Governance and performance in co-exploitation and co-exploration projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 875-894spa
dc.relation.referencesSolís, M., Hernández, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181–194. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.001.spa
dc.relation.referencesSolís, M., Hernández, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2017). Impact of SENA on innovation of manufacturing companies in Colombia: From the Ambidextrous Organizational perspective. Informador Técnico, 81 (1), 9-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesSong, X., Thieme, R., & Xie, J. (1998). The Impact of Cross-Functional Joint Involvement across Product Development Stages: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4), 289-303.spa
dc.relation.referencesSorensen, J., & Stuart, T. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.spa
dc.relation.referencesSubramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.spa
dc.relation.referencesSubramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631-647.spa
dc.relation.referencesSundbo, J., Orfila, F., & Sorensen, F. (2007). The innovative behaviour of tourism firms – Comparative studies of Denmark and Spain. Research Policy, 36(1), 88–106.spa
dc.relation.referencesSzydło, J., & Grześ-Bukłaho, J. (2020). Relations between National and Organisational Culture—Case Study. Sustainability, 12(4), 1522.spa
dc.relation.referencesTabeau, K., Gemser, G., Hultink, E., & Wijnberg, N. (2017). Exploration and exploitation activities for design innovation. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(3–4), 203–225.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.spa
dc.relation.referencesTellis, G., Prabhu, J., & Chandy, R. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73, 3–23.spa
dc.relation.referencesThieme, R., Song, X., & Shin, G. (2003). Project Management Characteristics and New Product Survival. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 104–119. doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.2002004.spa
dc.relation.referencesTian, M., Deng, P., Zhang, Y., & Salmador, M. P. (2018). How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review. Management Decision.spa
dc.relation.referencesTiwana, A. (2010). Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 87-126.spa
dc.relation.referencesTorres, J., Drago, C., & Aqueveque, C. (2015). Knowledge inflows effects on middle managers’ ambidexterity and performance. Management Decision, 53(10), 2303 - 2330.spa
dc.relation.referencesTroy, L., Szymanski, D., & Varadarajan, P. (2001). Generating New Product Ideas: An Initial Investigation of the Role of Market Information and Organizational Characteristics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 89–101. doi.org/10.1177/0092070301291006.spa
dc.relation.referencesTushman, M., & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesValverde, D., Fisher, A., Ferreira, M., & de Almeida, K. (2012). A Relação Entre Cultura Organizacional, Liderança E Inovação Para Construção De Ciclos De Crescimento Sustentáveis. Obtenido de Mirage: http://repositorio.uninove.br/xmlui/spa
dc.relation.referencesVerganti, R. (2011). Radical design and technology epiphanies: A new focus for research on design management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 384–388.spa
dc.relation.referencesVesga, R. (2009). Emprendimiento e innovación en Colombia: ¿qué nos está haciendo falta? Obtenido de Observatorio de Competitividad Del Centro de Estrategia y Competitividad: http://relidera.com/blog/27-emprendimiento-e-innovacion-en-colombia-que-nos-esta-haciendo-falta.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesVillalobos, M-A. & Romo, A. (2015) Diseño y validación de cuestionario para la exploración de capacidades de innovación para empresas de alta tecnología de México. Revista QUID (25) 33-40.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, C., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous Organizational Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovation: A Comparative Study of UK and Chinese High-tech Firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58–76. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesWei, Z., Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational Learning Ambidexterity, Strategic Flexibility, and New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832–847. doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12126.spa
dc.relation.referencesWolpert, J. (2002). Breaking out of the innovation box. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 76–83.spa
dc.relation.referencesWu, Y., & Wu, S. (2016). Managing ambidexterity in creative industries: A survey. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2388–2396. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.008.spa
dc.relation.referencesWuyts, S., Dutta, S., & Stremersch, S. (2004). Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 88–100. doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.88.27787.spa
dc.relation.referencesYalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R., & Griffith, D. (2007). An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 63–93. doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.4.63.spa
dc.relation.referencesZahra, S., Ireland, R., & Hitt, M. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, H., Wu, F., & Cui, A. (2015). Balancing market exploration and market exploitation in product innovation: A contingency perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), 297–308.spa
dc.relation.referencesZuñiga, A., Perdomo, G., & Lozada, N. (. (2018). Analysis of the relationship between assimilation capabilities and organisational performance. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 16(3), 388-398.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias socialesspa
dc.subject.ddc650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia generalspa
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales::306 - Cultura e institucionesspa
dc.subject.proposalExploraciónspa
dc.subject.proposalExplorationeng
dc.subject.proposalexploitationeng
dc.subject.proposalinnovación radicalspa
dc.subject.proposalinnovación incrementalspa
dc.subject.proposalradical innovationeng
dc.subject.proposalincremental innovationeng
dc.subject.proposaladaptabilidadspa
dc.subject.proposalalineaciónspa
dc.subject.proposaladaptabilityeng
dc.subject.proposalColombiaspa
dc.subject.proposalalignmenteng
dc.subject.proposalcultura organizacionalspa
dc.subject.proposalColombiaeng
dc.subject.proposalorganizational cultureeng
dc.titleIncidencia de las capacidades de exploración y explotación en la innovación. El rol de los factores culturalesspa
dc.title.alternativeImpact of exploration and exploitation capacities on innovation. The role of cultural factorsspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
10259723.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
2.55 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: