Effects of GSCM practices on sustainable performance of colombian manufacturing companies : A dynamic capabilities view

dc.contributor.advisorSarache, William
dc.contributor.advisorSellitto, Miguel Afonso
dc.contributor.authorTrujillo Gallego, Mariana
dc.contributor.cvlacTrujillo, Marianaspa
dc.contributor.googlescholarMariana Trujillospa
dc.contributor.orcidTrujillo Gallego, Mariana [0000000189098523]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateMariana Trujillospa
dc.contributor.researchgroupInnovación y Desarrollo Tecnológicospa
dc.contributor.scopusTrujillo Gallego, Mariana [57209218206]spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-06T16:14:26Z
dc.date.available2024-08-06T16:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptiongraficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractCurrently, environmental problems represent the principal adversity facing the planet. A major source of ecosystem imbalance has been attributed to industrial activities, as they pose a threat to human, animal and plant life, and health. In addition, factors such as rapid technological progress, more competitive and dynamic markets, high industrialization, and pressures to be more sustainable, have increased the vulnerability of manufacturing companies and their supply chains. To address such challenges, the actions developed by organizations must be viewed from a Dynamic Capabilities View, as companies need to create and build environmentally dynamic capabilities to achieve competitive advantage in dynamic environments and improved sustainable performance. Although the literature in the field of green supply chain management (GSCM) and sustainability is growing in the manufacturing sector, there is a lack of clarity about the effects of GSCM environmental practices on economic, environmental and social performance of manufacturing companies from a Dynamic Capabilities View (DCV). Consequently, this doctoral thesis aims to identify and analyze the effects of GSCM practices on sustainable performance in the context of the Colombian manufacturing industry from a Dynamic Capabilities View. Based on the state-of-the-art studies in the field, a theoretical model composed of six research hypotheses was proposed, which is based on three fundamental axes: dynamic capabilities (DCs), the GSCM and sustainable performance. From this perspective, the concept of "environmental dynamic capabilities of Green Supply Chain Management" is initially proposed. Afterwards, a hierarchy of environmental dynamic capabilities is proposed, consisting of higher and lower order capabilities, as well as the effects of the former on the latter. Subsequently, based on the DCV approach, which has its roots in the idea that performance results are due to the configuration of the set of resources and capabilities of companies and not on capabilities themselves, it is postulated that the lower-order environmental dynamic capabilities mediate the relationship between the higher-order environmental dynamic capabilities and sustainable performance (economic, environmental and social). Additionally, due to the lack of clarity about the relationship between the three dimensions of sustainable performance, dyadic relationships between them are proposed. From the literature, nine environmental constructs were defined: Internal Environmental Management, ecodesign, environmental collaboration with customers, digital technologies, green human resource management, green purchasing, green manufacturing, green logistics, and reverse logistics; as were three sustainable performance constructs: economic, environmental and social performance. Also, size, firm age and export orientation were considered as moderating variables. A survey was designed, validated and applied to a sample of 281 manufacturing companies in Colombia. The data collected was analyzed using a partial least squares structural equation modeling approach (PLS-SEM) through a four-step procedure that included data and model characterisation, measurement model, structural model and predictive capacity, as well as robustness analyses. The results validated the proposed theoretical model, showing that there is a hierarchy of environmental dynamic capabilities, and that this hierarchy influences sustainable performance, as it was found that higher-order environmental dynamic capabilities indirectly influence sustainable performance through lower-order environmental dynamic capabilities. Additionally, it was found that there is a balance between the three dimensions of sustainable performance as a result of the effects of environmental dynamic capabilities, which provides evidence for the win-win paradigm, as well as the progressive relationships between the three pillars. As for the moderating variables, the multi-group analysis revealed statistical differences only for firm size. This doctoral thesis presents a novel contribution to the field of study by identifying and analyzing the effects of the GSCM approach on sustainable performance (economic, environmental and social) from DCV in Colombian manufacturing firms. Specifically, the contribution of this doctoral thesis is highlighted by proposing the concept of "environmental dynamic capabilities of the GSCM", an integrated framework of nine environmental dynamic capabilities, and a theoretical model that proposes and empirically validates a hierarchy of environmental dynamic capabilities and their effects on sustainable performance. Additionally, the results obtained provide new knowledge regarding the win-win paradigm of sustainability, by proposing and empirically validating that environmental dynamic capabilities can directly improve the social and environmental performance of a company, and indirectly improve its economic performance. In terms of methodological contributions, the construction and validation of the data collection instrument are highlighted, which serves as a reference for future research focused on green supply chains and sustainable performance in manufacturing companies not only in the Colombian context, yet also in other regions. Another relevant methodological contribution is the application of PLS-SEM for data analysis using a novel four-step procedure, which combines different advanced and recent techniques such as mediation analysis, new techniques for measurement model analysis and predictive validity of the model, and robustness analysis such as observed and unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity. From a practical perspective, the research results are expected to serve as a roadmap for managers and decision-makers to improve sustainable performance step-by-step, plan the development of environmental dynamic capabilities, and guide investments in corporate sustainability. Furthermore, the findings obtained can be of relevance for decision makers and policy formulators in the country, as they can shed light on how the industrial sector can achieve better economic, environmental and social results from the development of environmental dynamic capabilities of the GSCM approach. Finally, the dissemination of knowledge derived from this doctoral thesis has resulted in four scientific articles being published in high impact factor journals, a research book, a book chapter, the presentation of three papers in international conferences, three papers in national conferences, a doctoral internship abroad, and a prize being awarded for the best paper in an international conference (Texto tomado de la fuente)eng
dc.description.abstractEn la actualidad, los problemas medioambientales representan la principal adversidad a la que se enfrenta el planeta. Una de las principales fuentes de desequilibrio de los ecosistemas se ha atribuido a las actividades industriales, ya que suponen una amenaza para la vida y la salud humana, animal y vegetal. Además, factores como el rápido progreso tecnológico, unos mercados más competitivos y dinámicos, la elevada industrialización y las presiones para ser más sostenibles han aumentado la vulnerabilidad de las empresas manufactureras y sus cadenas de suministro. Para hacer frente a estos retos, las acciones desarrolladas por las organizaciones deben contemplarse desde una perspectiva de capacidades dinámicas, ya que las empresas necesitan crear y construir capacidades dinámicas desde el punto de vista medioambiental para lograr una ventaja competitiva en entornos dinámicos y un mejor rendimiento sostenible. Aunque la literatura en el campo de la gestión verde de la cadena de suministro (GSCM) y la sostenibilidad está creciendo en el sector manufacturero, hay una falta de claridad sobre los efectos de las prácticas ambientales de GSCM en el rendimiento económico, ambiental y social de las empresas manufactureras desde una Visión Capacidades Dinámicas (DCV). En consecuencia, esta tesis doctoral tiene como objetivo identificar y analizar los efectos de las prácticas de GSCM sobre el desempeño sostenible en el contexto de la industria manufacturera colombiana desde una visión de Capacidades Dinámicas. Con base en el estado del arte de los estudios en el campo, se propuso un modelo teórico compuesto por seis hipótesis de investigación, el cual se basa en tres ejes fundamentales: las capacidades dinámicas (CD), la GSCM y el desempeño sostenible. Desde esta perspectiva, se propone inicialmente el concepto de "capacidades dinámicas medioambientales de la gestión ecológica de la cadena de suministro". Posteriormente, se propone una jerarquía de capacidades dinámicas medioambientales, compuesta por capacidades de orden superior e inferior, así como los efectos de las primeras sobre las segundas. Posteriormente, basándose en el enfoque DCV, que hunde sus raíces en la idea de que los resultados de rendimiento se deben a la configuración del conjunto de recursos y capacidades de las empresas y no a las capacidades en sí mismas, se postula que las capacidades dinámicas medioambientales de orden inferior median en la relación entre las capacidades dinámicas medioambientales de orden superior y el rendimiento sostenible (económico, medioambiental y social). Además, debido a la falta de claridad sobre la relación entre las tres dimensiones del rendimiento sostenible, se proponen relaciones diádicas entre ellas. A partir de la literatura, se definieron nueve constructos medioambientales: Gestión medioambiental interna, ecodiseño, colaboración medioambiental con los clientes, tecnologías digitales, gestión ecológica de los recursos humanos, compras ecológicas, fabricación ecológica y logística inversa, así como tres conceptos de rendimiento sostenible: rendimiento económico, medioambiental y social. sostenible: rendimiento económico, medioambiental y social. Además, el tamaño y la orientación exportadora se consideraron variables moderadoras. Se diseñó de 281 empresas manufactureras de Colombia. Los datos recogidos se analizaron mediante un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales por mínimos cuadrados parciales (PLS-SEM) mediante un procedimiento de cuatro pasos que incluyó la caracterización de datos y modelos, el modelo de medición, el modelo estructural y capacidad predictiva, así como análisis de robustez. Los resultados validaron el modelo teórico propuesto, mostrando que existe una jerarquía de capacidades dinámicas medioambientales, y que esta jerarquía influye en el rendimiento sostenible, ya que se constató que las capacidades dinámicas medioambientales de orden superior influyen indirectamente en el rendimiento sostenible a través de las capacidades dinámicas medioambientales de orden inferior. Además, se constató que existe un equilibrio entre las tres dimensiones del rendimiento sostenible como resultado de los efectos de las capacidades dinámicas medioambientales, lo que aporta pruebas del paradigma "todos ganan", así como de las relaciones progresivas entre los tres pilares. En cuanto a las variables moderadoras, el análisis multigrupo reveló diferencias estadísticas únicamente para el tamaño de la empresa. Esta tesis doctoral presenta una contribución novedosa al campo de estudio al identificar y analizar los efectos del enfoque GSCM sobre el desempeño sostenible (económico, ambiental y social) desde el DCV en empresas manufactureras colombianas. Específicamente, se destaca el aporte de esta tesis doctoral al proponer el concepto de "capacidades dinámicas ambientales del GSCM", un marco integrado de nueve capacidades dinámicas ambientales, y un modelo teórico que propone y valida empíricamente una jerarquía de capacidades dinámicas ambientales y sus efectos sobre el desempeño sostenible. Además, los resultados obtenidos aportan nuevos conocimientos sobre el paradigma win-win de la sostenibilidad, al proponer y validar empíricamente que las capacidades dinámicas medioambientales pueden mejorar directamente los resultados sociales y medioambientales de una empresa, e indirectamente sus resultados económicos. En cuanto a los aportes metodológicos, se destaca la construcción y validación del instrumento de recolección de datos, el cual sirve de referencia para futuras investigaciones enfocadas en cadenas de suministro verdes y desempeño sostenible en empresas manufactureras no solo en el contexto colombiano, sino también en otras regiones. Otro aporte metodológico relevante es la aplicación del PLS-SEM para el análisis de datos mediante un novedoso procedimiento de cuatro pasos, que combina diferentes técnicas avanzadas y recientes como el análisis de mediación, nuevas técnicas para el análisis del modelo de medición y la validez predictiva del modelo, y análisis de robustez como la heterogeneidad observada e inobservada y la endogeneidad. Desde una perspectiva práctica, se espera que los resultados de la investigación sirvan de hoja de ruta a los gestores y responsables de la toma de decisiones para mejorar paso a paso el rendimiento sostenible, planificar el desarrollo de las capacidades dinámicas medioambientales y orientar las inversiones en sostenibilidad empresarial. Además, las conclusiones obtenidas pueden ser relevantes para los responsables de la toma de decisiones y los formuladores de políticas en el país, ya que pueden arrojar luz sobre cómo el sector industrial puede lograr mejores resultados económicos, medioambientales y sociales a partir del desarrollo de capacidades dinámicas medioambientales del enfoque GSCM. Por último, la difusión de los conocimientos derivados de esta tesis doctoral se ha traducido en la publicación de cuatro artículos científicos en revistas de alto factor de impacto, un libro de investigación, un capítulo de libro, la presentación de tres comunicaciones en congresos internacionales, tres comunicaciones en congresos nacionales, una estancia doctoral en el extranjero y la concesión de un premio a la mejor comunicación en un congreso internacional.spa
dc.description.curricularareaIndustrial, Organizaciones Y Logística.Sede Manizalesspa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ingenieríaspa
dc.description.researchareaProducción, Operaciones y logíticaspa
dc.format.extent169 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86697
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizalesspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería y Arquitecturaspa
dc.publisher.placeManizales, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programManizales - Ingeniería y Arquitectura - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizacionesspa
dc.relation.referencesAb Talib, M. S., & Muniandy, S. (2013). Green supply chain initiatives in Malaysia: A conceptual critical success factors framework. World Applied Sciences Journal, 26(2), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.26.02.1479spa
dc.relation.referencesAbbas, B., Razak, A., & Wekke, I. S. (2019). Investigating green supply chain practices for economic growth. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7, 783–792. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.1.002spa
dc.relation.referencesAbd Rahman, A., Ho, J. A., & Rusli, K. A. (2014). Pressures, green supply chain management practices and performance of ISO 14001 certified manufacturers in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Management, 8(Specialissue), 1–24.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbdallah, A. B., & Al-Ghwayeen, W. S. (2019). Green supply chain management and business performance: The mediating roles of environmental and operational performances. Business Process Management Journal, 26(2), 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2018-0091spa
dc.relation.referencesAbdullah, R., Mohamad, M. N., & Thurasamy, R. (2019). Towards sustainable performance: Promoting eco-design in green supply chain management practices. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 609–616spa
dc.relation.referencesAbu Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M. Z., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211spa
dc.relation.referencesAcquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., & Afum, E. (2020). Examining the link among green human resource management practices, green supply chain management practices and performance. Benchmarking, 1463–5771. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2020-0205spa
dc.relation.referencesAfum, E., Osei-Ahenkan, V. Y., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Amponsah Owusu, J., Kusi, L. Y., & Ankomah, J. (2020). Green manufacturing practices and sustainable performance among Ghanaian manufacturing SMEs: the explanatory link of green supply chain integration. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(6), 1457–1475. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2020-0019spa
dc.relation.referencesAguilar E, Diaz D, García CP, et al (2020). Incidencia de los apoyos públicos y privados en el desempeño ambiental en empresas de negocios verdes en Bogotá región (Colombia). Rev ITEES 1:1019–1046spa
dc.relation.referencesAgyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., & Ahenkorah, E. (2020). Exploring financial performance and green logistics management practices: Examining the mediating influences of market, environmental and social performances. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120613spa
dc.relation.referencesAgyabeng-Mensah, Y., Ahenkorah, E., Afum, E., Nana Agyemang, A., Agnikpe, C., & Rogers, F. (2020). Examining the influence of internal green supply chain practices, green human resource management and supply chain environmental cooperation on firm performance. Supply Chain Management, 25(5), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2019-0405spa
dc.relation.referencesAgyabeng-Mensah, Y., & Tang, L. (2021). The relationship among green human capital, green logistics practices, green competitiveness, social performance and financial performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(7), 1377–1398.spa
dc.relation.referencesAhi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341.spa
dc.relation.referencesAhi, P., & Searcy, C. (2015). An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005spa
dc.relation.referencesAhi, P., Searcy, C., & Jaber, M. Y. (2016). Energy-related performance measures employed in sustainable supply chains : A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 7(October 2015), 1–15.spa
dc.relation.referencesAhmed, M., Thaheem, M. J., & Maqsoom, A. (2019). Barriers and opportunities to greening the construction supply chain management: Cause-driven implementation strategies for developing countries. Benchmarking, January 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2019-0192spa
dc.relation.referencesAhmed, W., Ashraf, M. S., Khan, S. A., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Arhin, F. K., Kusi-Sarpong, H., & Najmi, A. (2020). Analyzing the impact of environmental collaboration among supply chain stakeholders on a firm’s sustainable performance. Operations Management Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-020-00152-1spa
dc.relation.referencesAhmed, W., Najmi, A., Arif, M., & Younus, M. (2019). Exploring firm performance by institutional pressures driven green supply chain management practices. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(5), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-04-2018-0022spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Minhas, U., Ndubisi, N. O., & Barrane, F. . (2020). Corporate environmental management A review and integration of green human resource management and green logistics. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal., 31(2), 1477–7835. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2019-0161spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Sheyadi, A., Muyldermans, L., & Kauppi, K. (2019). The complementarity of green supply chain management practices and the impact on environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 242(May), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.078spa
dc.relation.referencesAli, A., Bentley, Y., Cao, G., & Habib, F. (2017). Green supply chain management–food for thought? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2016.1226788spa
dc.relation.referencesAli, S. S., Kaur, R., Ersöz, F., Altaf, B., Basu, A., & Weber, G. W. (2020). Measuring carbon performance for sustainable green supply chain practices: a developing country scenario. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 28(4), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00673-xspa
dc.relation.referencesAlsaffar, A. J., & Haapala, K. R. (2011). Consideration of Manufacturing Processes and the Supply Chain. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference MSEC2011, 1–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesAltaf, B., Ali, S. S., & Weber, G. W. (2020). Modeling the relationship between organizational performance and green supply chain practices using canonical correlation analysis. Wireless Networks, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02313-3spa
dc.relation.referencesAmbrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20(SUPP. 1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00610.xspa
dc.relation.referencesAmjad, A., Abbass, K., Hussain, Y., Khan, F., & Sadiq, S. (2022). Effects of the green supply chain management practices on firm performance and sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 0123456789, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19954-wspa
dc.relation.referencesAmui, L. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Kannan, D. (2017). Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103spa
dc.relation.referencesAnand, K. R., Ramalingaiah, & Parthiban, P. (2014). Evaluation of Green Supply Chain Factors Using DEMATEL. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 592–594, 2619–2627. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.592-594.2619spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1989-14190-001spa
dc.relation.referencesAnilkumar E.N., & Sridharan R. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of System Dynamics Applications, 8(3), 15–52. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsda.2019070102spa
dc.relation.referencesAraque-González, G., Suárez-Hernández, A., Gómez-Vásquez, M., Vélez-Uribe, J., & Bernal-Avellaneda, A. (2022). Sustainable Manufacturing in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Big Data Application Proposal in the Textile Industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 15(4), 614–636. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3922spa
dc.relation.referencesArmstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783spa
dc.relation.referencesArora, A., Arora, A. S., Sivakumar, K., & Burke, G. (2020). Strategic sustainable purchasing, environmental collaboration, and organizational sustainability performance: the moderating role of supply base size. Supply Chain Management, 25(6), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2019-0284spa
dc.relation.referencesAsif, M. S., Lau, H., Nakandala, D., Fan, Y., & Hurriyet, H. (2020). Adoption of green supply chain management practices through collaboration approach in developing countries – From literature review to conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124191spa
dc.relation.referencesAvendaño Prieto, G., & Díaz Pulido, J. M. (2015). Sistema de gestión de la logística inversa en el sector de la refrigeración en la ciudad de Bogotá. Revista Ontare, 1(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.21158/23823399.v1.n2.2013.1229spa
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz Machado, V. (2011). The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 850–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.017spa
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, S. G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2013). Ecosilient Index to assess the greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.011spa
dc.relation.referencesBaah, C., Jin, Z., & Tang, L. (2020). Organizational and regulatory stakeholder pressures friends or foes to green logistics practices and financial performance: Investigating corporate reputation as a missing link. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119125spa
dc.relation.referencesBag, S., Dhamija, P., Bryde, D. J., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Effect of eco-innovation on green supply chain management, circular economy capability, and performance of small and medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 141(December 2021), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.011spa
dc.relation.referencesBag, S., & Gupta, S. (2020). Examining the effect of green human capital availability in adoption of reverse logistics and remanufacturing operations performance. International Journal of Manpower, 41(7), 1097–1117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2019-0349spa
dc.relation.referencesBag, S., Gupta, S., Kumar, S., & Sivarajah, U. (2020). Role of technological dimensions of green supply chain management practices on firm performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2019-0324spa
dc.relation.referencesBag, S., Gupta, S., & Luo, Z. (2020). Examining the role of logistics 4.0 enabled dynamic capabilities on firm performance. International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(3), 607–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2019-0311spa
dc.relation.referencesBag, S., Wood, L. C., Mangla, S. K., & Luthra, S. (2020). Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152(September 2019), 104502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502spa
dc.relation.referencesBag, S., Wood, L. C., Xu, L., Dhamija, P., & Kayikci, Y. (2020). Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153(October 2019), 104559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104559spa
dc.relation.referencesBagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assesing Construct Validity in Organiational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458.spa
dc.relation.referencesBai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776spa
dc.relation.referencesBai, C., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Sarkis, J. (2017). An implementation path for green information technology systems in the Ghanaian mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.151spa
dc.relation.referencesBai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2013). Flexibility in reverse logistics: A framework and evaluation approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.005spa
dc.relation.referencesBalakrishnan, A. S., & Suresh, J. (2018). Green supply chain management in Indian automotive sector. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 29(4), 502. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlsm.2018.090476spa
dc.relation.referencesBaliga, R., Raut, R., & Kamble, S. (2019). The effect of motivators, supply, and lean management on sustainable supply chain management practices and performance: Systematic literature review and modeling. Benchmarking, 27(1), 347–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2019-0004spa
dc.relation.referencesBalon, V. (2019). Green supply chain management : Pressures , practices , and performance — An integrative literature review. Business Strategy and Development, September, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.91spa
dc.relation.referencesBari, N., Chimhundu, R., & Chan, K. C. (2022). Dynamic Capabilities to Achieve Corporate Sustainability: A Roadmap to Sustained Competitive Advantage. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031531spa
dc.relation.referencesBarney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776spa
dc.relation.referencesBarriga Medina HR, Guevara R, Campoverde RE, Paredes-Aguirre MI (2022) Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from South America. Sustain 14:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159579spa
dc.relation.referencesBecker, J. M., Cheah, J. H., Gholamzade, R., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0474spa
dc.relation.referencesBelhadi, A., Kamble, S. S., Zkik, K., Cherrafi, A., & Touriki, F. E. (2020). The integrated effect of Big Data Analytics, Lean Six Sigma and Green Manufacturing on the environmental performance of manufacturing companies: The case of North Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information and Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesBeske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211231344spa
dc.relation.referencesBeske, P., Land, A., & Seuring, S. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026spa
dc.relation.referencesBhatia, M. S., & Gangwani, K. K. (2021). Green supply chain management: Scientometric review and analysis of empirical research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, 124722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124722spa
dc.relation.referencesBianco, D., Bueno, A., Godinho Filho, M., Latan, H., Miller Devós Ganga, G., Frank, A. G., & Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J. (2023). The role of Industry 4.0 in developing resilience for manufacturing companies during COVID-19. International Journal of Production Economics, 256(November 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108728spa
dc.relation.referencesBuzzao, G., & Rizzi, F. (2021). On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2614spa
dc.relation.referencesCarbone, V., Moatti, V., Schoenherr, T., & Gavirneni, S. (2019). From green to good supply chains:: Halo effect between environmental and social responsibility. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 49(8), 839–860. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2017-0382spa
dc.relation.referencesChacón Vargas JR, Moreno Mantilla CE, de Sousa Jabbour ABL (2018) Enablers of sustainable supply chain management and its effect on competitive advantage in the Colombian context. Resour Conserv Recycl 139:237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.018spa
dc.relation.referencesChavez, R., Yu, W., Feng, M., & Wiengarten, F. (2016). The Effect of Customer-Centric Green Supply Chain Management on Operational Performance and Customer Satisfaction. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1868spa
dc.relation.referencesCheah, J. H., Thurasamy, R., Memon, M. A., Chuah, F., & Ting, H. (2020). Multigroup analysis using smartpls: Step-by-step guidelines for business research. Asian Journal of Business Research, 10(3), I–XIX. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.200087spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, C. C., Shih, H. S., Shyur, H. J., & Wu, K. S. (2012). A business strategy selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 64(8), 2544–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2012.06.013spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, I. J., & Kitsis, A. M. (2017). A research framework of sustainable supply chain management: The role of relational capabilities in driving performance. International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), 1454–1478. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2016-0265spa
dc.relation.referencesChiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Seuring, S., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jugend, D., De Camargo Fiorini, P., Latan, H., & Izeppi, W. C. (2020). Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids. Journal of Environmental Management, 264(February), 110416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416spa
dc.relation.referencesChin, T. A., Tat, H. H., & Sulaiman, Z. (2015). Green supply chain management, environmental collaboration and sustainability performance. Procedia CIRP, 26, 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.035spa
dc.relation.referencesChin, T. A., Tat, H. H., Sulaiman, Z., & Muhamad Zainon, S. N. L. (2015). Green supply chain management practices and sustainability performance. Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1359–1362. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6029spa
dc.relation.referencesChoi, S.-B., Min, H., Joo, H.-Y., & Choi, H.-B. (2017). Assessing the impact of green supply chain practices on firm performance in the Korean manufacturing industry. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2016.1160041spa
dc.relation.referencesChopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation (pp. 265-275). Gabler.spa
dc.relation.referencesChoudhary, K., & Sangwan, K. S. (2019a). Adoption of green practices throughout the supply chain: an empirical investigation. Benchmarking, 26(6), 1650–1675. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0293spa
dc.relation.referencesChoudhary, K., & Sangwan, K. S. (2019b). Multiple case study analysis and development of an interpretive structural model for greening of supply chains in Indian ceramic enterprises. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(6), 1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2018-0196spa
dc.relation.referencesDangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability-Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932spa
dc.relation.referencesDanneels, E. (2008). Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smjspa
dc.relation.referencesDe Giovanni, P., & Cariola, A. (2021). Process innovation through industry 4.0 technologies, lean practices and green supply chains. Research in Transportation Economics, 100869, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100869spa
dc.relation.referencesde Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Foropon, C., & Filho, M. G. (2018). When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132(October 2017), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017spa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Nacional de Planeación. (2020). Encuesta Nacional de Logística 2020. Encuesta Nacional de Logística 2020, 170.spa
dc.relation.referencesDhamija, P., Bedi, M., & Gupta, M. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 and supply chain management: A methodological review. International Journal of Business Analytics, 7(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJBAN.2020010101spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-Chao, Á., Ficapal-Cusí, P., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2021). Environmental assets, industry 4.0 technologies and firm performance in Spain: A dynamic capabilities path to reward sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125264spa
dc.relation.referencesDubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Blome, C., Dwivedi, Y. K., Childe, S. J., & Foropon, C. (2024). Alliances and digital transformation are crucial for benefiting from dynamic supply chain capabilities during times of crisis: A multi-method study. International Journal of Production Economics, 269(January), 109166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109166spa
dc.relation.referencesDubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Dwivedi, Y. K., Graham, G., Foropon, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2023). Dynamic digital capabilities and supply chain resilience: The role of government effectiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 258(June 2022), 108790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108790spa
dc.relation.referencesDubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Blome, C., Roubaud, D., & Giannakis, M. (2021). Facilitating artificial intelligence powered supply chain analytics through alliance management during the pandemic crises in the B2B context. Industrial Marketing Management, 96(May), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesDubey, R., Bag, S., & Ali, S. S. (2014). Green supply chain practices and its impact on organisational performance: an insight from Indian rubber industry. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 19(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2014.064029spa
dc.relation.referencesDubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Samar Ali, S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.001spa
dc.relation.referencesEasterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Current debates and future directions. British Journal of Management, 20, S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00609.xspa
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-Espa
dc.relation.referencesEl-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(December 2017), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016spa
dc.relation.referencesElkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106spa
dc.relation.referencesEsfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., & Geng, D. (2023). The fallacy of profitable green supply chains: The role of green information systems (GIS) in attenuating the sustainability trade-offs. International Journal of Production Economics, 255(October 2022), 108703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108703spa
dc.relation.referencesEsfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.013spa
dc.relation.referencesFahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003spa
dc.relation.referencesFainshmidt, S., & Frazier, M. L. (2017). What Facilitates Dynamic Capabilities? The Role of Organizational Climate for Trust. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 550–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.05.005spa
dc.relation.referencesFainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation and Extension. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1348–1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12213spa
dc.relation.referencesFang, C., & Zhang, J. (2018). Performance of green supply chain management: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1064–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.171spa
dc.relation.referencesFirmansyah, A., Qadri, R. A., & Arfiansyah, Z. (2021). The green supply chain and sustainability performance in emerging country. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 10(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv10i1art13spa
dc.relation.referencesGandhi, S., Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2016). A combined approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating success factors in implementation of green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(6), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2016.1164126spa
dc.relation.referencesGeyi, D. G., Yusuf, Y., Menhat, M. S., Abubakar, T., & Ogbuke, N. J. (2020). Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 222(November 2018), 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.022spa
dc.relation.referencesGhadimi, P., O’Neill, S., Wang, C., & Sutherland, J. W. (2020). Analysis of enablers on the successful implementation of green manufacturing for Irish SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2019-0382spa
dc.relation.referencesGhosh, M. (2019). Determinants of green procurement implementation and its impact on firm performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(2), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2018-0168spa
dc.relation.referencesGovindan, K., & Bouzon, M. (2018). From a literature review to a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics barriers and drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.040spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, K. W. K. W., Inman, R. A. A., Sower, V. E. V. E. V. E., & Zelbst, P. J. P. J. P. J. (2018). Impact of JIT, TQM and green supply chain practices on environmental sustainability. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0015spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, K. W., Zelbst, P. J., Bhadauria, V. S., & Meacham, J. (2012). Do environmental collaboration and monitoring enhance organizational performance? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211204254spa
dc.relation.referencesGuang Shi, V., Lenny Koh, S. C., Baldwin, J., & Cucchiella, F. (2012). Natural resource based green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211212203spa
dc.relation.referencesGuo, J., Zhou, S., Chen, J., & Chen, Q. (2021). How information technology capability and knowledge integration capability interact to affect business model design:A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170(December 2020), 120935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120935spa
dc.relation.referencesGupta, A., Singh, R. K., & Gupta, S. (2021). Developing human resource for the digitization of logistics operations: readiness index framework. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0175spa
dc.relation.referencesHair. J., Hult. G, Ringle. C., & Sarstedt.M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (4rd ed). Sage Publicationsspa
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F. (2021). Next-generation prediction metrics for composite-based PLS-SEM. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 121(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0505spa
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100392spa
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesHair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.) (Upper Sadd). NJ: Prentice Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesHelfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10 SPEC ISS.), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332spa
dc.relation.referencesHenseler J (2021) Composite-based Structural Equation Modeling: Analyzing Latent and Emergent Variables. Guildford Press, New Yorkspa
dc.relation.referencesHenseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928spa
dc.relation.referencesHenseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8spa
dc.relation.referencesHerrmann, F. F., Barbosa-Povoa, A. P., Butturi, M. A., Marinelli, S., & Sellitto, M. A. (2021). Green supply chain management: Conceptual framework and models for analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158127spa
dc.relation.referencesHoek, R. I. Van. (1999). From reversed logistics to green supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 4(3), 129–134.spa
dc.relation.referencesHollos, D., Blome, C., & Foerstl, K. (2012). Does sustainable supplier co-operation affect performance? Examining implications for the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 2968–2986. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.582184spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, K., Wang, K., Lee, P. K. C., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2023). The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain capability and supply chain resilience: A dynamic resource-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 262(July 2022), 108913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108913spa
dc.relation.referencesIlyas, S., Hu, Z., & Wiwattanakornwong, K. (2020). Unleashing the role of top management and government support in green supply chain management and sustainable development goals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8), 8210–8223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07268-3spa
dc.relation.referencesIslam, S., Karia, N., Fauzi, F. B. A., & Soliman, M. (2017). A review on green supply chain aspects and practices. Management and Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 12(1), 12–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2017-0002.spa
dc.relation.referencesJabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Frascareli, F. C. D. O., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2015). Green supply chain management and firms’ performance: Understanding potential relationships and the role of green sourcing and some other green practices. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.017spa
dc.relation.referencesJabbour, A. B. L. de S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Latan, H., Teixeira, A. A., & de Oliveira, J. H. C. (2015). Reprint of “Quality management, environmental management maturity, green supply chain practices and green performance of Brazilian companies with ISO 14001 certification: Direct and indirect effects.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 74, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.12.011spa
dc.relation.referencesJabbour, C. J. C., & De Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2016). Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management: Linking two emerging agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1824–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.052spa
dc.relation.referencesJabbour, C. J. C., De Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Govindan, K., De Freitas, T. P., Soubihia, D. F., Kannan, D., & Latan, H. (2016). Barriers to the adoption of green operational practices at Brazilian companies: Effects on green and operational performance. International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 3042–3058. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1154997spa
dc.relation.referencesJassim, S., Al-Mubarak, M., & Hamdan, A. (2020). The Impact of Green Supply Chain Management on Firm’s Performance. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649220400262spa
dc.relation.referencesJell-Ojobor, M., & Raha, A. (2022). Being good at being good—The mediating role of an environmental management system in value-creating green supply chain management practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, December 2021, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2993spa
dc.relation.referencesJiang, W., Mavondo, F. T., & Matanda, M. J. (2015). Integrative capability for successful partnering: a critical dynamic capability. Management Decision, 53(6), 1184-1202.spa
dc.relation.referencesJoshi, G., & Dhar, R. L. (2020). Green training in enhancing green creativity via green dynamic capabilities in the Indian handicraft sector: The moderating effect of resource commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 121948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121948spa
dc.relation.referencesJunaid, M., Zhang, Q., & Syed, M. W. (2022). Effects of sustainable supply chain integration on green innovation and firm performance. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.031spa
dc.relation.referencesKalyar, M. N., Shoukat, A., & Shafique, I. (2019). Enhancing firms’ environmental performance and financial performance through green supply chain management practices and institutional pressures. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(2), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2019-0047spa
dc.relation.referencesKang, M. J., & Hwang, J. (2017). Interactions among Inter-organizational Measures for Green Supply Chain Management. Procedia Manufacturing, 8(October 2016), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.089spa
dc.relation.referencesKaur, J., Sidhu, R., Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S., & Goyal, S. (2018). A DEMATEL based approach for investigating barriers in green supply chain management in Canadian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1395522spa
dc.relation.referencesKazancoglu, Y., Sagnak, M., Kayikci, Y., & Kumar Mangla, S. (2020). Operational excellence in a green supply chain for environmental management: A case study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1532–1547. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2451spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, A., Tao, M., Ahmad, H., Shafique, M. N., & Nawaz, M. Z. (2020). Revisiting Green Supply Chain Management Practices: The Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914637spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. A. R., Dong, Q., Zhang, Y., & Khan, S. S. (2017). The Impact of Green Supply Chain on Enterprise Performance: In the Perspective of China. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 16(03), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686717500160spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. A. R., Godil, D. I., Jabbour, C. J. C., Shujaat, S., Razzaq, A., & Yu, Z. (2021). Green data analytics, blockchain technology for sustainable development, and sustainable supply chain practices: evidence from small and medium enterprises. Annals of Operations Research, Sdg 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04275-xspa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. A. R., & Qianli, D. (2017). Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms’ performance: an empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(20), 16829–16844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9172-5spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. A. R., Tabish, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Embracement of industry 4.0 and sustainable supply chain practices under the shadow of practice-based view theory: Ensuring environmental sustainability in corporate sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 398(August 2022), 136609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136609spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., & Sharif, A. (2021). No Silver Bullet for De-carbonization: Preparing for Tomorrow, Today. Resources Policy, 71(February), 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101942spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. A. R., Zhang, Y., & Nathaniel, S. (2020). Green supply chain performance and environmental sustainability: A panel study. Logforum, 16(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2020.394spa
dc.relation.referencesKhor, K.-S., Ramayah, T., & Fouladgaran, H. R. P. (2020). Managing eco-design for reverse logistics Thurasamy Ramayah Hamid Reza Panjeh Fouladgaran. 26(2), 125–146.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhor, K. S., & Udin, Z. M. (2013). Reverse logistics in Malaysia: Investigating the effect of green product design and resource commitment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 81, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.08.005spa
dc.relation.referencesKhor, K. S., Udin, Z. M., Ramayah, T., & Hazen, B. T. (2016). Reverse logistics in Malaysia: The Contingent role of institutional pressure. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.020spa
dc.relation.referencesKitsis, A. M., & Chen, I. J. (2021). Do stakeholder pressures influence green supply chain Practices?Exploring the mediating role of top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316(September 2020), 128258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128258spa
dc.relation.referencesKock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131spa
dc.relation.referencesKulangara, N. P., Biehl, M., & Prater, E. L. (2022). Environmentally sustainable development initiatives in upstream strategic outsourcing relationships: Examining the role of innovative capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3014–3027. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3061spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, G., Meena, P., & Difrancesco, R. M. (2021). How do collaborative culture and capability improve sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125824spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, N., Brint, A., Shi, E., Upadhyay, A., & Ruan, X. (2019). Integrating sustainable supply chain practices with operational performance: an exploratory study of Chinese SMEs. Production Planning and Control, 30(5–6), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1501816spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, N., Kumar, G., & Singh, R. K. (2021). Big data analytics application for sustainable manufacturing operations: analysis of strategic factors. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23(3), 965–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-02008-5spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, S., & Bhatia, M. S. (2021). Environmental dynamism, industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating role of organizational and technological factors. Industrial Marketing Management, 95(March), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.03.010spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar Shetty, S., & Subrahmanya Bhat, K. (2022). Green supply chain management practices implementation and sustainability –A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52, 735–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.135spa
dc.relation.referencesKusi-Sarpong, S., Sarkis, J., & Wang, X. (2016). Assessing green supply chain practices in the Ghanaian mining industry: A framework and evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.002spa
dc.relation.referencesKιrcι, M., & Seifert, R. (2015). Dynamic Capabilities in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Theoretical Framework. Supply Chain Forum, 16(4), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2015.11728690spa
dc.relation.referencesLaari, S., Solakivi, T., Töyli, J., & Ojala, L. (2016). Performance outcomes of environmental collaboration: Evidence from Finnish logistics service providers. Baltic Journal of Management, 11(4), 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-03-2015-0081spa
dc.relation.referencesLatan, H. (2018). Chapter 4 PLS Path Modeling in Hospitality and Tourism Research: The Golden Age and Days of Future Past. In Applying Partial Least Squares in Tourism and Hospitality Research (Issue August). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-699-620181004spa
dc.relation.referencesLe, T. T. (2020). The effect of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance in Vietnamese construction materials manufacturing enterprises. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.8.007spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, L., Zhou, H., Yang, S., & Teo, T. S. H. (2023). Leveraging digitalization for sustainability: An affordance perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 624–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.011spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, Y., Dai, J., & Cui, L. (2020). The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 229(May 2019), 107777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777spa
dc.relation.referencesLiengaard, B. D., Sharma, P. N., Hult, G. T. M., Jensen, M. B., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Prediction: Coveted, Yet Forsaken? Introducing a Cross-Validated Predictive Ability Test in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(2), 362–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12445spa
dc.relation.referencesLindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, J., Hu, H., Tong, X., & Zhu, Q. (2020). Behavioral and technical perspectives of green supply chain management practices: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 140(December 2019), 102013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102013spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, J., Liu, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Uncovering the influence mechanism between top management support and green procurement: The effect of green training. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119674spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, S., & Chang, Y. T. (2017). Manufacturers’ Closed-loop orientation for green supply chain management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020222spa
dc.relation.referencesLongoni, A., & Cagliano, R. (2018). Inclusive environmental disclosure practices and firm performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, IJOPM-12-2016-0728. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2016-0728spa
dc.relation.referencesLopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Choi, T. M., & Latan, H. (2022). ‘Better together’: Evidence on the joint adoption of circular economy and industry 4.0 technologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 252(August 2020), 108581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581spa
dc.relation.referencesLopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Choi, T. M., & Latan, H. (2022). ‘Better together’: Evidence on the joint adoption of circular economy and industry 4.0 technologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 252(August 2020), 108581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581spa
dc.relation.referencesLoureiro, R., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Simões, J. (2021). Approaches to measuring dynamic capabilities: Theoretical insights and the research agenda. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 62(September). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101657spa
dc.relation.referencesLu, J., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Rong, D., Ahmed, R. R., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Modified Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility to enhance organizational performance of SMEs industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122456spa
dc.relation.referencesLuo, J., Bi, M., & Kuang, H. (2021). Design of evaluation scheme for social responsibility of china’s transportation enterprises from the perspective of green supply chain management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063390spa
dc.relation.referencesLuthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015). Critical success factors of green supply chain management for achieving sustainability in Indian automobile industry. Production Planning and Control, 26(5), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2014.904532spa
dc.relation.referencesMafini, C., & Loury-Okoumba, W. V. (2018). Extending green supply chain management activities to manufacturing small and medium enterprises in a developing economy. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1996spa
dc.relation.referencesMalviya, R. K., & Kant, R. (2015). Green supply chain management (GSCM): a structured literature review and research implications. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(7), 1360–1394. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216spa
dc.relation.referencesMani, V., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Mani, K. T. N. (2020). Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 227(July 2019), 107656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107656spa
dc.relation.referencesMardani, A., Kannan, D., Hooker, R. E., Ozkul, S., Alrasheedi, M., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2020). Evaluation of green and sustainable supply chain management using structural equation modelling: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119383spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, J. D. (2021). An overview of the end-of-life tires status in some Latin American countries: Proposing pyrolysis for a circular economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144(November 2020), 111032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111032spa
dc.relation.referencesMelnyk, S. A., Page, T. J., Wu, S. J., & Burns, L. A. (2012). Would you mind completing this survey: Assessing the state of survey research in supply chain management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2011.12.002spa
dc.relation.referencesMendoza-Fong, J. R., García-Alcaraz, J. L., Macías, E. J., Ibarra Hernández, N. L., Díaz-Reza, J. R., & Fernández, J. B. (2018). Role of information and communication technology in green supply chain implementation and companies’ performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061793spa
dc.relation.referencesMeredith, J. R., Raturi, A., Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Kaplan, B. (1989). Alternative research paradigms in operations. Journal of Operations Management, 8(4), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8spa
dc.relation.referencesMessmann, L., Zender, V., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2020). How to quantify social impacts in strategic supply chain optimization: State of the art. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120459spa
dc.relation.referencesMicheli, G. J. L., Cagno, E., Mustillo, G., & Trianni, A. (2020). Green supply chain management drivers, practices and performance: A comprehensive study on the moderators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 121024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121024spa
dc.relation.referencesMishra, P. (2017a). Framework for Sustainable Organizational Development in an Emerging Economy. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25, No 5. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216spa
dc.relation.referencesMishra, P. (2017b). Green human resource management: A framework for sustainable organizational development in an emerging economy. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5), 762–788. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2016-1079spa
dc.relation.referencesMitra, S., & Datta, P. P. (2014). Adoption of green supply chain management practices and their impact on performance: An exploratory study of Indian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2085–2107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.849014spa
dc.relation.referencesMoroni, I. T., Roman Pais Seles, B. M., Lizarelli, F. L., Guzzo, D., & Mascarenhas Hornos da Costa, J. (2022). Remanufacturing and its impact on dynamic capabilities, stakeholder engagement, eco-innovation and business performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371(August), 133274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133274spa
dc.relation.referencesNayal, K., Raut, R. D., Yadav, V. S., Priyadarshinee, P., & Narkhede, B. E. (2021). The impact of sustainable development strategy on sustainable supply chain firm performance in the digital transformation era. Business Strategy and the Environment, July, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2921spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. hung. (2007a). Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.021spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. hung. (2007b). Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(1), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.003spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. hung. (2008a). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.029spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. hung. (2008b). Green supply chain management implications for “closing the loop.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2006.06.003spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. hung. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Q., Tian, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2012). Diffusion of selected green supply chain management practices: An assessment of Chinese enterprises. Production Planning and Control, 23(10–11), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.642188spa
dc.relation.referencesZimon, D., Tyan, J., & Sroufe, R. (2020). Drivers of Sustainable Supply Chain Management : Practices To Alignment With Un Sustainable. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(1), 219–236.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afinesspa
dc.subject.proposalGreen Supply Chain Management (GSCM)eng
dc.subject.proposalDynamic Capabilities View (DCV)eng
dc.subject.proposalSustainable performanceeng
dc.subject.proposalManufacturing companieseng
dc.subject.proposalPartial least square structural equations modelling (PLS-SEM)eng
dc.subject.proposalGestión ambiental de la cadena de suministro (GSCM)spa
dc.subject.proposalVisión de las capacidades dinámicas (DCV)spa
dc.subject.proposalDesempeño sosteniblespa
dc.subject.proposalEmpresas manufacturerasspa
dc.subject.proposalModelado de ecuaciones estructurales por mínimos cuadrados parciales (PLS-SEM)spa
dc.subject.unescoIndustrializaciónspa
dc.subject.unescoIndustrializationeng
dc.titleEffects of GSCM practices on sustainable performance of colombian manufacturing companies : A dynamic capabilities vieweng
dc.title.translatedEfectos de las prácticas de GSCM en el desempeño sostenible de las empresas manufactureras colombianas: una visión desde las capacidades dinámicasspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentBibliotecariosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1053811983.2024.pdf
Tamaño:
5.21 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: