Caracterización del uso de las teorías de decisiones conductuales para individuos en modelado

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorFranco, Carlos Jaimespa
dc.contributor.authorTabares Arango, Carolinaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-28T20:02:10Zspa
dc.date.available2020-09-28T20:02:10Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-04-30spa
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this Final Work is to characterize the most used Behavioral Decision Theories for individuals in Systems Modeling, which integrates different attributes and allows knowing the fields of knowledge and the modeling tools applied. Chapter 1 provides the background to the problem and the research questions, as well as a theoretical framework for schools of thought and decisions. In Chapter 2 a review of the literature on behavioral change theories is made, the most popular theories are selected and detailed. Chapter 3 presents the methodology of the Systematic Literature Review and its results. Chapter 4 presents the characterization matrix of the selected theories, with attributes such as the field of knowledge, the application to real cases and the modeling tool. Finally, in Chapter 8 the conclusions resulting from this Final Work are collected.spa
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de este Trabajo Final es caracterizar las Teorías de Decisión Conductuales para individuos más utilizadas en el Modelado en Sistemas, que integre diferentes atributos y permita conocer los campos de conocimiento y las herramienta de modelado aplicadas. En el Capítulo 1 se proporcionan los antecedentes de la problemática y las preguntas de investigación, así como un marco teórico de las las escuelas de pensamiento y decisión. En el Capítulo 2 se realiza una revisión de literatura sobre las teorías de cambio de comportamiento, se seleccionan y detallan las teorías más populares. En el Capítulo 3 se presenta las metodología de la Revisión Sistemática de Literatura y sus resultados. En el Capítulo 4 se presenta la matriz de caracterización de las teorías seleccionadas, con atributos como el campo de conocimiento, la aplicación a casos reales y la herramienta de modelado. Finalmente, en el Capítulo 8 se recogen las conclusiones resultantes de este Trabajo Final.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent50spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationTabares, C., & Franco, C. J. (2020). Caracterización del uso de las teorías de decisiones conductuales para individuos en modeladospa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78511
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemasspa
dc.relation.referencesAdam, C., Bailly, C., & Dugdale, J. (2019). Communication During Bushfires, Towards a Serious Game for a Serious Matter. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 10(2), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijiscram.2018040104spa
dc.relation.referencesAdefolalu, A. O. (2018). Cognitive-behavioural theories and adherence: Application and relevance in antiretroviral therapy. Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.762spa
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995spa
dc.relation.referencesAliev, R. A., Pedrycz, W., Kreinovich, V., & Huseynov, O. H. (2015). The general theory of decisions. Information Sciences, 327, 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.07.055spa
dc.relation.referencesBalke, T., & Gilbert, G. N. (2014). How Do Agents Make Decisions ? A Survey Introduction : Purpose & Goals Dimensions of Comparison Production Rule Systems. Jasss, 17(2014), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2687spa
dc.relation.referencesBaretta, D., Sartori, F., Greco, A., Addario, M. D. ’, Melen, R., Steca, P., & Rebaudengo, M. (2019). Development of a Computational Model of Self-Efficacy Theory to Define Adaptive Goals for Exercise Promotion. Research Article Improving Physical Activity MHealth Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3068748spa
dc.relation.referencesBaron, J. (2008). Thinking and Deciding (4th editio). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840265spa
dc.relation.referencesBeach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305717spa
dc.relation.referencesBorrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20038spa
dc.relation.referencesBouanan, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Ribault, J., & Vallespir, B. (2019). Discrete Event System Specification-based framework for modeling and simulation of propagation phenomena in social networks: application to the information spreading in a multi-layer social network. Modeling and Simulation International, 95(5), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549718776368spa
dc.relation.referencesCadavid, D. L. (2015). Aproximación metodológica al análisis de la difusión de innovaciones en productos que utilizan tecnologías limpias considerando elecciones individuales de adopción, 347. Retrieved from http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/47098/spa
dc.relation.referencesCadavid, L., & Franco, C. J. (2014). Impacto de la regla de decisión en el modelado de la difusión de innovaciones.spa
dc.relation.referencesChang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., & Lin, S. C. (2020). An elaboration likelihood model of consumer respond action to facebook second-hand marketplace: Impulsiveness as a moderator. Information and Management, 57(2), 103171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103171spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2015). Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941722spa
dc.relation.referencesDing, Zhikun Yi, Guizhen W.Y. Tamb, Vivian Huang, T. (2016). A system dynamics-based environmental performance simulation of construction waste reduction management in China. Waste Management, 51, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2016.03.001spa
dc.relation.referencesDurham, D. P., & Casman, E. A. (2012). Incorporating individual health-protective decisions into disease transmission models: A mathematical framework. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9(68), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0325spa
dc.relation.referencesEdwards, W. (1961). Behavioral Decision Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 12, 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.28.020177.000245spa
dc.relation.referencesEinhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53–88.spa
dc.relation.referencesErnecoff, N. C., Keane, C. R., & Albert, S. M. (2016). Health behavior change in advance care planning: an agent-based model. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2872-9spa
dc.relation.referencesFrancis, J. J., Stockton, C., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Cuthbertson, B. H., Grimshaw, J. M., ... Stanworth, S. J. (2009). Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: Using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians’ blood transfusion behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(4), 625–646. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X397025spa
dc.relation.referencesHekler, E. B., Buman, M. P., Ahn, D., Dunton, G., Atienza, A. A., & King, A. C. (2012). Are daily fluctuations in perceived environment associated with walking? Psychology & Health, 27(9), 1009–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.645213spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, J.-C. (2010). Remote health monitoring adoption model based on artificial neural networks. Expert Systems With Applications, 37, 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.063spa
dc.relation.referencesJager, W. (2017). Enhancing the realism of simulation (EROS): On implementing and developing psychological theory in social simulation. JASSS, 20(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3522spa
dc.relation.referencesKane, M. B. (2018). Modeling Human-in-the-Loop Behavior and Interactions with HVAC Systems. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (Vol. 2018-June, pp. 4628–4633). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2018.8431913spa
dc.relation.referencesKitchen, P. J., Kerr, G., Schultz, D. E., McColl, R., & Pals, H. (2014). The elaboration likelihood model: Review, critique and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11–12), 2033–2050. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0776spa
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Software Engineering Group School of Computer Science and Mathematics, 65.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlabunde, A., & Willekens, F. (2016). Decision-Making in Agent-Based Models of Migration: State of the Art and Challenges. European Journal of Population, 32(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-015-9362-0spa
dc.relation.referencesKlabunde, A., Zinn, S., Willekens, F., & Leuchter, M. (2017). Multistate modelling extended by behavioural rules: An application to migration. Population Studies, 71(sup1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2017.1350281spa
dc.relation.referencesLévesque, L., Gauvin, L., & Desharnais, R. (2003). Maintaining exercise involvement: the role of learned resourcefulness in process of change use. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00007-9spa
dc.relation.referencesLiberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., ... Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, H., Hu, B., & Hu, X. (2015). Modeling and simulation of the collective efficacy of distributed organizations: toward an interdependent network. SIMULATION, 91(5), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549715581862spa
dc.relation.referencesLo Schiavo, M., Prinari, B., Saito, I., Shoji, K., & Benight, C. C. (2018). A dynamical systems approach to triadic reciprocal determinism of social cognitive theory. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 159, 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2018.10.006spa
dc.relation.referencesLorito, C. Di, Pollock, K., Harwood, R., Das Nair, R., Logan, P., Goldberg, S., ... Van Der Wardt, V. (2019). A scoping review of behaviour change theories in adults without dementia to adapt and develop the “PHYT in dementia”, a model promoting physical activity in people with dementia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.01.008spa
dc.relation.referencesMa, J., Chan, W., & Tilley, B. C. (2018). Continuous time Markov chain approaches for analyzing transtheoretical models of health behavioral change: A case study and comparison of model estimations. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 27(2), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216639859spa
dc.relation.referencesMa, J., Chan, W., Tsai, C. L., Xiong, M., & Tilley, B. C. (2015). Analysis of transtheoretical model of health behavioral changes in a nutrition intervention study-a continuous time Markov chain model with Bayesian approach. Statistics in Medicine, 34(27), 3577–3589. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6571spa
dc.relation.referencesMartin, C. A., Rivera, D. E., Hekler, E. B., Riley, W. T., Buman, M. P., Adams, M. A., & Magann, A. B. (2020). Development of a Control-Oriented Model of Social Cognitive Theory for Optimized mHealth Behavioral Interventions. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 28(2), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2018.2873538spa
dc.relation.referencesMartín, C. A., Rivera, D. E., Riley, W. T., Hekler, E. B., Buman, M. P., Adams, M. A., & King, A. C. (2014). A dynamical systems model of Social Cognitive Theory. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (pp. 2407–2412). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2014.6859463spa
dc.relation.referencesMcFall, J. P. (2015). Rational, normative, descriptive, prescriptive, or choice behavior? The search for integrative metatheory of decision making. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 20(1), 45– 59. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101039spa
dc.relation.referencesMedlock, S., & Wyatt, J. C. (2019). Health Behaviour Theory in Health Informatics: Support for Positive Change. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 263, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190119spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, Z. D. (2017). The Enduring Use of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(6), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2017.1347967spa
dc.relation.referencesParikh, N., Marathe, M., & Swarup, S. (2017). Integrating behavior and microsimulation models. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10051 LNAI, pp. 39–59). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51957-9_3spa
dc.relation.referencesPetersen, K. and Feldt, R. and Mujtaba, S. and Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, (June), 68–77.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19(C), 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065- 2601(08)60214-2spa
dc.relation.referencesRedlawsk, D. P., & Lau, R. R. (2013). Behavioral Decision-Making. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0005spa
dc.relation.referencesRichetin, J., Sengupta, A., Marco, P., Iqbal, A., Robert, H., Danica, G., & Michael, S. (2010). A micro-level simulation for the prediction of intention and behavior. Cognitive SystemsResearch, 11(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGSYS.2009.08.001spa
dc.relation.referencesRiley, W. T., Martin, C. A., Rivera, D. E., Hekler, E. B., Adams, M. A., Buman, M. P., ... King, A. C. (2016). Development of a dynamic computational model of social cognitive theory. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0356- 6spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlüter, M., Baeza, A., Dressler, G., Frank, K., Groeneveld, J., Jager, W., ... Wijermans, N. (2017). A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social- ecological systems. Ecological Economics, 131, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008spa
dc.relation.referencesStingl, V., & Geraldi, J. (2017). Errors, lies and misunderstandings: Systematic review on behavioural decision making in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2016.10.009spa
dc.relation.referencesTimms, K. P., Martin, C. A., Rivera, D. E., Hekler, E. B., & Riley, W. (2014). Leveraging intensive longitudinal data to better understand health behaviors. In 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014 (pp. 6888–6891). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945211spa
dc.relation.referencesTohmé, F., Caterina, G., & Gangle, R. (2017). Local and global optima in decision-making: a sheaf- theoretical analysis of the difference between classical and behavioral approaches. International Journal of General Systems, 46(8), 879–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2017.1355913spa
dc.relation.referencesTurner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S., Budgen, D., Pearl Brereton, O., & Kitchenham, B. (2008). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Cranenburgh, S., & Chorus, C. G. (2018). Does the decision rule matter for large-scale transport models? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 114, 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2018.01.035spa
dc.relation.referencesVelásquez Henao, J. D. (2015). Una Guía Corta para Escribir Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Parte 2. Dyna, 82(190), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n190.49511spa
dc.relation.referencesWebb, T. L., Sniehotta, F. F., & Michie, S. (2010). Using theories of behaviour change to inform interventions for addictive behaviours. Addiction, 105(11), 1879–1892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03028.xspa
dc.relation.referencesWest, R., Godinho, C. A., Bohlen, L. C., Carey, R. N., Hastings, J., Lefevre, C. E., & Michie, S. (2019). Development of a formal system for representing behaviour-change theories. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(5), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0561-2spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afinesspa
dc.subject.proposalTeoría de decisión conductualesspa
dc.subject.proposalBehavioral Decisioneng
dc.subject.proposalTeoría del cambio de comportamientospa
dc.subject.proposalBehavioral change theorieseng
dc.subject.proposalModelingeng
dc.subject.proposalModeladospa
dc.subject.proposalTheory of planned Behavioreng
dc.subject.proposalTeoría del comportamiento planeadospa
dc.subject.proposalSocial Cognitive Theoryeng
dc.subject.proposalTeoría cognitiva socialspa
dc.subject.proposalModelo de creencias de saludspa
dc.subject.proposalHealth Belief Modeleng
dc.subject.proposalModelo Transteóricospa
dc.subject.proposalTranstheoretical Model - Stages of changeeng
dc.subject.proposalModelo de Elaboración de Probabilidadesspa
dc.subject.proposalElaboration Likelihood Modeleng
dc.subject.proposalModelo Transteórico - Etapas de cambiospa
dc.titleCaracterización del uso de las teorías de decisiones conductuales para individuos en modeladospa
dc.title.alternativeCharacterization of the use of individual behavioral decision theories in modelingspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
43984898.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
764.13 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.8 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas